Tag Archives: Dr P S Goel

Drdo

Open Letter to Sh Avinash Chandra, SA to RM, DG DRDO

10 Comments

Dear

Shri Avinash  Chandra Ji, after you joined as DRDO boss, honest and neutral official expected and hoped for good decision, good administration, good cohesive  environment, hope you will shake DRDO with your full strength  to get rid of incompetent stuff.

But sorry to say you disappointed the honest scientists/ staff/ officials and they are not finding any reason to stay or giving their 100% output to DRDO.

Avinash ji, collect all your good energy and get rid of the nexus of culprits who are controlling SPIC, CCE, Department of Personnel, RTI Cell, RAC, CEPTAM and some Lab heads.

Every DRDO official knows acts and deeds of these corrupt officials but sake of their carrier not coming forward but sending anonymous or fake signed letters ( inputs are correct) to Prime Minister, Defence Minister and other government agencies and of course to you also, I have also received some from various labs. (Sending bunch to Honorable Defence Minister)

The increasing numbers of court cases are also perfect examples of mismanagement in DRDO.

The decision of giving responsibility of administration/material management to scientists is also going to be a big problem in the coming time.

Perfect administration and perfect procurement is not cup of scientists. They are not able to match with laid down rules of government of India. Day by day increasing number of anomalies / audit objections in recruitments / procurement are going to be a big issues.

Dr. P S Goel’s DO letter implementing of interaction for promotion from  Sc ‘ F’ to Sc ‘G’   without approval from cabinet is a clear cut  case of violation of Article 309 and the repercussion now started in shape of court cases which was hampering the progress of DRDO and created demotivation among senior scientists

Same in RAC/ CEPTAM encouraging recruitment of incompetent / fake degree / diploma appointment of such candidates who are not eligible as per SRO/ appointment on the basis of nepotism/ in this respect you only see the RTI’s on these issues, you will find clear picture of the future of DRDO.

You are under the impression that corrupt CPIO, Dr A K Tyagi is protecting DRDO. It is not true, instead of exposing the corrupt practices, he is trying to bury the information and very soon these corrupt practices will sink the DRDO ship. As you aware CVC already issued advice to CVO, MoD against the Dr A K Tyagi for “Regular Disciplinary action is recommended on: 9/9/2013“and you are not taking any action to remove him for the post of CPIO, DRDO. What does it mean, it means still you are in grip of corrupt officials. A honest advice is first change your staff officer and old staff of Dr Sarswat’s time, than only you will be find some change in DRDO’s scenario.

Avinash ji, we all very well know that you are washing dirty linen of Dr V K Sarswat’s several misdeed which are the outcome of mismanagement of Dr Sarswat, because he was only on? Government agencies very well know about that, and why he was not able to get extension,    Ms R. AMRUTHA VANI, SC ‘F’’s  (‘Below the Bench Mark’) case, Dr Neelam Bhalla’s, Sc ‘F’ (Workplace Humiliation, Harassment, Gender discrimination & Victimisation)  case etc. but problem is that you are dealing all issues with same set of officials ( Dr Sarswat’s  & Dr. W Selvamurthy’s gang) who created and responsible for these kinds of hurdles in DRDO for their own wasted interest.

CEPTAM Director enjoys all type of corrupt practices like he is engaging his wife and relatives in different recruitments boards as experts. Recent CEPTAM recruitment process he introduced mandatory SMS registration (cost Rs 3 to each applicant) for his personal benefit (he worked this out this without proper procedure) and due to this almost thousands of aspirant were not able to get their admit cards. In this process lot of SC/ST candidates also suffered, you can check with records, where Government of India facilitates to SC/ST candidates in recruitments without any fee. Almost 5 lakhs candidates applied nearly one lakh rejected and thousands of candidate could not appear due remote centre problem, candidates were not given asked choice centers, they received admit cards with centers like Goa, Mizoram, Chennai, Patna.

