Tag Archives: request

Drdo

CEPTAM RTI Reply

2 Comments
RTI Request to CEPTAM
To                                                                                                           Date 2nd    May 2013
The CPIO                                                                          No RTI//CEPTAM/04/05/2013
Centre for Personnel Management
Defence Research and Development Organisation
MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, Metcalfe House Complex, DELHI-110054 

Hello,

Kindly provide me with the following information requested under purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005.

 1.    Provide the following persons were engaged as experts by CEPTAM for Assessment Boards and Recruitment Board constituted in the year 2012.                                                   2.    If engaged, then number of boards, place, date and total expenses bear by CEPTAM with respect of following persons.                                                                                                   3.    If engaged then their designation, organisation’s name and place of appointment.                4.    Provide the following persons are related (blood or by marriage etc.) with Shri Rajesh Goyal, Director, CEPTAM, if information is not available with CPIO then get this from Shri Rajesh Goyal in writing.                                                                                 5.    If it is establish that following persons related to Shri Rajesh Goyal then a copy of correspondence with higher authority to inform about his relations with following engaged experts.

(i)            Dr Madhu Goyal                                                                                                              (ii)          Mr M C Goyal                                                                                                                   (iii)         Mr Sekhar Gupta                                                                                                        (iv)         Mr Anupam Gupta

Note: – above required information is directly related to corruption and not come under schedule – II

Find the application fee for the request attached with this application. If you feel that above requested information does not pertain to your department then please follow the provisions of Section 6(3) of the RTI act 2005. Also as per the provision of the RTI Act 2005 please provide the details (Name and Designation) of the first appellate authority w.r.t. to your department with the reply to above request, where I may require file first appeal.

I do hereby declare that I am the citizen of India. Kindly provide me with the information at the address mentioned with the application. I request you to ensure that the information is provided before expiry of 30 day period after you have received the application.

Enclosed – Rs 10 Postal Order No  05F – 893650

Regards

Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008
Phone – 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website – www.corruptionindrdo.com
 
RTI Reply by CEPTAM
CEPTAM RTI Reply
CEPTAM RTI Reply

ceptamrtireply0002

RTI Request
To                                                                                                     Date 25th February 2013
The CPIO                                                                             No RTI//CEPTAM/25/2/2013
Centre for Personnel Talent Management
Defence Research and Development Organisation
MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, Metcalfe House Complex, DELHI-110054  

Hello,

Kindly provide me with the following information requested under purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005.

 1.    Provide the number of experts called for Assessment Boards constituted in the year 2012.

(a)  Numbers of Experts from DRDO –                                                                                         (b)  Numbers of Experts from outside DRDO –                                                                          (c)  Numbers of Experts from outside DRDO who are not from the Interview city –        (d)  Numbers of Experts from outside DRDO who are related with CEPTAM officials –

2.     Name, subject of expertise, designation of experts from outside DRDO.                        3.    Copy of If any policy/direction/guidelines available in CEPTAM for constitution of assessment board for different locations.                                                                                    4.    Total expenditure made for outside experts for the year of 2012 assessment boards.   5.    Provide the names of CEPTAM officials if any who are related with outside experts.

Note: – above required information is directly related to corruption and not come under schedule – II

Find the application fee for the request attached with this application. If you feel that above requested information does not pertain to your department then please follow the provisions of Section 6(3) of the RTI act 2005. Also as per the provision of the RTI Act 2005 please provide the details (Name and Designation) of the first appellate authority w.r.t. to your department with the reply to above request, where I may require file first appeal.

I do hereby declare that I am the citizen of India. Kindly provide me with the information at the address mentioned with the application. I request you to ensure that the information is provided before expiry of 30 day period after you have received the application.

Enclosed – Rs 10 Postal Order No  05F – 893652

Regards

Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur
Dehradun-248008
Phone – 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website – www.corruptionindrdo.com
 
 
 
Drdo

DRDO hikes salary, ignores FinMin order

Leave a comment

 ABHINANDAN MISHRA 20th Apr 2013

The Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), increased on its own the pay scale of its officials, thus overlooking the objections by the Ministry of Finance (Department of Expenditure) and Audit authorities, who had turned down the request for the increase. In spite of being asked to stop this, the DRDO ignored the Finance Ministry order and continued to pay the hikes salary, thus causing an annual liability of Rs 9.6 crore.

