Tag Archives: DRTC

Drdo

RTI- Diploma/Degree holder obtained through distance education -entertaining in DRTC assessment

1 Comment
To,                                                                                               28th July 2014
Dr. RB Sharma, CPIO
DRDO HQ, Min. of Defence
DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg
New Delhi-110011                             

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of verifications of Diploma/Degree holder obtained through distance education of DRDO officials. It is observed that there are no laid down procedures following by DRDO labs/Estt for considering such Diploma/Degree obtained through distance education like in DEAL, Dehradun not considering such Diploma/Degree holder employees for LDCE nor endorsing in their service book. Other way round in DRTC assessment these Diploma/ Degree are considering by the assessment board. As per DOP letter No DOP/01/ 03500/ Lumpsum/M/01 dated 11th March 2014, DOP admitted that there no verifications were done for these Diploma/ Degree holder officials of DRDO. In RTI reply letter No RTI/02/2091/F/2013/0016 dated 20 August 2013 DRDO Hqrs accepted that seven officials of DEAL, Dehradun does not possess the recognize diploma and even not from recognized center. In view of this following information is requested.

  1. Copy of approval of competent authority for entertaining such Diploma/Degree holder employees for DRTC assessment 2014.
  2. Copies of DoPT approval for continue such Diploma/Degree holder employees in service.
  3. Provide the number of court cases admitted in various courts filed by Diploma/Degree (obtained through distance education ) holder employees of DRDO in last five years from March 2009-April 2014

Note: the requested information is not come under exemption of schedule -II of RTI Act 2005. Since, March 2014 end DRDO stopped to provide information under shadow of exemption. It is requested in above para-one of this request it is clear cut mentioned the corruption/ favoritism/ abuse of power, so before denial of information your point wise explanation is required that the matter not pertain under corruption.

Regards

Prabhu  Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur,
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website www.corruptionindrdo.com

Enclosed: RTI Replies of DRDO, DOP letter No DOP/01/ 03500/ Lumpsum/M/01 dated 11th March 2014

Registration Number        MODEF/R/2014/61350Drdo RTI reply on fake degree 1Drdo RTI reply on fake degree 2Drdo RTI reply on fake degree 3RTI reply drdo hq fake degree12 marchfake degree dop letterfake degree dop letter page2

Drdo

RTI is only weapon to correct the mind of so called Dictators of DRDO

2 Comments

Dear friends of DRDO,

Following inputs being published for awareness of all DRDO officials. All of them are experiencing the arbitrariness of entire DRDO‘s Lab directors. Every year you all are silent spectators of this arbitrary conduct of the respective lab directors when DRDS or DRTC promotion’s results are declared.

Few days’ frustration looks are seen on the faces of few but again they indulge in the same cycle. If you seriously observe the health condition of DRDO scientists, this time every year a bitter sip of humiliation distorted the life and health conditions of each one.

It is not because of their failure in assessment. It is because of the success of those incompetent / working on non-scientific assignments.

Earlier in days of beginning of 90’s this kind of push pull was not done openly or in a big way. One or two cases were seen in entire DRDO, but nowadays Directors, New born DG’s, DRDO Hqrs beloved boys are fully creating dadagiri and clearing/helping incompetent and ignoring all those who are seriously involved in scientific research and development.

Although the exodus ratio dropout because of two reasons. One, the world economic recession and two, the VIth pay commission hike in pay package of scientists, but this frustration directly affected their output and as well as their daily life. The enthusiasm of young scientists is lost in DRDO and now they are involved to mint money in all means. An example would be like the LTC 80 scam of Metcalf house is a clear signal of the mindset of the new generation of DRDO team.

The following papers are the example of dadagiri of DRDO lab directors. Sh. M R Gupta, TO ‘C’ was joined DRDO in 9 Nov 1979 as JSA – II, subsequently transferred IRDE in 1981 and in 1987 in DEAL, he is IETE graduate (1987), presently he is working as TO ‘C’ in DEAL since 2008. As per normal conditions he is supposed to get a promotion in 2001.

Sh. M R Gupta rested his ACR/APAR through RTI in 2013 from 1987 to 2013 after a long battle CIC ordered to supply all ACR to DRDO on 4th March 2014 vide File No.CIC/LS/A/2013/001815/RM dated 2014 “DECISION – The Commission directed the CPIO to provide copies of ACRs for the period 1987-2007 as sought by the appellant within three weeks from the date of receipt of this order, free of cost”

Now see in followin enclosed document, Sh M R Gupta shocked to see that his two year ACR/ APAR of 1995 and 96 was blank and in 2004 ACR/APAR was reviewed by Sh Y P Sehgal, Ex Sc ‘G’ illegally as Sh M R Gupta was never worked with him and put adverse remark “ One disciplinary case is with DRDO Hqrs”  and remark was duly approved by the Director, Sh Ashok Sen and best part of this RTI revealed that it was not even communicated to Sh M R Gupta.

This illegal unethical act done by Sh. Ashok Sen, then Director, DEAL was perfect example of DRDO work atmosphere, which proves that the absolute power made DRDO Lab’s director became autocratic/dictator/tyrant, etc.

This is not the only case you will find this kind of act in the entire DRDO. RTI’s also revealed that in several cases white fluid applied in ACR/APAR, tempering of marks in any stage even after in final stage at DRDO Hqrs.

It is requested to all suffering DRDO officials to please file RTIs with reference to supreme court order of Justice Markandey Katju, in Devi dutt Vs Union of India  (CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7631 OF 2002) to confirm your ACR/APAR marks and comments.

One more important observation is that these DRDO Lab’s director also authenticating false claim of work to their beloved incompetent scientists.

Hope with the following example you all will review your promotion profile and analyze the possible flaw in the process of DRDO’s promotion mechanism.

