Bharat Karnad | 26th Apr 2013 – Deccan Chronicle
The Indian Air Force has been clever over the years in a petty sort of way. Short-range or medium-range combat aircraft and so on are uniquely IAF nomenclature; no other Air Force has such categories. In the age of aerial tankers, describing warplanes by their radii of action is a distraction.
Forty years ago the IAF invented another category of warplanes — “deep penetration and strike aircraft”, which permitted the purchase of Jaguar. The IAF sees this sort of thing as a harmless ruse to serve its interest.
The multiplicity of combat aircraft thus procured allows, the service believes, in a crisis to at least have some squadrons in its fleet not subject to sanctions or the spares-and-servicing tourniquet, which supplier countries in greater or lesser measure always apply, depending on their foreign policy goals and national interests of the moment, and which tool of manipulation is now legitimated by the recent Arms Trade Treaty.
This policy of buying aircraft from diverse sources was first articulated in a 2006 note from Air Headquarters (AHQ) to the ministry of defence (MoD), which stated that the requirement for a sub-30-ton fully loaded combat aircraft was being deliberately proposed to escape the Russian stranglehold, and avoid going in for more Sukhoi-30 MKIs or the upgraded variant the “Super” Sukhois. Thus, Rafale passed the spurious test, clocking in at 27 tons. Of course, the IAF-invented range-dictated categories serve another purpose. They confuse generalist civil servants in the MoD and convincing clueless politicians that there are big gaps in combat aircraft numbers which need filling.
In this game of “fool you, fool me”, where the IAF is being jerked around by supplier countries, the threat to national security stays unaddressed. IAF is principally to blame, of course. But the inability of the Aeronautical Development Agency (ADA) and other Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) units tasked with aircraft and on-board systems designs, and the sheer incompetence of Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd (HAL) are equally responsible.
So criminally negligent has HAL been that in all the years it assembled a variety of MiG-21s, MiG-27s, MiG-29s, and the Jaguar, and the power plants for each of these aircraft at its Koraput factory, it failed to maintain a database. In other words, for all the licence manufacturing it has done over the years, by failing to compile how every component in the aircraft and in the engines does what and how, it has learnt nothing.
Had HAL maintained a database of all the items it has put together, the country by now would have had the built-up capability to manufacture the Tejas Mk-I and Mk-II on the run. But this defence public sector unit has reduced itself to an adjunct of supplier companies. That top HAL leadership has not been brought to account on this score and that the Indian taxpayer continues funding such profligacy only reflects the state of things.
DRDO, on its part, has prospered by creating illusion. Other than in certain areas, such as in writing sophisticated software and devising complex algorithms to drive military systems, DRDO projects are mostly scams. Behind every project that’s touted for realising “self-sufficiency” lies imported technology in some guise. In fact, it has been so grossly inept in not insisting on total transfer of technology from its partners that foreign defence firms happily strike deals in which Indian monies fund the development of state-of-the-art technology in other countries but get nothing out of it except finished high-cost products.
It is not the fault of the supplier firms that DRDO has proved so inattentive, gullible, and plain reckless with public monies. Take for example the advanced medium-range and long-range missile systems supposedly being collaboratively developed with Israel. Except in striking a contract for `15,000 crore, DRDO settled for only a work-share arrangement and that too to fabricate the low-value backend of these missile systems, with the Israeli company retaining the intellectual property rights on all the technology so developed.
A similar deal for a short-range missile system with Dassault Aviation has just been signed and another `30,000 crore is consequently going down the drain. Because in this business suckers are not given an even chance, the foreign companies can hardly be blamed for exploiting DRDO’s unwillingness to leverage India’s financial subsidy to obtain full proprietary and production rights for all technologies generated in such projects. So what is the department of defence finance doing other than sleeping on the job?
If DRDO brass were to be hauled up, it would be like pulling out a foundational stone that could bring the whole fraudulent public sector defence industrial edifice that, notwithstanding its claims, has produced no original technology after the Marut HF-24 in the 1970s, tumbling down. It is the reason why the Naresh Chandra Committee’s recommendation that the offices of scientific adviser to defence minister, head of DRDO, and secretary defence R&D be separated, may never get implemented. There are too many vested interests in the armed services, DRDO, and DPSUs who have it good to want this situation to change.
Coming back to Rafale, had Reliance Aerospace gone about it the right way it could have emulated Larsen & Tubro (L&T), which has indigenously developed the engineering, tooling, and manufacturing capability to locally produce everything from nuclear-powered and conventional submarines of any design to artillery systems. This proactive attitude to build up its all-round capability means it is in a position to benefit from “transfer of technology” portions of deals for high-value weapons platforms India has signed in the past two decades, and very quickly to absorb foreign technologies India pays for but which, owing to the complete inability and incompetence of defence public sector units, has to-date not capitalised on. We are talking cumulatively of waste now reaching the thousand billion dollar-level.
