To, Date – 25th May 2015 Shri Manohar Parikar Defence Minister Room No -104 South Block, Ministry of Defence New Delhi-110011
SUBJECT: IRREGULARITIES IN APPOINTMENT OF MS. SHWETA SINGH, JRF and SRF AT DEFENCE RESEARCH LABORATORY (DRL), TEZPUR BY DR. VIJAY VEER, DIRECTOR, DRL, TEZPUR, DRDO, MIN. OF DEFENCE
Sir,
Within last 10 years a bunch of DRDO officials running DRDO with their own made rules whether it is related of procurements or recruitments like the following case of recruitment of Ms Sweta Singh as JRF/SRF in DRL, DRDO, Tezpur by Dr. Vijay Veer, Director is a small example of manipulations in GOI laid down rules.
- Defence Research Laboratory (DRL), Tezpur (Assam) is an establishment under Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO), Ministry of Defence.
- Vijay Veer, Scientist ‘G’ is Director, DRL, Tezpur with effect from 01 March 2012. Prior to him Dr. Lokendra Singh was Director of this establishment since the year 2010 to 28 Feb 2012.
- A.K. Singh is Director (Personnel), Dte. Of Personnel (DOP) at DRDO HQ, DRDO Bhawan, New Delhi with effect from 01 Dec 2012 and prior to this he was posted as Director, DHRD at DRDO HQ from Oct 2010 to 27 Feb 2013.
- A.K. Singh, Director (Personnel) hails from Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh which is evident from his IPR available at DRDO website. Copy of IPR is attached as Annexure No. -1.
- Shri Virendra Pal Singh (V.P. Singh) who is an official of Arunachal Pradesh, Government also hails from Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh.
- Lokendra Singh, Dr. Vijay Veer and Dr. RKR Singh, TO ‘C’, Estate Officer and Shri V.P. Singh are good friend and know each other very well as Shri V.P. Singh regularly staying at DRL, Guest House, Tezpur since past several years while he is not an DRDO/Service employee and no office/project of Arunachal Pradesh Government is existing at DRL, Tezpur. The rent of VIP suits at DRL, Guest house is only Rs. 50 -100 while the same accommodation at Hotel in Tezpur is about Rs. 2000-2500. The reasons why Dr. Lokendra Singh, Ex-Director, DRL and Dr. Vijay Veer, Director, DRL giving such kind of privilege to Shri V.P. Singh is matter of investigation?
- Even the Arunachal Pradesh Government Vehicle with Registration No. AR 01E 0879 is regularly parked at House of Dr. RKR Singh, TO ‘C’, Estate Officer, DRL, Tezpur. The same Government vehicle was also found in New DRL Guest House. The Photograph of Vehicle No. AR 01E 0879 of Arunachal Pradesh Government parked at New DRL Guest House is attached as Annexure No. -2.
- A.K. Singh, Director(Personnel) , DRDO HQ is holding sensitive posts continuously since past 8 years as Director, CEPTAM, Director, DHRD and Director(Personnel), which is against CVC Guidelines. I have filed three complaints against him to PMO & MOD on charges of Corruption. He was holding the post of Director, DHRD from October 2010 – 27 February 2013. DHRD is responsible for recruitment of JRF, SRF and Research Associates in various DRDO establishments and formulates guidelines for their appointments etc.
This complaint is regarding irregular appointment of Ms. Shweta Singh D/o Shri V.P. Singh, Aligarh as Junior Research Fellow (JRF) followed by Senior Research Fellow (SRF) with two years extension by Dr. Vijay Veer, Director, DRL, Tezpur and extra payment of stipend while she was absent from DRL, Tezpur for about one year.
Brief Facts of the Case
- Shweta Singh, d/o Shri V.P. Singh was appointed as Junior Research Fellow (JRF) at DRL, Tezpur for a period of two year with effect from 03.10.2011 to 02.10.2013. She joined at DRL, Tezpur on 03.10.2011 and posted at Pharmaceutical Technology Division.