According to a note dated 10 September 2012 and signed by an under secretary of the Department of Expenditure, Ministry of Finance, upgrading the grade pay of Technical Officers (A) from Rs 4,600 to Rs 4,800, was “irregular, contrary to the accepted recommendation of the Central Pay Commission and in violation of the allocation and transaction of business rules and was undertaken suo moto without reference, much less concurrence, of the Ministry of Finance”. An audit conducted by the defence audit branch (DGADS) for 2011-2012 passed strictures against the DRDO authorities for this action. The audit report said that DRDO officials, during the audit, agreed to recover the amount that was paid to its employees.

“The grant of Grade pay Rs 4,800 did not have the approval of the Ministry of Finance. Department of Expenditure had treated it as ‘irregular’ and asked to withdraw it. During discussion, at the insistence of audit, the DRDO authorities agreed to recover the overpaid amount of Rs 24 cr,” remarked DGADS. Some DRDO officers said that scientists who do not have the required expertise have been entrusted with managing the administration of DRDO.

 

Drdo

RTI – DESIDOC

1 Comment
To                                                                                          25th February 2013
The CPIO                                                   RTI/DESIDOC/RKA/25/2/2013
Defence Scientific Information & Documentation Centre (DESIDOC)
Metcalfe House
New Delhi – 110054

 

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of DRDO Newsletter September 2012 page No -14. In which the details of Outstanding Scientists of the DRDO. Sh, R K Agarwal, Outstanding Scientist, DEAL   “ his main contribution has been the development of NARAD, the first semi-static and transportable terminals developed in the country. These terminals were immediately deployed in SRI LANKA during operation PAWAN where they have played a vital Role.”

  1. The certified copy of his claim for working or association with Project NARAD.
  2. Number of temporary duty if done by Sh R K. Agarwal in connection with Project Narad including deputation to SRI LANKA or any place in India during operation PAWAN.
  3. Provide the copy of DO Part –I published reflecting that Sh R K Agarwal was deputed or associated with Project NARAD, in DEAL, Dehradun
  4. Copy of appreciation letter regarding providing communication during Operation Pawan to IPKF by GOC, IPKF and then S O –in- C.
  5. Number of technical papers published as first author on design aspects of SATCOM systems by Sh R K Agarwal in various publications? Provide the name of Journals /year/page no of publications and issues/ volume numbers.
  6. On  “Throughput Acceleration Satellite Adaptation Unit (SAU)”  and the role and contribution of Sh R K Agarwal  in its patent filing. –

Find the application fee for the request attached with this application. If you feel that above requested information does not pertain to your department then please follow the provisions of Section 6(3) of the RTI Act, 2005/Also as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 please provide the details (Name and Designation) of the first appellate authority w.r.t to your department with the reply to the above request., where I may if required file my first appeal.
I do hereby declare that I am a citizen of India. Kindly provide me with the information at the address mentioned with the application. I request you to ensure that the information is provided before the expiry of the 30 day period after you have received the application.

Note: above required information is directly related to corruption and not come under schedule -II

“Whoever does anything with the intention of causing wrongful gain to one person or wrongful loss to another is said to do that thing dishonesty”  

Enclosed- Rs 10 Postal order 98E 528550

Regards,

Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008
Phone – 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id  prabhudoon@gmail.com,  website- www.corruptionindrdo.com
 
http://drdo.gov.in/drdo/English/index.jsp?pg=rightlinks_archives.jsp
 
DRDO News Letter September 2012

 

Drdo

Complaint against DRDO Employees ,Chandipur

2 Comments
Mail received by www.corruptionindrdo.com
TO,
The DRDO Head Quaters
New Delhi
Sub: Complaint against DRDO Employees ,chandipur
Sir,
  I would like to inform you about the ,DRDO Employees ,chandipur ,These are  job in central  govt. sector ,But they do not work properly are also job  in private sector likely ,some are insurance agent ,Travel agent ,you know also very well  and curruption is not limit in their.,some person who is involve and I want to give the name one is Mr. N.C.Mahapatra and another is Mr. Anjay Singh , both are DRDO Employees ,chandipur ,Balasore ,ODISHA (PXE),pls veryfication all these employees .
   Therefore ,I want to request to you take the necssary action of these employees.
                           Thanking You,
With Regards:
Suraj
Balasore,ODISHA
Drdo

