Tag Archives: Min. of Defence

DRDO Hqrs Not Having Capabilities to Manage Fake/ Unrecognized Diploma /Degree Business – IV

To,                                                                               5th February 2014
Dr. RB Sharma, CPIO,
DRDO HQ, Min. of Defence,
DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg,
New Delhi-110011                             

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect to  your RTI reply RTI/01/2091/P/2013/0387 dated 27th December 2013 regarding  on acquiring higher qualification by DRDO officials at their own. As per details provide by DRDO RTI cell the following DRDO official acquired their qualification from ANNA UNIVERSITY, CHENNAI. As per website of ANNA UNIVERSITY, CHENNAI the B.Tech is not in the list Programmes Offered in Distance Mode.

Refer to DOP&T O.M. No. 1/2/89 – Estt. (Pay-I) dated 9-4-1999 para -3

The qualifications meriting grant of incentive should be recognised by the All India Council for Technical Education, Department of Electronics, Deemed University, University or recognised by the Government

  1. Sh R Anandh, STA ‘B’ CVRDE acquired B.Tech (E &C Engineering) in 1 December 2010 from  ANNA UNIVERSITY, CHENNAI
  2. Sh S Purshotham, STA ‘B’ CVRDE acquired B.Tech (Mechanical Engineering) in 1 December 2010 from  ANNA UNIVERSITY, CHENNAI

In respect of above please provide following information.

  1. The certified copy of verification before approving lump sum grant of incentive to above officials.
  2. Certified copy of recommendation for lump sum grant of incentive received by competent authority from their respective establishments.
  3. Copy of DRDO’s procedure followed for verification of Degree’s/Diploma/M.Sc/ Ph D

Note : Matter is directly related to corruption and not exempted under Section 24 (1)

Regards

Prabhu  Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur,
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website www.corruptionindrdo.com
  1. Enclosed : Web page of ANNA UNIVERSITY, CHENNAI

Registration Number               MODEF/R/2014/60229

DRDO Hqrs Not Having Capabilities to Manage Fake/ Unrecognized Diploma /Degree Business – III

To,                                                                               4th  February 2014
Dr. RB Sharma, CPIO,
DRDO HQ, Min. of Defence,
DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg,
New Delhi-110011                            

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect to  your RTI reply RTI/01/2091/P/2013/0387 dated 27th December 2013 regarding  on acquiring higher qualification by DRDO officials at their own. As per details provide by DRDO RTI cell the following DRDO official acquired their qualification from MAHARSHI DAYANAND UNIVERSITY, ROHTAK. As per website of MAHARSHI DAYANAND UNIVERSITY, ROHTAK the M Sc (Computer Science) is not in the list Programmes Offered in Distance Mode.

Refer to DOP&T O.M. No. 1/2/89 – Estt. (Pay-I) dated 9-4-1999 para -3

The qualifications meriting grant of incentive should be recognised by the All India Council for Technical Education, Department of Electronics, Deemed University, University or recognised by the Government

 

  1. Sh U Maheshwarn, STA ‘C’ DIPR acquired M Sc, (Computer Science) in 3  September 2009 from  MAHARSHI DAYANAND UNIVERSITY, ROHTAK
  2. Sh Deepak Kumar, STA ‘B’ DESIDOC acquired M Sc, (Computer Science) in 31  March 2010 from  MAHARSHI DAYANAND UNIVERSITY, ROHTAK
  3. Smt Laxmi Verma, STA ‘C’ DESIDOC acquired M Sc, (Computer Science) in 20 September 2011 from  MAHARSHI DAYANAND UNIVERSITY, ROHTAK
  4. Sh Puneet Kumar, STA ‘C’ DESIDOC acquired M Sc, (Computer Science)  in 30 September 2011 from  MAHARSHI DAYANAND UNIVERSITY, ROHTAK
  5. Sh Mandeep Singh Basra, STA ‘B’ IRDE acquired M Sc, (Computer Science) in 30 September 2012 from  MAHARSHI DAYANAND UNIVERSITY, ROHTAK

In respect of above please provide following information.

