Tag Archives: LDCE

Drdo

DMSRDE, Kanpur – LDCE Result

Leave a comment

In DRDO the HR policy is depending upon Lab Director’s wish, DRDO labs conducted Limited Department Competitive Examination (LDCE) every year. Each labs conducting this with directors wish like in IRDE they conducts as per their union leader’s desire anyone who belongs to certain union member can appear as well cleared without any hitch, no one in administration have dare to challenge his/ her certificate / diploma/ degree which he/ she possess is from valid recognized institute or it is from any tom dick harry institute.

The Lab DEAL which is nearly 2.5 kM away from IRDE conducting Limited Department Competitive Examination (LDCE) with different rules. DEAL is not allowing such certificate / diploma/ degree, which IRDE accepting for their employees. The DEAL earlier accepted such certificate / diploma/ degree for their beloved ones but now they totally banned. Now employees are fighting these issues in courts.

In DRDO almost nearly more than 2000 employees working on the basis of unrecognized/ illegally arranged certificate / diploma/ degree.

Same story is repeated by other labs, recently on 29th October 2014 DMSRDE also conducted Limited Department Competitive Examination (LDCE) and Director as per his reputation encouraged such unrecognized/ illegally arranged certificate / diploma/ degree and as per sources that one candidate who possess diploma from Rajasthan Vidyapeeth not only allowed for LDCE but selected also without verifying his diploma, Dr A K Singh, DOP already send a letter ( DOP/01/03500/Lumpsump/M/01 dated 11 March 2014) to all Labs and establishment that certificate / diploma/ degree should be verified properly.

The case of Amit Chawla, STA, LASTEC is still not cleared by administration.

Dr A K Saxena, please before declaring  the result verify the authenticity of   certificate / diploma/ degree as per Dr A K Singh, DOP’s letter otherwise DMSRDE employees can be challenge the result  of LDCE in court.

Question No 1 – Whether Individual  took permission for perusing diploma from Rajasthan Vidyapeet.

Question No. 2 Whether administration of DMSRDE checked the fee receipt of all six semesters.

Question No 4 Whether he was taken leave for examination for six semester exam dates.

Question No 5. whether examination center is recognized by AICTE/UGC etc

 

आज नहीं तो कल फसेगा तो इससे तो अछा है की जो नौकरी ईमानदारी से चल रही है उसी में खुस रहो क्यों इन भ्रष्ट लोगो के चक्कर में पद कर ज़िन्दगी क्यों ख़राब करते हो I बाकि तुम्हारी मर्जी – Das Bhai

Jai Hind

fake-degree-dop-letter

fake-degree-dop-letter-page2

Drdo

What happened if you are in hit list of Director?

Leave a comment

In DRDO there is no HR policy, although the post of CC R&D HR and a big HR directorate under him working in DRDO Hqrs but they are working with sole aim and object that how to execute and manage the unethical/ unconstitutional demands of DG, DRDO to all establishment heads.

Generally these demands are to adjust their beloved by any means like Smt. T Chandra Bhanu or Ms Geetha or Ms Swati Srivastva or Ms Dolly Bansal recruitment cases. Some cases come out from the four walls of DRDO but inside DRDO everyone knows this practice is continue carryon in DRDO by so called DRDO,HRD like adjustment of Commander Patel, Ex- SA’s daughter, CEPTAM Chairman’s son, Ex- Scientist ‘G’ in DEAL who was head of HRD, DEAL adjust his son Sh Saket Jain with all farzi certificates.

It is very well proven DRDO HRD can do any dam thing under wish of their AAKAS whether harassment of any individual from class IV employee to Scientist ‘H’. There is no moral exists in DRDO, HRD n numbers of examples available of transfers cases, manipulating in ACR/APAR’s, Awards to incompetents, authentication of false claims, list is too long.

The following case of Sh M R Gupta, TO ‘C’ is a clear cut case of dictatorship of DRDO officials, several years torture now Sh M R Gupta become chronic depression case.

Sh M R Gupta joined as JSA-II in 1979 in GTRE, DRDO, Bangalore, transferred to IRDE, Dehradun and subsequently joined DEAL as SSA in October 1987.

Up to 1986 his ACR’s was very good and enjoyed regular growth, but the day when then Director, IRDE Dr O P Nijhawan raised his eyebrow and put him in hit list, the bad days started and Sh M R Gupta’s service journey till date exposes the DRDO HR policy.

