Tag Archives: CC (R&D)

Drdo

RTI reply from DOPT regarding the extension of Dr Shubhananda Rao, CC R&D, (Areo).

6 Comments

  November 1, 2011

Dear friends of DRDO,

Today I have received a RTI reply from DOPT regarding the extension of Dr Shubhananda Rao, CC R&D, (Areo).

The reply is very interesting please see the Dr Arun Kumar’s expertise of manipulation, but in hurry how output generated, it is great example.

Please send your comments and analysis on this RTI Reply.

Thanking you

Regards
       
Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008
Phone – 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
E-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com,  prabhu@dandriyal.com

Website –  www.corruptionindrdo.com

Enclosed

  1. My RTI request to DOPT
  2. DOPT reply

                                                                                                 Date 10th June 2011

The CPIO
Under Secretary (Estt.A-IV)
R.No.202, North Block, D/o. Personnel & Training, North Block
New Delhi

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005.

Dr. A. Subhananda Rao, CC (R& D), Director HEMRL, Sutarwadi, Pune- 411021 granted extension/re-employment as per rule laid down wide OM DoPT O.M.No. 26011/1/77-Estt.(B)  dated the 18th May, 1977 for Central Government servants  beyond the age of superannuation.

Extension: F.R. 56(d) states that no Government servant shall be granted extension of service beyond the age of 60 years.  However, provisions exist in the rules to grant extension of service to certain category of Government servants only.  Therefore, it must be ensured that no Ministry/Department should propose to grant extension in service unless the case is covered by the Rules

  1. Please Provide me the copy of  proposal of extension in respect of Dr. A. Subhananda Rao, CC (R& D), Director HEMRL with copy of certificate of Integrity along with the DoPT prescribed Annexure-I (Enclosed)
  2. In the recommendation for extension of his service beyond 60 years whether any confirmation/ information regarding pendency of any criminal/ civil case against  Dr. A. Subhananda Rao, CC (R& D), Director HEMRL is mentioned or Not.

Find the application fee for the request attached with this application. If you feel that above requested information does not pertain to your department then please follow the provisions of Section 6(3) of the RTI Act, 2005/Also as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 please provide the details (Name and Designation) of the first appellate authority w.r.t to your department with the reply to the above request., where I may if required file my first appeal.
I do hereby declare that I am a citizen of India. Kindly provide me with the information at the address mentioned with the application. I request you to ensure that the information is provided before the expiry of the 30 day period after

Enclosed- Rs 10 Postal order 88E628354

Regards,
Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal    
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008
Phone – 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,  
e-mail id prabhu@dandriyal.com ,

www.corruptionindrdo.com

No. 26012/6/2002-Estt. (A)
 
Government of India
 
Ministry of Personnel, P.G. & Pensions
 
(Department of Personnel & Training )
 

New Delhi, dated 9th December, 2002

OFFICE MEMORANDUM

Subject : Grant of extension/re-employment to Central Government  servants  beyond the age of superannuation – issue of  instructions regarding.

The undersigned is directed to say that the criteria for grant of extension/re employment to Central Government employees beyond the age of superannuation are laid down in the DoPT O.M.No. 26011/1/77-Estt.(B)  dated the 18th May, 1977.  After May, 1998 and when the age of retirement  of the Central Government employees increased from 58 to 60 years, some  of the instructions contained in the O.M. dated 18th May, 1977 referred to above have lost their relevance.  Accordingly, it has been decided to revise the instructions relating to extension/re-employment to Central Government employees.

2. In the absence of specific orders to the contrary by the competent authority, a Government servant must retire on the due date.  The date of superannuation of a Government servant is known in advance and ordinarily there should not be a question of failure to make arrangements for his release sufficiently in advance.  It is the responsibility of the administrative authority concerned to ensure that the Government servants under their control retire on the due date.

3.  Extension: F.R. 56(d) states that no Government servant shall be granted extension of service beyond the age of 60 years.  However,  provisions exist in the rules to grant extension of  service to certain  category of Government servants only.  Therefore, it must be ensured that no  Ministry/Department  should propose to grant extension in service unless the case is covered by the Rules.