If the L&T business model is too onerous, Reliance Aerospace, instead of turning itself into a mere cog in the Dassault Aviation machine by channelling payoffs to the right quarters in the ruling party to lubricate the Rafale deal, could have tried to buy off large chunks of the Rafale-maker, Dassault Aviation itself, as the Tatas have done by purchasing the South African company Denel’s entire 155mm/52 calibre Howitzer line. That might have been the second-best strategy to become a commercially viable defence production entity in double-quick time and do right by the country as well.
The writer is a professor at the Centre for Policy Research, New Delhi
Comments
by Air Cmde Raghub… (not verified) on Fri, 2013-04-26 22:43
Zero sum Game.Only history will tell whether DRDO has been zero or hero. Import of even obsolescent BMD would have cost us fortune which DRDO has been able to save. Calling Names.. If IAF has managed to get its magnificent flying machines from diverse sources instead of all from Russia without love-it has been smart move by them for which they need to be lauded? Jaguars & Mirages have served us well as Canberra’s & Hunters did? HAL & ADA. The two are incomparable and class apart. While HAL has hardly picked up any worthwhile aviation technology during its half a century of assembling MiG’s & missiles in its sprawling MiG complexes- ADA has developed fourth generation plus Tejas. Flight testing & overcoming problems during development takes time but rewarding eventually. Successes as Scams? It is much easier to call a success a scam than calling a spade a spade. If DRDO has made use of some imported technology where is the problem? Most of the defence technologies are copied all over the world sans any qualms or copyright compulsions.155×52 or Desi Bofors will be copy work of some technologies. Russian K-13A air to air missile was true copy of the the US Sidewinder-without being a scam. Missiles. The learned author can rest assured that no short, medium or long range missiles can take India for a ride in any missile deal till Dr VK Saraswat is around. A scientist who has successfully lead us to the ICBM regime must have seen some technology benefit in these collaborations.
by MVP (not verified) on Sat, 2013-04-27 17:57
The so called DRDO Scientists are busy playing Golf in the DRDO Phase-II Township Golf Course, Bangalore. Unlike the soldiers, risking their lives in difficult terrains, a majority of these scientists enjoy their entire life (doing very little official work) in splendid townships, utilising CSD facilities, many festival holidays, discussing (obviously during office hours) and buying /investing in plots of land, flats etc. without concern to build good quality weapons at the shortest possible time. They do research(at tax payers expense) without any urgency to complete the tasks with an end result in mind. They should be made accountable for each and every pie of tax payers money. In case of not meeting the deadline, the scientists should be asked to reimburse back to the Govt. of India 50% of the salary drawn.
I introduce myself as a/c technician (Ex- Sgt) MCF trained on AN-32 Canabra ,of MI-8 &MI-17 & 20 years experience in air force as a/c technician. Minimum passing marks in IAF after completing training which is equal to diploma in aeronautics egg. minimum passing marks are 80 percent, then we go to under MCF (maintenance conversion flight -Six month curse) on that particular a/c, minimum passing marks are 6o percent then we go for OJT (three month course) under supervisor. Then in IAF we are authorized to work on a/c, and other so many tech.coureses to clear 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th line service of a/c
Where as in Hal they take fresh ITI, fresh diploma , and Hal do not trained them for such technical a/c training to work on IAF a/c. In Hal maximum technical head are simply deg.or diploma, not in aeronautical egg ,80 to 90 percent in Hal, technician / eggs are unqualified and untrained to work on that particulate IAF a/c, where are they in Hal, I exposed that in Hal Agra,/ All hal divi. more then 90 percent technician / eng. Are UN trained and UN qualified MCF AN-32 / SU 30 / JAGUAR Etc / 3rd and 4th line servicing on How they are doing 1800 hrs servicing of an-32 since year 2000 TIL Date I got all documentary proof against technical corruption in Hal Under RTI act 2005,I am reporting the matter that poor servicing of defense a/c by Hal, since 10 mar.2005 Hal authority / IAF authority / MOD / hon. president of India for that Hal victimized me to raise the voice Against poor service of defense a/c ,no investigation from MOD / president of India till date
More then 1000 fighter a/c of IAF crashed and about 700 pilots killed due to poor mro by untrained unqualified technicians / eng. In halLoss of precious life of pilots of Indian air force and heavy loss of national wealth millions of mioopns to iaf / govt / public money, hal dept. Of defance production, mod is accountable It is not just surprising but shocking that India has lost 1010 fighter aircrafts since 1971-72 in crashes alone – not only are we losing precious lives but also country’s wealth and it is time to get up and raise our voice.
