Category Archives: Drdo

Drdo

Landour cantonment case: Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar acts, notices soon

Leave a comment
landour-case-defence-ministry-acts-notices-soon
The defence ministry is taking stock of the situation at Landour cantonment, Mussoorie, after a complaint by a serving officer alleged wrongdoing.

By Manu Pubby, ET Bureau | Jul 29, 2016,
NEW DELHI: The defence ministry is taking stock of the situation at Landour cantonment, Mussoorie, after a complaint by a serving officer alleged wrongdoing related to several prime properties at the hill station that he said may prove to be “bigger than the Adarsh Housing scam“.

Even as the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC), which received a complaint by the estate officer of a DRDO lab located in Landour alleging a scam, moved on the matter, asking for comments from all concerned departments, sources told ET that senior defence ministry officials are tackling the issue.

As part of a fact finding mission, a senior official of the department of defence estates visited Landour after an ET story that revealed that cricketing legend Sachin Tendulkar met defence minister Manohar Parrikar regarding a property dispute over a holiday retreat.
Separately, a complaint by DRDO officer Y Ashok Babu had red flagged several commercial establishments (hotels) running in Landour allegedly without permissions, posing a security threat and eroding green cover, as reported by ET.

Sources said that the cantonment board is likely to send notices to several properties located at Landour, including some owned or being run by Tendulkar’s aide, businessman Sanjay Narang.

Also, a change of stance is unlikely on ‘Dahlia Bank’, a hill mansion owned by Narang which is at the center of a property dispute with the cantonment board and DRDO establishment Institute of Technology Management.
Tendulkar, who frequently stays at the mansion, met Parrikar with regard to this dispute.

Narang has denied allegations of wrongdoing, while Tendulkar said that he went for the meeting but denied any economic interests in Landour. In the complaint sent by Babu, a Scientist D posted at ITM in charge of works and estate, to the central bureau of investigation (CBI) and the CVC, allegations of “Illegal high investment commercial activities” have been levelled. These are against a dozen properties, including `Dahlia Bank’ that is owned by Tendulkar’s aide Sanjay Narang.

Drdo

Siphoning of Govt. funds by DRDO Scientists through the Variable Increments Scheme

19 Comments

To,                                                                                           26th July 2016
Shri Manohar Parrikar,
Defence Minister,
Room No -104 South Block,
New Delhi-110011

Subject:  Siphoning of Govt. funds by DRDO Scientists through the Variable Increments Scheme.

Sir,
Website received enclosed letter which give details the exploitation Variable Increments scheme by DRDO Scientists. It is true that more than 30% DRDO Scientists are engaged in sundry works and are enjoying Flexible Complementary scheme & Variable Increments scheme without doing any scientific bench work. In DRDO Hqr lot of Scientists sitting since last 10 to 15 years and getting promotion on outstanding APAR. As per sources MoD taken seriously this issue and ask DRDO to shift such scientists to different labs but these DRDO Hqrs scientists become more powerful than their top bosses, reason they very well know the weakness. As per one such DON scientist already declared that no one can sift these Hqrs scientists in mass level may one or two will be reshuffle here & there.

Regards

Prabhu Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008
Phone 0135-2787750, Mobile 9411114879
Email prabhudoon@gmail.com website-www.corruptionindrdo.com

Enclosed
Copy of letter from IRDE, DRDO, Dehradun received by website.page 1 page 2page 3 page 4envelop irde letter

Drdo

DRDO officials think they are entitled to waste taxpayers’ money

4 Comments

To,                                                                                       23th July 2016
Shri ManoharParrikar,
Defence Minister,
Room No -104 South Block,
New Delhi-110011 

Subject: DRDO officials think they are entitled to waste tax payers’ money

Sir,

DRDO officials think they are entitled to waste taxpayers’ money and if Parrikar Sahib asks then they easily convince him in the name of defence preparedness, as they are in well practices in last ongoing cases.

But they don’t know the strength of honest team of DRDO, all are watching devotedly the acts and deeds of each and every corrupt official of DRDO, may be it take few time but everyone know that GOD can do wonder any time, like Parrikar Sahib got the responsibility of Defence..

As you aware  Sir, DRDO official having completion of purchasing latest vehicle for their personal use as staff car but GOI banned to purchase luxury vehicle for staff car. Here, in the name of project use for instrument and measurement equipment they manage to procure all available luxury vehicles worth corers of rupees. If you ask the list with photographs all such vehicles are decorated with red beacons and brass plate of designation of user official and they regularly use for their family ride also. Website already submitted lot of evidences, national papers also took the issues but unfortunately DRDO top officials were success to convince you this all done only in the name of defence preparedness of country.

Let see following case is perfect example of fooling the all laid down guidelines of GOI and all it is happening with help financial watch dogs PCDA (R&D). How they are closing their eyes on each and every violations of DRDO?

HEMRL, DRDO, Pune based lab used same tactics and procured an Innova vehicle in the name of  “Mobile Instrument Carrier”.Toyota Innova purchased against this tender from a firm “Ms Spar Enterprises, Mumbai“.

The vehicle prepared to use as staff car for Director, fitted red beacon, but unfortunately the matter is reported by Media and an RTI request was submitted by me through PMO.

The vehicle was grounded and the BA number is not even applied by HEMRL for this Toyota Innova.