Tatra case: Rishi’s money trail leads CBI to UK

Leave a comment

CNN-IBN India | Updated Apr 08, 2012 at 09:46pm IST

New Delhi: The CBI is looking into the payments made by defence PSU BEML to Tatra Sipox UK for the supply of all terrain trucks and plans to send judicial request to the United Kingdom seeking details of its financial transactions and ownerships.
The agency suspects that payments from BEML were actually going to a tax haven, CBI sources said, adding that they are probing into it but added that the investigations are in preliminary stage.
The sources said at present they are likely to send Letters Rogatory to the UK seeking information on financial transactions of Tatra Sipox UK in which Vectra Chairman Ravinder Rishi has been a Director, owning substantial shares.
The agency will also demand details of Tatra Sipox UK’s association with Czech-republic based Tatra a.s, they said.
Rishi has refuted allegations of any wrong doing and is said to be co-operating with the agency during his questioning sessions during last week, the sources said.
The CBI is now focusing on the role of officials of Defence Ministry, BEML and army and may question them in connection with the case soon, they said.
The sources said it was in 1997 that Tatra Sipox UK signed the truck supply deal with BEML which was in alleged violation of defence procurement rules which say that procurement should be done directly from original equipment manufacturer only.
The CBI has alleged that since Tatra Sipox UK was not the original manufacturer of these all terrain trucks, the rule that defence procurements should be made from original
manufacturer was violated.
Meanwhile, Czech Republic-based Tatra a.s. had said in a statement that it supplies for India various truck components (“CKDs”) that make up approximately 30 to 35 per cent of a complete vehicle.
“The remaining components are made or supplied by other manufacturers or by BEML, an Indian government controlled company that also assembles the Tatra branded vehicles and then sells and delivers them to customers within India under license agreement for Tatra a.s,” it had said in a statement.
It had also stated that neither Ravi Rishi nor his investment company Vectra Limited, control or have controlled — directly or indirectly — Tatra a.s. “The British company Vectra Limited is a minority stakeholder in Tatra holdings and in principle holds one of
the four votes.
“Nonetheless, Tatra will request from Mr Rishi and Vectra Limited an explanation of the information about any initiated investigation of him and Vectra Ltd by Indian Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) as it relates to sales of products branded with the ‘Tatra’ name,” it had said in a statement.

Drdo

SFCIANS, SF COMPLEX, DRDO, JAGDALPUR – DOP, DRDO IS DEAF & DUMB

2 Comments

13th September 2011

SFCIANS, SF COMPLEX, DRDO, JAGDALPUR – DOP, DRDO IS DEAF & DUMB

The reply of my RTI related to SFCian issue was denied by DRDO Hqrs under the shelter of Schedule- II of RTI Act 2005.

As per section 19 of RTI Act 2005 I have appealed to DRDO Hqrs appellate authority and as you very well know that he is deaf & dumb for humanity issues and only act fast on personal issues  in which he has some personal interest. So reply is known but we will take this issue up to supreme authorities.

Hope for best……………………

My RTI Request –

To                                                                                                      19 September 2011                                                 
CPIO & Addl Director, DRDO HQ
Room No. 314A
DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg
New Delhi – 110105

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the  Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect SF Complex, JAGDALPUR

1)            The official address of SF Complex (one of the labs/Establishment of DRDO), JAGDALPUR?

2)            Copy of D O part order or any other order regarding the place of reporting duty at Plant Girola Village which is 40 Kms away from Jagdalpur.

3)            Copy of   D O part order any other order in which the employees posted at SF complex first they report to duty at SF Complex then report for duty at Girola Plant Site.

4)            The copies of movement order of transports which carries the employees daily to Girola plant site from SF Complex from 1/7/2011 to 15/07/2011

5)            The copy of fitness certificates of those vehicles which carries the employees daily to Girola plant site from SF Complex from competent authority.

Find the application fee for the request attached with this application. If you feel that above requested information does not pertain to your department then please follow the provisions of Section 6(3) of the RTI Act, 2005/Also as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 please provide the details (Name and Designation) of the first appellate authority w.r.t to your department with the reply to the above request., where I may if required file my first appeal.
I do hereby declare that I am a citizen of India. Kindly provide me with the information at the address mentioned with the application. I request you to ensure that the information is provided before the expiry of the 30 day period after you have received the application.