  1. The certified copy of verification before approving lump sum grant of incentive to above officials.
  2. Certified copy of recommendation for lump sum grant of incentive received by competent authority from their respective establishments.
  3. Copy of DRDO’s procedure followed for verification of Degree’s/Diploma/M.Sc/ Ph D

Note : Matter is directly related to corruption and not exempted under Section 24 (1)

Regards

Prabhu  Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur,
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website www.corruptionindrdo.com
  1. Enclosed : Web page of MAHARSHI DAYANAND UNIVERSITY, ROHTAK

Registration Number            MODEF/R/2014/60226 MDU,Rohtak

DRDO Hqrs Not Having Capabilities to Manage Fake/ Unrecognized Diploma /Degree Business – II

To,                                                                               3rd  February 2014
Dr. RB Sharma, CPIO,
DRDO HQ, Min. of Defence,
DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg,
New Delhi-110011                           

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect to  your RTI reply RTI/01/2091/P/2013/0387 dated 27th December 2013 regarding  on acquiring higher qualification by DRDO officials at their own. As per details provide by DRDO RTI cell the following DRDO official acquired their qualification from Jawharlal  Nehru Technological University, Hyderabad. The website of Jawharlal  Nehru Technological University, Hyderabad stated in their website that “ the school was offering B.Tech correspondence – cum – contact programme (CCC) from 1983 to 2009. Keeping in view of the ACITE guidelines for B.Tech (CCC) has been suspended since 2010.

Refer to DOP&T O.M. No. 1/2/89 – Estt. (Pay-I) dated 9-4-1999 para -3

The qualifications meriting grant of incentive should be recognised by the All India Council for Technical Education, Department of Electronics, Deemed University, University or recognised by the Government

  1. Sh. Siyaram, STA ‘B’  RCI acquired B Tech Mech Engg in 1 June 2010 from JNTU, Hyderabad
  2. Shri A Venkateshwara Rao, STA ‘B’ DRDL, acquired B Tech Mech Engg in 1 August 2010 from JNTU, Hyderabad
  3. Sh. G Venkatesh STA ‘, DMRL acquired B Tech Civil Engg in 7 March 2012 from JNTU, Hyderabad
  4. Sh. B Baludu, TO’A’ RCI, acquired B Tech Mech. Engg in 7 March 2012 from JNTU, Hyderabad

In respect of above please provide following information.

  1. The certified copy of verification before approving lump sum grant of incentive to above officials.
  2. Certified copy of recommendation for lump sum grant of incentive received by competent authority from their respective establishments.
  3. Copy of DRDO’s procedure followed for verification of Degree’s/Diploma/M.Sc/ Ph D

Note : Matter is directly related to corruption and not exempted under Section 24 (1)

Regards

Prabhu  Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur,
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website www.corruptionindrdo.com

Registration Number            – MODEF/R/2014/60222

jntu

 

RTI  http://bit.ly/1lwUyBO  Reply from DRDO

RTI reply RTI reply1 RTI reply2 RTI reply3 RTI reply4 RTI reply5 RTI reply6 RTI reply7 RTI reply8 RTI reply9 RTI reply10

RTI – DRDO Hqrs – Sceintist ‘H’ Result 2013

To,                                                                               2nd February 2014
Dr. RB Sharma, CPIO,
DRDO HQ, Min. of Defence,
DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg,
New Delhi-110011                          

Hello,

In pursuance of Rule 8(2) Schedule ID of DRDS Rules 1979 as amended a Peer Committee for assessment of Scientists G to Scientists  H (OS) in the year 2013 was constituted and assessed the suitability of Scientists  G for the grade of Scientists H (OS). Subsequently several Scientists G were promoted to the rank of Scientist H  (OS). However declaration of results for promotions from Scientist G to Scientists H (OS) was surprisingly delayed and announced in month of October, 2013 instead of July 2013.

In reference to the above kindly provide the following information under RTI Act 2005.

INFORMATION SOUGHT

  1. Copy of the letter by which competent authority constituted Peer Committee.
  2. The details of Chairman and Members of the Peer Committee.
  3. The dates on which Peer Committee meetings were held for assessing the suitability of Scientists G for promotion to Scientists H(Outstanding Scientist).
  4. The date on which results has been declared.
  5. The date from which the promotions of Scientist H (Outstanding Scientist) in the year 2013 became effective.
  6. The date on which results for promotion from Scientists G to Scientists H (OS) were declared and became effective in the year 2012.
  7. The reasons for delay in declaration of results.
  8. These promotions were conducted under which promotion scheme of Government of India. (Flexible Complementing Scheme (FCS) or Merit Promotion Scheme (MPS).
  9. Copy of the minutes of Peer Committee duly approved by Defence Minister.

