Tag Archives: RTI

Drdo

DRDO have no reply – taken shelter from RTI section 24(1) for unaccountability & delay during Kargil war – More Casualities of Indian Army.

3 Comments

From-                                                                                              Dated : 24-06-12

Rajiv Chauhan;                                                                                                                                                1053/3,Shastri nagar,Meerut(U.P)                                                                          09412628314;09258045938;

To,                                                                                                                                                                              Hon’ble Defence Minister;                                                                                                                           Govt.of India,  New Delhi,

Sub:– DRDO have no reply – taken shelter from RTI section 24(1) for unaccountability &    delay during Kargil war – More Casualities of Indian Army.

Respected Sir,

Former Army Chief V.P.Malik, who led the army during the 1999 Kargil war, has said casualties in the conflict could have been reduced had the DRDO “not come in the way” of acquiring weapon – locating radars. ‘We had one or two incidents particularly on the weapon locating radar. If the DRDO had not come in the way we would have got them before the Kargil war and that would have definitely reduced our casualties’.

My RTI related to know the DRDO scientist / officer accountable and responsible for the delay which caused more casualties of the Indian Army as per the army chief Malik.. But DRDO have no reply – taken shelter from RTI section 24(1) for unaccountability?

I request you to take necessary action against the accountable officer in DRDO responsible for more casualties of Indian Army.

With high regards,

Your,  Sincerely.

(Rajiv Chauhan)

COPY TO THE : 

 1- Hon’ble President of India for kind consideration and necessary action.

2- Hon’ble Prime minister of India for kind consideration and necessary action.

Rajiv Chauhan

FOR DETAIL PL. SEE ENCLOSERS

Kargil RTI

 

 

Drdo

DRDO have no reply – taken shelter from RTI section 24(1) in corruption related cases ?

1 Comment

From-                                                                                           Dated : 20-06-12

Rajiv Chauhan;                                                                                                                   1053/3,Shastri nagar,Meerut(U.P)                                                                 09412628314;09258045938;

 

To,                                                                                                                             Hon’ble Defense Minister;                                                                                    Govt.of India,  New Delhi,

Sub:– DRDO have no reply – taken shelter from RTI section 24(1) in              corruption related cases ?

Respected Sir,

Major irregularities in the purchase of 59,000 bullet –proof jackets for security forces, the Home Ministry findings of the testing conducted by a tainted official at DRDO Chandigarh laboratory. The ministry requested the DRDO for initiating disciplinary proceedings against its scientist R.K.Verma, the joint director at the Terminal Ballistics Research Laboratory in Chandigarh.

My RTI related to know the disciplinary proceeding against R.K.Verma. But DRDO have no reply – taken shelter from RTI section 24(1) in corruption related cases?

However major irregularities find out by the ministry of home, but DRDO disciplinary proceedings result is unknown. May possible to promote Mr. R.K.Verma instead of major punishment with the pecuniary arrangement of the Top corrupt officers / scientist?

I request you to take necessary action as per the Home Ministry with those top scientists responsible to provide shelter during disciplinary proceedings.

With high regards,

Your,  Sincerely.

(Rajiv Chauhan)

COPY TO THE : 

 1- Hon’ble President of India for kind consideration and necessary action.

2- Hon’ble Prime minister of India for kind consideration and necessary action.

Rajiv Chauhan

FOR DETAIL PL. SEE ENCLOSERS

DRDO Bulletproof Jacket Scam
Rajiv's RTI page 1
Rajiv's RTI page 2
DRDO RTI Reply
Drdo

DRDO Scientist recommendation with false information to grant extension of service for a period of two years beyond the age of 60 years; .

4 Comments

Dated : 14-06-12

From-                                                                                                                             Rajiv Chauhan;                                                                                                 1053/3,Shastri nagar,Meerut(U.P)                                        09412628314;09258045938;

 

To,                                                                                                                               Hon’ble Defense Minister;                                                                                    Govt.of India,  New Delhi,

Subject –  DRDO Scientist recommendation with false information to grant extension of service for a period of two years beyond the age of 60 years; .

Respected Sir,

This is not a single example which is put up before you that how the recommendations with false information to grant extension of service for a period of two years beyond the age of 60 years; given by the DRDO HQ.  Is it a misuse of office for misuse of powers or a pecuniary arrangement with involvement of corruption?

