My RTI Request for expose Fake Experience Certificate issued to Ms Geetha, Scientist ‘D’ , DIPAS, DRDO Daughter of Ex- CC R&D, DRDO Dr W Selvamurthy by Professor Vani Brahmachari, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Center for Biomedical Research, University of Delhi North campus.
RTI requested to know about action taken by honorable minister Smt. Smriti Zubin Irani.
Please the request and reply
Request
1. Certified Copy of remark/note by Minister Smt. Smriti Zubin Irani 2.Present status of representation/complaint 3.Certified Copy of reply received from Delhi University on subject matter. 4.Certified Copy of any other action by HRD on subject matter
Reply against these request by Sh R K Sinha, U/Secy & CPIO, HRD
Reply of Sh R K Sinha, CPIO & U/S, HRD
Fresh RTI with hope that some one can rethink that his son or daughter can also deprive to get fare opportunity by these corrupt practices.
To, 9th September 2014Sh R K Sinha, CPIO,Under Secretary,Room No. 503-BMINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT SHASTRI BHAWAN, RAJENDRA PRASAD ROAD, NEW DELHI – 110 001
Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect my RTI application No. DOHED/R/2014/64019 dated 26.08.2014 and your reply vide F.No.63-6/2014- Desk (U).
Provide the date of receipt of my RTI application No. DOHED/R/2014/64019 dated 26.08.2014
Provide the copy of note sheet of initiated on RTI application no. DOHED/R/2014/64019
Provide the copy of forwarding letter for appropriate action to Delhi University as mentioned in your above mentioned RTI reply.
Provide the copy of if any reply received from Delhi University on subject matter.
In DRDO there is no HR policy, although the post of CC R&D HR and a big HR directorate under him working in DRDO Hqrs but they are working with sole aim and object that how to execute and manage the unethical/ unconstitutional demands of DG, DRDO to all establishment heads.
Generally these demands are to adjust their beloved by any means like Smt. T Chandra Bhanu or Ms Geetha or Ms Swati Srivastva or Ms Dolly Bansal recruitment cases. Some cases come out from the four walls of DRDO but inside DRDO everyone knows this practice is continue carryon in DRDO by so called DRDO,HRD like adjustment of Commander Patel, Ex- SA’s daughter, CEPTAM Chairman’s son, Ex- Scientist ‘G’ in DEAL who was head of HRD, DEAL adjust his son Sh Saket Jain with all farzi certificates.
It is very well proven DRDO HRD can do any dam thing under wish of their AAKAS whether harassment of any individual from class IV employee to Scientist ‘H’. There is no moral exists in DRDO, HRD n numbers of examples available of transfers cases, manipulating in ACR/APAR’s, Awards to incompetents, authentication of false claims, list is too long.
The following case of Sh M R Gupta, TO ‘C’ is a clear cut case of dictatorship of DRDO officials, several years torture now Sh M R Gupta become chronic depression case.
Sh M R Gupta joined as JSA-II in 1979 in GTRE, DRDO, Bangalore, transferred to IRDE, Dehradun and subsequently joined DEAL as SSA in October 1987.
Up to 1986 his ACR’s was very good and enjoyed regular growth, but the day when then Director, IRDE Dr O P Nijhawan raised his eyebrow and put him in hit list, the bad days started and Sh M R Gupta’s service journey till date exposes the DRDO HR policy.
His 1987 ACR reflects the real bossism of Mr O P Nijhawan number dropped to 62
As IETE graduate Sh M R Gupta applied for the post of Assistant executive engineer in I & B through UPSC and got selected but Dr O P Nijhawan not supplied his 1987 ACR so he was deprived to get post.
Dr. O P Nijhawan’s effect also passed to DEAL and it was always made confirm that any advantage should not passed to Sh M R Gupta,
Sh M R Gupta qualified 9 times LDCE examination of Scientist ‘B’, the RTI revealed that RAC maintained the boss wishes. No one imagine the act of RAC officials.
Sh M R Gupta‘s ACR/ APAR of 1995 and 96 was found blank.
The 2004 ACR/APAR was reviewed by Sh Y P Sehgal, Ex Sc ‘G’ illegally as Sh M R Gupta was never worked with him and put adverse remark “ Onedisciplinary case is with DRDO Hqrs” and remark was duly approved by the Director, Sh Ashok Sen and it was not even communicated to Sh M R Gupta.
