Tag Archives: Corruption

Bharat Dynamics Limited(BDL) Tender Controversy: A ₹56.8-Crore Question of Accountability, Defence Ethics and National Trust

Defence PSU gives tender for anti-tank missile part to commodore ex-chief’s family firm

Bharat Dynamics Limited’s single-tender procurement of anti-tank missile optical sights has raised serious questions about procurement integrity, potential conflicts of interest, and the standards of accountability expected from those entrusted with India’s defence institutions.

The ₹56.8-Crore Tender Scam That Demands Answers

Bharat Dynamics Limited (BDL), a major public-sector defence enterprise under the Ministry of Defence, is at the centre of a procurement controversy following its decision to issue a single tender for 300 optical sights used in anti-tank guided missile systems to Aindri Defence Advisory Private Limited Hydrabad.

According to an investigation published by The Indian Express, the company quoted ₹56.8 crore for the procurement, and its bid had cleared the technical evaluation stage, while financial evaluation was reportedly underway at the time of publication.

The controversy is not simply about a procurement worth crores of rupees. It concerns the circumstances under which a non-competitive procurement route was adopted, the relationship between the selected company and BDL’s EX-CMD Commodore Sidharth Mishra, and the adequacy of safeguards designed to protect public resources from potential conflicts of interest.

A Former Navy Commodore and the Burden of Public Trust

One of the most consequential aspects of this case is the professional background of Commodore Siddharth Mishra, BDL’s former Chairman and Managing Director.

Mishra served in the Indian Navy’s electrical branch for more than three decades, retiring in 2016 as a Commodore. He subsequently served at Electronics Corporation of India Limited(ECIL) before becoming BDL’s Chairman and Managing Director in 2019. His tenure at BDL ended in March 2023.

In May 2024, Mishra and his wife, Shambhavi Mishra, incorporated Aindri Defence Advisory Private Limited, initially holding equal shares. According to company records cited in the investigation, Mishra ceased to be a director and shareholder in January 2025, when he was appointed Member (Technical) at the National Company Law Tribunal(NCLT) in Kolkata. His wife subsequently held a 95 percent stake in the company while the remaining 5% was held by Kaushiki Nandan Vatsyayana, identified as Siddharth Mishra’s elder brother.”

Currently as per NCLT he is not associated at present.

However, the subsequent award of a single tender to a company founded by a former head of the procuring defence PSU raises legitimate questions that deserve rigorous, independent scrutiny.

Military service is a position of honour, but honour must be reflected in conduct, accountability and the decisions made after retirement.

The Single-Tender Route: Where Is the Full Explanation?

A single tender is a non-competitive procurement mechanism under which only one vendor is invited to bid. Such a route can be permissible under specified circumstances, including genuine urgency or the existence of a sole capable supplier.

According to the investigation, BDL justified its decision by citing urgency. The tender documentation reportedly included certification that the demand was urgent and that the additional expenditure associated with not using an advertised tender was justified. It also stated that the nature of the urgency and the reasons the requirement could not have been anticipated had been placed on record.

That gap is central to the controversy.

Why was a competitive procurement process not adopted? What specific operational requirement made the single-tender route necessary? Were alternative qualified suppliers assessed? What safeguards were applied to eliminate actual or perceived conflicts of interest? Was the urgency independently reviewed and adequately documented?

A Significant Departure from Previous Procurement Practice

The reported procurement history adds another dimension to the matter.

According to comparable purchases of optical sights in 2024 and 2025 followed competitive processes restricted to public-sector enterprises. India Optel Limited(IOL), a defence public-sector undertaking, won both tenders.

The 2026 procurement, by contrast, was directed exclusively to Aindri Defence Advisory through a single-tender process, potentially allowing a private company to secure an order of this scale for the first time in the three-year period examined by the investigation.

The public interest demands an explanation of the technical, operational and commercial rationale behind this decision.

Questions About Infrastructure and Commercial Capacity

The investigation also reported findings from a physical verification of Aindri Defence Advisory’s listed premises in Hyderabad.

the company’s office at the National Small Industries Corporation campus in Kushaiguda was found locked during the newspaper’s visit. An employee of another organisation reportedly said that people opened the office only occasionally. The investigation also reported that the residential address previously associated with the company was vacant at the time of the visit.