His 1987 ACR reflects the real bossism of Mr O P Nijhawan number dropped to 62

As IETE graduate Sh M R Gupta applied for the post of Assistant executive engineer in I & B through UPSC and got selected but Dr O P Nijhawan not supplied his 1987 ACR so he was deprived to get post.

Dr. O P Nijhawan’s effect also passed to DEAL and it was always made confirm that any advantage should not passed to Sh M R Gupta,

Sh M R Gupta qualified 9 times LDCE examination of Scientist ‘B’, the RTI revealed that RAC maintained the boss wishes. No one imagine the act of RAC officials.

Sh M R Gupta‘s ACR/ APAR of 1995 and 96 was found blank.

The 2004 ACR/APAR was reviewed by Sh Y P Sehgal, Ex Sc ‘G’ illegally as Sh M R Gupta was never worked with him and put adverse remark “ One disciplinary case is with DRDO Hqrs”  and remark was duly approved by the Director, Sh Ashok Sen and it was not even communicated to Sh M R Gupta.

DRDO having very common scenarios that if one official is in hit list then all chamchas never leave any chance to fix him to make happy the boss.

In case of Sh M R Gupta same thing happened, several attempts were done to harm, Dr. B S Jassal throw his wife’s medical bill for unforeseen reason and exchanged heat argument, in those argument frustrated Sh M R Gupta told him that I will jumped from the building, very next movement the explanation call with initiation of disciplinary action raised against him.

In 2004 Sh Mahakar Singh, Sc ‘G’ also demonstrated the extreme loyalty and one incident he scrimmage with Sh M R Gupta in his office room, next moment the room was sealed and an ION was served and an inquiry was constituted in a hurry and stage was set for dismiss Sh M R Gupta. By grace of God Sh M R Gupta approached local police and case was registered, subsequently after lower court to high court and again to lower court Sh Mahakar Singh rendered his apology in front of Session Judge, Dehradun and matter was closed.

This is not a single case, the HR policy ingest lot of DRDO officials by heart attack, High blood pressure, increasing number of bye passes, inserting stunts, depressions or exodus.

You can rate DRDO HR policy 5 stars, 4 stars, 3 stars, 2 stars or 1 star after going through the following papers.

MR. M R Gupta's 1987's ACR
MR. M R Gupta’s 1987’s ACR
MR M R Gupta ACR 1987
MR M R Gupta ACR 1987
Amazing score card of LDCE, RAC
Amazing score card of LDCE, RAC can anyone believe the DRDO HR policy

LDCE score details

Fast act of Sh Ashok Sen if he was right the why Sh Mahakar Singh rendered his apology in court for same incident
Fast act of Sh Ashok Sen
if he was right the why Sh Mahakar Singh rendered his apology in court for same incident
The Sh Ashok Sen's white washing team Sh.P C Sharma, CAO, Dr.B.S. Jassal, Sc 'F', Sh K.Sivakumar, Sc 'F', Sf Ajay Malik, Sc 'E'
The Sh Ashok Sen’s white washing team Sh.P C Sharma, CAO, Dr.B.S. Jassal, Sc ‘F’, Sh K.Sivakumar, Sc ‘F’, Sf Ajay Malik, Sc ‘E’
Sh Mahakar Singh rendered his apology in court
Sh Mahakar Singh rendered his apology in court
Sh Mahakar Singh rendered his apology in court
Sh Mahakar Singh rendered his apology in court

mrg letters

mrg letters1mrg letters2

Health condition of Mr M R Gupta or DRDO HR policy
Health condition of Mr M R Gupta or DRDO HR policy

mr gupta Max

 

Drdo

Alarming Situation in DRDO For HR Management

2 Comments
To                                                                                                         31st March 2014
Sh A K Antony,
Defence Minister,
Room -104, South Block
New Delhi – 110011

Subject:  Alarming Situation in DRDO For HR Management

DRDO has established more than 52 Labs/Establishments across the country with an aim and object to provide reliable & sustainable warfare technologies to the defence forces.

In its pursuit to evade the frontline technology, DRDO encourages its employees and officials to pursue higher qualification and provides all possible incentives as per GOI rules and guidelines.