Regards

Date 26th September 2013

Prabhu Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur
Dehradun-248008
E-mail – prabhudoon@gmail.com, website- www.corruptionindrdo.com

Please go through the following letters which are self explanatory of your labs environment and administrative ability of your scientist.

Example Responsibility of Administration to Scientist – DMSRDE ION Dated 31st December 2012 a true example of DRDO helpless position – a perfect documentary evidence of how incompetency promoting in DRDO.

DMSRDE ION Dated 31st December 2012
DMSRDE – ION Dated 31st December 2012

dmsrde meeting1

dmsrde meeting2dmsrde meeting3

CEPTAM Recruitment Case – Few examples

  1.  Sh. Kamdev , SC candidate – Admit card not received  reason –  SMS registration
  2.  Sh. Kunal – Admit card received after one day   – 5 times he registered by SMS – Delhi local but centre was Ajmer
  3. Sh Satvir – Applied for post of welder and asked for local nearby centre Delhi but he was given centre Chennai
  4. Mohd Shahbaz – No Admit card received/ SMS registered/ application not found
  5. Sh Saroj Kumar- applied for 0217 Diesel Mech local Harsh Vihar, Delhi based   admit card received with Centre in Patna
  6. Sh Sandeep – applied for Fireman not received admit card – reason not known
  7. Ms Kavita – resident of Delhi, Admit card received given exam in Kanpur centre spend Rs 4000 will Director CEPTAM reimburse  or only busy minting money for himself and his relatives.

Hundreds of candidates wasted their days in front of CEPTAM reception but could not able get their admit cards.

Long list will be continue 

Drdo

Happy Holi, Holi Mubark

4 Comments

To                                                               27th March 2013
The Defence Minister
Room No -104, South Block
New Delhi – 110011

Happy Holi, Holi Mubark to honorable Raksha Mantri Ji,

Happy Holi, Holi Mubark to each and every true Indian who thinks for the country and dreams of self-reliance, secure, healthy and honest India including our defence sector.

In the Holika Dhahan occasion we congratulate and support our honest Defence Minister Sh A.K. Antony for starting swaha of corrupt officials in our defence sector. We are also thankful to him for taking such exemplary action (suspension just half an hour before his retirement after enjoying extension in service for two years) against Dr. Arun Kumar, Ex-DOP, DRDO.

Sir, there are so many other corrupt DRDO senior officials who deserve the same action from your side. These officers exploit DRDO by inducting incompetent family members in different levels, involving procurement businesses as the name of ex- air chief name is accused. If DRDO is investigated, you will find that SPIC, ASL, DRDL, HEMRL, GTRE, TBRL and lots of other DRDO labs are busy in the same manner. We have already shared some information with IB, CBI and other agencies. The family members, relatives and friends of these corrupt DRDO officials are enjoying shares of DRDO funds.

There are many more secrets of incompetent DRDO officers mishandling constitutional valid rules for their wasted interest.

RAC of DRDO established to accelerate the recruitment process of potential scientists. However, unfortunately RAC is losing its utility and working as it is now a tool for corrupt senior DRDO officials to encourage corrupt and incompetent stuff in DRDO and it is also being used for demoralizing the honest and real R&D scientists. The increasing representations and court cases are the live examples of these acts.  We think that by now, you are also fed up by answering a lot of honorable parliament members, who are regularly asking the exodus of DRDO scientists.

Recently, as per sources, in one court case, a scientist accused that the thenRACChairman Dr. P.S. Goel unconstitutionally cleared screening committee’s list. The claim is that the list was not signed by the members. It is not surprising because Dr. P.S. Goel has already violated Article 309 by issuing a letter for modifying the SRO on his own without approval of cabinet vide letter no.RAC/01/Assessment/PSG dated 27, March 2011. This was blindly done to give benefits to some incompetent DRDO officials out of way; in return, Dr. P.S. Goel got DRDO chair which costs nearly Rs. 83 lakhs per year on the poor tax payer.

