To 27th April 2015 Hon’ble Shri Manohar Parrikar, Defence Minister,Room No -104, South Block, New Delhi-110011
SUBJECT: DEFENCE SECRET IN DANGER, DIRECTOR, DRL, DRDO TEZPUR’s DIRECTOR SECRETARIAT MANAGED BY CONTRACTUAL LABOUR AS PERSONNEL SECRETARY
Sir, Yesterday (26th April 2015) The Sunday Standard first page news was “Defence Secret is in Danger”
In this reference, DRDO having lot of examples, DRDO is only one department where you can find contractual manpower above age of 70 or below 18 years. People may be think that because of their high skill expertise DRDO might been engage such manpower, but matter of fact this practice adopted DRDO is only for those who are having good number of secrets or having evidences of wrong doings of DRDO bosses.
In ASL you will find people working since last more than 10 years after retirements, scientists, Technical Officers, who are experts in manpower/ logistic manipulations while missile firing, even JCDA retired account officer etc who are expertise in bill clearance from CDA. These specialized contractual having good assets that can be verified by agencies.
One major observation on these contract appointments is the not following the proper police verification.
ACEM, Nasik campus one murder was done by a contract’s man who has criminal records.
HEMRL GOCO contract labor business, the police verification was done on single list basis one stamp of Thana solved the problem and best part of this these hundreds of contract labours handle the high class explosive TATB.
For example in ADE, DRDO. Bangalore more than 170 B.Tech contract employees are working in core area for mare Rs 12000 and same time scientists who are getting hefty salaries Rs 80000 to 1.5 Lakhs are looking stores /admin /horticulture /works / security /Library etc
This Mail received by website www.corruptioninddo.com on Thu, 30 Oct 2014 01:19:10 IP: 49.206.192.222
HELLO SIR
all of us know about DRDL it is a dream job org to every one. but please think about contract employees. My husband is also working in DRDO RCI he is engineering graduate. From past 2 years he is working but he is getting 14k. how we can Liv with family in Hyderabad and this year no increments… we are not dreaming about permanent job….. my small wish is to get better pay… for the same job a permanent employee getting nearly 4ok but contract employee getting only 12+.but work is same for both. am not asking to give 4o to contract people just i want to say please provide increments at least…this is not only my wish… i hope u can think & talk about this……….
if i made any mistake please excuse me….. Defence Minister Sir, hope you will take this above mail seriously
Following one example case of DRL, DRDO, Tezpur for your sharp analysis of this DRDO’s contract business.
Sh.M.L. Roy is an ex-employee of Defence Research Laboratory (DRL), Tezpur who superannuated on 31 Dec 2008
He was posted at Director Secretariat as Personal Assistant/Personal Secretary to Director, DRL, Tezpur prior to his superannuation from DRL, Tezpur.
Right from his superannuation on 31 Dec 2008, he was start working at DRL, Tezpur as contractual Laborer and posted at Director He is engaged in all sensitive work like computerized compiling of materials in Director’s Office, monitoring and maintenance of important files of Director Office which has already been mentioned in his contract.
Since last 7 years continuously working in DRL, Tezpur as Personal Secretary (PS) to Director, DRL, and Tezpur by means of several private vendors / supplier/security agencies.
M.L. Roy is presently of 65 +years age and not fit for this job as in this sensitive post any private contractual labour should not be appointed while several young skilled manpower is available in DRL, Tezpur.
DRL, Tezpur having permanent staff Sh S K Sharma as PS ‘C’ but he was not assigned the right job.
Interestingly Sh M L Roy working for Rs 5000 – Rs 6000 only as Jan 2015 Salary was Rs 5764.00
Sh M L Roy working as mole for vendors, each and every file of procurements / recruitments/ transfer postings/temporary duties etc. moves from Director’s office.
Sir, it is requested kindly order for extensive survey of to explore the necessity of this contract business in DRDO. Because like Director, DEAL Sh R C Agarwal used these contract labour for kitchen gardening, to clean utensils, to wash his wife’s petticoats etc, when this issue published on website Sh R C Agarwal stopped using these labours. This British legacy are maintaining by DRDO directors and senior officers. I am enclosing two photographs of a contract labour is busy to wash his boss personal car in DRL, Tezpur campus
To 27th April 2015 Sh A. M. Manichan, Under Secretary (IC-IV), CPIO, Ministry of Defence,Department of Defence, Sena Bhavan, New Delhi
Hello, Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005 in respect of representation submitted by Dr V Ramchandra, Sc G, ADE, DRDO Bangalore through CPGRAMS vide DDRDO/E/2015/00066 dated 8/4/2015, regarding, Harassment and torture in suitable work assignment.