Dr.Rao A Subhananda ; Distinguished Scientist, particulars recommended by the DRDO HQ with false information that ‘NO’ any VIGILANCE proceedings are pending or contemplated against the officer, However in a RTI reply it found that a Vigilance proceeding is pending against the scientist. I hereby enclose that annexure with DRDO HQ false information and related RTI information. Both information is contradictory. Which is a right information, Information given by CVC or given by the DRDO HQ?

I request you to take a suitable and necessary action against the responsible officer, who sent the recommendation with false information to the Govt. of India.

With high regards,

Your’s,  Sincerely.

 

(Rajiv Chauhan)

COPY TO THE : 

 1- Hon’ble President of India for kind consideration and necessary action.

2- Hon’ble Prime minister of India for kind consideration and necessary action.

 

Rajiv Chauhan

 

 

 

Drdo

Corrupt Top Scientists of India making undue pressure on complainants of the corruption in DRDO; Ministry of Defense

Leave a comment

Dated : 30-05-12

From-                                                                                                                                                       Rajiv Chauhan                                                                                                                 1053/3,Shastri Nagar                                                                                                            Meerut(U.P)                                                                                        09412628314;09258045938;

To,                                                                                                                                                Hon’ble President of India,                                                                                                 Govt.of India,                                                                                                                            New Delhi

Subject – Corrupt Top Scientists of India making undue pressure on complainants of the corruption in DRDO; Ministry of Defense.

Respected Madam,

A planning by the Corrupt TOP scientist against the complainants of the corruption in DRDO; want to falsely implicate the charges against the complainants; come out from the RTI reply. A high power inquiry committee was formed with a planning to make a pressure to stop the corruption complaints against DRDO. Mr Prabhu regularly pointed the corruption points in DRDO through www.corruptionindrdo.com The Chairman of the High Power Committee was the Husband of a Scientist presently working under the TOP scientist of DRDO. This RTI reply is sufficient example to show that how DRDO, TOP corrupt scientists make undue influence on the complainants of the corruption in DRDO. I hereby enclose my RTI application and its reply before you to take a suitable action to prevent such type of undue influence on the complainants. I will be highly obliged.

With high regards,

Your, Sincerely.

 

 

(Rajiv Chauhan)

RTI Request from Cyber Law Group Formulations & Enforcement Division, GOI
RTI Reply by Department of Information Technology
RTI reply from Department of Technology

 

 

Drdo

CVO / Director (Intelligence & Vigilance) / Add. Director (Intelligence & vigilance) O/o the DRDO; Ministry of Defense involved in corruption to give shelter to corrupt Senior Scientist

5 Comments

From :  

Rajiv Chauhan;
1053/3,Shastri nagar,Meerut(U.P)
09412628314;09258045938;

To,
Mr. Pradeep Kumar,
Central Vigilance Commissioner,
New Delhi;

Subject : CVO / Director (Intelligence & vigilance) / Add. Director (Intelligence & vigilance) O/o the DRDO; Ministry of Defense involved in corruption to give shelter to corrupt senior scientist 

Dear Sir,
I can give you my affidavit whenever you require to put my strong complaint related with the CVO / Director / Add. Director (Intelligence & vigilance); O/o –DRDO that they are working for providing the shelter to the corrupt officers and scientist in DRDO. After having strong evidences they ignored and give the clean chit to the corrupt officers / scientist. This clean chit is used by the corrupt officers and scientist to show their integrity. A lot of honest departmental senior officers and scientist put up complaints against the corrupt DRDO scientist but this Directorate of Intelligence and vigilance give the shelter to corrupt persons and recommended the action against the honest officers and scientist. This is a very good joke in your corruption preventive department. Can you scrutinize the complaints investigated by this CVO / directorate (Intelligence & vigilance) of DRDO? If yes than a lot of honest officers / scientists / NGO’s and individuals will give you strong evidences related high level corruption in DRDO, Ministry of Defense.
Secondly , however RTI is not your jurisdiction but a lot of the RTI file before CPIO, o/o DRDO to take the corruption related information’s, but CPIO never give the corruption related information to the RTI activist and get sheltered from 24(1) of the RTI act. If you can take the notice on RT I applications related with corruption than definitely you can get evidences against the corruption.
Thirdly, a lot of the scientist are involving in spy the researches and leak the classified information’s. This Directorate (intelligence and vigilance) O/o – DRDO is fully aware about these things but after that they are given the shelter to the corrupts.
Fourthly, I put up more than 100 complaints scrutinized by the (intelligence and vigilance) O/o – DRDO and give shelter to the corrupt offices / scientists—-
1- Scientist ’F’ O/o-DRDO; Neelam Bhalla complaint for recruitment of Swati Srivastava Scientist D/o-Mr Arun Kumar, Director O/o- DRDO HQ.
2- Senior Administrative Officer, O/o- DRDO Mr Prakash Singh , more than 40 corruption related complaints.
3- My corruption related more than 20 complaints against RAC OF DRDO.& others.
4- Spy of the research related complaints by the honest DRDO Scientists.
5- More than 50 corruption related complaints through www.drdocorruption.com
TOP senior scientists of the DRDO directly related with corruption, so that CVO / Directorate (intelligence and vigilance) O/o – DRDO give the shelter to his senior involved in corruption.
I request you to re-investigate the all corruption related cases of the DRDO investigated by the CVO / Directorate (Intelligence & vigilance) of DRDO through another investigating agency or directly by the CVC. I assure you that you will find out the heavy corruption in DRDO. I will be highly obliged for your kind consideration and necessary action.

