To, Dr. Amarpreet Duggal FirstAppellateAuthority ACC Cell, Cabinet Secretariat, Rashtrapati Bhavan, New Delhi-110011 Subject: First Appeal under Section 19(1) of RTI Act 2005 Reference: F. No. CABST/R/2014/60302-RTI dated 29 August 2014 Sir, Aggrieved by decision of Shri Rajesh Nagpal, Under Secretary & CPIO, under the provisions of Section 19(1) of RTI Act 2005, First […]
First Appeal – PCDA R&D
FIRST APPEAL U/S 19(1) OF Right to Information Act, 2005 To, Shri Devendra Kumar Sharma, IDAS Principal Controller PCDA (R&D), West Block-V R.K. Puram New Delhi-110066 Subject: First Appeal under Section 19(1) of RTI Act 2005 Reference Letter No. AN/RTI CELL/2013/j-p-sharma dated 06.09.2013 issued by CAPIO, PCDA(R&D) , New Delhi Letter […]
First Appeal – Sh R K Agarwal’s False Claim
FIRST APPEAL U/S 19(1) OF Right to Information Act, 2005 To, Shri Surjan Pal, OS & Director DECS First Appellate Authority, DRDO RTI Cell, Room No. 240/B, DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg New Delhi-110011 Subject: First Appeal under Section 19(1) of RTI Act 2005 Reference: No.DEAL/RTI/0010/2013 dated 3rd September 2013 Sir, As I am aggrieved by […]
First Appeal – Sou moto Disclosure on officials tours of Ministers and other officials
FIRST APPEAL U/S 19(1) OF Right to Information Act, 2005 To, Shri Surjan Pal, OS & Director DECS, First Appellate Authority, DRDO RTI Cell, Room No. 240/B, DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg New Delhi-110011 Subject: First Appeal under Section 19(1) of RTI Act 2005 Reference: Letter No. DMS/0369/RTI/101/45/Letter_2013 dated 26 August 2013 issued by PIO, DMSRDE, […]
First Appeal – Procurement of Scientific & Technical Books in Technical Library of DMSRDE
FIRST APPEAL U/S 19(1) OF Right to Information Act, 2005 To, Shri Surjan Pal, OS & Director DECS, First Appellate Authority, DRDO RTI Cell, Room No. 240/B, DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg New Delhi-110011 Subject: First Appeal under Section 19(1) of RTI Act 2005 Reference: Letter No. DMS/0369/RTI/101/41/Letter_2013 dated 26 August 2013 issued by PIO, DMSRDE, […]
First Appeal – Development of Bullet Proof Jacket under GSQR-1293 by DMSRDE
FIRST APPEAL U/S 19(1) OF Right to Information Act, 2005 To, Shri Surjan Pal, OS & Director DECS First Appellate Authority, DRDO RTI Cell, Room No. 240/B, DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg New Delhi-110011 Subject: First Appeal under Section 19(1) of RTI Act 2005 Reference: Letter No. DMS/0369/RTI/101/44/Letter_2013 dated 26 August 2013 issued by PIO, DMSRDE, […]
First Appeal – Development of Bullet Proof Jacket under GSQR-1318 in DMSRDE – DRDO Hqrs
FIRST APPEAL U/S 19(1) OF Right to Information Act, 2005 To, Shri Surjan Pal, OS & Director DECS First Appellate Authority, DRDO RTI Cell, Room No. 240/B, DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg New Delhi-110011 Subject: First Appeal under Section 19(1) of RTI Act 2005 Reference: Letter No. RTI/01/2091/P/2013/0196 dated 23 August 2013 issued […]
First Appeal – Development of Bullet Proof Jacket under GSQR-1318 in DMSRDE
FIRST APPEAL U/S 19(1) OF Right to Information Act, 2005 To, Shri Surjan Pal, OS & Director DECS, First Appellate Authority, DRDO RTI Cell, Room No. 240/B, DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg New Delhi-110011 Subject: First Appeal under Section 19(1) of RTI Act 2005 Reference: Letter No. DMS/0369/RTI/101/40/Letter_2013 dated 20 August 2013 issued […]
First Appeal – Development of Bullet Proof Jacket in DMSRDE
FIRST APPEAL U/S 19(1) OF Right to Information Act, 2005 To, Shri Surjan Pal, OS & Director DECS, First Appellate Authority, DRDO RTI Cell, Room No. 240/B, DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg New Delhi-110011 Subject: First Appeal under Section 19(1) of RTI Act 2005 Reference: Letter No. DMS/0369/RTI/101/39/Letter_2013 dated 20 August 2013 issued by […]
How DRDO respects CIC orders- Case – I
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Room No. 308, B-Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066 File No.CIC/LS/A/2012/001209 Appellant Shri Rajiv Chauhan Public Authority DRDO Date of hearing 09.08.2012 Date of decision 09.08.2012 Facts :- 1. Heard today dated 09.08.2012. Appellant present. DRDO is represented by Shri Deepak Mishra, Scientist ‘E’. 2. It is the appellant’s […]