As per today The New Indian Express Bangalore edition page 4 Director ADE P Srikumar said he was not aware of any such complaint.
The DOP letter no DOP/11/110/108/CPGRAMS/M/01 dated 9th April 2015 signed by Ms Mukta Chauhan, Dy Director (Pers) for staff grievances officer, DRDO
Provide all action taken in this matter by ADE,DRDO
Provide the date of receiving of above DOP letter by ADE Director, P Sri Kumar
Provide Comment and action of P Sri Kumar, Director, ADE on subject matter.
Note the requested information is in larger interest because ADE is involve in very important projects and country is witnessing the unprecedented delays in LCA, Rustom and day to day corruption cases are coming up. If Dr V Ramachandra senior scientist is suffering from harassment torture then what about the junior scientists and technical staff, it is clear cut violation of human right. It is not single case earlier similarly Dr R K Gupta, Sc H, ASL, Hyderabad also sent representation to PMO.
Subject: Corruption Complaints Status against Dr A K Saxena, Director, DMSRDE,DRDO, Kanpur & other officials working with him (Complaints during period from 29/11/2013 to 11/06/2014)
Sir,
Please find enclosed Corruption Complaints Status against Dr A K Saxena, Director, DMSRDE, DRDO, Kanpur & other officials working with him (Complaints during period from 29/11/2013 to 15/01/2014).
All complaints sent to CVC with documentary evidences till date no action was taken by DRDO hqrs because Ex Secretary, DRD, SA to RM, DG, DRDO Sh Avinash Chander patronized Dr A K Saxena, Director, DMSRDE.
DRDO hqrs constituted two fact finding committees to investigate the complaints. First fact finding committee under chairmanship of Dr S S Negi, Sc ‘H’ only grope the complaints and smell only the hands of Sh Navin Prakash Gupta, Sc ‘C’ and Sh R P Bhatt, Sc ‘F’. Rest real findings buried under the Sh Avinash chander’s table because that time Dr S S Negi was in the race of IRDE Lab directorship.
Based on his unconstitutional (because the fact finding committee jurisdiction is only find the facts and handover those facts to competent authority not to give any suggestions) suggestions DRDO hqrs transferred both scientists from DMSRDE, Kanpur and gave hurdle free play ground to Dr A K Saxena’s team to collect as much run (Gandhi) from the unrequited, low specifications items/ machineries etc from unqualified vendors. (Dr A K Singh, DOP submitted an affidavit in Allahabad court that on the basis of first fact finding committee’s suggestions DRDO transferred Sh Navin Prakash Gupta, Sc ‘C’ to DRL, Tezpur)
The copy emails are a security threat waning in the concern of defence preparedness as these emails exposes that vendors are know the all future plans of DRDO R&D that what they are planning to develop and what are their aim & objects. But unfortunately our responsible post holders are ignoring such activities of their beloved ones.
Second fact finding committee under chairmanship of Dr D.C. Pande, Sc’H’ , LRDE, Bangalore visited DMSRDE and grilled Dr A K Saxena’s team but delayed the report waited up to result of Distinguished Scientist. Unfortunately Dr D.C. Pande not able to achieved goal, submitted report. In the mean time Sh Avinash Chander hold his position very strongly and showed his lousy power by making Ms Tessy Thomas as Director, ASL and her husband Cmdr S K Patel director QRS with violation of all rules regulation, with this success he kicked the second fact finding report proudly in to dustbin.
It is requested that it is high time top show DRDO’s corrupt scientists that you are paid for science and development not for making fun ride with vendors. ( like Director, GTRE, Mohan Rao who caught by Karnataka police in massage parlor with Israeli company rep) The technology is so powerful that now 250 crores eyes are watching corrupt official’s each and every move.
The following table will show you clear picture of handling corruption complaints related to DRDO. The massage is to all corrupt officials is that nothing will happen to anyone so enjoy life with corrupt practices.
Your early needful action in this matter required. The all honest DRDO officials are waiting the decision so they can feel the difference of new fare governance.
Regards
Prabhu Dandriyal, 21-Sunderwala, Raipur,
Dehradun-248008
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com website www.corruptionindrdo.com
Corruption Complaints Status against Dr A K Saxena, Director, DMSRDE, DRDO, Kanpur & other officials working with himCorruption Complaints Status against Dr A K Saxena, Director, DMSRDE, DRDO, Kanpur & other officials working with him (Complaints during period from 29/11/2013 to 11/06/2014)
Mr.Chander – Honest scientists of DRDO shocked when you delayed result of scientist ‘H’ in 2013 and October when they seen the name of Ms Tessy Thomas who superseeded well deserved.