DRDO having very common scenarios that if one official is in hit list then all chamchas never leave any chance to fix him to make happy the boss.
In case of Sh M R Gupta same thing happened, several attempts were done to harm, Dr. B S Jassal throw his wife’s medical bill for unforeseen reason and exchanged heat argument, in those argument frustrated Sh M R Gupta told him that I will jumped from the building, very next movement the explanation call with initiation of disciplinary action raised against him.
In 2004 Sh Mahakar Singh, Sc ‘G’ also demonstrated the extreme loyalty and one incident he scrimmage with Sh M R Gupta in his office room, next moment the room was sealed and an ION was served and an inquiry was constituted in a hurry and stage was set for dismiss Sh M R Gupta. By grace of God Sh M R Gupta approached local police and case was registered, subsequently after lower court to high court and again to lower court Sh Mahakar Singh rendered his apology in front of Session Judge, Dehradun and matter was closed.
This is not a single case, the HR policy ingest lot of DRDO officials by heart attack, High blood pressure, increasing number of bye passes, inserting stunts, depressions or exodus.
You can rate DRDO HR policy 5 stars, 4 stars, 3 stars, 2 stars or 1 star after going through the following papers.
MR. M R Gupta’s 1987’s ACRMR M R Gupta ACR 1987Amazing score card of LDCE, RAC can anyone believe the DRDO HR policy
Fast act of Sh Ashok Sen if he was right the why Sh Mahakar Singh rendered his apology in court for same incidentThe Sh Ashok Sen’s white washing team Sh.P C Sharma, CAO, Dr.B.S. Jassal, Sc ‘F’, Sh K.Sivakumar, Sc ‘F’, Sf Ajay Malik, Sc ‘E’Sh Mahakar Singh rendered his apology in courtSh Mahakar Singh rendered his apology in court
Health condition of Mr M R Gupta or DRDO HR policy
To 3rd June 2014
Smt. Smriti Zubin Irani.
Minister of Human Resource Development.
Shastri Bhawan, C-Wing, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Road,
New Delhi -110001
Subject: Fake Experience Certificate issued from Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Centre for Bio-medical Research North Campus, Delhi University
Honorable Madam,
Please accept our heartiest congratulation for assuming charge of the Ministry of Human Resource Development, it a great responsibility and challenge for you to maintain the falling standard of our higher education. Hope you will take it to the highest standard.
Please find enclosed letter in which I have submitted a complaint to Prof. Dinesh Singh, Vice-Chancellor Delhi University on 7th December 2013 by Speed Post regarding “Fake Experience Certificate issued from Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Centre for Biomedical Research North Campus, Delhi University” with evidences.
On 26th Feb 2014 an RTI request was filled to The Deputy Registrar (Information & CPIO) Delhi University, to know about the action taken by Vice-Chancellor Delhi University, surprising I have received a reply that office of Vice-Chancellor Delhi University not received my letter.
Now I am again enclosing this letter for your good office with expectation that as our Prime Minister is committed to eradicate corruption, in same line you will also take this high profile corruption, this type of corruption depriving the genuine honest talents for getting their due credentials. Ms S Geetha, daughter of ex Chief Controller, DRDO Dr W Selvamurthy submitted an experience certificate issued from Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Centre for Biomedical Research North Campus, Delhi University, for the post of Scientist ‘C’ in DRDO. The signature on certificate is of PROF. VANI BRAHMACHARI. Photocopy of RTI reply from Registrar, Delhi University in respect of said experience certificate that PROF. VANI BRAHMACHARI denied having ever worked with anyone named Ms S Geetha.
It is requested to give appropriate directive to Prof. Dinesh Singh, Vice-Chancellor Delhi University to investigate the case and fix the culprits.
Enclosed – My Letter to Prof. Dinesh Singh, Vice-Chancellor Delhi University dated 7th December 2013
To 7th December 2013Prof. Dinesh Singh,Vice-Chancellor32, Chhatra Marg, Delhi University,Delhi -7
Subject: Request for enquiry of fake experience certificate issued fromDr.B.R.Ambedkar Centre for Biomedical Research North Campus, Delhi University
Sir,
It is observed that Ms S Geetha, submitted an experience certificate issued from Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Centre for Biomedical Research North Campus, Delhi University, for the post of Scientist ‘C’ in DRDO. The signature on certificate is of PROF. VANI BRAHMACHARI.