Note: above required information is directly related to corruption and human right not come under schedule -II – why because it is noticed that without proper movement orders and without proper maintained vehicles the employees of SF complex are going daily at Girola plant. Earlier in one accident case it is heard that the movement order was made by SF Complex administration in back date to give financial benefits to the deceased family.

Enclosed- Rs 10 Postal order  90E611227

Regards,

 

Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008
Phone – 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
E-mail id prabhu@dandriyal.com, prabhudoon@gmail.com

CPIO, DRDO’s Denial

CPIO, DRDO’s Denial

First Appeal to Appellate Authority of DRDO  12th September 2011

 The Right to Information Act, 2005

First Appeal for Central Govt.

I.D. No_________ Date: _________ [For office use]

To                                                                                                                   

Dr Arun Kumar
OS & Director, Directorate of Personal
Room No.-217, DRDO Bhawan , Rajaji Marg
New Delhi – 110105

Sir,
As I am aggrieved by decision/no decision of Central Public Information Officer, I hereby file this appeal for your kind decision.

The reply of CPIO, DRDO, is completely confusing, misleading, incorrect, unjustified and willful not give any information, does not following the spirit of RTI Act 2005.

The information asked about SF Complex Jagdalpur is not come any norms of secrecy. I am not asking about any work or project information of SF Jagdalpur Unit.
1. Details of appellant
1.1       Full Name:                  Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
1.2.      Full Address:               21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008
1.3       Phone/Cell No.            0135-2787750 / 919411114879
1.4       Email ID:                     prabhu@dandriyal.com

2. Details of CPIO:
2.1 Name/Designation:           Dr A K Tyagi, CPIO, Head RTI Cell, Scientist ‘F’
2.2 Full Address :                    Room No 314 A, DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg, New Delhi -110105
2.3 Name of Public Authority: DRDO, Ministry of Defence, Government of India

3. Details of RTI application to CPIO:
Date of Application  : 19th July  2011
Mailed on:   19th July  2011
by  speed post

4. Particulars of payment of filing fee:
Paid Rs.10/- by   Postal Order No. 90E 611227

5. Details of information sought:

1)      The official address of SF Complex (one of the labs/Establishment of DRDO), JAGDALPUR?

2)       Copy of D O part order or any other order regarding the place of reporting duty at Plant Girola Village which is 40 Kms away from Jagdalpur.

3)            Copy of   D O part order any other order in which the employees posted at SF complex

first they report to duty at SF Complex then report for duty at Girola Plant Site.

4)      The copies of movement order of transports which carries the employees daily to Girola plant site from SF Complex from 1/7/2011 to 15/07/2011

5)    The copy of fitness certificates of those vehicles which carries the employees daily to Girola plant site from SF Complex from competent authority.

Note: above required information is directly related to corruption and human right not come under schedule -II – why because it is noticed that without proper movement orders and without proper maintained vehicles the employees of SF complex are going daily at Girola plant. Earlier in one accident case it is heard that the movement order was made by SF Complex administration in back date to give financial benefits to the deceased family.

6. Particulars of Decision of CPIO:

Date of CPIO’s  Decision:9th August 2011

Date of receipt of decision by the appellant:12th August 2011

7. Brief facts of the case: 

The official address of SF Complex is “SF COMPLEX, AIRPORT TERMINAL BUILDING, JAGDALPUR-494001”. SFC Employees are given appointment letters with above address as reporting place. But, all are forced to report at the above address as well as at its work centre located at Girola village, Bakawand block, Bastar district. This location is completely out of 40 Kms away from municipality (Jagdalpur) of the official address.

As per rule they should report at the place of posting as per the appointment letter. But it is not so. Is it (forcing to report at other place) not violation of an employee’s right to report at the posting place? The management says that reporting place is at Girola and same time management says Airport terminal building, Jagdalpur. It is clear cut case of harassment of employees of SF Complex.

One example: one of the scientists, named Shri Kushal Sahoo, was killed in an accident near Bakawand last year while returning from the Girola site to Jagdalpur in Bolero vehicle. Bakawand police station filed FIR and accident report (can refer the same with the police station). When settling the case the DRDO HQs asked the official movement order to consider it as death while performing duty. As the movement order was not issued actually for him and few more travelling in the same vehicle they were also injured, management of SF Complex made a statement of case stating that “Kusahl Sahoo is travelling for the purpose of meeting at Airport Terminal Building, Jagdalpur office”.

