Defense Minister Govt | Corruption In DRDO

From- Dated : 20-06-12

Rajiv Chauhan; 1053/3,Shastri nagar,Meerut(U.P) 09412628314;09258045938;

To, Hon’ble Defense Minister; Govt.of India, New Delhi,

Sub:– DRDO have no reply – taken shelter from RTI section 24(1) in corruption related cases ?

Respected Sir,

Major irregularities in the purchase of 59,000 bullet –proof jackets for security forces, the Home Ministry findings of the testing conducted by a tainted official at DRDO Chandigarh laboratory. The ministry requested the DRDO for initiating disciplinary proceedings against its scientist R.K.Verma, the joint director at the Terminal Ballistics Research Laboratory in Chandigarh.

My RTI related to know the disciplinary proceeding against R.K.Verma. But DRDO have no reply – taken shelter from RTI section 24(1) in corruption related cases?

However major irregularities find out by the ministry of home, but DRDO disciplinary proceedings result is unknown. May possible to promote Mr. R.K.Verma instead of major punishment with the pecuniary arrangement of the Top corrupt officers / scientist?

I request you to take necessary action as per the Home Ministry with those top scientists responsible to provide shelter during disciplinary proceedings.

With high regards,

Your, Sincerely.

(Rajiv Chauhan)

COPY TO THE :

1- Hon’ble President of India for kind consideration and necessary action.

2- Hon’ble Prime minister of India for kind consideration and necessary action.

Rajiv Chauhan

FOR DETAIL PL. SEE ENCLOSERS

Dated : 14-06-12

From- Rajiv Chauhan; 1053/3,Shastri nagar,Meerut(U.P) 09412628314;09258045938;

To, Hon’ble Defense Minister; Govt.of India, New Delhi,

Subject – DRDO Scientist recommendation with false information to grant extension of service for a period of two years beyond the age of 60 years; .

Respected Sir,

This is not a single example which is put up before you that how the recommendations with false information to grant extension of service for a period of two years beyond the age of 60 years; given by the DRDO HQ. Is it a misuse of office for misuse of powers or a pecuniary arrangement with involvement of corruption?

Dr.Rao A Subhananda ; Distinguished Scientist, particulars recommended by the DRDO HQ with false information that ‘NO’ any VIGILANCE proceedings are pending or contemplated against the officer, However in a RTI reply it found that a Vigilance proceeding is pending against the scientist. I hereby enclose that annexure with DRDO HQ false information and related RTI information. Both information is contradictory. Which is a right information, Information given by CVC or given by the DRDO HQ?

I request you to take a suitable and necessary action against the responsible officer, who sent the recommendation with false information to the Govt. of India.

With high regards,

Your’s, Sincerely.