DRDO Hqrs/ top brasses however, misuses the GOI facilities and encourages the diploma/ degrees from unrecognized universities/institutes for their pet employees (Chamchas), largely the cases are from the universities which are recognized by the UGC/AICTE but the courses offered by these in the mode of distance education, where the study centers / franchises are not properly authorized by UGC/AICTE or Apex body. Most of the cases in DRDO, these Diploma /Degrees are managed fraudulently because it is observed that employee who claimed the diploma / degree not having proper marks sheets, not having proof of proper fee receipts, not having leave records as per exam date sheets, not having admit cards of centers/ and n numbers of ways to verify the degree/ diploma etc.

Surprisingly, you will be shocked to know that these diploma / degree holders have become senior scientists and in DRDO, almost 10 to 15% in total staff / Technical officers / scientists possess such diploma/ degrees etc.

The growing incompetency and failure of projects causes shift towards system engineering. Since 15 years the basic science or fundamental research work has vanished from DRDO objectives, because of improperly qualified workforce.

The person inducted as laborer/peon/security assistant or technician, subsequently via limited departmental competitive examination (LDCE) channel and with the fake/unrecognized diploma / degree become scientist. It is all because of DRDO having their own recruitment and assessment system that is RAC & CEPTAM.

Sir, you already noticed few top scientists of DRDO misused the autonomy given to DRDOyou’re your good office recommended to reexamine the recruitment procedure of scientist in DRDO and asked for CBI intervention vide Ref- Note at 45-55 ante and observations of JS & CVO at note 56 ante.

RTI reveals that DRDO having such employees/ officers who don’t have proper recognized diploma / degree but no action was taken on this issue by DRDO Hqrs till date. (Copy enclosed for ready reference.)

In RTI reply No.01/2091/P2014/0054 dated 12 March 2014 DRDO Hqrs informed that “it is stated that the cases for grant of Lump Sum Incentive are received from respective Labs/Estt in which it is certified that the higher qualifications and the institute are approved by the competent authority. On receipt of such confirmation, the cases are submitted to Ministry of Defence who process each and every cases and issue sanction for grant of Lump Sum Incentives after getting concurrence of the Integrated Finance. However, in case of any doubt regarding verification/ reorganization, the same is thoroughly examined before issuing the sanction. It is also stated here that the lump sum incentive is only one time to promote higher qualification among employees.” (Copy Enclosed for ready reference)

Sir, the astonishing fact of DRDO working is revealed by Director of Personal vide letter No DOP/01/03500/Lump sum/M01 dated March 2014 to all Director Lab/Estt/ Dte in Hq dated 11 March 2014 in Para – 1, line- 9 states that “Of late it has been notice that in most of the cases are taken up acquiring higher qualification, recognition of various courses and universities/ institutes by Competent Authority is not verified/ authenticated by Labs prior to sanction of permission. This non verification in the some cases results in award of degrees/ diplomas by Universities / Institutes not recognized by the competent recognizing authorities. Grant of incentives for such higher qualification becomes against the Rules”   (Copy enclosed for your ready reference.)

It is requested that suitable committee should be form under supervision of CVO, MoD to scrutinize the DRDO scientist, officials and staff’s education qualification records thoroughly, so the incompetent and illegally inducted persons can weed out.

DRDO already spends crores of rupees for digitizing HR records so it is not big task to scrutinize the DRDO’s 7000+ scientists, 25000 + officials and staff’s education qualification.

Regards

Prabhu  Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun -248008
phone 0135 -2787750 Mobile 0911114879
e-mail id – prabhudoon@gmail.com website -www.corruptionindrdo.com
 
To
Dr. Syamal Kumar Sarkar
Secretary (Personnel)
Department of Personnel and Training
North Block, New Delhi -110001
 
To
Sh Avinash Chander,
DG DRDO, SA to RM,
DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg,
NEW DELHI -110105
 
To
Smt. Smita Nagaraj,
Joint Secretary (PlC) & CVO ,
Ministry of Defence, 109-B, South Block, 
New Delhi- 10011
 
 fake degree dop letter
fake degree dop letter page2
RTI reply drdo hq fake degree12 march
FA Reply1
FA Reply1

fareplypage2

List from DEAL, DRDO, Dehradun
List from DEAL, DRDO, Dehradun

 

Drdo

RTI – DMSRDE – Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena, Director, DMSRDE, Kanpur having own Rules for LDCE

7 Comments
 
To,                                                                   4th March 2014
Central Public Information Officer,
DMSRDE, DRDO, Min of Defence,
GT Road, Kanpur-208013

 

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information under purview of RTI Act 2005 in respect of Mr. Ajay Kishore Sharan, STA-B, DMSRDE, Kanpur.

