To 20-11-2019 Wg Cdr Suman Adhikari, CPIO, Room No. 160, Dte of PS, Air HQ (VB), Rafi Marg, New Delhi 110
Hello, Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of appeal submitted to Higher Court by BEL against order of Justice Suresh Kumar Kait dated October 9, 2019 to respondents are directed to reinstate the petitioners Sh M.M. Pandey, General Manager (Product Support), Sh R.K. Goyal, Senior Deputy General Manager (Vigilance), and Sh Sumit Krishna, Manager, (Product Support).
As per appeal page no 49 and 50 para xi line 5 – In this regard on 25-09-2019 the Asstt,
Chief of Air Staff vide his confidential letter has brought to notice of the
CMD, BEL that confidential documents relating to the said contract have been
found in the custody of un authorized elements and that: owing to the
sensitivity of the project involving national
security, investigation in this regard be carried out on highest priority and
report submitted at the earliest.
Provide that above mention
confidential letter dated 25-09-2109 whether sent to CMD, BEL by Asstt, Chief
of Air Staff. Yes or No
Does Air force taken any action against un authorized elements who possesses the sensitive project
information Yes or No
IACCS project sites security
managed by Air Force or BEL.
IACCS project sites CCTV
is managed by Air Force or BEL
IACCS project sites
contractors manpower verified by police Yes or No
Whether IACCS project
sites In-charge verify that the contractor manpower is from authorized contractors like L&T or from unauthorized
Sublette contractor like C S Construction or S R Ashok etc.
Whether IACCS Directorate or
Asstt, Chief of Air Staff above aware the unauthorized Sublette working equation
of BEL in IACCS sites Yes or No
Mr. Udaya Shankara K S AGM (Marketing), CPIO, Bharat Electronics Limited Corporate Office, Outer Ring Road, Nagavara, Bangalore – 560 045
Hello, Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of Office order no. No.005/VGL/4 Government of India Central Vigilance Commission Circular No. 31/9/06. Subject-Posting of details on award of tenders/contracts on websites/bulletins, copy enclosed. It is observed that BEL, Website suddenly stopped Posting of details on award of tenders/contracts eProcuement-SRM after media published the Rs 7900 Cr scam in Air force IACCS Project.
1.Provide the date and time of stopping Posting of details on award of tenders/contracts on BEL Website eProcuement-SRM
2.Provide the name of authority who place the order to stopping Posting of details on award of tenders/contracts on BEL Website eProcuement-SRM
3.Provide if details of efforts to restart Posting of details on award of tenders/contracts on BEL Website eProcuement-SRM
4.Provide details and copy of letter if any orders received from BEL CMD Office for stopping Posting of details on award of tenders/contracts on BEL Website eProcuement-SRM
Whether BEL take any policy decision not to Posting of details on award of tenders/contracts on BEL Website eProcuement-SRM then provide the details therof.
Address Room No. 160, Dte of PS, Air HQ (VB), Rafi Marg, New Delhi 110106
Facts leading to appeal:
An application under Section 6(1) of RTI Act 2005 dated 3 May 2019 was submitted to CPIO Air Hq sought information on IACCS project executed by costing approx 7900 Cr as new series posted in various media regarding scam in IACCS project. Being a senior citizen and tax payer I have request for some facts which are not in nature of any strategic information. It is hard to believe that CPIO not denial nor gave requested information judiciously, send reply without application of mind. Copy of RTI application is attached as Enclosure-1.
2. Particulars of Decision/Order of CPIO against which appeal:-
Request information in Para
3 is not provide by CPIO Air Hq and
mentioned – not held with this Public Authority, the IACCS directorate in same
building and as per RTI act CPIO has to transfer under section 6 (3) of the RTI
Act 2005 to concern CPIO of Air Hq who is responsible for IACCS Directorate.
Request information in Para
4 is not provide by CPIO Air Hq quoted
that “not held with this Public Authority”, But CPIO has to transfer
under section 6 (3) of the RTI Act 2005 to concern CPIO of Air Hq who is responsible for IACCS Directorate
Request
information in Para 7 the CPIO, Air Hq not even denied or mention that
information is not available with him, just ignored. Here a big question arise
that the vision of RTI Act 2005 is to restrict the corrupt practices prevailing
in the system should be checked by citizen of India. The CPIO act clearly shows
that he want protect these corrupt practices running in Air force, because in Para
8 also CPIO even not mention any word just ignored the request of
information.