Regards

mr gupta ACR1-2004mr gupta ACR2-2004

mr gupta ACR3-2004

To,                                                                                                           5th May 2014
Dr. Sangeeta Khare, CPIO
DEAL, DRDO
Raipur Road, DEHRADUN-248001             

Madam,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect to my ACR/APAR of year 2004. Recently on 11th April 2014 CPIO, CEPTAM send me ACR/APAR from 1987 -2007. In 2014 ACR/APAR assessing officer was Sh K Siva Kumar, Sc ‘F’ and reviewing officer Sh Y P Sehgal, Sc ‘G’(copy enclosed). Sh Y P Sehgal, Sc ‘G’ reviewing officer put adverse remark in para 5 –“one disciplinary case is with DRDO Hqrs”.

  1. Provide the certified copy of disciplinary case which was pending in DRDO Hqrs against me as mentioned by RO, Sh Y P Sehgal, Sc ‘G’.
  2. Present status of disciplinary case which was mentioned by RO Sh Y P Sehgal, Sc ‘G’.
  3. Provide the certified copy of communication letter of above adverse remark.
  4. Provide the DO part order/ION on the basis RO mentioned in APAR/ACR para 2 that I have served under him form 1st June 2004 to 31st December 2004.

Note. The information sought for concerns related to my life and health condition. I am in mental agony, my health is deteriorating day by day, and necessary medical certificates from Fortis & Max Hospital are enclosed for your ready reference. It is requested the information should be provided within forty-eight hours of the receipt of the request, so that my health will improve sharply.

Enclosed:-

  1. Photocopy of APAR/ACR of 2004
  2. Medical Certificate of Fortis Hospital, Chandigarh
  3. Medical Certificate of Max Hospital, Dehradun

Thanking You

(M. R. Gupta)
             T O ‘C’
21- Bank Colony, Adhoiwala
Raipur Road, DEHRADUN – 2248001
 
Rs 10 fee is deposited cashmr gupta rti DEAL reply
Drdo

Distributing Promotion on Platter to Dr A K Singh, Sc G, DOP,DRDO & Sh R K Jain, Sc ‘H’Director, RAC, DRDO

4 Comments

Hello Friends                                                                                           11 June 2014

Today I have received this letter with request to publish it on the website. This is the harsh reality of DRDO, everyone in every Lab & Establishment of DRDO is witnessing the same scenario in DRDS  from Sc ‘B’ to Sc ‘H’, in DRTC Technicians to TO ‘D’, Admin allied, Stores are standing nowhere in DRDO’s priority.PKS

Drdo

DRDO trying to manage counter the Ex-Defence Minister Sh. A K Antony’s recommendation to scrap RAC with help of ASCI

Leave a comment

Ex-Defence Minister Sh. A K Antony recommended reconsideration of DRDO recruitment of scientists again from UPSC channel instead of DRDO’s own Recruitment Assessment Centre (RAC). From 1984 on wards RAC independently recruited scientists as or when required by DRDO. The RAC is managed by DRDO scientists who were under control of DRDO top brasses directly.

CVO, MOD analyzed after receiving several complaints against DRDO top brasses that there were a lot of manipulations done in laid down recruitment rules by RAC & senior DRDO officials to recruit their  wards. CVO, MOD proposed CBI enquiries against 10 top DRDO scientists who were involved in such criminal conspiracy. CVO, MOD also suggested that RAC be scrapped and scientists’ recruitment should be done through UPSC again. For this it was suggested that a study is conducted that would evaluate the RAC functionality by XLRI, ASCI Hyderabad, etc.

As DRDO has several experts bluff masters who have already proven their expertise by fooling the nation in different important projects, few are delayed by several years and few are closed unceremoniously.

So again they came forward to counter CVO, MOD suggestion and gave HR audit to Administrative Staff College of India (ASCI), Hyderabad. ASCI introduced just one program in DRDO in 2006-07. Today, in 2014, ASCI is running several programs in the name of risk management, basic project management and a lot of other gimmicks in ITM-Mussoorie, DIPAS-Delhi, DRDL, ANURAG and so on. It is essentially a give and take game with no scope for improvement or benefits of DRDO or the officials. This can be seen from HR Audit of DRDO: A Pilot Study, a feedback format by ASCI, Hyderabad enclosed for your ready reference.

Interestingly the format is very good but the process of feedback is very bad.

The ASCI approaches each lab/establishment of DRDO with the feedback format.  I don’t know whether ASCI knows about the absolute power of DRDO directors or not. Example of LASTEC, when ASCI approached Director, LASTEC, Dr. A K Maini and asked for 20 volunteer names of DRDS, DRTC and Admin allied, he gave names of 20 chamchas (yes-men) in all categories. Can you imagine that ASCI will get the real picture of DRDO work scenario by using such methodology of assessment? It is impossible.  These things repeat everywhere and this futile exercise is for countering CVO, MOD suggestion only.

The major check points for ASCI

Section 2 Point No. 1. (c) Working for nation attitude – Totally missing very few young scientists having such thinking.

(f) Professional freedom – Nil and this is the main reason of the exodus of nearly 700 in the last three years. You can verify this from continuous questions in the parliament on this issue.

(i) Rewards and recognition – Only reserved for chamachas. Please see the last ten years award list (in case of LASTEC local annual awards when Chairman award committee was Dr. R K Tyagi he gave award to himself and when Chairman award committee was Mrs. Neelam Malhan she gave the award to herself. It is not a joke; it is the great award culture of DRDO, which is followed in all awards of DRDO.

(t)Opportunity of Promotion – Only reserved for chamachas. Almost 90% results of every assessment were known by labs officials before assessment. In DRDO, officials are divided in three parts, one whom the director makes sure their promotions, second part those if get clear promotion line or not cleared director doesn’t bother and third part are those for them director makes sure that in any case they have to be deprived for promotion. This is a well known truth of today’s DRDO.

(u)Training – Only reserved for chamachas. Only name of selected officials cleared by Director’s office. It is immaterial whether person selected for training is related with his assigned work or field.

Remaining points are useless.

Point No 3.

(h) Workload – there are more than 50 % workforce (nearly 30000 personal) that has no work load due to outsourcing for minting money. It can be proved by analyzing their specific individual output.

(i)      Grievances redressal mechanism – Very poor it can judged by the increasing number of court cases and representations received by Scientific Adviser , ASCI will not get clear picture from an individual feedback of chamchas.

