LTC Scam in DRDO Labs

To                                                                                                          
Central Vigilance Commissioner,
Central Vigilance Commission,
Satarkta Bhawan, A- Block, GPO Complex, INA
New Delhi-110023

SUBJECT: LTC Scam in DRDO Labs

The scientists from DRDO are involved in LTC scam

According to DoPT guidelines issued time to time, DRDO officials can avail LTC80 scheme for self and their wards.

Taking the privilege some of the scientists / officials have found out the method to temper normal e-tickets of Air India to LTC80 tickets.

This way the government is paying more and Air India is getting less, the balance amount goes to the pocket of individuals.

Sh G S Malik, Director, DTRL, DRDO received written complaints on 31st December 2013 and 1st January 2014 of this racket which was run by a scientist of DRTL, DRDO, Ministry of Defence.

An inquiry committee was setup and the finding reveals that LTC claim was settled with doctored / tempered Air India E- tickets.

Sh G S Malik, Director, DTRL, DRDO reported immediately  this matter to Director Vigilance, DRDO Hqrs vide letter No DTRL/Dir/Vig_LTC/2014 dated 3rd January 2014 along with evidences. Copy enclosed for ready reference.

The interesting facts is that top DRDO official a CC R&D instructed to Director, Vigilance & Security to rafa/dafa/ buried this case.

DRDO lab loosed their credentials, the morals, the values, ethics and highly place officials of DRDO has gone down to such an extent that the youngsters of DRDO are at the loss.

Honourable Defence Minister has taken strong action against some top officials, who played with constitutional authorities based on the recommendation of CVC & CVO, MoD.

This LTC scam is not only pertain to DRTL but if examined thoroughly more than 100 cases from  will found from Delhi based DRDO Labs.

For your ready reference the sample e- ticket which was booked by one Sc’D’, DTRL using his credit card for Sh Sanjeev Kumar, Sc ‘D’, LASTEC, DRDO. It clearly indicates that scam is not limited to DTRL.

It is requested that the competent authority may please be directed for through investigation in DTRL, LASTEC, DIPAS, INMAS, CEPTAM, SAG, ISSA, SSPL, DIPR, CFEES etc. and CC R&D should not be allowed to jeopardize the investigation.

Regards

24th January 2014

Prabhu Dandriyal                                                                                                                            
21-Sunderwal, Raipur, Dehradun -248008                                                                             
0135-2787750 – 91-9411114879                                                                
prabhudoon@gmail.com,  www.corruptionindrdo.com

Recent News on LTC scam in various News papers.

The CBI filed an FIR against him. Nine MPs have been accused of inflating travel bills to claim expenses they never paid.

CBI is still probing if officials of Shipping Corporation of India, Air India and Ordinance Factory Board (OFB), Jabalpur committed fraud. The agency had registered a preliminary enquiry into the matter in August.

CBI has alleged that senior and mid-level officers in government organisations colluded with private tour operators to take personal trips with families to far-off destinations and then claim the amount spent as official visits.

Enclosed

  1. Letter No DTRL/Dir/Vig_LTC/2014 dated 3rd January 2014
  2. Air India E- Ticket of Sh Sanjeev Kumar, Sc ‘E’, LASTEC, DRDOdtrl ltc scam 2

air ticket 1air ticket2

 

4th DRDO Directors Conclave 23rd & 24th January 2014- Devoted Topic “Change Management”

Vide D.O. No 85101/CCR/Conclave dated 06th December 2013 Lt Gen Anoop Malthora asked Lab & Estt. Directors come with important issues which suppose to address by Corporate Hqrs.

“Change Management” means now last over the period of 20 years maximum incompetent scientists are on the top position in DRDO.

Distinguished / Outstanding Scientists, who are capable to manage service extensions, manage promotions and superseding the honest and devoted scientist with false claims. Sh R C Agarwal, Sh R K Agarwal and  2, 3,………

Distinguished / Outstanding Scientists, who are capable to procure systems / sub-systems in exorbitant price, from Israel, Via Singapore or through their favorite vendor – Dr A K Saxena and 2,3 ………..

Distinguished / Outstanding Scientists, who are capable to manipulate interpret government orders for instant problem solution, who are not bothered later consequences. Dr W. Selvamurthy in Rs 4600 – Rs 4800 and his so many chelas 2,3,

Distinguished / OutstandingScientists, who are the best in fooling DRDO Purchase Management – 2006, again the no 1 is Dr A K Saxena and 2,3 ………..

