Tag Archives: DRDO

Drdo

SFCIANS, SF COMPLEX, DRDO, JAGDALPUR – DOP, DRDO IS DEAF & DUMB

2 Comments

13th September 2011

SFCIANS, SF COMPLEX, DRDO, JAGDALPUR – DOP, DRDO IS DEAF & DUMB

The reply of my RTI related to SFCian issue was denied by DRDO Hqrs under the shelter of Schedule- II of RTI Act 2005.

As per section 19 of RTI Act 2005 I have appealed to DRDO Hqrs appellate authority and as you very well know that he is deaf & dumb for humanity issues and only act fast on personal issues  in which he has some personal interest. So reply is known but we will take this issue up to supreme authorities.

Hope for best……………………

My RTI Request –

To                                                                                                      19 September 2011                                                 
CPIO & Addl Director, DRDO HQ
Room No. 314A
DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg
New Delhi – 110105

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the  Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect SF Complex, JAGDALPUR

1)            The official address of SF Complex (one of the labs/Establishment of DRDO), JAGDALPUR?

2)            Copy of D O part order or any other order regarding the place of reporting duty at Plant Girola Village which is 40 Kms away from Jagdalpur.

3)            Copy of   D O part order any other order in which the employees posted at SF complex first they report to duty at SF Complex then report for duty at Girola Plant Site.

4)            The copies of movement order of transports which carries the employees daily to Girola plant site from SF Complex from 1/7/2011 to 15/07/2011

5)            The copy of fitness certificates of those vehicles which carries the employees daily to Girola plant site from SF Complex from competent authority.

Find the application fee for the request attached with this application. If you feel that above requested information does not pertain to your department then please follow the provisions of Section 6(3) of the RTI Act, 2005/Also as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 please provide the details (Name and Designation) of the first appellate authority w.r.t to your department with the reply to the above request., where I may if required file my first appeal.
I do hereby declare that I am a citizen of India. Kindly provide me with the information at the address mentioned with the application. I request you to ensure that the information is provided before the expiry of the 30 day period after you have received the application.

Note: above required information is directly related to corruption and human right not come under schedule -II – why because it is noticed that without proper movement orders and without proper maintained vehicles the employees of SF complex are going daily at Girola plant. Earlier in one accident case it is heard that the movement order was made by SF Complex administration in back date to give financial benefits to the deceased family.

Enclosed- Rs 10 Postal order  90E611227

Regards,

 

Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008
Phone – 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
E-mail id prabhu@dandriyal.com, prabhudoon@gmail.com

CPIO, DRDO’s Denial

CPIO, DRDO’s Denial

First Appeal to Appellate Authority of DRDO  12th September 2011

 The Right to Information Act, 2005

First Appeal for Central Govt.

I.D. No_________ Date: _________ [For office use]

To                                                                                                                   

Dr Arun Kumar
OS & Director, Directorate of Personal
Room No.-217, DRDO Bhawan , Rajaji Marg
New Delhi – 110105

Sir,
As I am aggrieved by decision/no decision of Central Public Information Officer, I hereby file this appeal for your kind decision.

The reply of CPIO, DRDO, is completely confusing, misleading, incorrect, unjustified and willful not give any information, does not following the spirit of RTI Act 2005.

The information asked about SF Complex Jagdalpur is not come any norms of secrecy. I am not asking about any work or project information of SF Jagdalpur Unit.
1. Details of appellant
1.1       Full Name:                  Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
1.2.      Full Address:               21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008
1.3       Phone/Cell No.            0135-2787750 / 919411114879
1.4       Email ID:                     prabhu@dandriyal.com

2. Details of CPIO:
2.1 Name/Designation:           Dr A K Tyagi, CPIO, Head RTI Cell, Scientist ‘F’
2.2 Full Address :                    Room No 314 A, DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg, New Delhi -110105
2.3 Name of Public Authority: DRDO, Ministry of Defence, Government of India

3. Details of RTI application to CPIO:
Date of Application  : 19th July  2011
Mailed on:   19th July  2011
by  speed post

4. Particulars of payment of filing fee:
Paid Rs.10/- by   Postal Order No. 90E 611227

5. Details of information sought:

1)      The official address of SF Complex (one of the labs/Establishment of DRDO), JAGDALPUR?