The act of CPIO to ignore the request of Para 7 & 8 shows that CPIO, Air Hq does not believe the constitutional provision of India. The request of information from common citizen is nothing to CPIO, but CPIO want to save culprits..
3. Facts & Grounds leading to appeal:-
the information requested are purely related to corruption and for to take corrective measures to restrict prevailing corruption in defence sector which is very highly dangerous to our national security. Compromising with quality and quantity and encouraging the false documents in procurement and execution in such important project is not anyway appreciable by common country man.
Information not providing
vide Para 7 & 8 itself prove that official sitting on seat are not thinking
of our future Air Force officials who will going to work their duties in IAACS
project centers, basically they are playing with the life of children may be
some present Air Force official’s sons
or daughters who wishes to join Air Force like their father.
The CVO reports shows that Air force deputed in these palaces not allowed the senior vigilance officer to visit site and other way they allowed to any tom dick harry of L&T subletting contractor to roam around. Secondly in IACCS Directorate are co-operting BEL corrupt offices in big way.
4, Prayer /relief sought for:-
Information sought vides RTI Application dated 03.05. 2019 by appellant has been not provided properly it is incomplete information given by CPIO, Air Hq. Therefore, appellant kindly prays to FAA, Air Hq to allow this appeal and issue instructions/orders to CPIO, Air HQ to provide the information sought as seek by appellant vide his RTI Application dated 03 05 2019. Hope FAA will prove that FAA with “Nabha Sprsham Deeptam” not with corrupt officials who are busy with minting money and compromising with national security and also playing with life of our future Air Force aspirants.
5. Declaration:-
I
hereby state that the information and particulars given above are true to the
best of my knowledge and belief.
Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of appointments of retired DRDO official as consultant, adviser or any other designation
Provide total number of appointments of retired DRDO official as consultant, adviser or any other designation who are currently holding the post.
Provide the names and place of posting and field specialization of posted official.
Provide the policy of BEL for recruitment in such appointment.
Provide the selection procedure for such appointments.
Whether BEL take any clearance like vigilance or APAR etc. from DRDO before appointment of such retired official of DRDO. Yes or No
If yes then provide the nature of clearance from DRDO.
Provide the service tenure of such appointments and whether any age restriction or age limit for appointment.
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005 in respect of Dr D. P Singh, Estate Manager, DRDO, Dehradun. RTI Act 2005 first amended DRDO was included for exemption list of Section 24. It was clear that information related to corruption and human right violation is not included in above exemption. But unfortunately the DRDO made mockery of RTI Act 2005 and declared himself dictatorially that they are fully exempted as they keep their eyes closed on corruption or human rights angles requested by RTI applicant.
Now here is challenge to CPIO, DRDO that ignore the proofs enclosed with this RTI application and give your standard reply that DRDO exempted in RTI Act.
Enclosed photograph no 1 of Scorpio Vehicle (UK 07 AR 0900) painted with EMU, DRDO, Ministry of Deference, Dehradun, using by Dr D. P Singh, Estate Manager, DRDO, Dehradun. The Vehicle registered in the name of KHUSHAL SINGH, UK07AR0900 RISHIKESH ARTO, UK. KHUSHAL SINGH is contractor who is looking all guest houses under EMU, DRDO, Dehradun
Enclosed photograph no 2 of Scorpio Vehicle (UK 07 AR 0900) dated 26th August working day Hav Rakesh Sharma, posted in EMU, DRDO Dehradun picked Mr Uniyal a private person at 07:46 and moved out to Dehradun. Vehicle crossed Uttarakhand border 08:17.
Enclosed photograph no 3 Tata Maza driving by CHM Tajindra Singh posted in EMU, DRDO Dehradun joined and moved 08:30.
All above photographs were posted in real time on what’s up account of SSP, Dehradun, Major Manish Thapa, Military Intelligence.
Provide the contract details of EMU, DRDO, Dehradun for Scorpio Vehicle (UK 07 AR 0900) for last three years.
Provide the contract details of EMU, DRDO, Dehradun for Scorpio Vehicle (UK 07 AR 0900 current financial year.
Provide the authority given DRDO competent official to Dr D. P Singh, Estate Manager, DRDO, Dehradun for using such name logos like Bharat Sarkar, Raksha Mantralay, EMU, DRDO.
The duties details of Hav Rakesh Sharma, CHM Tajindra Singh and Dr D. P Singh, Estate Manager, DRDO, Dehradun on 26th August 2016, since with private party it was not official or secret mission.
