Tag Archives: following

Drdo, Uncategorized

Great Example of DRDO for Supporting and Giving Scot-free Passage for Senior Corrupt Officials

Leave a comment

CVC, MoD registered 9 cases against Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena, Ex Director, DMSRDE, Kanpur and other scientists as per CVC the complaints has been sent to CVO, MOD for further action, to Director Vigilance, DRDO with reference No. 1323/2014/Vigilance 9, 3617/2014/Vigilance 9, 5022/2014/Vigilance 9, 13248/2014/ Vigilance 9, etc.

Recently a RTI reply recived on 27 June 2019 at 10:53 AM from CVO, MoD revealed that

(1)      As per records available in the file the following complaints were received 
(i)       Complaint(s) dated 26.12.2013, 17.12.2013, 15.01.2014, 24.12.2013 and 07.01.2014. The matter was examined in consultation with CVC and it had been decided with the approval of the competent authority to take the following action:-

           (A) Close the following complaints

           (i)      Regarding irregularities in procurement of laboratory micro  processor based high temperature furnace.

           (ii)     Irregularities in procurement of antivirus for computers and 

           (iii)    Irregularities in procurement of analytical weighing balance.

(B)       Issue recordable warning to 8 serving officers found involved in irregularities in procurement of high temperature reactor system and 18 serving officers found involved in procurement of chemicals. 

(C)       No action against officers who have retired from service. 

(2)       As contents of the replies/correspondence/file of the DRDO contain information relating to other officials/officers including third party information and disclosing the names of the officers dealing with the matter is barred under Section 8 (1) (g) and (j) of RTI Act, 2005. Moreover disclosure of the information would not serve any larger public interest. 

(3)       As regards complaint letters forwarded by CVC to D(Vig) and further forwarded to DRDO for action, in this connection, it is stated that these dates back to 2013 and 2014 and records of forwarding letters to DRDO of these period are not available.

Question is that the recordable warning to 8+18 scientist are nothing they are the puppets of Director and signed all wrong doings of boss for their promotion not for financial gain.

The Saxena the main culprit and conspirator of case have guts to deny the email exchange with vendor to discuss the requirement and finalize the specs before raising the file and made arrangement to split the order as per financial power and so many evidences are available because of evidences only the recordable warning was issued then how come kingpin escaped scot free.

Second is if reactor’s design is copy right of DMSRDE then what is meaning of M/s De Dietrich Process Systems India Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai mail which received by Dr A K Saxena via Mr Anish Gupta from M/s Manglam Traders with attached annexure

From: Anish Gupta  mangalam26@bsnl.in
Date: Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:54 PM
Subject: Offer for High Temp. Reaction Unit
To: AKSAXENA  arvsaxena@gmail.com

“The line diagram attached is not exactly as per their offer, they have forwarded us understand it will be somehow like the same. As per our line of requirement they will send us in 2 to 3 days.”

Subsequently Dr. Saxena forwarded this mail to Sh JN Srivastava

From: arvind saxena arvsaxena@gmail.com
To: jn_sri@rediffmail.com
Subject: Fwd: Offer for High Temp. Reaction Unit

Dr. Saxena can you explain what does the meaning the following enclosed drawing of 50 Lt Reactor unit, is it your copy right or property of M/s De Dietrich Process Systems India Pvt. Ltd  

DMSRDE’s official can judge themselves  who is …………………………….

And everyone know that DRDO Hqrs is deaf & dumb

Here come the role of DRDO corrupt officials nexus before his retirement of Saxena the then DOP, DHR, DG, HR, Director Vigilance, DRDO played vital role to get vigilance clearance from, CVO, MoD, one can imagine that this clearance cost to Saxena in lots of 0000000

http://bit.ly/2KCNzda

http://bit.ly/31Zxrb0

So it is clear message to all corrupts of DRDO the chain is available at your service do full way corruption in all means and share some to the chain and get clearance.

Now people of India looking with great hope that present DRDO Chairman will weed out the corrupt nexus in DRDO Hq as well as in Labs, the observations shows that the spinning is started and corrupt DRDO officials may blow out from DRDO periphery.. Problem is some corrupt officials of DRDO still holding the roots of corrupt oldies who were basically the responsible of downfall of DRDO.

Drdo

DRDO’s evil eye warder

4 Comments

It’s amazing how technological advancements in India go side by side with the ancient believes that after thousands of years haven’t changed a bit. Just look at the photo – this concoction of green chilies and lime is an evil eye warder, generally known as “nazar battu” or “nimbu-mirchi totka”.