2)       Copy of D O part order or any other order regarding the place of reporting duty at Plant Girola Village which is 40 Kms away from Jagdalpur.

3)            Copy of   D O part order any other order in which the employees posted at SF complex

first they report to duty at SF Complex then report for duty at Girola Plant Site.

4)      The copies of movement order of transports which carries the employees daily to Girola plant site from SF Complex from 1/7/2011 to 15/07/2011

5)    The copy of fitness certificates of those vehicles which carries the employees daily to Girola plant site from SF Complex from competent authority.

Note: above required information is directly related to corruption and human right not come under schedule -II – why because it is noticed that without proper movement orders and without proper maintained vehicles the employees of SF complex are going daily at Girola plant. Earlier in one accident case it is heard that the movement order was made by SF Complex administration in back date to give financial benefits to the deceased family.

6. Particulars of Decision of CPIO:

Date of CPIO’s  Decision:9th August 2011

Date of receipt of decision by the appellant:12th August 2011

7. Brief facts of the case: 

The official address of SF Complex is “SF COMPLEX, AIRPORT TERMINAL BUILDING, JAGDALPUR-494001”. SFC Employees are given appointment letters with above address as reporting place. But, all are forced to report at the above address as well as at its work centre located at Girola village, Bakawand block, Bastar district. This location is completely out of 40 Kms away from municipality (Jagdalpur) of the official address.

As per rule they should report at the place of posting as per the appointment letter. But it is not so. Is it (forcing to report at other place) not violation of an employee’s right to report at the posting place? The management says that reporting place is at Girola and same time management says Airport terminal building, Jagdalpur. It is clear cut case of harassment of employees of SF Complex.

One example: one of the scientists, named Shri Kushal Sahoo, was killed in an accident near Bakawand last year while returning from the Girola site to Jagdalpur in Bolero vehicle. Bakawand police station filed FIR and accident report (can refer the same with the police station). When settling the case the DRDO HQs asked the official movement order to consider it as death while performing duty. As the movement order was not issued actually for him and few more travelling in the same vehicle they were also injured, management of SF Complex made a statement of case stating that “Kusahl Sahoo is travelling for the purpose of meeting at Airport Terminal Building, Jagdalpur office”.

If the travelling from Jagdalpur to Girola and back is official and as per the rule and the rule position should be clear for all for management, employees and the general public. After this accident all the staff of SF Complex Jagdalpur took a decision and reported at posting place only. This happened for two days and later management has interfered and threatened to them for report at Girola and told them if they will not report at Girola, will get termination letter.  Employees were forced to report at Girola. It is a violation of Human Right? Reporting at posting place is not correct? Then why appointment letters were given like that?  DRDO has to duty to provide them proper necessary papers as per rule position of Central Government.

The requested information is not come under 8(1) (a) and 24 (1) of the RTI Act at all because the information asked not in the nature of secrecy like The copy of fitness certificates of those vehicles which carries the employees daily to Girola plant site from SF Complex from competent authority. This the major concern of family and friends of employees of SF complex for their safety and well beings. For mere few thousand Rupees from contractors as bribe the Top DRDO officials playing with the life of SF Complex Employees.

The required information is fall under corruption and as well as violation human right and therefore in any means it is not come under schedule –II exemption of RTI Act 2005.

“RTI is a key instrument for imposing democratic values, accountability and transparency in our public administration,” Dr.Shah Faisal (IAS topper 2010 & RTI activist of J&K RTI Movement NGO) told Sakàl Times

8. Reasons/grounds for this appeal:
i)     To know the sensitiveness and work environment of DRDO
  ii)     To expose the corrupt practices prevailing in DRDO

9. Any other information in support of appeal: 
10. Prayer/relief sought for: 

It is requested that please provide me correct information as per request of my RTI dated 19th   July 2011   in larger public interest, because it is directly related to corruption and violation of Human rights.
11. Enclosures: 

i)              My RTI request dated  19th July 2011   
ii)              Denial of CPIO, DRDO Hqrs dated 09 August 2011
 
12. Declaration:

I hereby state that the information and particulars given above are true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I also declare that this matter is not previously filed with any information commission nor is pending with any Court or tribunal or authority.