-Hal is hidden enemy of nation / -HAL killed enough pilots of A/C crashed of IAF,
cost beyond imagination / – HAL burring the country’s wealth cannot be
recovered / – So HAL is curse for nation
Fight against curreption In national interst with the
Unbeatable weapon of RTI ACT 2005
HOW TO SAVE OUR IAF &
CAG. REPORT AGAINST HAL, MOD
Loss of 123 a/c of Indian air force /National wealth and precious life of pilots, costing of Rs. 98 millions ,which is public money must be recoverd from department of defence production (HAL) MOD and given to IAF .All damocrates and buricrates(public servents) held responsible and accountable for this loss of Indian air force / Nation / Public Money
AFTER RECOVERY
Indian air force will be one of the Best and strongest Air Force in whole world
Poor servicing of an-32 A/C by untrained / unqualified technicians / eng. at HAL Agra / IN ALL HAL DIVI., Corrupt & Negligent Management, Poor maintenance of IAF A/C, Not quality conscious
Matter of corruption I am reporting since Jan. 2005 to till date
GM hal Kanpur
MD hal Lucknow
Chairman Hal banglore Burocrates / Public servants
Secretary Deptt, of defence production hal
Secretary to the gov. Of India, defence Democrates / Public servants
Defence minister
Hon. President of India
But, so far no action or investigation ordered from deptt. /ministry / hon.president of India After loss of Rs. 98 millions of public
Waiting for more loss
Collection of evidences against HAL MOD and report UNDER RTI ACT 2005
CORRUPTIONS IN HAL EXPOSED UNDER RTI ACT 2005 BY
TAJPAL YADAV,Ex-IAF & RTI ACTIVIST
Poor servicing of an-32 A/C by untrained / unqualified technicians / eng. at HAL Agra / IN ALL HAL DIVI., Corrupt & Negligent Management, Poor maintenance of IAF A/C, Not quality conscious
Sl. No. Curreption exposed under RTI act 2005
1. Age ,experience and education not required for Skilled , Sami skilled Un skilled work
men to work on AN-32 defense a/c 1800 hrs. servicing
2. Unlawful Recruitment of technical (ITI) / fresh fresh diploma holders, diplomaholders
(EXM),Workmen at Hal Agra in year 1998 , 1999, 2002-03 , 2003-04 , 2006-07 ,more
than 80 percent are untrained / unqualified without any course like MCF AN-32 / on job
training , are doing 1800hrs servicing of AN- 32, which is flight safety hazards And Life
of Pilot of IAF on rick.
3. Not only in Hal Agra but in all the divisions of HAL (under corporate office Bangalore,)
maximum technicians & eng. are unqualified and untrained on that particular IAF A/C
for 3rd and 4TH line servicing, repairing, and calibration
4 HAL Managers illegally drawing HRA as well as holding service accommodations
which is Exposed under RTI act 2005 by me now stopped and recovery being raised of
concerned defaulters since year 2000 to 2011 ,No inquiry / investigation and disciplinary
action against them for misusing the government fund and property
]
5. Unlawful Recruitment of none technical. Workmen at Hal Agra in year 2002 ,No Govt
rules ofreservation (GEN. / OBC / SC / ST / EXM )/
6. Education, experience and age of all candidate including Promod Vasist s/o U.N Vasist
and candidate KK Arala s/o dn Sharma At The Time Of Recruitment
7. .Cast certificate of all candidate/ OBC / SC / ST including Amit Malik diploma holder
submitted to board
8 .Employer Pension Scheme (EPS) details of all Ex. IAF at HAL (D) Agra from 2000 to
2005 Money not refunded to those Ex IAF who has not completed 10 years of service
(on discharge / termination / service not extended)
9 NOC not obtained from Zela Sainik Board / DGR with Central Govt. approval by HAL
while Recruitment of diploma holders in the year of 2002 , 2004 ,2006 at HAL (D),
Agra Vacancies not published. In News paper nor invited applicants, (malfunctions)
10 Selected candidate. Manish Mandal fresh diploma holder recruited with false date
of birth and he served one and half years at HAL (D),Agra,No Action
department TakenAgainst , the Manish Mandel
Sl. No. Curreption exposed under RTI act 2005
11 Technical departmental head mr.omprakash at HAL (D), Agra who assessed the
assessment for the year of 2004-05 was untrained and unqualified MCF AN-32
12 All total 85 to 90 ITI / fresh diploma holder EXM to carried out 1800hrs services on an-32
a/c , were maximum untrained and unqualifiedMCF AN-32 ,which is hazardous to flight
safety and life of pilot
13 Curreption exposed under RTI act 2005 in PF
14 Curreption exposed under RTI act 2005 in ESI
15 Curreption exposed under RTI act 2005 in income tex in HAL Agra by EXM
16
17 123 A/C of IAF crashed due to untrained Technicians and eng. , costing Rs 98 millions
which is loss to IAF / Govt / Public money
Matter of corruption
In indian air force technicians &Eng.trained in CTI , E & ITI Banglore minimum 80 percent passing marks AGAIN under gone for MCF on that perticuler A/C at TATRA AF Stn. Barakpur
1. Loss of 123 a/c of Indian air force /National wealth and precious life of pilots, costing of
Rs. 98 millions ,which is public money must be recoverd from depaetment of defance
production (HAL) MOD and given to IAF,which is public money
2. Eng. / technicians not to be permit for MRO(Maintain,Repair ,O/H) defance A/C of indian Army,indian Navy Indian Air Force ,with out –
A.- Deg. In aeronautical Eng. minimum 80 percent passing marks A/C Eng.
