Category Archives: PMO

न्‍यूज 24 एक्‍सक्‍लूसिव: मोदी को शिकायत करना इस वैज्ञानिक को पड़ा महंगा on March 20, 2015 8:08 pm

संजीव त्रिवेदी, नई दिल्ली (20 मार्च): प्रधानमंत्री नरेंद्र मोदी अपने मन की बात कार्यक्रम में पूरे देश से अपील करते हैं कि उन्हें सुझाव भेजिए। बताइए कि कैसे देश का भला किया जा सकता है। ऐसे में एक वैज्ञानिक सीधे प्रधानमंत्री दफ्तर को अपना सुझाव और शिकायत भेजते हैं। इस उम्मीद के साथ कि सरकार सुझाव के बारे में और जानकारी मांगेगी, शिकायत की जांच करेगी। लेकिन हुआ क्या। इसके आगे का पूरा सच आप जानेंगे तो कहीं आपका विश्वास सरकारी महकमों में सबसे ऊपर प्रधानमंत्री कार्यालय के काम करने के तरीके से ना उठ जाए।

28 सितंबर 2014 यही वो तारीख थी, जब वैज्ञानिक पशुपति राव ने सीधे प्रधानमंत्री कार्यालय की वेबसाइट पर एक सुझाव शिकायत के साथ दर्ज कराई। जिसमें उन्होंने कोटा में नेशनल फ्यूल कॉम्प्लेक्स का सेंटर बनाने में हुई गड़बड़ियों का जिक्र किया। वैज्ञानिक पशुपतिराव ने प्रधानमंत्री कार्यालय को बताया कि बाहर से एक्सपर्ट को अनुबंधित करने के नाम पर रिटायर्ड अफसरों को ही चुन लिया गया। 5 करोड़ का बजट बनाकर 16 लाख में काम पूरा किया गया। जबकि इतना पैसा खर्च करने की भी जरूरत नहीं थी क्योंकि सक्षम अफसरों के गैरवाजिब पदों पर बैठाकर संस्थान उनका इस्तेमाल नहीं कर रहा।

आप सोच रहे होंगे कि जब प्रधानमंत्री खुद देश के हित में जनता की भागीदारी चाहते हैं तो जरूर उन्होंने वैज्ञानिक पशुपतिराव के सुझाव और शिकायत पर जरूरी कदम उठाए होंगे। लेकिन इसके आगे क्या हुआ। आप जानकर चौंक जाएंगे। जो सुझाव और शिकायतें वैज्ञानिक पशुपतिराव ने प्रधानमंत्री कार्यालय को भेजी थीं। उनकी जांच कराने की जगह PMO ने उन्हीं के पास भेज दिया, जिनकी शिकायत की गई थी। इसके बाद वैज्ञानिक के विभाग में हंगामा मच गया। शिकायत करने वाले पशुपति राव को ही विभाग ने चिट्ठी दे दी। जिसमें लिखा गया आपको जो काम मिला है। उस पर ध्यान दीजिए। आपने स्टाफ की शिकायत की है। आगे भी सवाल जवाब होंगे।

हालांकि पशुपति राव के बारे में जब उनके विभाग से न्यूज 24 ने सवाल पूछा तो दावा किया गया कि कोई एक्शन नहीं लिया जाएगा। लेकिन सच पशुपति राव को मिली ये वो चिट्ठी भी है, जो न्यूज 24 के पास है, जिसमें साफ साफ लिखा है कि आप अपने काम पर ध्यान दें। प्रधानमंत्री कार्यालय के कामकाज को संभाल चुके राज्य मंत्री रहे नारायण सामी बताते हैं कि मोदी के ऑफिस की तरफ से बड़ी गलती हुई है जबकि मौजूदा मंत्री को तो पूरे मामले की खबर तक नहीं।

प्रधानमंत्री कार्यालय एक शिकायत को जांच करने की जगह उसी अफसर के पास भेज देता है जिसकी शिकायत की गई है और पीएमओ का कामकाज देखने वाले मंत्री कहते हैं कि जानकारी नहीं है। संभव है कि वो मामले को टालना चाहते हैं क्योंकि पशुपति राव के मामले में जो लापरवाही प्रधानमंत्री कार्यालय ने बरती है उसे लेकर सूचना के सिपाही प्रभु डॉड्रियाल ने पीएमओ में एक आरटीआई लगाई और इस आरटीआई का जवाब अब तक मोदी का कार्यालय तलाश ही रहा है। क्योंकि यही बताया गया है कि आपके सवाल का जवाब ढूंढने की प्रकिया जारी है।