Last 8th February 2016 the vehicle was taken out without BA number from HEMRL by Shri KPS Murthy, Sc. H,Director, HEMRL and proceeds to VRDE, Ahmednagar accompanied by Cmdr S K Patel, Director, QRS. The vehicle driver was M.B. Ramgude VO ‘C and the vehicle met with accident with MSRDC bus near Krutrim Reshim Paidas Kendra around 11:45 AM, location come under Khadki Police Station, In-charge – Sh. Sushil S Kadam (Senior Police Inspector) Mobile No. 9667977777, Police station Contact No. 020-25818659 / 26208423.

The matter was reported to you on 15th February 2016, here started the DRDO official confidence to fool the country by any means. HEMRL floated a tender for repairing the above road accidental Toyota Innova vehicle again using same name “Mobile Instrument Carrier”, in fact the vehicle never used for said purpose, because there was no such requirement at all, if it was there then why they put Red beacon on it and, why hide after paper and website publish the facts and overall why they not applied for BA number till date.

The according to DRDO Transport policy following are the procedure to procure special dedicated vehicle. But unfortunately HEMRL not followed a single step of above transport policy or neither CDA objected on purchase and as well as repairing case.

Interestingly the “Mobile Instrument Carrier”   used only once and two great instrument of DRDO was inside the special carrier. One Shri KPS Murthy, Sc. H & Director, HEMRL and other one Cmdr S K Patel, Director, QRS the husband famous DRDO Agniputri, Ms Tessy Thomas, Director, ASL & RCI, Hyderabad. See the weight of these two instruments.

Unless immediate action taken on culprits, this will go the way of case of Rustom2 Innova misuse by Dr K Tamilmani and his cohorts. Tamilmani after getting pension, now, happily spending life in US, while DFA M Shankar is on deputation to ISRO, and other culprit P Srikumar is in hiding. All escaped and PGD of Rustom2 Sh APVS Prasad is struggling to rectify others misuse. Hence, in HEMRL case, an exemplary action is solicited from honorable RM

So as usual hope for some exemplary action from Parrikar sahib’s office, or DRDO official again success to convince Parrikar sahib this case was done for defence preparedness of country.

Regards

Prabhu Dandriyal,

21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008

Phone 0135-2787750, Mobile 9411114879

Email prabhudoon@gmail.com website-www.corruptionindrdo.com

 

Enclosed

  1. Copy of Latest tender for repairing of Toyota Innova alias “Mobile Instrument Carrier”
  2. Photo of Vehicle fitted with Red Beacon
  3. Accident details
  4. Copy Tender of purchase
  5. Transport policy points

HEMRL floated a limited tender for repairing of“Mobile Instrument Carrier” and not put in CPP, inquiry sent to

1. Elevyan Automation and system Pune –
2. Raja Industries Pune
3. Hi-Tech Service Pune
4. Hydroflex Engineering Company Pune
5. Devendra Automobiles Pune
6. V.M. Motor
7. K.M.Motor
8. DSK. Motor

Hemrl innova reparing tender page 1innova purchased by hemrl as mobile instrument carrieraccident detailHEMRL_Inviotender for mobile instrument carriertender for mobile instrument carrier specificationmobile instrument carrier instrument trolly

 

 

 

 

Drdo

DRDO forgot Ethics for dealing sexual harassment case, proves that DRDO really following Different rules for different officers

2 Comments

To,                                                                                       22th July 2016

Shri Manohar Parrikar,

Defence Minister,

Room No -104 South Block,

New Delhi-110011 

Subject:  DRDO forgot Ethics for dealing sexual harassment case, proves that DRDO really following Different rules for different officers

Sir,

      As you already witnessing that in DRDO day by day number of cases are increasing of harassment whether it matter of service / minority / SC/ST/ Sexual harassment.

But surprisingly the processing/ handling of these cases are entirely different in each and every case, not a single case is dealing with proper ethics. Every case is dealing on the basis of accused/charged officer’s relations with his director and other connection with other senior officials sitting in DRDO Hqrs.

In some cases of sexual harassment accused were transferred or temporally attached to some other locations immediately without looking even their seniority, like one scientist ‘G’  from DIPAS transferred to INMAS.

Same time other cases like Sh Vipin Jain, Administrative Officer, ITM, DRDO Mussoorie and Sh V K Arora, Technical Officer ‘D’ IRDE, DRDO, Dehradun both are enjoying their power and position.

In Case of Sh Vipin Jain, Administrative Officer the charge sheet already served. He asked more time to reply i.e. 25th July 2016. See some great facts of DRDO culture.

  • Director, ITM give him full executive powers and always try to spend more to more time with him and giving full moral support to accused, who already found guilty by ICC, and bases of that he was chargesheeted.
  • Additional Director, ITM sharing lunch with him in daily basis.
  • Sh Vipin Jain, Administrative Officer trying to influence witness with all means.
  • As per reliable sources he already got written statement from 4 witnesses in his favor, because he is in position to ruin the carrier of any witness with holding their all official/ personal/financial records.
  • Sh Vipin Jain, Administrative Officer trying to throughout victim from official accommodation.
  • The chairman of ICC who conduct the inquiry is in trauma to see the favor given to accused/charged officer, the height of ITM management they served a notice/explanation to her on demand of accused. (Copy enclosed for your ready reference)

See the Director, ITM reaction on such sensitive matter.