B- Diploma In aeronautical Eng minimum 80 percent passing marks for A/C technician
B.- MCF on that perticuler defance A/C from TATRA AF Stn. Barrakpur minimum 60
percent passing marks
C –On job traing minimum 60 percent passing marks
Deg. Diploma In aeronautical Eng, MCF and on job traing then only eng. And technicians are authorised to work on a/c
All divi. In HAL technicians & eng. Not trained in such technical institute like in CTIAF , E & ITI AF Banglore , No minimum percent passing marks, No MCF is required,
Minimum qualification for technicians & eng.in HAL to do MRO of defance A/C is simply ITI, Diploma and EXM
It is exposed under RTI act 2005
So HAL Dept. of deffence production MOD is hazardious for
Air Wothiness, Flight Safity and Defance
Corruptions exposed by me under RTI act 2005
Published in print media
With documantry proof
And so far-
No objection raised From HAL
MOD
SUB:-.A. Recovery of E.P.F dues for Rs.4447040 =00, raised by E.P.F
Commissner ltr ref. NO /3205/SRO/AGRA/Up dt.24-6-13 against HAL Agra /HAL
TAD Kanpur, for erragulerty in EPF (Exposed under RTI act 2005)
B. Recovery of ESI Dues Rs., 3,84761 =00, raised by ESI Commissner.,
Ref no KA /NIRI./21000006000000706 /12 dated 9-10-12 ,against HAL Agra /
HAL TAD Kanpur, for erragulerty in ESI. (Exposed under RTI act 2005)
C. Recovery of income tax Dues Rs.,2500000=00,raised by income tax
Commissner Let. Ref, no—————————————————- dated
—————— ,against EXM HAL Agra / HAL TAD Kanpur, for erragulerty in
income tax. (Exposed under RTI act 2005)
D. Recovery of HRA dues raised by HAL against enclosed listed corrupted and
negligent managers for misusing the govt. fund and property / post and power
Exposed under RTI act 2005)
E. Recovery from HAL of purchasing cost of crashed IAF 123 a/c
due to HAL untrained and unqualified eng./ technicians and negligent / corrupted
management Exposed under RTI act 2005)
F. Recovery from HAL of MRO cost of crashed IAF 123 a/c due to
HAL untrained and unqualified eng./ technicians and negligent / corrupted
Management Exposed under RTI act 2005)
G. Recovery from HAL of purchasing cost of crashed Navy 68
a/C due to HAL untrained and unqualified eng./ technicians and negligent /
corrupted management Exposed under RTI act 2005)
H Recovery from HAL of MRO cost of crashed Navy 68 a/c in last
10 years due to HAL untrained and unqualified eng./ technicians and negligent /
corrupted management
(Exposed under RTI act 2005)
I. Recovery from HAL of Medical / death compensation of IAF pilots /
Indian Navy pilots killed in crashed a/c due to HAL untrained and
unqualified eng./ technicians and negligent / corrupted management
(Exposed under RTI act 2005)
J. Unlawful and illegal Recruitment of technical (ITI) / fresh fresh diploma,
Holders, diploma holders (EXM),Workmen at Hal Agra in year 1998 , 1999,
2002-03 , 2003-04 , 2006-07 Exposed under RTI act 2005)
Sir,
1. A (1 ). Please ref. enclosed above mentioned show cause notice ref.ltr NO /3205/SRO/AGRA/Up dt.24- 6- 13 issued by V.K Asthana asst E.P.F Commisioner to OIC H.A.L (dett) AF Stn. Agra for recovery of E.P.F dues for RS.4447040 =00 , This irragulatery since year 2000 to till date because of irresponsibility of OIC HAL Agra Mr HS Upadhay ,RC Sharma ,Arunachalam ,Navneet Sharma And HR HAL agra / TAD Kanpur BP Mishra ,JS sandhu, AB Pradhan ,Raju And GM tad kanpur , MD Lucknow under the authority of chairmen Hal Bangalore
(2.) HAL fund is a govt. fund / govt fund is a public money. Loss for RS.4447040 =00 to govt / to public then why HAL , /Govt / public should pay .there for the manager highly paid from govt / public not accountable to their duty must recovery from their salary since year 2000 to till date
( 3) There for it is requested Recovery of E.P.F dues for RS.4447040 =00, raised by E.P.F
Commissner to be deducted from the salary of OIC HAL Agra Mr HS Upadhay ,RC Sharma
,Arunachalam ,Navneet Sharma And HR HAL agra / TAD Kanpur BP Mishra ,JS sandhu, AB
Pradhan ,Raju And GM tad Kanpur , MD Luck now under the authority of chairmen Hal
Bangalore