Recruitment & Promotions in DRDO for DRTC are governed by DRDO Technical Cadre Recruitment Rules, 2000 notified vide number SRO 296 dated 05 December 2000 as amended framed by Ministry of Defence, Government of India. There is provision of recruitment of STA-B through LDCE under Rule 5(5) of DRDO Technical Cadre Recruitment Rules, 2000.

DMSRDE, Kanpur is an establishment under Materials Cluster of DRDO. LDCE 2012 for DRTC was conducted by DMSRDE for recruitment of STA -B and Mr. Ajay Kishore Sharan, STA -B (presently posted in Applied Chemistry Division, DMSRDE) was recruited on post of STA -B through LDCE 2012.

  1. Essential Qualification Requirement (EQR) pertaining to the post of STA -B for recruitment under LDCE 2012 at DMSRDE, Kanpur.
  2. Certified Copy of application submitted by Mr. Ajay Kishore Sharan for LDCE -2012
  3. Certified Copy of board proceeding of LDCE- 2012, DMSRDE, Kanpur including file noting for constitution of Selection Board for LDCE 2012 for DRTC by Director, DMSRDE.
  4. The composition of Selection Board for LDCE 2012 at DMSRDE for recruitment of STA ‘B’ under Rule 5(6) & Schedule IV of DRDO Technical Cadre Recruitment Rules, 2000 with name & rank of Chairperson & Members of Selection Board.
  5. Copy of recommendations of Selection Board after LDCE 2012 for recruitment of Mr. Ajay Kishore Sharan on the post of STA ‘B’ duly approved by Director, DMSRDE.
  6. Copy of appointment letter issued by Director, DMSRDE for recruitment of Mr. Ajay Kishore Sharan on post of STA ‘B’ after recruitment in LDCE 2012.
  7. Copy of the mark sheets & degree issued by the concerned Institution/University from which Mr. Ajay Kishore Sharan, STA ‘B’ achieved B.Sc. degree on the basis of which he was recruited on post of STA ‘B’ in LDCE 2012.
  8. Whether qualifying degree of Mr. Ajay Kishore Sharan, STA -Bfor appearing in LDCE 2012 was UGC recognized. (Yes/No)
  9. Whether any letter was sent to UGC regarding recognition of B.Sc. Psychology degree issued by Annamalai University under distance education. (Yes/No)
  10. If answer to point (9) is yes then provide copy of the letter sent to UGC, New Delhi from DMSRDE, Kanpur.
  11. Whether any confirmation achieved till date from UGC regarding recognition of  B.Sc. Psychology degree issued by Annamalai University under distance education. (Yes/No)
  12. Provide details of all candidates appeared in LDCE 2012 for the recruitment on post of STA -B in DMSRDE, Kanpur in following format.
  13. Any approval was taken from DRDO Hqrs for post of STA – B (B.Sc. Psychology) (Yes/No)

Note – It is alleged that Mr. Ajay Kishore Sharan, -B was recruited on post of STA ‘B’ through LDCE 2012 at DMSRDE, Kanpur on the basis of un recognized degree from UGC and his qualifying degree of B. Sc. Psychology is not covered under  Rule 5(5) and Schedule II of DRDO Technical Cadre Recruitment Rules, 2000.

The recruitment of Mr. Ajay Kishore Sharan is provisional on post of STA ‘B’.  Therefore the recruitment of Mr. Ajay Kishore Sharan, STA -B was made with gross violation of DRDO Technical Cadre Recruitment Rules, 2000 and Corruption by Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena, Director, DMSRDE, Kanpur.

The information sought pertains to misuse of power in official capacity of Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena, Director, DMSRDE and falls under the ambit of corruption, therefore not exempted u/s (24) of RTI Act 2005.

Regards

Prabhu  Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur,
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website www.corruptionindrdo.com

Registration Number            – MODEF/R/2014/60437

Drdo

SATYAMEV JAYATE

Leave a comment

BELIEVE ME FELLOW CITIZENS, DAYS OF CONTINUANCE OF THE SERVING CORRUPT OFFICERS OF DRDO IN GOVERNMENT SERVICE ARE VERY LIMITED AND THE COUNTDOWN HAS STARTED FOR THEIR REACHING TO THEIR RIGHTFUL PLACE OF BEHIND THE BAR PUBLIC NOTICE

All fellow honest citizens are called upon to provide information of corruption in DRDO so as to file a public interest litigation (PIL) to eradicate corruption from DRDO, Ministry of Defence.