ASCI will take money and forget but the nation who is going to pay for this HR Audit; it will get a big zero.

It is requested to DRDO’s honest officials to fill the following formats and send to ASCI mail address, nirmalya@asci.org.in to show the clear picture of DRDO to ASCI.asci format asci format1 asci format2

 

asci format3

 

asci format4

Drdo

RTI – DMSRDE – Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena, Director, DMSRDE, Kanpur having own Rules for LDCE

7 Comments
 
To,                                                                   4th March 2014
Central Public Information Officer,
DMSRDE, DRDO, Min of Defence,
GT Road, Kanpur-208013

 

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information under purview of RTI Act 2005 in respect of Mr. Ajay Kishore Sharan, STA-B, DMSRDE, Kanpur.

Recruitment & Promotions in DRDO for DRTC are governed by DRDO Technical Cadre Recruitment Rules, 2000 notified vide number SRO 296 dated 05 December 2000 as amended framed by Ministry of Defence, Government of India. There is provision of recruitment of STA-B through LDCE under Rule 5(5) of DRDO Technical Cadre Recruitment Rules, 2000.

DMSRDE, Kanpur is an establishment under Materials Cluster of DRDO. LDCE 2012 for DRTC was conducted by DMSRDE for recruitment of STA -B and Mr. Ajay Kishore Sharan, STA -B (presently posted in Applied Chemistry Division, DMSRDE) was recruited on post of STA -B through LDCE 2012.

  1. Essential Qualification Requirement (EQR) pertaining to the post of STA -B for recruitment under LDCE 2012 at DMSRDE, Kanpur.
  2. Certified Copy of application submitted by Mr. Ajay Kishore Sharan for LDCE -2012
  3. Certified Copy of board proceeding of LDCE- 2012, DMSRDE, Kanpur including file noting for constitution of Selection Board for LDCE 2012 for DRTC by Director, DMSRDE.
  4. The composition of Selection Board for LDCE 2012 at DMSRDE for recruitment of STA ‘B’ under Rule 5(6) & Schedule IV of DRDO Technical Cadre Recruitment Rules, 2000 with name & rank of Chairperson & Members of Selection Board.
  5. Copy of recommendations of Selection Board after LDCE 2012 for recruitment of Mr. Ajay Kishore Sharan on the post of STA ‘B’ duly approved by Director, DMSRDE.
  6. Copy of appointment letter issued by Director, DMSRDE for recruitment of Mr. Ajay Kishore Sharan on post of STA ‘B’ after recruitment in LDCE 2012.
  7. Copy of the mark sheets & degree issued by the concerned Institution/University from which Mr. Ajay Kishore Sharan, STA ‘B’ achieved B.Sc. degree on the basis of which he was recruited on post of STA ‘B’ in LDCE 2012.
  8. Whether qualifying degree of Mr. Ajay Kishore Sharan, STA -Bfor appearing in LDCE 2012 was UGC recognized. (Yes/No)
  9. Whether any letter was sent to UGC regarding recognition of B.Sc. Psychology degree issued by Annamalai University under distance education. (Yes/No)
  10. If answer to point (9) is yes then provide copy of the letter sent to UGC, New Delhi from DMSRDE, Kanpur.
  11. Whether any confirmation achieved till date from UGC regarding recognition of  B.Sc. Psychology degree issued by Annamalai University under distance education. (Yes/No)
  12. Provide details of all candidates appeared in LDCE 2012 for the recruitment on post of STA -B in DMSRDE, Kanpur in following format.
  13. Any approval was taken from DRDO Hqrs for post of STA – B (B.Sc. Psychology) (Yes/No)

Note – It is alleged that Mr. Ajay Kishore Sharan, -B was recruited on post of STA ‘B’ through LDCE 2012 at DMSRDE, Kanpur on the basis of un recognized degree from UGC and his qualifying degree of B. Sc. Psychology is not covered under  Rule 5(5) and Schedule II of DRDO Technical Cadre Recruitment Rules, 2000.

The recruitment of Mr. Ajay Kishore Sharan is provisional on post of STA ‘B’.  Therefore the recruitment of Mr. Ajay Kishore Sharan, STA -B was made with gross violation of DRDO Technical Cadre Recruitment Rules, 2000 and Corruption by Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena, Director, DMSRDE, Kanpur.

The information sought pertains to misuse of power in official capacity of Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena, Director, DMSRDE and falls under the ambit of corruption, therefore not exempted u/s (24) of RTI Act 2005.

Regards

Prabhu  Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur,
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website www.corruptionindrdo.com

Registration Number            – MODEF/R/2014/60437

Drdo

SATYAMEV JAYATE

Leave a comment

BELIEVE ME FELLOW CITIZENS, DAYS OF CONTINUANCE OF THE SERVING CORRUPT OFFICERS OF DRDO IN GOVERNMENT SERVICE ARE VERY LIMITED AND THE COUNTDOWN HAS STARTED FOR THEIR REACHING TO THEIR RIGHTFUL PLACE OF BEHIND THE BAR PUBLIC NOTICE

All fellow honest citizens are called upon to provide information of corruption in DRDO so as to file a public interest litigation (PIL) to eradicate corruption from DRDO, Ministry of Defence.

This is a matter of great happiness to one and all that at least 10 (ten) prima-facie corrupt very senior retired scientists of DRDO are facing thorough investigation of the CBI on the approval of the Hon’ble honest Defence Minister Sh. A.K. Antony who is a beacon of hope to all honest fellow citizens. Now it has been decided by the likeminded retired and serving employees/officers of DRDO and by the interested honest fellow citizens to eradicate altogether every form of corruption from DRDO. So, I call upon all fellow honest citizens, retired and serving employees and officers of DRDO to kindly bring into the kind notice of me about the acts of corruption, criminal misconduct amounting to corruption, criminal conspiracy to commit criminal offences, breach of trust by the public servants of DRDO on the following aspects through whatever means suitable to them (i.e.through post, through email and through fax etc.).