- Shweta Singh was getting stipend of Rs. 16000/- month from DRL, Tezpur. She remains absent/highly irregular at DRL, Tezpur during January 2013 to December 2013. Meantime she got married on 28 November 2013 at Aligarh (Uttar Pradesh). She joined back at DRL, Tezpur on 13 January 2014.
- In reply to one letter from Admin Division of DRL, Tezpur, Dr. P. Chattopadhyay, Group Head, Pharmaceutical Technology Division informed to Director, DRL, Tezpur vide his letter dated 07-10-2013 on Subject “Absent of Ms. Shweta Singh, JRF, Pharmaceutical Technology Division absent from 8th July 2013” stating thereby That “I am inform you that Ms Shweta Singh, JRF, Pharmaceutical Technology Division absent from 8th July 2013”. Copy of the letter dated 07.10.2013 is annexed as Annexure No. -3.
- On direction of Dr. Vijay Veer, Director, DRL, Ms. Shweta Singh, JRF got full stipend of the period while she was absent from DRL, Tezpur. Some complaint and RTI were filed by some persons in the matter therefore under pressure of PCDA, Dr. Vijay Veer ordered to Admin & Finance division to recover one month stipend from her. Rs. 17600/- was recovered vide letter 51/13/AE dated 28/10/2013. Copy of the letter No. 51/13/AE dated 28/10/2013 is annexed as Annexure No. -4. The same amount was deposited by Ms. Shweta Singh vide Chq. No. 508551 dated 8/5/2014. Copy of the letter dated 08/05/2014 sent from Mrs. Shweta Singh, SRF to Director, DRL regarding “Return of Excess Payment”, is annexed as Annexure No. -5.
- I submitted an application under RTI Act 2005 dated 26 July 2014 in the matter of Ms. Shweta Singh, JRF to CPIO, DRDO HQ, New Delhi but till date CPIO, DRDO did not replied. Copy of the application under RTI Act 2005 dated 26 July 2014 is attached as Annexure No. -6.
- Detailed attendance sheet of Ms. Shweta Singh from Biometric Punching Attendance System of said period may establish her long absence from DRL, Tezpur. But extra payment for only one month and three days of stipend was recovered from her by DRL, Tezpur on direction of Dr. Vijay Veer. Due to expose of the matter, DRL stopped her stipend with effect from 03 October 2013. Till date she did not get any stipend from DRL, Tezpur.
- As per the DO-II No. 07 dated 20.04.2012, her tenure for JRF was automatically ended on 02.10.2013. She was absent in month of October 2013 but Dr. Vijay Veer gave another big favor to her. He constituted an Assessment Committee consisting of three senior officers namely Dr. H.K. Gogoi, Scientist ‘F’, Shri Indrajeet Baruah, Scientist ‘F’ and Dr. P. Chattopadhyay, Scientist ‘D’ vide DO-II No. 07 dated 25.04.2014 to gave extension of one year to Fellowship of Ms. Shweta Singh, JRF with retrospective effect from 03.10.2013 while she was not present during said period in DRL, Tezpur and appointed her as SRF. Copy of the DO-II dated 25.04.2014 is annexed as Annexure No. -7. It was mentioned in said DO-II dated 25.04.2014 that “Extension of tenure of fellowship of the above named individual with effect from 3rd October 2013 for one year as per recommendation of the Assessment Committee held on 24th March 2014 at DRL, Tezpur”.
- As per DHRD, DRDO guidelines extension for one year can only be provided to a JRF candidate after his/her presentation before Assessment Committee constituted by Director well before the expiry of tenure of 02 years of the JRF.
- It is big manipulation and conspiracy that Ms. Shweta Singh never appeared before the Assessment Committee and she got extension of one year with retrospective effect by Assessment Committee vide DO-II No. 07 dated 25.04.2014. The said Assessment Committee was constituted by Dr. Vijay Veer, Director, DRL, Tezpur in the March 2014, which held the meeting on 24 March 2014.