Company records cited in the report showed that Aindri’s 2024–25 revenue was ₹44.43 lakh, with a profit of ₹2.89 lakh. Its balance sheet listed no property, manufacturing plant or other assets.

These findings warrant careful interpretation. A consultancy company may operate without owning a manufacturing plant, and the absence of visible assets does not establish that a business lacks the capacity to deliver a specialised product.

The reported tender concerns 300 optical sights, with sample-validation requirements and technical support for maintenance, repair and overhaul for at least 15 years. Such obligations raise practical questions about manufacturing arrangements, access to qualified technical personnel, quality assurance, long-term servicing capability, supply-chain resilience and accountability for product failures.

The competent authorities should establish whether the selected supplier possesses the necessary capabilities directly or through properly evaluated manufacturing and technical partners.

The controversy warrants clear answers to several questions:

  1. Justification for urgency: What specific circumstances necessitated a single tender, and why could the requirement not be met through an advertised competitive process?
  2. Conflict-of-interest safeguards: What declarations, disclosures and independent reviews were undertaken to assess potential or perceived conflicts arising from the former BDL chief’s association with the selected company?
  3. Supplier capability: What due diligence established the supplier’s ability to meet the technical, manufacturing, quality-assurance and long-term support requirements of the contract?
  4. Commercial reasonableness: How was the quoted amount of ₹56.8 crore assessed against technical specifications, comparable procurements, cost benchmarks and value-for-money requirements?
  5. Procurement oversight: Were the applicable procurement rules followed in full, and is the decision supported by a complete, auditable record?
  6. Public accountability: Will BDL and the Ministry of Defence provide an appropriate explanation of the procurement decision without compromising legitimate operational confidentiality?

These questions should be addressed through established oversight mechanisms and evidence-based examination, not speculation or political rhetoric.

The BDL–Aindri tender controversy presents a serious test of institutional transparency and public accountability. A ₹56.8-crore bid, a non-competitive procurement route, the corporate links to a former BDL chief and reported questions concerning the supplier’s visible infrastructure together create circumstances that merit close scrutiny.

India’s defence ecosystem is built on the sacrifices of its soldiers, the expertise of its engineers, the work of its scientists and the trust of its citizens. That trust cannot be taken for granted. It must be earned through transparent decisions, rigorous technical evaluation and unwavering adherence to ethical standards.

For a country investing heavily in indigenous defence manufacturing, the credibility of its procurement institutions is itself a strategic asset. Public-sector defence enterprises must demonstrate that their decisions serve national capability, and the responsible use of taxpayers’ money.

Source and attribution: This article is based on reporting by The Indian Express concerning Bharat Dynamics Limited, Aindri Defence Advisory Private Limited and the optical-sight procurement. The allegations and questions discussed above should be assessed against official tender documents, company filings and responses from the concerned authorities. The views expressed in the analysis are intended to promote transparency, ethical governance and accountability in defence procurement.

JAI HIND!

Request to PM For Legal Assistance to Fight Against Corrupt Practices Prevailing in BEL

To                                                                                             26th July 2019

Hon’ble Shri Narendra Modi Ji, Prime Minister of India,

Room No -152, PMO, South Block, New Delhi-110011

Respected Narendra Modi Ji,

My humble question is this if any citizen starts exposing the corrupt practices prevailing in government, public sector etc and these organizations using public funds to protect themselves for exposing from citizen (Chowkidar) of India. Then what is the mechanism do you have to protect these volunteer citizens (Chowkidars) of India.

I want to give you an example that since 20 years continue fighting with these corrupt gangs of government servants who for their little greed compromise with national security, and facing lot of time bogus FIRs and other short of pressures and to save my life I have spend lot of money in traveling, hiring lawyers etc.