1.      Corruption in Direct Recruitment for various posts in DRDO

(i)      Acts and omissions of Corruption in direct recruitment of non-gazetted staff in admin & allied    cadre and in  DRTC cadre of DRDO.

(ii)     Acts and omissions of Corruption in direct recruitment of Scientist ‘B’ under DRDS cadre of DRDO through   scientist entry test (SET) scheme.

(iii)      Acts and omissions of Corruption in direct recruitment of Scientist ‘B’ (for isolated posts) and  Scientist ‘C’, ‘D’, ‘E’, ‘F’,‘G’ & ‘H’ through lateral entry scheme.

(iv)     Acts and omissions of Corruption in direct recruitment of Scientist under DRDS cadre through ROSA Scheme.

(v)      Acts and omissions of Corruption in direct recruitment of Scientist under DRDS cadre through NRI Scheme.

(vi)     Acts and omissions of Corruption in direct recruitment of Scientist under DRDS cadre through campus recruitment scheme.

(vii)   Acts and omissions of Corruption in direct recruitment of Scientist under DRDS cadre by   making former teachers and guides of the candidates as members of the selection committees for direct recruitment of scientist.

(viii) Acts and omissions of Corruption in direct recruitment of Scientist under DRDS cadre by   misinterpreting true meaning of the concerned SROs and by violating the express provisions of the SROs.

(ix)    Acts and omissions of Corruption in direct recruitment to any post in DRDO (particularly to the post of Scientist) from the blood and marriage relatives of senior scientists of DRDO.

2.       Corruption in promotion for various posts in DRDO

(i)      Acts and omissions of Corruption in promotion given through Limited Departmental Competitive Exam (LDCE) method to DRTC personnel.

(ii)     Acts and omissions of Corruption in promotion given to the post of Scientist ‘B’ through LDCE  method to DRTC personnel.

(iii)    Acts and omissions of Corruption in promotion to the post of  Scientist C, D, E & F done through assessment boards of RAC by not creating the documents of the marks given by each member of the assessment board or by destroying such record or by not taking into cognizance the marks of individual members of the assessment boards.

(iv)    Acts and omissions of Corruption in promotion to the post of Scientist G & H (both outstanding scientists and distinguished scientists) through peer committee review method by rejecting the recommendation of the earlier committee or by nominating favorable members in the peer review committee or by taking into consideration the fake contribution mentioned by the candidates without ascertaining the correctness of the same.

(v)     Acts and omissions of Corruption in constitution of the assessment boards for promotion of scientist to the post of scientist C, D, E & F.

(vi)    Acts and omissions of Corruption in constitution of the members of peer committee for promotion to the post of Scientist G &H.

(vii)   Acts and omissions of Corruption in promotion done by CEPTAM through assessment to various non-gazetted and gazetted posts of DRTC cadre of DRDO.

(viii) Acts and omissions of Corruption in constitution of the assessment boards for promotion done by CEPTAM through assessment to various non-gazetted and gazetted posts of DRTC cadre of DRDO.

(ix)    Acts and omissions of Corruption in making promotion in Admin & allied cadre, DRTC cadre & DRDS cadre of DRDO by violating the express provisions of the concerned SROs.

3.       Corruption in permanent absorption of deputationist and service officers against various posts in DRDO

(i)      Acts and omissions of corruption in permanently absorbing the deputationist against the various posts of DRDO

(ii)     Acts and omissions of corruption in permanently absorbing the service officers in the DRDS cadre of DRDO.

(iii)    Acts and omissions of corruption in permanently absorbing service officers on the higher posts in DRDS cadre of DRDO in comparison to last post held by them in Defence forces.

4.       Corruption in making compassionate appointment in DRDO

(i)      Acts and omissions of corruption by giving false reports by the board of officers in favor of some candidates and in against to some candidates.

(ii)     Acts and omissions of corruption by taking into cognizance fake certificates of some candidates and ignoring genuine certificate of some candidates.

(iii)    Acts and omissions of corruption by appointing some candidates on impersonation basis.

(iv)    Acts and omissions of corruption in making appointment by twisting and distorting the extant government policy.

5.      Corruption in handling vigilance cases and matters

(i)      Acts and omissions of corruption by not implementing the standing policy of DOP&T (fully endorsed by DRDO HQ) regarding transfer of personnel and officers of DRDO holding sensitive appointments at regular interval.

(ii)     Acts and omissions of corruption on the part of director of vigilance & security of DRDO HQ by not taking into custody the original concerned record of DRDO and not submitting the same to the CVO of MOD within a maximum period of one month pertaining to complaints of vigilance nature submitted to CVC under Public interest disclosure and protection of the informer (PIDPI) resolution (colloquially-whistle blowers complaints) and forwarded to the Director of Vigilance & Security of DRDO HQ through CVO of MOD.

(iii)    Acts and omission of corruption in the form of submitting false report by the custodians of the concerned record of DRDO to the Director of Vigilance & Security pertaining to PIDPI complaints forwarded by CVC to the Director of Vigilance & Security of DRDO HQ through CVO of MOD.

(iv)    Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of not ascertaining the correctness of the report submitted by the custodians of the record of DRDO to the Director of Vigilance & Security of DRDO HQ by Director of Vigilance & Security of DRDO HQ and forwarding the same to the CVO of MOD leading to escape of the corrupt officers of the DRDO.

6.      Corruption in giving service extensions to the senior scientist of DRDO after attaining the age of superannuation

(i)      Acts and omissions of the corruption in the form of devising separate Performa in violation of the Performa prescribed by the DOP&T and submitting the proposal to the DOP&T in the tailor-made Performa for service extension of senior scientist in DRDO after attaining the age of superannuation.

(ii)     Acts and omissions of the corruption for initiating proposals for service extension of ineligible senior scientist as per the FR 56(D), processing and getting approval of such proposals from DOP&T and from appointment committee of cabinet.

(iii)    Acts and omissions of the corruption in the form of giving false comments and false appreciations and false contributions in favor of chosen retiring senior scientists in the concerned note sheets of the concerned files so as to extend illegal service extension to some chosen scientists by misrepresenting the material facts.