This is a matter of great happiness to one and all that at least 10 (ten) prima-facie corrupt very senior retired scientists of DRDO are facing thorough investigation of the CBI on the approval of the Hon’ble honest Defence Minister Sh. A.K. Antony who is a beacon of hope to all honest fellow citizens. Now it has been decided by the likeminded retired and serving employees/officers of DRDO and by the interested honest fellow citizens to eradicate altogether every form of corruption from DRDO. So, I call upon all fellow honest citizens, retired and serving employees and officers of DRDO to kindly bring into the kind notice of me about the acts of corruption, criminal misconduct amounting to corruption, criminal conspiracy to commit criminal offences, breach of trust by the public servants of DRDO on the following aspects through whatever means suitable to them (i.e.through post, through email and through fax etc.).

1.      Corruption in Direct Recruitment for various posts in DRDO

(i)      Acts and omissions of Corruption in direct recruitment of non-gazetted staff in admin & allied    cadre and in  DRTC cadre of DRDO.

(ii)     Acts and omissions of Corruption in direct recruitment of Scientist ‘B’ under DRDS cadre of DRDO through   scientist entry test (SET) scheme.

(iii)      Acts and omissions of Corruption in direct recruitment of Scientist ‘B’ (for isolated posts) and  Scientist ‘C’, ‘D’, ‘E’, ‘F’,‘G’ & ‘H’ through lateral entry scheme.

(iv)     Acts and omissions of Corruption in direct recruitment of Scientist under DRDS cadre through ROSA Scheme.

(v)      Acts and omissions of Corruption in direct recruitment of Scientist under DRDS cadre through NRI Scheme.

(vi)     Acts and omissions of Corruption in direct recruitment of Scientist under DRDS cadre through campus recruitment scheme.

(vii)   Acts and omissions of Corruption in direct recruitment of Scientist under DRDS cadre by   making former teachers and guides of the candidates as members of the selection committees for direct recruitment of scientist.

(viii) Acts and omissions of Corruption in direct recruitment of Scientist under DRDS cadre by   misinterpreting true meaning of the concerned SROs and by violating the express provisions of the SROs.

(ix)    Acts and omissions of Corruption in direct recruitment to any post in DRDO (particularly to the post of Scientist) from the blood and marriage relatives of senior scientists of DRDO.

2.       Corruption in promotion for various posts in DRDO

(i)      Acts and omissions of Corruption in promotion given through Limited Departmental Competitive Exam (LDCE) method to DRTC personnel.

(ii)     Acts and omissions of Corruption in promotion given to the post of Scientist ‘B’ through LDCE  method to DRTC personnel.

(iii)    Acts and omissions of Corruption in promotion to the post of  Scientist C, D, E & F done through assessment boards of RAC by not creating the documents of the marks given by each member of the assessment board or by destroying such record or by not taking into cognizance the marks of individual members of the assessment boards.

(iv)    Acts and omissions of Corruption in promotion to the post of Scientist G & H (both outstanding scientists and distinguished scientists) through peer committee review method by rejecting the recommendation of the earlier committee or by nominating favorable members in the peer review committee or by taking into consideration the fake contribution mentioned by the candidates without ascertaining the correctness of the same.

(v)     Acts and omissions of Corruption in constitution of the assessment boards for promotion of scientist to the post of scientist C, D, E & F.

(vi)    Acts and omissions of Corruption in constitution of the members of peer committee for promotion to the post of Scientist G &H.

(vii)   Acts and omissions of Corruption in promotion done by CEPTAM through assessment to various non-gazetted and gazetted posts of DRTC cadre of DRDO.

(viii) Acts and omissions of Corruption in constitution of the assessment boards for promotion done by CEPTAM through assessment to various non-gazetted and gazetted posts of DRTC cadre of DRDO.

(ix)    Acts and omissions of Corruption in making promotion in Admin & allied cadre, DRTC cadre & DRDS cadre of DRDO by violating the express provisions of the concerned SROs.