Photocopy of experience certificate is enclosed herewith for your ready reference, which has been obtained from recruitment assessment center, DRDO by RTI request.
Photocopy of Ms S Geetha’s application is also enclosed herewith for your ready reference in which she mentioned that she worked as research assistant for 38 days in Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Centre for Biomedical Research North Campus, Delhi University and received amount @ Rs 5000/month.
Photocopy of RTI reply from Registrar, Delhi University in respect of said experience certificate is enclosed herewith for your ready reference. In this reply PROF. VANI BRAHMACHARI denied having ever worked with anyone named Ms S Geetha.
It is requested that please set an enquiry as per University Rules and regulation to find out the truth and punish the culprits so that this scientific & technocrat mafia who are working to oblige each other and thereby fooling the countrymen, stop their corrupt practices. The deserving and bright candidates consequently loose the opportunity to serve the nation.
Ms S Geetha is daughter of ex Chief Controller, DRDO Dr W Selvamurthy. Recently on 29thOctober 2013 Defence Minister recommended CBI inquiry against top DRDO officials and Dr W Selvamurthy is one of them. The recommendedCBI inquiry is for investigating the corrupt practices prevailing in RAC (Recruitment & Assessment Center) of DRDO. Ms S Geetha was also recruited direct as scientist ‘C’ with criminal conspiracy.
It is also requested that please observe closely the associations of your faculties with DRDO in various projects and their participation as experts in recruitments and project review committee.
1. Ms Geetha experience Certificate issued by PROF. VANI BRAHMACHARI 2. RTI reply by Registrar Delhi University
RTI Reply from RAC DRDO in respect of Ms Geetha experience certificatereply from Registrar, Delhi University in respect of Mrs S Geetha’s experience certificate
To 26th Feb 2014The Deputy Registrar (Information & CPIO)
32, Chhatra Marg, Delhi University,
Delhi -110007
Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of my letter to Prof. Dinesh Singh, Vice-Chancellor dated 7th December 2013. Regarding – Request for enquiry of fake experience certificate issued from Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Centre for Biomedical Research North Campus, Delhi University. Copy of letter is enclosed for ready reference.
Please provide the date of receiving of above said letter.
Please provide the copy of noting of Prof. Dinesh Singh, Vice-Chancellor on above letter.
Present status of request letter.
If any reply received from PROF. VANI BRAHMACHARI certify copy of reply.
If any enquiry committee was constituted then name of chairman & members.
If no action is taken by Prof. Dinesh Singh, Vice-Chancellor then copy of closer comment
The information sought in this RTI Application is pertaining to allegations of corruption and as such not exempted u/s 24(1) of the RTI Act.
An IPO of Rs. 10/- as application fee (IPO No.17F549249)
1- Copy my letter to Prof. Dinesh Singh, Vice-Chancellor dated 7th December 2013.
2- IPO of Rs. 10/- as application fee (IPO No.17F549249)
RTI Reply from Registrar, Delhi University in respect of Ms Geetha experience certificatereply from Registrar, Delhi University in respect of Mrs S Geetha’s experience certificate
To 7th December 2013Prof. Dinesh Singh,Vice-Chancellor 32, Chhatra Marg, Delhi University,Delhi -7
Subject: Request for enquiry of fake experience certificate issued from Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Centre for Biomedical Research North Campus, Delhi University
Sir,
It is observed that Ms S Geetha, submitted an experience certificate issued from Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Centre for Biomedical Research North Campus, Delhi University, for the post of Scientist ‘C’ in DRDO. The signature on certificate is of PROF. VANI BRAHMACHARI.
Photocopy of experience certificate is enclosed herewith for your ready reference, which has been obtained from recruitment assessment center, DRDO by RTI request.
Photocopy of Ms S Geetha’s application is also enclosed herewith for your ready reference in which she mentioned that she worked as research assistant for 38 days in Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Centre for Biomedical Research North Campus, Delhi University and received amount @ Rs 5000/month.