Regards,

 

 

Rajiv Chauhan

COPY TO THE :
1- Hon’ble President of India for kind consideration and necessary action.
2- Hon’ble Prime minister of India for kind consideration and necessary action.
3- Hon’ble Home minister of India for kind consideration and necessary action.
4- Hon’ble Defense Minister of India for kind consideration and necessary action.
5- Hon’ble CIC of India for kind consideration and necessary action.
6- Director, Central Bureau of Investigation, for kind consideration and necessary action.
7-Director, Intelligence Bureau, for kind consideration and necessary action.,

 

 

Rajiv Chauhan

Drdo

PMO, NSA shielding CAG-indicted NTRO – The Pioneer

Leave a comment

SUNDAY, 18 MARCH 2012 00:27 J GOPIKRISHNAN | NEW DELHI

While the Prime Minister’s Office and the National Security Advisor are trying to hush up the wrongdoings by powerful technical intelligence agency, NTRO, by not tabling the CAG report in Parliament, the CAG response to an RTI query confirms blatant violations in purchase and recruitments in the sensitive organisation.

The CAG submitted its report to the President in mid-February 2011. As per tradition, this should have been tabled in Parliament in the next session. But the Government has not mustered the courage to table it even after more than a year.

The Government may attract breach of privilege notices from parliamentarians as it is going to submit the report to the Supreme Court on March 19. All the CAG reports are first placed in Parliament, which makes it public.

This will be the first time the Government will bypass Parliament and submit a CAG report to the Supreme Court. The SC had ordered for production of the controversial CAG report in a sealed cover on a petition filed by former joint secretary of National Technical Research Organisation VK Mittal.

“We have noticed lack of transparency and non-compliance of rules and procedures in procurement of systems/stores/equipment and deficient procurement management resulting in cases of excess payment/wasteful expenditure/loss to exchequer,” said the CAG’s office in the RTI reply sought by whistleblower VK Mittal.

“We have noticed cases of appointment of ineligible candidates and lack of transparency in recruitment of regular employees also in NTRO…. We have noticed lack of transparency in appointment of contractual employees… We have noticed instances of misuse of official position,” added CAG’s office.

CAG decision to audit on NTRO affairs in December 2009 was vehemently objected by then National Security Advisor MK Naryanan and later overruled by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. NTRO, which was formed after the Kargil war, works under NSA who reports to the Prime Minister.

The CAG submitted its performance audit on the NTRO, the first such audit report on an intelligence organisation in mid-February 2011. The report, according to sources, exposed the style of functioning and rampant corruption in secret service organisation, nepotism and siphoning money in the name of national security. The findings of the CAG were pointing directly towards the “arbitrary decisions” of then NSA and higher officials in the PMO, said sources.

Among the major findings, the blatant violation of UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle) purchases by manipulating the decisions of Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS). The CAG report, a copy of which is also with National Security Advisor Shiv Shankar Menon over the past one year, has indicted former NTRO Chairman KVSS Prasad Rao and its Advisor MS Vijayaraghavan for misdeeds in several purchases.

