Tag Archives: High Court

Re-examine Puravankara project near DRDO: High Court

February 24, 2014 23:41 IST -THE HINDU

‘Did builder own the land when plan got nod?’

The Karnataka High Court on Monday directed the Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) to re-examine issues related to the construction of a 16-storey apartment complex by Puravankara Projects Ltd. near the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) campus at C.V. Raman Nagar.

The court told the BBMP to look into every complaint by DRDO related to alleged violation of laws in the grant of approval for the building plans in 2007 and 2011 for construction of 660 flats at ‘Purva Seasons’, adjacent to the Centre for Artificial Intelligence and Robotics (CAIR). The BBMP has been specifically directed to re-examine whether Puravankara had the title deed of the land when the plan was sanctioned. The court’s direction to Puravankara not to aerially encroach upon the defence land during construction by using cranes stays.

Setback to DRDO
The court did not entertain the DRDO’s contention that the project would pose a security and safety threat to various defence research wings in the vicinity. However, DRDO can approach the Supreme Court on the issue of keeping the land on which the project is coming up free of construction under Section 3 of the Works of Defence Act, 1903. Pointing out that the DRDO could not produce any material on the safe distance to be maintained from a defence establishment, the court noticed that there are several other high-rise buildings like Bagmane Tech Park and August Park near the DRDO’s research wings.

The court observed that DRDO could not establish how only Puravankara’s project is affecting it.

High Court restrains PTU admissions in distance courses

The Punjab Technical University (PTU) has been restrained by the Delhi High Court from admitting students in its distance education programme courses till IGNOU accords approval on the issue for the current academic year.

A bench of Chief Justice D Murugesan and Justice V K Jain told ”We direct the second respondent university not to admit any student pursuant to the advertisement made on December 3, 2012 without specific approval from respondent No. 6 Distance Education Council of IGNOU.”

The court’s order came on a petition filed by one Tilak Singh, a resident of Delhi, alleging that the University was inviting applications despite the fact that it’s plea for extension for running the distance education programme courses was pending with IGNOU.

“Vide communication dated October 12, 2012, the Distance Education Council (of IGNOU) has also directed the Punjab Technical University not to admit any student till the application for extension/approval of recognition is pending.

“In spite of the above communication, it appears that the University in question has published advertisement…Calling for applications of the students. Now, in our opinion, in the absence of of any recognition or approval, the University cannot make any admission and that too when the it has been specifically told by the Council concerned that the students should not be admitted,” the court said.

The court has asked the PTU and others to file their responses to the petition and fixed the matter for hearing on March 11.

During the hearing, the counsel for Singh said the PTU was playing with the career of lakhs of students and have duped them to the tune of crores of rupees

Helpless India

To                                                                                                       11th September 2011
The Defence Minister
Room No -104, South Block
New Delhi – 110011

Reference: a)  Your letter No 1409-VIP/RM/2011 dated 21st March 2011

                       b)  Your letter No 1409-VIP/RM/2236 dated 20th May 2011

The bomb blast at gate No -5 of High Court, Delhi has once again proved that we are helpless. The government is helpless, Prime Minister is helpless, Home Minister is helpless that is all agencies responsible for protection of common man is helpless. Right hand does not know what left hand is doing.

Through this website I raised many issues of DRDO, Ministry of Defence, Government of India and found that no concrete action has been taken because Defence Minister is also helpless.

Accountability is missing in each and every level in the DRDO machinery. Accountability is missing therefore unaccountable assets are growing in individuals bank accounts and benami properties etc.

In DRDO there is no accountability at all; SA to RM is holding four posts simultaneously like SA to RM, DG (R&D), Secretary DRDO, Program Coordinator / Chairman Brahmos aerospace Private Limited etc. He  is enjoys the unaccountable money with the help of Dr Vasudeva of SPIC and many more means but not accountable to national security. In Kargil like scenario SA may say that I am helpless because my past predecessors have not fixed the track of development and 30000 strong scientific/technical force whom I am leading does not listen to me, no where it has been written that DRDO is responsible to develop concurrent technology useful for national defence or DRDO is not responsible for developing a system which can go for batch production.