Date of incident 26th January 2016 day time by the evening Director knows the total incident but try to bury the case to help Sh Vipin Jain;

Although very next day victim reported verbally to Ms Gopa Chaudhari, Chairman, women cell but Director was not ready to take cognizance such serious matter.

On 2nd March 2016 the victim submit written complaint to Ms Gopa Chaudhari, Chairman, women cell, ITM, DRDO Mussoorie (Copy of Complaint enclosed for your ready reference because I know the Insensitive officials of DRDO cannot going to show you real picture of the incident like they always did for even project status also).

On same day Ms Gopa Chaudhari act very efficiently and submit her report to Director with her recommendations in capacity of Presiding Officer, ICC. But nothing has been done by Director, ITM. (Letter enclosed for your ready reference)

On 4th March 2016 news flashed on TOI and the matter blow in Delhi and next day then CC (HR) flown to ITM, Mussororie but as per DRDO legacy system they did nothing up to 8th March 2016.

After pressure from Delhi Director ITM give direction to ICC to investigate the matter vide letter no ITM/Dir/ENQ/2016/2 dated 8 March 2016, referred the ICC letter No ITM/ICC(W)/2015-16 dt 2/3/2016. See the seriousness of Director on such sensitive matter, it takes 6 days to release the order, he gave sufficient time to accused to settle the course but unfortunately Sh Vipin Jain not able to convince victim and his family.

The best part of Director’s order is the inquiry should be done as per DOPT F. No. 11013/2/2014-Estt (A-II1) Dated July 16th, 2015 but they forgot the following the rules or just giving privilege to accused to harass and manage the witness as he is holding all executive powers of ITM.

As per DOPT F. No. 11013/2/2014-Estt (A-II1) Dated July 16th , 2015

Suspension

  1. A Government servant may also be placed under suspension before or after issue of a Charge Sheet where his continuance in office will prejudice the investigation, for example if there is an apprehension that he may tamper with witnesses or documents. Suspension may also be resorted to where continuance of the Government servant in office will be against wider public interest such as there is a public scandal and it is necessary to place the Government servant under suspension to demonstrate the policy of the Government to deal strictly with officers involved in such scandals. It may be desirable to resort to suspension in case of misdemeanor involving acts of moral turpitude.

Special provisions to deal with threats or intimidation

  1. Disciplinary Authority may also dispense with inquiry under Rule I 9(ii), and action may be taken without the inquiry when the Disciplinary Authority concludes that it is not reasonably practicable to hold such an inquiry. The circumstances leading to such a conclusion may exist either before the inquiry is commenced or may develop in the course of the inquiry. Such situation would be deemed to have arisen:

(i) where the Government servant, through or together with his associates terrorizes, threatens or intimidates witnesses who are likely to give evidence against him with fear of reprisal in order to prevent them from doing so; or

(I) where the Government servant himself or with or through others threatens, intimidates and terrorizes the Disciplinary Authority, Members of the Committee, the Presenting Officer or members of their family.

Sir, as per above facts you can realize the pathetic situation of DRDO management and their HR policies. There is famous that DRDO management follows “Different rules for different officers”

I personally feel if any one go through the victim complaint and statement, which she narrated in front of ICC will shake heart of any sensitive person. So it is no need to say what action is required.

 

Regards

Prabhu Dandriyal,

21-Sunderwala, Raiput, Dehradun-248008

Phone 0135-2787750, Mobile 9411114879

Email prabhudoon@gmail.com website-www.corruptionindrdo.com

Enclosed

  1. Copy of written complaint by victim dated 2nd March 2016
  2. Copy of ICC report 2nd March 2016
  3. Copy of Director ITM letter
  4. Copy of Statement of victim

  

Drdo

Totally endorse the stand taken by Parrikar. A minister should listen to everyone but must act in accordance with constitution and for the larger good – Amita, Chennai

1 Comment

The aforementioned comment was posted by Amita from Chennai on the TOI article “business ally’s resort in Mussoorie: Officials” 19th July 2016

By seeing these views, the DRDO team gets charged to fight against corruption because they feel confident that a Defence Minister like Sh. Parrikar is there to stop all corrupt influences. Maybe some time is taken and some delays occur, but ultimately this corrupt gang of DRDO will soon get a big hit for their wrong doings.

Last few days Mr. Narang continue visiting ITM with a mobile and discussed the issue with ITM officials and showed his clarifications of property and asked whether ITM had complained officially or not. If they had not, then he asked for a letter mentioning some favors.

During the time of earlier Director, Mr. Narang visited ITM with a briefcase but returned without the briefcase and coincidentally the then Director and number two both were on long leave for few days and in between the construction was done in full swing.

Here is a copy of the letter sent to CVC regarding the property developed in the cantonment area adjacent to ITM, DRDO.

 

To                                                                               Date: 06.07.2016

The Chief Vigilance Commissioner,

Satarkata Bhawan,

New Delhi

Sub: Mushrooming illegal Hotels and Guest houses in Landour Cantt. Mussoorie

Honourable Chief Vigilance Commissioner,

I am writing this letter to complain about illegal high investment commercial activities going on in Landour Cantonment probably in collusion with officials, and members of cantonment board.