If the travelling from Jagdalpur to Girola and back is official and as per the rule and the rule position should be clear for all for management, employees and the general public. After this accident all the staff of SF Complex Jagdalpur took a decision and reported at posting place only. This happened for two days and later management has interfered and threatened to them for report at Girola and told them if they will not report at Girola, will get termination letter.  Employees were forced to report at Girola. It is a violation of Human Right? Reporting at posting place is not correct? Then why appointment letters were given like that?  DRDO has to duty to provide them proper necessary papers as per rule position of Central Government.

The requested information is not come under 8(1) (a) and 24 (1) of the RTI Act at all because the information asked not in the nature of secrecy like The copy of fitness certificates of those vehicles which carries the employees daily to Girola plant site from SF Complex from competent authority. This the major concern of family and friends of employees of SF complex for their safety and well beings. For mere few thousand Rupees from contractors as bribe the Top DRDO officials playing with the life of SF Complex Employees.

The required information is fall under corruption and as well as violation human right and therefore in any means it is not come under schedule –II exemption of RTI Act 2005.

“RTI is a key instrument for imposing democratic values, accountability and transparency in our public administration,” Dr.Shah Faisal (IAS topper 2010 & RTI activist of J&K RTI Movement NGO) told Sakàl Times

8. Reasons/grounds for this appeal:
i)     To know the sensitiveness and work environment of DRDO
  ii)     To expose the corrupt practices prevailing in DRDO

9. Any other information in support of appeal: 
10. Prayer/relief sought for: 

It is requested that please provide me correct information as per request of my RTI dated 19th   July 2011   in larger public interest, because it is directly related to corruption and violation of Human rights.
11. Enclosures: 

i)              My RTI request dated  19th July 2011   
ii)              Denial of CPIO, DRDO Hqrs dated 09 August 2011
 
12. Declaration:

I hereby state that the information and particulars given above are true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I also declare that this matter is not previously filed with any information commission nor is pending with any Court or tribunal or authority.

Regards

Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008
Phone – 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhu@dandriyal.com website www.corruptionindrdo.com
Blogspot

RTI request to expose the corruption in DRDO

Leave a comment
To
The CPIO
DEAL, Raipur Road
DEHRADUN – 248001
Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005. 
1.       M/S Wave Components System Associates (India) Ph – / fax -26225293  M-39 (LGF), Chitranjan Park
New Delhi – 110019 is or was registered firm in DEAL, Dehradun and supplied various material/items vide different supply orders.
2.       M/S Celestia Impex Pvt. Ltd Ph/fax-26225293   557, Tower-II , Kailash Apatment  New Delhi- 110065
is  or was  registered firm in DEAL, Dehradun and supplied various material/items vide different supply orders.
i)                    Kindly provide copy of above both the firms registration at DEAL, Dehradun
ii)                   Sales Tax number of above both the firms
iii)                 PAN umbers of above both the firms
iv)                 Copy of Supply orders of closed cases up to 2004 of both the firms
v)                  Payment details of respective supplies from both the firms up to 2006
Note: above required information is directly related to corruption and not come under schedule -II
Find the application fee for the request attached with this application. If you feel that above requested information does not pertain to your department then please follow the provisions of Section 6(3) of the RTI Act, 2005/Also as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 please provide the details (Name and Designation) of the first appellate authority w.r.t to your department with the reply to the above request., where I may if required file my first appeal.

I do hereby declare that I am a citizen of India. Kindly provide me with the information at the address/email id mentioned with the application. I request you to ensure that the information is provided before the expiry of the 30 day period after you have received the application. 

Enclosed- Rs 10 Postal order 60E034426

Regards,
Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur
Dehradun-248008
Phone – 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879, e-mail id prabhu@dandriyal.com
Date – 26-05-2010
Place-DEHRADUN
Reply of CPIO, DEAL 
CPIO, DEAL Letter No DEAL/RTI/2010/38 Dated 31st May 2010 (mentioned that Para i) to iv) of my request is will be disclosed after third party consent. Para –v information relates to the stores procured from two firms for sensitive projects being progressed by DEAL, information denied.

