Delhi – 110007 | Corruption In DRDO

To Date – 15^th October 2014

Prof. Dinesh Singh,

Vice-Chancellor,

Delhi University,

Delhi -110007

Subject: Request for inquiry of fake experience certificate issued from Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Center for Biomedical Research North Campus, Delhi University.

Reference: RTI reply received from CPIO, DU vide letter No Info/ OA/ 1761/ 2014/ 5294 Dated 30^th September 2014

Sir,

Delhi University since its inception is guiding source for all other Indian universities due to its proximity with education ministry, UGC and power center at Delhi.

With passage of time, however, it has been noticed that casual attitude has been taken over and faculties are involve in recruitments in various government organizations as a expert and “very early they have adopted a culture of one man scratch another man back”

The opportunity give Delhi University for collaborating the science and technology with various labs have been diluted when some faculties shows leniency in performing the business which has lowered the image of DU.

One such example of this casual attitude has been surfaced when one senior scientist with ten years service annulled on last Friday 10^th October 2014 as the appointment found manipulated and the DU environment biology faculty was participated as a expert for interview of Biotechnology scientist recruitment in RAC, DRDO.

It is astonishing fact that how DU administration allowed environment biology faculty to play role as expert for Biotechnology scientist recruitment and bunch of brilliant biotechnology candidate he selected environmental biology candidate. Basically he was instrumental for the said task but we all believe that no professor will help the corrupt official because rest candidates are also their students.

Another case observed of issuing experience certificate to Mrs S Geetha by Prof. Vani Brahmachari, ACBR. Earlier RTI reply by CPIO, DU clearly send that all six faculties specifically denied that Mrs S Geetha never work in any research project at ACBR including the signatory Prof. Vani Brahmachari.

Recent above reference RTI reply the information given by Prof K Natrajan, Offg, Director, ACBR vide letter no ACBR/14/843 dated 29/30 September 2014 stated that the issued certificate is genuine without furnishing any evidence financial/report/application/ appointment letter etc of Mrs S Geetha which can justify that Mrs S Geetha worked as research assistant for 38 days at ACBR.

It seems Prof K Natrajan, Offg, Director, ACBR not serious about the image of DU and trying to mislead the authorities of HRD ministries. He also not aware the Sh A K Antony already given approval for CBI inquiry on 29^th October 2013 reference Notes at 48-55 ante and the observation of JS & CVO at note 56 ante (few pages is enclosed herewith for ready reference)

It is requested for the sake of DU image and for sake of eligible students who study hard to get good job and wish to serve nation but the nexus of corrupts ruins their honest wish, therefore, an authoritative investigation required for the matter pertaining to Mrs S Geetha. It will further stop the casual attitude of faculties and directors of Delhi University to play with future of genuine scholars.

Regards

Prabhu Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun -248008
0135- 2787750, 9411114879,
prabhudoon@gmail.com www.corruptionindrdo.com

Enclosed.

Experience Certificate issued by Prof Vani Brahmachari.
Assistant Registrar, Delhi university internal circular
RTI reply CPIO, Delhi university
CVO, MOD noting few relevant pages

noting1 — **CVO, MOD Noting DRDO on recruitment complaint Page 1**

CVO, MOD Noting DRDO on recruitment complaint page 12

CVO, MOD Noting DRDO on recruitment complaint page 13

CVO, MOD Noting DRDO on recruitment complaint page 26

To 15^th October2014

Ms Meenakshi Sahay,

Assistant Registrar (College –T) & CPIO,

University of Delhi, Delhi – 110007

Hello,

Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005 in respect of Original Application (OA) No. 1761 of 2014 under RTI Act 2005. Your reply No.Info/OA/1761/2014/5294 dated 30^th September 2014 received on 13^th October 2014 as per Postal department the letter dispatched on 9^th October 2014. The reply enclosed a letter of Offg. Director, ACBAR in which the information given as below

“ The experience certificate dated 2^nd December 2003 issued by the Director, ACBR to Mrs S Geetha clearly indicates that Mrs S Geetha worked for 38 days at ACBR as Research Assistant. Several short term Research/Teaching Assistants are engaged in the center for various academic activities. Prof. Vani Brahmachari was the Director (Offg) of during 2003 who is also competent authority to issue such certificate to bonafide short terms candidate. The experience certificate dated 2^nd December 2003 clearly shows that it was signed by Prof. Vani Brahmachari in her capacity as Director, ACBR although Mrs S Geetha did not work in any of her research project directly which is reflected in the Note sheet dated 9^th January 2013 internally circulated among the teachers of the ACBR after gap of ten years from the date of the certificate. Therefore, it is clear that the experience certificate issued by the Director, ACBR is genuine and there is no internal contradiction.”

As per above statement that Prof K Natrajan, Offg, Director, ACBR confirmed that the experience certificate was issued Prof. Vani Brahmchari in the capacity of Offg, Director, ACBR means Mrs S Geetha was worked as research assistant for period of 38 days in ACBR.

Please provide the official order of competent authority for appointed Prof. Vani Bharmchari as offg, Director, ACBR in 2003.
Provide the period in which Prof. Vani Brahmachari worked as offg, Director, ACBR.
As per Note sheet dated 9^th January 2013 all six faculties were denied that Mrs S Geetha had not worked with them, (I have RTI reply from DU is available ) but unfortunately Offg. Director, ACBAR confidently justifying that the issued experience certificate is genuine means Mrs S Geetha worked as research assistant in ACBR. Please provide information with whom Mrs S Geetha worked as research assistant name & designation ,as Prof K Natrajan, Offg, Director, ACBR confirmed the genuineness of experience certificate and must have documentary evidences to prove the authenticity of issued experience certificate.
Please provide the mode of appointment of Mrs S Geetha like if she applied against any advertisement or she was recommended by someone for research assistant.
Provide the application of Mrs S Geetha for the post of research assistant at ACBR
Provide Mrs S Geetha signed any document/ report generated while she worked as research assistant. Hope that as Prof K Natrajan, Offg, Director, ACBR is aware of latest forensic technologies where age of paper/ink can be dated.
The modes of appointment given to research assistant by ACBR.
Mrs S Geetha mentioned in her application submitted to RAC, DRDO that she received Rs 5000/ month during working as research assistant at ACBR, Please provide the financial terms and condition of ACBR for research assistant and total amount paid to Mrs S Geetha for 38 days working as remuneration/ Scholarship/salary etc.

Postal order of Rs 10 13F862053 enclosed

Regards

Prabhu Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun -248008
0135- 2787750, 9411114879,
prabhudoon@gmail.com www.corruptionindrdo.com

Enclosed

Experience Certificate issued by Prof Vani Brahmachari.
Assistant Registrar, Delhi university internal circular
RTI reply CPIO, Delhi university
RTI reply postal track
Mrs S Geetha’s ACBR RA Certificate

Mrs S-Geetha-case-RTI-reply-by-DU

Corruption In DRDO

Tag Archives: Delhi – 110007

Request for inquiry of fake experience certificate issued from Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Center for Biomedical Research North Campus, Delhi University.

RTI- Delhi University – Mrs S Geetha, Scientist, DIPAS, (D/O Dr W Selvamurthy, Ex – CC R&D) DRDO – Experience Certificate

Appeal to clean DRDO of corrupt and anti-national officials