DRDO shocked when you made Ms Tessy Thomas as Director, ASL ignoring the deserve ones
DRDO scientists again shocked when you advertised tailor made post for Ms Tessy Thomas’s husband CMDR Saroj Patel and selected him and made director without fear of Government rules and GOD
DRDO honest scientist were shocked when you protected Dr A K Saxena after seeing all documentary evidences of corruption and instead to save the national interest punished honest scientists.
List is very long………………
So don’t pretend that you shocked to hear government decision, now your best friend is sitting in government hope he will going to give you more shocks.
Sh A K Antony gave responsibility to find out the truth of appointment of Ms Swati Srivastava as scientist ‘B’ post by RAC.
The nation is witnessed that same person first gave clean chit under influence of corrupt officials of DRDO and now he has approved the order of annulment the appointment of Ms Swati Srivastava. Unfortunately, the country of 125 crores population, our government is not able to found any honest and responsible person for secretary, DRD, DG, DRDO and SA to RM post.
They are still shielding concern duo (Father Daughter) and other involved officials by terming the illegal recruitment of Ms Swati Srivasta as irregular appointment with the clear motive of department escape from the duty of lodging of criminal case against the manipulation done under the influence of Dr Arun Kumar in the direct recruitment of Ms Swati Srivastava in RAC Delhi
Hope Modi ji will look seriously this very important issue it is directly related to moral of our honest scientist whose fortune / fate is in hand of such man who has no respect of moral and honesty who only believes in his own growth.
Jaihind
Central Administrative Tribunal – Delhi
Dr. Arun Kumar vs Union of India on 24 November, 2012
Principal Bench, New Delhi
OA No. 3293/2012
Reserved on : 09.11.2012 Pronounced on : 24.11.2012
Ho’ ble Mr. Justice Syed Rafat Alam, Chairman, Hon’ble Dr. Ramesh Chandra Panda, Member (A)
Para 9
Seen. This is serious. As already ordered, a fresh inquiry into the allegations of irregularity by an independent agency against Dr. Arun Kumar, the then Director, RAC may be got conducted immediately. It may also be inquired as to how my note sheet containing specific orders to this effect is missing from the file.
/sd/(A.K. Antony)Raksha Mantri11th March, 2011
Para 10. Pursuant to the above directions, a High Power Inquiry Committee was constituted to inquire into the allegations of irregularities against the applicant with the approval of RM videhis order dated 15.07.2011 with following Members:
(i) Dr. S. K. Salwan, former Director, ARDE, Pune and Vice Chancellor, Bhagwant University, Ajmer;
(ii) Dr. Avinash Chander, Distinguished Scientist and Director, ASL, Hyderabad;
(iii) Mrs. Nabnit R. Krishnan, Director DMIST.
The Enquiry Committee enquired into the matter and submitted its report on 08.06.2012. The executive summary of the report was placed before RM indicating that the Inquiry Committee opined that no favour or undue advantage was given to Ms. Swati Srivastava, daughter of the applicant during her recruitment as Scientist ‘B’ in DRDO and the same was conducted following normal practices and procedures. The file was processed through SA to RM who recorded the following on 15.07.2011:
“The report of the Independent Enquiry Committee”. Constituted to investigate the appointment of Mr. Swati Shrivastava D/o of Dr. Arun Kumar, is placed opposite for perusal of Hon’ble RM.
The above recording was endorsed by the RM by signing on 18.07.2011.
The copy of DRDO order of annul of appointment of Ms Swati Srivastava, Scientist C, daughter of Dr Arun Kumar, Ex-DOP. The Order is signed by Dr A K Singh, DOP (another gem of DRDO)
To, 16th September 2014
Dr. RB Sharma, CPIO
DRDO HQ, Min. of Defence
DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg
New Delhi-110011
Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of Sri Saroj Kumar Patel, Scientist G who has been appointed as Director, Directorate Quality, Reliability & Safety (QRS) with effect from 31 March 2014 vide order No. DOP/05/53269/DQR&S/M/02 dated 31 March 2014. His wife Smt. Tessy Thomas is Director, Advanced System Laboratory, Hyderabad (ASL) and permanently residing at Hyderabad since past several years.
Temporary duty total number of days of Sri Saroj Kumar Patel, Scientist G since his posting at DRDO HQ in New Delhi to Hyderabad upto 31 August 2014.
The local address of Sri Saroj Kumar Patel, Scientist G.
Whether Sri Saroj Kumar Patel, Scientist G is occupying Government accommodation/DRDO Guest House in New Delhi.(Yes/No)
If yes then provide the HRA details paid to him with effect from his posting at DRDO HQ till date.