Dr. R.C. Aggarwal, Director DEAL, DRDO gave unceremonious favor to another Agarwal, a scientist of his lab for the post, outstanding scientist. This outstanding scientist had been claimed that “his main contribution has been the development of NARAD, the first semi-static and transportable terminals developed in the country. These terminals were immediately deployed in SRI LANKA during operation PAWAN where they have played a vital Role.”  We are waiting for RTI reply on this subject from DRDO, but we know personally this claim is totally false and used to make him an outstanding scientist.

Another great job was done by DRDO when DRDO ignored your power delegation orders No 36(3)/ 2009-D(O&M), Govt. of India, Min of Def, dated 1 June 2009 and No 36(3)/2012-D(O&M), Govt. of India, Min of Def, dated 5 Nov 2012. . DRDO took approval to suspension/dismissal of honest officials from RRM and in this respect they also filed affidavit in the honorable courts that they got approval from RRM on the subject matter.

Sir this is the tip of the iceberg and the main reason of the exodus, court cases and unproductiveness of DRDO.

Sir, in the DRDO scenario a lot of evil things are waiting for your Holika Dhahan like

  1. Arun Kumar’s daughter’s illegal appointment.
  2. Selwamurthy’s daughter’s illegal appointment.
  3. T.Chandrabanu’s illegal appointment
  4. Prof S K Salwan’s , illegally given DRDO chair (ignored the age limit)
  5. Vasudev’s illegal stay and involvement in SPIC (the IB already reported his daughter’s involvement)
  6. Dr Prahlada ’s VC, DIAT appointment  (ignored his all corrupt activities including remark for SC candidate)
  7. DLRL security surveillance procurement which was submitted with evidences to you only an eyewash inquiry was done by DRDO officials)
  8. Appointment of Sh Dharmendra Kumar, Scientist ‘B’ helped by Dr Arun Kumar, He was MSc,(2001)  at the time of joining in DRDO as STA (2003)

List is too long and the paper will fall short but we are assured that you will surely swaha some corrupt officials in this holy holi festival.

www.corruptionindrdo.com

Always strongly standing to fight against corruption, nepotism, castism, favoritism prevailing in DRDO

 

 

 

Drdo

RAC, DRDO – Favoritism, Nepotism, Corruption

8 Comments

To                                                                                                                30th August 2011
The Defence Minister
Room No -104, South Block
New Delhi – 110011

Honorable Sir,

Promotion of Sh R K Jain, Director, RAC, I have earlier informed you the neck deep nepotism flourishing in RAC, DRDO after Dr P S Goel took the charge of Chairman, RAC. The  cut paste technology of RAC Chairman has helped Sh R K jain to claim 50 publications without the references of Journals year of publication, Page Nos etc.

It has been confirm by RAC that out of 50 publications claimed by Sh R K Jain, 37 Publications are technical reports and 10 was abstracts presented in symposia /seminars. The ugly part of these publications, Chairman RAC Dr P S Goel recommended Sh R K Jain “Scientist of the Year” award

What is happening in DRDO, Please order an inquiry, enclosed   representation is received by www.corruptionindrdo.com on 29th August 2011

Thanking you

 Regards
 
Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008
Phone – 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
E-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com,  prabhu@dandriyal.com Website – www.corruptionindrdo.com            

Letter received by ordinary post 29th August 2011

To
Dr AK Anthony                                   Dr VK Saraswat
Defence Minister                                 SA to RM
South Block                                         DRDO Bhawan
New Delhi                                            New Delhi

Ref— DRDO News Letter-August 2009— Promotion to Bluff Master in “outstanding” category

Dear Sir(s),

Please notice the Resume of Shri RK Jain, Director RAC for promotion from Sc ‘F’ to Sc ‘G’ in ‘outstanding’ category published in DRDO Newsletter- August 2009 – enclosed

flag A Back ground- not the work in the scale of Sc ‘F

flag B Got promotion for installing CCTV. Is it a scientific work? CCTVs are installed in shops, malls, poles, on roads, airports, railway stations, schools, colleges, private offices, PSUs, banks, ministries, homes, community centers.