B (4 )Please ref.enclosed above mentioned show cause notice ref.ltr NO / KA /NIRI./21000006000000706
/12 dated 9-10-12 issued by-ESI Commissioner to OIC H.A.L (dett) AF Stn. Agra for recovery of
ESI Dues for Rs. 3,84761=00,This irragulatery since year 2000 to till date because of irresponsibility
of OIC HAL Agra Mr HS Upadhay ,RC Sharma ,Arunachalam ,Navneet Sharma And HR HAL agra /
TAD Kanpur BP Mishra ,JS sandhu, AB Pradhan ,Raju And GM tad kanpur , MD Lucknow under
the authority of chairmen Hal Bangalore
(5.) HAL fund is a govt. fund / govt fund is a public money. Loss for RS.4447040 =00 to govt / to public
then why HAL , /Govt / public should pay .there for the manager highly paid from govt / public not
accountable to their duty must recovery from their salary since year 2000 to till date
(6) There for it is requested Recovery of E.P.F dues for RS.4447040 =00, raised by E.P.F
Commissner to be deducted from the salary of OIC HAL Agra Mr HS Upadhay ,RC Sharma
,Arunachalam ,Navneet Sharma And HR HAL agra / TAD Kanpur BP Mishra ,JS sandhu, AB
Pradhan ,Raju And GM tad Kanpur , MD Luck now under the authority of chairmen Hal
Bangalore
C.(.7) Please ref.enclosed above mentioned show cause notice ref.ltr NO ————————————-by
income tax Commissioner to OIC H.A.L (dett) AF Stn. Agra for recovery of income tax dues
of Rs.2500000=00 from EXM .this irr ragulerty since year 2006, because of
irresponsibility of OIC HAL Agra Mr HS Upadhay ,RC Sharma ,Arunachalam ,Navneet Sharma
And HR HAL agra / TAD Kanpur BP Mishra ,JS sandhu, AB Pradhan ,Raju And GM tad
Kanpur , MD Lucknow under the authority of chairmen Hal Bangalore
D.( 8) Please ref. enclosed above mentioned ref.ltr NO———————————————– / dt.————-
————- recovery of HRA dues for Rs—————————————-=00 , This irragulatery
since year 2000 because of irresponsibility of OIC HAL Agra Mr HS Upadhay ,RC Sharma
,Arunachalam ,Navneet Sharma And HR HAL agra / TAD Kanpur BP Mishra ,JS sandhu, AB
Pradhan ,Raju And GM tad kanpur , MD Lucknow under the authority of chairmen Hal
Bangalore
E. (9) Please ref. enclosed above mentioned ref.ltr NO———————————————– / dt.————-
————- purchasing cost/ MRO cost of crashed IAF 123 a/c and
Navy 68 a/c in last 10 years due to HAL untrained and unqualified eng./ technicians and
negligent / corrupted management, Recovery of purchasing cost/ MRO cost of
crashed IAF 123 a/c and Navy 68 a/c in last 10 years due to HAL untrained and
unqualified eng./ technicians and negligent / corrupted management for Rs millions of millions ,
since year 2000, because of irresponsibility of All HAL untrained and unqualified eng./ technicians
under the authority of -?
– Chairmen Hal .
– All HAL negligent and corrupted GM , MD ,HR , ED(HR) ,PIO CPIO &AA
Attn- HAL must repay this loss to IAF. Indian Army, Indian Navy. It is public money
F.(10) ) Enclosed please find a list of total crashed IAF A/C and total pilots killed since year 1963 to
2011. . Recovery from HAL of Medical / death compensation of IAF pilots /
Indian Navy pilots killed in crashed a/c due to HAL untrained and unqualified
eng./ technicians and negligent / corrupted management
Attn- HAL must pay Medical / death compensation of IAF pilots /
Indian Navy pilots killed in crashed a/c due to HAL untrained and unqualified
eng./ technicians and negligent / corrupted management
Ref. Serving IAF officer moves court against fighter jets / Hal Flying a MiG-21 amounted to “violation of his fundamental right to life”, a serving wing commander has told the Delhi high court, seeking redressal after a regular flight exercise in 2005 went awry, leaving him with debilitating neck and back pain that has rendered him unfit for flying and even day-to-day tasks.The court on Tuesday directed the Centre to provide a list of MiG-21 crashes that have taken place till date and posted the matter for October 10, 2013 The petition was filed by Sanjeet Singh Kaila, a serving officer in the Indian Air Force, who cited “violation of his fundamental right to life, especially the right to work in a safe environment” under Article 21 of the Constitution.