The CAG’s Special Audit on Performance and Finance of NTRO has revealed that the agency, in a bid to favour the Israeli vendors, never informed the CCS on adding extra cost of Rs 150 crore. The CCS sanctioned Rs 300 crore for purchase and NTRO manipulated the accounting procedures and hiked the purchase amount to Rs 450 crore.

More over CAG found that the entire such purchase to favour the Israeli vendor lead to inferior quality and the entire UAVs are still non-operational.

The CAG in its report on the functioning of NTRO found that as many as 143 posts in the sensitive organisation were filled not according the procedures and observed severe nepotism in such postings. The CAG decided to audit when Mittal, who quit from the organisation and complained on illegalities.

After Government hushed up the CAG report by not tabling before Parliament, he approached Supreme Court through noted lawyer Prashant Bhushan. In a recent hearing, Justices HL Dattu and CK Prasad directed Solicitor General Rohinton Nariman to submit the controversial CAG report on March 19 in a sealed cover. Several legal experts point out that non-tabling of CAG report before Parliament and presenting it in a sealed cover before court may invite breach of privilege by Parliamentarians.

Drdo

DRDO passes its expertise to NTRO – I

Leave a comment

All the stalwarts of DRDO who were master of manipulating government funds, misinterpretation of government rules having expertise in inculcating a negative attitude towards self reliance and always planning commission and omission through bulk purchases were shifted to NTRO an agency established by the government after KARGIL debacle. The modus operandi of DRDO & NTRO experts/bosses are twin in appearance, if CBI enquires in depth the enquiry will reveal that the entire procurement/ recruitment system are identical.

Deccan Herald

Under veil of secrecy, elint outfit gobbles funds

Chandan Nandy, Bangalore, Mar 20, 2012, DHNS:

Less spying and more misuse of resources in elite security set-up

Eight years after its creation, the National Technical Research Organisation (NTRO), which was established on the lines of Britain’s Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) and America’s National Security Agency (NSA), is in a mess. 

 Far from performing the responsibilities it was entrusted with after it was found that the country’s security establishment lacked effective technical/communications intelligence capabilities, the NTRO is battling serious allegations of corruption.And the lid has been blown off from within: a former NTRO scientist, V K Mittal, has been able to fight his way through the webs of secrecy and official pressure and intimidation to force the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) to institute a special audit which the Supreme Court is now seized of.According to one estimate, misappropriation of funds in the NTRO is to the tune of Rs 800 crore, which was alloted Rs 9,832 crore in the 2011-12 financial year. The organisation spends approximately 62 per cent of the money on purchase of equipment and maintains a secret service fund of about Rs 36 crore. Most of the procurements were through single tenders.According to a February 29, 2012 CAG reply to Mittal’s RTI application, the audit body “noticed lack of transparency and non-compliance of rules and procedures in procurement of systems/stores/equipment and deficient procurement management, resulting in cases of excess payment/wasteful expenditure/loss to the exchequer.”Investigations by Deccan Herald revealed that despite objections from the chief of communications intelligence, senior NTRO officers procured satellite communication terminals worth Rs 18 crore in early 2009 from a blacklisted company, Singapore Technology.

The previous year (May 2008), Mittal, as head of NTRO’s Centre for Communications Applications (CCA) wrote to the then NTRO chairman K V S S Prasad Rao claiming that the use of satellite communication (SATCOM) equipment on board unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) was “never a part of the original request for proposal (RFP) or tender” and “hence no technical evaluation was carried out” at any stage by his division.

Although the SATCOM equipment were to be procured from two Israeli companies, Israeli Aerospace Industry (IAI) and ELTA, visits by CCA officers to these firms in Israel yielded little. “In all meetings (at least four times in Tel Aviv) CCA has been requesting IAA/ELTA to give details of the antenna and other systems associated with SATCOM onboard the UAV. Despite our concerted efforts and repeated demands, IAI/ELTA have refused to part with necessary information,” documents in possession of Deccan Herald say.

Alarmingly, the trials of the SATCOM for UAVs, instead of being carried out in India were undertaken in Australia despite strong objections on the ground that the tests should be carried out in Indian conditions. “The offer of trials outside India was firmly turned down by CCA due to various technical reasons in July-August 2007. Hence the rationale for trials oustide India, despite our strong opposition is not clear to us,” the document of May 9, 2008 says.