10. Whether any representation was submitted by any assessed Scientist G to Defence Minister regarding his/her promotion before the declaration of results. (Yes/No)

11. If answer to point (9) is yes then provide copy of the letter/representation.

12. Whether any review Peer Committee meeting was held again in the year 2013 for reviewing the recommendations/Minutes  of previous Peer Committee Meeting held earlier in 2013  for promotion of Scientists G to Scientists H (Outstanding Scientists) for the year 2013. (Yes/No)

13. If answer to point (12) is yes then provide the copy of Minutes of review Peer Committee Meeting for promotion of Scientists G to Scientists H (Outstanding Scientists) for the year 2013.

14. Provide the final list of Scientists who were promoted to Scientist H (OS) in the year 2013.

NOTE

  1. Please refer CIC decision in File No. CIC/LS/A/2012/002612 dated 22.3.2013 (Dr. Neelam Bhalla Vs. DRDO)-
  2. Information asked is on Establishment Matter and not exempted u/s 24 of RTI Act as per various decisions of CIC

Regards

Prabhu  Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur,
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website www.corruptionindrdo.com

 

 

Registration Number         MODEF/R/2014/60215                 

RTI – Scientist ‘H’ – 2013

To,                                                       1st February 2014
Under Secretary (RR-II)
Central Public Information Officer
DOPT, Min. of Personnel
Room No. 268, North Block
New Delhi-110011                             

SUBJECT: APPLICATION UNDER RTI ACT 2005

Hello,

Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO), Min. of Defence conducts assessment of Scientist ’G’ for the promotion to the grade Scientist ‘H’(Outstanding Scientist) every year in month of June under the provisions of Rule 8(2) of DRDS Rules 1979 as amended and the results are declared in month of July of the same year. The assessment for promotions from Scientist ‘G’ to Scientist ‘H’ (Outstanding Scientist) was conducted in June 2013 for the assessment year 2013 and result was declared in October 2013

In reference to the above kindly provide the following information under RTI Act 2005.

INFORMATION SOUGHT

  1. Certified copy of Minutes of the Peer Committee Meeting for promotion of Scientists ‘G’ to Scientists ‘H’ (Outstanding Scientists) for the year 2013.
  2. Copy of Peer Committee meeting recommendation duly approved by Defence Minister for promotion of Scientists ‘G’ to Scientists ‘H’ (Outstanding Scientists) for the year 2013.
  3. Whether any review Peer Committee meeting was held again in the year 2013 for reviewing the recommendations/Minutes  of previous Peer Committee Meeting held earlier in 2013  for promotion of Scientists ‘G’ to Scientists ‘H’ (Outstanding Scientists) for the year 2013. (Yes/No)
  4. If answer to point(4) is yes then provide the copy of Minutes of review Peer Committee Meeting for promotion of Scientists ‘G’ to Scientists ‘H’ (Outstanding Scientists) for the year 2013.

Regards

Prabhu  Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur,
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website www.corruptionindrdo.com

Registration Number          DOP&T/R/2014/60430         

 

CORRUPTION IN PROCUREMENT OF CHEMICALS AT DMSRDE KANPUR

To                                                                                                          
Central Vigilance Commissioner,
Central Vigilance Commission,
SatarktaBhawan, A- Block, GPO Complex, INA
New Delhi-110023

SUBJECT:      MULTI-CRORE SCAM CORRUPTION IN PROCUREMENT OF CHEMICALS IN DMSRDE KANPUR COMPLAINT AGAINST

  1. MR. AMIT SARAIYA, SCIENTIST ‘D’, HEAD MATERIALS MANAGEMENT GROUP (MMG),
  2. DR. DARSHAN LAL, CHAIRMAN ‘STORES PRUCHASE COMMITTEE’  
  3. Dr. ARVIND KUMAR SAXENA, DIRECTOR, DMSRDE, KANPUR