List of contract employees provided by contractor Khushal Singh, as per contract roaster Mr Nandu, Mr Heera, Mr. Govind and Mr Tara are regularly permanent basis working in Dr D. P Singh, Estate Manager Residence since long. Mr Nandu and Mr Tara are staying 24 hrs in Dr D. P Singh residence.
To, Date 18th May 2015 Shri P.K. Singh, Under Secretary, CPIO, Ministry of Agriculture, Krishi Bhawan, Patel Chowk, New Delhi-110011
Subject: RTI request related to approval of Registration Committee (RC)
Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of allowing by Registration Committee (RC) of Ministry of Agriculture to DRL, DRDO to use of Long Lasting Insecticidal Net (LLIN) containing Deltamethrin 0.15 w/w (55 mg a.i./sq.m.) and Pypernyl butoxide 0.55% w/w (160 mg a.i./sq.m.) u/s 9(3) for Defence and Paramilitary Forces.
As per MINUTES OF 352nd MEETING OF REGISTRATION COMMITTEE (RC) HELD ON 11.12.2014 IN THE ICAR COMMITTEE ROOM NO. 1, GROUND FLOOR, KRISHI BHAWAN, NEW DELHI.
Point No 5.15 – Consideration of an application of M/s Defence Research Laboratory, DRDO, Tezpur, Assam for grant of registration of indigenous manufacture of Long Lasting Insecticidal Net (LLIN) containing Deltamethrin 0.15 w/w (55 mg a.i./sq.m.) and Pypernyl butoxide 0.55% w/w (160 mg a.i./sq.m.) u/s 9(3B).
Committee – Approved for a period of two years, for public health programme only subject to approval of DAC for commercialization, the shelf life of the product is allowed two years. Appropriate conditions may be incorporated in CR/Label Leaflet.
Provide the certified copy of application of DRL, DRDO, Tezpur Assam for grant of registration of indigenous manufacture of Long Lasting Insecticidal Net (LLIN) containing Deltamethrin 0.15 w/w (55 mg a.i./sq.m.) and Pypernyl butoxide 0.55% w/w (160 mg a.i./sq.m.) u/s 9(3B).
Provide the certified copy of DAC for commercialization.
Provide the copy of investigation or validation report on the use of Deltamethrin 0.15 w/w (55 mg a.i./sq.m.) and Pypernyl butoxide 0.55% w/w (160 mg a.i./sq.m.) for Long Lasting Insecticidal Net (LLIN) from any certified apex agency if any, if not then approval noting of chairman.
To 17th March 2015
Sh. Sekhar Ranjan Amin,
U/Secretary & CPIO,
Room No 340, Office of Director of Vigilance,
B- Wing Sena Bhawan,
Rajaji Marg, New Delhi -110105
Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of corruption complaints against Dr A K Saxena, Director, DMSRDE, DRDO, Kanpur & other officials. The period of complaints is from 29/11/2013 to 11/06/2014.
1.Provide the current status of my following complaints
I.Dated 29/11/2013 OM No 1323/2014/vigilance 9, forwarded to CVO, MoD on 30/01/2014 for necessary action.
II.Dated 17/12/2013 OM No 2056/2014/vigilance 9, forwarded to CVO, MoD on 19/02/2014 for necessary action
III.Dated 24/12/2013 OM No 5022/2014/vigilance 9, forwarded to CVO, MoD on dated 27/03/2014 for necessary action
IV.Dated 26/12/2013 OM No 4979/2014/vigilance 9, forwarded to CVO, MoD on dated 27/03/2014 for necessary action
V.Dated 22/1/2014 OM No 5387/2014/vigilance 9, forwarded to CVO, MoD on dated 31/03/2014 for necessary action
VI.Dated 7/1/2014 OM No 3617/2014/vigilance 9, forwarded to CVO, MoD on dated 14/03/2014 for necessary action
VII.Dated15/1/2014 OM No 3574/2014/vigilance 9, forwarded to CVO, MoD on dated 10/03/2014 for necessary action
VIII.Dated 11/6/2014 OM No 13248/2014/vigilance 9, forwarded to CVO, MoD on dated 24/06/2014 for necessary action
2.CVO, MoD forwarded to DRDO vigilance vide MoD ID note No. 63/DO/ (Vig)/CVC/2014 dated 17/06/2014 with request to submit consolidated report on the complaints against Dr A.K. Saxena and others of DMSRDE, DRDO, Kanpur at the earliest. Please provide the copy of reply of DRDO against your request.