- The recommendation of the Assessment Committee was approved by Dr. Vijay Veer, Director and Ms. Shweta Singh got extension for fellowship as SRF for one year from 03.10.2013 to 02.10.2014 vide DO-II No. 07 dated 25.04.2014.
- Surprisingly, while tenure of Ms. Shweta Singh, JRF was automatically ended on 02 October 2013 vide DO-II NO. 07 dated 20.04.2012, then why Dr. Vijay Veer allowed her to work in DRL, Tezpur till April 2014 and gave ex-post-facto sanction without any authority?
- Shweta Singh got married on 12 November 2013 and She was absent during the period from 03 October to 12 January 2014, then why DRL, Tezpur allowed her to join at DRL, Tezpur while her tenure was ended automatically on 02.10.2013?
- Extension for fellowship with retrospective effect is completely illegal as (i) Tenure of JRF remains only for two years, it cannot be extended in case of Ms. Shweta Singh as her term expired on 02 October 2013. (ii) With back date appointments/extensions to fellowship are not permissible under any rule of DRDO and GOI.
Hence extension to fellowship wef 03 October 2013 for one year by order dated 25.04.2014 is totally illegal and irregular. It should be cancelled.
- She was getting stipend of Rs. 16000/- per month as JRF and Rs. 18000/- per month as SRF.
- Under pressure of complaint to PCDA and RTI Application to CPIO, DRDO, DRL, Tezpur stopped the payment of her stipend with effect from 03 October 2014 up to till date. But to favor Ms. Shweta Singh, Dr. Vijay Veer ordered Finance Division to make bill for payment of stipend to Ms. Shweta Singh and accordingly a bill of approximately Rs. 2,12,439/- was made and sent to PCDA, New Delhi in February 2015 vide DRL letter No. 30/PAS/JRF/SRF/2014-2015 dated 02.02.2015. Copy of the bill sent to PCDA, New Delhi is annexed as Annexure No. -8.
- PCDA returned the said bill with following objections: (i) To submit attendance sheet of the Ms. Shweta Singh, (ii) Authority letter by which she was appointed as SRF by Director, DRL, Tezpur vide their letter dated 16.03.2015. Copy of the letter received to DRL, Tezpur dated 16.03.2015 from Accounts Officer, PCDA, Delhi is annexed as Annexure No. -9.
- Despite the above incidences, Dr. Vijay Veer again constituted Assessment Committee in November 2014 comprising of HK Gogoi, Scientist ‘F’, Dr. P. Chattopadhyay, Scientist ‘D’ , Dr. SN Dutta, Scientist ‘C’ and Shri S. Doley, TO ‘D’. This committee has a meeting on 24.11.2014 and recommended the 6 months extension to Ms. Shweta Singh, SRF for the fourth year. The minutes of the meeting was approved by Dr. Vijay Veer, Director, DRL, Tezpur on the same day 24.11.2014. Copy of the Minutes of Assessment Committee is annexed as Annexure No. -10.
- DRL, Tezpur has not submitted any reply to objections of PCDA till date and she did not get any payment since January 2014 to till date from DRL, Tezpur.
- Vijay Veer, Director, DRL, Tezpur is running this JRF-SRF business since his joining at DRL, Tezpur and normally per year 10-12 candidates being appointed by irregular means. Recently in the year 2014 and 2015 more than 25 vacancies were advertised. This year Interview going to held on 19 May 2015. Copy of the advertisement for the year 2014 and 2015 for recruitment of JRF, SRF and RA are annexed as Annexure No. -11 and Annexure No. -12.
Irregularities and Corruption by Dr. Vijay Veer in appointment of Shweta Singh, JRF
- Vijay Veer, Director, DRL, Tezpur unduly favored Ms. Shweta Singh and gave her an illegal extension in fellowship with intent to get pecuniary advantage to her by misusing his official position.
