Tag Archives: CPIO

Drdo

Sh Avinash Chander is not interested to take any action on DMSRDE corruption cases

7 Comments
To                                                                                                        1st  November 2014
Hon’ble
Shri Arun Jaitly,
Raksha Mantri,
Room No 104, South Block,
New Delhi-110011

 

SUBJECT:  Sh Avinash Chander is not interested to take any action on DMSRDE corruption cases.

Sir,

I would like to draw your kind attention towards corruption in tunes of crores at Defence Materials & Stores Research & Development Establishment (DMSRDE), Kanpur, an establishment under Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO), Ministry of Defence, Government of India.

Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena was appointed as Scientist ‘C’ on 28.04.1984 in DMSRDE, Kanpur and since then he is continuously posted at DMSRDE, Kanpur since last 30 years. He has not been transferred even for a day from Kanpur and since the date of his posting he is working at Kanpur.  The roots of the Dr. Saxena while working at DMSRDE, Kanpur has become so deep that he was involved in various activities involving the financial & other administrative irregularities.

Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena, Scientist ‘G’ was appointed as Director, DMSRDE, Kanpur wef 01 January 2011. In spite of the fact that he has been involved in various financial and administrative irregularities , Dr. Saxena was  promoted to the rank of Scientist ‘H’ wef 02 August 2012 and since then he is  holding the rank of Scientist ‘H’ and working as Director, DMSRDE.

The right from his appointment as Director, he was involved in various kinds of administrative & financial irregularities that lead corruption in tunes of crores. Several complaints were made against Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena to then Defence Minister by some scientists of DMSRDE.

Being a RTI activist and social worker running a website corruptionindrdo.com to expose the corruption in DRDO, also made as far as 12 complaints regarding corruption in procurements of various instruments & materials etc in DMSRDE by Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena, Director, DMSRDE to CVC, Hon’ble Defence Minister and DGR&D, DRDO. These complaints were filed during 29 Nov 2013 to 11 June 2014. Total cost of store items procured against which complaints were filed is about Rs. 7.5 crore. A complete list of complaints filed by me to CVC and Hon’ble Defence Minister is annexed as Annexure No. -1.

All the aforesaid complaints made have been endorsed by Central Vigilance Commission (CVC). CVC has taken cognizance of aforesaid complaints and registered on prima facia.  These complaints have been forwarded to Chief Vigilance Office (CVO), Ministry of Defence for further enquiry/investigation of the aforesaid complaints. Under the provisions of RTI Act 2005 the CPIO, CVC vide letter no. CVC/RTI/13/1862/241925 dated 18.03.2014 informed to me that his complaints have been forwarded to CVO (MOD) for investigation.

Under RTI Act, CPIO, CVO MOD informed that all complaints have been forwarded to Director, Vigilance & Security, DRDO for further inquiry and asked the consolidated report from DRDO vide their letter dated 04 August 2014.

Meantime, A FFIC was constituted by Shri Avinash Chander, DG, DRDO to inquire the complaints against Dr. Saxena. The Fact Finding Inquiry Committee visited DMSRDE, Kanpur on 13th – 14th, March 2014 for inquiry on the complaint submitted against Dr. Saxena. The said committee submitted its report to Shri Avinash Chander but no action taken by DRDO against Dr. Saxena, Director.

It is very surprising and interesting that Shri Avinash Chander again set up another four members Fact Finding Inquiry Committee  under chairmanship of Dr. D.C. Pandey, Scientist ‘H’ LRDE and three members Sri Hari Babu Srivastava, Scientist ‘G’, Director, LASTECH, Sri Jagdeep, Scientist ‘F’ and Sri R.S. Mehta, Joint Director. The said committee visited DMSRDE, Kanpur recently on 9-10 July 2014. Therefore constitution of two FFIC by Shri Avinash Chander establishes that there were complaints against Dr. Saxena but to give him patronage and support the Shri Avinash Chander set up illegal FFIC. This second FFIC also submitted its report to Shri Avinash Chander but still no action against Dr. A.K Saxena took place by DRDO.