Is it a work worth even mentioning?

Installing Videoconferencing- Even non scientific organisations are using this technology. Is it a scientific work? Is it research work?

flag C  “responsible for 50 publications which include 37 technical reports, chapters in 5 b09ks, monographs and published/presented more th_an 10 papers”

The sentence itself is meaningless, Publications do not include technical reports

50 publications include 10 publications/presentations? What does this mean?

How many publications shri Jain has?

How many presentations has he given?

Where has he ever presented any paper?

What are these five books?

With Internet search, not a single publication is visible.

flag D  Misleading- was scientist of the year award in 2006 given for work done 1995? This is not the work done in the scale of Sc ‘F’ and should not have been mentioned at all

­

This indicates that DRDO promotions have nothing to do with work. The higher ups decide whom to promote No matter what is the work of the scientist or wI1at he writes in his resume – without verifying CCs approves it and the committee is asked to pass it.

Does the work worth giving promotion in ‘outstanding’ category.

Was the promotion given to Sh RK Jain, Director RAC for manipulations in recruitments and assessments??

Minister Sir is requested to verify the truth of this resume

Sh RK Jain's Citations
Drdo

DRDO’s Extension Counter- for DRDO’s Top Corrupt Officials

4 Comments
To                                                                                                                    22th August 2011 
The Honorable Prime Minister
PMO, South Block
New Delhi -110011

Subject: Grant of Extension of service of Scientists beyond the age of superannuation

Honorable Sir,                                                                                                                                                                Department of Personnel and Training O M No.26012/8/2011-Estt. (A) Dated the 16th May, 2011 stats that the laid down criteria for extension of service to the scientist should be in term of proviso to

i)        FR 56 (d)

ii)      Departmental Peer Review Committee (DPRCs) headed by the Secretary of the Scientific  Departments are constituted by the DOP&T with the approval of Prime Minister for a term of  2 years to consider the cases of extension of service of scientists beyond 60 years and up to                    62 years.

iii)    Extension of service of eminent scientists of international stature

iv)    Indicate whether this will block promotion opportunities of others in the Department

v)      Will be processed further for approval of ACC through the office of the Establishment Officer

Sir, the above guidelines thoroughly overruled by DRDO establishment. When Dr APJ Kalam was granted extension of service he had the expertise and international recognition in his field (Missile Technology). Dr M Natrajan was granted extension on the basis of his work in MBT (Arjun Tank). Dr U R Rao, ISRO got extension because of his contribution in space technology.

DRDO, once Dr V K Atre became, SA to RM overruled the guidelines of DoPT provisions for extension. A new culture was established that is those scientists who were close to Dr Atre they were recommended for extension without justifying  their contributions to science & technology. Afterwards the secretary of DRDO used this tool for those who are expert in misappropriation and manipulation of Government funds and misinterpretation of Government rules to their personal benefits.

These scientists nowhere stand as per guidelines of FR 56 (d) and you will find most of cases the scientists are involved totally in administrative job for years. Interestingly Secretary DRDO removed the required paras of Annexure FR 56 (d) where it states the justification why his service is needed and the details of contributions are thoroughly overruled.

Surprisingly, no one pointed these corrupt practices in the process of granting extension. Some applications which I have received by RTI from DoPT are enclosed for your ready reference. Which are the self explanatory, under the name of Defence research and under the shadow of official Secret Act 1923 and the bonafide possession of CCS Rules 1965 they have be-fooled the DoPT,PMO,ACC etc.