Currently you may aware that an Rs 7900 Cr IACCS Project of Air Force which is implementing by BEL is exposed due to irregularities in awarding tenders and so many different allegations by media with authentic documentary evidence. First Post, DNA etc

BEL CVO investigated the ongoing 10 underground command centers IACCS Project of Air Force and found lot of irregularities but entire top BEL management trying to buried the issue and unforeseen reasons the recommendations (29th March 2019) of BEL, CVO not processed till date. It seems that corrupt involved top BEL officers trying to manage Ministry of Defence Production, because the available documentary evidences are more than enough to prove the prevailing corrupt practices of BEL officials.

I have also supported the cause because my sole aim is to remove the corruption in defence sector because I believe that corruption in defence is directly impact in national security. For publishing the corrupt practices of BEL management in my website corruptionindrdo.com received a legal notice through law firm Chouta Associates, Bangalore by using poor tax payer’s money.

I request you to kindly provide me a legal assistance officially from PMO as I am now senior citizen and supporting your mission “Mai Bhi Chowkidar”

Your early action is require to fill oxygen in mission “Mai Bhi Chowkidar”

“It is unfortunate that corruption was institutionalized. The time has come to change this. The time for middlemen is over: PM 5:58 PM – 17 Aug 2017

PMO India September 6, 2016 ·

Zero tolerance towards corruption & black money…an issue PM Narendra Modi has been speaking on at the world stage.

PM Modi Urges Supporters to Take ‘Main Bhi Chowkidar’ Pledge Modi has often described himself as a “chowkidar” who would neither allow corruption nor let himself be corrupted.

Everyone who is fighting corruption, dirt, social evils is a Chowkidar

Jai Bharat, Vande Matram

Regards

Prabhu Dandriyal, 21-Sunderwala, Raipur,Dehradun-248008, 0135-2787750 9411114879 –prabhudoon@gmail.com | website – www.corruptionindrdo.com

Enclosed – Legal Notice received by Law Firm Chouta Associate on behalf of BEL

PMOPG/E/2019/0418698 

Vigilance heat forced BEL to drastically cut tender size for software in IAF’s Rs 7,900-cr IACCS project, but contract went to tainted US firm

Yatish Yadav Jul 11, 2019 12:31:00 IST First Post
New Delhi: After Firstpost expose on glaring irregularities in the civil construction of Indian Air Force’s (IAF) highly sensitive Integrated Air Command and Control System (IACCS) project, a former manager of a defence public sector undertaking and a whistleblower has surfaced alleging corruption in the procurement of software for automated command and control system for air defence operations.

Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL), a defence public sector undertaking is implementing the Rs 7, 900 crore project, which was initiated during the UPA regime.

The former manager of BEL, Bhupesh Sharma in a letter to the Ministry of Defence and the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) on 29 June 2019 has said that top management of the defence public sector undertaking, quietly buried the findings of a 2016 internal inquiry, which indicted six BEL officers for alleged corruption. Sharma alleged that despite a reminder from the Chief Vigilance Officer (CVO) of the company to the Chairman and Managing Director (CMD) of BEL in April 2018, no punitive action was taken against the accused officers.

Representational image of an air defence system. Reuters

Sharma, then part of the procurement committee, had blown the whistle over alleged manipulation in the procurement of Data Distribution Service (DDS) software to favour an American company. Sharma alleging victimisation said accused officers indicted by vigilance were rewarded by BEL while he was harassed for exposing deep-rooted corruption.
“Even after CVC intervention and reminders by CVO to CMD (Chairman and Managing Director) no action was taken against the erring officers. I was harassed and troubled to the extent that I was forced to resign. Instead of black listing the vendor M/S RTI USA, the order was finally placed on the vendor. The vigilance officer who did the enquiry in this case has also been given punishment posting to a remote unit of BEL. The message given by the top management was clear that anyone who speaks against corruption would be brutally suppressed and those who play along with the persons at the top having vested interests would be rewarded,” Sharma, who claims to have been decorated with innovation award, excellence awards and Raksha Mantri award for IACCS project , wrote to the CVC.

The documents also reveal that efforts were made by BEL officers to conceal the alleged irregularities by removing the files and purchase order. Even the investigators were denied full access to e-mails of concerned purchase department.

A detailed questionnaire sent to the Chief Vigilance Commissioner Sharad Kumar, Ministry of Defence and BEL CMD MV Gowtama remained unanswered.