4. The proposal for grant of extension in service to the categories of  personnel referred to in the first, second and third proviso to F.R. 56(d)    -2- shall be referred to the Estt. Division of Department of Personnel and Training two months prior to the date on which the individual concerned is  due for superannuation.   The procedure for grant of extension to the Scientists is laid down in DoPT d.o. letter No. 28/19/2000-EO(SM-II) dated the 10th July, 2000.

5. Procedure for consideration of cases for extension of specialists in the medical and scientific fields:- It should be appreciated that even in the case of extension to specialist in the medical or scientific fields, it is not only the next man who misses promotion but often several people miss consequential promotions all along  the hierarchy.  Thus, too many cases of extension in service or reemployment are likely to cause frustration and affect the morale of the upcoming scientists who have exposure to latest technological developments in connecting fields.  Keeping in view these circumstances, the following criteria and procedure has been evolved with a view to ensure that extensions in service to the superannuating scientists are resorted to only in really exceptional circumstances.  The overriding consideration for the grant of extension is that it must be in the public interest and in addition satisfy one of the following two conditions:-

i)    that the retiring specialist is  not just one of the outstanding officers but is really head and shoulders above the rest; or

ii)   that other specialists are not ripe enough to take over the  job.

Test (ii) would be satisfied only if there is shortage in particular specialization, or if it is not possible to find a suitable successor or if the specialist is engaged on a work or project of vital importance, which is likely to produce results in a year or two.  If specialists in the next lower post are not eligible for promotion on the ground that they have not put in the minimum service in the lower grade prescribed under the rules, no promotions can be made to the higher grade, unless such specialists put in the requisite length of service.  But specialists who are eligible for promotion  to the post against which extension is recommended, should not be rejected solely on the ground that they do not have as much experience as the retiring specialist.  They should be considered for promotion according to the -3- recruitment rules and if they are found suitable they should be promoted to the posts being vacated by the retiring specialists.

6. Whenever any specialist is considered for grant of extension, his character roll and personal file should be carefully scrutinized and all other relevant information that may be available should be taken into account to judge whether the specialist had good reputation for integrity and honesty.   In cases where the specialist is not considered to have good reputation for integrity and honesty, he should not be considered for grant of extension in service.  The appropriate authority in the Administrative Ministry should furnish a certificate of Integrity along with the Annexure-I as follows where it proposes to grant extension of service.

“Having scrutinized in character roll and personal file of

Shri/Smt./Kum._____________________ and having taken into account all other relevant available information, I certify that he/she has a good reputation for integrity and honesty.”

7. While making proposals for extension of service in higher posts, it is all the more necessary to apply higher standards of efficiency to persons whose appointments to the higher posts are recommended for approval of the Appointments Committee of the Cabinet.  The number of top posts is bound to be very limited and a few persons should not have them for too long.  No Government servant who is on extension of service after the prescribed date of retirement should be promoted to another post during the period of extension of service.

8. No extension of service should be considered on the ground that a suitable successor is not available unless it is established that action to select a successor had been taken well in advance but the selection could not be finalized in time for justifiable reasons.  A proposal for the grant of extension of service based merely on the consideration that the specialist’s predecessor had been given extension should obviously not be accepted. -4-

9.  Re-employment: No proposal for employing a government servant beyond the age of superannuation of 60 years shall be considered.  It is also clarified that no person can be appointed/ reappointed to Central Government service after the age of superannuation of 60 years through contract.

10. Re-employment of military pensioners who have not reached the age of superannuation for Central Government employees will not be governed by these instructions.

11. Appointment of Consultant:-

Detailed instructions have been issued for appointment of consultant vide DoP&T’s Office Memorandum No. 16012/7/97-Estt.(Allowance) dated 13th  February, 1998. Hindi version will follow.

                Sd/-

 

Mrs. Pratibha Mohan

 

Director (E-II)

 

To

 All Ministries/Departments of the Government of India.

(As per standard list)

Annexure-I

 

Performa for sending proposals  for approval of Department of Personnel & Training for grant  of extension to Government servants beyond the age of superannuation.