In his plea, Kaila said he was posted at Air Force Station Nal in Rajasthan as a Squadro Leader in 2005. On January 4 that year, he embarked on a regular flight exercise along with three other pilots. “Immediately after take-off, the petitioner experienced a drift to the left side of the aircraft. Simultaneously, the petitioner was informed by the other pilot flying the aircraft, of a fire at the rear end of his aircraft. Assessing the emergency, the petitioner promptly carried out all the essential directives and got the tyres of the aircraft down for a landing,” the petition said.“The petitioner performed all the aforementioned actions despite the rear of the aircraft being engulfed in thick fire. Despite a near-complete engine/control failure and at grave risk to his own life, the petitioner continued to stay put in an almost uncontrollable aircraft so as to steer it away to safety from a nearby village… To save human life, the petitioner ejected only seconds before the crash of the aircraft.” Kaila said following the incident, he was injured and later forced to discontinue flying after a comprehensive medical examination showed he was suffering from cervicalgia and disc bulges of vertebrae (cervical spine). “The medical report also clearly mentions that the petitioner was rendered unfit for flying duties because of the incident. He was additionally instructed and advised by the doctors to even refrain from performing even day-to-day tasks,” it said.The petition further alleged that a reply to his RTI application revealed that the incident was caused due to a manufacturing defect and poor workmanship at HAL’s facility. Kailaclaimed that despite sending a representation to the government on December 25, 20seeking justice by compensating him for the loss suffered by as a result of the a response was given by the government.The matter was filed before the court in May 2013. On May 22, a bench of justices Geeta Mittal and Deepa Sharma had issued notice to the government and Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL), respondents in the petition, seeking their response. On Tuesday, while HAL appeared through its counsel, no reply was filed by the Centre. Flying a MiG-21 amounted to “violation of his fundamental right to life”, a serving wing commander has told the Delhi high court, seeking redressal after a regular flight exercise in 2005 went awry, leaving him with debilitating neck and back pain that has rendered him unfit for flying and even day-to-day tasks.
The court on Tuesday directed the Centre to provide a list of MiG-21 crashes that have taken place till date and posted the matter for October 10, 2013.
G.(11) Unlawful and illegal Recruitment of technical (ITI) / fresh fresh diploma holders,
diploma holders (EXM),Workmen at Hal Agra in year 1998 , 1999, 2002-03 , 2003-04 , 2006-07,
to be Treated as cancelled and action to be taken against back hander boards because Govt
rules of reservation (GEN. / OBC / SC / ST / EXM ), NOC not obtained from Zela Sainik Board /
DGR with Central Govt. No notification given to any news paper, which is Flight Safety Hazards,
National Security Hazards And Life of Pilot of IAF on risk.
(Exposed under RTI act 2005)
Proof of illegal Recruitment at Hal Agra in year 1998 , 1999, 2002-03 , 2003-04 , 2006-07,
A -Color blind / low vision- Raj Veer Singh – ITI – 1998-99
B.- Color blind / low vision – Mukesh Kumar-Fresh Diploma -2002 -04
C.- Submitted falls DOB certificate Manish Mandle- Fresh Diploma -2002–04
D.- Submitted falls Cast certificate(Kumhar) Amit Malik (Jat)- Fresh Diploma -2002–04
E.-Over age KK Arala Non Tech. 2002—04
Promod Vashit- Non Tech. 2002—04
F.- Submitted falls certificate of OBC Sudhakar(Brahamin) Ex-IAF-2002—04
G.-Medically Unfit RN Pandey Ex-IAF-2006
Recruitment Board overlooked / because Board was back hander
2. Negligent and corrupt HAL management HR, GM, MD, PIO/ CPIO / AA are found most Corrupted
supporting the corruptions misleading,, to Hon President of India Sh. APJ Abdul Kalam ,Smt
Pritibha Patil , Parnav Mukher ji , Secretary to the gov. Of India, defense ,Sec to DDDP (HAL ) MOD
Defance Minister Parnav Mukher j i/ , Sh. AK Antony DM ,Secretary to the gov. Of India, Exposed
under RTIAct 2005 Negligent and corrupt HAL management HR, GM, MD, PIO/ CPIO / AA are found