DRDL is DRDO’s missile lab, see the following

Now DRDO will deliver all products with evil eye warder, generally known as “nazar battu” or “nimbu-mirchi totka”.

Drdo

CVO, MOD, RTI regarding Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena

2 Comments

 

To                                                                                                           5 June 2017

Sh. H M Kundaliya

U/Secretary &  CPIO

Room No – 340, Office of Director of Vigilance

B- Wing Sena Bhawan

Rajaji Marg, New Delhi -110105

Hello,

Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005 in respect of complaints against Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena, Director, DMSRDE, Kanpur and as per CVC the complaints has been sent to CVO, MOD for further action, with reference No. 1323/2014/Vigilance 9, 3617/2014/Vigilance 9, 5022/2014/Vigilance 9, 13248/2014/Vigilance 9, etc.

  1. Please provide the present status of all my complaints received by your office till date from CVC.
  2. Please provide the copy of replies received from DRDO by CVO, MOD in respect of my complaints.
  3. Please provide the copies of your forwarding letter to DRDO in respect of my all complaints.

 

Regards

Prabhu Dandriyal

21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008

Phone – 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,

e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website – www.corruptionindrdo.com

 

Registration Number      MODEF/R/2017/51358

Drdo

DRDO Chief is serious to handle sexual harassment cases

5 Comments

DRDO Chief Dr. Selvin Christopher dealing sexual harassment case in good spirit but the mindsets of senior officials not ready to co-op him for change of existing rotten handling process of DRDO. The getting justice in sexual harassment case is near to impossible in DRDO women scientist and employees.

There are number of example exists where DRDO management failed to deliver justice and always successes to buried the complaints.

The DRDO workforce of more than 30000 and nearly 20% women are working different level top to bottom, even in good positions like DG, Directors etc but harassment complaints are reaching to national women commission, national schedule cast commission etc is the clear evidence the failure of dealing these incidents by existing system of DRDO inspite of having good number of women official.

The reason is also very crystal clear the top existing women officials are not competent and got their position not on the basis of merit. That is the reason like so called famous scientist not able to give justice to victimized SRF.

In this darkness suddenly DRDO Chief Dr. Selvin Christopher sends direction to IRDE and ITM to deal these sexual harassment cases in seriously as per rule.

But unfortunately both the labs not taking it seriously the following enclose letter is showing the mindset of senior official of IRDE, who are openly violating the VISHAKHA guidelines of Honorable Supreme Court.

In following letter is clear example that how accused is trying to hostile the witness with putting through Director and the letter is trying to perusing through divisional head to witness.

The DRDO Hq directed to Director IRDE to take appropriate action against Admin Officer who gave false evidence in support of accused officer but till date Director IRDE not dare to take any action.

In ITM accused is enjoying his post/position after getting charge sheet. Here interesting fact of DRDO working that during the period three director handle the file, Mr M Kishor, Dr R S Pundir, as additional Charge and Sh Sanjay Tandon but no one able to shift the accuse from post of admin officer. As per rule everyone knows that what action is required after issuing such serious charge sheet.

The best part of Director’s order is the inquiry should be done as per DOPT F. No. 11013/2/2014-Estt (A-II1) Dated July 16th, 2015 but they forgot the following the rules or just giving privilege to accused to harass and manage the witness as he is holding all executive powers of ITM.

 

As per DOPT F. No. 11013/2/2014-Estt (A-II1) Dated July 16th, 2015

Suspension

  1. A Government servant may also be placed under suspension before or after issue of a Charge Sheet where his continuance in office will prejudice the investigation, for example if there is an apprehension that he may tamper with witnesses or documents. Suspension may also be resorted to where continuance of the Government servant in office will be against wider public interest such as there is a public scandal and it is necessary to place the Government servant under suspension to demonstrate the policy of the Government to deal strictly with officers involved in such scandals. It may be desirable to resort to suspension in case of misdemeanor involving acts of moral turpitude.