1. Designation of the post

2. Duration of the post     :

3. Scale and terms of the post and perquisite attached, if any:

4. Whether financial sanction for the creation of the post/continuance of post for the    duration shown at (2) has been obtained:

5. Method of recruitment:

6. Name and the terminal date of appointment of the outgoing incumbent of the post:

7. Name of the specialist proposed for appointment and the service to which he belongs:

 

8. Full service particulars of the Officer with date of birth and pay drawn:

9. Names of other Officers considered:

10.If promotion post, whether copies of proceedings of a D.P.C. are being enclosed? If not, why not?

11. Whether character roll of the specialist proposed and those considered are being sent.  If not, why not?

12. Please indicate:

(i) (a) Whether the post  is scientific or medical specialist.

(b) Periods of extension granted earlier to the officer, if any

(c) Date from which extension is to be granted.

(d) Period of extension of service.

(ii) Justification for grant of extension:

(a)  The date from which it was known that vacancy would occur.

(b) Action taken to select a successor with chronological details.

(c) If selection is being made, reasons why this could not be finalized in good time.

(d) Can some officiating or ad-hoc arrangements be made, pending fresh appointment by proper selection? If not, why not?

(iii) Whether orders of the Minister-in charge have been obtained? 

13. Whether the prescribed Integrity Certificate, from the appropriate authority, is enclosed.

DOPT covering letter
integrity ceritificate - see the date?
Dr Arun Kupar's play 1
Dr Arun Kumar's play 2
Dr Arun Kumar's play 3
Dr Arun Kumar's paly 4

Dr Arun Kumar's play 5

 

 
Drdo

Compliance of CIC Decisions

9 Comments
RTI Cell DRDO letter head

No. RTI/02/2091/C/2011                                                                  27 Sep 2011

To,
Shri Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
21, Sunderwala, Raipur
Dehradun—248 008

Sub : Compliance of CIC Decisions

Please refer the subject decision of CIC 29 Jun 2011 received in this office on dated 03 Aug 2011

The information, as directed by CIC, is as under:

(1) File No. CIC/LS/A12011/000381

(a) The amount spent on Long Term Post Graduation Training Programme during 2008, 2009 and 2010 –  6,38,33,535/-

(b) The amount spent on PhD Programme under RT Scheme during 2008, 2009 and 2010 – 3,38,143/-

(2) File No. CIC/LS/A1201 1/000384

The total amount spent during 2008, 2009 and 2010 on the following Awards:

(a) Agni Award for excellence in self reliance – ‘ 75 Lakhs

(b) DRDO Award for Performance Excellence.- 60 Lakhs

(c) Scientist of the year Award — 60 Lakhs

(3) File No. CIC/LS/A12011/000385

(a) Numbers of papers published by the Scientist of DRDO during last five years:

Journal of Applied Physics — Nil

Electronics Letters – Nil

(4) File No. CIC/LS/A1201 1/000386

(a) Visits of Dr. Prahlada on official duty during 2009 & 2010. Number of visits to Hyderabad – 22

Total amount of TA/DA drawn – 4,11,900/-

(c) Visits made by Shri R C Aggarwal on official duty during 2007 to 2010. Number of visits — 26

Total amount of TA/DA drawn — 18, 23, 672/-

 (5) File No. CICILSIAI2O11/000387

Number of sanctioned strength of substantive Joint Directors and Deputy Directors in DRDO.

(a) Joint Directors — 04

(b) Deputy Directors — 20

(6) File No. CIC/LS/A12011/000412

Para wise reply pertaining to years 2009 and 2010 is as under:

(a) Total number of transit accommodation available in DRDO’s guest House at Delhi —105

(b) DRDO officials availing DRDO transit guest house facilities at Delhi for more than 30 days while they are posted in same station — 17

(c) Sh. S Ravi, Additional Director, DRDO HQrs availed DRDO guest house facility in Delhi during 10 Jul 2009 to 10 Sep 2010.

(d) Dr. Prahiada, CC R&D (Ae & SI) & DS, DRDO HQrs availed DRDO guest house facility in Delhi during 26 Mar 2010 to 20 Mar 2011.

(7) File No. CIC/LS/A1201 1/000413

No Gazette Notification of D0PT is available.

