Tag Archives: RTI Act 2005

Drdo

RTI- Science Congress Mumbai

1 Comment
To,
Dr. RB Sharma, Scientist ‘F’
Central Public Information Officer
DRDO HQ, Min. of Defence
Room No. 314-A, RTI Cell
DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg
New Delhi-110011                                          

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of the visit of DRDO officials in Indian Science Congress , Mumbai. Following 13 Scientists/TOs of DMSRDE, Kanpur attended the Indian Science Congress.

 

SN Name Rank Departure Date Return Date Mode of Journey
1. Dr. A.K. Saxena Director 01 Jan 2015 08 Jan 2015 Flight
2. Dr. D.N. Tripathi Sc ‘F’ 01 Jan 2015 08 Jan 2015 Flight
3. Dr. Vineeta Nigam Sc ‘E’ 01 Jan 2015 08 Jan 2015 Flight
4. Dr. D.S. Bag Sc ‘F’ 01 Jan 2015 08 Jan 2015 Train
5. Mr. Amit Saraiya Sc ‘E’ 01 Jan 2015 08 Jan 2015 Train
6. Mr. AK Sc ‘D’ 01 Jan 2015 08 Jan 2015 Train
7. Mr. Mrituanjay K. Pandey Sc ‘C’ 01 Jan 2015 08 Jan 2015 Train
8. Mr. J.P. Singh Sc ‘C’ 01 Jan 2015 08 Jan 2015 Train
9. Mr. Rajesh Kumar Jaish TO ‘C’ 01 Jan 2015 08 Jan 2015 Train
10  Mr. Harjeet Singh TO ‘C’ 01 Jan 2015 08 Jan 2015 Train
11 Mr. A.K. Bajpai TO ‘C’ 01 Jan 2015 08 Jan 2015 Train
12. Mr. Sheel Kumar Porwal TO ‘B’ 01 Jan 2015 08 Jan 2015 Train
13. Mr. Devi Prasad Shukla TO 01 Jan 2015 08 Jan 2015 Train

 

Kindly provide following information.

  1. Number of lecture given by DMSRDE Scientists, number of product displayed by DMSRDE.
  2. Total Expenditure incurred by MSRDE for above said visit.
  3. Number of lectures, presentations given by DRDO officials.
  4. Number of Scientists that visited Indian Science Congress during previous science congress from DMSRDE, Kanpur.
  5. Total officials that were permitted by DRDO HQ to visit Indian Science Congress, Mumbai from

Information sought is pertaining to misuse of power and Corruption & not exempted u/s 24 of RTI Act 2005.

Regards

Prabhu  Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur,
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website www.corruptionindrdo.com

Registration Number     MODEF/R/2015/60137

Drdo

Role model and an inspiration for women scientist’s husband appointment case

Leave a comment

DRDO advertised RAC Advt No. 110, December 2012 for the post of Scientist ‘G’ specially to accommodate CMDR S K Patel Husband of Ms Tessy Thomas but unfortunately due to lot of  resistance from DRDO senior scientists Sh Avinash Chander could not succeeded to obliged ? as he was not the big boss that time and Dr V K Sarswat turned down the case and thus RAC Advt No. 110 for Scientist ‘G’ mere wasted.

DRDO advertised RAC Advt No. 112/ October 2013 for the post of Scientist ‘G, this time  Sh Avinash Chander was boss and ignoring 485 available scientists G, CMDR(Retd.) S K Patel husband of Ms Tessy Thomas was selected and he joined DRDO as Scientist ‘G’ on 27 March 2014. He was appointed as Director in Directorate of QRS(DQRS) on 31 March 2014″ at DQ, DQRS as Director. The all eligible and more experienced DRDO scientists who are grown with DRDO Missile program now blowing the trumpet – Mera Kya, Mujhe Kya

 
To,                                                                                                  12th September 2014
Dr. RB Sharma,
Scientist ‘F’ & Central Public Information Officer
DRDO HQ,
Room No. 314-A, RTI Cell
DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg
New Delhi-110011                 

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect  of following

  1. RAC Advt No. 110, December 2012 under direct recruitment scheme for recruitment of 01 Scientist G (Lab: DRDO, Subject: Mechanical Engineering, Essential Qualification: At least first class Bachelor’s Degree in Mechanical Engineering from a recognized University or equivalent, Experience / Specialisation: Experience in the field of Quality, Reliability and Safety management of weapons and Armament Systems with involvement during development/ production/ induction and life cycle management. Knowledge of guided weapons is also desirable) and
  2. RAC Advt No. 112/ October 2013 under direct recruitment scheme for recruitment of 01 Scientist G (Lab: DQRS,DRDO, Essential Qualification: At least First class Bachelors Degree in Engg./Technology in Mechanical Engg./Aeronautical Engg./ Electrical Engg./Electronics & Communication Engg. only; from a recognized University, Experience / Specialization: At least 15 years experience in areas of quality planning, quality assurance, quality control, and quality improvements related to weapons/sensors/combat vehicles/armaments).