Special provisions to deal with threats or intimidation

  1. Disciplinary Authority may also dispense with inquiry under Rule I 9(ii), and action may be taken without the inquiry when the Disciplinary Authority concludes that it is not reasonably practicable to hold such an inquiry. The circumstances leading to such a conclusion may exist either before the inquiry is commenced or may develop in the course of the inquiry. Such situation would be deemed to have arisen:

(i) where the Government servant, through or together with his associates terrorizes, threatens or intimidates witnesses who are likely to give evidence against him with fear of reprisal in order to prevent them from doing so; or

(I) where the Government servant himself or with or through others threatens, intimidates and terrorizes the Disciplinary Authority, Members of the Committee, the Presenting Officer or members of their family.

It is requested DRDO officials please go through the Vishakha Guidelines were a set of procedural guidelines for use in India in cases of sexual harassment. They were promulgated by the Indian Supreme Court in 1997 and were superseded in 2013 by The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013.

Drdo

Sources of Misuse in Procurement in ADE, Bangalore

4 Comments

To                                                                                          5th June 2015                                             Hon’ble Shri Manohar Parrikar,                                                                                                           Defence Minister,                                                                                                                                     Room No -104, South Block,                                                                                                                  New Delhi-110011

Subject: Sources of Misuse in Procurement in ADE, Bangalore

Sir,

There was statement in Business Standard 3rd June “Parrikar, who had earlier said that DPP, the framework for defence procurement, will be out by May, admitted that it will take some more time.

The DRDO officials are the best in fooling the laid down procurement process, how please go through the following letter which was received on 3rd June 2015 with request to publish in website for common people of country to understand the reason of delays and failures of DRDO strategic projects.

It is requested to give direction to PCDA to securitize the all DRDO procurement under light of following letter which was sent by the group of nationalist, honest scientists and who are really concern about organization future.

Regards

Prabhu Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008                                                 Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,                                                  e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com    website www.corruptionindrdo.com

Enclosed – copy of letter received by website fro ADE

copy of letter received by website from ADE
copy of letter received by website from ADE

copy of letter received by website from ADE Page
copy of letter received by website from ADE Page

ADE Rustom Modes oprendi2
copy of letter received by website from ADE

ADE Rustom Modes oprendi envelop

 

 

Drdo

CORRUPTION IN CONSTRUCTION & INSTALLATION OF “NATURALLY VENTILATED GREEN HOUSE WITH MULTILAYERED POLY CARBONATE SHEET” AT DRL, TEZPUR BY DR. RKR SINGH, TECHNICAL OFFICER ‘C’ AND DR. VIJAY VEER, DIRECTOR, DEFENCE RESEARCH LABORATORY(DRL), TEZPUR UNDER DRDO, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE

11 Comments

 To,                                                                                  Date  29th May 2015                                    Chief Vigilance Commissioner,                                                                                                        Central Vigilance Commission,                                                                                                       Satarkta Bhavan,A-Block, GPO Complex,INA,                                                                           New Delhi-110011

 SUBJECT : CORRUPTION IN CONSTRUCTION & INSTALLATION OF “NATURALLY VENTILATED GREEN HOUSE WITH MULTILAYERED POLY CARBONATE SHEET” AT DRL, TEZPUR BY DR. RKR SINGH, TECHNICAL OFFICER ‘C’ AND DR. VIJAY VEER, DIRECTOR, DEFENCE RESEARCH LABORATORY(DRL), TEZPUR UNDER DRDO, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE

Sir,

Following facts regarding corruption and irregularities in construction of “Naturally Ventilated Green House With Multilayered Poly Carbonate Sheet” at DRL, Tezpur by Dr. RKR Singh, Technical Officer ‘C’ AND Dr. Vijay Veer, Director, Defence Research Laboratory, Tezpur is submitting for your investigation and appropriate action.

  1. Defence Research Laboratory (DRL), Tezpur (Assam) is an establishment under Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO), Ministry of Defence.
  2. Vijay Veer, Scientist ‘G’ is Director, DRL, Tezpur with effect from 01 March 2012 to till date and he is superannuating on 31 December 2015.
  3. RKR Singh, Technical Officer ‘C’ is posted at DRL, Tezpur since more than 20 years in DRL, Tezpur. He is Head of High Altitude Agriculture Division at DRL, Tezpur.
  4. A project with details submitted below was sanctioned by competent authority at DRDO HQ to DRL, Tezpur.DRL GH cvc table 1
  5. Some other projects related to installation of Green Houses were also completed by DRL, Tezpur with following details.DRL GH cvc table 2DRL GH cvc table 3

Installation of two Green Houses at DRL, Dett. At Tawang

DRL, Tezpur has two detachments in Arunachal Pradesh. One is at Salari, 190 km from Tezpur and another at Tawang, 380 km away from DRL, Tezpur. DRL Dett., Tawang is situated at 10,000 Ft high from sea level. This area is very less of vegetation due to extreme cold climatic condition. Hence cultivation of vegetables in open environments is not possible.