Distinguished / Outstanding Scientists, who are best in manipulation in recruitment procedure for kiths & kin of senior scientists or their own wards. Dr W . Selvamurthy and his chelas, Sh Rajesh Goyal and 2,3,………

Distinguished / Outstanding Scientists, who are capable to mislead the real queries of Honorable Parliament or MoD Vigilance, PI & 2,3

Distinguished / Outstanding Scientists, who are experts in plagiarism. Dr. M.P Kaushik and 2,3………

Distinguished / Outstanding Scientists, who are best in nurture Corruption, Favoritism, Casteism, harassing the  weaker community – Sh R C Agarwal and Dr M.P Kaushik,2,3, (Sh Jagdish Kumar & Sh B P Shakya case are current example)

Distinguished / Outstanding Scientists, who are manage to get Honorary Doctorates or PhD’s by donating heft funds in name of Grant / CARS project / project development etc from poor tax payer’s money and gets PhD’s in age of 60+ from private deemed universities. numbers increasing day by day and queue is starting from newly born DG’s

Scientist like Dr Parhalda who claimed HRA illegally and whole DRDO machinery is saving him and whoever helped him got return gift.

“Change Management”: definitely helps all those incompetent & selfish scientist of DRDO that DRDO is riding the constitutional provisions since there is no accountability.

Cheers !

With Best wishes

www.corruptionindrdo.com

Complaint to CVC – DMSRDE FUME HOOD PROCUREMENT CASE

To                                                                                                          
Central Vigilance Commissioner,
Central Vigilance Commission,
Satarkta Bhawan, A- Block, GPO Complex, INA
New Delhi-110023
 

SUBJECT: Corruption in procurement of Fume Hoods in DMSRDE Kanpur Officers involved in Procurement

  1. Sh. A.S. Parihar, Scientist ‘D’ – Indenter
  2. Sh. Shielendra Kumar, Scientist ‘E’ Head Estate & Work Division and also MMG division both.
  3. Dr. AK Saxena, Director & CFA
  1. Defence Materials & Stores Research & Development Establishment (DMSRDE), Kanpur is an establishment under Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO), Min. of Defence, DRDO Bhawan, New Delhi.
  2. DRDO’s Director Material Management distributed to all Labs & Establishments a manual named “DRDO Purchase Management -2006” which was duly approved by President of India and with the concurrence of Ministry of Defence (Fin/R&D) vide their ID No 752/IF (R&D) dated 20 March 2006.
  3. “DRDO Purchase Management -2006”  page no 12,  para 4.5.2 stated     Directors of Labs/Estts will observe adequate caution while working out detailed specifications of an intended procurement that these are not tailor made to suit a particular brand of product. Broad coverage of the functional performance and environmental parameters will be spelled out in the specifications to allow competition. For this purpose a computer-based data bank of similar products, along with broad specifications will be maintained and updated frequently so as to facilitate fair competition in purchases.
  4. The following case of procurement of Fume Hoods is totally violated procurement rules laid down by DRDO.
    • Tailor made specification was made and brand name as well as model number mentioned in tender inquiry.
    • Make cannot be mentioned in demand only item can be purchased whichever is having lowest prise. So he can purchase a branded item of particular firm unless it is propitiatory item. Bio base is Chinese Company so how they decided to purchase that brand when several manufactures and brands of Fume Hood were available in the Market
    • Item was purchased by Estate & Works Division, This division cannot indent & purchase Fume hood as this division is only for maintenance of Buildings & Govt accommodation.
    • Purchased qty 14 because the total price comes under fifty lakh which was within the limit of Director’s purchase power. Purchase Rules was violated as case was so designed that cost remain below 50 Lakhs (the Financial Power of Director)
    • Purchased exorbitant price because the same item is available in open market @ 1350 $ and dollar rate of date of supply order (19 November 2013) was Rs 62.26.
    • Open Market cost of  Fume Hood Chamber (Make- Biobase, Shandong Model- FH-1200 C) $1350 X 62.26 ( Dollar Rate on 19 Nov 2013 ) = Rs 84051.00
    • Fume Hood Chamber (Make- Biobase, Shandong Model- FH-1200 C) was purchased @ 290540.00 and Quantity 14 was purchased total amount Rs. 45,76,005.00. (With Tax)
    •  Actual cost of 14 no of Fume Hood Chamber (Make- Biobase, Shandong Model- FH-1200 C) Rs 84051.00 X 14 = Rs. 1176714.00
    •  Purchased exorbitant price by DMSRDE – Rs 290540.00 x 14 = Rs 4067560.00
    •  Total loss of poor tax payers Rs 4067560.00 – Rs. 1176714 = Rs 2890846.00 