Kindly provide following information under Section 6 of RTI Act 2005.

I.            With reference to RAC Advt No. 110/December 2012

  1. The name of candidate/scientist selected as Scientist G.
  2. The list of candidates with credentials that shortlisted and appeared in Interview.
  3. The list of chairman & members of selection board for Interview.
  4. Name of the Lab/Estt where the said recruited Scientist G was posted.
  1. With reference to RAC Advt No. 112/October 2013
  2. The name of candidate/scientist selected as Scientist G.
  3. The list of candidates with credentials that shortlisted and appeared in Interview.
  4. The list of chairman & members of selection board for Interview.
  5. Name of the Lab/Estt where the said recruited Scientist G was posted

The abuse/misuse of power for personal gain is corruption. The information sought in this RTI Application pertains to allegations of corruption and as such not exempted u/s 24(1) of the RTI Act 2005.

Regards
 
Prabhu  Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun -248008 
0135- 2787750,   9411114879,  
prabhudoon@gmail.com    www.corruptionindrdo.com

  Registration Number  MODEF/R/2014/61666

Scientist G tailor made advertisement for CMDR S K Patel (Ms Tessy Thomas's Husband)
Scientist G tailor made advertisement for CMDR S K Patel (Ms Tessy Thomas’s Husband)
Drdo

RTI -Dr. V. Bhujanga Rao, DS & Director General – Naval Systems and Materials (NS & M) – PATENT

1 Comment
To,                                                                                                                              28th July 2014
Dr. RB Sharma, CPIO
DRDO HQ, Min. of Defence
DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg
New Delhi-110011                             

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of Dr. V. Bhujanga Rao, DS & Director General – Naval Systems and Materials (NS & M). As per news publish on 31 Dec 2011 in The Hindu “Mr Rao has a patent Infra Red Signature Suppression (IRSS) device, which helps in evading attack by Infra Red Seeker Missiles” Copy enclosed. As per patent search it is found that the patent application deemed to be withdrawn u/s 11B (4) Copy enclosed. As per DRDO website PATENT, Infra Red Signature Suppression (IRSS) Device, For Fitment at Exhaust of Diesel Engine of Ship to Evade Attack by Infra Red Seeker Missiles. (Patent Application: 0123/Del/2005 A, Filling date: 19-01-2005 Publication date: 10-11-2006) 30 number of Ships have been fitted with this Device. As per patent application six names are there as inventor and second name VEPAKOMMA BHUJANGA RAO. Copy enclose

  1. Provide the present status of this patent application no 0123/Del/2005 filed by DRDO.
  2. If patent approved by apex body of government of India than copy of patent approval or reference of approval.
  3. If patent application withdrawn then copy of approval from competent authority to information on DRDO website regarding patent claim.
  4. Provide the date of withdrawn patent application and reasons of withdrawn.

Note: the requested information is not come under exemption of schedule –II of RTI Act 2005. Since, March 2014 end DRDO stopped to provide information under shadow of exemption. Section 177 in IPC Furnishing false information. Whoever, being legally bound to furnish information on any subject to any public servant, as such, furnishes, as true, information on the subject which he knows or has reason to believe to be false, shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both. So  before denial of information your point wise explanation is required that the matter not pertain under corruption.

Regards

Prabhu  Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur,
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website www.corruptionindrdo.com

Registration Number            MODEF/R/2014/61345

Patent applied - Patent granted ?
Patent applied – Patent granted ?

Patent statuspatents act 1970 11B

Biodata of Dr. V. Bhujanga Rao in DRDO website

http://www.drdo.gov.in/drdo/English/index.jsp?pg=chiefcontrollers-bhujanga-dg.jsp 

Dr. V. Bhujanga Rao, DS & Director General – Naval Systems and Materials (NS & M)

PATENT

Infra Red Signature Suppression (IRSS) Device:

For Fitment at Exhaust of Diesel Engine of Ship to Evade Attack by Infra Red Seeker Missiles. (Patent Application: 0123/Del/2005 A, Filling date: 19-01-2005 Publication date: 10-11-2006) 30 number of Ships have been fitted with this Device.

Patent Application bhujang rao
Patent Application bhujang rao
Drdo

Request to provide facility of filing online RTI applications for DRDO

3 Comments
To                                                                                                     13th June 2014
Sh. Narendra Modi,
Prime Minister,
Room No – 152, PMO,
South Block, NEW DELHI -110011

Subject: Request to provide facility of filing online RTI applications for DRDO and give directive to DRDO to Honor the RTI act 2005 in right spirit to promote transparency and accountability in the working of every public authority.