DRDO is using simply the word like (a) Mission Mode (b) Technology Development           (c) Science and Technology basic research. These words have been borrowed simply to justify the annual expenditure which is forcefully granted by defence ministry.

I am not accountable and none my director is are accountable, SA’s punch lines which is maintained by in all labs meticulously. This the vision of DRDO labs for accountability, this culture is followed every effort is made

Directors are free to misuse the government funds as they have to match the exorbitant projected funds for a particular year.

How DRDO is helping the wasting the government funds is narrated by Sh S Ravind, PD, LLR, LRDE Bangalore to CVC, New Delhi.

Regards
Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008
Phone – 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
E-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com prabhu@dandriyal.com 
Website – www.corruptionindrdo.com

Enclosed – letter of Sh S Ravind PD,LLR,LRDE Bangalore

letter of Sh S Ravind PD,LLR,LRDE Bangalore
letter of Sh S Ravind PD,LLR,LRDE Bangalore

Appeal to All Retired/Serving Officials of DRDO – Please Provide Inputs & Suggestion for PIL’s

Dear friends

To save our premier organization from clutches of corrupt official it is time to submit PIL’s in honorable Supreme Court/ High Court. The people who retired or serving in DRDO are very well know that how much neck deep corruption, nepotism, favoritism and misuse of funds prevailing in DRDO.

So far DRDO has escaped from the attentions of the various agencies like CAG, CVC, CBI, Income Tax, Custom and Sales Tax etc.  The www.corrutionindrdo.com received lot of information which can attract the above all agencies and in few cases the information also about how DRDO fooling or misleading these agencies.

We have to tell the honorable Court that DRDO senior management is as corrupt as Sh P J Thamos, Ex- CVC, or as Justice Soumitra Sen (first judge impeached by Rajyashabha) and some corrupt as Sh Andimuthu Raja (2G scam fame minister) as Smt Kanimozhi Karunanidhi (2G scam fame member of Parliament) as Sh Suresh Kalmadi ( CWG scam fame member of Parliament)  are now in Tihar Jail.

DRDO established in the year 1958 with a humble beginning to technical support to the defence forces, as an integral part Ministry of Defence along with defence production units. The successive war fought by India such as 1962 with China, 1956 & 1971 with Pakistan and 1999 Kargil war it has been proved that DRDO has not played significant role and exhausted billion of billion  poor tax payers money.

The promised were like bring moon on Earth as programs like IGMDP (Missile Program), MBT (Arjun), SAMYUKTA(Electronic Warfare), LCA(Tejas Aircraft), RADARS, SHIPS, SUBMARINE, Bread, Butter, Jam etc.

Until 1980 DRDO spread from Kanyakumari to Leh and Gujrat to North East. The huge Infrastructure were built (1 Lakh Crores) and high technical man power recruited                 ( 30000) by passing UPSC and aim was to develop import substitute but with the passage of time:-

  1. DRDO forgot all the commitments to the defence forces and instead of strengthen the forces it played role of obstacles for procurement latest technology.
  2. DRDO directors, Hqrs justify their successive failures but consumed 7-8 % of defence budget annually.
  3. The total failures were reviewed by ministry of defence and 439 projects was short closed/ aborted(before time)
  4. Programs which were initiated by 1990 with the promise of deliverable products were failed measurably the poor tax payer’s money which were supposed to play a positive role in country’s defence were mere wasted.
  5. Today we are importing the import substitute latest example like SDR and befooled the countryman.
  6. In the name of SECRECY article’s of 1927 & 1965 seals the corrupt DRDO top brasses and they are siphoning the precious money in the broad day light to their son’s, daughter’s, spouse, relatives and friends bank accounts.
  7. Orders are placed with foreign firms through open / limited tenders but the case is negotiated with these private pocket firms which are related to them. As a result huge DRDO money goes to massage parlour, Cocktails Party’s  and dowry with Mercedes Benz ( Ex Director DIITM, DRDO Hqrs was generously to give Mercedes Benz to his Son In Law)
  8. Fighting against corruption prevailing in DRDO since 2001 have collected enough information and ready to file PIL .  Through website www.corruptionindrdo.com many many honest, patriotic and nationalist people join their hands and supplied lot information about corruption, nepotism to save our DRDO.