DRDO at an interval of every three months gives extension to at least 10-12 scientists, out of which not a single scientist deserve the recommendation as per guide lines of DoPT O M No.26012/8/2011-Estt. (A) Dated the 16th May, 2011 Normally DRDO Hqrs recommend extension to the (Service Provider) like Sh T Mohan Rao, Ex Director, GTRE (Massage Parlour Fame), DRDO recommend Dr S K Vasudeva of SPIC even beyond 64 years of age as he arranged the all cocktails parties + in 5* with help of CS Constructions etc and provide Mrs Kanimozhi‘s methods routing money through her daughter’s firm M/S M V- Grfix as IB already reported to PMO.

DRDO recommends the name of scientists/Directors who manage the misappropriation of funds of projects/ programs. As an example the case of Sh R C Aggarwal, Director, DEAL, Dehradun and Sh Iqbal Singh of IRDE, Dehradun Sh R C Aggarwal joined as Charge-man and become Director, DEAL as Scientist ‘G’ in 2007.

He has no international publications,
No patents,
No significant contribution in any projects at LRDE, NPOL, DLRL and DEAL where he was posted earlier

As a director he wrote an essay (cut paste copy technology) on Software Defined Radio and prepared a proposal for sanction having 60 sub contracts paras. This proposal opened up an avenue to distribute poor tax payer’s money. Rs 100 Crores sanctioned for SDR project and with few months he was promoted as Scientist ‘H’ and also got extension for two years and waiting Scientist for Director’s post Sh K N Rao of DEAL died with shock (Heart Attack).

Sh R C Aggarwal’s extension was  recommended by Dr Arun Kumar, DOP, DRDO who was Scientist ‘E’ in 2001 when Sh R C Aggarwal was Scientist ‘F’. The DPRC which recommended Sh R C Aggarwal had a external member Dr P S Goel, Charman, RAC, whose contribution in ISRO as scientist is big zero, No international publications, No patents, only cut copy paste technology expertise.

Sh R C Aggarwal spent Rs 10 Lakh on TA/DA per year so he is able to contribute Rs 1.25 Lakhs per month in GPF account. As he is using Red beacon on his vehicle drawing Transport allowance using official driver in private car for fooling department.

Sh R C Aggarwal very bluntly says “the development of SDR will take 20 years time” and the PDC of SDR is 36 months.

Dr S C Jain who is enjoying extension but in the same time did not get the promotion to Scientist ‘H’, when he was not fit for promotion then how come he was recommended for extension in service, it can only happened in DRDO.

He has no international publications,
No patents,
No significant contribution in any projects at DEAL

But he is master in manipulation of government funds and misinterpretation of government rules in the interest of his boss. The reason he was benefited, was to get extension and job for his son who has fake qualification.

Sh Iqbal Singh Scientist ‘H’, IRDE, Dehradun got extension without justification of his scientific contribution.

He has no international publications,
No patents,
No significant contribution in any projects at IRDE

Only significant contribution is misappropriation of government funds, he gave orders to a firm where his son works

Dr S S Sundaram, Director, IRDE, Distinguished Scientist got extension for his golden achievement in project SAMYUKTA (Electronic Warfare),  it is well known that Project SAMYUKTA started with Rs 250 Crores initial cost in May 1994 and when buried   unceremoniously in 2006 it consumed Rs 6000 Crores of poor tax payer’s money.

Dr Arun Kumar, DOP, DRDO never did science and there is no question of scientific contribution. He is master in manipulation the governments rules and extend the path of favoritism to benefit DRDO’s top brasses wards. Appointment of his own daughter as scientist ‘B’ by violating all recruitment rules of DRDO. The enquiry is going on without any result like DRDO projects because the chairman of enquiry Dr Salwan, Ex DRDO scientist got Rs 80 Lakhs project with Rs 1 Lakh/month salary from Dr Arun Kumar itself.

The Honorable Prime Minister is requested to stop this criminal act of DRDO’s extension business, which they are recommending without justification. Please go through the recommended applications of DRDO scientists which I have received from DoPT through RTI.