Interestingly, 31st October in the eve of Vigilance week, Sh. R.S. Mehta, Joint Director, Vigilance, DRDO in his address mentioned to audience that how the corrupt practices adopted by Director, DMSRDE and his team in procurement cases.

Sir, it is not understandable that why Shri Avinash Chander constituted two fact finding committees? Why DRDO is silent on corruption cases of DMSRDE, Kanpur? Why Shri Avinash Chander is protecting Dr. A.K. Saxena?

In light of the above mentioned facts, it is requested that speedy action needed to save precious funds of poor tax payers. Dr A K Saxena openly using same corrupt practices in ongoing procurements cases. He told to his beloved team that Dr. V Bhujanga Rao, DG,NS&IC directed that left Rs 13 crores should be spend up to 31st March 2015 positively.

Regards
 
Prabhu  Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun
Ph   0135 2787750, Mobile 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website   www.corruptionindrdo.com

Annexure:-

  1. List of complaints/cases filed to CVC and Defence Minister against Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena, Director, DMSRDE, Kanpur

    DMSRDE CVC Cases
    DMSRDE CVC Cases
Drdo

RTI – DRDO,TO ‘D’ Post valid financial concurrence ?

5 Comments
To                                                                                                                   6th October 2014
Shri K K Singh, IDAS,
Addl.CDA, CPIO,
O/o PCDA (R&D), West Block-V,
R K PURAM,
NEW DELHI- 110066

 

Hello,

Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005 in respect of concurrence of Ministry of Defence (Integrated Finance R&D) ID No. 1384/IF (R&D)/2006 dated 1st June 2006.

  1. Provide the certified copy of concurrence of Ministry of Defence (Integrated Finance R&D) ID No. 1384/ IF (R&D)/2006 dated 1st June 2006.
  2. Name competent authority of issuing above concurrence by Integrated Finance R&D.
  3. Ministry of Finance approval for issuing above said concurrence by Integrated Finance R&D.
  4. Copy of request/ proposal of DRDO on which concurrence was given by Ministry of Defence (Integrated Finance R&D).
  5. Whether this concurrence was given by Ministry of Defence (Integrated Finance R&D) to DRDO only for individuals promoted on 2006 as Technical Officer -D (Yes/No)

Regards

Prabhu Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun -248008
0135- 2787750, 9411114879,
prabhudoon@gmail.com , www.corruptionindrdo.com

Enclosed– DRDO RTI Reply No. RTI/01/ 2091/P/2013/0216   dated 23 August 2013 

                         Registration Number            MODEF/R/2014/61836 

DRDO RTI Reply
DRDO RTI Reply

TO D position1 TO D position2

Drdo

RTI – Madras High court directed the Government to take appropriate departmental action against Sh.G MALAKONDIAH, CC (R&D), DRDO

1 Comment
To                                                                                                                 6th October 2014
Sh A. M. Manichan,
Under Secretary (IC-IV), CPIO,
Ministry of Defence,
Department of Defence,
Sena Bhavan, New Delhi – 110011

 

Hello,

Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005 in respect of Sh.G MALAKONDIAH, CC (R&D), DRDO   held guilty for civil contempt under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and   punished with Simple Imprisonment for a period of three weeks and also pay a fine of Rs.2,000/ by Honorable Madras High Court on 24.09.2014. Further court directed the Government to take appropriate departmental action against them for the reckless negligence and willful disobedience of the orders of this Court.Madras High Court Contempt Petition No. 1711/2012 arising out of Writ Petition No. 13067/2005

  1. Provide under which CCS Rules the departmental action taken by Ministry of Defence as directed by Honorable Madras High Court on 24.09.2014 against Sh.G MALAKONDIAH, CC (R&D), DRDO.
  2. Provide the policy and guideline of Ministry of Defence to take actions/ implement on various court orders.
  3. Provide if any time limits to implement court directions in Ministry of Defence.
  4. Provide the file No of case initiate by Ministry of Defence as directed by Honorable Madras High Court on 24.09.2014 against Sh.G MALAKONDIAH, CC (R&D), DRDO.

