Continuously Manipulations in recruitment of scientists in Recruitment and Assessment Centre (RAC), Ministry of Defence, (DRDO). Part-2

To                                                                                                          31st   March 2015                 Hon’ble Shri Manohar Parrikar,                                                                                                     Defence Minister,                                                                                                                               Room No -104, South Block,                                                                                                           New Delhi-110011

Subject: Continuously Manipulations in recruitment of scientists in Recruitment and Assessment Centre (RAC), Ministry of Defence, (DRDO).  Part-2

Sir,

  1. Every day I am receiving letters from DRDO scientists who are witnessing the manipulations and corrupt practices of Dr A K Singh, DOP, and Dr R.K Jain, Director, RAC.
  2. Recruitment & Assessment Centre is basically working as derailing force for DRDO projects because recruitment of incompetents and promotions of again incompetents create frustrations among the deserve ones result is witnessing by country DRDO’s failure in each and every field.
  3. Sir, we believe that up to 2019 you are going to repeat same answers of delays of DRDO projects, right from LCA to …………
  4. Sir following letter is tip of iceberg of RAC, DRDO.
  5. Dr. Raju Brahma born in 14th December 1974 , joined DRDO in 2000 as Scientist ‘B’ and now in 2015 he become Scientist ‘F’ via shortcut.
  6. It is requested to investigate the role of Dr A K Singh, DOP, Dr R.K Jain, Director, RAC and Lt Gen Anoop Malhotra, Chief Controller R&D (R&M) on light of following letter.
  7. Dr. Raju Brahma appointment is fixing for SPIC and everyone in DRDO and MoD knows the SPIC’s adventures, it is kamdhenu for corrupt DRDO scientists.

Regards

Prabhu Dandriyal                                                                                                                               21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun                                                                                                 Ph   0135 2787750, Mobile 9411114879,                                                                                       e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website   www.corruptionindrdo.com

                                    Congratulations, DR RAJU BRAHMA !

Your name has been recommended under Item No.5 of Advt 115.
For further queries please contact HQ DRDO, DOP (Pers), Telephone No. 011-23007229, 23007676.Dr Raju BrahmaDr Raju Brahma1Dr Raju Brahma2Dr Raju Brahma envelop

 

Appeal for Justice -Dr. Rohidas Gopinath Taware Ex TO’B’, HEMRL, Pune

Modi ji make a separate department to handle DRDO’s cases, grievances, corruptions cases and lot of inputs are flowing to PMO

From:

Dr. Rohidas Gopinath Taware                                                                                                        (Ex TO’B’, HEMRL,Pune)                                                                                                                 A- 11, Vijayraj Sankul,Near Medipoint Hospital,                                                                         P. Road, Aundh, Pune- 411 007.                                                                                                     M: 9423015022, Resi.: 020-2729888                                                                                           Email          : rohidas.taware@yahoo.com

To                                             Date:  10th Dec. 2014                                               Hon’ble Shri. Narendra Modi,                                                                                             Prime Minister, Room No.152,                                                                                                       PMO, South Block, New Delhi-110011.

Subject:     Appeal for Justice’.

Respected Sir,

Very humbly, I submit as under:

  1. I, Dr. Rohidas Gopinath Taware was working as a Group ‘A’ Gazetted officer with designation Technical Officer ‘B’ in High Energy Materials Research Laboratory (HEMRL), Pune- 411021, DRDO, Ministry of Defence. My educational qualification is M.Sc., Ph.D., MBA, PGDEE (Post Graduate Diploma in Ecology and Environment). I have completed 27 years’ of satisfactory service in HEMRL. My entire service record is spotlessly clean.

I hail from a much respected family. My father was a Freedom Fighter and a brave soldier of Azad Hind Sena.

  1. I had submitted timely my grievances to Dr. A Subhananda Rao, Director, HEMRL, Pune regarding my harassment. But no cognizance was taken by him.

I made earnest Appeal for Justice’ on 09.01.2008 to the Director of Personnel (DoP), DRDO, Ministry of Defence, New Delhi regarding my grievances along with supporting documents. I had written a letter on 04.05.2009 to DoP regarding my ‘Harassment by Ostracism’ in HEMRL, Pune. The DoP, too, did not take any cognizance of my grievances and harassment.                          