I appeal to my brothers and sisters of serving and retired DRDO officials to join hands in support the PIL’s for cleaning the DRDO from corrupt officials and make DRDO a perfect productive organization so our future talented boys and girls not quit from DRDO due to unethical environment.

The proposed PIL will be submitted through Sh Vinay Kumar Mittal, Ex Scientist ‘G’, DRDO and whistle blower of NTRO. The PIL’s will be presented by Sh Prashant Bhushan the noted advocated   Sh Anna’s right hand.

  1. Extension / contracts/ consultancy of corrupt DRDO officials beyond the 60 years of service
  2. Recruitment/ Assessment tool used to encourage corruption/ nepotism/favoritism and kick backs in recruitment and assessments( DRDO RAC activities and the role of RAC chairman)
  3. To fix the accountability. So far nobody is answerable to anybody in DRDO. It has inculcated a culture to encourage bluff and give benefit to bluff masters.
  4. To expose all DRDO serving/ retire top officials having companies which are involving in unethical business directly or indirectly and siphoning the poor tax payer’s money.

Sh Vinay Kumar Mittal, Ex Scientist ‘G’, DRDO has kindly agreed and offered his services to submit PIL’s who already brought the NTRO corruption in the notice of honorable Supreme Court as well as in the notice of common people of India.

Thanking you

Regards
Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008
Phone – 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,

E-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.comprabhu@dandriyal.com                                          Website –  www.corruptionindrdo.com

From   Vinay Kumar Mittal vkm021055@gmail.com
To       prabhu@dandriyal.com
Date    Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 6:48 AM

Subject  Request for information for filing PIL in Delhi High Court against DRDO

Dear Prabhu,

i am an avid reader of your site about what is happening in DRDO.

DRDO of today is not the DRDO of yesteryear’s . There no doubt that there is massive corruption , favoritism , nepotism , misuse of official position and funds in various laboratorieses of DRDO. DRDO Laboratory Director are ‘neo kings’ who are law unto themselves . I remember a Director’s conference in mid 900’s when Dr. Arunachalam was SA and T.N Sheshan was Defence Secretary . He very open  said that  ‘”when you visit a DRDO lab there will be  a long pathway –  you open one gate then second gate and finally a third gate to see the king (Director)  sitting and ruling over his empire. They consider themselves nothing less than kings – the Maharaja with lab staff and scientist as their praja”.

I have personally witnessed all this and deeply saddened

What went wrong with NTRO is this DRDO culture which was imported by DRDO crowd i.e. KVSS Prasad Rao and M.S.Vijayraghavan .This DRDO culture destroyed NTRO. Now Hon’ble Supreme Court taking a very very serious view of happenings in NTRO , things are expected to move in right direction. Based on  the evidence provided by me , I have reasons to believe that some very very senior functioneries will definately be arrested after Hon’ble Supreme Court goes throught CAG and CVC report on NTRO.

I am now filing four more PILs in Supreme Court throught Sh. Prashant Bhushan  to the issue of corruption in NTRO with all the evidnece . This became essentail since there were many issues which could not be covered in my earlier PIL/SLP in the matter related to NTRO.

I have a request to make . Kindly provide me with evidence ( RTI responses, copies of documents if any and details of cases ) about corruption, misuse of official position , favoritism , nepotism in DRDO and I will file PIL in Delhi High Court against DRDO. This is essential since many of you are already working in DRDO and give3n the poor moral character of officials of DRDO , you may not like to take up the issue with you bosses. As far as as I am concerned , i have nothing to loose and worry about – iIhave faced enough threats of liquidation , arrest etc and I have taken this in my stride . When you challenge this corrupt system , this is bound to happen.

Unfortunately DRDO has escaped attention of the agencies/ institutions  because of  general impression that ‘ they are poor scientists only and not Income Tax , Sales Tax or other public dealing departments”. We have to tell the world that DRDO senior management is as corrupt as any other department.

Please do not worry about the cost . This can be worked out separately in an transparent manner.

