Poor Tax payer money wasted to save corrupt DRDO officials – RTI – MOD (Sh.G MALAKONDIAH, CC (R&D), DRDO, (DOB 1-Jan-1951Retiring on 31st December )(Supreme Court Stay Order)

To 30^th September 2014

Sh A. M. Manichan,

Under Secretary (IC-IV), CPIO,

Ministry of Defence,

Department of Defence,

Sena Bhavan, New Delhi

Hello,

Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005 in respect of Sh.G MALAKONDIAH, CC (R&D), DRDO held guilty for civil contempt under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and punished with Simple Imprisonment for a period of three weeks and also pay a fine of Rs.2,000/ by Honorable Madras High Court on 24.09.2014. Subsequently Sh.G MALAKONDIAHfiled an appeal in SUPREME COURT OF INDIA on 25^th September 2014 and got stay on Madras High Court order of 24^th September 2014. In Supreme Court there are four advocates were present for appellant Sh.G MALAKONDIAH

For Appellant(s) Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, AG

Mr. R. Bala, Adv.

Mr. R.K. Verma, Adv.

Mr. B. V. Balaram Das, Adv.

Provide the Ministry of Defence rule position for providing advocates to government servant.
Number of advocates
Limit of fees
The criteria for providing advocates
In case of Sh.G MALAKONDIAH provide the total expenditure done by Ministry of Defence.
Provide the advocate fee given to each one for Sh.G MALAKONDIAH case.

Regards

Prabhu Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun -248008
0135- 2787750, 9411114879,
prabhudoon@gmail.com, www.corruptionindrdo.com Registration Number MODEF/R/2014/61806

ITEM NO.56 COURT NO.4 SECTION XII

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Civil Appeal Diary No(s). 31977/2014

G MALAKONDIAH Appellant(s)

VERSUS

S. JOSEPH RAJ AND ORS

Respondent(s)

(with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/copy as well as plain copy of the impugned order and permission to file appeal. And office report)

WITH C.A. D 31978/2014

(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/copy as well as plain copy of the impugned order and appln.(s) for permission to file appeal. and Office Report)

Date : 26/09/2014 This appeal was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA CHANDRA PANT

For Appellant(s) Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, AG

Mr. R. Bala, Adv.

Mr. R.K. Verma, Adv.

Mr. B. V. Balaram Das,Adv.

For Respondent(s) Mr. V. Balaji,Adv.

Mr. Asai Thambi, Adv.

Mr. Rakesh K. Sharma, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

Permission to file appeal is granted.Perused the photocopy of the certified copy of the order dated 24.09.2014 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Signature Not Verified Judicature at Madras in Contempt Petition No. 1711 of 2012.

Digitally signed by

Rajni Mukhi

Date: 2014.09.29

12:12:10 IST

Reason: Petitioner is allowed two weeks’ time to file affidavit enclosing the copy of the said order.

Notice be issued on respondents returnable within four weeks. Dasti, in addition, is permitted.

Mr. Rakesh K. Sharma, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of Respondent No.1. He may file counter affidavit within three weeks. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, be filed within a week thereafter.

In the meantime, the order dated 24 th September, 2014 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Contempt Petition No. 1711/2012 arising out of Writ Petition No. 13067/2005 and sub Application No. 602 of 2012 shall remain stayed.

(Rajni Mukhi) (H.S. Parasher)

Sr. P.A. Court Master

Main Menu

Leave a Reply Cancel reply