Tag Archives: worth

RTI to DRDO Development of Custom made Analytical Software for Bullet Resistance Jacket

it is observed that in DRDO all labs are procuring software worth crores of Rupees from poor tax payers money and most of software pirated or from open sources.    As per reliable sources in some case new recruited scientist are soft targets for worn out senior scientists they exploit them to encourage to develop software modules and after development they procure same software procured in projects through  their beloved  firms.

To,                                                                                                   12 June 2019

Shri Deepak Mishra,Scientis ‘F’, CPIO,

Room No 314, DRDO HQ, Min. of Defence

DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg

New Delhi-110011

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of  supply order of Rs 1495250.00 vide No DMSRDE/17AR0054/CMP/CMS-II Dated  4 Oct 2016 for  Development of custom made analytical Software code for predicting ballistic resistance of Bullet resistance jacket (BRJ) and supplied by Pune base firm ZESUS NUMRIX on 2 Feb 2017 Received in DMSRDE on 10 Feb 2017. The copy of Supply order and Receiving slip of software CD plus accessories are enclosed for your ready reference.

  1. Provide the certified copy of physical availability supplied CD plus accessories from JCDA representative.
  2. If available then provide the utilization certificate by DRDO Hq representative.

 

Note – the matter is related to corruption it is observed that in DRDO all labs are procuring software worth crores of Rupees from poor tax payers money and most of software pirated or from open sources.

Regards

Prabhu  Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur,

Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website www.corruptionindrdo.com

     Registration Number   MODEF/R/2019/51806

Antony talks tough, says will cancel ‘murky’ deals

TNN Mar 30, 2012, 01.32AM IST

NEW DELHI: India will not hesitate for a moment to cancel any defence deal, even if it’s in the final stages of finalization after technical and commercial evaluations, if any malpractice or corruption is found in it.

With murky wheeling and dealing in arms deals again resurfacing after Army chief General V K Singh’s allegations as well as some unsubstantiated charges of irregularities in the $20-billion MMRCA project doing the rounds, defence minister A K Antony on Thursday made it clear that action would be taken even if the contract had already been inked.

India, said Antony, had enough safeguards like the “integrity pact” to protect its “interests and money” in already-inked contracts worth over Rs 100 crore. “We will take strong action if any malpractice, corruption or lobbying is established…there will be no mercy, there is zero-tolerance for corruption,” he said while speaking at the inauguration of the ‘DefExpo-2012’ here.

As for the MMRCA (medium multi-role combat aircraft) project, under which final commercial negotiations are now being held to acquire 126 French Rafale fighters after elimination of other contenders, Antony said an inquiry was being conducted into an MP’s complaint of alleged wrongdoings in it since the government has to be “careful” at every stage to ensure “no foul play”.

Two of the 15 members in the defence ministry’s Contract Negotiation Committee (CNC) have questioned the methods adopted to conclude that Rafale was cheaper than Eurofighter Typhoon in lifecycle costs.

“But the matter was resolved, with the observations of the two being recorded…all committees face dissent from one or more members…it does not mean the process will come to a stop,” said a senior official.

Antony said the CNC would take at least six months to conclude. Then, there will several layers of scrutiny at different levels, ranging from finance to the Cabinet Committee of Security, to vet the deal.

“We do not throw any complaint into the dustbin. There is a parallel inquiry also going on to inquire into the MP’s complaint. If we are satisfied that there is no foul play, then only will we go forward…We will proceed only if everything is clear,” he said.