  1. Instead of considering the gravity of my grievances and harassment by ostracism, Dr. Arun Kumar, the Director of Personnel, all of a sudden, suspended me on 08.2009 by fax order. So, I lodged my protest on 26.08.2009 against the illegal suspension order issued by the DoP.
  1. There is a big conspiracy in DoP office of DRDO from my suspension to dismissal from the service. The Director, HEMRL gave false information to DoP that I was involved in “High-Handed Anti- Departmental Activities”, “the Laboratory has come to a stand still vulnerable position”, “the working of the Laboratory is badly dislocated” and “all officers are in demoralized state”.

The DoP office without any preliminary Inquiry proceeded against me and arranged for my suspension and further dismissal. Thus, the Director HEMRL and DoP joined hands against me and were bent upon to see that I was dismissed from service on 30.12.2010 for the reasons best known to them. The suspension to dismissal charges are not related to each other. Further, penalty of dismissal is horribly disproportionate to the charges leveled against me.

  1. The charges leveled against me for my dismissal like ‘tone and tenor of letter’ are trifling, false and fictitious.
  2. I wish to point out legal points regarding my suspension to dismissal which show that how the Principles of Natural Justice were blatantly violated.
  1. Two separate Memoranda, two separate Disciplinary Inquiries.
  2. Second Inquiry initiated for alleged misconduct during my suspension period when I was not on duty.
  3. Two separate Penalties simultaneously, First Minor & Second Major.
  4. Second penalty was awarded without cancelling first penalty.
  5. No revocation of suspension when first minor penalty was awarded.
  6. Second penalty of Dismissal awarded while under suspension.
  7. Both the penalties horribly disproportionate to the charges.
  8. All the orders from suspension to dismissal illegal. Approval from Rajya Raksha Mantri (RRM) taken instead of Raksha Mantri. Signatory to the orders not authorized under Art.77(2) of the Constitution.          
  1. After dismissal order, I have done a lot of correspondence with the Competent Authority of DRDO for my illegal suspension, illegal punishments including my dismissal and for the settlement of Government dues i.e. rightful amount. But no cognizance was taken by them. This is also the intentionally harassment of me and my family.
  1. I had submitted ‘Appeal for Justice’ to the Competent Authority of the DRDO for my grievances and harassment. But instead of taking any cognizance, suitable action or giving any justice for the same, they have horribly punished me.

It means, ‘Asking for Justice is a Crime’ in DRDO! The Competent Authority of DRDO unnecessarily constrained me to file a various suits in the Hon’ble Courts for the Justice. After the dismissal order, I am jobless. I am highly qualified with 27 years well experienced officer from DRDO but disqualified for any service in the society because of my additional qualification is ‘Dismissal’ which was illegally and unauthorized awarded by the Competent Authority of DRDO. Hence, in all respect, this is very serious harassment and punishment for me.

  1. Sir, I have mentioned all the above irregularities and illegalities, involved in my suspension to dismissal, for your perusal please. I pray and request you to look in to the case and give me justice.

Thanking you,

Yours sincerely,

Place: Pune

Date: 10.12.2014                                                               (Dr. R G Taware)                                                                                                                                                      Pune

Encl.:  Copies of Noting Sheets &Orders   : 13 pages

(Suspension to Dismissal)

Copy to,

Hon’ble Shri. Manohar Parrikar,                                                                                       Defence Minister,Room No. 104,                                                                                                    South Block,New Delhi -110011.

RTI – CVC – DRL, Tezpur, Via PMO

To,                                                                                           Date – 30th March 2015                   Shri H.K. Beniwal,                                                                                                                             Deputy Secretary, CPIO,                                                                                                               Central Vigilance Commission,                                                                                                     Satarkta Bhawan, Block ‘A’,                                                                                                           GPO Complex, INA, New Delhi-110023

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of my complaint against Dr. Vijay Veer , Director, DRL on subject “COMPLAINT AGAINST CORRUPTION IN PROCUREMENT BY DR. VIJAY VEER,DIRECTOR, DRL, TEZPUR” dated 30 September 2014.

  1. The status report of the complaint dated 30 September 2014.
  2. The action taken by CVC on the complaint dated 30 September 2014.

Regards
Prabhu Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur,
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com website www.corruptionindrdo.com

Registration Number            PMOIN/R/2015/60797

Regarding Backdoor Entry of Scientists

To                                                                                               29th March 2105                             Sh Manohar Parrikar,                                                                                                                       Defence Minister,                                                                                                                               Room No 104, South Block,                                                                                                             New Delhi -110011

Subject: Dr A K Gupta, Ex Director, IRDE helped in Backdoor Entry of Scientists in IRDE, DRDO, Dehradun

Sir,                                                                                                                                                               DRDO having unlimited example of manipulations in recruitments of scientists because of RAC. In beginning of 2000  when Dr W Selvamurty managed the post of CC R&D (HR) inspite of life sciences man which is not the core of DRDO. He create all nonsense in HR, promotions/postings/ recruitments are become business in DRDO.

