IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 3610/2015 & CM No.6436/2015 (for directions).
PRABHU DANDRIYAL ….. Petitioner
Through: Mr. R. Sathish, Adv.
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ….. Respondents
Through: Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC and Naginder
Benipal, Adv. for R-1 to 3.
Mr. R.V. Sinha and Mr. A.S. Singh,
Advs. for R-5.
Mrs. Rajdipa Behura, SSP with Mrs.
Monica Gupta, Adv. for R-8.
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
O R D E R
Heard both parties.
The learned counsel appearing for the respondents no.1 to 3 states that the report of the Fact Finding Inquiry is ready and the same will be filed in a sealed cover during the course of the day.
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J
Strange thing of this case is no above mentioned respondents Advocates were physical present there.
Second is the request of respondents no.1 to 3 for submit the report of Fact Finding Inquiry will be filed in a sealed cover.
It itself proves that DRDO afraid to show the fact finding committee reports because the corruption will be expose or manipulation in fact finding inquiry will be expose.
Same report is also asked by Loksabha unstarred question no 6929, any how matter will going to expose either by High court or by Loksabha.