Unravelling of software scam

Firstpost has reviewed the documents submitted to the Ministry of Defence and the CVC, which clearly shows that the procurement committee had engineered unwarranted specification in the procurement of DDS software to allegedly disqualify one of the two vendors in the race for the contract.

The two companies, M/S RTI, USA and M/S Prismtech, UK represented by M/S Mistral Solutions and M/S RTTS respectively were invited by the BEL for the procurement of DDS software. The vigilance report said procurement team had pre-decided to give the contract to M/S RTI USA and the entire process of real time demonstration to assess feasibility also known as Proof of Concept (PoC) was merely an eyewash.

Although UK Company had quoted value of the project in the range of about Rs 5 to 10 crore, the quote submitted by American company M/S RTI was about Rs 130 crore. However, since, the BEL had decided to grant the project to M/S RTI, USA through its Indian representative M/S Mistral Solutions, BEL officers inserted a particular specification which caught the eye of vigilance team investigating the case.

“Technical expert in his report has stated that there is a lack of clarity in the PoC evaluation process/criteria which leads to ambiguity and conspiracy. Also technical expert has confirmed that there are irregularities and inconsistencies in framing of specifications and conducting PoC. Scope of PoC for the DDS document does not specify any particular method of demonstrating the PoC and it generally highlights the features to be shown in the PoC. Hence the vendor can select any particular method and demonstrate the features. PoC evaluation criteria and the PoC test document is not uniform for all the vendors,” the vigilance report to the CVC said.

System Requirements Specification document signed with the customer by BEL indicates that there are no special specification requirements for the use and configuration of DDS and also the security of the data transferred using DDS. PoC scope does not highlight that the above security implementations should match and confirm to DDS OMG standards. Even though no vendor has a complete implementation of DDS X types still M/S RTI was shown complied during technical bidding regarding para 6.2 of technical specification,” the report further said.

The vigilance report made it clear that specifications mentioned above as ‘para 6.2 technical specs’ were allegedly modified by the procurement committee of BEL to suit American firm. Sharma claims he had opposed such manipulation and turned whistleblower by exposing the wrongdoings in his emails to vigilance and top officials of the BEL.

“I became the whistleblower when ordering of software for the IACCS project was forcibly being ordered on the resultant single tender basis (by manipulating and making the other vendor technically non-complied). I tried my best to stop the ordering by talking to all my seniors in the unit and finally when I was not heard, I wrote to CVO and all the directors of the company including CMD about the corrupt practices being followed in the unit,” Sharma wrote to the CVC.

It is also evident from the vigilance report that the UK firm was deliberately denied security clearance for demonstration though its India representative M/S RTTS was allowed and subsequently disqualified.

“The team (BEL) misinformed M/S Prismtech regarding non-availability of security clearance on 11 May 2016, though a security clearance was taken by Senior Manager DGM (Development & Engineering division of Network Centric System 1) for the period of 9 May-11 May 2016. The contradicting statements of senior executives and D&E engineers in relation to security clearance for M/S Prismtech representative’s leads to suspect that D&E does not want to give the opportunity to M/S Prismtech to demonstrate the features,” the vigilance report said.

Questions have also been raised by the vigilance team over the formation of a technical committee and PoC committee for the procurement. The report observed although the procurement involves a lot of technical parameters related to software and high value of approximately Rs 130 crore, the procurement committee was made with two mechanical engineers, one finance and two electronic engineers. The report slammed BEL further asserting that there were no software professionals in the technical specification team and approval of a procurement team with non-technical members reveals a lax approach of the management as they played a dubious role.

“It appears that D&E engineers (Development & Engineering division) have played a pivotal role in finalizing specifications whereas others merely acted as spectators,” the vigilance report said.

The report has also raised doubt on the assessment process of technical specifications saying that evaluation of features is not the same for both M/S Prismtech and M/S RTI.

It said the PoC which were done by engineers from M/S Mistral Solutions, representative of RTI, USA, did not have relevant past experience to carry out PoC of DDS software and they could not answer anything technically or relevantly. The vigilance team during an interrogation of engineers from Development & Engineering division found that some engineers who were nominated as PoC members were not aware that they were part of an evaluation team.