प्रधानमंत्री कार्यालय ने अपने विभाग से जुड़ी शिकायत करने वाले वैज्ञानिक पशुपति राव की पहचान जाहिर की तो अब तक उन्हें सिर्फ कुछ हिदायती चिट्ठी और आगे सवाल जवाब के लिए तैयार रहने के लिए कहा गया है। लेकिन पीएमओ से हुई इस चूक ने याद दिलाई है 12 साल पहले प्रधानमंत्री कार्यालय से हुई बड़ी लापरवाही को। 12 साल पहले सत्येंद्र दुबे नाम के ईमानदार अफसर ने अपने विभाग में भ्रष्टाचार की सच्चाई प्रधानमंत्री कार्यालय तक पहुंचाई तो उसके बदले मौत दे दी गई।

सत्येंद्र दुबे नेशनल हाइवे अथॉरिटी में प्रोजेक्ट डायरेक्टर के पद पर थे। उन्होंने अपने विभाग में हो रहे भ्रष्टाचार का पूरा सच चिट्ठी में लिखकर प्रधानमंत्री कार्यालय के भेजा था। सत्येंद्र दुबे ने गुजारिश की थी कि उनका नाम जाहिर ना किया जाए। लेकिन तब पीएमओ ने सत्येंद्र दुबे के नाम के साथ उस चिट्ठी को कई विभागों को जारी किया था और फिर 27 नवंबर 2003 को सत्येंद्र दुबे की हत्या कर दी गई थी। 12 साल बाद पीएमओ ने फिर एक लापरवही की। गनीमत है कि इस बार सिर्फ शिकायतकर्ता को विभाग की तरफ से सवाल जवाब का ही सामना करना पड़ रहा है। लेकिन ये एक चेतावनी की घंटी है। क्योंकि अब पीएमओ ने ऐसी लापरवाही बरती तो जनता का वो भरोसा चूर चूर हो जाएगा, जो प्रधानमंत्री देते हैं।

RTI- Nuclear Fuel Complex, Hyderabad – PMO portal case

To                                                                                                                Date 15th March 2015
Shri S. Goverdhan Rao,                                                                                                                      CPIO & Dy. Chief Executive (Administration),                                                                             Nuclear Fuel Complex,                                                                                                                     Department of Atomic Energy Government of India,                                                               Hyderabad – 500 062.

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of NFC s Response to the Misleading report carried by Economic Times on 13.3.2015, posted on http://www.nfc.gov.in/ in reference of following points.

Point No 7. Against NFC s advertisements for hiring external professionals for the Project Management Consultancy jobs offers were received from outside and retired Officers of NFC. After evaluation, four retired Officers were selected and awarded the Consultancy contract for review Engineering documents and drawings prepared by Detailed Engineering Consultants i.e., M/s. Engineering India Limited.

Point No 8. While sanction for Project Management Consultancy at an estimated cost of Rs. 5 Crores was available, NFC managed to get the work done by spending only Rs. 16.15 lakhs by engaging retired Officers as Consultants, which NFC saved huge amount and considerable time in the process.

Point No 9. Shri Pasupathi Rao was informed of the factual position.

  1. Provide the total number of job offer other than retired officer from NFC, their names and qualification, experience which they have submitted with said offer.
  2. Name board members and name of chairman who selected four retired officer.
  3. Whether any of these four retired officer involved in planning or any means with Green Field Project at Kota earlier when they were in NFC.
  4. Provide the copy of justification given for budgeting estimated cost of Rs 5 crores in the name of Project Management Consultancy for Green Field Project at Kota.
  5. The total amount as salary, as transport allowances, medical allowances, TA/DA, communication bills and any other payments was given to these four retired officer as consultant of above said project up to 28th Feb 2015.
  6. The copy of information given to the factual position to Shri Pasupathi Rao as stated in point no 9 of NFC response.

Regards
Prabhu Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur,
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com website www.corruptionindrdo.com

Registration Number      DOATE/R/2015/60170

Senior nuclear scientist faces wrath of offering suggestions to PM Modi

India TV News Desk [ Updated 13 Mar 2015, 12:22:05
New Delhi: One of India’s senior nuclear scientists, Pashupati Rao, who works at Nuclear Fuel Complex (NFC) run by the Department of Atomic Energy (DAE) is now facing wrath for sending suggestions to Prime Minister Narendra Modi on a critical national project.