Regards

Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008
Phone – 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhu@dandriyal.com website www.corruptionindrdo.com
Drdo

Rajat’s Comment

1 Comment

Rajat Submitted on 2011/08/20 at 7:56 am

Thank you for your all efforts you have put and we all hope that you will keep going like this. Its very well known that higher officials of DRDO are not as they appears but its not good to criticize every scientist, still there are lot of scientist who might be struggling against the system , there must be good dedicated higher officials who are working hard enough for results. Everyone must also read the story of LCA development, how many hours daily they have worked, their sacrifices and what they are getting in return, peanuts. Though this doesn’t justify the corruption in any way and corruption must be eradicated. Like LCA there are many other achievements of DRDO which cant be overlooked and were almost very difficult to achieve. But everything starts from HR policy of DRDO, HR Management of DRDO which need to changed on priority. Everything starts from the promotion policy since the intention with which performance bound performance system was introduced is not being served and senior use it as a weapon to harass junior employee and scientists. It has more side effects than effects, many scientists are here who are working hard but when it comes to promotion either not are given call or they are not able to get through interview for promotion, but it has nothing to do with their talent because they are victim of wrong management. Headquarter tries to settle things properly but at laboratory level everything is changed as per their will so that juniors wouldn’t dare against them or if they , wont get succeed in future after all who can challenge interview process(no recording). If its corrected more corruption matter will come into light , system will be more transparent and competent. Who knows better than you , being a victim you can sense more precisely and clearly everything. Every year there must be recording of interview and there shouldn’t be any known members or representative of laboratory, they motives can be served with instruction to interview panel. Or frustration will keep heaping until it burst. In many laboratory Canteen items are sold to non eligible private workers, isn’t cheating with Govt. Relation of employees with each other is also reflection of favoritism. Junior employees can be seen insulting senior as they are favorites of higher scientist or Director, Admin officer and their behavior with other employees or staff there are countless examples which need to be stated, a lot of changes are required but with your start it seems possible but i personally feel sometimes you are driven with personal emotions and that makes your efforts less effective.
Among all the available cases you certainly will find few selected persons in all the laboratory and their selected one indulge in it but whole system cant be blamed.
As far as North Korea is concerned its also well known that it is supported by China and pakistan. Pakistan exchanged nuclear technology with North Korea in exchange with missile technology while China is looking for bigger cause , its international politics. But in any way India is not inferior to North Korea , its ridiculous statement, by saying so you are insulting countless nights scientist are staff have spent working extra for country, you are underestimating efforts put for achieving higher goals country have set. At what time western countries started their efforts for defense technology and when did we start speaks of untiring will of our scientists whether ISRO, or DRDO. These technologies are not freely available in market, you may have money but no will sell you. Everything has to be start with scratches so its my request to you consider it also while commenting. Your intentions are sacred but sometime coming off differently and such deviations can be overlooked. We should take care of not giving wrong impression of our scientists because respect and dignity is something which is asked in returns otherwise nobody mention ever HOW MANY IIT’ian OR OTHER ELITE SCHOLARS ARE SERVING DIRECTLY OUR COUNTRY, EVERYONE KNOW , EVERYONE TRIES TO GO ABROAD, SETTLE THEIR OR WORKING WITH MNC FOR HIGHER SALARIES , AND BURDEN OF EXPECTATION IS ALWAYS ON DRDO, ISRO, OTHER SCIENTIFIC ORGANIZATION. SALARIES OF OTHER PERSONS WORKING ON SAME TECHNOLOGY OUR SCIENTISTS ARE WORKING IS MANY FOLD HIGHER.

Dear Rajat

Thank you for your sincere and fruitful comment. In fact this topic should be debated that “A establishment which got birth in 1958 and witnessed the successive war of 1962, 1965, 1971 and 1999 Kargil War. Why became so insensitive to the national defence.”

Just after Kargil War when media questioned the Chairman ISRO for the failure in electronic surveillance, the quick reply from Dr Kasturiragan was  ISRO is not responsible for our border surveillance, DRDO is actively engaged with defence activities, they can better reply on this issue. When same question was asked to Scientific Adviser to RM he said that for surveillance of border we need a military satellite.