Sir,

BRIEF FACTS OF THE COMPLAINT

  1. Defence Materials & Stores Research & Development Establishment (DMSRDE), Kanpur is an establishment under Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO), Min. of Defence, DRDO Bhawan, New Delhi.
  2. Purchase Management 2006 is applicable for procurement of store items in DRDO.  Gross irregularities and violation of Purchase Management 2006 was made in procurement of Chemicals in year 2012 when the cases were indented by officers of MMG under threat illegal orders of Head ‘Materials Management Group’ (MMG)& Dr. A K Saxena Director DMSRDE
  3.  Dr. A K Saxena Director is an incompetent, arrogant and corrupt administrator who has violated all the rules and regulations of purchase. In the year 2012 while chairing ‘Head of Divisions’ (HOD) meeting, he directed that all HOD’s shall ensure that all demands of chemicals what-so-ever should be immediately forwarded to Head MMG. Head MMG shall consolidate all the requirements and one order shall be placed to get maximum discount from the suppliers
  4. Accordingly Head MMG circulated a memo requesting for the details of chemicals as per the enclosed format. Now here is where criminal conspiracy starts and instead of placing one consolidated demand, Head MMG & Dr. A K Saxena, Director  & CFA split the orders of various chemicals to the tune of Rs. 2.2 Crores.
  5. Procurement of CHEMICALS

Chemicals worth total estimated cost of Rs.2,19,19,074/-were procured centrally by a single division i.e. Material Management Group on limited tender basis splitting total demand against requirements received from various divisions of lab

  • into 30 cases below Rs.10 lakh(to avoid TPC) during 10 months period(from 12 Oct 2011 to 31 July 2012)
  • these demands were cleared by the same SPC (Store Procurement Committee)  Chairman Darshan Lal Joint Director, and
  • issuing more than 40 supply orders during Apr 2012 to  Dec 2012
  • Point to be noted that only in Month of Oct 2011   22 Demands worth total estimated cost of Rs. 15333034.00 were raised out of which 16 Demands worth total estimated cost of Rs 11471067.00 were cleared in one SPC meeting held on 16th Nov 2011 by SPC (Store Procurement Committee) dealing cases costing less than Rs 10 lakh headedby Chairman Darshan Lal Joint Director. Further it has bypassed the expert higher level SPC (Store Procurement Committee) dealing cases costing more than Rs 10 lakh headed by an honest officer Chairman Dr. DK Setua, Addl. Director having expertise with chemical background who might have not permitted splitting of cases in this manner.
  1. These 30 No. Cases for which at least details up to supply order date(which confirms that supply order is prepared) are mentioned in following tables

Table-1

  • For Sl. 01-03 total estimated cost  is Rs. 2832300.00 and total value of 08 Supply orders is Rs. 2635059.00
  • Point to be noted that
    • These Demand are raised on Limited Tender basis by same indenter officer, on same date 31-Jul-12 ,
    • SPC conducted on 22nd Aug 2012,
    • CFA approval accorded on 05-Sep-12, Tender Enquiry issued on the same date 05-Sep-12, and
    • 08 No Supply orders worth Rs. 2635059.00 are placed on same date 4-Dec-2012.
    • Demands of chemicals vide DMSRDE/13MMG042 & DMSRDE/13MMG041 at Sl.No. 01 and 02 reflect same chemical “Ethylene Di Chloride AR Make: Rankem/SD fine /Qualigens /SRL Each Pack of 2.5 ltr”
    • The requirement of chemicals was split into demands below Rs. 10.0 Lakh to avoid TPC and open tender.
    • DRDO Chemical Rate Contract exists w.e.f. 17th Sep 2012 and placement of these supply orders under the RC would have fetched better quality at discounted prices.
    • Placement of these orders on limited tender to known local vendors ignoring DRDO Chemical RC  clearly exhibit vested interest through manipulation  in prices, quality, pack size etc so as to fetch financial benefits hence indicates financial corruption/ corrupt practices of giving business/ benefits to own firms.chem table1

Table-2

  • For Sl. 04-08 total estimated cost  is Rs. 3422198.00
    • These Demand are raised on Limited Tender basis in December 2011 from 02nd to 31st Dec2011,
    • These Demand are cleared in 05 SPC meetings  conducted over a period of 45 days from  21st Dec 2011 to 02nd Feb 2012
    • CFA approval accorded and Tender Enquiry issued over a period of 45 days from  26th Dec 2011 to 14th Feb 2012, and
    • Supply orders prepared over a month period from 17th Apr 2012 to 22nd May 2012.
  • Point to be noted that
  • The requirement of chemicals was split into demands below Rs. 10.0 Lakh to avoid TPC and open tender which would have fetched better quality at discounted prices. Further it has bypassed the expert higher level SPC (Store Procurement Committee) dealing cases costing more than Rs 10 lakh.