DRL, Tezpur has installed one Green House at DRL, Dett., Tawang and another Green House in same location is under construction. In this Green House, varieties of vegetable nursery is being raised and are being supplied to those Green Houses installed in different army unit for making vegetables nursery is being raised and are being supplied to those green houses installed in different army unit for making vegetables seeding.

Gross irregularities and violation of Purchase Management 2006 took place in issuing of supply orders for construction and installation of Green Houses at DRL, Tezpur.

One case as case study is submitted herewith in which gross violation of purchase rules took place.DRL GH cvc table 4

(A)   Demand was initiated by Dr. RKR Singh, Technical Officer ‘C’ with following details:DRL GH cvc table 5

(B) Open Tender No. DRL/OT/13-14 was published in Newspapers and DRDO website with following details. DRL GH cvc table 7

(C) Based on the said open tender, supply order was issued with following details.DRL GH cvc table 8

 

(D)  Under Supply Order dated 26.12.2013, Job Completion Certificate was issued from DRL, Tezpur vide letter No. DRL/OT/HAR/11/13-14/S-73 dated with following details:DRL GH cvc table 9

(E)  Unique Power Systems is registered at Andhra Pradesh Commercial Tax Department with TIN – 37720549449 and date of registration 02-06-2014 under VAT and CST commodity MACHINERY, Works Contracts; ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMERS, SWITCH GEARS; MACHINERY SPARES, ALL KINDS OF CABLES; COPPER WIRE.

This vendor has its own website uniquepowersystems.in and Mr. Subbarao Ramisetty is proprietor of this firm. According to the information available on the website “Unique Power Systems” are a leading organization engaged in trading and supplying a variety of Electrical and Electronics Items. We have in store a technically superior range of Transmission Line, Substation, Insulator, Vacuum Circuit Breaker, Generator, Transformer, Speed Breakers, Flexible Cable and MCCB.

6. One Open Tender No. DRL/OT/14-15 was published in 2014 for 05 Green Houses with EMD Rs. 100,000. The demands were made in said open tender and case is under process.

IRREGULATIES AND VIOLATION OF PM 2006 IN CONSTRUCTION & INSTALLATION OF GREEN HOUSES AT DRL, TEZPUR

  • Very junior officer of rank Technical Officer ‘C’ was appointed as Project leader with only one member (STA) in the project which is major project activity of DRL, Tezpur. In past project of Green House more than Five Officer/staff were involved with senior most scientists as Project Head. Keeping only officials in such a big project smacks something wrong at end of Director/CFA.
  • RKR Singh, TO ‘C’ was not authorized to indent case of Rs. 50 L while other several senior scientists were available at DRL, Tezpur. This violates section 4.6.2 and 4.6.3 of PM 2006. Demands costing Rs 50 lakh and above: Initiation by Scientist E and above countersigned by project or group head.
  • The demand was initiated as well as countersigned by Dr. RKR Singh, TO ‘C’ and approved by Dr. Vijay Veer, Director. This violated the various sections of PM 2006.
  • Item cost was inclusive of taxes while as per PM 2006 all taxes should be separately calculated and added in basic cost of the item. Material cost, construction and installation cost should be mentioned separately.
  • In demand unit price was mentioned as Rs. 9,92,331.00 but how the indenter arrived at his cost. How he done cost estimation or he submitted any quotation in record for this cost. The figure of unit cost as mentioned by indenter is unrealistic and fabricated.
  • Board of Officers was not constituted for inspection of constructed Green Houses and handing over to users Amy Units. Issue Voucher should be issued to each Green House separately. Job completion report should be endorsed by Board of Officers.
  • Splitting of cases to keep demand cost with in financial powers of Director as in project of Rs. 4.18 crore small-small cases costing just below Rs. 50 L are initiated. Two open tenders no. DRL/OT/13-14 and DRL/OT/14-15 each costing Rs. 50 L was published within same project by splitting of the cases. One tender should be published to avoid splitting of cases and get better prices and consolidated demand should be raised for whole project as PDC was only 36 months. Hence PM 2006 was grossly violated by Dr. Vijay veer, Director/CFA.
  • As per PM 2006 the Supply Order should be signed for and on behalf of ‘President of India’ in DRDO.MM.16 but this section of PM 2006 was grossly violated by Dr. Vijay Veer, Director/CFA. The supply orders issued by DRL, Tezpur are not in format DRDO.MM.16 and these SO are not signed for and on behalf of India, which is very serious matter as per PM 2006.
  • Cost Estimation not made properly figure of unit price is unrealistic.
  • TEC Report was ignored and parameters effecting installation of Green House like soil testing, wind speed, altitude etc not considered by Director and TPC done without clearance of TEC Report.
  • Gross violation of Purchase Rules, Supply Order not in proper format signed on behalf of Director, DRL, Tezpur, TO ‘C’ is not authorized to indent case up to Rs. 50 L. No sales tax, service tax or VAT charged and prices were inclusive of all taxes. Service tax Registration Number.