Note : It is observed that it is common practice of DRDO officials specially who are posted in DRDO Hqrs using Government accommodations /guest houses for long durations and simultaneously claimed HRA. The Letter of Ex DOP, Dr Arun Kumar in this respect enclosed herewith.
The abuse/misuse of power for personal gain is corruption. The information sought in this RTI Application pertains to allegations of corruption and as such not exempted u/s 24(1) of the RTI Act as per CIC decisions.
विषय : डीआरडीओमें श्री अविनाश चन्दर, वैज्ञानिक सलाहकार द्वारा जागीरदारी
माननीय श्री प्रधानमंत्री जी यह एक बड़े खेद का विषय है कि इतने महत्वपूर्ण संगठन के शीर्ष अधिकारी श्री अविनाश चन्दर जी ने सारी नैतिकताओं को दर किनार करते हुए डीआरडीओ में अपनी जागीरदारी चला रखी है।
आपने दिल्ली में जो देख कर जनता को लालकिले से अपना अनुभव बताया कि सब विभागों में अपनी अपनी जागीरदारी चल रही है वह एक पूर्ण सत्य है।
श्री अविनाश चन्दर जी ने अभी कुछ समय पहले एक वैज्ञानिक ‘जी’ पद में बहुत ही मनमाने ढंग सब नियत मानको की अनदेखी कर रिटायर कमोडोर सरोज पटेल की नियुक्ति करी है।
श्री अविनाश चन्दर जी ने रिटायर कमोडोर सरोज पटेल की सिर्फ नियुक्ति ही नहीं करी बल्कि डीआरडीओ के 507 वरिष्ठ वैज्ञानिक ‘जी’ की वरिष्ठता को दरकिनार करते हुए श्री पटेल को नियुक्ति के चार दिनों में डायरेक्टर के पद में भी बैठा कर वैज्ञानिको का मनोबल गिरा दिया है।
पूरे देश ने कारगिल जंग के समय डीआरडीओ की असफलताओ को देखा था और सबको जनरल मालिक के शब्द याद है ” डीआरडीओ के वजह से सेना वेपन लोकेटर रडार नहीं प्राप्त हो पाया और जिसके कारण सेना को अपने इतने जवान खोने पड़े”
आपसे आशा है की निम्न प्रेषित उक्त नियुक्ति की धांधली के पूर्ण विवरण को सी वी सी को जाँच के लिए आदेश देंगे जिससे डीआरडीओ के समर्पित वैज्ञानिको का मनोबल बढ़ सके और वे देश की विकास में भागीदारी में अपना पूर्ण योगदान कर सके।
To 14th September 2014
Central Vigilance Commissioner,
Central Vigilance Commission,
Satarkta Bhawan, A- Block,
GPO Complex, INA,
New Delhi-110023
SUBJECT:RECRUITMENT SCAM –II IN DRDO
Recruitment of Sh Saroj Kumar Patel, Scientist ‘G’ and Appointment on post of Director, Directorate of Quality, Reliability &Safety (DQRS), DRDO HQ Complaint against Sh Avinash Chander, DG, DRDO, SA to RM, Secretary, DRD
Sir,
Nepotism, favoritism, corruption and manipulations with vested interest in higher recruitment by misusing powers by HOD are very common practices now days in Government system by different means.
Based on the practices stated above, the Recruitment Scam-I occurred in DRDO in which several top Scientists including some ex-DGR&D, ex-CCR&D, ex-Directors and their daughters & relatives were involved. Several complaints were made to CVC & Defence Minister regarding Recruitment Scam-I and consequently CVC advices disciplinary action against Dr. Arun Kumar, Ex-DOP under major penalty vide OM No. 010/DEF/039/184877 dated 23.08.2012.(Copy enclosed-I).
Dr. Arun Kumar was suspended on the last day of his superannuation. Similarly some other Scientist Dr. S M Veerbhadrapa, Ex-Director, DTRL then HRD Charge Sheeted and Smt Chandra bano, Scientist ‘F’, DHRD was dismissed from service just 12 days before retirement. Since top ten officials of DRDO involved in Recruitment Scam-I were retired therefore on advice of Director (Vigilance) & CVO, Min. of Defence , then Defence Minister recommended CBI probe in Recruitment Scam-I of DRDO vide Dte (Vigilance), MOD note no.48-55 ante observations of JS & CVO at note 56 ante in November 2013. The news was published in media. Copy enclosed (II).