On 28 September, 2014, Rao had sent his suggestions including sensitive matters on the new nuclear complex to PM’s official portal (pmindia.gov.in), which PMO had further sent to Rao’s employer, DAE, marking them as ‘grievance’ and sent out another mail to Rao on January 21 this year, saying his ‘grievance’ has been disposed.

The PMO, in its communication to DAE, had revealed Rao’s name and designation, thus making his full identity known to his superiors.

Following this, DAE persistently started following up with Rao asking for explanations while the latter desperately continued to explain himself.

As published in Economic Times, some DAE officials on condition of anonymity even said that Rao may face serious consequences.

Prominent whistleblower Prabhu Dandriyal, who some years ago had claimed to have exposed corruption in Defence Research & Development Organization, filed a Right to Information application on January 27 this year with the PMO on Rao’s matter.

Dandriyal, in his RTI application demanded to know the guidelines followed by PMO while dealing with sensitive matters. He told that the PMO reply that came a month later, on February 27, said the request is being processed, and details are being collected.

In the Rao’s suggestions to the Prime Minister, he had proposed that an independent team be appointed to review the project and he also mentioned technical details on cutting costs in it.

However, the PMO having sent his suggestions as ‘grievance’ to DAE has put the top nuclear scientist in a bureaucratic nightmare.

The communication that happened with PMO was with NFC, Hyderabad, where Rao worked.

His matter was turned into a staff grievance. Although the scientist tried hard to explain his stand however, nothing worked in his favor.

In one of the communications to the Grievance Redressal Committee, Rao wrote, “I am a successful officer and I have been awarded with DAE group achievement award for indigenization associated work. My feedback given to the PMO which is converted as my grievance is not aimed at any individual.”

However, DAE has not relented and on February 10, it had sent out a letter to Rao reminding him that his job was limited to helping him in maintenance of NFC.

“As an organization, we will follow the process. As he is a staff member, it is being treated as a staff grievance and is being looked into,” S Goverdhan Rao, deputy chief executive of NFC, told ET.

Meanwhile, Dandriyal is still awaiting a full reply from the PMO. He says, “It will be very difficult for people from the system to come out and expose corruption and inefficiency if there is no mechanism to protect them.”

Prime Minister’s Office Marked Rao’s Mail as `Grievance’

Mar 13 2015 : The Economic Times (Delhi)

Lands in hot water with DAE bosses for writing to PM
He wrote to the prime minister, tried to do good for a critical national project, and now he’s in trouble.
One of India’s senior nuclear scientists, Pashupati Rao, who works at Nuclear Fuel Complex (NFC), run by the Department of Atomic Energy (DAE), is now battling his employer for having written to the prime minister offering suggestions on streamlining the setting up of a new nuclear facility at Kota, Rajasthan. DAE comes under the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO).

ET has reviewed the relevant correspondence between the PMO, DAE and the scientist. The PMO didn’t respond to ET’s queries on this matter.Rao did not participate in this story.DAE responded to ET’s questions. On September 28, 2014, Rao sent his suggestions to PM’s official portal (pmindia.gov.in), which invites citizens to share ideas as well as to write to the Prime Minister.

But although Rao had communicated sensitive matters on the new nuclear complex, the PMO had sent them to Rao’s employer, DAE, marking them as `grievance’, and it sent a mail to Rao on January 21 this year, saying his `grievance’ has been disposed. The PMO’s communication to Rao’s employers had also given the name and designation of the scientist, thus making his full identity known to his superiors.

This started a process of DAE relentlessly asking for explanations from the scientist and the latter desperately seeking to explain himself. Some DAE officials who did not want to be identified told ET that Rao may face serious consequences.

Prominent whistleblower Prabhu Dandriyal, who some years ago had claimed to have exposed corruption in Defence Research & Development Organisation, filed a Right to Information application on January 27 this year with the PMO on Rao’s matter.

Dandriyal had asked what guidelines the PMO follows when dealing with `sensitive’ communication from government officials. He said the PMO reply that came a month later, on February 27, said the request is being processed, and de tails are being collected.

Rao’s suggestions sent to the prime minister on the Kota project contained, apart from technical details on cutting costs, a proposal that an independent team be appointed to review the project.

BUREAUCRATIC NIGHTMARE

But the PMO sending his suggestions as `grievance’ to DAE has put the top nuclear scientist in a bureaucratic nightmare.The PMO’s communications were sent to NFC, Hyderabad, where Rao worked, and his superiors have turned the matter into `staff grievance’ and have been seeking explanations from Rao.

In a series of communications, Rao tried to explain that he did not have any personal grievance.