Some were absent during the assessment, some engineers had relegated the job to their junior executives and no detailed review was done during the conduct of PoC and no senior executives have monitored the progress of PoC though it was such an important activity for the project. The test report of the American firm was also prepared in advance.

“From the test data report of M/S Mistral (representative of M/S RTI USA, it emerges that test data report was pre-prepared by suppliers and merely signed by BEL engineers. During examination of D&E engineers, it is observed that D&E-NCS has started working on evaluation versions of M/S RTI, USA since October 2015 through license agreements. During evaluation many issues came time to time and were resolved. This was probably the reason that PoC with M/S RTI, USA was merely a formality. The PoC conducted by M/S Mistral Solutions has been cleared despite number of irregularities/ inconsistencies,” the vigilance report said exposing the manipulation to favour a particular vendor.

The documents reveal that before the investigators could examine the documents related to alleged corruption, the files were removed by the concerned officers to erase the audit trail.

The vigilance report said, “Documents with respect to change of specifications which is intimated to M/S RTTS (India representative of M/S Prismtech, UK) was not found in the file, not informed to the investigator at any point and the same was concealed by purchase department. There was no documentary proof regarding the intimation of changed specifications to four cases to all the suppliers participated in the bidding. Currently, the purchase requisitions are also deleted in SAP (System Applications and Products) without assigning reasons and Unit Management has not given any reasons till now for the same.”

The vigilance report which was forwarded to the CVC on 24 November 2016, clearly opined that there are procedural violations in the subject case and there appear to be malafide intentions right from the beginning of coming out of consolidated requirements, generating the specifications for this software instead of PP drawings, arriving of PoC conditions, the manner in which PoC was conducted and M/S RTI, USA bid was accepted and M/S Prismtech bid was eliminated.

The vigilance recommended blacklisting of M/S RTI, USA, initiation of disciplinary action against officers involved and including the name of two senior officers in doubtful integrity list.

In defence procurements, the private companies are known to be hiring retired officials to exercise the influence. In this case too, vigilance raised apprehension about alleged manipulation as a former CMD of BEL was on board of Mistral Solutions. The vigilance had recommended a probe by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), however, the matter was never referred to the premier investigative agency.

“It is learnt that M/S RTI’s malafide intention/ involvement with BEL D&E team cannot be underestimated as ex-CMD (BEL) Mr. Ashwini Kumar Datta is working in M/S Mistral Solutions which requires further investigation by the CBI,” the vigilance report said.

In its recommendation, the vigilance also said the finalisation of specifications and scope of PoC should be done by a competent technical committee and any vested interest/doubtful integrity executives should not be part of the panel.

Cover-up by BEL?

The alleged cover-up in the entire irregularities started after the project came under the scanner. The Rs 130 crore tender was scrapped and suddenly BEL realised that they have in house capability to provide that suspected security specifications that was inserted to allegedly favour a particular company.

However, Sharma said, the BEL management did not take any disciplinary action against accused officers, did not include two senior officers in doubtful integrity list and did not blacklist the American firm. In fact, Sharma alleged, a bogus re-tendering process was initiated on the single-vendor basis and this time the DDS software contract without suspected specification was awarded to same firm Mistral Solutions, India representative of RTI, USA at less than Rs 10 crore. The BEL GM, NCS Joydeep Majumdar in a letter to the CVO confirmed the contract to Mistral Solutions while claiming they have saved more than Rs 110 crore.

“Earlier security features were included in the RFQ for DDS software. M/S Mistral Solutions qualified technically. Mistral quoted Rs. 120 Crores, however, the technical committee after study found out that the security solution was available with CRL Bangalore (Central Research Laboratory) and no need to buy from Mistral. A proof of concept was carried out and it was found working with the proposed DDS. Thus, the committee decided to go for the same DDS from Mistral which was purchased earlier for CMS in NCS, SBU which was without security features and hence was valued very low. Also, since the NCS engineers are conversant with this DDS it will obviate learning the new DDS, if chosen otherwise. A fresh Single Tender Enquiry was floated and the expected order price is less than Rs.10 Crore,” GM Majumdar wrote to the CVO on 9 February 2017.