7.    The departmental action under CCS(CCA) Rules 1965 and PC Act 1988 may kindly be initiated against Vijay Veer, Director, DRL, Tezpur for said misconduct and misuse of power.

In light of above  facts and evidences it is  requested to CVC to setup a high level inquiry to inspect the procurement process and violation of PM 2006 at DRL, Tezpur by Dr. RKR Singh, TO’C’ and Dr. Vijay Veer , Director in construction and installation of all these Green Houses.

Regards

Prabhu  Dandriyal,                                                                                                                             21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun -248008                                                                               Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website www.corruptionindrdo.com

  • Enclosed – Photo of DRL, Green House, Twang

    Rs 9 Lakh Green House-Tawang-DRL
    Rs 9 Lakh Green House-Tawang-DRL

    DRL GH cvc anx 1DRL GH cvc anx 2DRL GH cvc anx 3

     

Drdo

CVO,MOD, RTI & Reply of CPIO,CVO,MOD

Leave a comment

To                                                                                   17th March 2015
Sh. Sekhar Ranjan Amin,
U/Secretary & CPIO,
Room No 340, Office of Director of Vigilance,
B- Wing Sena Bhawan,
Rajaji Marg, New Delhi -110105

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of corruption complaints against Dr A K Saxena, Director, DMSRDE, DRDO, Kanpur & other officials. The period of complaints is from 29/11/2013 to 11/06/2014.

1.Provide the current status of my following complaints
I.Dated 29/11/2013 OM No 1323/2014/vigilance 9, forwarded to CVO, MoD on 30/01/2014 for necessary action.
II.Dated 17/12/2013 OM No 2056/2014/vigilance 9, forwarded to CVO, MoD on 19/02/2014 for necessary action
III.Dated 24/12/2013 OM No 5022/2014/vigilance 9, forwarded to CVO, MoD on dated 27/03/2014 for necessary action
IV.Dated 26/12/2013 OM No 4979/2014/vigilance 9, forwarded to CVO, MoD on dated 27/03/2014 for necessary action
V.Dated 22/1/2014 OM No 5387/2014/vigilance 9, forwarded to CVO, MoD on dated 31/03/2014 for necessary action
VI.Dated 7/1/2014 OM No 3617/2014/vigilance 9, forwarded to CVO, MoD on dated 14/03/2014 for necessary action
VII.Dated15/1/2014 OM No 3574/2014/vigilance 9, forwarded to CVO, MoD on dated 10/03/2014 for necessary action
VIII.Dated 11/6/2014 OM No 13248/2014/vigilance 9, forwarded to CVO, MoD on dated 24/06/2014 for necessary action
2.CVO, MoD forwarded to DRDO vigilance vide MoD ID note No. 63/DO/ (Vig)/CVC/2014 dated 17/06/2014 with request to submit consolidated report on the complaints against Dr A.K. Saxena and others of DMSRDE, DRDO, Kanpur at the earliest. Please provide the copy of reply of DRDO against your request.
3.Provide copies of replies received by CVO,MoD against above complaints.

Regards
Prabhu Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur,
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com website www.corruptionindrdo.com

Reply of CPIO, CVO, MOD received on 15th May 2015CVO MOD reply on DMSRDE casesCVO MOD reply on DMSRDE cases1

Drdo

RTI-CBI-DRDO

2 Comments

To                                                                               Date 2nd April 2015                                       Shri Sanjeev Gautam,                                                                                                                       Central Public Information Officer,                                                                                               CBI, Plot No. 5-B, Ist FloorA&B Wing,                                                                                           CGO Complex,New Delhi-110003

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of recommendation of CVO, MOD with Diary No. 14320 dated 24.10.2013 forwarded to CBI, New Delhi for probe in recruitment scam of DRDO under Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 with due approval of then Defence Minister Shri A.K. Antony against top ten retired senior Scientists of DRDO.