Photocopy of RTI reply from Registrar, Delhi University in respect of said experience certificate is enclosed herewith for your ready reference. In this reply PROF. VANI BRAHMACHARI denied having ever worked with anyone named Ms S Geetha.
It is requested that please set an enquiry as per University Rules and regulation to find out the truth and punish the culprits so that this scientific & technocrat mafia who are working to oblige each other and thereby fooling the countrymen, stop their corrupt practices. The deserving and bright candidates consequently loose the opportunity to serve the nation.
Ms S Geetha is daughter of ex Chief Controller, DRDO Dr W Selvamurthy. Recently on 29th October 2013 Defence Minister recommended CBI inquiry against top DRDO officials and Dr W Selvamurthy is one of them. The recommendedCBI inquiry is for investigating the corrupt practices prevailing in RAC (Recruitment & Assessment Center) of DRDO. Ms S Geetha was also recruited direct as scientist ‘C’ with criminal conspiracy.
It is also requested that please observe closely the associations of your faculties with DRDO in various projects and their participation as experts in recruitments and project review committee.
1. Ms Geetha experience Certificate issued by PROF. VANI BRAHMACHARI 2. RTI reply by Registrar Delhi University
Copy of experience certificate issued by PROF. VANI BRAHMACHARIReply of RTI from Registrar, Delhi University in respect of Mrs S Geetha’s experience certificate
The main objectives of the RTI Act are – To promote transparency and accountability in the working of every public authority and
To set up a practical regime for giving citizens access to information that is under the control of public authorities.
RTI Act 2005 was introduced to make the government machinery transparent and enhanced the accountability for good governance.
Right to Information and has been given the status of a fundamental right under Article 19(1) of the Constitution. Article 19 (1) under which every citizen has freedom of speech and expression and have the right to know how the government works, what role does it play, what are its functions and so on.
The Act confers right to the citizens to know as to how the taxpayer’s money is being spent by the Government.
Right to Information Act empowers every citizen to seek any information, take notes, extracts or certified copies of documents or records, and take certified samples of material.
DRDO although governed by Indian constitution and draw salary from central government funds.
But decisions are autonomous without accountability. They all are self style generals, they have own rules and rule implantations in own terms & conditions, but when succumbed to injury look for RM for protection and ask protection in the name of secrecy.
Like when an RTI revealed that induction of Grade Pay – Rs 4800 without approval of finance ministry now question of recovery of Rs 24 Cr is big crisis for DRDO, several court cases are facing by DRDO, almost 665 technical officers are busy to tackle the recovery issue.
DRDO management to hide their irresponsible act, making arrangements for reassessment for these technical officers. Please imagine the money involvement and man hour wastage.
The present Honorable Defence Minister has tried his level best and convinced DRDO officers/ employees to fall in the line and follow the constitutional provisions.
Honorable Defence Minister has take prompt action as per rule:-
Not granted extension to Dr V K Sarswat
Suspended Dr Arun Kumar, DOP two hours before his retirement day.
Charge sheeted to Dr. S M Veerabhadrappa just after retirement.
Node to enquiry for Dr W Selvamurthy, Ex CC R&D, Ph D in Yoga, Ms S Geetha, Ms Swati Srivastva, Mrs T Chandra banu, Scientist ‘F’
Charge Sheeted Dr A K Tyagi, ex CPIO, DRDO Hqr
Protected whistle blower Sh Prakash Singh, Senior Admin Officer-I
These well known decisions are in the right direction and has encourage the common people to identify incompetent, corrupt official , non performers etc of DRDO Labs across the India. So this cancer of corruption, nepotism, casteism can be treated in first stage.
DRDO has made it mockery of RTI Act – 2005. There are several examples in CIC decision; “ The Commission has taken a consistent view that notwithstanding the fact that DRDO is an exempted organization, this exemption applies only in respect of scientific/technical matters and not in respect of establishment matters.”
And best part is this that after CIC stands, DRDO went Honorable High Court for wasting precious poor tax payer’s money. Common man cannot digest who give power to these corrupt officers for saving their own skin they are using public money.
In case of DMSRDE, DRDO Lab Kanpur, some RTI were placed to expose the corrupt practices following in the Lab. As usual practice of RTI cell DRDO all were denied and after thoroughly and specifically made first appeal force to think first appellate authority for provide requested informations.