If Mussoorie is called “Queen of Hills” then Lanodur Cantt. Area can be called as “Crown of the Queen”. You may be aware that the green cover of these beautiful hills is being destroyed by indiscriminate urbanization, and commercial activity turning them into concrete jungles. Unfortunately, where Cantonment areas are supposed to be an example of clean and green with strict following of law and order, and integrity but we got an example of such cantonment in Landour which seems to be working other way and helping cronies occupy prime locations and indulging in indiscriminate, illegal commercial activities. The institute of Technology Management, DRDO is located in the Landour Cantt. And is the major stakeholder of the cantonment area. As Scientist of DRDO, and Officer In charge of Works (Estate) of Institute of Technology Management, I tried to do my best in my official capacity to highlight these activities in the vicinity of institute with Cantonment board authorities including GOC of Uttarakhand Subarea  on grounds of destruction of green cover of the hill, encroachment of  ITM roads, and high density moment of foreign tourist visiting these illegal hotels and guest houses posing severe inconvenience  and security threat to DRDO lab but I found things are much murkier than what I imagined. There is a sense of systematic and deep rooted corruption in Cantonment to allow multi billion investments by big players in hospitality industry with covert protection for flourishing their business.

Since I felt I have severe limitation to tackle at an official capacity, I should write to you at personal level to deal with the situation with suitable action. There are many high end hotels and guest houses running here illegally such as Rokeby Manor, Bothwell Bank, Tabour Cottage, Pine Tree Lodge, Lanodur Bakery (All owned by Mars Hospitality Group of Mr. Sanajay Narang), La Villa Batheny, Ivy Bank, Domas Inn, Devdar Woods,  Prospect Point. When ITM wrote to CEO cantonment about how you give these guest houses permission without any parking space due to which ITM roads are being blocked! In reply he said, we gave no permission to any such guesthouses to run. This shocking reply itself shows how such high end guest houses can run without covert support of Cantonment officials and members. Majority of these guesthouses are owned by Mr. Sanajay Narang, surprisingly all these within a span of 4-5 years. Mr. Sanajay Narang also constructed a big mansion (Dahlia Bank) behind ITM violating Works of Defence ACT. ITM in a court case with him with this regard (He filed a writ petition after losing the same case in Supreme court of India) in this case too Cantt. took good sweet time to comply with orders of SC so that he gets good time to file a writ petition. These high end hotels are made with investment worth 100s of crores (Especially hotels of Mr Narang) and cater to foreign tourists, high end guests including ministers, VIPS and judges. Its impossible to run 12 hotels without permission in a cantonment area, if integrity and sanctity of the Cantonment is intact. If Cantt. Not given any such permission than they are not even charging these properties to the tune of amount chargeable from commercial properties! Moreover, Cantonment board them self indulging in such activities, such as Building of Ivy Cafe, where they have initially taken sanction for double story car parking but the lower level space was constructed in such a way so that it becomes impossible for parking cars. This basement was later rented out for a cafe. In the same way, for another property the board has taken initial sanction for Cantt. Accommodation and guest house, but leased out to a private party to run guesthouse for civil tourist. The guy who has taken lease of this property had expanded to a big cafe but lack no space for a vehicle parking. This property made serious congestion of key road leading to ITM. It sounds fishy about how sanction for constructing something else has been changed to constructing a building for entirely for different purpose.

These all activities in the Landour Cantt ruining sanctity and credibility of a cantonment and promoting rampant corruption and destroying green belt of the Crown of the Queen of the Hills (Mussoorie). I humbly request you to kindly order an enquiry on how these illegal hotels are running, who are behind it, involvement of Cantonment officials and presidents since last 6-7 years and save this serene hill from thugs and thieves. There is a serious fraud and corruption happening here, I wonder it may prove bigger than “Adarsh Housing Scam”.

Thank you

 

                                                                                                                           Landour Cantt. Mussoorie

 

Enclosures:

 

Letters related to communication with Landour Cantt.

Screenshots of web pages of these guesthouses

Other related documents

Copy to

Director General, Central Bureau of Investigation, New Delhi

Director General of Defence Estates, New Delhi (Without enclosures)

 

Drdo

business ally’s resort in Mussoorie: Officials

Leave a comment

ET Bureau | Jul 19, 2016
sachin toiDELHI: Cricketing icon Sachin Tendulkar had sought Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar’s help to rescue a plush holiday retreat he frequents in Landour, Mussoorie, from a security dispute with the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO).
Such was the urgency of the matter that Tendulkar, a Rajya Sabha member, even cut short a trip to Australia last year just to meet Parrikar with this request, senior defence ministry officials familiar with the matter told ET.
The property in question is his famed summer den Dahlia Bank in the Landour cantonment area that has allegedly breached the 50-foot, no-construction zone next to the Institute of Technology Management, a sensitive DRDO establishment.
The home is partly owned by Tendulkar’s business partner Sanjay Narang. Parrikar is believed to have given a “patient hearing” to the Indian batting legend but desisted from making any intervention in the issue.
South Block officials told ET that the defence minister was unwilling to do so in a matter involving alleged illegal construction next to a sensitive DRDO laboratory complex.
Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar didn’t intervene
“Tendulkar had been trying to meet the minister and an appointment was set up. He spoke at length about the property case, which was heard out. However, no action was taken on the request put forward,” a senior official told ET.
Tendulkar didn’t respond to ET’s questions on the matter. The defence ministry declined to issue a formal comment on the issue.
The institute’s version is that Narang had obtained permissions to build tennis courts in what is called the ‘restricted construction zone’ around the establishment but instead went on to construct full-fledged buildings.
Narang did not respond to questions sent by ET but his representative, who did not want to be named, claimed that the area in dispute fell outside the zone. She further alleged that the DRDO institute had taken a “faulty stand” and had made “wrong interpretations”.
The hotelier owns several properties in and around the Landour cantonment area that has emerged as a highend tourist destination near Mussoorie.
However, these building activities have attracted controversy with a complaint on “illegal high-investment commercial activities” reaching the Central Vigilance Commission and Central Bureau of Investigation last month