The result was DRDO involved in lot of court cases till date DRDO paying his all mischiefs and his groomed scientists are sitting in various important posts and carrying all manipulations  like Dr A K Singh, DOP and Dr R K Jain, Director, RAC. The chelas of   Dr W Selvamurty squeeze DRDO in all means these adventures were sensed by ex defence minister and recommended CBI inquiry and advice recruitment of scientists  should again given to UPSC.

Sir, in your reply of question No 789 in Loksabha that DRDO having shortage of more than 1200 scientists. It is wrong input supplied by DRDO in each and every lab more than 30% scientists are involved in admin allied work means almost 1800, the best part is that for financial benefits they shows the scientific contribution and it is totally false it can be verified anytime.

Sir, lot of scientists are not having work of their expertise and they are posted only for satisfaction of ego of Directors,DGs, DOP etc.

The following enclosed letter is received by website and forwarding you to investigate the truth behind the inputs.

Regards

Prabhu Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur,                                                                                                                     Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,                                                                                 e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website www.corruptionindrdo.com

Enclosed : Letter received by website www.corruptionindrdo.com irde letter regarding scientists appointmentirde letter regarding scientists appointment1 irde letter regarding scientists appointment2

CONSTITUTION OF FAIR FACT FINDING INQUIRY COMMITTEE IN CASE OF COMPLAINT AGAINST DR. A.K. SINGH, DIRECTOR, Dte of Personnel (DOP), DRDO HQ

To                                                                                                    Date 27th March 2015               Shri R.K. Mathur                                                                                                                             Defence Secretary,Secretary,                                                                                                           Dte Research & Development (Addl. Charge)                                                                             &DGR&D, DRDO, Min. of Defence,                                                                                               Room No 101, South Block                                                                                                               New Delhi-110011

SUBJECT: CONSTITUTION OF FAIR FACT FINDING INQUIRY COMMITTEE IN CASE OF COMPLAINT AGAINST DR. A.K. SINGH, DIRECTOR, Dte of Personnel (DOP), DRDO HQ     

REFERENCE

  1.  Complaint dated 14 Nov 2014 submitted to Hon’ble Defence Minister on the subject “Breach of trust, criminal misconduct and gross violation of CCS (Conduct) Rules 1964 to misguide Hon’ble Defence Minister by Dr. A.K. Singh, Director (Personnel) , DRDO HQ, New Delhi”.
  2. Letter No. DVS/02/2053/P/63 dated 12 Feb 2015 from Dte of Vigilance & Security, DRDO, Min. of Defence, DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg,New Delhi

Sir,

DRDO HQ is expert in constituting Fact Finding Committees in such a way that the first and final agenda is to any mean give the clean chit to allege officiasl. DRDO Hqrs. having a great track record for this.

  1. Sh Avinash Chander gave clean chit to Dr Arun Kumar, Ex DOP for involved in appointment of of his daughter, Dr W Selvamurthy’s daughter, Sh Bansal’s Daughter, Dr G. Elangovan’s wife etc. After intervention of Ex Defence Minister, Dr run Kumar suspended, facing disciplinary proceeding, his daughter Ms Swati & Mrs T Chandra Banu’s service annulled and rest Ms Geetha & Ms Dolly Bansal’s are in queue. The key person helping in this corrupt practice is Dr A K Singh, DOP, DRDO being staff officer of Dr W Selvamurthy the CC R&D (HR)
  2. Dr V Bhujanga Rao then CC R&D (HR) gave clean chit to Dr A K Maini, E Director LESTEC for giving CRS to Sh Praksh Singh, SAO, LASTEC, but what happened Sh Praksh Singh reinstate and Maini is fighting for his pension till date. The key person helping in this corrupt practice is Dr A K Singh, DOP, DRDO.
  3. Sh Avinash Chader made two Fact Finding Committees to find out Dr A K Saxena’s corrupt practices but only GOD or Dr A K Singh knows the truth. Now we are looking High Court Delhi for revealing the facts of Dr A K Saxena’s, Director, DMSRDE, Kanpur. The key person helping in this corrupt practice is Dr A K Singh, DOP, DRDO. Dr A K Singh submitted illegal affidavit to CAT Allahabad & High Court Allahabad to support most corrupt DMSRDE Director.
  4. Maj. Gen Ajay Gupta, Director, Vigilance is under pressure of Dr. A K Singh, DOP, DRDO, Hqrs because of Dr. A K Singh, DOP, DRDO, Hqrs aware all earlier co-operations done by Ajay Gupta with ex SA to RM.