Sir, this is the major reason of brain drain in DRDO because I am receiving lot of mails of ex DRDO young scientists from all over the world in my website www.corruptionindrdo.com, they share their experiences in this pathetic condition of DRDO.

Thanking you

Regards
 
 Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008
Phone – 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
E-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com,  prabhu@dandriyal.com
Website –  www.corruptionindrdo.com

Enclosed:

  1.   Extension applications of DRDO scientists
  2.  FR 56 (d) annexure for comparison the truth 

 Copy to.

  1. Defence Minister, Room No 104- South Block, New Delhi- 110011
  2.  Shri Shashi Kant Sharma, Defence Secretary, Room !01- South Block, New Delhi – 110011
  3.  Ms. Alka Sirohi,  Secretary (Personnel), Room No 112, North Block-110011
  4.  Dr V K Saraswat, D G (R&D), DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg, New Delhi=110105
    FR 56 (d) comparison
    No.26012/8/2011-Estt. (A)
    Government of India
    Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions
    (Department of Personnel and Training)
    North Block, New Delhi,
    Dated the 16th May, 2011

    OFFICE MEMORANDUM

    Subject:  Grant of Extension of service of Scientists beyond the age of superannuation – Issue of instructions regarding.

    The undersigned is directed to refer to Department of Personnel & Taining O.M. No.26012/6/2002-Estt.(A) dated 9.12.2002 (copy enclosed) on the subject mentioned above laying down the criteria for considering cases of extension of service of Scientists in terms of proviso to FR 56(d) and to state that the guidelines for extension of service of eminent scientists of international stature beyond 62 years have been further reviewed as a need has been felt for a rigorous Peer group screening by an inter disciplinary Committee of experts.

    2.   Departmental Peer Review Committee (DPRCs) headed by the Secretary of the Scientific Departments are constituted by the DOP&T with the approval of Prime Minister for a term of 2 years to consider the cases of extension of service of scientists beyond 60 years and up to 62 years.

    3.   It has now been decided with the approval of Prime Minister that the existing/reconstituted Departmental Peer Review Committee shall also do the first stage screening of Scientists for their extension beyond 62 years of age and thereafter the DPRCs’ recommendations will be placed before the Committee under the Cabinet Secretary provided that the DPRCs’ have at least two outside experts apart from Secretary (Personnel & Training). The DPRCs must give detailed justification for such extension based on merits of the case; the international stature of the person recommended and also indicates whether this will block promotion opportunities of others in the Department. Such recommendations of the DPRCs for extension of service of Scientists beyond 62 years will be sent of the Establishment Division of the Department of Personnel & Training for placing the cases before the Committee under Cabinet Secretary. Only such cases recommended by the Committee under Cabinet Secretary will be processed further for approval of ACC through the office of the Establishment Officer. Cases of extension of service of Scientists beyond 60 years and up to 62 years recommended by DPRC will continue to be sent directly to the office of Establishment Officer in DOP&T as at present.

    4.   All proposals for extension of service of Scientists beyond 62 years in terms of the 3rd proviso to FR 56(d) may, therefore, be processed keeping in view the above guidelines in addition to the criteria stipulated in the OM dated 9.12.2010.

    (P.Prabhakaran)
    Director (E)
  5. DoPT RTI reply
    DoPT Reply for Sh R C Aggarwal Page 1
    DoPT Reply for Sh R C Aggarwal page 2
    DoPT Reply For Sh R C Aggarwal page 3
    DoPT Reply for Sh Iqbal Singh page 1
    DoPT Reply for Sh Iqbal Singh Page 2

    DoPT Reply for Sh Iqbal Singh page 3
Drdo

Favoritism, Nepotism and Plagiarism

1 Comment
To                                                                                                                       31st July 2011
The Defence Minister
Room No -104, South Block
New Delhi – 110011

Subject: Favoritism, Nepotism and Plagiarism

Honorable Sir,

Dr P S Goel, Chairman, RAC, DRDO does not deserve this high office. He is a byproduct of favoritism, nepotism and plagiarism.