Involved in Corruptions in PF, ESI, Income Tax Etc, Exposed under RTI Act 2005
PRAYER
There for It is requested for an in-depth investigation /Action against OIC HAL Agra Mr HS Upadhay ,RC Sharma ,Arunachalam ,Navneet Sharma And HR HAL agra / TAD Kanpur BP Mishra ,JS sandhu, AB Pradhan ,Raju And GM tad Kanpur , GM HAL O/H Divi. Banglore Complax , MD Luck now under the authority of chairmen Hal Bangalore for above mentioned Corruptions exposed under RTI act 2005,
Encl
1. A (1 ). Please ref. enclosed above mentioned show cause notice ref.ltr NO /3205/SRO/AGRA/Up dt.24- 6- 13 issued by V.K Asthana asst E.P.F Commisioner to OIC H.A.L (dett) AF Stn. Agra for recovery of E.P.F dues for RS.4447040 =00 , This irragulatery since year 2000 to till date because of irresponsibility of OIC HAL Agra Mr HS Upadhay ,RC Sharma ,Arunachalam ,Navneet Sharma And HR HAL agra / TAD Kanpur BP Mishra ,JS sandhu, AB Pradhan ,Raju And GM tad kanpur , MD Lucknow under the authority of chairmen Hal Bangalore
(2.) HAL fund is a govt. fund / govt fund is a public money. Loss for RS.4447040 =00 to govt / to public then why HAL , /Govt / public should pay .there for the manager highly paid from govt / public not accountable to their duty must recovery from their salary since year 2000 to till date
( 3) There for it is requested Recovery of E.P.F dues for RS.4447040 =00, raised by E.P.F
Commissner to be deducted from the salary of OIC HAL Agra Mr HS Upadhay ,RC Sharma
,Arunachalam ,Navneet Sharma And HR HAL agra / TAD Kanpur BP Mishra ,JS sandhu, AB
Pradhan ,Raju And GM tad Kanpur , MD Luck now under the authority of chairmen Hal
Bangalore
B (4 )Please ref.enclosed above mentioned show cause notice ref.ltr NO / KA /NIRI./21000006000000706
/12 dated 9-10-12 issued by-ESI Commissioner to OIC H.A.L (dett) AF Stn. Agra for recovery of
ESI Dues for Rs. 3,84761=00,This irragulatery since year 2000 to till date because of irresponsibility
of OIC HAL Agra Mr HS Upadhay ,RC Sharma ,Arunachalam ,Navneet Sharma And HR HAL agra /
TAD Kanpur BP Mishra ,JS sandhu, AB Pradhan ,Raju And GM tad kanpur , MD Lucknow under
the authority of chairmen Hal Bangalore
(5.) HAL fund is a govt. fund / govt fund is a public money. Loss for RS.4447040 =00 to govt / to public
then why HAL , /Govt / public should pay .there for the manager highly paid from govt / public not
accountable to their duty must recovery from their salary since year 2000 to till date
(6) There for it is requested Recovery of E.P.F dues for RS.4447040 =00, raised by E.P.F
Commissner to be deducted from the salary of OIC HAL Agra Mr HS Upadhay ,RC Sharma
,Arunachalam ,Navneet Sharma And HR HAL agra / TAD Kanpur BP Mishra ,JS sandhu, AB
Pradhan ,Raju And GM tad Kanpur , MD Luck now under the authority of chairmen Hal
Bangalore
C.(.7) Please ref.enclosed above mentioned show cause notice ref.ltr NO ————————————-by
income tax Commissioner to OIC H.A.L (dett) AF Stn. Agra for recovery of income tax dues
of Rs.2500000=00 from EXM .this irr ragulerty since year 2006, because of
irresponsibility of OIC HAL Agra Mr HS Upadhay ,RC Sharma ,Arunachalam ,Navneet Sharma
And HR HAL agra / TAD Kanpur BP Mishra ,JS sandhu, AB Pradhan ,Raju And GM tad
Kanpur , MD Lucknow under the authority of chairmen Hal Bangalore
D.( 8) Please ref. enclosed above mentioned ref.ltr NO———————————————– / dt.————-
————- recovery of HRA dues for Rs—————————————-=00 , This irragulatery
since year 2000 because of irresponsibility of OIC HAL Agra Mr HS Upadhay ,RC Sharma
,Arunachalam ,Navneet Sharma And HR HAL agra / TAD Kanpur BP Mishra ,JS sandhu, AB
Pradhan ,Raju And GM tad kanpur , MD Lucknow under the authority of chairmen Hal
Bangalore
. (9) Please ref. enclosed above mentioned ref.ltr NO———————————————– / dt.————-
————- purchasing cost/ MRO cost of crashed IAF 123 a/c and
Navy 68 a/c in last 10 years due to HAL untrained and unqualified eng./ technicians and
negligent / corrupted management, Recovery of purchasing cost/ MRO cost of
crashed IAF 123 a/c and Navy 68 a/c in last 10 years due to HAL untrained and
unqualified eng./ technicians and negligent / corrupted management for Rs millions of millions ,
since year 2000, because of irresponsibility of All HAL untrained and unqualified eng./ technicians
under the authority of -?
– Chairmen Hal .