- Not only to her, Dr. Vijay Veer is giving high privileges to his father Shri V.P. Singh by allowing him to stay at DRL, Guest House since long time.
- This act of Dr. Vijay Veer amounts conspiracy against Government with ill motives to make a loss to public money and gave financial benefit to Ms. Shweta Singh by misusing his powers and official position by gross violation of DRDO Guidelines.
- Vijay Veer is attempted to make a payment of about Rs. 2,12,439/- in lump sum to Ms. Shweta Singh despite knowing her extension to fellowship was illegal.
- The said misconduct and misuse of power for giving pecuniary advantage to Ms. Shweta Singh, JRF by Dr. Vijay Veer, Director, DRL, Tezpur comes under section 13.(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act 1988.
In light of above evidences it is requested to you Sir, issue appropriate direction to Secretary, DRD, South Block, New Delhi to:
- Cancel the appointment order of Ms. Shweta Singh as JRF and SRF at DRL Tezpur and stop her payment till finalization of the complaint.
- Not to award Ph.D. degree to Ms. Shweta Singh as her appointment as SRF is illegal and she was absent during her tenure as JRF in 2013.
- Issue order to recover extra payment from Ms. Shweta Singh which DRL, Tezpur paid to her while she was on long absent from DRL, Tezpur for more than one year.
- Setup an enquiry against Dr. Vijay Veer under CCS (CCA) Rules 1965 and Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 to give undue favour to Ms. Shweta Singh, SRF, DRL, Tezpur.
- Cancel the recruitment process of JRF and SRF in DRL, Tezpur for the year 2015.
Regards
Prabhu Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun -248008 Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879, e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com website www.corruptionindrdo.com
Enclosed – Annexure No. 1 to 12.
Annexure-7
DO Part Order No – II No. 7 Dated 25/04/2014
(b) – MRS. SHWETA SINGH- JRF
Ref: – This Lab DO Part Order No – II No. 7 Dated 25/04/2012. Extension of tenure of the fellowship of the above named individual with effect from 3rd October 2013 for one year, as per recommendation of Assessment Committee held on 24th March, 2014 at DRL, Tezpur (Assam)
Nepotism says
There are several examples like Shweta Singh in DRL Tezpur. One Vijay Veer relative from Gwalior Mr. ? Yadav. Through investigation by MOD is urgently required. In tenure of Loku & Dhelu, DRL became hub for incompetent students to be appointed as JRF & SRF. Some of them are even not having eligibility for JRF.
Great exposure on DRL, hope MOD will take proper action in the Nepotism & Corruption by Vijay Veer & Company.
Anonymous says
JRF,SRF and RA business of DRDO should be closed as early as possible.
In Security & Intelligence organisation like DRDO why JRF, SRF, RA and Trainees are allowed? These are the source of information leakage to other departments when they left DRDO after there training etc. DRDO Scientists are just enjoying and using these JRF as their subordinates …. and showing JRF/SRF work in their APAR and Assessment. This is Reality of this JRF/ SRF /RA business of DRDO.
Like contractual labours, these JRF,SRF ,RA and Trainees are threat to DRDO/National Security. In most of the cases girls are appointed as JRF, SRF and RA (75%-80%) in whole DRDO.
Dear PDD Ji you may file RTI to DHRD, DRDO to get details of presently appointed JRF/SRF/RA etc in all DRDO labs, then you will know the inside story of HR policy of DRDO.
Vigilance says
There is no police verification for JRF etc. Even casuals are required to do police verification. Anybody with criminal background and bad integrity can becime jrf in drdo. In case like cited here, payment is made without presence. Great work going on at tejpur.
Jai Ho says
Recent appontment of JRF in DESIDOC is another example of napotism and manipulation in laid down rules. It is learnt that intimation to higher authority for this manipulated appointment and requests for vigilance enquiry was sent but nothing has came out so far.
A1 says
सारे कमीशन खाकर गलतियाँ करते है । उसे उजागर होने से डरते है।
PJ says
Dheelu ka pant theela hai.