FUME HOOD PROCUREMENT CASE

DMSRDE Fume Hood Demands Detailsfume demand   Demand Under worksfume demand under works DMSRDE, Kanpur Tender Details fume tender  DMSRDE, Kanpur placed Supply Order to KAN-THT (INDIA) Pvt. Ltd., Delhi to procure the item  details of which given below.fume supply order 5.   The facts stated above, it is amply crystal clear that prima facie material regarding Abuse of Authority by arrogant and corrupt administrator Dr. A. K. Saxena, Director DMSRDE exists.

6.    In view of the above mentioned facts and evidences it is earnestly requested that an order for through investigation of all procurement done by Dr. Arvind Kumar  Saxena after assuming charge as Director, DMSRDE, DRDO, Kanpur to stop further corruption and wastage of poor tax payers money.

Prabhu Dandriyal                                                                   22 January 2014
21-Sunderwal, Raipur, Dehradun -248008                                                                              
0135-2787750 – 91-9411114879
Email-prabhudoon@gmail.com,  www.corruptionindrdo.com
 

 

Annexure  – 1. Quotation  of  Fume Hood Chamber (Make- Biobase, Shandong Model- FH-1200 C)fume quotation
 

HAPPY BIRTHDAY

18th January

Hope your birthday is totally cool, really fantastic, wonderful, exciting, majorly awesome, rocking and HAPPY.
Happy Birthday wishes.
Free from Corruption, Free from Nepotism, Free from Favoritism
Shri RAKESH KUMAR, ADE,
Ms. MEHAK DHINGRA, ADE,
Shri SRI DURGA MAHESH DONGA, ANURAG
Dr. GADE SV,ARDE,
Shri UDAY CHANDRA PATEL, CABS,
Dr. CHAKRABARTI AMITABHA, DIPAS,
Shri CHETAN K, GTRE,
Shri HIMANSHU SINGH,IRDE,
Dr. PATIL VASANT G, ISSA,
Shri SAHANI SANJAY KUMAR,ITR,
Shri SANTRA MRITYUNJAY, MTRDC,
Shri KUMAR KRISHNA P, NPOL,
Shri KUTTHUMU SRINU, NSTL,
Shri GOLLAPUDI SREEDHAR BABU, RCI,
Dr. SRIVASTAV SANDEEP, SSPL,
Dr. AMARJIT SINGH, TBRL,

RTI- DMSRDE

 To                                                                                  17th January 2014
Central Public Information Officer
DRDO, Ministry of Defence
DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg
Delhi-110054        

Hello,

Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of DMSRDE, Kanpur.

  1. Government of India constituted ‘National Investigation Agency’, (NIA) under ‘NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY ACT, 2008’.  Para 6. (2)Chapter-II of this act states that:
  • Subject to any orders which the Central Government may make in this behalf, officers of the Agency shall have throughout India in relation to the investigation of Scheduled Offences and arrest of persons concerned in such offences, all the powers, duties, privileges and liabilities which police officers have in connection with the investigation of offences committed therein.

2.   Para 6. (4)Chapter-II of this act states that:

  • Where the Central Government is of the opinion that the offence is a Scheduled Offence and it is a fit case to be investigated by the Agency, it shall direct the Agency to investigate the said offence.

3.    The Act clearly states that only Government of India can constitute any enquiry that is detrimental to the security of nation. In case of Ministry of Defence, only and only Defence Minister can refer such cases to ‘National Investigation Agency’, (NIA).

4.     Two separate interviews of Dr. A. K. Saxena, Director DMSRDE at Kanpur, have been published in a local Newspapers, “DANIK JAGRAN, Kanpur” and ‘HINDUSTAN, Kanpur” on 16 January 2014.  The clips of news are enclosed as ‘Annexure-I’ and ‘Annexure-II’. Kindly provide the following information u/s 6(1) of RTI Act 2005.