The main reason why trials (which were to be witnessed by representatives of the Army, Air Force and the Navy) in Australia were not considered feasible was the IAI/ELTA had provided incomplete information about the antenna proposed for SATCOM onboard UAVs. Besides, it was found that the antenna was “suboptimal” and “did not meet the requisite standard of radiation”, and that power amplifiers required modifications “to be able to meet digital modulation requirements.”

Documents in Deccan Herald’s possession suggest that the Israeli companies failed to demonstrate any SATCOM specialisation for the equipments, including electronic intelligence payload for the UAVs, a project that cost Rs 40 crore.

It was after Mittal was served a memo by the then NTRO adviser (in the rank of additional secretary) M S Vijayaraghavan for objecting to the SATCOM equipment deal that he quit the NTRO and blew the whistle on the goings-on in the country’s communications intelligence organisation. Subsequent internal inquiries and special audits by the CAG in January 2010 (the NTRO was outside the purview of any government audit when it was formed) led to the chargesheeting of seven officers.

A retired senior intelligence officer blamed “those in control of the country’s security apparatus” for NTRO’s “miserable condition.”

Under the scanner

* Internet monitoring system (Rs 30 cr)
* Information processing software (Rs 5 cr)
* Satellite communication monitoring system (Rs 30 cr)
* Civil works contract in Dehradun (Rs 40 cr)        
* Electronic intelligence payload (Rs 30 cr)

Uncategorized

Serious lapses in NTRO equipment buying: CAG

1 Comment

Serious lapses in NTRO equipment buying: CAG

by Danish Raza Mar 12, 2012 First Post

New Delhi: While the Comptroller and Auditor General’s  (CAG) special audit report of National Technical Research Organisation (NTRO)remains a top secret, the auditing authority has officially admitted it found serious lapses in recruitment of regular employees and procurement of equipment by NTRO.

“We have noticed cases of appointment of ineligible candidates and lack of transparency in recruitment of regular employees in NTRO,” the office of the Directorate General of Audit (central expenditure), an arm of CAG, said in response to RTI application filed by V.K. Mittal

The findings of NTRO audit have not been made public.The report has not been placed before the Parliament. The agency is a highly specialised technical intelligence gathering agency.

Responding to a query on the types of irregularities which were detected in procurement of systems/ equipment, the auditing body said, “We have noticed lack of transparency and non- compliance of rules in procurement of systems/ equipment and deficient procurement management resulting in cases of excess payment/ wasteful expenditure to exchequer.”

According to the RTI reply dated February 29, 2012, a copy of which is with Firstpost, CAG has also noticed instances of misuse of official position. CAG has also informed Mittal that neither NTRO nor the National Security Advisor (NSA) has filed any action taken report based on special audit report- a first for any intelligence agency in India.

In other words, NSA received the audit report but took no action based on its findings.

“The fact that the CAG has detected bungling in NTRO but nothing was to curb it, calls for greater accountability in NTRO and other similar bodies,” said Mittal.

The NTRO, created in 2004, is a technical intelligence wing of the government of India. It reports directly to the NSA.

Mittal, a former scientist with NTRO and one of the founding members of the organization, exposed a series of irregularities in the purchase of defence equipment in NTRO. He wrote to the NSA and the Prime Minister’s Office about lack of transparency in procuring of equipment, including unmanned aerial vehicles, by the NTRO.

Last year, Mittal filed a petition in Delhi High Court on the issue. The High Court refused to interfere in the matter directing the CAG to proceed in accordance with law.

Mittal then moved Supreme Court which, in August last year, issued notices to the PMO, Central Vigilance Commission, NTRO and CAG.

In the next hearing on March 19, the government has to submit the auditor’s report in the Supreme Court before the bench of justice H L Dattu and C K Prasad.

Uncategorized

DNA Exclusive: CAG nails NTRO; NSA sits on report

Leave a comment

DNA Exclusive: CAG nails NTRO; NSA sits on report

Published: Monday, Mar 5, 2012, 9:15 IST
By Saikat Datta | Place: New Delhi | Agency: DNA

An aggressive audit of the country’s premier technical spying agency, the National Technical Research Organisation (NTRO), by the CAG — the first time an intelligence agency has been audited — has revealed large-scale irregularities, corruption and several instances of official position/s being misused.

The report is unlikely to be made public or even placed before Parliament, but is bound to raise questions on National Security Adviser (NSA) Shiv Shankar Menon’s role as he has not taken any action on the report for months. The NTRO does not come under any ministry and it reports directly to the NSA.