Regarding the said recommendation of former Defence Minister the News were covered by print media which are also available on website of CBI.

With reference to facts stated above, kindly provide following information under RTI Act 2005.

  1. The status of said recommendation for probe by CBI.
  2. File noting on the recommendation of MOD in recruitment scam case of DRDO.
  3. Whether any FIR has been lodged in the said case by CBI. (Yes/No)
  4. Whether the case is under investigation. (Yes/No)
  5. Whether the case is closed. (Yes/No)

Regards
Prabhu Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur,
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com website www.corruptionindrdo.com

 

Registration Number: MHOME/R/2015/60979

PMO

RTI- DRDO Via PMO

9 Comments

To                                                                             Date  22nd  March 2015
Shri Syed Ekram Rizwi,
Director & Central Public Information Officer,
Prime Minister’s Office,
South Block,
New Delhi 110011

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of corrupt practices following by DRDO.

The applicants already filed hundreds of RTI s to DRDO with the aim of expose their corrupt practices earlier up to end of 2011 I have received 50% informations in the basis of those inputs, I have submitted some corruption complaints to CVC and other agencies partly the action were taken but from mid of 2013 I have only received 10%  informations but no action taken on corruption exposures. Interestingly since end 2013 DRDO stopped giving any informations against RTI applications, whether it is related to corruption or human right. I tried to my best requested RTI with enclosed corruption evidences but to DRDO refuses to all RTI requests under section 24 (1). DRDO have no respect for constitutional provision of GOI.

The following information is requested with evidences which prima facie supported that Dr Tamilmani and other involved in corrupt practices. This information is requesting through PMO because we have faith on Sh Narendra Modi ji government and if, we will not get any response of this RTI than it is a confirmation that PMO is also in the grip of corrupt officers and Modi ji government has no meaning of RTI Act 2005.

  1. Provide the information that Toyota Innova using by Dr K Tamilmani, DG AERO, Director, ADE and others are procured under Project Rustom II as Remote Video Terminal Vehicle as stated in Dr.Hina Gokhle, DHRD
  2. Provide total Toyota Innova/Scorpios/Safaris in the financial 2012/13, 2013/14 & 2014/15 with nomenclature used, project names by DRDO.
  3. Provide the numbers of Directors/establishment Heads/in-charges of various siblings of DRDO using red beacon on their vehicles.
  4. Provide the total amount dispersed as transport allowance in financial year 2014/15 to Directors/establishment Heads/Program Directors/project Directors /in-charges of various siblings of DRDO

Note – The matter is directly related to corruption and not exempted under section 24 1 of RTI Act 2005

Regards
Prabhu Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur,
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com website www.corruptionindrdo.co

Enclosed : 1. Paper cutting of Sunday Ttandard 22nd March 22015

  1.       Photographs of Toyota Innova using by Dr K Tamilmani, Director ADE,                  Director, HEMRL, Director, DMSRDE,
  2.       Dr Hina Gokhle, DHRD letter in respect of vehicle sanction for project        Rustom  II
  1.      Dr Tamilmani January 2015 salary slip

                Registration Number     PMOIN/R/2015/60727sunday standard 22 march 2015Rustom car as DG staff carDirector ADE Toyota Innova

Sh Vikas Bhattacharya, Director, Using this To
Sh Vikas Bhattacharya, Director, Using this

dmsrde director vehicle1Rustom 2 vehicle sanction letter1

The vehicle was procured for Project Rustom in the name of Remote Video Terminal Vehicle. Vide letter No DRDO/02/333/P/2/Vol-II-394/D/R&D date 23/02/2011.
The vehicle was procured for Project Rustom in the name of Remote Video Terminal Vehicle. Vide letter No DRDO/02/333/P/2/Vol-II-394/D/R&D date 23/02/2011.

Dr.K Tamilmani, DG (Aero), DRDO, Bangalore availing the transport allowance Rs 14490. Please see his January pay slip
Dr.K Tamilmani, DG (Aero), DRDO, Bangalore availing the transport allowance Rs 14490. Please see his January pay slip

hemrl tender1