(iv)    Acts and omissions of the corruption by disregarding the complaints of vigilance angle pending against some of the retiring senior scientists and pushing forward proposal for service extension to them to do irreparable loss to public interest.

7.      Corruption in making buildings and infrastructure facilities and equipping such facilities with the necessary store      items in DRDO

(i)      Acts and omissions of corruption in awarding contract to particular contractors (having cartel or having an existing fake firms) for supply of stores and hiring of services for purely or mainly administrative nature of function of DRDO.

(ii)     Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of involvement of blood and marriage relatives of high officials of DRDO as owners, as board of directors or acting as partners in the firms or contractors to whom DRDO has been giving regular supply orders.

(iii)    Acts and omissions of corruption of any kind in tendering procedures for supply of stores and hiring of services and manpower in DRDO.

(iv)    Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of submitting inflated bills, of the store item purchased or the services hired, to the offices of DCDA (R&D).

(v)     Acts and omissions of corruption involving the colorable exercise of authority to abuse and misuse the authority vested in the capacity of senior government functionary for vested interests with regard to purchase of stores and hiring of services and manpower.

(vi)    Acts and omissions of corruption involving the cases of corruption in the form of misplaced sense of economy in purchasing stores and hiring services and manpower in DRDO.

(vii)   Acts and omissions of corruption involving any other kind of financial impropriety.

(viii) Acts and omissions of corruption by dismantling some portion of the newly constructed official buildings without actual need and to get the same renovated lavishly.

8.      Corruption in purchase of stores and in hiring of the services in DRDO exclusively or mainly on administrative nature of jobs

(i)      Acts and omissions of corruption in procurement of stores and hiring of services for purely or mainly administrative nature of function of DRDO.

(jj)     Acts and omissions of corruption in awarding contract to particular contractors (having cartel or having an existing fake firms) for supply of stores and hiring of services for purely or mainly administrative nature of function of DRDO.

(iii)    Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of involvement of blood and marriage relatives of high officials of DRDO as owners, as board of directors or acting as partners in the firms or contractors to whom DRDO has been giving regular supply orders.

(iv)    Acts and omissions of corruption of any kind in tendering procedures for supply of stores and hiring of services and manpower in DRDO.

(v)     Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of submitting inflated bills, of the store item purchased or the services hired, to the offices of DCDA (R&D).

(vi)    Acts and omissions of corruption involving the colorable exercise of authority to abuse and misuse the authority vested in the capacity of senior government functionary for vested interests with regard to
purchase of stores and hiring of services and manpower.

(vii)   Acts and omissions of corruption involving the cases of corruption in the form of misplaced sense of economy in purchasing stores and hiring services and manpower in DRDO.

(viii) Acts and omissions of corruption involving any other kind of financial impropriety.

9.      Corruption in awarding DRDO chair, chairman of the boards of DRDO and DRDO fellow

(i)      Acts and omissions of corruption for initiating processing and approving the proposal for awarding DRDO chair, chairmanship of the various boards of DRDO and DRDO fellowship to undeserving candidates by misrepresenting material facts.

(ii)     Acts and omissions of corruption done by the serving senior scientists of DRDO HQ in the form of quid-pro-quo to those retired scientists in the form of awarding DRDO chair, chairmanship of the various boards and DRDO fellowship who gave clean chit in the corruption cases against the serving senior scientists.

(iii)    Acts and omissions of corruption for initiating proposals to remove the age limit of 70 years for DRDO chair to give undue advantage to chosen retired scientists like SK Salwan.

(iv)    Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of giving DRDO chair to those retired chairman of RAC who was involved in rule making activity illegally for assessment of scientist F for promotion to the post of scientist G in 2011.

10.     Corruption in the form of misleading the parliament of India

(i)      Acts and omissions of the corruption in the form of false report submitted to either house of parliament about the successfulness of the particular project which was actually not successful.

(ii)     Acts and omissions of the corruption in the form of giving false report to either house of the parliament with regard to involvement and entrusting of Admin & allied cadre responsibilities to the scientist and technical manpower of DRDO.

11.     Miscellaneous nature of corruption in DRDO

(i)      Acts and omissions of corruption in the nature of disobeying the direction of law by the senior officer of DRDO while acting in official capacity.

(ii)     Acts and omissions of corruption in the nature of breaching the trust of public in the capacity of public servants by senior scientist of DRDO violating their official capacity.

(iii)    Acts and omissions of corruption and criminal conspiracy to breach the trust of public in the capacity of public servant and to commit other criminal offences with common intention to do so.

(iv)    Acts and omissions of corruption in the nature of joining those private educational or commercial concerns by the retired senior scientist of DRDO within 01 year from retirement to whom DRDO have given funds and acted in collaboration with them.

(v)     Acts and omissions of corruption in the nature of embezzlement of govt. money in DRDO in whatever manner possible.

(vi)    Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of misappropriation of govt. money by twisting the material facts and acting in collusion.

(vii)   Acts and omissions of corruption in the nature of false claim of TA/DA and LTC by using flyer points and charging from the govt. exchequer in the name of LTC.

(viii) Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of drawing HRA illegally while residing in govt. guest houses by the very senior functionaries of DRDO.

(ix)    Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of using govt. vehicle for personal uses & showing them as official usage.

(x)     Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of weekly visiting native places situated at Hyderabad and Bangalore in the pretext of official duty and charging huge amount as air fare by the very senior scientist of DRDO HQ.

(ix)    Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of showing false expenses in other heads of accounts for actual expenses of lakhs of rupees incurred for liquor parties and lavish dance parties arranged every year and directors’ conference in Metcalfe House, Delhi and at Development Enclave, Delhi.

(x)     Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of acquiring and amassing disproportionate movable and immovable assets by the very senior scientists contrary to their known sources of income.

(xi)    Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of posting and retaining unauthorized Gazetted and non-Gazetted manpower of AFHQ cadre in DRDO HQ.

(xii)   Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of illegally posting AFHQ cadre officers in the labs of DRDO at Delhi.

(xiii) Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of creation of illegal and unauthorized designations in DRDO HQ and in the labs of DRDO without the authority/approval of Finance Ministry.