(Dr. A K Tyagi)
Scientist ‘F’
CPIO, DRDO HQ

 Copy to:

Central Information Commissioner –            With refer to your 10 decision dated
Room No. 308, B —Wing                                29 Jun 2011 in respect of Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
August Kranti Bhawan, Bikaji Kama Place
New Delhi – 1 10 066

Real Facts:  

1. File No. CIC/LS/A12011/000381

What I have asked in my RTI

  1. Total amount invested on long term post graduation training program and PhD program under R & T scheme, and under Post Graduate Training (PGT) scheme of DRDO during period forApril 1990 – March 2010 under following heads
              i)        Adhoc advances
             ii)       Study leave salary
            iii)       Reimbursement of expenditure on account of stationary items, preparation of thesis, purchase of books                         and journals etc.
           iv)        Non refundable fee
           v)         TA
          vi)        DA
          vii)      Financial incentive on acquiring higher qualification at their own
2.    Total number of official Grade wise/Post wise/ Categories wise received  MS/ME/MTech, PhD degree during period April 1990 – March 2010
          i)        Full time
         ii)       Part Time
         iii)     External Registration

 3.    The Institution from where degree of MTech/ PhD was awarded from April 1990 – March 2010

4.  Total amount invested on short term training/ workshops/seminars/courses in India (Including DIAT/ITM/IIM’s/ IIT’s, NIT’s, ESCI, ASCI, IISc’s etc.) and abroad, during period from April 1990 – March 2010

          i)        Training/ Courses/Delegations Fee/Registration Fee
          ii)       TA
         iii)     DA
5. Total number of Scientist resigned from April 1990 – March 2010

6.  Total number of scientist joined DRDO from April 1990 – March 2010

Why I asked this Information –

DRDO sends annually many officers for higher studies particulars to IIT’s and national Universities. The admission which granted normally after tough competitions are available to DRDO’s sponsored candidates was easily.

Aim of such higher studies is to use the academic platform to solve the complicate technical issues. DRDO in turn give the IIT’s or Universities sufficient grants against project and R&T schemes.

No one gets benefited neither the institutions nor the DRDO, it is because the most of the individuals after getting higher education working as admin, allied works, and  the reaction of this most of them leave the organization. For example Dr.DP Singh, Estate Manager, Scientist ‘F’ did his post graduation and PhDs from DRDO sponsoring and performing duty of admin purely non scientific assignment. Sh A.K Musla, Sc ‘F, holding post Joint Director Admin in IRDE, Dehradun, he also did his B.Tech and M.Tech from DRDO sponsored funds and working as purely in admin. I am quoting only two names as tip of the iceberg, because in DRDO you will find 100 of such cases. DRDO is shear wasting the corers and corers rupees public funds in the name of higher education programs. Although, the aim and object of the higher education program is really good, but in hands of bad corrupt officials, the output is wasting by DRDO.

According to the ministry, a total of 1,107 scientists, mostly young entrants, have resigned from the DRDO between 2003 and 2007, implying that on an average one person leaves every two days. 

What I have received

(a)          The amount spent on Long Term Post Graduation Training Programme during 2008, 2009 and 2010 –  6,38,33,535/-

(b)         The amount spent on PhD Programme under RT Scheme during 2008, 2009 and 2010 – 3,38,143/-

(2) File No. CIC/LS/A1201 1/000384

What I have asked in my RTI

The DRDO Awards Scheme, in its present form, was introduced in the year 1999 to motivate DRDO scientists, engineers and partners in industries and academic institutions in contributing for the cause of national security and self-reliance. The present Award Scheme, instituted by the Government of India, are therefore, meant to encourage DRDO scientists and our partners in the Private Sector Undertakings (PSUs), the private firms as well as the academic institutions in performing even better towards accelerating the pace of development of critical technologies, transfer of technologies from laboratories to industries as well as productionisation of the state-of-the-art defence systems

The Scheme consists of a total of 17 awards, out of which, 4 awards are given by the Directors of the concerned laboratories/establishments in recognition of outstanding contributions of their scientists and other supporting staff consisting of technical, administrative and allied cadres. The remaining 13 awards are decided at the DRDO HQrs for which nominations are called every year from all laboratories/establishments. The nominations are initially short listed by the Screening Committee under the chairmanship of the Chairman, Recruitment and Assessment Centre (RAC). The short listed nominations are, thereafter, examined by the Apex Committee for finalisation of the awards which also consists of two outside experts. These awards are normally given away by the Prime Minister of India on the “Technology Day” which falls on 11th May of every year.