Drdo

Sachin Tendulkar sought favours from defence minister Manohar Parrikar: Report

Leave a comment

July 19, 2016, International Business Times
By S V Krishnamachari

Sachin Tendulkar sought favours from defence minister Manohar Parrikar: Report Sachin Tendulkar, cricket player and Rajya Sabha member, reportedly sought favours from defence minister over a holiday retreat that was in a dispute with DRDO. In Picture: Tendulkar (C) speaks to the media after taking oath at the Indian parliament in New Delhi June 4, 2012 (Representational image).Reuters file
Sachin Tendulkar sought favours from defence minister Manohar Parrikar: Report
Sachin Tendulkar, cricket player and Rajya Sabha member, reportedly sought favours from defence minister over a holiday retreat that was in a dispute with DRDO. In Picture: Tendulkar (C) speaks to the media after taking oath at the Indian parliament in New Delhi June 4, 2012 (Representational image).Reuters file

Cricket star and MP Sachin Tendulkar apparently lobbied with Defence minister Manohar Parrikar last year to settle a dispute between his friend’s retreat in Mussoorie and a defence institute over an ‘illegal’ construction.

Parrikar however declined to intervene in the matter, reports The Economic Times.
The urgency of the matter could be gauged from the fact that Tendulkar had to advance his return to India from Australia to take up the matter with the minister, the daily said, citing defence ministry officials.

The holiday retreat — Dahlia Bank in the Landour cantonment area — had allegedly violated the 50-foot, no-construction zone next to the Institute of Technology Management, a sensitive DRDO establishment, the daily said.

Tendulkar had been trying to meet the minister and an appointment was set up. He spoke at length about the property case, which was heard out. However, no action was taken on the request put forward,” ET quoted a senior defence ministry official as saying.
The dispute arose over Tendulkar’s business partner Sanjay Narang constructing buildings, despite having sought and obtained approval to construct a tennis court in the restricted, high-security zone.
The Dahlia Bank controversy was in the news even in 2014, when Ajit B Reddy, CEO of Landour Cantonment, referred to the construction activities at the retreat as “unauthorised,” according to a Hindustan Times report in December 2014.

Tendulkar’s friend Sanjay Narang approached the Supreme Court to appeal against an Uttaranchal High Court order that ruled against him.

In February 2015, the Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s decision. An SC bench comprising Justice Pinaki Chandra Gosh and Ranjan Gogi, termed the construction work as “illegal,” The Tribune had reported on Feb. 25, 2015, referring to the February 17 judgment.
The Institute of Technology Management was set up in 1962 to train defence personnel.

Tendulkar has multiple sports and business interests. He is a mentor of the IPL team, Mumbai Indians, co-promoter of Smaaash Entertainment, and co-owner of ISL team Kerala Blasters.

Drdo

Sachin Tendulkar sought Defence Minister’s help to rescue business ally’s resort in Mussoorie: Officials

Leave a comment

By Manu Pubby, ET Bureau | Jul 19, 2016

NEW DELHI: Cricketing icon Sachin Tendulkar had sought Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar’s help to rescue a plush holiday retreat he frequents in Landour, Mussoorie, from a security dispute with the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO).

Such was the urgency of the matter that Tendulkar, a Rajya Sabha member, even cut short a trip to Australia last year just to meet Parrikar with this request, senior defence ministry officials familiar with the matter told ET.

The property in question is his famed summer den Dahlia Bank in the Landour cantonment area that has allegedly breached the 50-foot, no-construction zone next to the Institute of Technology Management, a sensitive DRDO establishment.

The home is partly owned by Tendulkar’s business partner Sanjay Narang. Parrikar is believed to have given a “patient hearing” to the Indian batting legend but desisted from making any intervention in the issue.

dahlia bank ET 19 july 2016South Block officials told ET that the defence minister was unwilling to do so in a matter involving alleged illegal construction next to a sensitive DRDO laboratory complex..

The nstituite’s version is that Narang had obtained permissions to build tennis courts in what is called the ‘restricted construction zone’ around the establishment but instead went on to construct full-fledged buildings.

Narang did not respond to questions sent by ET but his representative, who did not want to be named, claimed that the area in dispute fell outside the zone. She further alleged that the DRDO institute had taken a “faulty stand” and had made “wrong interpretations”.

The hotelier owns several properties in and around the Landour cantonment area that has emerged as a high end tourist destination near Mussoorie.

However, these building activities have attracted controversy with a complaint on “illegal high-investment commercial activities” reaching the Central Vigilance Commission and Central Bureau of Investigation last month.

Drdo

The Ashok Hotel Bill for DRDO Party

3 Comments

To,                                                                                       18th July 2016

Shri Manohar Parrikar,

Defence Minister,

Room No -104 South Block,

New Delhi-110011 

 

Subject:  The Ashok Hotel Bill for DRDO Party

Sir,

Website received a letter with input of above subject please see and do needful investigation for corrective measures in DRDO working.