It is requested that please see personally the investigation against Dr. A K Singh, DOP, DRDO, Hqrs. As you also aware that Dr. A K Singh role for harass Dr. Gauasal Khan, Sc D and Dr S Majumadar, Sc G in DIPAS. The reputation of DRDO administration is in the stake because of incompetent DOP, court cases are increasing day by day, officials are suffering sundry things like transfer/posting, SC/ST harassment and minority harassment cases are not dealing properly by DOP. After termination of Sh Avinash Chander Dr A K Singh’s illegal activities are down 50% but still your intervention is requested to give relief to DRDO officials from the panic of Dr A K Singh.

Regards

Prabhu Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur,                                                                                                                     Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,                                                                                 e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website www.corruptionindrdo.com

Parrikar to separate roles of DRDO chief and scientific advisor

Shishir Gupta, Hindustan Times, New Delhi| Updated: Mar 21, 2015 00:53 IST
Defence minister Manohar Parrikar has decided to bifurcate the job of secretary (Defence Research and Development Organisation) and scientific advisor (SA) to the minister with the latter now expected to oversee research and development and push the DRDO to a world class level for military technologies.ht parrikarFormer DRDO secretary Chander, who 11th SA to the Raksha Mantri, demitted office on January 31, 2015. South Block sources said while Parrikar has short-listed a panel of around eight young defence scientists for the DRDO job, he plans to bring in an advisor who will be tasked to advise him on the technological and hardware requirements of the armed forces as well as to help enhance technologies for the DRDO laboratories.

“How can SA to RM and DRDO chief be the same person? The job of the former was to keep an eye on the latter working. This is perhaps why the DRDO has lagged behind in developing world class defence technologies and all its major programmes are behind schedule,” said a senior official.

While Parrikar is currently informally advised by retired military officials on requirements of the armed forces, the 12th SA is expected to review the working of the DRDO and fix accountability and time-lines on development of critical technologies. The next DRDO chief will be one of the defence ministry secretaries with three other secretaries as his colleagues.

With PM Narendra Modi’s Make in India centred around defence technologies, future focus will be on DRDO labs developing exportable technologies for hardware production by defence public sector undertaking and Indian companies in joint venture with global defence contractors.

पीएमओ से शिकायत पर अनुशासन की तलवार

  • आइआरडीई के एक अफसर ने भेजा शिकायतों का पुलिंदा
  • अब निदेशक ने मामले की जांच को कमेटी गठित की

28 जून 2011 को आइआरडीई से सेंट्रल सॉल्वेज डिपो, नई दिल्ली के लिए एल्युमिनियम लेकर पांच ट्रक चले थे। जिसमें से एक ट्रक का करीब 500 किलो एल्युमिनियम गायब मिला था। जांच में भी इसकी पुष्टि हुई थी, लेकिन कोई कार्रवाई नहीं की गई।

 देहरादून की एक फर्म से मानकों को ताक पर रखकर 10 लाख रुपये के फर्नीचर की खरीद। 18 सफाई और रखरखाव के नाम पर कार्मिकों का बेहिसाब ओवरटाइम।

खाली होने के बावजूद तीन साल तक निदेशक आवास अन्य पात्र अधिकारी को आवंटित नहीं किया गया।

शिकायत करना पड़ा महंगा
मुश्किल : पीएमओ को भेजी चिट्ठी में इन मुद्दों का है जिक्र

सुमन सेमवाल, देहरादून डिफेंस रिसर्च एंड डेवलपमेंट ऑर्गेनाइजेशन (डीआरडीओ) के देहरादून स्थित यंत्र अनुसंधान एवं विकास संस्थान (आइआरडीई) के एक अफसर को विभाग के गड़बड़झाले की शिकायत पीएमओ से करना महंगा पड़ गया। विभाग ने शिकायत पर कार्रवाई की बजाए उन पर ही अनुशासन की तलवार लटका दी। हालांकि, इसके बाद हुए पत्रचार को देखते हुए संस्थान के निदेशक ने पूरे मामले की जांच के लिए अब कमेटी गठित कर दी गई। 1किस्सा कुछ इस तरह है, आइआरडीई के टेक्निकल स्टाफ ऑफिसर वीके गोयल ने फरवरी माह में पीएमओ को पत्र लिखकर विभागीय अनियमितताओं की शिकायत की थी। बताया गया कि पीएमओ ने उनके इस पत्र पर संज्ञान लेते हुए संस्थान के निदेशक को कार्रवाई करने को कहा। लेकिन, हुआ इसके उलट। संस्थान के स्तर पर इस अधिकारी को अनुशासनात्मक कार्रवाई की चेतावनी जारी कर दी गई। इस पर शिकायतकर्ता अधिकारी ने ऐतराज जताया तो संस्थान के आला अधिकारियों ने पीएमओ से आई चिठ्ठी पर संज्ञान लिया। अब इस पूरे प्रकरण की जांच के लिए 18 मार्च को वरिष्ठ वैज्ञानिक एके सहाय की अध्यक्षता में कमेटी का गठन कर दिया गया है।