INFORMATION SOUGHT

  1. Has Dr. A. K. Saxena taken mandatory permission for this press briefing from either Director General (NS &M) or Director of ‘Directorate of Interface’? (YES/NO)?
  2. Please provide the copy of  permission letter from competent authority for briefing the press by Dr. A. K. Saxena, Director, DMSRDE, if any
  3. Please provide the copy of approval of competent authority of DRDO Hqrs for the statement of Dr. A. K. Saxena, Director, DMSRDE given to the news papers.
  4. Has the Minister of Defence referred any such case against some of employees of DMSRDE to NIA? (YES/NO)
  5. If the answer of query 1 is YES, then please provide a copy of such communication.
  6. If the answer of query 1 is NO, then has Dr. A. K. Saxena, Director DMSRDE Director misrepresented the facts in his press briefing to the correspondents of ‘Danik Jagran, Kanpur’ and ‘Hindustan, Kanpur’? (YES/NO)
  7. If the answer to query 3 is YES, please provide the rules and the details thereof that have been broken by Dr. A. K. Saxena.
  8. If the answer of query 4 is YES, then provide a copy of such communication.
  9. If the answer of query 4 is NO, has Dr. A K Saxena breached the rules, regulation and guidelines issued by ‘Directorate of Interface’ (YES/NO)?
  10. Keeping in view, ‘PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, 1988’’, ‘CENTRAL VIGILANCE ACT 2003’, recently passed ‘LOKPAL AND LOKAYUKTAS ACT 2013’ and pending PUBLIC INTEREST DISCLOSURE AND PROTECTION TO PERSONS MAKING THE DISCLOSURE BILL, 2010, Does any communication  on matter of CORRUPTION constitute passing of SECRET/CONFIDENTIAL information (YES/NO)?
  11. If the answer to query 8 is YES, has Dr. A K Saxena made a fictitious and false statement (YES/NO)?
  12. As claimed in the interviews by Dr. A K Saxena, has secret information has been leaked out by some scientists / employees of DMSRDE other than malpractices, subversion of purchase rules in the procurement of stores (YES/NO)?
  13. As claimed in the interviews by Dr. A K Saxena, has he communicated the list of scientists / employees of DMSRDE to Headquarters (YES/NO)?
  14. If the answer to query 11 is YES, please provide the names of these officers and employees.
  15. If the answer to query 8 is YES, please provide the details of secret information
  16. All the ACTS mentioned in Para-7, authorize the Head of an Organization, i.e., Scientific Advisor to Raksha Mantri to take suo-moto cognizance of CORRUPTION ISSUES. Has Scientific Advisor to Raksha Mantri taken suo-moto cognizance of corruption, subversion of DRDO PURCHASE MANUAL 2006 rules and regulation and the malpractices perpetuated  by Dr. A. K. Saxena, Director DMSRDE  (YES/NO)?
  17. If the answer of query 10 is YES, has an enquiry committee been formed to look into massive corruption perpetuated by Dr. A K Saxena in DMSRDE (YES/NO)?
  18. If the answer of query 11 is YES, then please provide the details of such enquiry committee, including chairman and all the members been
  19. If the answer to query 10 is NO, also that DRDO does not take suo-moto cognizance of CORRUPTION till the corrupt officer is caught red handed and arrested by CBI, than please provide the details of the existing mechanism for eradication of CORRUPTION MENACE in DRDO
  20. The information sought is pertaining to Establishment matter and as such not exempted u/s 24 of RTI Act 2005.
  21. This is to inform that Central Information Commission in its various decisions consistently held that establishment matters relating to the organization notified u/s 24 of the RTI Act come within the purview of the Act and information in this regard thereto are not exempted from disclosure.
  22. Besides purchase and establishment matter the information sought is pertaining to allegations of Corruption and as such not exempted u/s 24 of RTI Act 2005.

Registration Number –  MODEF/R/2014/60109

Plagiarism in “CARBON NANOTUBES AND RELATED STRUCTURES”

To                                                                                                           Date 17th January 2014
Sh Avinash Chander
DG, DRDO, Secretary, R&D,
Scientific Adviser to Raksha Mantri
DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg
New Delhi-110105

Sir,

I have found the paper “CARBON NANOTUBES AND RELATED STRUCTURES” Kingsuk Mukhopadhyay, Kanik Ram, K.U. Bhasker Rao published in Defence Science Journal, Vol. 58, No. 4, July 2008, pp. 437-450 but unfortunately, it has been found  the second and third para of page 437 & 438 of this paper has been ditto copied from the paper published in Topics in Applied Physics, USA, Volume 80, 2001, pp 391-425 entitled “Applications of Carbon Nanotubes” by Pulickel M. Ajayan, Otto Z. Zhou.