Regards

 

Prabhu Dandriyal,

21-Sunderwala, Raiput, Dehradun-248008

Phone 0135-2787750, Mobile 9411114879

Email prabhudoon@gmail.com website-www.corruptionindrdo.com

Enclosed

  1. Copy of received letter
  2. Copy of envelop of letter

 

To                                                                                            18 July 2016

Sh Ashok Sharma,

DGM F&A, (B&C- IA),

CPIO for Bills & Credit Division,

India Tourism Development Corp. Ltd..

Scope Complex, Core-8, 6th Floor,

7-Lodhi Road,

New Delhi-110 003.

Hello,

Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005 in respect of The Ashok Banquet Bill No. 656 dated 31 March 2012. Name of the Party Director, DIITM, DRDO, MoD, Govt of India, room No 445, B Block, DRDO Bhawan, New Delhi, C/O Col Rajendra Prasad. (Photocopy enclosed).

  1. Provide the certified copy of above mentioned bill.
  2. Provide the order copy of Director, DIITM, DRDO against above bill.
  3. Provide the deposition evidence of Service Tax & VAT in respect of above Bill
  4. Hand written bill are in practice in hotel The Ashok Yes or No
  5. Provide the copies of bills of parties arranged for DRDO by The Ashok for financial year April 2012 –March 2013, April 2013 – March 2014 & April 2014 – March 2015

 

Note – Above bills were paid from public funds and not come under any personal informations

 

Regards

 

Prabhu Dandriyal

21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun 248008

Phone   0135 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,

e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website   www.corruptionindrdo.com

Enclosed – Photo copy of Bill Bill No. 656 dated 31 March 2012, issued to Director, DIITM, DRDO,

Registration Number         ITDCO/R/2016/50028

  1. the ashok bill 1the ashok bill0002the ashok envelop

 

 

 

Drdo

देश भ्रष्टाचार मुक्त डीआरडीओ के लिए प्रतीक्षारत

3 Comments

सेवा में                                                                              16 जुलाई 2016

माननीय श्री मनोहर पर्रिकर

रक्षा मंत्री , भारत सरकार

कक्ष – 104, साउथ ब्लॉक

नई दिल्ली – 110011

विषय: देश भ्रष्टाचार मुक्त डीआरडीओ के लिए प्रतीक्षारत

            जब मोदी जी ने सत्ता संभाली तो देश ने सोचा अब बदलाव की बयार आएगी और इंतजार शुरू हो गया।  रक्षा मंत्री की कमान एक एक्सपर्ट वकील को सौंप दी और देश बदलाव का इंतजार करते रह गया।  अचानक मोदी जी एक निहायत ही ईमानदार छवि वाले तथा   तकनीकी सक्षम  व्यक्तित्व को देश  की रक्षा मंत्रालय की कमान सौंप दी।  अब देश की अपेक्षाएं काफी बढ़ गयी और पर्रिकर साहेब ने उनके अनुरुप बहुत  से महत्तवपूर्ण निर्णय लिए और बदलाव को दिशा दी।

उसी अपेक्षाएं से देश ने रक्षा मंत्रालय के रक्षा अनुसंधान संस्थान में व्याप्त करप्शन व् अक्षमता को दुरस्त  करने की उम्मीद पर्रिकर साहेब से की,  और पर्रिकर साहेब ने बहुत से महत्तवपूर्ण निर्णय लिए

  • जैसे 60 वर्ष के बाद वैज्ञानिकों का सेवा विस्तार बंद करना,
  • अविनाश चन्द्र का कॉन्ट्रैक्ट नियुक्ति रद्द करना,
  • डी जी व् रक्षा सलाहकार के पद का विकेंदीकृत कर दो पदों में करना आदि।

परन्तु रक्षा अनुसंधान संस्थान में व्याप्त करप्शन व् अक्षमता को काबू करने में  पर्रिकर साहेब को काफी दिक्कतों का सामना करना पड़ रहा  ।

डीआरडीओ के दिगज्ज ब्लफ मास्टरों के सामने पर्रिकर साहेब का तकनीकी ज्ञान सब धरा का धरा रह गया है।  जिस भी  करप्शन व् अक्षमता पर पर्रिकर साहेब आदेश देते हैं उन सब आदेशों को डीआरडीओ के ये दिगज्ज ताक पर रख देते हैं और पर्रिकर साहेब को एक नई कहानी में उलझा देते है।

पर्रिकर साहेब को को कई वैज्ञानिकों ने मिल कर व् पत्र के माध्यम से  डीआरडीओ में व्याप्त करप्शन व् अक्षमता की जानकारी समय समय पर दी और पर्रिकर साहेब ने उन्हें तुरंत संज्ञान में भी लिया और उसको ठीक करने के लिए उचित आदेश भी दिए परन्तु डीआरडीओ के दिगज्ज ब्लफ मास्टरों ने उन सब आदेशों में पानी फेर दिया और उनका सबसे बड़ा हथियार  है यह कि हमें ये सब देश की सुरक्षा के हित में करना पड़ता है और इन सब कार्यो में कोई निजी लाभ या कोई विद्वेष भावना नहीं है और पर्रिकर साहेब उनका विश्वास कर सबूतों को दरकिनार कर रहे है पर कब तक ?