Regards

Prabhu Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun -248008
0135- 2787750, 9411114879,
prabhudoon@gmail.com www.corruptionindrdo

Registration Number      MODEF/R/2014/61834

Drdo

Poor Tax payer money wasted to save corrupt DRDO officials – RTI – MOD (Sh.G MALAKONDIAH, CC (R&D), DRDO, (DOB 1-Jan-1951Retiring on 31st December )(Supreme Court Stay Order)

Leave a comment
To                                                                                            30th September 2014
Sh A. M. Manichan,
Under Secretary (IC-IV), CPIO,
Ministry of Defence,
Department of Defence,
Sena Bhavan, New Delhi

 

Hello,

Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005 in respect of Sh.G MALAKONDIAH, CC (R&D), DRDO  held guilty for civil contempt under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and   punished with Simple Imprisonment for a period of three weeks and also pay a fine of Rs.2,000/ by Honorable Madras High Court on 24.09.2014. Subsequently Sh.G MALAKONDIAHfiled   an appeal   in      SUPREME COURT OF INDIA on 25th September 2014 and got stay on Madras High Court order of 24th September 2014. In Supreme Court there are four advocates were present for appellant Sh.G MALAKONDIAH  

For Appellant(s)      Mr.   Mukul Rohtagi, AG
                                    Mr.   R. Bala, Adv.
                                    Mr.   R.K. Verma, Adv.
                                    Mr.   B. V. Balaram Das, Adv.
  1. Provide the Ministry of Defence rule position for providing advocates to government servant.
  2. Number of advocates
  3. Limit of fees
  4. The criteria for providing advocates
  5. In case of Sh.G MALAKONDIAH provide the total expenditure done by Ministry of Defence.
  6. Provide the advocate fee given to each one for Sh.G MALAKONDIAH case.

   

Regards

Prabhu Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun -248008
0135- 2787750, 9411114879,
prabhudoon@gmail.com, www.corruptionindrdo.com                                                      Registration Number            MODEF/R/2014/61806 

 

ITEM NO.56                              COURT NO.4               SECTION XII

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Civil Appeal Diary No(s).                 31977/2014

 G MALAKONDIAH                                                                Appellant(s)

VERSUS

  S. JOSEPH RAJ AND ORS                                              

Respondent(s)

(with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/copy as well as plain copy of the impugned order and permission to file appeal. And office report)

WITH C.A. D 31978/2014

(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/copy as well as plain copy of the impugned order and appln.(s) for permission to file appeal. and Office Report)

Date : 26/09/2014 This appeal was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA CHANDRA PANT

 

For Appellant(s)                  Mr.   Mukul Rohtagi, AG
                                    Mr.   R. Bala, Adv.
                                    Mr.   R.K. Verma, Adv.
                                    Mr.   B. V. Balaram Das,Adv.
  For Respondent(s)                 Mr. V. Balaji,Adv.
                                    Mr. Asai Thambi, Adv.
                                    Mr. Rakesh K. Sharma, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

Permission to file appeal is granted.Perused the photocopy of the certified copy of the order dated 24.09.2014 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Signature Not Verified Judicature at Madras in Contempt Petition No. 1711 of 2012.

Digitally signed by

Rajni Mukhi

Date: 2014.09.29

12:12:10 IST

Reason: Petitioner is allowed two weeks’ time to file affidavit enclosing the copy of the said order.

Notice be issued on respondents returnable within four weeks. Dasti, in addition, is permitted.

Mr. Rakesh K. Sharma, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of Respondent No.1.   He may file counter affidavit within three weeks. Rejoinder   Affidavit, if any, be filed   within a week thereafter.

In the meantime, the order dated 24 th September, 2014 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Contempt Petition No. 1711/2012 arising out of Writ Petition No. 13067/2005 and sub Application No. 602 of 2012 shall remain stayed.