3.Provide copies of replies received by CVO,MoD against above complaints.
To 27th April 2015 Sh A. M. Manichan, Under Secretary (IC-IV), CPIO, Ministry of Defence,Department of Defence, Sena Bhavan, New Delhi
Hello, Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005 in respect of representation submitted by Dr V Ramchandra, Sc G, ADE, DRDO Bangalore through CPGRAMS vide DDRDO/E/2015/00066 dated 8/4/2015, regarding, Harassment and torture in suitable work assignment.
As per today The New Indian Express Bangalore edition page 4 Director ADE P Srikumar said he was not aware of any such complaint.
The DOP letter no DOP/11/110/108/CPGRAMS/M/01 dated 9th April 2015 signed by Ms Mukta Chauhan, Dy Director (Pers) for staff grievances officer, DRDO
Provide all action taken in this matter by ADE,DRDO
Provide the date of receiving of above DOP letter by ADE Director, P Sri Kumar
Provide Comment and action of P Sri Kumar, Director, ADE on subject matter.
Note the requested information is in larger interest because ADE is involve in very important projects and country is witnessing the unprecedented delays in LCA, Rustom and day to day corruption cases are coming up. If Dr V Ramachandra senior scientist is suffering from harassment torture then what about the junior scientists and technical staff, it is clear cut violation of human right. It is not single case earlier similarly Dr R K Gupta, Sc H, ASL, Hyderabad also sent representation to PMO.
To 23 April 2015 Hon’ble Shri Narendra Modi, Prime Minister, PMO, Room No 152 South Block , New Delhi-110011
SUBJECT:- Misuse of Public Money by making Temporary Duty for personal work or visit native place to meet family member by Dr. Vijay Veer, Director, DRL, DRDO, Tezpur.
Sir,
The office of PCDA (R&D) is public authority under purview of RTI Act 2005 and this office is having own independent CPIO and First Appellate Authority. PCDA (R&D) is not an exempted organisation under section 24 of RTI Act 2005, despite the CPIO, PCDA (R&D) deliberately denying the information related to Establishment Matters of DRDO officials like tour details, LTC details, procurement related information etc just to cover up the corrupt practices of DRDO officials. The main objective of PCDA (R&D) should be to minimise the corruption and save the public money.
In my several RTI’s , CPIO, PCDA(R&D) either denied the information under section 24 of the RTI Act 2005 or transferred the RTI’s to DRDO under section 6(3) of RTI Act 2005, which is unethical practice to promote corruption and non-transparency in the Government System.
Therefore, RTI for CPIO, PCDA (R&D) through PMO with kind request to give order to PCDA (R&D) to follow RTI Act 2005 with true & proper sprit and provide information by strictly following the provisions of RTI Act 2005.
PMO may explore tour details of Dr. Vijay Veer from 01 March 2012 to 31 March 2015 to verify Director misusing official powers for personal gain.
Regards
Prabhu Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun
To 23 April 2015 Smt. Kavita Garg, IDAS, CPIO, PCDA (R&D), West Block-V, R K PURAM,NEW DELHI- 110066
Madam, Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of tour details of Dr. Vijay Veer, Director,DRL, Tezpur from 01 March 2012 to 31 March 2015. .
Copies of all official tour programs from 01 March 2012 to 31 March 2015.
Copies of all the movement orders for his all tour from 01 March 2012 to 31 March 2015.
The details of flying points in specified performa prescribed by LAO, New Delhi.
The information sought is pertaining to allegations of corruption as such not exempted under section 24 of RTI Act 2005.
Dr. Vijay Veer assumed the charge of Director of DRL, Tezpur on 01 March 2012. His wife Dr. Neena Chauhan is serving as Scientist E at Forest Research Institute, Dehradun since beginning of her carrier.
Dr. Vijay Veer is having three immovable properties at Dehradun and his native place is Dehradun.
In Tezpur it was observed that Dr. Vijay Veer is signing his tour program himself while in any other Establishment/Lab of DRDO, Director’s tour programs are signed by CAO/SAO-I/AO/Account Officer.
He is not submitting joining report after tour along with confirmation on Movement Order that he visited to the place for which he made Temporary Duty. Frequent TD resulted, R&D activities of the DRL has been badly suffered. The administration is in bad shape, various CAT cases is the proof DRL scenario.
Surprisingly, Dr. Vijay Veer was on TD even during the marriage & reception of his son at Dehradun in May 2013.
