DRDO violated the Article 309 by implementing interview in promotion of scientist F to scientist G grade without proper amendment in SRO.
NO Assessment interview requirement for Promotion from scientist ‘F’ to Senior scientist ‘G’ as per the DRDO service rule-1979-Rule-8(2)(e) ; but Chairman, Recruitment and Assessment of DRDO forward name before promotion committee after “ INTERACTION ’’ .
What is the meaning of interaction and what is its need against the rule? Nothing except the violation of law for corruption. UPSC conducted examinations for thousands participant for few seats then how RAC chairman want to stop the limited scientists opportunities to appear before the committee directly. Intention of Chairman is very clear.
Then Chairman, RAC Dr. P. S. Goel’s letter RAC/01/Assessment/PSG, dated 22-3-11 introduced this mechanism to give favor to incompetent few DRDO scientists and for this act in return he got Prof. MGK Menon’s chair, RCI, Hyderabad which fed him 84 lakhs per year. It is pure kick back or DRDO should prove the justification of his appointment.
What is this, is it not corruption? Best part of this type of corruption is money which he is receiving is poor tax payer’s money.
Question is, if he was competent authority to amendment of this kind of mechanism than why later DRDO amended this through Government of India gazette notification. He doesn’t have knowledge of the constitution of India, he is not competent authority to amend the DRDS rules which are framed under Article 309 of the constitution of India.
Where is law, where is administration, where is governance, it is happening in every stage in DRTC promotions also, where incompetent fake certificates holders are getting promotions and all relevant benefits, in recruitment of scientists lot of cases are exposed like Arun Kumar’s daughter, Selvamurty’s daughter, A K Bansal’ daughter and now several in queue like Narendra Kumar’s daughter, R B Singh’s son appointment are under lenses
Recently in CEPTAM recruitment drive nearly 5 lakhs applications was received by CEPTAM, they made almost Rs 15 lakhs or more by introducing mandatory SMS registration, pure corruption by CEPTAM management god only knows who is patronizing this kind of corruption in DRDO. The 1 lakh applicant were rejected, and thousands were not appeared due to examination center, CEPTAM did great job candidate who want center in nearby DELHI put him to Goa, Mizoram, Ajmer, Kolkata, Chennai etc.
RTI Request to DRDO
To 9th September 2013 CPIO, DRDO HQRoom No. 314A
DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg
New Delhi – 110105
Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of the following
The amount of expenditure incurred on Internal Screening Committee ( Main ) held for promotion from the grade of Scientist `F` to the grade of Scientist`G`, under the following Heads separatelyfor the Year 2011,2012 and 2013
a) TA/DA on the Chairman and Members of the Internal Screening Committee (Main).
b) TA on the candidates ( Scientist `F`) who have appeared before the Internal Screening Committee ( Main )
c) Miscellaneous Expenditure, i.e. other than above (a) and(b), on the Internal Screening Committee ( Main )
Find the application fee for the request attached with this application. If you feel that above requested information does not pertain to your department then please follow the provisions of Section 6(3) of the RTI Act, 2005/Also as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 please provide the details (Name and Designation) of the first appellate authority w.r.t to your department with the reply to the above request., where I may if required file my first appeal.
I do hereby declare that I am a citizen of India. Kindly provide me with the information at the address mentioned with the application. I request you to ensure that the information is provided before the expiry of the 30 day period after you have received the application.
Note: above required information is directly related to corruption and not come under schedule -II
The requested information is pertain to routine establishment / administrative matter which is not covered under exemption as decided by CIC (refer to CIC decision no CIC/LS/A/2012/002612 dated 22/03/2013).
There was no government approval for conducting ISC, main in assessment year 2011, and it was conducted illegally against the DRDS rules for the benefit to few incompetent scientists of their choice.
“Whoever does anything with the intention of causing wrongful gain to one person or wrongful loss to another is said to do that thing dishonesty”
Regards
PrabhuDandriyal 21-Sunderwal, Raipur, Dehradun -248008 0135-2787750 – 91-9411114879 prabhudoon@gmail.com, www.corruptionindrdo.com
TO 'C' says
Dr.PDD Ji,
you done well job against corrupt & corruption in drdo. mostly DRDO violated the Article 309 , in the promotion of DRTC without SRO TO ‘C’ to TO ‘D’ post drdo corrupt officers take interview of TO ‘C’ TBRL CAT stay on this interview but DRDO Big BOSS deny the CAT order and conduct interview and promote only 10% officer in drdo, Technical Officers only one working hand in DRDO but this policy DRDS officers Harass to DRTC officers who was big contribution in development in all missile project. nonsense drdo promotion policy. Different Rule Different Organization
TO 'C' says
DRDO promotion policy depend on Ex & Retired corrupt Scientist mind, All DRDO depend on the Ex scientist corruption mind without this mind drdo not get promotion, development of missiles and rockets for nation. One Police get 100 rupee brief but DRDO Scientist more than 1????????? it is the level of big corruption & what is image of DRDO scientist only corrupt. What think of other country against India. Who many missile develop by DRDO & Who many missile stock in DRDO? Only Zero.00000000 no count.
Braking News says
TWO YEARS RIGOROUS IMPRISONMENT TO THEN DEFENCE ESTATE OFFICER OF PUNE IN A BRIBERY CASE
Press Release
New Delhi , 13.09.2013
The Special Judge, Pune has convicted Sh. N.Srinivasa Reddy, the then Defence Estate Officer, Pune and sentenced him to undergo two years Rigorous Imprisonment with fine of Rs.25000/- for demanding & accepting a bribe of Rs. 50,000/- from the Complainant.
This case was registered on 06.10.2009 on a complaint wherein it was alleged that Sh.N.S.Reddy while working as Defence Estate Officer had demanded a bribe of Rs.50,000/- from the complainant for recording/adding the name of his son in the Property card of two Bungalows at Castilno Road, Pune, as per the will of Complainant’s Mother. CBI laid a trap and caught Sh.N.S.Reddy, while demanding & accepting bribe of Rs.50000/- on 09.10.2009 from the Complainant.
The Trial Court found the accused guilty and convicted him.