Shri Avinash Chander then CCR&D(MSS) also played an important role in Recruitment Scam-I while being member of expert committee under Chairmanship of Prof. SK Salwan, he gave clean chit to his friend Dr. Arun Kumar , ex-DOP vide his report dated 08.06.2011.
This case is regarding illegal recruitment with motivated planned conspiracy of Shri Avinash Chander, DG, DRDO and SA to RM, Dr. A.K. Singh, DOP and Smt. Hina Gokhle, Director, DHRD and Dr. RK Jain, Director, RAC and Dr. DN Reddy, Chairman, RAC.
BRIEF FACTS OF THE COMPLAINT
Shri Avinash Chander, DS was Director, ASL, Hyderabad from August 2005 to May 2011. He was appointed as CCR&D (MSS) in DRDO HQ and was holding position of no. 2 after Dr. V.K. Saraswat, then DGR&D and SA to RM. Shri Avinash Chander took over as DGR&D, DRDO and SA to RM wef 31 May 2013 after superannuation of Dr. V.K. Saraswat.
Smt. Tessy Thomas was working in ASL since its foundation and she was subordinate to Shri Avinash Chander when he was Director, ASL, Hyderabad. Smt Tessy Thomas was promoted to Scientist ‘H’/Outstanding Scientist wef 18 October 2013. She was appointed as Director, ASL, Hyderabad wef 25 July 2014.
As a matter of facts, the competent authority in DRDO for appointment of Directors of Lab/Estt and Directorates at DRDO HQ is Shri Avinash Chander DGR&D, DRDO and SA to RM.
Shri Saroj Kumar Patel, husband of Smt Tessy Thomas, OS (now Director, ASL) was serving in Indian Navy as Commodore and retired from Indian Navy on 31 January 2013. To oblige Smt Tessy Thomas, Shri Avinash Chander, then CCR&D(MSS) misused his position and succeeded in creation of a vacancy of Scientist ‘G’ in DRDO HQ and applications for this vacancy of Scientist ‘G’ were sought vide RAC Advt No. 110/December 2012. (Copy enclosed-III)
The Scientist ‘G’ in DRDO is having pay scale of Rs. 37,400-67,000/- & Grade Pay 10,000/-, which is equivalent to rank of Joint Secretary in Indian Administrative Services. Joint Secretary to the Government of India has pay scale in Pay Band – 4:Rs. 37400- 67000; and Grade Pay Rs. 10000.All promotions and appointments to this Joint Secretary rank and post are directly made by the Appointments Committee of the Cabinet (ACC).
The requirement of said vacancy of Scientist ‘G’ was tailor made for Shri Saroj Kumar Patel as evident from details of Advt. No. 110/December 2012.
SN
Criteria
RAC Advt. No. 110/Dec 2012
Bio-data of Shri SK Patel
Lab./Estt.
DRDO
Already posted at DRDO HQ
Subject/Discipline
Mechanical Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Qualification
Essential
Desirable
At least first class Bachelor’s Degree in Mechanical Engineering from a recognized University or equivalent.
B.Sc. (Mechanical Engg.)
ME/M Tech Degree in relevant subject.
M.Tech
Experience / Specialisation
Experience in the field of Quality, Reliability and Safety management of weapons and Armament Systems with involvementduring development/production/induction and life cycle management. Knowledge of guided weapons is also desirable.
Not Available
This malpractice for recruitment of Shri Saroj Kumar Patel was exposed by some senior Scientist ‘G’ of DRDO by writing complaint to Hon’ble Defence Minister in 2013 and therefore the plan of Shri Avinash Chander failed due to seriously consideration of the matter by Dr. V.K. Saraswat, then DGR&D, DRDO and SA to RM.
Shri Avinash Chander took over as DGR&D, DRDO and SA to RM on 31 May 2013 after superannuation of Dr. V.K. Saraswat. After acquiring full administrative & financial powers in DRDO, Shri Avinash Chander planned the recruitment of Shri Saroj Kumar Patel as Scientist ‘G’ in DRDO and therefore he planned a conspiracy of the illegal & motivated recruitment with help of his subordinates Dr. A.K. Singh, DOP, Smt. Hina Gokhle, Director, DHRD and Dr. DN Reddy, Chairman, RAC and Shri RK Jain, Director, RAC.
Accordingly phase-II of the said conspiracy started by issue of Letter No. DOP/11/110059/QRSM/M/02 dated 14 August 2013 of Directorate of Personnel, DRDO, MOD, New Delhi on the Subject- Appointment of Director, QRS, DRDO HQ, New Delhi. Copy of the letter dated 14 August 2013 along with Proforma for Director, QRS, DRDO HQ, New Delhi is enclosed-IV.