JRF says
Dheelu ka sab kuch dheela hai, Dheelu ki to hai ajab hi Leela, like Ek Paheli Leela or like Ready song Main karoon toh saala …
Billu Badshah says
It is very unfortunate that such cases are coming up where bosses are giving all undue advantage by keeping all rules aside. Thorough investigation is required in above discussed case and other cases at DRLT Tejpur. JRF and Trainee become business and anybody can work as the JRF and trainer etc are by setting only and without police checking. During the last 2-3 years students came for training in some groups and subsequently became JRF amd SRF by jugad and pleasing few people by expensive gifts. Unbiased investigation is warranted. Many students paid from external agency are also working there purely on academic topics without any authority and antecedent varification. Why they are working still need investigation.
A well wisher of DRDO says
JRF,SRF BUSINESS SHOULD STOP IN THE INTEREST OF DRDO SECURITY.
IB says
Where is that JRF?
DRL continuing her or she left DRL, Tezpur.
Anonymous says
She is working at DRL without payment and staying at Govt quarter because anybody can work and stay at DRL by using money. And money is not a problem in this case. Everything for this case done by leading scientists, her thesis, papers done by other students (proof as photo and voice recordings available) and for final seminar also Dr Chatopadhay was deputed to attend and answer questions. After this complaint the DRL administration bacame superactive and managed her final PhD viva on 1 june 2015 in hurry taki PhD me koi dikkat na ayae. Again head of division take TD and attend the viva to manage the event smoothly. How can he take TD for this. DRL should start PhD bussiness legaly by taking money and depositing sone fixed % (decided by CDA rep) in govt fund.
Ask RTI from Guwahati univetsity:
1 Did Dr P Chatopadhay attend the PhD submision seminar and viva in this case.
2 Was he on official duty or leave (certified copy)
3 copy of thesis.
I honestly suggest to take deserving candidates if required and not to dump relatives and knowns kins in favourism and napotism.
Baba says
Chatto is big thief, he is now party in JRF scam.
He should save his job , why he is so interested in this JRF-SRF?
Vijay Veer is being transferred soon and JRF-SRF of Chatto is also leving DRL, then who will save Chatto?
GK says
Bhabhi Ji apka Chatto bigda jaye re.
समझ लो इशारा says
इतनी मेहरबानियाँ ना कर
रिसर्च भी तू करे और थीसिस भी टाइप करे
हवा की खुशबू पहचान लेता है जमाना
इतनी नादानियां भी ना कर.
Honey says
Daal Mein Kuch Kala Hai.
Anonymous says
May GOD save DRL Tezpur from the hands of these corrupt and selfish people sitting at top posotions.
PC says
All are rubbish, I am good Guide, Teacher & Brother.
Anonymous says
Dear PC, dont react so much, its alright. It will be soon decided by CVC as new CVC has taken over and he is very honest and strict. Though I am an outsider and dont know the matter still can smell foul play in this game. With my 25 year experience in DRDO I can assure that opening account in CVC is not good. You may have done this for somebody senior in pretext that they are boss and will safeguard you. But you are wrong. Everybody will go out leaving you alone.
Well Wisher says
Pronobesh you have did big mistake as you signed the thesis without carefully reading the UGC Guideline and Guwahati University Guidelines for Ph.D. You have involved yourself in fraudulent activity as within six month work nobody can complete the original R&D work to get Ph.D. degree.
I have seen the copy of the thesis and certificate signed by you as Guide. In several cases even guides have been convicted along with the researchers who submits fake thesis within fraudulent manner.
Be careful my dear Pronobesh.
Bhaiya says
Bhaiya Said: Peoples are forgotten the issue of attendance. The work is not 6 months perhaps she is join 2011and and almost all the students of same time out from DRL or some was left due to incompetency. Ask your teacher who teach you selflessly? Any University of the World can’t submit the thesis in 6 months. I have also seen the thesis and the residential periods is almost 4 years.
Better do the science some output might be come from in your hands what DRDO expect you.