Reference:     (i)  My letter dated 16 April 2014 to Prime Minister with subject        “Unconstitutional act of DoPT officials who are managing the Online RTI Portal and supporting corrupt officers of DRDO”

                     (ii)   PMO reply ID No. 10/3/2014-PMP1/30140 dated 19th May 2014

                     (iii)    DoPT Letter No.6/1/2014-IR dated 6/6/2014 copy to Sh Kaushal                                          Kishor Pandey, SO,  PMO, New Delhi

 

Honorable Sir,

  1.  www.corruptionindrdo.com continues to expose the corruption/nepotism prevailing in DRDO since the last four years. DRDO’s honest officials send corruption inputs from all DRDO establishments and with help of RTI’s and from internet information, the corruption inputs are regularly passed to the government and relevant agencies like CVC, IB, CBI etc.
  2. www.corruptionindrdo.com’s efforts recognized by honest officials of DRDO and website regularly getting corruption/nepotism inputs from each and every corner of the country. On basis of the points raised by the website, DRDO also took several corrective measures and constituted inquiry committees for examining the truths.
  3. In my 16th April 2014 letter I have requested Honorable Prime Minister to kindly take appropriate corrective measures against officials who are involved in unconstitutional acts and give strength to RTI- Act 2005. It has really empowered the common man. Also, fix those who are diluting the effectiveness of  the strong RTI Act -2005.
  4. The online RTI portal “Guideline – An applicant who desires to obtain any information under the RTI Act 2005 can make a request through this RTI Online Portal to only the Central Public Authorities of main Ministries/Departments located at New Delhi initially”. In the first phase, this facility is available to Ministries/Departments/Apex Bodies mentioned in the list available in ‘GUIDELINES’, but there is no list available in RTI portal. Like Defence Ministry having several offices in  New Delhi
  5. Sir, I have received a letter from DoPT Letter No.6/1/2014-IR dated 6/6/2014 copy to Sh Kaushal Kishor Pandey, SO, PMO, New Delhi in respect of reply my letter dated 16 April 2014 to Prime Minister with subject “Unconstitutional act of DoPT officials who are managing the Online RTI Portal and supporting corrupt officers of DRDO”
  6. In DoPT letter Sh R K Girdhar, Under Secretary (RTI) stated that “if you not satisfied with the reply of CPIO, may filed appeal before the first appellate authority in the same public authority u/s 19(i) of the RTI Act 2005” it seems that the letter forwarded by PMO was not even read by Sh R K Girdhar. It shows the seriousness of DoPT regarding RTI issues or Sh R K Girdhar just trying to shield the nodal officer.
  7. I have enclosed the remark of nodal officer not CPIO that they have returned with “You have filed more than 40 online RTI applications relating to DRDO on the address of Department of Defence which has been physically transferred to DRDO under intimation to you. DRDO is a separate public authority and is also placed under Second Schedule of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, your online RTI applications seeking information in r/o the DRDO and sent to Department of Defence will not be acted upon henceforth. You may directly send your application to the DRDO for the information.”
  8. Sh R K Girdhar, just overlooked the letter contents and send regular fixed reply without applying any mind. I don’t know RTI Act 2005 is a serious responsibility or just for feeding papers.
  9. Sir, after exposing the corruption / nepotism of DRDO’s senior officials because RTI Act-2005. Some officials suspended, some got charge sheet and some are in queue. Now DRDO officials are trying to make a wall for RTI Act 2005. Recently an unconstitutional letter issued by Dr. R B Sharma, CPIO, DRDO, Hqrs Cell on 8th March 2014 to all establishment/Lab show that they clearly made their policy not to give any RTI reply. (Copy enclosed) As per Sh R K Girdhar in one RTI reply in reference to that “any CPIO can compel to other CPIO not to give information under RTI” he stated that “There is no such policy of compelling or a CPIO being compelled by other PIO for not providing information to the information seeker. A PIO can be penalized by Information Commission under Section 20 of the RTI Act, 2005.”
  10. Further in 28th May 2005 a meeting was held under DRDO transparency officer Dr. Sudershan Kumar, DS and CC R&D (PC & SI). In that he told to all DRDO’s CPIO not to supply any information under RTI Act-2005. It can be verified by records of DRDO RTI cell that no information was passed after this decision to any RTI applicant.
  11. DRDO is in neck deep corruption/ nepotism/ favoritism and the reason being this DRDO is unproductive since last 15-20 years, don’t believe their data and dabas because when our forces will be ready to accept those then only our country will believe on DRDO, otherwise it will  be only ok for 26 January  republic show  tableau .
  12. In view of the above, I request you Sir, the RTI is the only effective way to restrict corruption in DRDO. Please give directives to DRDO & DoPT to honor the RTI act 2005 in the right spiritto promote transparency and accountability in the working of every public authority.