Placement of these orders on limited tender to known local vendors clearly exhibit vested interest through manipulation  in prices, quality, pack size etc so as to fetch financial benefits hence indicates financial corruption/ corrupt practices of giving business/ benefits to own firms.chem table2

Table-3

  • For Sl. 09-17 total estimated cost  is Rs. 6272502.00
    • From Sl No.09-15 Demand worth total estimated cost   Rs. 51.00 lakh are raised on Limited Tender basis on 31st Oct 2011  and Sl No 16,17 on 24,25th Oct 2011
    • These Demand are cleared in one  SPC meeting  conducted on   16th Nov 2011
    • CFA approval accorded and Tender Enquiry issued over a period of 15 days from  8th Dec 2011 to 21st Dec 2011, and
    • Supply orders prepared over six months period from  14th Jan 2012 to 22nd Jun 2012 (i.e. there appears no urgency).
  • Point to be noted that
  • The requirement of chemicals was split into demands below Rs. 10.0 Lakh to avoid TPC and open tender which would have fetched better quality at discounted prices. Further it has bypassed the expert higher level SPC (Store Procurement Committee) dealing cases costing more than Rs. 10 lakh headed by an honest officer Chairman Dr. DK Setua. Addl. Director having expertise with chemical background who might have not permitted splitting of cases in this manner.
  • Placement of these orders on limited tender to known local vendors clearly exhibit vested interest through manipulation  in prices, quality, pack size etc so as to fetch financial benefits hence indicates financial corruption/ corrupt practices of giving business/ benefits to own firms.chem table3

Table-4

  • For Sl. 18-30 total estimated cost  is Rs. 9060532.00
    • From Sl No.09-15 Demand are raised on Limited Tender basis over a period of 10 days from12th Oct 2011  to  21st Oct 2011
    • Out of these Demand most are cleared in one SPC meeting conducted on   16th Nov 2011 and only four demands were cleared in SPC meetings held on 8th Dec 2011 (01),  06th Jan 2012 (02 ) and 02nd Feb 2012 (01).
    • CFA approval accorded and Tender Enquiry issued over a period of 45 days from  29th Nov 2011 to 14th Feb 2012, and
    • Supply orders prepared over two and half months periodfrom  18th May 2012 to 30th  July2012.
  • Point to be noted that
    • The requirement of chemicals was split into demands below Rs. 10.0 Lakh to avoid TPC and open tender which would have fetched better quality at discounted prices. Further it has bypassed the expert higher level SPC (Store Procurement Committee) dealing cases costing more than Rs 10 lakh headed by an honest officer Chairman Dr. DK Setua, Addl. Director having expertise with chemical background who might have not permitted splitting of cases in this manner.
    • Placement of these orders on limited tender to known local vendors clearly exhibit vested interest through manipulation  in prices, quality, pack size etc so as to fetch financial benefits hence indicates financial corruption/ corrupt practices of giving business/ benefits to own firms.chem table4

From the facts stated above, it is amply crystal clear that prima facie material regarding Abuse of Authority by arrogant and corrupt administrator Dr. A K Saxena, Director DMSRDE exists.

    • That he entered into criminal conspiracy with Mr. Darshan Lal, Joint Director, Chairman SPC and Head MMG with an intention to cheat DRDO and exchequer’s money.
    • In pursuance of the said criminal conspiracy,  Dr. A K Saxena, Director and Mr. A K Singh, Technical Staff Officer of Director DMSRDE are tampering with evidence / documents that shall be prejudice to fair trial, investigation, trial or any inquiry.

In view of the above mentioned facts and evidences it is earnestly requested that an order for through investigation of all procurement done by Dr A K Saxena after assuming charge as Director, DMSRDE, DRDO, Kanpur to stop further corruption and wastage of poor tax payers money.

 

Date: 07th January 2014

 

Prabhu Dandriyal                                                                                                                             
21-Sunderwal, Raipur, Dehradun -248008                                                                              
0135-2787750 – 91-9411114879                                                                 
prabhudoon@gmail.com,  www.corruptionindrdo.com

 

Annexure -1 – ION DATED 12.12.2012 ISSUED BY MR. AMIT SARAIYA, HEAD MMG chem ion