Rajat you asked yourself after 64 years of independence and lakhs of crores  of investment on ISRO & DRDO the 120 crores people has to hear such statement, shame on us.

Even if we had taken up a firm decision after 1999 Kargil War probably India would have moved ahead in border surveillance by now.

Recently on discovery channel the details of the planning of attack at Abbottabad , Pakistan was revealed by American Mariners.  A team of US navy seals was selected in 2001 just after OSAMA BIN LADEN survived from missile attack in Sudan on 20th August 1998.

The team was authorized to use any resources but as top   secret mission. They have to develop

(i)                  A Stealth Helicopter
(ii)                Sound proofing of engine
(iii)               Only thermal sensing while move
(iv)              To assess lip movement behind the wall
(v)                Count the member through thermal sensing behind the fore wall & many more gadgets for self protection.

Dear Rajat the world saw that in 10 years time the dedicated man power were able to identified the target and accomplish the task and the complete   operation was shown live in White House.

Such scientific venture needs

(i)                  Accountability (Self)
(ii)                Dedication
(iii)               Honor the commitments
(iv)              Resource mobilizations

These four points are completely missing in DRDO. The talent is available in plenty in DRDO but in top brasses the vision totally detours, they are engaged in minting money in all means. The extension business, procurement routing via their near & dears, discourage those scientist who want to contribute on project indigenous means. I have ton of tons informations on DRDO today’s scenario, the intelligence agencies, enforcement agencies, bureaucrats are helpless to control these intellectual mafias, because they easily fool the politicians. They draw a rosy picture in front of defence committees and every time they use different arrows to justify the failures.

Now days DRDO’s for their exorbitant expenditure for any infrastructure justifies comment is due to “denial regimes”

In DRDO directors is like  and protected by unforeseen forces from the top. The square root is like protection. A director bluntly says that occupying this chair is something different then possessing mere degree.

The fresh IIT products are reporting to ITI/Diploma with fake IETE (unrecognized distance education centers) / IETE graduates scientists. The difference in these scientists that IIT’ ians never compete them in assessment (because in DRDO assessment system the degree and scientific work is negligible, if you took any list of DRDO/DRTC assessment you will find the success rate of those scientists who are engaged in sundry work like administration, security, MTO, Store procurement and other non scientific work) are higher than those who are working in projects/ programs. Therefore they crushed the knowledge and ruin the scope of scientific development.

Yes there are many honest and qualified scientist but they have compromise with present scenario of DRDO.

A debate on this subject is requested from the reader

Thanking you

Regards
       
Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008
Phone – 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
E-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com,  prabhu@dandriyal.com Website – www.corruptionindrdo.com
Drdo

RAC, DRDO – Favoritism, Nepotism, Corruption

8 Comments

To                                                                                                                30th August 2011
The Defence Minister
Room No -104, South Block
New Delhi – 110011

Honorable Sir,

Promotion of Sh R K Jain, Director, RAC, I have earlier informed you the neck deep nepotism flourishing in RAC, DRDO after Dr P S Goel took the charge of Chairman, RAC. The  cut paste technology of RAC Chairman has helped Sh R K jain to claim 50 publications without the references of Journals year of publication, Page Nos etc.

It has been confirm by RAC that out of 50 publications claimed by Sh R K Jain, 37 Publications are technical reports and 10 was abstracts presented in symposia /seminars. The ugly part of these publications, Chairman RAC Dr P S Goel recommended Sh R K Jain “Scientist of the Year” award

What is happening in DRDO, Please order an inquiry, enclosed   representation is received by www.corruptionindrdo.com on 29th August 2011

Thanking you

 Regards
 
Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008
Phone – 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
E-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com,  prabhu@dandriyal.com Website – www.corruptionindrdo.com            

Letter received by ordinary post 29th August 2011

To
Dr AK Anthony                                   Dr VK Saraswat
Defence Minister                                 SA to RM
South Block                                         DRDO Bhawan
New Delhi                                            New Delhi

Ref— DRDO News Letter-August 2009— Promotion to Bluff Master in “outstanding” category

Dear Sir(s),

Please notice the Resume of Shri RK Jain, Director RAC for promotion from Sc ‘F’ to Sc ‘G’ in ‘outstanding’ category published in DRDO Newsletter- August 2009 – enclosed

flag A Back ground- not the work in the scale of Sc ‘F

flag B Got promotion for installing CCTV. Is it a scientific work? CCTVs are installed in shops, malls, poles, on roads, airports, railway stations, schools, colleges, private offices, PSUs, banks, ministries, homes, community centers.