This new found solution to douse the scandal was clearly an afterthought, reveals the documents sent to defence ministry and the CVC. The vigilance report clearly stated that Request For Proposal (RFP) even before the procurement process began, was finalised in coordination with the CRL. Nowhere, documents mentioned CRL team’s observation that they have in-house capability of security solution and therefore there was no need to purchase it from a private vendor at such a high price.

Even after RFP, the two members of CRL were part of the evaluation process and nowhere during the assessment process, the members acknowledged having in-house capability for the security solution that could save taxpayers money. In fact, further investigation revealed that UK’s company India representative M/S RTTS had held meeting at CRL Bangalore but the issue of having this in house security specification capability was not raised.

“A meeting with the vendor M/S RTTS at CRL Bangalore was conducted and the vendor has informed during discussion that PoC had ambiguous requirements not in line with PoC document, hostile environment during conduct of PoC by some of the PoC team members, required infrastructure which has to be provided by BEL was not provided,” the investigation report said.

Sharma claimed, the BEL officials brought up the issue of CRL having security solution only after procurement came under the vigilance scanner to conceal the alleged irregularities.

Subsequently, the CVC, not pleased with soft action of merely issuing warning letters to accused officers, wrote to BEL CMD MV Gowtama on 5 July 2017 for taking appropriate action.

“The Commission has observed that the tender was scrapped but the violations are serious in nature. The officers concerned have been let off with very lenient action. The Commission has desired that the CMD, Bharat Electronics Limited may review it sou-moto, if provision exists,” Ajay Kanoujia, Director, CVC wrote to Gowtama.

Later on 17 July 2017, Manager Vigilance in a note decided to send a reminder to the CMD observing that action against accused officers were indulgent.

“In the subject case, CVC’s observation were in line with Corporate Vigilance’s observations that a lenient view has been taken by the disciplinary authority without analyzing corporate vigilance letter/report, to close the case with minor penalty actions for the reasons not mentioned in the corporate vigilance report. In this regard, in line with CVC recommendations, it is proposed to send a letter to CMD to initiate appropriate major disciplinary proceeding action on attempts done by delinquent officers,” the note said.

Further, file noting suggests that another reminder for action in the case was sent to the CMD on 9 April 2018. It is also learnt that similar irregularities were unearthed in the procurement of database (DB) and Operating System which were later rectified after an internal probe flagged the wrongdoings.

Similarly, in civil construction, the issue of a single vendor for design consultant and procurement from the related parties have come under the vigilance scanner. Instead of taking action against the accused officers named in the vigilance report, the defence public sector undertaking has suspended members of the investigation team, who exposed the corruption.

“The same modus operandi has been followed with the vigilance team which brought out the corruption in selection of the design consultant and civil infrastructure ordering. The report of the vigilance enquiry has been downplayed and every member who was part of the vigilance enquiry has been charge sheeted, suspended or given punishment postings,” Sharma wrote to the CVC.

FCC BUSINESS IN DRDO: CORRUPTION IN R&D OF BPJ AT DMSRDE, KANPUR

To,                                                                                                                                  4th August 2017

Hon’ble Shri ArunJaitely

RakshaMantri, Bharat Sarkar

RakshaMantralaya,

South Block,

New Delhi-110011

Subject: FCC Business in DRDO- Corruption in DMSRDE, Kanpur by Dr. Rajesh Kumar Tiwari, Scientist ‘F’

Sir,

As you aware there are several questions raised by honorable members of Parliament regarding corrupt practice complaints against DRDO Directors and senior scientist but unfortunately DRDO “pull the wool over MoD eyes” in the name of constitution Fact Finding Committees for such complaints. The fact is the committees chairman and members are always their yes man/chamchas. The reports generated after consuming months and months and as per designed by DG and his loyal coterie. CVO, MoD only busy with correspondences for several years in each case.

Sir, you just call a sample case from CVO, MoD on your table, will expose the modus operendi of these great manipulator scientists of DRDO. Whether case of R&D E, Ex Director Dr Guruprasad, Ex Director DMSRDE, Dr A K Saxena, Dr A K Tyagi, Scietist ‘G’, Ex C C &D, Dr Selvamurty and so many case are pending in the desk of CVO, MoD waiting for fake reports of FFIC’s and clarifications of show cause notices replies of DRDO.

