following inputs received from friends of DRDO who believes that DRDO should get rid from nepotism, corruption and favoritism. Regarding nepotism the two cases giving us hope so rest will also see their respective fate.
Regarding corruption Honorable Narendra Bhai is with us and DRDO will also get rid with corruption.
But unfortunately the third one favoritism roots are very deepen in DRDO this because of DRDS/DRTC promotion policy, so please give your support to uproot the favoritism factor from DRDO the chaploosi business should expose properly so chaploose not able to show their faces in front of their children and wife. tag them chaploos “B”, chaploose “C” ……. Chaploos ‘G’, Chaploos Director, CCC R&D, DG etc and end of year we will declare chaploos of the year, etc
Wednesday, September 24, 2014 LAND MARK SC JUDGEMENT –Subhash Chander Chabba
The honorable Supreme Court of India deserves kudos for having delivered a landmark judgement in Vijay Shankar Pandey versus Union of India and others wherein it has been authoritatively held that
“The constitution declares that India is a sovereign democratic republic. The requirement of such a republic is that every action of the state is to be informed with reason.State is not a hierarchy of regressively genuflecting coterie of bureaucracy.
The right of judicial remedies for redressal of either personal or public grievances is a constitutional right of the subjects (both citizens and non citizens ) of this country. Employees of State can not become members of a different and inferior class to whom such right is not available.”
Having spearheaded a crusade against corruption while standing in turbid waters of immorality while seving for over three decades in a premier PSU of State of Punjab,I also got two such show cause notices on grounds similar to those in charge sheet of Sh Vijay Shankar Pandey. My reply to these showcause notices was exactly on the lines and principles which have now been enunciated by the honorable Apex Court.I was awarded punishment of ‘warning’ in both the cases.This punishment was too small compared to the risks perceived by me while following this path of catching the bull of corruption by its horns and it did not deter me from following exposing the modern day dacoits who are pinching the pockets of poor masses without letting them have even an air of the naked loot. Conscientious employees amongst the otherwise spoilt lot can be of immense help in stopping this drift. These employees did not raise their voice for fear of adverse reprisals. The judgement of SC will go a long way to take away this imaginary fear factor and embolden them to raise their voice against wrongdoings apparent to them in their immediate surroundings.
To 25th September 2014
Shri P.N. Prasad, Nodal CPIO,
Department of Science & Technology,
Room No. 24, Technology Bhavan,
New Mehrauli Road,
New Delhi – 110016
Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of Project- Fabrication and characterization of substrate for patch antenna by using spinel nano ferrites for high frequency application. The project was sanctioned to Dr Atul Thakur , Shoolini University, Bajhol, Solan-Oachghat-Kumarhatti Highway, Solan, HP. The Sanctioned amount of project is Rs 10 Lakh for the period of 2013 to 2015.
Provide the copy of Project Proposal Application Form for the project – Fabrication and characterization of substrate for patch antenna by using spinel nano ferrites for high frequency application by Dr Atul Thakur Shoolini University, Solan.
Provide the name and designation of DST official who has sanctioned the project to Dr Atul Thakur.
Provide the date of sanction of the project – Fabrication and characterization of substrate for patch antenna by using spinel nano ferrites for high frequency application to Dr Atul Thakur.
Despite the order of CAT, Guwahati and Guwahati High Court order, Dr. Vijay Veer is reluctant to pay the legitimate due SDA to Dr AK Sannigrahi, Sc ‘F’, PXE, Chandipur, DRDO. Till date no payment is made merely to fulfil/satisfy the ego of Dr Vijay Veer.
Dr Vijay Veer thinks himself over the Honorable Court and hence reluctant to pay the due amount. Oh! What a great dictator director of DRDO, challenging the Constitution of India.
It seems that Sh Avinash Chander, DG, DRDO lost his control on DRDO
An official of DEAL, DRDO Sh. Jagdish Kumar, Technical Officer ‘C’ reported to SSP, Dehradun against the crime committed by Sh. R K Agarwal, Scientist ‘H’ Principal Associate Director, (Farzi Designation because as per RTI information there is no such gazette notification), DEAL.
Thanks to RTI Act 2005 which is strong and effective weapon against corrupt officials.
RTI revealed that Sh R C Agarwal fully supported and extended all his official powers to protect his Agarwal bandhu Sh. R K Agarwal, Sc ‘H’
SSP, Dehradun same day i.e. 4/6/2014 sent Sh. Jagdish Kumar, Technical Officer ‘C’ to Thana Raipur for inquiry.