“I am a successful officer and I have been awarded with DAE group achievement award for indigenisation associated work. My feedback given to the PMO which is converted as my grievance is not aimed at any individual,“ the scientist wrote in one of his attempts to explain himself. However, DAE has not relented and on February 10, Rao received a letter from the Grievance Redressal Committee that reminded him his job was limited to helping in the maintenance of NFC.et clip

“As an organisation, we will follow the process. As he is a staff member, it is being treated as a staff grievance and is being looked into,“ S Goverdhan Rao, deputy chief executive of NFC, told ET.

Dandriyal, who’s still awaiting a full reply from PMO, said, “It will be very difficult for people from the system to come out and expose corruption and inefficiency if there is no mechanism to protect them.“

Corrupt officers block PM Modi’s transparency drive

sunday gaurdians 8th march 1

 

They are working to ensure that the UPA’s efforts to water down the impact of the RTI Act get revived rather than rolled back.

MADHAV NALAPAT New Delhi | 7th Mar 2015

Senior officials say that Prime Minister Narendra Modi has called for a review by the Cabinet Secretariat of the indiscriminate way in which documents have been classified as secret. The intention behind the exercise is “to ensure greater transparency in the functioning of government offices, in order to promote disclosure and probity”. Although as yet the Modi government has succeeded in bringing to justice only a small handful of corrupt officials during the UPA period, the rest of the tainted flock are nervous at a possible intensification of Prime Minister Modi’s quest for transparency and accountability. They are therefore working to ensure that the opaque governance system that is a relic of the British colonial era, continues into the foreseeable future. In particular, they are working to ensure through appropriate notings and interventions that the 2011-13 efforts by the Manmohan Singh government to water down the impact of the Right to Information Act get revived rather than rolled back.

Acting on the overall directions of the Prime Minister, units of the Delhi police have uncovered several “corporate espionage rings” operating within key economic and other ministries. Senior officials in sync with PM Modi’s desire for clean and transparent government say that relevant agencies have since 2011 had knowledge of these networks, but that the corporate spies were allowed to continue unimpeded “because of protection from the highest political quarters”. Interestingly, some of these espionage networks ensured the flow (to selected media channels) of information stolen from ministry files, so as to generate negative (albeit factual) stories about rival groups and hostile individuals, including senior officials as well as ministers. Some of the rings “functioned also as the private detective agencies of friendly officials and politicians, securing for them dirt on their opponents, which could be leaked to friendly journalists or used for purposes of blackmail”.

For the media, accuracy and public interest trump the motivation of sources in revealing information, hence their case for publishing material stolen from government files by corporate espionage networks. Interestingly, police and other agencies have yet to question more than a third of the individuals known (from preliminary investigations) to have guided such spy rings, or who regularly accessed information gathered by them. However, an official said that these individuals have not been excused, but will be questioned later, after the huge volume of information secured during the raids gets processed by the police. Interestingly, an official privy to the documents said that “more than three-fourths of them should not have been classified as secret”. According to him, such documents ought to have been placed on the websites of the concerned ministries, and that to do so would have been in the public interest.

“Keeping information secret, which ought to have been in the public domain, ensures that bribes get paid to reveal such data, and also serves to protect corrupt officials”, a senior official warned, adding that “more than 90% of classified information is such as to serve the public interest better by disclosure rather than by secrecy”. A senior official said that specific measures to increase transparency have been suggested, which include:

(a) the placing of draft bills intended for introduction in Parliament on ministry websites, in order to generate the views of civil society on such prospective legislation;

(b) televising or live streaming of the discussions held by Parliamentary committees on important issues and the placing of minutes of proceedings in the public domain;

(c) placing on relevant official websites all decisions of the Union Cabinet as well as the notes relied upon in the taking of such decisions;

(d) making public the assets of officials, and making them fill out a declaration of assets each year for themselves and their family members, with penalties for non-disclosure. In particular, several officials claim that their offspring win scholarships to expensive international institutions of higher learning. Full details of how costs of stay and study abroad of dependents of decision-makers are being met would assist in accountability, officials unhappy at the non-disclosure of such information say;

(e) making public via ministry websites the file movements both within each ministry as well as between ministries, so as to keep a check on inefficiency or possible collateral motives;

(f) placing information given in public tenders on relevant websites, after technical and financial bids have been opened, so as to keep a check on possible scams based on “fixing” of criteria;

(g) strengthening the ambit of the Right to Information Act and set mandatory punishments for ignoring timelines for the handing over of information, as well as ensure that only those committed to transparency would be considered for the posts of Information Commissioners.