 

Regards
 
Prabhu Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur
Dehradun-248008
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com, website www.corruptionindrdo.com
 
Enclosed: 1.    My letter dated 16 April 2014 to Prime Minister
                     2.    PMO reply ID No. 10/3/2014-PMP1/30140 dated 19th May 2014
                     3.    DoPT Letter No.6/1/2014-IR dated 6/6/2014
                    4.   Dr. R B Sharma, CPIO, DRDO, Hqrs Cell letter No RTI 04/2091/ P/ Policy dated 8th March 2014
 
Copy to –DR. SYAMAL KUMAR SARKAR,SECRETARY (P), Room No 112, North Block, New Delhi -110001DoPT reply 6 june 2014
PMO reply 19 may 2014
 
 
rti cell letter 8 march 2014
Drdo

DRDO RTI Cell Trying to take shelter of High Court Order

Leave a comment

DRDO RTI cell doing propaganda that Honorable High Court declared DRDO 100%   exempted  organization from RTI Act-2005 and started giving denial  to each and every RTI request without seeing the merit and facts that the request pertain to corruption. And best part of this now they are stop writing “except information pertaining to the allegations of corruption and human rights violations”

RTI cell including First appellate authority also cited the Delhi High Court Judgment passed in WP © 83/2014 DR. NEELAM BHALLA .. Petitioner Through: Mr. R. Sathish, Advocate. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..Respondents Through: Mr. Neeraj Chaudhari, Advocate for R-1 and 2.

In this judgment is nothing new every one clearly knows DRDO was an exempted organization under Section 24 of the Right to Information Act, 2005. In other words, the Act would apply to DRDO only to the extent of information pertaining to allegations of corruption and human rights violations.

In DR. NEELAM BHALLA case  DR. NEELAM BHALLA  prayer to honorable court that information supplied by then CPIO, DRDO  Sh Bundella was incorrect and inaccurate and court says

“4. It is a matter of fact that Shri Bundela had provided inaccurate and incorrect information to the appellant but Shri Bundela’s contention that he had transmitted information as received by him from CPIO of RAC cannot be disregarded. It is important to bear in mind that Shri Bundela was not the holder of information. The holder of information was CPIO, RAC. Whatever information was W.P.(C) No. 83/2014 Page 1 of 4 forwarded to Shri Bundela by CPIO, RAC, he transmitted the same to the appellant.

6. Even so, before parting with this matter, I would like to caution Shri Bundela to exercise due diligence in responding to the RTI application in future.”

4. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is of the view that once the CIC has held that DRDO is an exempted organisation under Section 24 of RTI Act and the information sought does not pertain to corruption and/or human rights violation, it was not open to the CIC to carve out any further exemption.

But in whole judgment there is nothing new and not giving extra immunizing to DRDO from RTI act, if there is any extra facilitation in judgment than DRDO should quote specifically that.

  1. DRDO RTI cell also go through the judgment of  CWP No. 12904 of 2009

In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE  MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR

under Section 24(4) of the Act which envisaged that nothing contained in this Act shall apply to such intelligence and security organizations A combined reading of these provisions would reveal, only that information is exempted, which is directly effecting and co-related to the “Intelligence” and “Security” of that organization of the State and not otherwise.

The matters pertaining to recruitment/appointments and day to day administrative nature information, where it is also found that DRDO top officials did lot of irregularities. Therefore honorable defence minister approved CBI intervention against 10 top DRDO officials including 2 ex- DRDO chiefs one Dr V K Saraswat and other one Sh M Natrajan  for their ugly acts.

It was establish facts till date all senior officials of DRDO who were fixed by CVC and CVO, MOD were exposed with the help of RTI’s only.

So DRDO officials are afraid of RTI’s if they are honest then why they worries from RTI’s . The Ex CPIO, DRDO Dr A K Tyagi who is facing charge sheet in corruption case was the big manipulator and protector of corrupt officials.

I request to DRDO RTI cell you people are serving to our nation; please not to protect culprit’s corrupt officers, your younger generation will ask you what did you contributed for justice. Now in the age of IT revolution era kid can explore what are the score of my grandpa, because these documents are alive forever.

I want to appeal all information seeker from DRDO please don’t dishearten from these act of these corrupt DRDO officials who are taking false shelter.