Now I appealed  with  Dr. Prahlada, Appellate Authority, CC R&D

Date 10th July 2010
RTI/FAA/DEAL/FF/10/7/2010


To                                                                                 To
The Finance Secretary                                              The Chief Information Commissioner
Room No.- 130, North Block                                     CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
New Delhi-110001                                                     August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Kama Place                 
                                                                                      NEW DELHI 110066
To
Smt. Nita Kapoor                                                        To
Secretary (Defence Finance)                                    The Central Vigilance Commissioner
139, South Block, New Delhi                                     Central Vigilance Commission
                                                               &n
bsp;                       Satarkta Bhawan, GPO Complex
                                                                                       Block-A, INA, NEW DELHI – 110023
To                                                                                           
Dr.S.C.Pandey                                                                      
Additional Financial Adviser (P) & JS                       To             
537, DRDO Bhavan, Rajaji Marg                               The PCDA (R&D)       
New Delhi-110105                                                       West Block – V,  R. K. Purum
                                                                                        New Delhi – 110 066
The Right to Information Act, 2005
First Appeal for Central Govt.

I.D. No_________ Date: _________ [For office use] 

To                                                                                                                   
Dr. Prahlada, Appellate Authority, CC R&D (Ae & SI) & DS,
Room No.439, DRDO Bhawan , Rajaji Marg
New Delhi – 110105

Sir,
As I am aggrieved by decision/no decision of Central Public Information Officer, I hereby file this appeal for your kind decision. 

1. Details of appellant
1.1       Full Name :                 Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
1.2.      Full Address :             21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008
1.3       Phone/Cell No.            0135-2787750 / 919411114879
1.4       Email ID :          prabhu@dandriyal.com Blog – http://corruptionindrdo.blogspot.com


2. Details of CPIO:
2.1 Name/Designation:           Sh. PK Sharma, Scientist ‘G’ CPIO, DEAL, DEHRADUN
2.2 Full Address :                    DEAL, Raipur Road, Dehradun -248001
2.3 Name of Public Authority: DEAL, DRDO, Ministry of Defence

3. Details of RTI application to CPIO:
Date of Application  : 31st  May  2010
Mailed on:  28th  May 2010
by  speed post 
 
4. Particulars of payment of filing fee:
Paid Rs.10/- by   Postal Order No. 60E034426
5. Details of information sought:
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005. 
1.    M/S Wave Components System Associates (India) Ph – / fax -26225293  M-39 (LGF), Chitranjan Park
New Delhi – 110019 is or was registered firm in DEAL, Dehradun and supplied various material/items vide different supply orders.
2.    M/S Celestia Impex Pvt. Ltd Ph/fax-26225293   557, Tower-II , Kailash Apatment  New Delhi- 110065
is or was  registered firm in DEAL, Dehradun and supplied various material/items vide different supply orders.
i)              Kindly provide copy of above both the firms re
gistration at DEAL, Dehradun
ii)             Sales Tax number of above both the firms
iii)            PAN umbers of above both the firms
iv)           Copy of Supply orders of closed cases up to 2004 of both the firms
v)            Payment details of respective supplies from both the firms up to 2006
6. Particulars of Decision of CPIO:
    i)      CPIO, DEAL Letter No DEAL/RTI/2010/38 Dated 31st May 2010 (mentioned that Para i) to iv) of my request is will be disclosed after third party consent. Para –v information relates to the stores procured from two firms for sensitive projects being progressed by DEAL, information denied. (Copy enclosed)
   ii)      CPIO, DEAL Letter DEAL/RTI/2010/Misc dated 29th June 2010 Para – 4 information completely denied (Copy enclosed)