(xiv) Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of willful distraction and non-maintenance of the concerned record as per the provisions of public record act 1993 so as to avoid fixation of responsibility against the illegal acts of the very senior scientists of DRDO.

(xv)   Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of allotting govt. accommodation to non-eligible persons in DRDO’s own accommodation by the Estate Managers of the EMU of DRDO.

Don’t be afraid of anything, be bold and be knowledgeable in the sense that whoever has committed criminal offences of criminal conspiracy for committing breach of trust and using and issuing fake certificate or tampering in govt. records or indulging in criminal misconduct amounting to corruption for committing any kind of criminal offences can be caught and brought to the book at any time as per the provisions of IPC 1860, Cr. PC 1973 and prevention of corruption act 1988. There is no bar of limitation act in initiating criminal case by any person for committing criminal offences by the high serving and retired functionaries of DRDO. The only thing is important is that whatever information you provide to me should be verifiable from some independent govt. document whether in your custody or not and wherever available. Don’t think that particular case of corruption in DRDO in your knowledge is some 15 years or 20 years old. Documentary evidences created during ordinary transaction of official work in DRDO are like the guided missiles in which very senior scientist of DRDO are very expert. Don’t forget that the responsibility to eradicate corruption from DRDO lies on shoulders of every stakeholder. Please do contribute in this effort of nation building for which next progeny of ours will always remember us. Fellow honest citizens of this great country are the biggest stakeholder to eradicate corruption from DRDO.

JAIHIND

Drdo

DRDO violated the Article 309 by implementing interview in promotion of scientist F to scientist G grade in 2011 without proper amendment in SRO.

3 Comments

DRDO violated the Article 309 by implementing interview in promotion of scientist F to scientist G grade without proper amendment in SRO.

NO Assessment interview requirement for Promotion from scientist ‘F’ to Senior scientist ‘G’ as per the DRDO service rule-1979-Rule-8(2)(e) ; but Chairman, Recruitment and Assessment of DRDO forward name before promotion committee after “ INTERACTION ’’ .

What is the meaning of interaction and what is its need against the rule?  Nothing except the violation of law for corruption. UPSC conducted examinations for thousands participant for few seats then how RAC chairman want to stop the limited scientists opportunities to appear before the committee directly. Intention of Chairman is very clear.

Then Chairman, RAC Dr. P. S. Goel’s letter RAC/01/Assessment/PSG, dated 22-3-11 introduced this mechanism to give favor to incompetent few DRDO scientists  and for this act in return he got Prof. MGK Menon’s chair, RCI, Hyderabad  which fed him 84 lakhs per year. It is pure kick back or DRDO should prove the justification of his appointment.

What is this, is it not corruption? Best part of this type of corruption is money which he is receiving is poor tax payer’s money.

Question is, if he was competent authority to amendment of this kind of mechanism than why later DRDO amended this through Government of India gazette notification. He doesn’t have knowledge of the constitution of India, he is not competent authority to amend the  DRDS rules which are framed under Article 309 of  the constitution of India.

Where is law, where is administration, where is governance, it is happening in every stage in DRTC promotions also, where incompetent fake certificates holders are getting promotions and all relevant benefits, in recruitment of scientists lot of cases are exposed like Arun Kumar’s daughter, Selvamurty’s daughter, A K Bansal’ daughter and now several in queue like Narendra Kumar’s daughter, R B Singh’s son appointment are under lenses

Recently in CEPTAM recruitment   drive nearly 5 lakhs applications was received by CEPTAM, they made almost Rs 15 lakhs or more by introducing mandatory SMS registration, pure corruption by CEPTAM management god only knows who is patronizing this kind of corruption in DRDO. The 1 lakh applicant were rejected,  and thousands were not appeared due to examination center, CEPTAM did great job candidate who want center in nearby DELHI put him to Goa, Mizoram, Ajmer, Kolkata, Chennai etc.

RTI Request to DRDO

 
To                                                                                                                           9th September 2013
CPIO, DRDO HQ
Room No. 314A
DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg
New Delhi – 110105 

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of the  following

The amount of expenditure incurred on Internal Screening Committee ( Main ) held for promotion from the grade of Scientist `F` to the grade of Scientist`G`, under the following Heads separatelyfor the Year 2011,2012 and 2013

a)    TA/DA on the Chairman and Members of the Internal Screening Committee (Main).

b)    TA on the candidates ( Scientist `F`) who have appeared before the Internal Screening Committee ( Main )

c)    Miscellaneous Expenditure, i.e. other than above (a) and(b), on the Internal Screening Committee ( Main )

Find the application fee for the request attached with this application. If you feel that above requested information does not pertain to your department then please follow the provisions of Section 6(3) of the RTI Act, 2005/Also as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 please provide the details (Name and Designation) of the first appellate authority w.r.t to your department with the reply to the above request., where I may if required file my first appeal.
I do hereby declare that I am a citizen of India. Kindly provide me with the information at the address mentioned with the application. I request you to ensure that the information is provided before the expiry of the 30 day period after you have received the application.

Note: above required information is directly related to corruption and not come under schedule -II

The requested information is pertain to routine establishment / administrative matter which is not covered under exemption as decided by CIC (refer to CIC decision no CIC/LS/A/2012/002612 dated 22/03/2013).

There was no government approval for conducting ISC, main in assessment year 2011, and it was conducted illegally against the DRDS rules for the benefit to few incompetent scientists of their choice.

