Dated : 14-06-12
From- Rajiv Chauhan; 1053/3,Shastri nagar,Meerut(U.P) 09412628314;09258045938;
To, Hon’ble Defense Minister; Govt.of India, New Delhi,
Subject – DRDO Scientist recommendation with false information to grant extension of service for a period of two years beyond the age of 60 years; .
This is not a single example which is put up before you that how the recommendations with false information to grant extension of service for a period of two years beyond the age of 60 years; given by the DRDO HQ. Is it a misuse of office for misuse of powers or a pecuniary arrangement with involvement of corruption?
Dr.Rao A Subhananda ; Distinguished Scientist, particulars recommended by the DRDO HQ with false information that ‘NO’ any VIGILANCE proceedings are pending or contemplated against the officer, However in a RTI reply it found that a Vigilance proceeding is pending against the scientist. I hereby enclose that annexure with DRDO HQ false information and related RTI information. Both information is contradictory. Which is a right information, Information given by CVC or given by the DRDO HQ?
I request you to take a suitable and necessary action against the responsible officer, who sent the recommendation with false information to the Govt. of India.
With high regards,
COPY TO THE :
1- Hon’ble President of India for kind consideration and necessary action.
2- Hon’ble Prime minister of India for kind consideration and necessary action.