Is it a work worth even mentioning?

Installing Videoconferencing- Even non scientific organisations are using this technology. Is it a scientific work? Is it research work?

flag C  “responsible for 50 publications which include 37 technical reports, chapters in 5 b09ks, monographs and published/presented more th_an 10 papers”

The sentence itself is meaningless, Publications do not include technical reports

50 publications include 10 publications/presentations? What does this mean?

How many publications shri Jain has?

How many presentations has he given?

Where has he ever presented any paper?

What are these five books?

With Internet search, not a single publication is visible.

flag D  Misleading- was scientist of the year award in 2006 given for work done 1995? This is not the work done in the scale of Sc ‘F’ and should not have been mentioned at all

­

This indicates that DRDO promotions have nothing to do with work. The higher ups decide whom to promote No matter what is the work of the scientist or wI1at he writes in his resume – without verifying CCs approves it and the committee is asked to pass it.

Does the work worth giving promotion in ‘outstanding’ category.

Was the promotion given to Sh RK Jain, Director RAC for manipulations in recruitments and assessments??

Minister Sir is requested to verify the truth of this resume

Sh RK Jain's Citations
Drdo

www.corruptionindrdo.com was hacked and deleted on 12.30 Hrs 25 August 2011

2 Comments

25th August 2011

Dear Dr Saraswat Ji Good Morning                      

Congratulations to you for biggest event of DRDO that is “Demonstration of Technology” to fight Cyber Area.

As my website was not engaged in any anti- national activities, I was simply fighting against corruption prevailing in DRDO. Hacking of website for technology demonstration by DRDO corrupt official with the help of their friends & relatives who are scared by exposes is not a worth Idea. Even then as a bonafide and disciplined ex- soldier of DRDO, I appreciate the team effort in the area where IT information are to be preserve for national Interest.

For your benefit I will mention here that DRDO with 30000 strong technical work force and more than 1 lakh crores infrastructure always talked about big things like bringing moon on earth, but due to lack of accountability at top level the commitment were fizzled out and as result all our mission mode projects were remain on paper and simply act as Technology Demonstrations. In some cases we demonstrated the technology by importing the import substitute, but it did not convinced the users.

1999 Kargil War, the DRDO contribution was NIL to address the services requirements. As

The Bulletproof jacket which killed Sh Hemant Karkare in 26/11 Mumbai attack was tested by DRDO scientist.( had there been an accountability, the officer might have acted in national interest and would have rejected the jacke, approved by taking bribe)

All though DRDO consume nearly 10% of defence budget annually but your officers  and administrative machinery behave as if they are independent and autonomous body and not answerable to anyone.

The public mood however, does not accept the rules and provisions of CCS. Public demands accountability and prepare yourself to explain to the nation, how DRDO has consuming a huge amount without delivering the single pin.

Annually distributions of awards to those who do not deserve, you spend the money because it has to be spent. Under CARS program you sanctioned projects to those universities where you have friends as lectures/ owners hardly you bother to co-ordinate educational institute – R&D-Industries participation for the total development of the economy, the backbone of the country.

Friends are called as experts, friends are called as peer review committee members, friends are called for harass to sincere scientists who are not ready for compromise for vested interest and encourage those who just wag their tails.

In 50 years period, today is the day of biggest achievement of DRDO  brasses, since the website www.corruptionindrdo.com was hacked. If this hacking was possible with external help like Singapore, USA then sorry to say you does not deserve my congratulations.