3.       Corruption in permanent absorption of deputationist and service officers against various posts in DRDO

(i)      Acts and omissions of corruption in permanently absorbing the deputationist against the various posts of DRDO

(ii)     Acts and omissions of corruption in permanently absorbing the service officers in the DRDS cadre of DRDO.

(iii)    Acts and omissions of corruption in permanently absorbing service officers on the higher posts in DRDS cadre of DRDO in comparison to last post held by them in Defence forces.

4.       Corruption in making compassionate appointment in DRDO

(i)      Acts and omissions of corruption by giving false reports by the board of officers in favor of some candidates and in against to some candidates.

(ii)     Acts and omissions of corruption by taking into cognizance fake certificates of some candidates and ignoring genuine certificate of some candidates.

(iii)    Acts and omissions of corruption by appointing some candidates on impersonation basis.

(iv)    Acts and omissions of corruption in making appointment by twisting and distorting the extant government policy.

5.      Corruption in handling vigilance cases and matters

(i)      Acts and omissions of corruption by not implementing the standing policy of DOP&T (fully endorsed by DRDO HQ) regarding transfer of personnel and officers of DRDO holding sensitive appointments at regular interval.

(ii)     Acts and omissions of corruption on the part of director of vigilance & security of DRDO HQ by not taking into custody the original concerned record of DRDO and not submitting the same to the CVO of MOD within a maximum period of one month pertaining to complaints of vigilance nature submitted to CVC under Public interest disclosure and protection of the informer (PIDPI) resolution (colloquially-whistle blowers complaints) and forwarded to the Director of Vigilance & Security of DRDO HQ through CVO of MOD.

(iii)    Acts and omission of corruption in the form of submitting false report by the custodians of the concerned record of DRDO to the Director of Vigilance & Security pertaining to PIDPI complaints forwarded by CVC to the Director of Vigilance & Security of DRDO HQ through CVO of MOD.

(iv)    Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of not ascertaining the correctness of the report submitted by the custodians of the record of DRDO to the Director of Vigilance & Security of DRDO HQ by Director of Vigilance & Security of DRDO HQ and forwarding the same to the CVO of MOD leading to escape of the corrupt officers of the DRDO.

6.      Corruption in giving service extensions to the senior scientist of DRDO after attaining the age of superannuation

(i)      Acts and omissions of the corruption in the form of devising separate Performa in violation of the Performa prescribed by the DOP&T and submitting the proposal to the DOP&T in the tailor-made Performa for service extension of senior scientist in DRDO after attaining the age of superannuation.

(ii)     Acts and omissions of the corruption for initiating proposals for service extension of ineligible senior scientist as per the FR 56(D), processing and getting approval of such proposals from DOP&T and from appointment committee of cabinet.

(iii)    Acts and omissions of the corruption in the form of giving false comments and false appreciations and false contributions in favor of chosen retiring senior scientists in the concerned note sheets of the concerned files so as to extend illegal service extension to some chosen scientists by misrepresenting the material facts.

(iv)    Acts and omissions of the corruption by disregarding the complaints of vigilance angle pending against some of the retiring senior scientists and pushing forward proposal for service extension to them to do irreparable loss to public interest.

7.      Corruption in making buildings and infrastructure facilities and equipping such facilities with the necessary store      items in DRDO

(i)      Acts and omissions of corruption in awarding contract to particular contractors (having cartel or having an existing fake firms) for supply of stores and hiring of services for purely or mainly administrative nature of function of DRDO.

(ii)     Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of involvement of blood and marriage relatives of high officials of DRDO as owners, as board of directors or acting as partners in the firms or contractors to whom DRDO has been giving regular supply orders.

(iii)    Acts and omissions of corruption of any kind in tendering procedures for supply of stores and hiring of services and manpower in DRDO.

(iv)    Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of submitting inflated bills, of the store item purchased or the services hired, to the offices of DCDA (R&D).

(v)     Acts and omissions of corruption involving the colorable exercise of authority to abuse and misuse the authority vested in the capacity of senior government functionary for vested interests with regard to purchase of stores and hiring of services and manpower.

(vi)    Acts and omissions of corruption involving the cases of corruption in the form of misplaced sense of economy in purchasing stores and hiring services and manpower in DRDO.

(vii)   Acts and omissions of corruption involving any other kind of financial impropriety.

(viii) Acts and omissions of corruption by dismantling some portion of the newly constructed official buildings without actual need and to get the same renovated lavishly.