It was clearly mentioned in Para(1) of the letter that “Applications for the post of Director, Quality, Reliability & Safety(QRS) at DRDO HQrs, New Delhi are invited from SC ‘G’ promoted in the year 2013 having sufficient experience in the field of quality, reliability and safety. The Para 1 of letter is arbitrary, discriminatory, unethical and illegal in nature.
No essential qualification, desirable qualification and years of experience were sought and mentioned in said DOP letter for the post of Director, QRS.
Question arises why applications were invited only from the Scientist ‘G’ that were promoted in the year 2013 while in the seniority list of Scientist ‘G’ of DRDO as on 1st November 2013 there were 507 Scientist ‘G’ in total and out of which 114 were promoted in the year 2013 with effect from 01 July 2013? Copy of the seniority list of Scientist ‘G’ is enclosed-V. Why senior Scientist ‘G’ were not eligible for the post of the Director, QRS and under which rule DOP & DHRD decided that only junior most Scientist ‘G’ are eligible for the said post, while in appointments seniority plays an important role and senior most officers always given priority.
Mere reading of the letter dated 14 August 2013 issued from DOP establishes the conspiracy in recruitment. The letter was issued on 14 August 2013 and it was clearly mentioned in para (2) of the letter, reproduced as it is for ready reference “2. The applications should be duly forwarded/recommended by their respective Directors the enclosed profoma (Annexure-I) and must reach this office latest by 21st August 2013”. Hence only 6 days were provided to all Scientist ‘G’ of 52 Lab/Estt situated allover India right from Leh to Kochi and Vizag to Tezpur. The Para-2 is the clear violation of DOPT norms because period should be minimum 15 days.
As a matter of fact 15 August was National holiday, 16th was Friday, 17-18 August (week end holiday), 19-21 August (three working days). Now three questions arises
(i) Why only 04 working days was provided to submit the applications for post of Director, QRS?
(ii) What was the urgency to keep very short time for submitting applications?
(iii) Whether it was possible in any circumstances that ink signed copy of the application duly recommended by respective Director be reach with in two-three days by speed post to New Delhi far from various Lab/Estt. Of DRDO.
Answer to the questions raised in point(14) above is that applications were sought within DRDO simply to make formality and have a record that no Scientist ‘G’ applied for the said post or found eligible for the said post. It is matter of investigation by CVC from records that how many applications were received for post of Director, QRS, whether any list were prepared, whether any interview/interaction were organized, whether any committee scrutinized the proforma of Scientist ‘G’ and whether any Scientist ‘G’ was found suitable for the post of Director, QRS, DRDO Hqrs.
In fact said post were preplanned for Shri Saroj Kumar Patel since the December 2012 therefore any Scientist ‘G’ out of 507 Scientist ‘G’ of DRDO was not selected for the post of Director, QRS, DRDO Hqrs and post remain vacant.
Further to accommodate Shri Saroj Kumar Patel in DRDO an advertisement for post of Scientist ‘G’ were again issued by RAC, DRDO vide Advt. No. 112/October 2013 under direct recruitment scheme of DRDO under direction & guidance of Shri Avinash Chander with vested interest. Copy of the Advt No. 112/October 2013 is enclosed-VI.
Shri Saroj Kumar Patel was recruited as Scientist ‘G’ in DRDO against the 01 vacancy of Scientist ‘G’ vide RAC Advt No. 112/October 2013 and joined DRDO at DRDO HQrs, DRDO Bhawan, New Delhi with effect from 27 March 2014 at seniority no. 486 among Scientist ‘G’ of DRDO.
As a matter of fact Shri Saroj Kumar Patel joined DRDO as Scientist ‘G’ on 27 March 2014(Thursday) and appointed as Director, QRS, DRDO HQrs on 31 March 2014(Monday) so he worked only two days 27-28 March 2014 and jumped to post of Director only in service of 04 days. Shri Avinash Chander appointed Shri Patel as Director; QRS ignoring the 485 senior Scientist ‘G’ already available in DRDO and it establish favoritism & nepotism. It can only happened in DRDO.
Now again four question arises
i. Why Shri Patel was appointed as Director, QRS while he was recruited against vacancy of Scientist ‘G’ not for the post of Director, QRS by ignoring 485 senior Scientist ‘G’ in DRDO?
ii. What is the specialization of Shri Patel which is not available with 507 Scientist ‘G’ of DRDO, can the conspirators able to justify?
iii. Why so much favoritism was given to Shri Patel for his recruitment as Scientist ‘G’ and appointment as Director, QRS since October 2012 to March 2014 by Shri Avinash Chander?
iv. What special benefit DRDO get from Sh Patel’s tailor made appointment?
