Tag Archives: ACBR

Drdo

SUBMISSION OF THE FACTS OF COLLUSIN OF THE DOP, DRDO HQRS Dr. A.K. SINGH WITH THE ILLEGALLY APPOINTED RELATIVE SCIENTIST OF THE DRDO etc.

6 Comments

To                                                                                                               12th April 2015                 Hon’ble Shri Manohar Parrikar,                                                                                                     Defence Minister,Room No -104,                                                                                                   South Block,New Delhi-110011

SUBJECT:-  SUBMISSION OF THE FACTS OF COLLUSION OF THE                                         DOP, DRDO HQRS Dr. A.K. SINGH WITH THE ILLEGALLY                               APPOINTED RELATIVE SCIENTIST OF THE DRDO   etc.

Sir,

  1. DOP, Dr. A.K. Singh did not take timely action on the letters of cvc and cvo of mod on the illegal Appointments of blood relatives of senior scientist of DRDO as scientists namely SMT. T chandrabanu, Ms Swati Sriwastava, Ms Dolly Bansal & SMT. S Geetha to illegally retain them for the period as much as possible. He did not carry out his duty meticulously against illegal appointment of SMT. S Geetha to please his ex-boss Dr.W. Selvamurthy.
  2. He did not take the following actions as expected from him in the capacity of DOP to know the truth of the experience certificate, got issued from Dr.Ambedkar centre for Bio-Medical research of Delhi university (ACBR of DU) by SMT. S Geetha D/O Dr.W. Selvamurthy Ex- CC R&D, HR
  • Has not called for any explanation as yet from SMT. S. Geetha to tell the organization  about the name of the projects & names & designations of the principal investigators of the projects of the ACBR of DU in which she worked during November 1999 to January 2000 and for the same she was issued a experience certificate.
  • Has not called for any explanation as yet from SMT. S. Geetha about the date on which SMT. S. Geetha applied for the post of temporary research assistant in ACBR of DU in 1999.
  • Has not called for any explanation as yet from SMT. S. Geetha about the procedure and mode of selection to the post of temporary research assistant in ACBR of DU in 1999
  • Did not produce the original copy of the experienced issued to SMT. S Geetha by officiating Director Dr.Veena Brahamchari of ACBR of DU to the high power committee of Shri Bhujanga Rao & Shri Anup Malhotra set up on the orders of defence minister in  which DOP was himself a member.
  • Did not call for any explanation as yet from SMT. S. Geetha, SC-D of DIPAS, Delhi to know all the facts for issuance of the experience certificate to her by ACBR of DU.
  1. Has been instrumental in sending delayed & distorted replies to the CBI since 01-10-2012 (the date from which he is holding the charge of DOP) in respect of the ongoing through inquiry  against 04 illegal appointed relatives of the senior scientist of DRDO i.e. against SMT. T  Chandrabanu, Swati Sriwastava, Dolly Bansal & SMT. S Geetha.
  2. Has been instrumental in transferring DRDS Cadre Scientists by pick & choose rule without following any uniform policy.
  3. Has harassing the husband-wife scientists by not posting them at a convenient place violating the GOVT. policy.
  4. Has been adopting dilatory tactics to harass the employees of DRDO (who submit genuine grievances on service matters to DRDO HQ to obtain justice through administrative channel) by    unnecessarily seeking opinions of the nodal departments even in the matters where the rule position is expressively clear.
  5. Remains dormant in redressing the genuine grievances & acts super actively to help the dishonest employees & officers of the DRDO which shows his possession of doubtful integrity.
  6. Appointed retired officers of AFHQ Cadre, DRDS Cadre, service officers & DRDS Cadre officers as consultants during his tenure as DOP for the regular jobs for which either replacement have joined in DRDO or for the jobs for which no such appointments is permissible under concerned. He even allowed continuation of the tenure of such illegally appointed consultants.
  7. Has been implementing the special pay to the scientist ‘G’ & counting of the special pay in the fixation of Scientist ‘H’ & tapering of the variable increments of the Scientists by violating  the concerned express rules of DOP&T & ministry of Finance.
  8. Has omitted his duty as DOP with regard to misconducts of Shri A.K. Maini retired Director of LASTEC to save him from vigilance action.
  9. Dr A K Singh deliberately delayed in processing the case of misconduct prima facie against Dr A K Tyagi, Sc ‘G’ so he could get promotion to the post of Sc ‘G’ before issuance of formal charge sheet. He did not propose his suspension of Dr.A K Tyagi even when charges of corruption were forwarded by CVC for investigation to DRDO through CVO, MoD

It is requested that do needful in this with above all reference to save the DRDO.