SHO, Raipur Thana assigned the task to Sub Inspector B P Singh on same day i.e. 4/6/2014
Sub Inspector B P Singh did not look into the matter seriously. After many requests he visited DEAL, DRDO campus on 3/7/2014 and met Sh. R K Agarwal in his office, in the company of Sh K Sivakumar, Sc ‘G’, Dr R S Pundir, Sc ’G’, Sh Dilip Kumar, Sc ’F’, Sh Atul Dev, Sc ‘F’, Sh VVS Panwar, TO ‘C’, working as Security officer, Sh Balwant, Senior Security Assistant.
Sub Inspector B P Singh submitted his investigation report with conclusion that matter is not worthy of further inquiry and is not fit for registration of FIR.
As per RTI reply it clearly shows Sub Inspector B P Singh sent his final report on 3/7/2014.
Actual facts
Sub Inspector B P Singh visited DEAL on 7/7/2014 and met Sh. R K Agarwal in the chamber of Sh RC Agarwal and collected few useless, unrelated paper, un-certified papers which he annexed with his final report, he forgot the date of final report i.e. 3/7/2014.
Sub Inspector B P Singh called Sh Jagdish Kumar, applicant on 8/7/2014 at 12.00 hrs and wrote down his statement; again he forgot the date of final report i.e. 3/7/2014.
Per Sub Inspector B P Singh’s report he has not asked any question to Sh R K Agrawal about the allegation made by sh Jagdish Kumar with certified proof of Sh R K Agrawal’s act and deeds, the person who was harassed by Sh R K Agrawal
Sh RC Agarwal managed the show by offering tea to Sub Inspector B P Singh or like as he already authenticated Sh R K Agarwal false claim of showing association in prestigious project ‘NARAD’ for his promotion to Sc H and because of Sh RC Agarwal illegal act of nepotism so many senior deserving scientist not get their due credits,
Sub Inspector B P Singh’s report is false and produced under pressure of Sh RC Agarwal & Sh R K Agarwal but they forgot that truth cannot be hidden by any means.
The CC TV footage and DEAL official’s are witness of Sub Inspector B P Singh’s visit on 7/7/2014, poor Sub Inspector B P Singh does not know the Sh RC Agarwal & Sh R K Agarwal’s capability of manipulation skills, they are fooling the country men for 100 crores project, Sub Inspector is mere insect for these duo.
Andhera Door Hoga,Suraj Niklega – Achhe Din Aayyenge-DMSRDE will be free of Corrupt Director
Dear friends,
Fight against corruption nepotism favouritism and clean the DRDO is the main goal of www.corruptionindrdo.com website and this mission website exposed the DMSRDE’s corruption and corrupt practices of Director Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena. Several RTIs were filed to collect information & disclose the cases of corruption. An atmosphere against corruption was developed in DMSRDE and people came on front.
People of Kanpur along with DMSRDE’s officials witnessed the frustrations of Director Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena via print media where he tried to his best to destroy the reputation with his absurd words like the website involved in anti national activities and DRDO information is leaking to US and intelligence agencies after website and DRDO is not able to close the website because the hosting is from US blab la.
My friend Saxena lost his mind like Dr Arun Kumar did after the exposer, he filed FIR what happened everyone knows in DRDO, so my friends as Lord Krishana said it is matter of number 95,96,97,98 99 …. wait don’t lost the hope, culprit will get his due.
CVC, CVO, MOD all agencies are on the job files are moving, accountability is fixing, After first fact finding committee of Dr S S Negi got his due credits from 1st September onwards he will going to enjoy IRDE, Directorship, now 2nd Fact finding committee of Dr D C Pande, Sc ‘H’ also waiting of his due rewards. The facts are with Sh Avinash Chander, DG, DRDO, if he believes in GOD or Bhartmata then DMSRDE will know otherwise Sh Jaitely Ji and Modi Ji’s is there for further action.
CVC has informed that all complaints have been forwarded to CVO (MOD) for further necessary action. CVC reply is enclosed.
The RTI reply from CPIO, CVO, MOD are enclosed for ready reference.
Sri Avinash Chander not able to protect Dr.Arvind Kumar Saxena from CVC & CVO(MOD) like Dr. VK Saraswat could not save Dr.Arun Kumar (Suspended just before two hours of his superannuation, Dr. AK Tyagi, Sc ‘G’ who was busy to protecting corrupt official of DRDO as
CPIO,DRDO Hqrs charge sheeted for his corrupt practices, Sri SM Veerbhadrapa, Ex Director, DTRL charge sheeted just before retirement for his act of manipulation in appoint procedure of Mrs T Chandra banu, Mrs T Chandra banu, Scientist ‘F’ whose appointment cancelled by DRDO by mere 12 days before her superannuation. The two Ex- DG Dr. VK Saraswat and Sh M Natrajan along with Dr W Selvamurthy are under CBI lense.