(Rajni Mukhi)                                    (H.S. Parasher)

Sr. P.A.                                                       Court Master

Drdo

RTI-DOPT- DRDO Extension Buisness

2 Comments
To                                                                                                               26th September 2014
Sh Subandhu Basu,
US (SM-I), CPIO,
Room no. 23, North Block,
New Delhi -110001

 

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of OFFICE MEMORANDUM  F.No.22/35/2011-EO (SM.II) 24th September, 2014 Sub: Grant of extension/re-employment to Central Government servants beyond the age of superannuation.  In Para 1 – The ACC has observed that in some of the cases, the Departments are not taking timely action to reconstitute the Departmental Peer Review Committee (DPRC) and are unilaterally extending the service of the officers beyond the age of superannuation without first obtaining approval of the ACC.

  1. Provide the name of officials and name of their respective departments who were get extension in service beyond superannuation for two years without first obtaining approval of the ACC from January 2011 to till date as mentioned in above OM
  2.  Provide the name of officials and name of their respective departments who were get extension in service after 62 to 64 years without first obtaining approval of the ACC from January 2011 to till date as mentioned in above OM.
  3. Provide the total number of DRDO officials granted extension for two years 60 to 62 years from January 2010 to till date.
  4.  Provide the total number of DRDO officials granted extension for two years 62 to 64 years from January 2010 to till date.

 

Regards
 
Prabhu  Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur,
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website www.corruptionindrdo.com

Registration Number     DOP&T/R/2014/63933

Drdo

Scientific Nexus – RTI – DRDO

1 Comment

To,                                                                 25th September 2014
Dr. RB Sharma, CPIO,
DRDO HQ, Min. of Defence,
DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg,
New Delhi-110011

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of Project- Fabrication and characterization of substrate for patch antenna by using nano magneto-dielectric materials for the nano magneto-dielectric materials. The project was sanctioned to Dr Atul Thakur , Shoolini University, Bajhol, Solan-Oachghat-Kumarhatti Highway, Solan, HP. The Sanctioned amount of project is Rs 9.9 Lakh plus equipment of worth Rs 50 Lakhs for the period of 2012 to 2014.

1. Provide the copy of Project Proposal Application Form for the project – Fabrication and characterization of substrate for patch antenna by using nano magneto-dielectric materials for the missile applications. by Dr Atul Thakur , Shoolini University, Solan.

2. Provide the name and designation of DRDO official who has sanctioned the project to Dr Atul Thakur.

3. Provide the date of sanction of the project – Fabrication and characterization of substrate for patch antenna by using nano magneto-dielectric materials for the missile applications to Dr Atul Thakur.

4. Whether the DRDO official who was sanctioned this project to Dr Atul Thakur registered for PhD under Dr Atul Thakur (Yes/No)

Regards

Prabhu Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun -248008
0135- 2787750, 9411114879,
prabhudoon@gmail.com www.corruptionindrdo.com

Registration Number MODEF/R/2014/61773

Research-Grant-Shoolini-University-Solan
Research-Grant-Shoolini-University-Solan

 

Drdo

Scientific Nexus – RTI – DAE

Leave a comment
To                                                                                                      25th September 2014
Shri Arun Srivastava,
Secretary, CPIO,
Atomic Energy Commission,
OYC Building, C.S.M. Marg,
Mumbai-400001

 

Hello,

Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of project- Nano Magneto-dielectric materials for high frequency applications -sanction to Dr Atul Thakur,  Shoolini University  Bajhol,  Solan-Oachghat-Kumarhatti Highway, Solan, HP.. The project granted by DAE under BOARD OF RESEARCH IN NUCLEAR SCIENCES (BRNS) The project cost Rs 18.23 Lakh  and Period 2012- 2014.