Please mail/post/send ordinary dak all your queries to www.corruptionindrdo.com postal address or mail address, we will took the matter up to higher ups. We are also planning to filled a PIL for request supreme court for delist the name of DRDO from Second Schedule of RTI Act 2005. As we collected lot of of informations from all over the country.

regrads
www.corruptionindrdo.com
prabhudoon@gmail.com
21- Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun- 248001
Drdo

RTI- Dr. Ajay Kumar Singh – Singh is Kingh

6 Comments
To,                                                                                      31st March 2014
Dr. RB Sharma, CPIO
DRDO HQ, Min. of Defence
DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg
New Delhi-110011                             

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect  of Dr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Scientist  G  is presently holding the charge of DOP, DRDO  at DRDO HQ. He is holding following post in DRDO since January 2007. Details are given as under:

SN    Post                                                 Duration                           Directorate
1.      Staff Officer to CC(R&D) (HR) – Oct 2004- Dec 2006            DRDO HQ, DRDO,
2.      Director                                            Jan  2007 – Sep 2010        CEPTAM, DRDO,  
3.      Director                                            Oct 2010 – 27 Feb 2013   Dte. of  HRD, DRDO HQ,
4.     Director                                           28 Feb 2013 – till date      DOP, DRDO HQ    
Note:     He was holding the charge of two Directorates as Director, DHRD & Director, DOP from 01 Dec 2012 to 27 Feb 2013

In reference to the above kindly provide the following information under RTI Act 2005.

  1. Procedure/Guidelines/Rules for appointment of Directors in Corporate Directorate/RAC/CEPTAM, DRDO duly approved by DOPT, Government of India.
  2. Criteria for appointment of Directors in Corporate Directorate/RAC/CEPTAM (Seniority/Administrative & Management skill, qualification & experience etc.)
  3. Charter of Duties & Nature of work  carried out by Scientist appointed as:
          I.            Staff Officer to Chief Controller R&D(HR)
        II.            Director, CEPTAM
      III.            Director, DHRD
      IV.            Director, DOP
  1. File noting for appointment of Dr. Ajay Kumar Singh as Staff Officer to CCR&D (HR) & copy of appointment order
  2. File noting for appointment of Dr. Ajay Kumar Singh as Director, CEPTAM & copy of his appointment order
  3. File noting for appointment of Dr. Ajay Kumar Singh as Director, DHRD, DRDO HQ & copy of his appointment order
  4. File noting for appointment of Dr. Ajay Kumar Singh as Director, DOP & copy of his appointment order
  5. List of Scientist considered in the appointment of following post by DRDO Hqrs.
  6. Administrative & Managerial Experience and Educational Qualification of Dr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Scientist F as on Jan 2007 when he was appointed as Director, CEPTAM, DRDO.
  1. Director, CEPTAM  Jan 2007- Sept 2010
  2. Director, DHRD  Oct 2010- Feb 2013
  3. Director, DOP  March 2013- Jan 2014

NOTE – Matter is directly related to corruption and not exempted under Section 24 (1) because  Dr. Ajay Kumar Singh as Director, DHRD was part & parcel of implementing interview in promotion of scientist F to scientist G grade without proper amendment in SRO ( Violation of Article 309).  He was also one of the candidates for scientist F to scientist G promotion in year 2011 assessment.

  1. Please refer CIC decision in File No. CIC/LS/A/2012/002612 dated 22.3.2013 (Dr. Neelam Bhalla Vs. DRDO)-  
  2. Information asked is on Establishment Matter and not exempted u/s 24 of RTI Act as per various decisions of CIC.

Regards

Prabhu  Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun -248008 
0135- 2787750,   9411114879,  
prabhudoon@gmail.com    www.corruptionindrdo.com

 

Registration Number    MODEF/R/2014/60617       

Drdo

RTI- DMSRDE- CARS Project

2 Comments
To                                                                                       19th March 2014
Central Public Information Officer,
DMSRDE,  DRDO,  Min of Defence,
GT Road, Kanpur-208013

Hello
Kindly provide me with the following information under purview of RTI Act 2005. DRDO is having Centre for Acquisition for Research Services (CARS) for partnership with Academic Institution in R&D projects/ programmes/basic research activities. Funding of academic institution for research whose expected outcome was judged to be of use in extent DRDO R& D projects/programmes. Instrumentality was the sponsored research proposal instigated by a DRDO laboratory or vetted by it for direct relevance of research outcome(s).

Director, DMSRDE granted several projects/programmes under CARs of DRDO to various academic institution/University/IITs/private industries etc.