अनियमितताएं पूर्व की हैं। जांच कमेटी बैठा दी गई है। दोषियों के खिलाफ सख्त कार्रवाई की जाएगी। रक्षा संस्थान में किसी भी तरह की अनियमितता बर्दाश्त नहीं की जाएगी। वैसे कार्मिकों को इस तरह पीएमो तक नहीं जाना चाहिए।1डॉ. एसएस नेगी, निदेशक (आइआरडीई)daink jagran 26 march 2015

Manohar Parrikar tells DRDO to focues on core areas; says not to take up new projects

manohar-parrikar-tells-drdo-to-focues-on-core-areas-says-not-to-take-up-new-projects
manohar-parrikar-tells-drdo-to-focues-on-core-areas-says-not-to-take-up-new-projects

By Manu Pubby, ET Bureau | 26 Mar, 2015, 04.52AM IST
NEW DELHI: Most of the military systems it develops face time delays and cost escalation but ironically the one thing that the Defence Research and Development Organisation is considered good at by the armed forces – constructing buildings and executing civil works – is now being taken away.

Sending a clear message to India’s premier defence research agency to focus on its core functions, Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar has instructed that the organisation will no longer undertake civil and maintenance works of other departments, including entities like the Brahmos Missile Company and the Strategic Forces Command besides the three armed forces.

In a terse set of instructions to DRDO headquarters, Parrikar has ordered that the organisation shall no longer undertake any new civil or maintenance works projects with effect from March 12, choking a large portion of its independent revenue stream.

drdo detailsIt is a lesser known facet of the organisation but DRDO has a works department that executes construction projects – from office buildings to missile storage units, launching areas and accommodation – worth over Rs 5,000 crore every year.

Beside projects for armed forces, DRDO has recently constructed the new AICTE headquarters in Delhi.

Section 66(A) Scrapped: Meet Shreya Singhal, Petitioner Who Fought for Net Freedom

Salute to Shreya Singhal – www.corruptionindrdo.com

All India | Edited by Deepshikha Ghosh | Updated: March 24, 2015 14:22 IST

http://www.ndtv.com/video/player/news/section-66-a-scrapped-meet-shreya-singhal-petitioner-who-fought-for-net-freedom/360955?#t=0

http://www.ndtv.com/video/player/news/section-66-a-scrapped-meet-shreya-singhal-petitioner-who-fought-for-net-freedom/360955
NEW DELHI: The end of Section 66A, the controversial law that allowed arrests for offensive content online, marks a big victory for Shreya Singhal, the young law student who was among the first to challenge it in the Supreme Court.

“I am ecstatic. It was grossly offensive to our rights, our freedom of speech and expression and today the Supreme Court has upheld that,” Shreya told NDTV moments after the court scrapped the law, agreeing that it is unconstitutional and violates the rights of citizens.

“Nobody should have fear of putting up something because of the fear of going to prison. The court has upheld the rights of all citizens today,” she added.

Shreya comes from a family of lawyers; her mother is a Supreme Court lawyer and her grandmother was a judge.

She was 21 when she filed a petition in 2012, after two young women were arrested for posting comments critical of the total shutdown in Mumbai after the death of Bal Thackeray, the Shiv Sena chief.

Shreya says her family encouraged her. “I am also a law student so through my studies also I knew that you can approach the Supreme Court directly,” she said, aware that she has achieved, even before becoming a lawyer, what many veterans in the profession haven’t.

She spent three years studying astrophysics in the UK before returning to India to apply to law schools. Her attention was drawn to several high-profile arrests of people under Section 66A.

“It is being misused by BJP governments, Congress governments… all over the country. Even when the Congress was in power, it was being misused. Governments have their own political agenda; a law has to be for the people,” Shreya said.

The court today had strong words in support of that sentiment as it said, “Governments come and go. We can’t act on assurance that Section 66A will not be misused.”

Appeal to clean DRDO of corrupt and anti-national officials