Senior officials say that except for a coterie of corrupt officials and their accessories, others in the government would welcome greater transparency. Owing to the widespread prevalence of graft in India, disclosure of information has much less of a downside than a continuation of the British colonial era fetish of official secrecy, one of the many features of colonial rule embraced in totality by Jawaharlal Nehru and his successors. These officials say that they are hopeful that Prime Minister Modi will succeed in his mission of ensuring transparent government. They would also like the Cabinet Secretariat to initiate workshops and courses on “open government” for officials at all levels, so as to rid them of the cult of secrecy and a mistrust in the good sense of the general public, both of which are holdovers from the British colonial era, but which still remain embedded within the governance system in India. “Prime Minister Modi can rely on the ‘honest majority’ of officials to ensure that he succeeds in his efforts at bringing the governance system in India on par with those in other major democracies, rather than resemble those of authoritarian states,” according to a senior official.

 Comments –

Prabhu Dandriyal • 4 minutes ago

Dear Friends, I have received RTI reply from PMO, South block, New Delhi in respect of my online RTI request in respect of PMO website regarding Interact with Honorable Prime Minister of India. It is observed that when citizen of India submitted some feedback, suggestions to improve system or information regarding misuse of fund & power by authorities, PMO officials are taking these inputs as personal grievances of individuals rather than taking inputs in national interest. The PMO officials forwarding that information directly send to concern organizations without concealing the name of individuals, it may be affect the carrier of individual or authorities can target to harass the individual.

No doubt Modi ji intention is clean the corruption from government but Modi Ji failed to give an exemplary punishment to any officials for his act of corruption and the result was the failure in Delhi election.

Common man only believes in instant results and therefore people and intellectuals are sending n number corruption inputs but no action is reflected in day by day governance of Modi ji.

Another major massage received by these corrupt officers that new NDA government is also manageable by the decision of Dr V K Saraswat appointment in Niti Ayog, He is well known corrupt person in MoD, this on the basis of RTIreply from MoD that vigilance cases are pending against him, IB was not given clearance when he tried for post of PSA in UPA era. UPA honest Defence minister approved CBI inquiry against him, he also ordered special audit by CGDA and plenty of anonymous letter are lying with material facts with NSA/IB/Min of Defence but Modi ji not aware about this, only God knows

Concard • 5 hours ago

The biggest threat to the country is the corrupt Bureaucrats who have been nurtured by Congress and their cronies for decades. All the scams have the imprint of bureaucrats, without them scams can’t take place smoothly. Modi should reign in our bureaucracy which has already got the distinction of being one of the most corrupt in the world. If it wasn’t for honest bureaucrat like Vinod Rai, we would have never known about corrupt dumb impotent Manmohan who let the coal scam happen while washing the toilets of Sonia Gandhi.

Jitendra Desai • 3 hours ago

Good move.But this government needs to sack, punish, transfer more crooks out of Delhi to make it a descent place to work and govern. Many in the babudom are there simply to stop or at best delay the work for personal gains. Delhi of Congress rule has been resembling Delhi of Mogul era. So full of deceit, intrigue and palace politics with no concern for the people at large.Government is moving in the right direction by shifting the focus of activities to the states. If this continues for some time, the sources of funding may dry up for the good. GOD SPEED to all these!

 ashok759 • 11 hours ago

I don’t watch TV much, but I think instances of editors waving sheaves of classified documents, the more sensitive portions suitably highlighted, are now a thing of the past. It had started looking like a fish market when CWG was at its peak.

RTI Reply from PMO

Dear Friends,

Today I have received RTI reply from PMO, South block, New Delhi  in respect of my online RTI request in respect of PMO website regarding Interact with Honorable Prime Minister of India. It is observed that when citizen of India submitted some feedback, suggestions to improve system or information regarding misuse of fund & power by authorities, PMO officials are taking these inputs as personal grievances of individuals rather than taking inputs in national interest. The PMO officials forwarding that information directly send to concern organizations without concealing the name of individuals, it may be affect the carrier of individual or authorities can target to harass the individual.

It is requested please submit your valuable comments and suggestion on subject matter and regarding handling of RTI’s.

Regards

Prabhu Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur,
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com website www.corruptionindrdo.com

RTI PMO 26 jan 2015

 

RTI Reply by PMO dated 27th Feb 2015 received on 4th March 2015
RTI Reply by PMO dated 27th Feb 2015 received on 4th March 2015