देश की सुरक्षा के हित में चाहे  डीआरडीओ के बजट का 27% का  एसपीआईसी (SPIC)  द्वारा मनमाने ढंग से ठिकाने लगाने का कार्य हो

या CIAR बैंगलोर द्वारा करोडो रुपये का सॉफ्टवेयर की खरीद हो  जिसकी फिलहाल सर्विसेस को अगले 10  सालो में भी जरुरत न हो।

और इन सबकी  तात्कालिकता   (urgency)  ऐसी दिखाई जाती है की टीपीसी भी होटल में करी जाती है और सभी उच्च अधिकारी द्रुत गति से युद्ध स्तर पर फाइल का निस्तारण करते है।

और दूसरी बात जो ये डीआरडीओ के दिगज्ज ब्लफ मास्टर पर्रिकर साहेब को समझाते है कि शिकायतकर्ता ये शिकायत व्यक्तिगत प्रतिशोध के लिए की है।  यंहा पर हमारे पर्रिकर साहेब गच्चा खा जाते है और इनकी बातो में आ कर शिकायत की मेरिट को भूल जाते है शिकायत साथ लगे सबूत व् तथ्य नजरअंदाज कर दिए जाते है और देश करप्शन व् अक्षमता की लड़ाई में एक कदम पीछे हो जाता है।

इसमें समझने वाली बात ये है की जो सबूत एक अनपढ़ भी समझ सकता है  उनको  कैसे ये डीआरडीओ के दिगज्ज ब्लफ मास्टर  पर्रिकर साहेब के सामने झूठा साबित करते है और पर्रिकर साहेब किन कारणों से कुछ नहीं कर पाते, यह निहायत ही समझ से परे है।

उदाहरण के लिए डीएमएसआरडीइ, कानपुर के करप्शन केस जिसमे में पर्याप्त से अधिक सबूत होते हुए भी डॉ अरविन्द सक्सेना पूर्व निदेशक को रक्षा मंत्रालय के विजिलेंस विभाग ने आखरी तारीख को 31 जुलाई 2015 क्लीन चिट दी।

जबकि  पर्रिकर साहेब ने डॉ अरविन्द सक्सेना के खिलाफ कार्यवाही के आदेश बहुत पहले ही दे दिए थे । परन्तु उन आदेशों का पालन पर तत्कालीन डीओपी,  डीआरडीओ डॉ ऐ के सिंह द्वारा ऐसे घुमाया गया ताकि  31 जुलाई 2015  (डॉ अरविन्द सक्सेना सेवा निवृत्ति दिवस ) तक पर्रिकर साहेब के आदेशों को बर्फ में दबाया जा सके।

यह एक बहुत ही विचित्र उदहारण है कि जिस निदेशक को रक्षा मंत्रालय के विजिलेंस विभाग ने क्लीन चिट दी उसके मातहत 39  वैज्ञानिकों व् अधिकारियो को उन कार्यो के लिए शो कॉज नोटिस दिया जाता है  कि जिन कार्यो को उन्होंने उस निदेशक के निर्देश के अनुसार उसी निदेशक की मातहती किया था।  अब इन  वैज्ञानिकों पेंशन रोकी जा रही है, प्रमोशन रोके  जा रहे रहे और प्रशासनिक कार्यवाही की तैयारी की जा रही है।

अगर   डॉ अरविन्द सक्सेना के खिलाफ पर्याप्त  सबूत  नहीं थे तो इन 39 वैज्ञानिकों व् अधिकारियो के खिलाफ कार्यवाही क्यों हो रही है ,

सिर्फ इसलिए की इन वैज्ञानिकों व् अधिकारियो के पास डॉ ऐ के सिंह जैसा करप्ट मित्र नहीं है जिसने की  डॉ अरविन्द सक्सेना के पक्ष में अपने पद का दुर्प्रयोग  करते हुए फर्जी एफिडेविट तक  कोर्ट में सबमिट करे।  ये सब डीआरडीओ के वैज्ञानिकों व् अधिकारियो द्वारा सविधान का मजाक उड़ने जैसा है।

डॉ जी एस मलिक सी सी आर एन्ड डी, जब डायरेक्टर डीटीआरएल थे तो उन्होंने अपने मातहत वैज्ञानिक श्री पटनायक की एलटीसी में धोखाधडी करने की सबूत के साथ शिकायत करी थी, परन्तु जब की वो अब डीआरडीओ के विजिलेंस के हेड का भी कार्य संभाल रहे है पर वैज्ञानिक श्री पटनायक व् उनके साथियो पर कोई कार्यवाही तो नहीं की,  बल्कि  उल्टा उन्हें प्रमोशन आदि दिलाने में भरपूर सहयोग भी दिया । इस कृपादृष्टि का  कारण तो सिर्फ डॉ जी एस मलिक को ही पता होगा कि उनका इसमें कितने  निहित स्वार्थ सिद्ध हुए।

दूसरी ओर डीआरडीओ में एस सी / एस टी, अल्पसंख्यकों  व महिलाओं के शोषण के मामले दिनों दिन बढ़ते जा रहे है।

सिर्फ  एस सी  कमीशन, अल्पसंख्यक  कमीशन, व्  डीआरडीओ से पिछले 2  सालो के कंप्लेंट संख्या मांग कर देखे।  पर्रिकर साहेब यदि आपने कोई सख्त निर्णय नहीं लिया तो डीआरडीओ अतिशीघ्र भविष्य के गर्त में समा जायेगा।