Keeping in view of the facts mentioned above and the subordination of Smt Tessy Thomas with Shri Avinash Chander right from several years in ASL, Hyderabad, it is crystal clear gross violation of recruitment rules, ethics and procedures took place and the same were not followed in recruitment of Shri Patel as Scientist ‘G’ on 27 March 2014 and further his appointment as Director, QRS on 31 March 2014. This smacks planned conspiracy and criminal misconduct by Shri Avinash Chander, DGR&D, DRDO, Dr. A.K. Singh, Director of Personnel, DRDO Hqrs, Smt Hina Gokhle, Director, DHRD, Dr. RK Jain, Director, RAC and Dr. DN Reddy, Chairman, RAC.
Therefore, it is kindly requested that appointment of Shri Saroj Kumar Patel, Scientist ‘G’ should be cancelled with immediate effect and inquiry be conducted under Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 and CCS (CCA) Rules 1965 against the senior officers of DRDO involved in planned conspiracy of recruitment and appointment of Shri Saroj Kumar Patel as Scientist ‘G’ in DRDO and appointment as Director, QRS, DRDO HQrs.
माननीयश्री नरेंद्र मोदी जी दिनाक 12 जून 2014प्रधानमंत्रीकक्षसंख्या152पीएमओसाउथ ब्लाक नईदिल्ली -110011
विषय : डीआरडीओ में ताजमहलो का निर्माण
माननीय श्री प्रधानमंत्री जी डीआरडीओ में रक्षा प्रणालीयो के अनसुन्धान व् निर्माण के नाम पर जो लूट मची है उस के कई उदाहरण समय समय पर अखबारों के माध्यम से आम जनो को पता चलता रहता है परन्तु वास्तविकता यह है कि इन सभी खबरों को राष्ट्रीय सुरक्षा के नाम पर दबा दिया जाता है
ब्रह्मोस कम्पनी की उत्पति सन 1998 से आज तक उप्लभ्धि पर नजर डाले तो हज़ारों करोड़ रूपए खर्चेने के बाद भी सिवाए टेस्ट फायर के खबरों कुछ भी यथार्थ में नहीं मिलेगा असली उप्लभ्धि है श्री पिल्लई का सन 2007 से अब तक सात बरसों का सर्विस में एक्सटेंशन, लाखो रूपए खर्च करके अपना होलोग्राम बनवाया, अपनी नाम की गैलेरी बनवायी, अपनी आत्म कथा लिखने पर जनता का पैसा खर्च करा, लाखो रूपए के ब्रह्मोस मिसाइल के लकड़ी के माडल बनवाए, लाखो रूपए विदेशो में डिफेन्स एक्सपो के नाम पर विदशो में खर्च किये एक पैसे का आज तक आर्डर नहीं मिला, क्या हमारे देश में सेल्फ मोरल नाम की चीज़ वास्तव में खो गयी है, अब जाकर जब श्री पिल्लई के दोस्त की सरकार गयी तो ब्रह्मोस कम्पनी को नया सी ई औ मिल रहा है, पर क्या पंद्रह सालो में जो श्री पिल्लई ने देश का पैसा बर्बाद किया उसका हिसाब हमारे प्रधान मंत्री जी श्री पिल्लई से मांगेगे I
डीआरडीओ सन 1990 से मिसाइल के नाम पर हज़ारों करोड़ रूपए खर्च कर रहा है देश को जानकर यह आश्चर्य होगा कि डीआरडीओ के वैज्ञानिको ने मिसाइल को एक होली काऊ बना कर जम कर दोह रहे हैं अगर मात्र डी आर डी एल हैदराबाद संस्था का स्पेशल ऑडिट करा लिया जाय तो पुरे डीआरडीओ के स्वास्थ्य का पता देश को चल जायेगा I
उदाहरण के लिए – एक लगभग 8 मीटर x 12 मीटर का गोदाम डी आर डी एल हैदराबाद ने 19 जून 2014 को बड़े साज सज्जा के साथ उद्घाटन किया ( गोदाम की फोटो सलग्न है ) कुल लागत लगभग आठ करोड़
गोदाम की लागत – दो करोड़ पिचासी लाख
गोदाम के अंदर लोहे की रैक – दो करोड़ पचास लाख
गोदाम के अंदर संचालन हेतु दो बैटरी ऑपरेटेड फोर्क लिफ्ट व् प्लेटफार्म ट्रक – नब्बे लाख व् एक करोड़ बीस लाख
गोदाम के अंदर रखे सामान के जानकारी हेतु बारकोड सॉफ्टवेयर – सतर लाख
गोदाम का एयर कंडीशनर आदि – एक करोड़ से अधिक
गोदाम के अंदर फायर फाइटिंग का कोई प्रावधान नहीं दिया है I
जिस कांट्रेक्टर से गोदाम का निर्माण करवाया उसने आर्डर से दो महीने पूर्व ही कार्य आरम्भ कर दिया था I (गोदाम का निर्माण के कार्य सम्बन्ध की सम्पूर्ण सूचनाये सलग्न है)
आप से आग्रह है कि अगर आप गुजरात के किसी व्यापारी बंधू से गोदाम की लागत निकलवाएंगे तो सिर्फ एक करोड़ रूपये की लागत आएगी और हो सकता है उससे भी कम आए I
अतः आपसे अनुरोध है कि डीआरडीओ के वैज्ञानिको को रक्षा प्रणालीयो के अनसुन्धान के नाम पर देश को लूटने से बचाये I
धन्यवाद
प्रभु डंडरियाल
21-सुंदरवाला, रायपुर, देहरादून