“Whoever does anything with the intention of causing wrongful gain to one person or wrongful loss to another is said to do that thing dishonesty”

Regards

PrabhuDandriyal
21-Sunderwal, Raipur, Dehradun -248008
0135-2787750 – 91-9411114879
prabhudoon@gmail.com, www.corruptionindrdo.com
psg1
psg2
 
RTI Request has been filed successfully on RTI Online Portal. The following are the details:-
Registration Number: MODEF/R/2013/60363
Name: Prabhu Dandriyal
Date of Filing: 10/09/2013
Request filed with: Department of Defence
Contact Details:-
Telephone Number: 23015187
Payment Details:-
RTI Fee Received: 10
Payment Mode: Internet Banking
SBI Reference number : IK33631057
Transaction Status: Successfull
Drdo

SF COMPLEX, JAGDALPUR, DRDO (PUBLIC MONEY GETTING MISUSED) OUTCOMES OF PUBLISHED MATTER IN CORRUPTION IN DRDO WEBSITE

3 Comments

16th September 2011

 Dear DRDO’s Friends

Please find following response from our SFCIAN, DRDO Complex, Jagdalpur. Now it is establish that if you put voice in genuine matters then DRDO management can’t ignore it, beside the corrupt official sitting there in top like DOP, Dr Arun Kumar have to take decision as per Government laid down rules and on the basis of humanitarian ground.

So keep it up and raise your voice against corruption, nepotism and favouritism prevailing in DRDO by all means but same time consider the national security also.

The Government has allowed us to speak about corruption, so don’t fear to expose corruption because the corruption is eating our organization like termite. The friends from all DRDO labs sharing their problems of harassments, victims of favouritisms like in this time the DRDO lab Directors did a very much unconstitutional act. In A-Par they reduced the marks in some cases more than 10 marks and increased more 10 marks to their favourite ones. Here the question arises, that how come a lab Director judge minutely the work done by DRTC staff instead of his immediate boss who is leading the project. It is clear cut conspiracy or act of sabotaging the projects undergoing in DRDO.

In RTI anyone ask these anomalies but on the other side I want to inform all you that in DRDO, DRDC meeting it is decided that the RTI activities are to be suppressed and also suppress representation practices, in this year at the last moment DRTC result was revaluated as per new unwritten guidelines they cut those name who were involved in any RTI’s / representations.

In one case of IRDE, Dehradun, the chairman of assessment board did not like the body language of candidate and declared unfit for promotion. The question is that the DRDO authorities who made these retired DRDO officials as chairman on the basis to oblige them are well versed about the proceeding of board. Nowhere is written about body language, or what to wear. This kind of examples is lame excuses to hide their ugly acts.

Dear friends this forum invites to send your RTI’s even without exposing your names, the only restraint is that the matter should be correct and not for a vindictive aim.  We, the team of www.corruptionindrdo.com, will take the issue up to highest authority.

Thanking you

Regards
Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008
Phone – 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
E-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com,  prabhu@dandriyal.com 
Website – www.corruptionindrdo.com 

Enclosed

SFCIAN’s letter to www.corruptionionindrdo.com

sf complex, JAGDALPUR, DRDO (public money getting misused)outcomes of published MATTER IN CORRUPTION IN DRDO WEBSITE

We are very thankful to you sir, for published matter of corruption that going on in SF Complex, Jagdalpur dated between 21-07-2011 to 29-07-2011.

The major outcome of published matter as per our observations is as follows:

  1. In that it was mentioned that GM’s (P.N.Tengli) favour scientist called tejasvi whenever he goes on TD to do GM’s personal Ph.D work he used to mention minimum 6-12 locations in single td.

observation:

WHEN THIS MATTER WAS PUBLISHED IN CORRUPTION IN DRDO WEBSITE,TEJASVI WAS IN TD FOR 12 LOCATIONS,BUT AS SOON AS IT AS PUBLISHED IN NET BOTH OF THEM GOT FEAR AND HE BREAK HIS TD IN HALFWAY & HE RETURENED BACK TO JAGDALPUR WHICH CLEARLY SHOWS BOTH ARE DOING REALLY MISCHIEF.

  1. To purchase GM’s required items GM has kept tejasvi as cash purchasing officer for last 3year and continuing now also which is completely against Govt.Rules(it is allowed only max 6months as per rule).

observation:

WHEN THIS MATTER WAS PUBLISHED IN CORRUPTION IN DRDO WEBSITE, IMMEDIATELY GM MADE OFFICE ORDER THAT TEJASVI HAS RELIEVED FROM CASH PURCHASE WHICH CLEARLY SHOWS BOTH ARE DOINE REALLY MISCHIEF IN CASE PURCHASE.

  1. GM is using hired luxury vehicle for daily travel to office of rental of RS.30, 000/- per month even though govt.allotted lalbadhi vehicle is available.

observation:

WHEN THIS MATTER WAS PUBLISHED IN CORRUPTION IN DRDO WEBSITE, IMMEDIATELY GM STARTED USING LALBADHI AGAIN WHICH CLEARLY SHOWS HE ACCEPTED HIS MISCHIEF.

WE ARE HAPPY THAT SOME CHANGE HAS BROUGHT UP BECAUSE OF PUBLISHEMENT IN YOUR WEBSITE.

BUT, WHAT & ALL THEY HAVE DONE MISCHIEF WITH GOVT.MONEY .i.e.,

a)    DEPOSITING CASH PURCHASE ADVNCE MONEY IN THEIR PERSONAL ACCOUNT AND WHAT & ALL THEY EARNED BY CASH PURCHASE.

b)    DONE THEIR PERSONAL WORKS (PH.D works) IN PUBLIC TAX MONEY.

c)    MISUTILISATION OF CSD MONEY AS THEIR PERSONEL MONEY & utilisation of csd money FOR LADIES CLUB IN WHICH HIS CLOSE OFFICERS WIFE ONLY ARE MEMBERS.

d)   MISUTILISATION OF GOVT.AWARDS BY BLUFFING GOVT. (BY MAKING FAKE DOCUMENTS) AND earning MONEY FROM THIS AWARD FOR THEIR PERSONEL BENEFITS WHERE REALLY DESERVED CANDIADATES ARE REALLY THERE.

e)    There is a rule that temple should not be constructed in govt.land. But, the existing GM since,he is an hindu,he is constructing temple & in the name of temple construction he is collecting fund from vendors and contractors for which there is no accountability.

note: 1.what people other than hindu will go for prayer?