Please put this appeal on your web site. The documents can be provided either through you or directly to me at following address

Vinay Kumar Mittal
605, Satpura Apartment
Kaushambi,
Ghaziabad 201010
email-vkm021055@gmail.com 
Mobile – +919811333195
Res- 0102-2776171
 

Favoritism, Nepotism and Plagiarism

To                                                                                                                       31st July 2011
The Defence Minister
Room No -104, South Block
New Delhi – 110011

Subject: Favoritism, Nepotism and Plagiarism

Honorable Sir,

Dr P S Goel, Chairman, RAC, DRDO does not deserve this high office. He is a byproduct of favoritism, nepotism and plagiarism.

From his bio-data two things are missing because he has very cleverly written names of those awards which are purely fabricated in ISRO.  Prestigious Shanti  Swaroop Bhatnager Medal  and International publications with volume no, Page no, year of publication and the name of journal he should write if at all he has contributed.

Due to Policy of the government he was made director in one small unit of ISRO Hqrs. His subject expertise is such that he appreciates only the work of CP Technology (Cut Paste Technology) as an example the following paper tells the strong and itself explanatory. Under his able leadership RAC has converted into one of the office where transfer posting, promotions and recruitments are sold.

Honorable High Court’s Judge ,  Justice SR Singh  inquired about plagiarism of then Vice Chancellor  Kumaoun University and result was the immediate resignation of  Vice Chancellor  Prof B S Rajput in 2003.

Raksha Mantri and Scientific Adviser to Raksha Mantri are requested to investigate the enclosed following paper which is the evidence of corrupt practices prevailing in DRDO and take appropriate action against Dr. P S Goel and the plagiarist scientist, withdraw the medal given to her and also remove the paper from DRDO Technology Spectrum May pp 243-246. So that Indian defence forces may get their confidence on DRDO or else the paper will be put up for legal action so that plagiarism nurtured by Dr P S Goel is suitably dealt with.

Thanking you

Regards

Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal 
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008
Tele/Fax –0135- 2787750, Mobile- 09411114879,
E-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com ,  prabhu@dandriyal.com
Website –  www.corruptionindrdo.com

Enclosed Letter from received from RAC employee

 

RAC letter received page 1
RAC letter received page 2
RAC received letter Page 3
Paper Published by Ms Jyoti Bhalla

 

Paper Published by Ms Jyoti Bhalla
Paper Published by Ms Jyoti Bhalla

 

Paper Published by Ms Jyoti Bhalla

 

ACTUAL References from which ditto paragraphs are copied
1. http:/ len.wikipedia.org/
a. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real-timeoperating system
b. http://en.wikipedia.org/wikilHistoryofSymbian
c. http:/ /en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbian
2. http://www.dotcominfoway.com/attachmentsI268 White-paper -on- Mobile-OS-and-efforts­ on-Open-standards. pdf
3. http://www.tolmol.com/bp/mobile-phones/mobile-operating-system-os.htm
4. http://www.scribd.com/doc/35602787 IMobile-Application-Testing
5. http://www.dauniv.ac.in/downloads/Mobilecomputing/MobileCompChap 14L02MobileOS.  llilf (Oxford University Press 2007. All rights reserved)
6. http://www.itbusinessedge.com/topics/show.aspx?t=752
7. http://www.osdata.com/kind/kinds.htm
8. http://symbianresources.com/tutorials/ general I mobileos/MobileOperatingSystems. pdf
9. http://books.google.co.in/books?id=WivXOHmVTIMC&pg=P A31&lpg=P A31&dq=”familia
      r+tasks+such+as+reading+e-mail” &source=bl&ots=q
     (Operating System Principles – By Abraham Silberschatz)
10. http://www.scribd.com/doc/52228167/321CONCLUSION
11. http://wiki.nectec.or.th/gitiwiki/pub/Knowledge/Symbian OS/simbian02.ipg
12. http:/ Itechnox.org/symbian-os/
13. http://www.itu.dk/courses/ISOM/E2005/Nokia and Symbian OS%5Bl%5D.pdf
14. http://www.iavamidlet.comI2008/07 I 121how-to-install-the-nokia-s60-sdk-in-netbeans-for­
      i2me-development.html
15. http://wiki.answers.com/O/What are the advantage of symbian mobile os
16. www.verifysoft.com/de coveritv casestudy symbian.pdf