  1. Provide the copy of Project Proposal Application Form for the project -Nano Magneto-dielectric materials for high frequency applications- by Dr Atul Thakur Shoolini University, Solan.
  2. Provide the name and designation of DAE official who has sanctioned the project to Dr Atul Thakur.
  3. Provide the date of sanction of the project –Nano Magneto-dielectric materials for high frequency applications to Dr Atul Thakur.
Regards
 
Prabhu  Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun -248008 
0135- 2787750,   9411114879,  
prabhudoon@gmail.com    www.corruptionindrdo.com
Drdo

RTI- CAIR- PC Procurement PAC basis – Dr KD Nayak, DG, (DRDO’s Gem Manipulator)

10 Comments
To,                                                                                               17th September 2014
Dr. RB Sharma, CPIO,
DRDO HQ, Min. of Defence,
DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg,
New Delhi-110011                             

 

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of procurement of PCs from M/s Tata Power by CAIR, DRDO, Bangalore. To favor M/S Tata Power demands raised against the laid down rule of PM-2006 approved purchased manual of DRDO, The procurement was done in PAC. It is not understood how universal available Personal Computer can become PAC item. In the name of secrecy exemptions are being obtained for publishing in Central Public Procurement Portal (CPP).

As per PM-2006 para 7.8 – SINGLE TENDER WITH PAC: This system will be adopted in respect of

Following cases on certification by the Director of Lab/Estt that no other Make/brand can be used.

(a) Proprietary articles which are monopoly product of a single manufacturer. If possible, a certificate in this regard may be obtained from the concerned firm, before Director Signs the PAC.

The DG involved in this procurement is Dr. KD Nayak who is best manipulator in such kind of procurement please refer to

CBI report No.PE-3(A) /2001 of DEAL, DRDO, Dehradun-Two special PARA of report is

The recommendation of the TPC was approved by Director and the statement of case was prepared for obtaining sanction for approval of purchase from competetent authority i.e SA to RM as in case of single tender the FINANCIAL competence of Director of Lab is restricted to Rs 1 Lakh. The statement of case put up DRDO under the signature of Dr.AS Bains and Dr.KD Nayak dt 7th Oct 1997 sate that the requirement of………

The deal for the purchase was approved by the then SA to RM Dr.APJ Abul Kalam. However the only bone of connection is fact that when the supplier asked for change of nomenclature and replacing the word down convertor with integrated circuit, Dr AS Bains, director of the lab had approved of the TPC recommendation and have not referred this matter of change of nomenclature to SA to RM as the deal was approved by him.

The care procured Rs 40-50 thousand PC in nearly 5.5 Lakhs with following demands.

  1. 14SSD228 – 6 March 2014-    Rs   9580774.00- M/S Tata Power
  2. 14SSD237 –19 March 2014-   Rs   9881360.00- M/S Tata Power
  3. 14SSD136 – 26 August 2014- Rs 58051500.00- M/S Tata Power
  1. Please provide proprietary certificate given by M/S Tata Power.
  2. Copy of statement case where justification mentioned about proprietary case.
  3. List of TPC members who approved the above case.

The above case is the example of corrupt practice followed by DRDO in the name of secrecy government India can verify from the expert of DOE.

Regards
Prabhu Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur,
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website www.corruptionindrdo.com

Registration Number  MODEF/R/2014/61715

Drdo

RTI-II- Sri Saroj Kumar Patel, Husband of Smt. Tessy Thomas, Missile Women

Leave a comment
To,                                                                                               17th September 2014
Dr. RB Sharma, CPIO,
DRDO HQ, Min. of Defence,
DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg,
New Delhi-110011                             

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect selection proceeding of Director Quality, Reliability & Safety (QRS) in DRDO Hqrs.