Regards

Prabhu Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur,Dehradun -248008                                                                                 Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,                                                                                 e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website www.corruptionindrdo.com

Drdo

Request for inquiry of fake experience certificate issued from Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Center for Biomedical Research North Campus, Delhi University.

Leave a comment
To                                                                                                  Date – 15th October 2014
Prof. Dinesh Singh,
Vice-Chancellor,
Delhi University,
Delhi -110007

 

Subject:     Request for inquiry of fake experience certificate issued from Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Center for Biomedical Research North Campus, Delhi University.

Reference: RTI reply received from CPIO, DU vide letter No Info/ OA/ 1761/ 2014/ 5294 Dated 30th September 2014

Sir,

Delhi University since its inception is guiding source for all other Indian universities due to its proximity with education ministry, UGC and power center at Delhi.

With passage of time, however, it has been noticed that casual attitude has been taken over and faculties are involve in recruitments in various government organizations as a expert and “very early they have adopted a culture of one man scratch another man back”

The opportunity give Delhi University for collaborating the science and technology with various labs have been diluted when some faculties shows leniency in performing the business which has lowered the image of DU.

One such example of this casual attitude has been surfaced when one senior scientist with ten years service annulled on last Friday 10th October 2014 as the appointment found manipulated and the DU environment biology faculty was participated as a expert for interview of Biotechnology scientist recruitment in RAC, DRDO.

It is astonishing fact that how DU administration allowed environment biology faculty to play role as expert for Biotechnology scientist recruitment and bunch of brilliant biotechnology candidate he selected environmental biology candidate. Basically he was instrumental for the said task but we all believe that no professor will help the corrupt official because rest candidates are also their students.

Another case observed of issuing experience certificate to Mrs S Geetha by Prof. Vani Brahmachari, ACBR. Earlier RTI reply by CPIO, DU clearly send that all six faculties specifically denied that Mrs S Geetha never work in any research project at ACBR including the signatory Prof. Vani Brahmachari.

Recent above reference RTI reply the information given by Prof K Natrajan, Offg, Director, ACBR vide letter no ACBR/14/843 dated 29/30 September 2014 stated that the issued certificate is genuine without furnishing any evidence financial/report/application/ appointment letter etc of Mrs S Geetha which can justify that Mrs S Geetha worked as research assistant for 38 days at ACBR.

It seems Prof K Natrajan, Offg, Director, ACBR not serious about the image of DU and trying to mislead the authorities of HRD ministries. He also not aware the Sh A K Antony already given approval for CBI inquiry on 29th October 2013 reference Notes at 48-55 ante and the observation of JS & CVO at note 56 ante (few pages is enclosed herewith for ready reference)

It is requested for the sake of DU image and for sake of eligible students who study hard to get good job and wish to serve nation but the nexus of corrupts ruins their honest wish, therefore, an authoritative investigation required for the matter pertaining to Mrs S Geetha. It will further stop the casual attitude of faculties and directors of Delhi University to play with future of genuine scholars.

Regards

Prabhu Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun -248008
0135- 2787750, 9411114879,
prabhudoon@gmail.com www.corruptionindrdo.com    

Enclosed.