Kindly provide following information

  1. Name & Designation of Sanctioning Authority for CARS Project in DMSRDE, Kanpur.
  2. Copy of delegation of financial powers of Director, DMSRDE for sanctioning CARS project.
  3. Provide details of the CARS projects given by DMSRDE, Kanpur to other research organizations/academic institutions etc for FY  2011-2012 &  2012-2013 in the following format:

SN/ Financial year/CARS Project Title & PDC/Institution getting CARS project/ Sanctioned amount & PDC/ Name & Rank of Investigator 

  1. Number of CARS projects that have been completed up to DMSRDE satisfaction till 28th Feb 2014.
  2. The details of the equipment purchased by the research service provider and the status of their submitting back to DMSRDE, Kanpur.
  3. Details of CARS projects given to Dr. Arvind Dixit, VSSD College, Kanpur with details of sanction amount & PDC and names of project team.
  4. Copy of Contract & Terms & Conditions of CARS projects sanctioned by Director, DMSRDE to Dr. Arvind Dixit, VSSD College, Kanpur.
  5. Details of items (Chemicals, Glassware, Instruments etc) transferred to Dr. Arvind Dixit, VSSD College, Kanpur from Rubber & Adhesive Division by Dr. D.N. Tripathi, Scientist F and Mr. A.S. Parihar, Scientist D under CARS project sanctioned to Dr. Arvind Dixit ,VSSD College, Kanpur with cost, quantity and date of transfer of items.
  6. Total cost of items that were transferred /handed over by Mr. A.S. Parihar, Scientist ‘D’, DMSRDE to Dr. Arvind Dixit, VSSD, College, Kanpur under CARS project sanctioned to VSSD College, Kanpur.
  7. Whether the cost of items handed over by DMSRDE, Kanpur to Dr. Arvind Dixit , VSSD College Kanpur under CARS project was included in sanctioned cost of CARS project. (Yes/No)

The information sought pertains to misuse of official capacity of Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena, Director, DMSRDE and falls under the ambit of corruption, therefore not exempted u/s (24) of RTI Act 2005.

Regards
Prabhu  Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website www.corruptionindrdo.com

Registration Number     –  MODEF/R/2014/60556

Drdo

RTI- DMSRDE – Library Procurement

Leave a comment
To,                                                                                                       5th March 2014
Central Public Information Officer,
DMSRDE, DRDO, Min of Defence,
GT Road, Kanpur-208013

                  

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information under purview of RTI Act 2005

Please refer following letters & CIC decision:

  1. DMS/0369/RTI/101/41/Letter_2013 dated 26 August 2013, DMS/0369/RTI/ 101/76/Letter_2013 dated 30 October  2013 & DMS/0369/RTI/FAR/2013/0013 dated 14 Nov  2013 issued by CPIO, DMSRDE, Kanpur
  2. RTI/02/2091/F/2013/0142 dated 14 Oct 2013 issued by FAA, DRDO HQ
  3. c.       CIC decision in F No. CIC/LS/A/2012/001219 dated 09 August 2012 : Rajiv Chauhan Vs DRDO
  4. RTI/02/P/2091/CIC/2012/001219 dated 25 Sep 2012 from RTI Cell, DRDO HQ, New Delhi

In light of the above, kindly provide following information under Section 6(1) of RTI Act 2005.

  1. Copy of Audit report of LTA party-IV O.L. No. 13 dt. 7.3.2008 ‘Delayed delivery of Journals worth Rs. 28.61 Lakhs’.
  2. Purchase Manual/Purchase Rules of DRDO that were used for Procurement of Printed Journals in year 2011 & 2012 at DMSRDE, Kanpur.
  3. With reference to DMSRDE Tender Notice with Tender Number DMSRDE/12TIC009 with name of the item “Subscription (Yearly)   for Printed Journals Year 2012”  provide the following information:

i.            Copy of TPC/NC Minutes

ii.            Copy of Supply Order

iii.            The dates on which supply of printed journals received at  DMSRDE, Kanpur

iv.            Copies of bill submitted by Vendor/Supplier

  1. With reference to DMSRDE Tender Notice with Tender Number DMSRDE/11TIC009 with name of the item “Subscription (Yearly)   for Printed Journals Year 2011”  provide the following information:

i.            Copy of TPC/NC Minutes

ii.            Copy of Supply Order

iii.            The dates on which supply of printed journals received at  DMSRDE, Kanpur

iv.            Copies of bill submitted by Vendor/Supplier

  1. Justification/Reasons for delayed supply of Printed Journals in Year 2011 & 2012.
  2. Whether Scientific/Technical projects/assignments/work of DMSRDE affected by delayed supply of Printed Journals in the year 2011 & 2012.

The information sought pertains to Purchase Matter of Printed Journal and as such not exempted u/s (24) of RTI Act 2005.

Regards

Prabhu  Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur,
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website www.corruptionindrdo.com

 

Registration Number                        MODEF/R/2014/60443

Drdo

RTI – DMSRDE – Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena, Director, DMSRDE, Kanpur having own Rules for LDCE

7 Comments
 
To,                                                                   4th March 2014
Central Public Information Officer,
DMSRDE, DRDO, Min of Defence,
GT Road, Kanpur-208013

 

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information under purview of RTI Act 2005 in respect of Mr. Ajay Kishore Sharan, STA-B, DMSRDE, Kanpur.