  • डीपास लैब तिमारपुर दिल्ली में दो महिलाओं के शोषण के मामले एक अल्पसंख्यक को प्रताड़ित करने के मामले पिछले दो वर्षो से लंबित चल रह है।
  • एएसएल हैदराबाद के पी एच डी महिला का शोषण का मामला आपको विदित ही है।
  • मसूरी स्थित आई टी एम में श्री विपिन जैन प्रशासनिक अधिकारी द्वारा संविदा कर्मी महिला के शोषण मामला वो भी ऐसे संस्थान में जंहा डीआरडीओ के वैज्ञानिकों व् अधिकारियो को व्यवहार, मानव संसाधन, परियोजना प्रबंधन आदि का प्रशिक्षण देने का कार्य किया जाता है।
  • देहरादून स्थित आईआरडीई संस्थान में  मुख्य प्रशासनिक अधिकारी का काम सँभालने वाले तकीनीकी अधिकारी श्री वी के अरोड़ा के विररुद्ध भी  एक महिला वैज्ञानिक ने कार्यालय क्षेत्र में दुर्व्यहार का आरोप लगाया है और विडंबना यह है कि डीआरडीओ के अक्षम अधिकारियो के कारण महिला वैज्ञानिक को एससी  कमीशन में जाना पड़ा।

तीसरा डीआरडीओ का रसातल में जाने का कारण है मैन पवार सलेक्शन में गुणवत्ता की अनदेखी।  डीआरडीओ में नियुक्तियों में बड़ा गोरख धन्दा चल रहा है।  बिना योग्यता के सिर्फ  पैसे के बल पर नियुक्तियों पर जोर है।  और इसके लिए कोई सबूत की जरूरत नहीं है मात्र पिछले तीन साल की नियुक्तियों का पुनः परीक्षण करा लिया जाये तो सारी  स्पष्ट जाएगी। नियुक्तियों में फ़र्ज़ी शैक्षिक दस्तावेजों का होना एक आम बात है इस सिलसिले में डीआरडीओ में लगभग 67 कम्प्लेंट्स लंबित है तथा 27 केस कोर्ट में चल रहे है।  ऐसे लोगो की नियुक्ति हो रखी हैं जिन्हें विषय से सम्बंधित ज्ञान नहीं है।  एक ही जगह के  पांच से दस लोगो की नियुक्ति होना कोई अविश्वसनीय संयोग नहीं है।  ऐसे बहुत सी वजह हैं जिनसे इन डीआरडीओ के दिग्गज वैज्ञानिकों की योग्यता का पता चलता है।

चौथा बड़ा कारण है कि विज्ञानं के अलावा इन डीआरडीओ के इन बड़े वैज्ञानिकों में  आपको अन्य कार्यो में इनकी महारत हर जगह दिखाई देती और एक स्पेशल जगह है कंस्ट्रक्शन आप इनसे पिछले दो सालो में कंस्ट्रक्शन कार्यो का विवरण मांग ले तो आपको आश्चर्य होगा कि  डीआरडीओ के इन बड़े वैज्ञानिकों ने अपने कितने मैन ऑवर इन कंस्ट्रक्शन कार्यो में लगाए हैं जितनी शिद्दत से डीआरडीओ  में कंस्ट्रक्शन कार्यो मेहनत की जाती हैं वैसी मेहनत और लगन प्रोजेक्ट के कार्यो में नहीं दिखती। ऐसा नहीं है की इसकी जानकारी आपको नहीं है क्योंकि कुछ समय पूर्व आपने डीआरडीओ को अन्य विभागों के कंस्ट्रक्शन कार्यो को करने से   मना किया था और सही भी था डीआरडीओ का मुख्य उद्देश्य रक्षा क्षेत्र में अंसुधान है न कि कंस्ट्रक्शन, परन्तु आप इन्हे  कंस्ट्रक्शन प्रेम से दूर नहीं रख सकते।

इन सब तथ्यों  देखते हुए लगता है की देश को किसी हृदय परिवर्तन का इंतजार करना पड़ेगा जब पर्रिकर साहेब सही मायनों में इन डीआरडीओ के दिगज्ज ब्लफ मास्टरों के असलियत को समझ पाएंगे क्योंकि पिछले लगभग 30 सालों से तो कोई रक्षा मंत्री इनसे पार् नहीं कर पाये।  और यही कारण है कि 56 वर्षो में हम रक्षा क्षेत्र अंसुधान में इतनी प्रतिभाओं के होते पिछड़ से गए।

ये बड़े गर्वे की बात है आज देश का रक्षा मंत्री एक आई आई टी से निकला हुआ योग्य व्यक्ति है जिससे देश को अपेक्षा है कि रक्षा क्षेत्र में तकनीकी विकास कार्यो में दिनों दिन बढ़ोतरी हो और देश आत्मनिर्भरता की ओर बड़े कदम बढ़ाए।

माननीय पर्रिकर साहेब कुछ डीआरडीओ के सम्बन्ध में समय निकाल कर उचित निर्णय लीजिए ताकि ये डीआरडीओ के दिगज्ज ब्लफ मास्टरों को अपनी मनमानी करने में रोक लगे।

  • रही सबूतों की बात जब चाहे मंगा लीजिए हमेशा देश हित में हाजिर है।

धन्यवाद

 

प्रभु डंडरियाल

21- सुंदरवाला, रायपुर

देहरादून – 248008

9411114879, 0135-2787750

prabhudoon@gmail.com, www,corruptionindrdo.com