I would like to remind of statement of Hon’ble Sri Atal Bihari Bajpayee, Ex- Prime Minister:”Andhera Chattega, Suraj nikalega” and Hon’ble Sri Narendra ModiJi, PM of India – “Achhe Din Aayyenge”.
RTI request to CPIO,CVO, MOD
To 23rd July 2014 Sh. Samir Ranjan Amin U/Secretary & CPIO Room No 340, Office of Director of Vigilance B- Wing Sena Bhawan Rajaji Marg, New Delhi -110105
Hello, Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005 in respect of complaints against Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena, Director, DMSRDE, Kanpur and as per CVC the complaints has been sent to CVO, MOD for further action, with reference No. 1323/2014/Vigilance 9, 3617/2014/Vigilance 9, 5022/2014/Vigilance 9, 13248/2014/Vigilance 9, etc.
1.Please provide the present status of all my complaints received by your office till date from CVC. 2.Please provide the copy of replies received from DRDO by CVO, MOD in respect of my complaints. 3.Please provide the copies of your forwarding letter to DRDO in respect of my all complaints.
A Naik Subedar with Army was today arrested by city police on the charge of sharing information about strategic locations of Army bases and deployment of units with a woman, suspected to be a Pakistani national, through the Internet.
The accused was identified as Patan Kumar Poddar, Naik Subedar of EME Unit at Secunderabad.
Commissioner’s Task Force, in liaison with Army authorities, arrested Poddar acting on a tip-off, Hyderabad Police Commissioner M Mahender Reddy said in a press release.
According to police, Poddar was also involved in a network MARKETINGbusiness for a company named ‘Secured Life’, and had tried to persuade his colleagues in the Army to join his network.
His posting provided him opportunity to target the defence personnel who came into contact with him mainly for train reservations, police said.
Some time ago a woman, apparently a Pakistani national, befriended him through social media, and got him to give her information about Army’s strategic locations and deployment of some defence units, the Commissioner said.
She had shared with him her nude pictures to entice him, according to the investigation officer. “We will check his emails and his social media accounts to verify this,” said the officer.
Poddar spoke with several Army personnel and gathered information about locations of artillery regiments, commands, corps, division headquarters, etc.
Police have registered a case under Official Secrets Act (for espionage) as well as under Prize Chits Money Circulation Banning Act, 1977 (for getting involved in the network MARKETING business) against him. At present he has been lodged in judicial custody.
by – Danendra Jain <dkjain49709@gmail.com>AllBankingSolutions.com
This refers to Mumbai High court judgement pronounced in a case related to Central Bank of India . The Bombay high court has held that its ( bank’s ) recruitment policy, which allows campus recruitment/interview method for appointment of officers against permanent vacancies on regular basis, was illegal and unconstitutional.
Bank management of almost all public sector banks has resorted to campus hiring, not only in scale I but in scale II and scale III too. During last ten years top ranked officers of almost all banks have functioned in an arbitrary manner, recruited persons of their choice, giving favours to kith and kins of high profile persons and denying the talented unemployed youth. Recruitment of persons for some personal gain or to give favour to sons and daughters of known dignitaries has damaged work culture in banks and adversely affected the asset quality of almost all banks.
Top management in public sector banks picked up persons from campus of their choice and in the name of merit they raped those who have been working in the bank for years and decades. Not only in recruitment have they harmed the future of those existing employees who were waiting for promotion to higher cadre and higher scale. There are instances where bank management recruited officer directly in scale III whereas hundreds and thousands of officers eligible for promotion to scale III are denied their rights.
Further due to their arbitrary and unjustified recruitment of officers from campus in scale III or scale II management of bank had to pay double salary or more for the same work which could be and which hitherto has been performed by junior officers and clerks.
Is there anyone who can punish such top ranked officers whose faulty action caused huge lossto the bank??
Why these responsible and top ranked officers should not be personally punished and taken to task so that in near future no one dares violating the rights of existing employees and denying the opportunity to really talented youths.
I am unable to understand why the courts have simply warned the bank to desist from campus hiring in future and why not court thought it necessary to impose penalty of erring top officials.
In response to court verdict against Central bank and its clear warning to bank not to repeat such campus hiring, Government of India should order CBI inquiry into all recruitment which took place during last ten years in public sector banks through campus hiring and whether those officers are really better than already working officers in banks and whether there was any corrupt dealing in such type of recruitment.
Appeal to clean DRDO of corrupt and anti-national officials