फ़ोन 0135- 2787750, मोबाइल – 9411114879,
e-मेल id prabhudoon@gmail.com वेबसाइट www.corruptionindrdo.com
Item Description – Design, Manufacturing, Supply, Erection and Commissioning of Detachable Integrated Logistics Store EnclosureDemand No. (DRDL/LRS/26/98P/13/049) Demand Date (dd.mm.yy)- 31.12.13
Inventory Holder Name (S/Shri.) V. Venkateswarlu , Scientist – D , LRSAM Project ,DRDL phone no : 040 2458 4507
To, 17th April 2014
Shri Pritam Dutta, IDAS,
ACDA, CPIO,CVO,
O/o PCDA (R&D), West Block-V,
R K PURAM,
NEW DELHI- 110066
Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of LRSAM Project, DRDL’s demand of Design, Manufacturing, Supply, Erection and Commissioning of Detachable Integrated Logistics Store Enclosure vide Demand No. DRDL/LRS/26/98P/13/049 Demand Dated 31/12/13. It is observed that M/s Trinetra Constructions already started construction on the site against above demand well before (almost two months) supply order is not given to firm. The firm already erected the structure and work in progress the store was constructed and wall plaster is in progress.
The demand was raised vide Demand No. (DRDL/LRS/26/98P/13/049) dated 31.12.13 by sh V. Venkateswarlu , Scientist – D, LRSAM Project, DRDL SO Value with TAX (Rs.) 29925000.00 Firm Name M/s Trinetra Constructions Address 17-1-388/77/B, Lakshmi Nagar Colony, Saidabad , HYDERABAD The firm submitted the Bank Guarantee of Rs 2850000 vide Andhra Bank Guarantee No.35214IGPER0004 dated 13.03.14 As per the bank guarantee dates and enclosed photo of constructions anyone can understood the work was started very early before the date of bank i.e 13.03.14. Your rep Sh Ved Veer Arya , IDAS, finance officer , missile complex ( DRDL,ASL, was participated in the processing of the case. The matter is directory related with corruption and it seems that PCDA rep closed his eyes because the rate of construction of required store Enclosure is five time higher.
Names and address of firms who were invited for said demand as the case was dealt in limited tender mode
The copies of quotations received from firms against said demand
Copy of authority letter (other than supply order) given to M/s Trinetra Constructions enters and starts the construction the restricted area by competent LRSAM officials.
Date of starting construction by M/s Trinetra Constructions against above said demand.
Certified copies of last three years (April 2010 to March 2013) orders given by DRDL to M/s Trinetra Constructions.
Provide the number of supply orders placed to M/s Trinetra Constructions in April 2011 to March 2014 processed by CDA, Hyderabad.
Note : Matter is directly related to corruption and not exempted under Section 24 (1) as a proof the photos of above said Detachable Integrated Logistics Store Enclosure are enclosed.
Please follow the provision of section 6(3) of the Act.
To 11th February 2014
Sh A K Antony
Defence Minister
Room No – 104, South Block
New Delhi -110011
Subject: Justice Denied to a Patriot and Honest Officer by DRDO
Honorable Sir,
In last fifteen years many honest officers / employees who raised their voice against corrupt practices being followed by DRDO senior officials were penalized.
Sh G Jupiter of ASL, DRDO, Hyderabad a patriot and honest officer who helped Intelligence Bureau (IB) in national interest and in bringing out spying activity by senior scientist and officer of DRDO is being harassed by not giving him his due credits even after the honorable CAT decision in his favor.
Honorable Defence Minister is requested to look personally in this matter and do needful in national interest.