Corruption and adoption of corrupt practices in routine office activities is inherent property of DMSRDE, Kanpur. Even after dozens of complaints on corruption to CVC and its slow motion action on these complaints, Hon’ble High Court Delhi Order in PIL WP(C) No. 3610/2015 dated 17 Dec 2015 and Show Cause Notices to more than 30 Scientists and officers of DMSRDE, Kanpur and approval of Charge Sheet under Major Penalty to Ex- Director Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena there is no fear in some daring Scientists of DMSRDE and once again Corruption started in DMSRDE, Kanpur.

The recent case is of Complaint dated 21 October 2016 by Shri K.K. Sharmaagainst Dr. Rajesh Kumar Tiwari, Scientist ‘F’. As usual on receiving of complaint DRDO HQ constituted Fact Finding Committee (FCC) – Chairman Shri R.K. Sharma, Scientist ‘G’ , DPA, DRDO HQ.

The case relates to complaint dated 21 October 2016 sent by Shri K.K. Sharma, DMSRDE, Kanpur to Hon’ble RakshaMantri alleging corruption in procurement of material by using fake addresses of firms by Dr. R.K. Tiwari, Scientist ‘F’, DMSRDE, Kanpur in development of Bullet Proof Jacket (BPJ) GSQR 1318.

A File No. DVS/02/2039/P/22 was initiated in the matter and a revised report in accordance with Note No. 19 dated 09 March 2017 was seek by Director General (NS &M) and letter  was sent to Dr. N. Eswara Prasad, Director, DMSRDE on 21.03.2017 from Office of DG(NS&M).  He was asked to submit the revised report by 23 June 2017 vide DG(NS&M) letter No. DVS/02/2039/P/22 dated 19 June 2017.

As a matter of fact Dr. Rajesh Kumar Tiwari, Scientist ‘F’ was Head of Composite Material Division and Project Head of Body Armour : Bullet Proof Jacket (BPJ) -GSQR 1318. He was removed from Head, Composite Division  and Shri A.S. Parihar , Scientist ‘E’ was made Project Head & Head of Composite Division by Director, DMSRDE under huge pressure of DRDO HQ. It is relevant to mention here that Show Cause notice has been issued to Shri A. S. Parihar , Scientist ‘E’ in Corruption matter of Dr. A.K. Saxena complaints and his promotion was also withheld by DRDO HQ for several months.

Dr. Rajesh Kumar Tiwari, Scientist ‘F’ is still posted at DMSRDE, Kanpur and no action has been taken against him. He is having blessings of Dr. N. Eswara Prasad, Director, DMSRDE and enjoying at DMSRDE, Kanpur. DRDO HQ is trying to wash out the matter by its FCC business ( means submit fake FCC report and protect the corrupt) and adopting delay tactics in this complaint.

Sir, your Government is having policy of “zero tolerance” on corruption then why not any disciplinary action has been initiated since last 09 months of filing the complaint? I kindly request you to take urgent action in the matter and issue orders to immediate transfer/posting of  Dr. Rajesh Kumar Tiwari, Scientist ‘F’ out of DMSRDE as he is affecting the inquiry and influencing the case due to his contacts at DMSRDE. It is relevant to mention here that Dr. Rajesh Kumar Tiwari, Scientist ‘F’ is posted at DMSRDE since the year 1990.

 

Regards

Prabhu Dandriyal

21- Sunderwala, Raipur

Dehradun – 248008

Mobile -9411114879

Email id prabhudoon@gmail.com, ww.corruptionindrdo.com

Enclosures:

  1. Hon’ble High Court Delhi relevant portion of Order in PIL WP(C) No. 3610/2015 dated 17 Dec 2015.
  2. Vigilance Clarence to Dr. A.K. Saxena dated 31 July 2015
  3. Letter DVS/02/2039/P/22 dated 19 June 2017 from Office of Director General ( NS &M), DRDO Bhawan, New Delhi.
  4. Relevant portion (page 19-20) of noting approved by DG(NS&M) dated 21.03.2017

Corruption in Centre For Air Borne System (CABS), DRDO, Bangalore

 

To                                                                                          23rd  June 2015

Hon’ble Shri Manohar Parrikar,

Defence Minister,

Room No -104, South Block,

New Delhi-110011

Subject: Corruption in Centre For Air Borne System (CABS), DRDO, Bangalore

Sir,

DRDO is infamous for awarding or routing tenders and contract to their kith & kin. Right from conservancy contracts to any specialized components/sub system/system.  Some of cases, if they are not able to develop any family based firm, than groom as his/her pet vender.