India is one of the few democracies where Parliament has no supervisory control over intelligence agencies. The report comes at a time when there is tremendous churning within the intelligence community with calls for greater accountability and transparency.

The CAG summarised its findings while replying to former NTRO joint secretary VK Mittal’s query under RTI seeking details of the audit. It says the CAG has “noticed cases of appointment of ineligible candidates” confirming fears that the agency has been flouting rules while recruiting senior people.

A source told DNA that this has resulted in people being recruited based on their “connections” rather than merit. In fact, IPS officer Jaijeet Singh (Maharashtra cadre) who joined the NTRO last year is probing such cases. So far, five people — either of the rank of joint secretary or director — are under the scanner. The “illegal recruits” include Commander Manoj Modi from the navy, LtCol Sachin Burman, part of the cyber-espionage team, Pramod Prasad, Ruchichandra Srivastava and HS Dhillon.

The CAG found that contractual appointments of senior officers were not transparent. Financial rules were flouted while recruiting Brigadier Anil Malhotra on contract. Malhotra dealt with counter-intelligence and internal security.

The report also talks of several senior officers “misusing” their positions. Chief among them is MS Vijaraghavan, currently the second-in-command in the NTRO.

The fact that he used a prime property in New Delhi’s posh Hauz Khas enclave as his personal residence — rent bills ran into lakhs — left the organisation embarrassed. The CAG recorded several instances of “misuse of official power”, many being committed by Vijayraghavan. Despite all this, he still holds a sensitive post because the government has chosen to ignore the charges against him.

PV Kumar, the present NTRO chairman, too investigated the mess and sent his report to the NSA, Menon. But he has been sitting on both reports for months. And the picture is unlikely to change because neither report would be tabled in Parliament. The reason: the reports are confidential.

The CAG said in an earlier reply, November 28, 2011, under RTI that neither the NTRO nor the NSA has sent any “action-taken” report. DNA has learnt that the CAG has found at least 143 instances of illegal recruitments. It has also found “non-compliance of rules” in procurement of systems and equipment. This means kickbacks could have been part of the several purchases made by NTRO.

The NTRO was set up after the Kargil war to coordinate all technical intelligence efforts. But the organisation has failed to take off because of nepotism and corruption. Even Union home minister P Chidamabaram refused to include the agency in his daily intelligence briefings. The home ministry recently denied it the status of a notified agency that could legally intercept phones and emails of the people of the country.

Drdo

AMU VC committed financial impropriety’

2 Comments

15th January 2012

To
The Defence Minister
Room No -104, South Block
New Delhi – 110011

Reference: a)  Your letter No 1409-VIP/RM/2011 dated 21st March 2011
                       b)  Your letter No 1409-VIP/RM/2236 dated 20th May 2011           
 

Honorable Sir,

The following news was published on Friday, 13th January 2012 Times of India, New Delhi.

‘AMU VC committed financial impropriety’: CBI is believed to have found that AMU VC P K Abdul Azis had committed financial impropriety and knowingly claimed allowances for which he was not entitled.

Sir, Dr Prahlada, VC, DIAT, DRDO has also did same corruption and the RTI reply from JCDA and DRDO Hqrs proved the same then why the similar action is not taken by Ministry of Defence ?

Dr. Prahlada is not only case in DRDO there are so many other senior officials who have committed similar corruption until my RTI was raised. Like Sh S Ravi, Scientist ‘G’, Sh Neeraj Kumar, Scientist ‘D’ etc.

Please find enclosed documentary evidences of above corrupt practices done by DRDO officials for your needful action.

Yours sincere effort is needed to clean the DRDO.

Thanking you

Regards

Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008
Phone – 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
E-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com,  Website –  www.corruptionindrdo.com

Enclosed

  1. RTI reply of JCDA
  2. RTI Reply of DRDO Hqrs in respect of Dr Prahlada, Sh S Ravi, Scietist’ G’ etc
  3. RTI Reply of DRDO Hqrs in respect of Sh. Neeraj Kumar Scientist ‘ D’
  4. DOP,DRDO Hqrs letter for HRA recovery dated 17thAugust 2011
    JCDA RTI Reply
    DRDO Hqrs Reply
    DRDO Qrs RTI Reply 2
    DRDO Hqrs RTI reply in respect of Sh Neeraj Kumar
    Neeraj Kumar HRA Amount

     

    DOP Letter