THE CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Kama Place
NEW DELHI 110066
Appeal / Complaint No. ________dated__________
[For office use only]
As I am aggrieved by decision/no decision of Central Public Information Officer and First Appellate Authority, I hereby file this appeal/complaint for your kind decision.
1. Details of appellant/complainant
1.1 Full Name: Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
1.2. Full Address: 21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun, Uttarakhand Pin 248008
1.3 Phone/Cell No.: 0135-2787750 Cell No 09411114879
2. Details of CPIO
2.1 Name/Designation: Sh. PK Sharma, Scientist ‘G’ CPIO, DEAL, DEHRADUN
2.2 Full Address: DEAL, Raipur Road, DEHRADUN
2.3 Name of Public Authority: DRDO, Ministry of Defence
3. Details of First Appellate Authority [FAA]:
3.1 Name/Designation of the FAA: Sh. S Sundaresh, CC R&D,
3.2 Full Address of FAA: Room No 414 A , DRDO Bhawan, Rajai Marg, New Delhi -110105
4. Dates of RTI application/first appeal:
4.1 To CPIO: 26 May 2010 & mailed on: 26 May 2010
4.2 To FAA: 10 July 2010 & mailed on: 10 July 2010
5. Particulars of Decisions:
5.1 Reference No & Date of CPIO’s Decision: 31st May 2010 Letter No DEAL/RTI/2010/38
5.2 Reference No & Date of FAA’s Decision: 16th August 2010 DIITM/02/2091/P/2010-19
5.3 Date/s of personal hearing by FAA: No personal hearing by FAA
6. Dates of receipt of replies by appellant/complainant from: 19th August 2010
6.1 CPIO: 2nd June 2010
6.2 FAA: 19th August 2010
7. Details of information sought: My RTI to DEAL, Dehradun
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005.
M/S Wave Components System Associates (India) Ph – / fax -26225293 M-39 (LGF), Chitranjan Park
New Delhi – 110019 is or was registered firm in DEAL, Dehradun and supplied various material/items vide different supply orders.
- M/S Celestia Impex Pvt. Ltd Ph/fax-26225293 557, Tower-II , Kailash Apatment New Delhi- 110065
is or was registered firm in DEAL, Dehradun and supplied various material/items vide different supply orders.
i) Kindly provide copy of above both the firms registration at DEAL, Dehradun
ii) Sales Tax number of above both the firms
iii) PAN umbers of above both the firms
iv) Copy of Supply orders of closed cases up to 2004 of both the firms
v) Payment details of respective supplies from both the firms up to 2006
Note: above required information is directly related to corruption and not come under schedule -II
8. Brief facts of the case:
- CPIO, DEAL Letter No DEAL/RTI/2010/38 Dated 31st May 2010 (mentioned that Para i) to iv) of my request is will be disclosed after third party consent. Para –v information relates to the stores procured from two firms for sensitive projects being progressed by DEAL, information denied. ( copy enclosed)
- CPIO, DEAL Letter DEAL/RTI/2010/Misc Para – 4 information completely denied (Copy enclosed)
i) Both the firms belong to same person Retd. Lt Col .Deepak Badhwar and supplied plenty of sophisticated high technology electronics components to DEAL in mysterious way worth corers of rupees.
ii) Participated in same tender as competitive bidder
iii) Never imported the ordered component (Please refer the enclosed RTI reply by custom department)
iv) The Custom says that nothing was imported from these firms then the custom duty exemption certificate issued by DEAL – where it was used?
v) Here the big question arise from where they sourced the components – as per reliable sources that the components sourced from DRDL , Hyderabad and because of large quantity the both firm asked that split the order so they can easily rotate the components with help of then Director, DEAL Dr.A S Bains.
vi) IB report is enclosed where they revealed that the owner both firms is friend of then Director, DEAL and only involved in rice export to US turn in electronics supplier.
vii) Both firms did business only with DEAL, Dehradun.
9. Reasons/grounds for this appeal / complaint:
i) To stop the corrupt practices prevailing in DRDO
ii) It is clear cut case of corruption and national security interest.
iii) A holistic approach of expose the weak procurement process of DRDO in the name of façade secrecy
iv) I have sent again a request to FAA for reviewing his decision copy CIC but no information was received.
10. Any other information in support of appeal/complaint:
i) I requested top financial authorities of Government of India and all responded and seriously take the issue of national interest. (copy enclosed)
ii) CVC is already taken it as complain and doing needful action to save the our premier organization DRDO from corrupt official. (copy enclosed)
iii) Copy of my request to FAA for reviewing his decision.
11. Prayer/relief sought for:
i) It is requested that please provide me correct information as per request of my RTI dated 31st May 2010 in larger public interest, because it is directly related to corruption and poor tax payers money.
12. Grounds for prayer/relief sought for: – sake of national security interest and stop the corrupt practices prevailing in DRDO.
13. Personal Presence at hearing: YES / NO –Yes
I hereby state that the information and particulars given above are true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I also declare that this matter is not previously filed with this commission
nor is pending with any Court or tribunal or authority.
Place: Dehradun Date: 16th Nov 2010
Signature of appellant/complainant