From his bio-data two things are missing because he has very cleverly written names of those awards which are purely fabricated in ISRO.  Prestigious Shanti  Swaroop Bhatnager Medal  and International publications with volume no, Page no, year of publication and the name of journal he should write if at all he has contributed.

Due to Policy of the government he was made director in one small unit of ISRO Hqrs. His subject expertise is such that he appreciates only the work of CP Technology (Cut Paste Technology) as an example the following paper tells the strong and itself explanatory. Under his able leadership RAC has converted into one of the office where transfer posting, promotions and recruitments are sold.

Honorable High Court’s Judge ,  Justice SR Singh  inquired about plagiarism of then Vice Chancellor  Kumaoun University and result was the immediate resignation of  Vice Chancellor  Prof B S Rajput in 2003.

Raksha Mantri and Scientific Adviser to Raksha Mantri are requested to investigate the enclosed following paper which is the evidence of corrupt practices prevailing in DRDO and take appropriate action against Dr. P S Goel and the plagiarist scientist, withdraw the medal given to her and also remove the paper from DRDO Technology Spectrum May pp 243-246. So that Indian defence forces may get their confidence on DRDO or else the paper will be put up for legal action so that plagiarism nurtured by Dr P S Goel is suitably dealt with.

Thanking you

Regards

Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal 
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008
Tele/Fax –0135- 2787750, Mobile- 09411114879,
E-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com ,  prabhu@dandriyal.com
Website –  www.corruptionindrdo.com

Enclosed Letter from received from RAC employee

 

RAC letter received page 1
RAC letter received page 2
RAC received letter Page 3
Paper Published by Ms Jyoti Bhalla

 

Paper Published by Ms Jyoti Bhalla
Paper Published by Ms Jyoti Bhalla

 

Paper Published by Ms Jyoti Bhalla

 

ACTUAL References from which ditto paragraphs are copied
1. http:/ len.wikipedia.org/
a. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real-timeoperating system
b. http://en.wikipedia.org/wikilHistoryofSymbian
c. http:/ /en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbian
2. http://www.dotcominfoway.com/attachmentsI268 White-paper -on- Mobile-OS-and-efforts­ on-Open-standards. pdf
3. http://www.tolmol.com/bp/mobile-phones/mobile-operating-system-os.htm
4. http://www.scribd.com/doc/35602787 IMobile-Application-Testing
5. http://www.dauniv.ac.in/downloads/Mobilecomputing/MobileCompChap 14L02MobileOS.  llilf (Oxford University Press 2007. All rights reserved)
6. http://www.itbusinessedge.com/topics/show.aspx?t=752
7. http://www.osdata.com/kind/kinds.htm
8. http://symbianresources.com/tutorials/ general I mobileos/MobileOperatingSystems. pdf
9. http://books.google.co.in/books?id=WivXOHmVTIMC&pg=P A31&lpg=P A31&dq=”familia
      r+tasks+such+as+reading+e-mail” &source=bl&ots=q
     (Operating System Principles – By Abraham Silberschatz)
10. http://www.scribd.com/doc/52228167/321CONCLUSION
11. http://wiki.nectec.or.th/gitiwiki/pub/Knowledge/Symbian OS/simbian02.ipg
12. http:/ Itechnox.org/symbian-os/
13. http://www.itu.dk/courses/ISOM/E2005/Nokia and Symbian OS%5Bl%5D.pdf
14. http://www.iavamidlet.comI2008/07 I 121how-to-install-the-nokia-s60-sdk-in-netbeans-for­
      i2me-development.html
15. http://wiki.answers.com/O/What are the advantage of symbian mobile os
16. www.verifysoft.com/de coveritv casestudy symbian.pdf