It is shocking that the Kingsuk Mukhopadhyay author from DMSRDE has even failed to acknowledge the paper ““Applications of Carbon Nanotubes” by Pulickel M. Ajayan, Otto Z. Zhou.

This is the height of the plagiarism. Dr A K Saxena, DMSRDE and Sh Avinash Chander, SA to RM requested to do needful appropriate action to uphold the moral and dignity of DRDO.

Regards

Prabhu Dandriyal
21- Sunderwala, Raipur,
DEHRADUN- 248008, UTTARAKHAND
www.corruptionindrdo.com, prabhu@gmail.com

 

Enclosed –

  1. Copy of paper “CARBON NANOTUBES AND RELATED STRUCTURES” Kingsuk Mukhopadhyay, Kanik Ram, K.U. Bhasker Rao
  2. Copy of paper  “Applications of Carbon Nanotubes” by Pulickel M. Ajayan, Otto Z. Zhoucarbon nano tubes & related structures _kingkush Mukho1carbon nano tubes & related structures _kingkush Mukho2

Copy of paper  “Applications of Carbon Nanotubes” by Pulickel M. Ajayan, Otto Z. Zhouapplication of cnt 1application of cnt 2

HAPPY BIRTHDAY

17th January
Hope your birthday is totally cool, really fantastic, wonderful, exciting, majorly awesome, rocking and HAPPY.
Happy Birthday wishes.
Free from Corruption, Free from Nepotism, Free from Favoritism
Shri SAROJ KUMAR, ADE,
Shri ANKIT GUPTA,DEAL,
Shri NIRMALYA RARHI, DMRL,
Shri RAJESH KUMAR, DRDL,
Shri KATTEPOGU JAYAPRAKASH, GTRE,
Ms. BAJAJ SANDHYA, LASTEC,
Ms. DYANA A, LRDE,
Shri RAJU KB,NSTL,
Ms. VIJAYALAKSHMI NAKKA, RCI,
Shri CHETAN SINGH MEENA, SPIC
DR/Ms GUPTA AMITA, SSPL,
Shri SUMIT JAIN, SSPL,

HAPPY BIRTHDAY

16th January
Hope your birthday is totally cool, really fantastic, wonderful, exciting, majorly awesome, rocking and HAPPY.
Happy Birthday wishes.
Free from Corruption, Free from Nepotism, Free from Favoritism
Shri YALLAPA TARAL S, ARDE,
Shri SAMPATH KUMAR, ASL,
Shri ANEELKUMAR VASANTRAO JOSHI, CABS,
Shri MALLESHA, DFRL,
Shri SUBIR KUMAR ROY,DMRL,
Shri ABHISHEK KUMAR, DRDL,
Shri SHARMA RAJEEV KUMAR,DRDL,
Dr. SIKDAR AK, HEMRL,
Shri SASTRY V,DRDO HQRS,
Shri GHOSH PRANAB, PXE,
Ms. KATHIKA ROY, R&D E,
Shri KRISHNA MENON P, RCI,
Shri HARBANS LAL,SPIC,
Shri SONY SOMAN OOMMEN,SSPL,
Shri RAM KUMAR SHARMA, TBRL,

भ्रष्टाचार छुपाने के लिए बौखलाए ए.के. सक्सेना ने किया मीडिया को गुमराह:-

जो तथ्य मीडिया के सामने रखे गए हैं उसमे इनके पास कोई दस्तावेज़ नहीं है जबकि सम्बंधित वेबसाईट www.drdocorruption.com  पर जो भी भ्रष्टाचार के आरोप लगाए गए हैं वो सभी तथ्यों व दस्तावेजों पर आधारित हैं|    

FRONT PAGE AMAR UJALA(KANPUR) DATED 22.08.2012
FRONT PAGE AMAR UJALA(KANPUR) DATED 22.08.2012

hidustan3

Appeal to clean DRDO of corrupt and anti-national officials