Ask to Guwahati University how many project sanctioned from the DRL to the getting Ph.D of scientist?
May be asked the PI name and under the scientist completed the Ph.D?
What is the Outcome of the CARS project?
How many thesis as exact project title of the DRDO and fund is given by DRDO and benefited by the scientist or related to the project?
How many thesis has unclassified clarification and shortly the thesis will come in public domain as per UGC norms do you think it is right or not in scope of nation security?
Do you think the classified data can submitted to obtained Ph.D with the sacrificing Nation Security?
How many scientist are used the resources of DRDO including paper, manpower, vehicles etc?
Ask in RTI how many scientist doing the Ph.D under whom?
Justify yourself first and why unnecessary blaming the honest scientist who are working for the nations.
Bhaiya says
Peoples are forgotten the issue of attendance. The work is not 6 months perhaps she is join 2011and and almost all the students of same time out from DRL or some was left due to incompetency. Ask your teacher who teach you selflessly? Any University of the World can’t submit the thesis in 6 months. I have also seen the thesis and the residential periods is almost 4 years.
Better do the science some output might be come from in your hands what DRDO expect you.
Ask to Guwahati University how many project sanctioned from the DRL to the getting Ph.D of scientist?
May be asked the PI name and under the scientist completed the Ph.D?
What is the Outcome of the CARS project?
How many thesis as exact project title of the DRDO and fund is given by DRDO and benefited by the scientist or related to the project?
How many thesis has unclassified clarification and shortly the thesis will come in public domain as per UGC norms do you think it is right or not in scope of nation security?
Do you think the classified data can submitted to obtained Ph.D with the sacrificing Nation Security?
How many scientist are used the resources of DRDO including paper, manpower, vehicles etc?
Ask in RTI how many scientist doing the Ph.D under whom?
Justify yourself first and why unnecessary blaming the honest scientist who are working for the nations.
Office Office says
jane bhi do yaaro office office mein sab chalta hai. kyun tang kar rahe ho.
Experienced Scientist says
I had experience of 27 years and I know you PC. The great work you done for LLIN for introduction in Army and even though you had not qualified your candidature.
Confident you have right thing shows your attitude towards right teacher/researcher and save the scientific data as the DRL property to becoming an internal monitor. Jo data security ko smarthan karthe hey. The earlier thesis which are submitted to the university no internal monitor is there jo DRDO ka sampatti nehi hey. Because no financial disclosure, no intellectual disclosure is there. Professor, guide, scientist got benefited from other University and got their promotion by using API system of UGC and simply using the resources including financial support, manpower without scientific DRDO or DRL charter. Some external guide use the DRL scientist to complete their own external project just simply allocated the title and the same Ph.D data are submitted in project report which are in external financial support or in the University/ Research Institute annul reports ( free download can be done from their website) . Vice versa some scientist and JRF Ph.D data are submitted to the DRDO project report with the compulsory disclosure “the Institute embodies original work for Ph.D work”. I support you PC you stopped it.
I know you had done your work within the preview of the norms of rule and regulations of UGC. App itni behukuf to nehi ho jo six mounth me Ph. D kara denge aur Guhati University ve itna meherban nehi hey jo accept kar lenge. Aur itna dam ho to challenge kare Ph.D ko.
This question may be asked through RTI
1. How many CARS projects is running and the name of the principal investigator
2. How many CARS projects are given to adjoining University like Guhati, NEHU etc in last 7 years? (RTI to DRDO)
3. Name of the candidate awarded Ph. D after joining of DRDO or in process to award and their supervisor name
4. Abstract of the thesis which is awarded?
5. List of Publication leading to Ph.D of DRL scientist (Though it is available in web and found some has no publication as in first author or some publication more than 30 % scientific data plagiarism, it is matter of time to notify, some Ph.D thesis already downloaded )
6. Have any body appointed as internal supervisor? Suppose not then how the monitored their progress?
7. What are the conflict of interest disclosure of DRL
8. Any inanimate bond or “bound of obligation” in respect of the resources of DRL/DRDO used by Ph. D aspirant are taken in l.e.u security with valuation in terms of prejudice?