Recruitment & Promotions in DRDO for DRTC are governed by DRDO Technical Cadre Recruitment Rules, 2000 notified vide number SRO 296 dated 05 December 2000 as amended framed by Ministry of Defence, Government of India. There is provision of recruitment of STA-B through LDCE under Rule 5(5) of DRDO Technical Cadre Recruitment Rules, 2000.

DMSRDE, Kanpur is an establishment under Materials Cluster of DRDO. LDCE 2012 for DRTC was conducted by DMSRDE for recruitment of STA -B and Mr. Ajay Kishore Sharan, STA -B (presently posted in Applied Chemistry Division, DMSRDE) was recruited on post of STA -B through LDCE 2012.

  1. Essential Qualification Requirement (EQR) pertaining to the post of STA -B for recruitment under LDCE 2012 at DMSRDE, Kanpur.
  2. Certified Copy of application submitted by Mr. Ajay Kishore Sharan for LDCE -2012
  3. Certified Copy of board proceeding of LDCE- 2012, DMSRDE, Kanpur including file noting for constitution of Selection Board for LDCE 2012 for DRTC by Director, DMSRDE.
  4. The composition of Selection Board for LDCE 2012 at DMSRDE for recruitment of STA ‘B’ under Rule 5(6) & Schedule IV of DRDO Technical Cadre Recruitment Rules, 2000 with name & rank of Chairperson & Members of Selection Board.
  5. Copy of recommendations of Selection Board after LDCE 2012 for recruitment of Mr. Ajay Kishore Sharan on the post of STA ‘B’ duly approved by Director, DMSRDE.
  6. Copy of appointment letter issued by Director, DMSRDE for recruitment of Mr. Ajay Kishore Sharan on post of STA ‘B’ after recruitment in LDCE 2012.
  7. Copy of the mark sheets & degree issued by the concerned Institution/University from which Mr. Ajay Kishore Sharan, STA ‘B’ achieved B.Sc. degree on the basis of which he was recruited on post of STA ‘B’ in LDCE 2012.
  8. Whether qualifying degree of Mr. Ajay Kishore Sharan, STA -Bfor appearing in LDCE 2012 was UGC recognized. (Yes/No)
  9. Whether any letter was sent to UGC regarding recognition of B.Sc. Psychology degree issued by Annamalai University under distance education. (Yes/No)
  10. If answer to point (9) is yes then provide copy of the letter sent to UGC, New Delhi from DMSRDE, Kanpur.
  11. Whether any confirmation achieved till date from UGC regarding recognition of  B.Sc. Psychology degree issued by Annamalai University under distance education. (Yes/No)
  12. Provide details of all candidates appeared in LDCE 2012 for the recruitment on post of STA -B in DMSRDE, Kanpur in following format.
  13. Any approval was taken from DRDO Hqrs for post of STA – B (B.Sc. Psychology) (Yes/No)

Note – It is alleged that Mr. Ajay Kishore Sharan, -B was recruited on post of STA ‘B’ through LDCE 2012 at DMSRDE, Kanpur on the basis of un recognized degree from UGC and his qualifying degree of B. Sc. Psychology is not covered under  Rule 5(5) and Schedule II of DRDO Technical Cadre Recruitment Rules, 2000.

The recruitment of Mr. Ajay Kishore Sharan is provisional on post of STA ‘B’.  Therefore the recruitment of Mr. Ajay Kishore Sharan, STA -B was made with gross violation of DRDO Technical Cadre Recruitment Rules, 2000 and Corruption by Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena, Director, DMSRDE, Kanpur.

The information sought pertains to misuse of power in official capacity of Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena, Director, DMSRDE and falls under the ambit of corruption, therefore not exempted u/s (24) of RTI Act 2005.

Regards

Prabhu  Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur,
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website www.corruptionindrdo.com

Registration Number            – MODEF/R/2014/60437

Drdo

RTI- DMSRDE

1 Comment
 To                                                                                  17th January 2014
Central Public Information Officer
DRDO, Ministry of Defence
DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg
Delhi-110054        

Hello,

Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of DMSRDE, Kanpur.

  1. Government of India constituted ‘National Investigation Agency’, (NIA) under ‘NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY ACT, 2008’.  Para 6. (2)Chapter-II of this act states that:
  • Subject to any orders which the Central Government may make in this behalf, officers of the Agency shall have throughout India in relation to the investigation of Scheduled Offences and arrest of persons concerned in such offences, all the powers, duties, privileges and liabilities which police officers have in connection with the investigation of offences committed therein.