In this connection it is requested to provide the following detail information

Total amount of investment made on DRDO awards  year wise from 1st April 1999 to till date 2010

i)           Total amount invested in arranging Award ceremony

ii)          TA/DA  on recipient of the awardees and spouse

iii)        All categories of all cash award by all Laboratories/Establishments and DRDO Hqrs. during period of April 1999 to till date. In following format

Why I asked this Information –

The awards given by Government of India like Padma Award, Shanti Swaroop Bhatnager Award etc all these awards are given with an aim to encourage/motivate/ recognize the contribution of individual recipients and therefore it carries a citation.

DRDO constituted its awards like Scientist of the year, Young Scientist awards, Technology Leadership Award etc. with the aim to inculcate a culture of hard work, dedication, scientific achievements, and technology breakthrough leading to the technology development for national security.

But the award given in DRDO, the mode of selection, the encouragement to the scientific team does not rely on the standards.

Different rules for different occasion or different rules for different officer, the motto of DRDO or the definition of DRDO is suitably implemented..

The public would like to know the manner DRDO spending nearly 2 crores of rupees annually to   these awards, the recipients does not know that he has been chosen for this award, there is no scientific presentation of technology. The recipients, are even unable to operate any scientific instruments  like network analyzer, spectrum analyzer etc because most of awardees scientist or technical personals are working as Director Management Services, Head Material Managements, Security Officer, Library In-charge, Works  In-charge and other suitable position from where they can feed their Akas(Boss).

If any one look in to the list of award recipients and analyses year wise, he will be find the most of citation actually not even justify the work or relation between award and awardees.

There is N number of examples available in various labs where most of awards were not justified; it is purely depending upon the Director’s choice. So nut shell DRDO awards are like ”Andha banten revari apne apne ko de” it is nothing doing with their contribution whether the awardees is related to technology or not. How come a person sitting in security, MT will entitled to get technology award, when DRDO having other awards for non technical working area.

It is really big question in front of country people?

Like in Kargil, one officer got gallantry award and later it was found that the fake encounter was staged for award. (Famous ketchup Colonel Case) 

Same tactics is adopted by DRDO they are distributing awards to their own boys with fake technology propaganda.

Since money belongs to poor tax payers, when Padama award citation are available to citizen of India then how can DRDO deny  give details in the name of schedule –II exemption.

One award Defence Technology Absorption Award is using by DRDO for giving color to their pet firms. Anyone can judge from the recipients list that these firms are really worth does these firms have any significant signature in field of respective industry like M/s Resins & Allied Products, Vijayawada. received this award from Honorable Prime Minister Sh Man Mohan Singh is   related to Dr. A. Subhananda Rao, CC R&D, Director, HEMRL)

What I have received

The total amount spent during 2008, 2009 and 2010 on the following Awards:

(a)                Agni Award for excellence in self reliance – ‘ 75 Lakhs

(b)                DRDO Award for Performance Excellence.- 60 Lakhs

(c)                 Scientist of the year Award — 60 Lakhs

(3) File No. CIC/LS/A12011/000385

What I have asked in my RTI

  1. How many technical paper were published by DRDO Scientists in International Journals like Journal of Applied Physics, IEEE Transactions, Proceedings IEEE, Transactions IEE, Electronics Letter, SPICE etc. from 1990 to March 2010?
  2. How many authors were awarded by DRDO for their contribution and keeping the flag of DRDO high
  3. How many such authors were assigned the administrative task to lead the DRDO Labs as Director and then CC R&D?
  4. How many such authors were left the DRDO during April 1990 to March 2010 period?

Why I asked this Information –

Almost 400 Corers of rupees are distributing through these boards and different DRDO projects to IIT’s, Universities’ and Colleges and even some NGO’s, in the name of  expanding and deepening the knowledge-base, Enhancing core competence in the field of knowledge, To encourage and provide funds for basic research in pertinent scientific disciplines etc.