  1. Directorate of Quality, Reliability & Safety (QRS) has been created at DRDO HQ, New Delhi vide Govt. of India, MOD letter (NS&M)/QARS/C/M/01/2638/D(R&D) dated 27th September 2012.
  2. RAC issued Advt. No. 110/December 2012 for recruitment of 01 Scientist G with Discipline Mechanical Engg. & Experience in the Quality, Reliability and Safety.
  3. Letter No. DOP/11/110059/QRSM/M/02 dated 14 August 2013 of Directorate of Personnel, DRDO, MOD, New Delhi on the Subject- Appointment of Director, QRS, DRDO HQ, New Delhi.
  4. RAC issued Advt No. 112/ October 2013 for recruitment of 01 Scientist G for DQRS, DRDO with Essential Qualification: At least First class Bachelor’s Degree in Engg./Technology in Mechanical Engg./Aeronautical Engg./ Electrical Engg./ Electronics & Communication Engg. only and Experience: At least 15 years’ experience in areas of quality planning, quality assurance, quality control, and quality improvements.
  5. Recruitment of Sri Saroj Kumar Patel as Scientist G in DRDO against Advt No. 112/October 2013 in March 2014 at seniority no. 486 who joined DRDO on 27 March 2014.
  6. Appointment of Sri Saroj Kumar Patel, Scientist G as Director, Directorate Quality, Reliability & Safety (QRS) with effect from 31 March 2014 vide order No. DOP/05/53269/DQR&S/M/02 dated 31 March 2014.

Kindly provide following information under Section 6 of RTI Act 2005.

  1. The total number of applications received by DOP/DRDO HQ against the letter of DOP dated 14 August 2013 mentioned above at point (iii) and number of candidates appeared in interview/screening for the said post.
  2. Whether any Scientist G serving in DRDO was found suitable for post of Director, DQRS.(Yes/No)
  3. If yes then provide his details like name, seniority & establishment.
  4. File noting for appointment of Sri Saroj Kumar Patel, Scientist G as Director, DQRS, DRDO HQ, New Delhi.
  5. Whether any other names were considered for post of Director, DQRS, DRDO HQ in March 2014 by DRDO.(Yes/No)
  6. If yes then provide the names of Scientist G that were considered along with Sri Saroj Kumar Patel, Scientist G.

“The abuse/misuse of power for personal gain is corruption”. The information sought in this RTI Application pertains to allegations of corruption and as such not exempted u/s 24(1) of the RTI Act 2005.

Regards

Prabhu Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur,
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website www.corruptionindrdo.com  
 
Registration Number            MODEF/R/2014/61705
Drdo

RTI- Sri Saroj Kumar Patel, Husband of Smt. Tessy Thomas, Agni Putri

2 Comments
To,                                                                                               16th September 2014
Dr. RB Sharma, CPIO
DRDO HQ, Min. of Defence
DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg
New Delhi-110011                             

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of Sri Saroj Kumar Patel, Scientist G who has been appointed as Director, Directorate Quality, Reliability & Safety (QRS) with effect from 31 March 2014 vide order No. DOP/05/53269/DQR&S/M/02 dated 31 March 2014. His wife Smt. Tessy Thomas is Director, Advanced System Laboratory, Hyderabad (ASL) and permanently residing at Hyderabad since past several years.

  1. Temporary duty total number of days of Sri Saroj Kumar Patel, Scientist G since his posting at DRDO HQ in New Delhi to Hyderabad upto 31 August 2014.
  2. The local address of Sri Saroj Kumar Patel, Scientist G.
  3. Whether Sri Saroj Kumar Patel, Scientist G is occupying Government accommodation/DRDO Guest House in New Delhi.(Yes/No)
  4. If yes then provide the HRA details paid to him with effect from his posting at DRDO HQ till date.

Note : It is observed that it is common practice of DRDO officials specially who are posted in DRDO Hqrs using Government accommodations /guest houses for long durations and simultaneously claimed HRA. The Letter of Ex DOP, Dr Arun Kumar in this respect enclosed herewith.

The abuse/misuse of power for personal gain is corruption. The information sought in this RTI Application pertains to allegations of corruption and as such not exempted u/s 24(1) of the RTI Act as per CIC decisions.

Regards

Prabhu Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur,
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website www.corruptionindrdo.com

  Enclosed: The Letter of Ex DOP, Dr Arun Kumar regarding HRA matter

Registration Number MODEF/R/2014/61700

The Letter of Ex DOP, Dr Arun Kumar regarding HRA matter
 Letter of Ex DOP, Dr Arun Kumar regarding HRA matter