9. If not then how are allowed to perusing the Ph.D? What is the garuntee after obtain the Ph.D not leaving the Organization.
10. How many scientists take the advance increment after obtaining the Ph.D or reimbursed the Ph.D fees?
11. Right authority approval for perusing the Ph.D or perused Ph.D ?
12. what are the specific thesis title and the sanctioned project title of last ten years?
13. Is in the all thesis acknowledged that the resources of DRDO used or informed authority to submit the thesis? (Data classified/not-classified issue, will be tell at next posting)
14. If not then how the University accepted? Any action from Director or the right authority?
15. What are the disclosures of patents/ ownership of data/ responsibility of the concerned scientist and guide?
16. How many Ph.D submitted without internal guide including the JRF thesis?
17. What is the University recognized as the DRL is an approved centre?
18. How the course work is exempted? How they allow to attend to appear the Research Methodology and other two optional paper course work examination without attending class?
19. Any class for Ph.D arranged by DRL? If arrange please provide the certified copy (As per UGC Act 2009, 75 % attendance is compulsory to attend the course work examination)
20. Suppose it is an approved research centre then examination can carried out (As per Guhati University Ph.D ordinance but aspirant required to attend the class and required to arrange class by Research Centre) is it followed?
21. Any scientist/JRF is allowed to sabbatical leave for 6 months to attend the course work and those are registerd as full time scholar?
22. If not, then provide the approval of Director or other the facto approval certified copy
Aj itna rehno do, bahut ho hey.Mene second part me ap loko se security bare me bation ga, jo DRL ko data bahar me hey or Ph.D ka maja le rahe by using all resources of public money. Classified or Unclassified, norms of violation in security crime Ph.D tahet ve batonga jo savi ko akrshit karenge and second RTI key liye Prabuji ko guhar karenge. Pahele to RTI ka jabab ane do. Third part me ethics ka rule thorne ka bare mene bation ga, jo thesis Guhati University jama hey or kuch to web par upalapdh hey. Sabur karo, picture abhi bahut baki hey dost.
I had gone through the annual report and Ph.D awarded in the same sanctioned project. It is very crucial points how the work monitored, how the organization benefited or the laboratory benefited.
Majja aye na, mene bataunga key Ph.D kanoon keya hota hey.
Goswami says
Chor ki Dhadhi Mein Tinka.
Senior Scientist DRDE says
Scientists in DRDO are compromising their integrity and moral under pressure and to please Director for their own benefits like TD to Home town, APAR Marks, Promotion and good position in office. DRL is just one of the example in dirty pond of DRDO, There some young scientists like Dr. Chattopadhayaya, Dr. Meghvanshi and Mr. BJ Gogoi etc who compromised and blindly working illegal act to please Director. These activities are part of corruption under Prevention of Corruption Act, IPC and CCS(Conducts) Rules but they are not bothering about there future. They forget that favouritism and nepotism are part of corruption.
I am also unable to understand why one scientist so much favoured a JRF/SRF? What are his vested interest in the matter?
Since complaints have been made to higher authorities, Inquiry is sure then these scientists should defend themselves as Dheelu is running from DRL either to DRDE or DLS,HQ. Loku is managing his transfer and persuading one scientist of DRDE to give acceptance for new DRL, Director.
Annu M. says
Law Minister, Delhi Govt arrested in Fake Degree Case. DRDO Scientists & staff be careful as CEPTAM fake degree matter is under investigation.
JRF-SRF /Ph.D. degree business at DRL Tezpur is under probe at MOD.
Anonymous says
Is it true?
AK DAS says
Executing corrupt practices and wrong doing by following oral instruction amounts misconduct under CCS(Conducts) Rules. Follow only written orders of superiors otherwise “Tihad Jail Door Nahin”.