The most of funds distributed till date to maximum private universities and private institutions and especially in last ten years out of total grants has gone to southern states. DRDO in its charter of duty has specifically mentioned Kashmir to Kanyakumari and Gujarat to North East the equal opportunity will given to universities/institutions.

The DRDO is giving funding for various R&T projects with IIT’s, IIsc’s and various premier scientific institutions. In return DRDO sends annually many officers for higher studies particulars to IIT’s and national Universities.

The number of international papers can justify the real out of projects working with IIT, IIsc and other various institutions.

I am surprised that DRDO is deny for giving information related to paper publish in international journals, where is schedule-ii exemption is comes in between.

Information sought is already publish in journals, so why DRDO afraid to give information. It shows that DRDO is not respect for RTI Act 2005.

International publications are basically the most valuable achievement of any scientific institute /organization and it always proudly mentioned by each and every institute /organization.

What I have received

(a) Numbers of papers published by the Scientist of DRDO during last five years:

Journal of Applied Physics — Nil

Electronics Letters – Nil

(4) File No. CIC/LS/A1201 1/000386

What I have asked in my RTI

With Reference to Dr Prahlada, DS & CC R&D (Ae & SI)

  1.  After taking his charge as CC R&D at DRDO Hqrs, how many days he stayed in DRDO Hqrs up to 31st March 2010
  2. How many temporary duties to Hyderabad he had been with total stay at Hyderabad.
  3.  How much in total TA/DA he has drawn year wise from his joining as CC R&D at DRDO up to 31st March 2010.

With Reference to Shri  RC Agarwal, Director DEAL, Dehradun

  1. After taking his charge as Director DEAL, Dehradun , how many days he stayed in Dehradun up to 31st March 2010
  2. How many temporary duties to Bangalore he had been with total stay at Bangalore
  3.  How much in total TA/DA he has drawn year wise from his joining as Director, DEAL up to  31st March 2010.

Why I asked this Information

The information sought for is not related to end senior officer in his individual/personal capacity but in his capacity being a public authority.

Too frequent visit to a particular destination on Government expenses require to justify and as to how much it was beneficial to the organization and how much to the officer especially when he belongs to that particular destination. It appears that the permanent residence is his Hqrs and place of posting is a temporary duty station. The frequent move availability of the officer in the Hqrs. station may lead to problem of command and control and discipline, which may hamper the progress and led to undue delay and time and cost overrun to ongoing projects of DRDO.

In this particular case I requested the TD details of Dr. Prahlada, Appellate Authority, CC R&D (Ae & SI) & DS, who is staying C-7 Qutab Enclave, DRDO guest house since his posting to DRDO Hqrs, for him most of time he took his breakfast in his Hyderabad residence and lunch in DRDO Hqrs and evening for dinner he was again back to his Hyderabad residence. Please see his TD detail and then decide.

Second one is Shri  RC Aggarwal, Director DEAL, Dehradun, since his posting he use to out  from DEAL, Dehradun almost more than 250 days out of 365 days. How can the armed forces expect trustworthy products from these so called senior scientists?

There more 9-10 CC R&D and Directors who are belongs to Hyderabad and Bangalore and their families are staying Hyderabad and Bangalore respectively and they all are staying in DRDO guest houses they are giving their residence address in telephone directory at DRDO guest houses and enjoying HRA also. They are frequent fliers, they all are already break the Milkha Singh ‘s (Flying Sikh of India)  records and relishing without fear with TD with poor tax payers money.

What I have received

(a)          Visits of Dr. Prahlada on official duty during 2009 & 2010. Number of visits to Hyderabad – 22

(b)         Total amount of TA/DA drawn – 4,11,900/-

(c)          Visits made by Shri R C Aggarwal on official duty during 2007 to 2010. Number of visits — 26

(d)         Total amount of TA/DA drawn — 18, 23, 672/-

 

Drdo

Aap Ki Adalat—Episode -I (William)

1 Comment

Dear Friends

Following is the contribution of honest, hardworking, sincere and sensitive government servants’ of DRDO, Ministry of Defence concern to national defence.