8.      Corruption in purchase of stores and in hiring of the services in DRDO exclusively or mainly on administrative nature of jobs

(i)      Acts and omissions of corruption in procurement of stores and hiring of services for purely or mainly administrative nature of function of DRDO.

(jj)     Acts and omissions of corruption in awarding contract to particular contractors (having cartel or having an existing fake firms) for supply of stores and hiring of services for purely or mainly administrative nature of function of DRDO.

(iii)    Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of involvement of blood and marriage relatives of high officials of DRDO as owners, as board of directors or acting as partners in the firms or contractors to whom DRDO has been giving regular supply orders.

(iv)    Acts and omissions of corruption of any kind in tendering procedures for supply of stores and hiring of services and manpower in DRDO.

(v)     Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of submitting inflated bills, of the store item purchased or the services hired, to the offices of DCDA (R&D).

(vi)    Acts and omissions of corruption involving the colorable exercise of authority to abuse and misuse the authority vested in the capacity of senior government functionary for vested interests with regard to
purchase of stores and hiring of services and manpower.

(vii)   Acts and omissions of corruption involving the cases of corruption in the form of misplaced sense of economy in purchasing stores and hiring services and manpower in DRDO.

(viii) Acts and omissions of corruption involving any other kind of financial impropriety.

9.      Corruption in awarding DRDO chair, chairman of the boards of DRDO and DRDO fellow

(i)      Acts and omissions of corruption for initiating processing and approving the proposal for awarding DRDO chair, chairmanship of the various boards of DRDO and DRDO fellowship to undeserving candidates by misrepresenting material facts.

(ii)     Acts and omissions of corruption done by the serving senior scientists of DRDO HQ in the form of quid-pro-quo to those retired scientists in the form of awarding DRDO chair, chairmanship of the various boards and DRDO fellowship who gave clean chit in the corruption cases against the serving senior scientists.

(iii)    Acts and omissions of corruption for initiating proposals to remove the age limit of 70 years for DRDO chair to give undue advantage to chosen retired scientists like SK Salwan.

(iv)    Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of giving DRDO chair to those retired chairman of RAC who was involved in rule making activity illegally for assessment of scientist F for promotion to the post of scientist G in 2011.

10.     Corruption in the form of misleading the parliament of India

(i)      Acts and omissions of the corruption in the form of false report submitted to either house of parliament about the successfulness of the particular project which was actually not successful.

(ii)     Acts and omissions of the corruption in the form of giving false report to either house of the parliament with regard to involvement and entrusting of Admin & allied cadre responsibilities to the scientist and technical manpower of DRDO.

11.     Miscellaneous nature of corruption in DRDO

(i)      Acts and omissions of corruption in the nature of disobeying the direction of law by the senior officer of DRDO while acting in official capacity.

(ii)     Acts and omissions of corruption in the nature of breaching the trust of public in the capacity of public servants by senior scientist of DRDO violating their official capacity.

(iii)    Acts and omissions of corruption and criminal conspiracy to breach the trust of public in the capacity of public servant and to commit other criminal offences with common intention to do so.

(iv)    Acts and omissions of corruption in the nature of joining those private educational or commercial concerns by the retired senior scientist of DRDO within 01 year from retirement to whom DRDO have given funds and acted in collaboration with them.

(v)     Acts and omissions of corruption in the nature of embezzlement of govt. money in DRDO in whatever manner possible.

(vi)    Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of misappropriation of govt. money by twisting the material facts and acting in collusion.

(vii)   Acts and omissions of corruption in the nature of false claim of TA/DA and LTC by using flyer points and charging from the govt. exchequer in the name of LTC.

(viii) Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of drawing HRA illegally while residing in govt. guest houses by the very senior functionaries of DRDO.

(ix)    Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of using govt. vehicle for personal uses & showing them as official usage.

(x)     Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of weekly visiting native places situated at Hyderabad and Bangalore in the pretext of official duty and charging huge amount as air fare by the very senior scientist of DRDO HQ.

(ix)    Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of showing false expenses in other heads of accounts for actual expenses of lakhs of rupees incurred for liquor parties and lavish dance parties arranged every year and directors’ conference in Metcalfe House, Delhi and at Development Enclave, Delhi.

(x)     Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of acquiring and amassing disproportionate movable and immovable assets by the very senior scientists contrary to their known sources of income.

(xi)    Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of posting and retaining unauthorized Gazetted and non-Gazetted manpower of AFHQ cadre in DRDO HQ.