The procurement data of DRDO are self explanatory, these families/relatives or pet firms supplies any damn item irrespective of their field or expertise.

It is also observed the manufacturer always quote higher than pet firm, If any manufacturer has to do business with DRDO then should smell or identify these families/relatives or pet firms and routed his business through these firm only.

In case of Dr V K Sarswat, famous Ex DG, DRDO & SA to RM, presently member of Niti Ayog, GOI, Hon Madras High Court convicted, lot of cases pending in CVO, MoD, the pet firm was M/s SEC Industries Private Limited, Hyderabad, In case of Dr A Subhananda Rao, Ex Director, HEMRL, the pet firm was M/s Resin & Allied, Vijaywada, In case of Dr K Tamilmani, DG (Aero) the pet firm is M/s Aero Space Engineers, Salem, In case of  Dr A K Saxena,DMSRDE, Kanpur the pet firm is M/s Manglam Traders, Kanpur. It is just for example any lay man can spot the pet firm for each lab. DRL, Tezpur found a power supply firm of Hyderabad for their Poly Houses worth corers business.

Website received a letter today from Bangalore which exposes the above expertise in Centre For Air Borne System (CABS), DRDO, Bangalore. Our new Director General cum Secretary belongs to this lab only and might be aware of credentials of this firm of Mrs Suma Verughees’s husband Thomas Verughees the owner of  M/s DRD Software and Systems India Private Limited, Kerala, M/s WAVE MECHANICS PRIVATE LIMITED,Bangalore. M/s COM AVIA , these firms have big business association with DARE, ADA & CABS and some little with ADE

Like his predecessor Dr S Christopher will accommodate this firm in 2015 DRDO award as Technology absorption Award.

Prime Minister, Dr Manmohan Singh presented the DRDO Awards for the year 2007 M/s SEC Industries Pvt Ltd, Hyderabad got Defence Technology Absorption Award

Prime Minister, Dr Manmohan Singh conferred the DRDO Technology Awards-2003 and 2004 and M/s Resins & Allied Products, Vijayawada got Defence Technology Absorption Award.

Prime Minister, Sh Narendra Modi conferred the DRDO Technology Awards-2013    M/s Aero Space Engineers, Salem got Defence Technology Absorption Award.

Sir, countrymen closely watching you’re cleaning and correcting steps in DRDO, results are coming from various fields like restriction the uses of transportation/ curtailing the contract recruitments, controlling procurements, DG warning to Lab Directors, not come with unfeasible projects, identifications of corrupt officials and removing them from important post, approvals for appropriate actions on corrupt senior officials.

Sir, It is requested that give the clear cut directions to PCDA (R&D) to rotate JCDA officials because all procurement manipulation only possible with the help of these IDSA officials. In some places they are occupying these creamy posts more than 10 years and enjoying all legal and illegal facilities from DRDO.

Hope you will analyze the following letter and take appropriate measures to stop these families/relatives or pet firms business in DRDO, which directly affecting the progress of DRDO projects because with these families/relatives or pet firms labs accepting lower quality items.

Regards

Prabhu Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008                                                                                    Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,                                                                                    email id prabhudoon@gmail.com   website www.corruptionindrdo.com      

M/s DRD Software and Systems India Private Limited, Registered in Kerala

M/s WAVE MECHANICS PRIVATE LIMITED Registered in Karnataka

Both firms owned by Thomas Varughese husband of Mrs Suma Varughese, Scietist ‘G’ CABS, DRDO, Seniority 277 in Scientist ‘G’,

Enclosed – copy of letter received from Centre For Air Borne System (CABS), DRDO, Bangalore