– All HAL negligent and corrupted GM , MD ,HR , ED(HR) ,PIO CPIO &AA
Attn- HAL must repay this loss to IAF. Indian Army, Indian Navy. It is public money
F.(10) ) Enclosed please find a list of total crashed IAF A/C and total pilots killed since year 1963 to
2011. . Recovery from HAL of Medical / death compensation of IAF pilots /
Indian Navy pilots killed in crashed a/c due to HAL untrained and unqualified
eng./ technicians and negligent / corrupted management
Attn- HAL must pay Medical / death compensation of IAF pilots /
Indian Navy pilots killed in crashed a/c due to HAL untrained and unqualified
eng./ technicians and negligent / corrupted management
regular flight exercise in 2005 went awry, leaving him with debilitating neck and back pain that has rendered him unfit for flying and even day-to-day tasks.The court on Tuesday directed the Centre to provide a list of MiG-21 crashes that have taken place till date and posted the matter for October 10, 2013 The petition was filed by Sanjeet Singh Kaila, a serving officer in the Indian Air Force, who cited “violation of his fundamental right to life, especially the right to work in a safe environment” under Article 21 of the Constitution.
In his plea, Kaila said he was posted at Air Force Station Nal in Rajasthan as a Squadro Leader in 2005. On January 4 that year, he embarked on a regular flight exercise along with three other pilots. “Immediately after take-off, the petitioner experienced a drift to the left side of the aircraft. Simultaneously, the petitioner was informed by the other pilot flying the aircraft, of a fire at the rear end of his aircraft. Assessing the emergency, the petitioner promptly carried out all the essential directives and got the tyres of the aircraft down for a landing,” the petition said.“The petitioner performed all the aforementioned actions despite the rear of the aircraft being engulfed in thick fire. Despite a near-complete engine/control failure and at grave risk to his own life, the petitioner continued to stay put in an almost uncontrollable aircraft so as to steer it away to safety from a nearby village… To save human life, the petitioner ejected only seconds before the crash of the aircraft.” Kaila said following the incident, he was injured and later forced to discontinue flying after a comprehensive medical examination showed he was suffering from cervicalgia and disc bulges of vertebrae (cervical spine). “The medical report also clearly mentions that the petitioner was rendered unfit for flying duties because of the incident. He was additionally instructed and advised by the doctors to even refrain from performing even day-to-day tasks,” it said.The petition further alleged that a reply to his RTI application revealed that the incident was caused due to a manufacturing defect and poor workmanship at HAL’s facility. Kailaclaimed that despite sending a representation to the government on December 25, 20seeking justice by compensating him for the loss suffered by as a result of the a response was given by the government.The matter was filed before the court in May 2013. On May 22, a bench of justices Geeta Mittal and Deepa Sharma had issued notice to the government and Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL), respondents in the petition, seeking their response. On Tuesday, while HAL appeared through its counsel, no reply was filed by the Centre. Flying a MiG-21 amounted to “violation of his fundamental right to life”, a serving wing commander has told the Delhi high court, seeking redressal after a regular flight exercise in 2005 went awry, leaving him with debilitating neck and back pain that has rendered him unfit for flying and even day-to-day tasks.
The court on Tuesday directed the Centre to provide a list of MiG-21 crashes that have taken place till date and posted the matter for October 10, 2013.
) Unlawful and illegal Recruitment of technical (ITI) / fresh fresh diploma holders,
diploma holders (EXM),Workmen at Hal Agra in year 1998 , 1999, 2002-03 , 2003-04 , 2006-07,
to be Treated as cancelled and action to be taken against back hander boards because Govt
rules of reservation (GEN. / OBC / SC / ST / EXM ), NOC not obtained from Zela Sainik Board /
DGR with Central Govt. No notification given to any news paper, which is Flight Safety Hazards,
National Security Hazards And Life of Pilot of IAF on risk.
(Exposed under RTI act 2005)
Proof of illegal Recruitment at Hal Agra in year 1998 , 1999, 2002-03 , 2003-04 , 2006-07,
A -Color blind / low vision- Raj Veer Singh – ITI – 1998-99
B.- Color blind / low vision – Mukesh Kumar-Fresh Diploma -2002 -04
C.- Submitted falls DOB certificate Manish Mandle- Fresh Diploma -2002–04
D.- Submitted falls Cast certificate(Kumhar) Amit Malik (Jat)- Fresh Diploma -2002–04
E.-Over age KK Arala Non Tech. 2002—04
Promod Vashit- Non Tech. 2002—04
F.- Submitted falls certificate of OBC Sudhakar(Brahamin) Ex-IAF-2002—04
G.-Medically Unfit RN Pandey Ex-IAF-2006
Recruitment Board overlooked / because Board was back hander
Negligent and corrupt HAL management HR, GM, MD, PIO/ CPIO / AA are found most Corrupted
supporting the corruptions misleading,, to Hon President of India Sh. APJ Abdul Kalam ,Smt
Pritibha Patil , Parnav Mukher ji , Secretary to the gov. Of India, defense ,Sec to DDDP (HAL ) MOD
Defance Minister Parnav Mukher j i/ , Sh. AK Antony DM ,Secretary to the gov. Of India, Exposed
under RTIAct 2005 Negligent and corrupt HAL management HR, GM, MD, PIO/ CPIO / AA are found
Involved in Corruptions in PF, ESI, Income Tax Etc, Exposed under RTI Act 2005
JAI HIND