7. Brief facts of the case: 
Why did they call it sensitive? I never asked the project details, I only asked for the procurement details and they can’t be sensitive, because they are procured from an open market with tender.
Dr A.S Bains, then Director, DEAL, DRDO, Dehradun, when appointed in DRDO at DRDL, Hyderabad, who did the police verification? The Shah Times News Report (Copy enclosed) says that he might be relation with “Babar Khalsa” terrorist outfit, who was active in Punjab insurgency and had Hqrs in England.
The money minted by Dr. A. S. Bains with few of his close associates by establishing these fake firms might be used for supporting terrorist outfits. At that time Dr. A. S. Bains was the Director, DEAL; orders were placed with these firms for the supply of items in quantity with enormously high prices and siphoned the precious foreign currency.
DRDO Hqrs since the expose of this case has come under pressure and has declared the purchase made, as sensitive. The officers who were Scientist ‘C/D’ during that period, were given out of turn promotions as reward to conceal the facts. Sh. R.P. Dixit, Sc’G’ and holding presently the charge of CFA in DEAL, Sh.S.C Jain Sc’G’  due to retirement has been given two years extension. Dr. K.D.Nayak Sc ‘H’, CC R&D and Sushil Verma, Sc’F’ were involved and were the master designer of these procurement from fake firms and as well as concealing the facts.
Dr. V.K.Atre, then SA to RM has a very close association with Dr.AS Bains, in fact Dr.Atre made him member of Sh. Arun Singh committee on defence expenditure, when I brought the facts of Dr.AS Bains to then NSA, Sh Brijesh Mishra personally. Dr.AS Bains was removed by each and every committee and was confined to DEAL only until he retired.
The appellate authority of DRDO, Dr. Prahlada is committed to protect Dr. A
S Bains and go to any extent to conceal the facts.
Only an independent agency is therefore required to investigate the total no of procurements cases / supplies under place with these fake firms and identify those culprits who still protecting the criminals.
During US sanction the uses of Custom Duty Exemption Certificates by these firms is required to be investigated, because to see the proximity with Dr.AS Bains the CDE’s might be used for benefiting terrorist outfits of Punjab.
i)      Both firms did business only with DEAL, Dehradun and belongs to one person  Lt.Col Deepak Badhwar, Resident of 37/7, Vijay Colony, Dehradun ( IB revealed and IB report is enclosed)
ii)     He is a good friend of Dr. A. S. Bains’s (then Director DEAL, Dehradun) ( News paper revealed copy enclosed)
iii)    Dr. A. S. Bains  (then Director DEAL, Dehradun) is a mysterious personality and might  be link with terrorist  as per news paper report (Paper cutting enclosed)
iv)   As per Tender Procurement Committee the supplied were state of art components/devices and were in the critical list of post US sanctions.   
v)    So question is whether both firms used CDE or not because they cannot import these items from US due to sanction.
vi)   It is the larger possibilities that with bonding with Dr. A. S. Bains the CDE might be used for support to terrorist outfit.
 Dr. A. S. Bains (then Director DEAL, Dehradun) aim was to damage the organization’s financial deals and help his friends, who were parting the hefty commission/omission. Example – a purchase of Digital display Synthesizer (DDFS) which was required for Composite Net Radio (CNR a prestigious project of DEAL), he directed project in-charge to put his friend’s company’s name (M/S Wave Components & Systems, 1409 W, Woodcrest, Fullerton CA 92833, USA) in the quotation enquiry. The best part of that the firm’s rep supplied the item in person (in the shape of scrape which is still lying with CNR project) at DEAL’s gate well before the quotation’s opening date and with item there were no papers enclosed that the items were imported from US. The plea was given by firm’s rep that his luggage was stolen at airport.  It can be verified with DEAL’s gate records. The matter was exposed by me, the file was closed but he had to give money to his friend, so again a new file was raised as per direction in proprietary base case with new nomenclature as DDES instead of DDFS, order were placed to US, LC opened, money was drawn but the item were not send from US. As expected that he had already delivered back at DEAL’s gate. After two years RBI asked for FE settlement, and then DEAL asked the firm to send anything against the said supply. But because of the Pokhran Blast, US sanction was imposed and company was not able to supply, but again they adopted DRDO’s Scientist gimmicked and arranged locally, a bogus airway bill no and with empty box they deposited via their Delhi based firm by courier. They forget that they established a relation between a firm and later on in other quotation they used this firm as their competitive.
M/s Wave Components and Systems          Contact Person – Mr.Manikant Thakur
1409 –W, Woodcrest                                     Ph – 310-541-3617
Fullertone, CA- 92833
Residence of Mr.ManiKant Takur as per US municipal records 
i)              Mr. Manikant Takur has accepted that he is good friend of Dr.A.S.Bains to Tahalka Correspondent Mr. Shashi
ii)             The above firms received crores of rupees order from DEAL. The origin and existence of this firm is also mysterious.
iii)            The firms deals with only DEAL, Dehradun
iv)           The firms have no dealership of any manufactures
v)            The firm does not have a single leaflet/brochure’s/any professional existing document which proves that they are very well in the business later on due course of CBI inquiry they generated few but they found bogus.
vi)           The firm supplied MMIC components/Li batteries, quartze crystal etc. It shows big variation in business field