(xii)   Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of illegally posting AFHQ cadre officers in the labs of DRDO at Delhi.

(xiii) Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of creation of illegal and unauthorized designations in DRDO HQ and in the labs of DRDO without the authority/approval of Finance Ministry.

(xiv) Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of willful distraction and non-maintenance of the concerned record as per the provisions of public record act 1993 so as to avoid fixation of responsibility against the illegal acts of the very senior scientists of DRDO.

(xv)   Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of allotting govt. accommodation to non-eligible persons in DRDO’s own accommodation by the Estate Managers of the EMU of DRDO.

Don’t be afraid of anything, be bold and be knowledgeable in the sense that whoever has committed criminal offences of criminal conspiracy for committing breach of trust and using and issuing fake certificate or tampering in govt. records or indulging in criminal misconduct amounting to corruption for committing any kind of criminal offences can be caught and brought to the book at any time as per the provisions of IPC 1860, Cr. PC 1973 and prevention of corruption act 1988. There is no bar of limitation act in initiating criminal case by any person for committing criminal offences by the high serving and retired functionaries of DRDO. The only thing is important is that whatever information you provide to me should be verifiable from some independent govt. document whether in your custody or not and wherever available. Don’t think that particular case of corruption in DRDO in your knowledge is some 15 years or 20 years old. Documentary evidences created during ordinary transaction of official work in DRDO are like the guided missiles in which very senior scientist of DRDO are very expert. Don’t forget that the responsibility to eradicate corruption from DRDO lies on shoulders of every stakeholder. Please do contribute in this effort of nation building for which next progeny of ours will always remember us. Fellow honest citizens of this great country are the biggest stakeholder to eradicate corruption from DRDO.

JAIHIND

Uncategorized

How Fast DOP Works in DRDO for his Beloveds

Leave a comment

8th August 2011

Dear Dr Saraswat Ji Good Morning                      

How your DOP works please go through the following case of Sh Dharmendra Kumar Scientist ‘B’ SPIC, DRDO. The case Sh Dharmendra Kumar Scientist ‘B’ SPIC shows how DRDO top brass handles the case of their beloveds. The whole process done by DOP in such a manner that even lay man can smell of DOP’s rotten empire.

  1. DRDO issued 2 appointment letter to Sh Dharmendra Kumar
  2. DOP bypassed the CC and direct got your approval.
  3. Sh Dharmendra Kumar sent a letter from Pune on 3rd Feb 2011 to you from NDA, Khadakwasla letter no NDA/DK/Pers/DRDO/10-11 dated 03 Feb 2010 and on 14th Feb 2011 the whole case is processed by your most efficient DOP and his staff and a letter was dispatched by  Sh B B Sharma, Joint Director(Pers-TC) letter no DOP/01/00025/Misc/NG/01.

Sir can you tell the poor DRDO staffs that what channel is best to send grievances which are the more serious matters than Sh Dharmendra Kumar’s case or tell us Sh Dharmendra Kumar’s hot line with you.

I request all the applicant or petitioner who wants to settle their grievances from SA to route their application through Sh Dharmendra Kumar, Scientist ‘B’, SPIC, DRDO, New Delhi. His Mobile No/ land line No and home address you will get soon on website in interest of DRDO officials.

  1. Sh Dharmendra Kumar sent a letter from Pune on 17th March 2011 to DOP for request to extend his joining time and on 18th March 2011 DOP granted extension. DRDO only work in this speed at time of last week of every March for procurement cases.
  2. Sh Dharmendra Kumar was not in the strength of DRDO when 1st appointment letter was issued in his name i.e. 23rd Dec 2010 as he was already joined NDA on 22nd Dec 2011, then how come LDCE appointment offered him.
  3.  PMO is looking forward for name of Sh Dharmendra Kumar’s  in next DRDO award list as young scientist award, because Dr Vasudeva will definitely going to include his name for his great contributions to manipulating the fake procurement case with Sh Suchit  and Sh.Jitender Chug as you already aware that Director Vigilance, Ministry of Defence asked all expenditure done by SPIC up to 31st July 2011.

Hope you will take this case seriously in the interest of the organization and for building faith of DRDO officials.

Thanking you

Regards

Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun 248008  
Phone – 0135-2787750, Mobile,  9411114879
E-mail id  prabhu@dandriyal.com   , prabhudoon@gmail.com Website www.corruptionindrdo.com/