RTI cell DRDO intends to disclose informations. However, the RTI cell at Lab level put the sundry things under schedule-II exemptions. DRDO has protected its corrupt officials under exemption clause in the name of secrecy.
Please find enclosed copy of FAX addressed to Director, DMSRDE, KANPUR Letter No RTI/02/2091 /F /2013/0139.0140,0141,0142,0144 dated 27th September 2013 signed by Sh Bishan Singh, Astt. Director, RTI Cell, For First Appellate Authority.
On the direction of Honorable Defence Minister, a high level committee was constituted under chairmanship of Dr. V. Bhujanga Rao, DS & CC R&D (NS&IC), members were Dr. G Malakondaiah, DS & CC R&D (HR & M), Lt Gen Anoop Malhotra, CC R&D (R&M and Implementation), Brig Ajay Gupta, Vigilance Director and Dr. A K Singh, DOP to find out the truth about the allegations of Sh Prakash Singh, Ex Senior Admin Officer, LESTECH, Metcalf House, Delhi. (Copy of CVO MOD enclosed)
What are the allegations?
The recruitment of Ms Swati Srivastava as Scientist ‘B’ was totally manipulated by Dr Arun Kumar, DOP,OS, Scientist ‘H’.(Ex)
The recruitment of Ms Geetha as Scientist ‘C’ was totally manipulated by Dr W Selvamurthy, DS & CC R&D (LS & IC) (now Ex)
The recruitment of Mrs T Chandrabanu as Scientist ‘F’ was totally manipulated by the team led by Dr W Selvamurthy, DS & CC R&D (LS & IC) (now Ex)
Misinterpretation of rules and manipulation to hide the facts by Shri Anil Kumar Maini, Director LESTECH, especially in the case of fire in Project “ Development of Advance Technologies for Power Scale up of COIL”
As per sources the report was submitted by stalwarts of DRDO and they gave clean chit in Ms S Geetha’s case to Dr W Selvamurthy, DS & CC R&D (LS & IC) (now Ex)
It is not understandable that these so called DRDO’s pillars have not seen the forged experience certificate and Dr A K Singh boasted that he very well knows that from whom and from where this forged certificate generated and Ms S Geetha was made eligible for the post. Dr A K Singh has worked as a staff officer with Dr W Selvamurthy, DS & CC R&D (LS & IC) (now Ex)
Sir, any lay man can understand that this 38 days certificate is totally forged and prepared especially for Ms S Geetha, nn Ambedkar college, DU there was/is no funds for research assistant and in the application Ms S Geetha claimed that she was paid @ 5000/month. This is kind of a silly point that was overlooked by these senior DRDO officials because of the heavy weight of Dr W Selvamurthy, DS & CC R&D (LS & IC) (now Ex)
In the recruitment case of Ms Swati Srivastava as Scientist ‘B’ the committee accepting some irregularities in recruitment process.
But why they are not accepting that the base of recruitment of Ms Swati Srivastava was totally wrong the post was advertised for Biotechnology, then how come Environment Science candidate applied and got selected among so many deserving biotechnology candidates. These involved DRDO officials have no hearts, they just cheated the whole nation and all deserving candidates.
In the recruitment case Mrs T Chandrabanu as Scientist ‘F’ the committee accepting some irregularities in recruitment process.
In the investigation of CVO,MOD they already found that she was not having required experience in the field.
Please find the proofs on above mentioned allegations then give marks to DRDO bluff masters, and this is really painful to see in this committee two members are from our great Indian Army.
Proofs/facts
High level committeeMs S Geetha’s ApplicationMs S Geetha’s Application
Above red mark – Experience mentioned -Dr B R Ambedkar Cetre for Biomedical Research, Delhi University, Period 15 Nov 1999 to 23 Jan 2000 as research assistant salary Rs 5000 (there is no funds for such research assistant job) Assisted M Sc Students
1. Experience certificate submitted by Ms Geetha (daughter of Dr. W Selvamurthy)
2. Copy of RTI reply by Delhi University Prof Vani Bharmchari’s statementMrs T Chandra Banu caseMrs T chandra Banu’s case notings
Appeal to clean DRDO of corrupt and anti-national officials