  1. Experience Certificate issued    by Prof Vani Brahmachari.
  2. Assistant Registrar, Delhi university internal circular 
  3. RTI reply  CPIO,   Delhi university  
  4. CVO, MOD noting few relevant pages  
noting1
CVO, MOD Noting DRDO on recruitment complaint Page 1

   

CVO, MOD Noting DRDO on recruitment complaint page 12
CVO, MOD Noting DRDO on recruitment complaint page 12
CVO, MOD Noting DRDO on recruitment complaint page 13
CVO, MOD Noting DRDO on recruitment complaint page 13
CVO, MOD Noting DRDO on recruitment complaint page 26
CVO, MOD Noting DRDO on recruitment complaint page 26

                     

Drdo

RTI- Delhi University – Mrs S Geetha, Scientist, DIPAS, (D/O Dr W Selvamurthy, Ex – CC R&D) DRDO – Experience Certificate

Leave a comment
 
To                                                                                                     15th October2014
 Ms Meenakshi Sahay,
Assistant Registrar (College –T) & CPIO,
University of Delhi, Delhi – 110007

Hello,

Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005 in respect of Original Application (OA) No. 1761 of 2014 under RTI Act 2005. Your reply No.Info/OA/1761/2014/5294 dated 30th September 2014 received on 13th October 2014 as per Postal department the letter dispatched on 9th October 2014. The reply enclosed a letter of Offg. Director, ACBAR in which the information given as below

“ The experience certificate dated 2nd December 2003 issued by the Director, ACBR to Mrs S Geetha clearly indicates that Mrs  S Geetha worked for 38 days at ACBR as Research Assistant. Several short term Research/Teaching Assistants are engaged in the center for various academic activities. Prof. Vani Brahmachari was the Director (Offg) of during 2003 who is also competent authority to issue such certificate to bonafide short terms candidate. The experience certificate dated 2nd December 2003 clearly shows that it was signed by Prof. Vani Brahmachari in her capacity as Director, ACBR although Mrs S Geetha did not work in any of her research project directly which is reflected in the Note sheet dated 9th January 2013 internally circulated among the teachers of the ACBR after gap of ten years from the date of the certificate. Therefore, it is clear that the experience certificate issued by the Director, ACBR is genuine and there is no internal contradiction.”

As per above statement that Prof K Natrajan, Offg, Director, ACBR confirmed that the experience certificate was issued Prof. Vani Brahmchari in the capacity of Offg, Director, ACBR means Mrs  S Geetha was worked as research assistant for period of 38 days in ACBR.

  1. Please provide the official order of competent authority for appointed Prof. Vani Bharmchari as offg, Director, ACBR in 2003.
  2. Provide the period in which Prof. Vani Brahmachari worked as offg, Director, ACBR.
  3. As per Note sheet dated 9th January 2013 all six faculties were denied that Mrs  S Geetha had not worked with them, (I have RTI reply from DU is available ) but unfortunately Offg. Director, ACBAR confidently justifying that the issued experience certificate is genuine means Mrs  S Geetha worked as research assistant in ACBR. Please provide information with whom Mrs  S Geetha worked as research assistant name & designation ,as Prof K Natrajan, Offg, Director, ACBR confirmed the genuineness of experience certificate and must have documentary evidences to prove the authenticity of issued experience certificate.
  4. Please provide the mode of appointment of Mrs  S Geetha like if she applied against any advertisement or she was recommended by someone for research assistant.
  5. Provide the application of Mrs  S Geetha for the post of research assistant at ACBR
  6. Provide Mrs  S Geetha signed any document/ report generated while she worked as research assistant. Hope that as Prof K Natrajan, Offg, Director, ACBR is aware of latest forensic technologies where age of paper/ink can be dated.
  7. The modes of appointment given to research assistant by ACBR.
  8. Mrs  S Geetha mentioned in her application submitted to RAC, DRDO that she received Rs 5000/ month during working as research assistant at ACBR, Please provide the financial terms and condition of ACBR for research assistant and total amount paid to Mrs  S Geetha for 38 days working as remuneration/ Scholarship/salary etc.

Postal order of Rs 10 13F862053 enclosed

Regards

Prabhu Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun -248008
0135- 2787750, 9411114879,
prabhudoon@gmail.com www.corruptionindrdo.com             

 

Enclosed

  1. Experience Certificate issued  by Prof Vani Brahmachari.
  2. Assistant Registrar, Delhi university internal circular
  3.  RTI reply  CPIO,   Delhi university  
  4. RTI reply postal track     
    Mrs S Geetha's ACBR RA Certificate
    Mrs S Geetha’s ACBR RA Certificate
    Mrs S-Geetha-case-RTI-reply-by-DU
    Mrs S-Geetha-case-RTI-reply-by-DU

    geetha case rti reply

    geetha case rti reply1