2.   Para 6. (4)Chapter-II of this act states that:

  • Where the Central Government is of the opinion that the offence is a Scheduled Offence and it is a fit case to be investigated by the Agency, it shall direct the Agency to investigate the said offence.

3.    The Act clearly states that only Government of India can constitute any enquiry that is detrimental to the security of nation. In case of Ministry of Defence, only and only Defence Minister can refer such cases to ‘National Investigation Agency’, (NIA).

4.     Two separate interviews of Dr. A. K. Saxena, Director DMSRDE at Kanpur, have been published in a local Newspapers, “DANIK JAGRAN, Kanpur” and ‘HINDUSTAN, Kanpur” on 16 January 2014.  The clips of news are enclosed as ‘Annexure-I’ and ‘Annexure-II’. Kindly provide the following information u/s 6(1) of RTI Act 2005.

INFORMATION SOUGHT

  1. Has Dr. A. K. Saxena taken mandatory permission for this press briefing from either Director General (NS &M) or Director of ‘Directorate of Interface’? (YES/NO)?
  2. Please provide the copy of  permission letter from competent authority for briefing the press by Dr. A. K. Saxena, Director, DMSRDE, if any
  3. Please provide the copy of approval of competent authority of DRDO Hqrs for the statement of Dr. A. K. Saxena, Director, DMSRDE given to the news papers.
  4. Has the Minister of Defence referred any such case against some of employees of DMSRDE to NIA? (YES/NO)
  5. If the answer of query 1 is YES, then please provide a copy of such communication.
  6. If the answer of query 1 is NO, then has Dr. A. K. Saxena, Director DMSRDE Director misrepresented the facts in his press briefing to the correspondents of ‘Danik Jagran, Kanpur’ and ‘Hindustan, Kanpur’? (YES/NO)
  7. If the answer to query 3 is YES, please provide the rules and the details thereof that have been broken by Dr. A. K. Saxena.
  8. If the answer of query 4 is YES, then provide a copy of such communication.
  9. If the answer of query 4 is NO, has Dr. A K Saxena breached the rules, regulation and guidelines issued by ‘Directorate of Interface’ (YES/NO)?
  10. Keeping in view, ‘PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, 1988’’, ‘CENTRAL VIGILANCE ACT 2003’, recently passed ‘LOKPAL AND LOKAYUKTAS ACT 2013’ and pending PUBLIC INTEREST DISCLOSURE AND PROTECTION TO PERSONS MAKING THE DISCLOSURE BILL, 2010, Does any communication  on matter of CORRUPTION constitute passing of SECRET/CONFIDENTIAL information (YES/NO)?
  11. If the answer to query 8 is YES, has Dr. A K Saxena made a fictitious and false statement (YES/NO)?
  12. As claimed in the interviews by Dr. A K Saxena, has secret information has been leaked out by some scientists / employees of DMSRDE other than malpractices, subversion of purchase rules in the procurement of stores (YES/NO)?
  13. As claimed in the interviews by Dr. A K Saxena, has he communicated the list of scientists / employees of DMSRDE to Headquarters (YES/NO)?
  14. If the answer to query 11 is YES, please provide the names of these officers and employees.
  15. If the answer to query 8 is YES, please provide the details of secret information
  16. All the ACTS mentioned in Para-7, authorize the Head of an Organization, i.e., Scientific Advisor to Raksha Mantri to take suo-moto cognizance of CORRUPTION ISSUES. Has Scientific Advisor to Raksha Mantri taken suo-moto cognizance of corruption, subversion of DRDO PURCHASE MANUAL 2006 rules and regulation and the malpractices perpetuated  by Dr. A. K. Saxena, Director DMSRDE  (YES/NO)?
  17. If the answer of query 10 is YES, has an enquiry committee been formed to look into massive corruption perpetuated by Dr. A K Saxena in DMSRDE (YES/NO)?
  18. If the answer of query 11 is YES, then please provide the details of such enquiry committee, including chairman and all the members been
  19. If the answer to query 10 is NO, also that DRDO does not take suo-moto cognizance of CORRUPTION till the corrupt officer is caught red handed and arrested by CBI, than please provide the details of the existing mechanism for eradication of CORRUPTION MENACE in DRDO
  20. The information sought is pertaining to Establishment matter and as such not exempted u/s 24 of RTI Act 2005.
  21. This is to inform that Central Information Commission in its various decisions consistently held that establishment matters relating to the organization notified u/s 24 of the RTI Act come within the purview of the Act and information in this regard thereto are not exempted from disclosure.
  22. Besides purchase and establishment matter the information sought is pertaining to allegations of Corruption and as such not exempted u/s 24 of RTI Act 2005.

Registration Number –  MODEF/R/2014/60109