2. giving money to ravi sankar pandit sort of saints only for getting darshan of him for them only which is an csd public money?what rights they are having to give money to saint for their own darshan from public money!

f)    threatening staffs that prohibition period will be increased if they are not listening to them and giving promotion to their favouring persons viloating eligible persons by holding hrd incharge post.

so,

  1. WHAT IS THE ACCOUNTABLITY FOR ABOVESAID MISCHIEFS & CORRUPTION? LIKE THIS THEY HAVE TO APPRECEIATED TO BECOME KING OF CORRUPTIONS ?

(OR)

THEY HAVE TO BE PUNISHED?

  1. WHETHER GOVT.WILL TAKE SOME ACTION AGAINST TEHM TO MAKE THEM ALLRIGHT?

(OR)

WHETHER DRDO WILL GROW IN THIS CORRUPTION ENVIRONEMENT FOR DEVELOPING DEFENSIVE PRODUCTS FOR NATIONAL PROTECTION?

IT IS BIG QUESTION?????????????

yes! Govt has to take necessary action for all above-said because

 It is involved

Public tax money! Public tax money! Public tax money!

&

Hence,

Please save public money!

-C.

 FROM 
SF COMPLEX,
DRDO, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE,
AIRPORT TERMINAL BUILDING,
JAGDALPUR,
CHATTISGARGH-494001.
PH.NO:07867-289461-65.
FAX.NO:07867-289466.
Drdo

Letter from A L S & Admin Asstt.s DRDO HQRs

2 Comments

Kind Attention: Dr V K Saraswat, SA to RM

                         : Prof. S K Salwan, Chairman Inquiry Committee

                         : Sh Avinash Chander, CCR&D(MSS), Member Inquiry Committee

Letter from A L S & Admin Asstt.s DRDO HQRs

Dear Shri Dandriyal Ji,

Namashkar,

We appreciate your efforts to bring out website relating to DRDO. We congratulate you for good work initiated.

We have also gone through the letters speaking about DOP. This is to bring in your notice that this DOP is very helping to juniors like us. Anybody can meet him and get his difficulties removed.

Certain senior persons like CC’s are not very happy because of his positive attitude towards junior officers. Dr. Neelam Bhalla, Sc. F is also blaming and complaining against him for not getting promotion and also for her transfer done by higher authorities. We came to know that DOP’s daughter has been the gold medalist form Delhi University. Since we are in HQRs and we know DOPs behavior towards us that is why we informed you. Rest you know better what to do.

We will request you to keep the momento so that objective is achieved

With regards,

Yours sincerely

A L S & Admin Asstt.s

DRDO HQRs

The above letter I have received on 4th June by ordinary post.

My friends of ALS & Admin DRDO, thanks for your appreciation and encouragement of my humble effort to improve the work atmosphere of DRDO.

I have been and born and brought in DRDO  environment, I have witnessed the drastic downfall of DRDO working environment. DRDS and DRTC laid down the path of corruption and nepotism. The whole workforce of DRDO turned un-productive by imported NRI’s who were inducted time to time in DRDO main stream.  They simply used their management skills to give direction to HR and technical force to engage in corruption and nepotism, so the One Lakh Corers infrastructure and the mighty Thirty Thousand scientific and Technical manpower may become unproductive and remain busy with day to day survival affairs like rat race of promotions & awards etc.

I am not fighting with any individual of DRDO  official but you people just think if your deserving daughter and son was also an eligible candidate for the Scientist B and Dr Arun Kumar misused his power and did all kind of manipulation to give appointment to his daughter. Because of his act, your son/daughter was deprived to get appointment and then what was your reaction. Please think of other eligible candidates who were more deserving and needier then corrupt Arun Kumar’s daughter.

  1. The sanction list of 129 posts of scientist B was not having stream of Environment Biology.
  2.  Arun Kumar tried to get consent from Director DRDE that environment biology candidate can be adjusted in Biotechnology but the fax massage I have seen that shows negative comments of Director, DRDE.
  3. Then he tried to get same advice from Director DIPAS but he also refused by fax but by pressure he wrote few lines in his own handwriting that with some minor course it can be consider. But it was all fake comments.
  4. You can see the list and marks of eligible candidates they are far better. The screening committee was designed and approved by Arun Kumar.
  5. The Board was design and approved by Arun Kumar and the best part of the board was the faculty of Environmental Biology was the board member. The honorable Supreme Court had already passed the order if the faculty or guide of any candidate is board member the selection of such candidate is invalid.
  6. If you people see the whole process of Arun Kumar’s Daughter’s selection even lay man can sense the manipulations.
  7. If you people check the seniority of Scientist C you will find now Arun Kumar forged the roll and put her daughter qualification as MSc Biotechnology. If everything is fine then what is the reason to forge the seniority role.
  8. The helpfulness of Arun Kumar, I have observed in the case of Dharmender Kumar, but the corruption behind the scene you people not want to see.
  9.  Prof. S K Salwan who is chairman of committee investigating the DOP, Arun Kumar case is made chairman of ‘NAGARATANAM’ project having annual budget of Rs. 80 Lakhs and having monthly salary of Rs. 1 Lakh. He is favoring Arun Kumar with the help of SA to RM
  10. As Arun kumar helped Prof. S K Salwan in getting this job how can he make a impartial inquiry of his case. Other person member of inquiry Avinash Chander was made CCR&D(MSS) so he is also helping him.
  11. The officer V P Pande, Jt. Dir, DOP is given direction by DOP to manipulate the case file of DOP’s daughter, extension file and Dharmender’s case.
  12. Prof. S. K. Salwan is staying at DRDO Guest house at Development Enclave in Delhi Cantt, Where SA to RM is also staying. There Prof. S. K. Salwan is staying along with his mentally retarded only son. His son is taken care by DRDO guest house staff and in return he is helping to dilute the DOP’s daughter case inquiry.

Now my friends of DRDO if you know any above information is wrong then please send me the correct information and advise me and help me to expose the corrupt official of DRDO,  so that DRDO may take a new shape of productive hand of Indian Defence and we will be proud as part of  country’s asset.

Regards

 Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal                                                                                                    21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008Phone – 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,         E-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com ,  prabhu@dandriyal.com Website – www.corruptionindrdo.com

Copy to

1.  Defence Minister, Room No -104, South Block, New Delhi – 110011