I acknowledge their sincerely and commitment towards uprooting the corruption, nepotism, favoritism prevailing in DRDO.

Regards

Prabhu Dandriyal

Aap ki Adalat

Sh PDD (DRDO Anna) and all non corrupt colleagues of DRDO

A group of part time artists (from DRTC, DRDS, Admin) from headquarters and Delhi labs are starting a old and well known method of STREET PLAY to highlight Corruption, Bhai chara, carelessness in management of our DRDO for last 2 years by Retired team of Chief controllers, Corrupt Directors and MOST CORRUPT SA to RM. WE are using street as Website of Sh PDD. All are affected; scientists are also affected by mis-rule of DR VKS. First 6-8 episodes will be on DrVKS, honorable (?????) SA to RM. This will be followed by -WILLIAM SELVAMURTHY, PS GOEL and all “Distinguished”. Outstanding” and “Dictators (Directors)” . The frequency of episodes will be flexible, keep seeing our Anna’s website and give your comments for any particular topic and person to be called in Aap ki Adalat.

 

Aap Ki Adalat—Episode I (William)

Dear Viewers, Dr VKS was abroad, we invitedC, DRDO, The recording time was at 10 am and he reached our studio at 6 am after doing his Yoga. We appreciated his punctuality and fitness.

RS: Good morning viewers, please welcome Dr W Selvamurthy

WS: call me William, I like this

RS: First blame on

WS: God bless all of you, yoga is a must. If all 30 thousand workforce of ours learn yoga and take classes of 12 crores army Jawans, we will get visibility, publicity, negative forces will be removed. But no one listens to me. Doing science, it can be done in deep located Tamilnadu universities. We give 5 percent so far, I propose to increase it to 50 percent, PLEASE CLAP, money will be given only to unknown colleges and universities of Tamilnadu.

RS: The first blame on you is…

WS: Please WAIT, we will come to blame later, we should do innovations, our respectable SA has declared this year as Innovation year. I will give 3-4 innovations we did recently. First was done by me, I converted one admin lady officer into a senior scientist, SA was so happy with this innovation that I was given LIFE TIME ACHIEVEMENT award

RS: I say, you must get Noble prize, such a great innovation

WS: Yes, I should, can we discuss after shooting over. Tandon, our procurement expert. He innovated a novel method for keep track of a deal after negotiations are completed, for delivery of agreed He invented this in Kanpur but perfected in headquarters. He transferred this technology to all our lab directors, it is helping them lot. Goel (Chairman RAC) also felt that he has done very good science and promoted him in 4 years.

RS: Really Great Achievement

WS: AK Singh, our HR expert, har marz ki ek dava. He invented a mechanism how to recruit human resources along with side by side, a great achievement. Dr GoeI was not impressed with his great achievement, he feels RAC technology is much foolproof than his, but SA intervened and certified it is a very high caliber research. Shukia, I am not much aware about his achievement, but if Goel found him fit to be promoted in 4 years, he must have done GREAT SCIENCE. Goel cannot be wrong. MERIT (???) COMES FIRST is principle of Goel.

RS: First blame on

WS: Blame on me? I am God tearing person, no no i don’t fear about this Prabhu Dandriyal, But I am God fearing, no blame, yes, we can discuss

RS: you dream that you are the best person to become SA and for this you are destroying DRDO

WS: One must dream, Dr VKS is super genius SA. Arunachlam, Kalam, Atrey, Natrajan, all useless fellows. I will wait till he is 70

RS: You will also be 70? Also Dr VKS called you Badmash?

WS: Yoga Power, I will be SA for 5 years…….He is Great, I am his servant. I am happy he called me Badmash, does he call everybody Badmash? So, I am Special. We should do Great work like Dr VKS. We should support him for all his Great work. Good Pillai has gone, Prahlad has left, he needs my support and experience in fooling Ministers and Services. We are made for each other.

RS: Thank you, we will finish here

WS: Such a small episode? I have many innovations like SASTRA University money route and dreams to share

RS: Next time. Viewers thanks for joining us.

(Shooting stops. Dr WS asks RS, what about Noble Prize, what is best method, I will sanction a 1.00 crore project if it is Ok to get Noble Prize, but for this Noble cause help me)