Thanking you

Regards

Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun 248008
Phone – 0135-2787750, Mobile,  9411114879
E-mail id  prabhu@dandriyal.com   , prabhudoon@gmail.com Website www.corruptionindrdo.com/

 

Drdo

DRDO’s Extension Counter- for DRDO’s Top Corrupt Officials

4 Comments
To                                                                                                                    22th August 2011 
The Honorable Prime Minister
PMO, South Block
New Delhi -110011

Subject: Grant of Extension of service of Scientists beyond the age of superannuation

Honorable Sir,                                                                                                                                                                Department of Personnel and Training O M No.26012/8/2011-Estt. (A) Dated the 16th May, 2011 stats that the laid down criteria for extension of service to the scientist should be in term of proviso to

i)        FR 56 (d)

ii)      Departmental Peer Review Committee (DPRCs) headed by the Secretary of the Scientific  Departments are constituted by the DOP&T with the approval of Prime Minister for a term of  2 years to consider the cases of extension of service of scientists beyond 60 years and up to                    62 years.

iii)    Extension of service of eminent scientists of international stature

iv)    Indicate whether this will block promotion opportunities of others in the Department

v)      Will be processed further for approval of ACC through the office of the Establishment Officer

Sir, the above guidelines thoroughly overruled by DRDO establishment. When Dr APJ Kalam was granted extension of service he had the expertise and international recognition in his field (Missile Technology). Dr M Natrajan was granted extension on the basis of his work in MBT (Arjun Tank). Dr U R Rao, ISRO got extension because of his contribution in space technology.

DRDO, once Dr V K Atre became, SA to RM overruled the guidelines of DoPT provisions for extension. A new culture was established that is those scientists who were close to Dr Atre they were recommended for extension without justifying  their contributions to science & technology. Afterwards the secretary of DRDO used this tool for those who are expert in misappropriation and manipulation of Government funds and misinterpretation of Government rules to their personal benefits.

These scientists nowhere stand as per guidelines of FR 56 (d) and you will find most of cases the scientists are involved totally in administrative job for years. Interestingly Secretary DRDO removed the required paras of Annexure FR 56 (d) where it states the justification why his service is needed and the details of contributions are thoroughly overruled.

Surprisingly, no one pointed these corrupt practices in the process of granting extension. Some applications which I have received by RTI from DoPT are enclosed for your ready reference. Which are the self explanatory, under the name of Defence research and under the shadow of official Secret Act 1923 and the bonafide possession of CCS Rules 1965 they have be-fooled the DoPT,PMO,ACC etc.

DRDO at an interval of every three months gives extension to at least 10-12 scientists, out of which not a single scientist deserve the recommendation as per guide lines of DoPT O M No.26012/8/2011-Estt. (A) Dated the 16th May, 2011 Normally DRDO Hqrs recommend extension to the (Service Provider) like Sh T Mohan Rao, Ex Director, GTRE (Massage Parlour Fame), DRDO recommend Dr S K Vasudeva of SPIC even beyond 64 years of age as he arranged the all cocktails parties + in 5* with help of CS Constructions etc and provide Mrs Kanimozhi‘s methods routing money through her daughter’s firm M/S M V- Grfix as IB already reported to PMO.

DRDO recommends the name of scientists/Directors who manage the misappropriation of funds of projects/ programs. As an example the case of Sh R C Aggarwal, Director, DEAL, Dehradun and Sh Iqbal Singh of IRDE, Dehradun Sh R C Aggarwal joined as Charge-man and become Director, DEAL as Scientist ‘G’ in 2007.

He has no international publications,
No patents,
No significant contribution in any projects at LRDE, NPOL, DLRL and DEAL where he was posted earlier

As a director he wrote an essay (cut paste copy technology) on Software Defined Radio and prepared a proposal for sanction having 60 sub contracts paras. This proposal opened up an avenue to distribute poor tax payer’s money. Rs 100 Crores sanctioned for SDR project and with few months he was promoted as Scientist ‘H’ and also got extension for two years and waiting Scientist for Director’s post Sh K N Rao of DEAL died with shock (Heart Attack).

Sh R C Aggarwal’s extension was  recommended by Dr Arun Kumar, DOP, DRDO who was Scientist ‘E’ in 2001 when Sh R C Aggarwal was Scientist ‘F’. The DPRC which recommended Sh R C Aggarwal had a external member Dr P S Goel, Charman, RAC, whose contribution in ISRO as scientist is big zero, No international publications, No patents, only cut copy paste technology expertise.

Sh R C Aggarwal spent Rs 10 Lakh on TA/DA per year so he is able to contribute Rs 1.25 Lakhs per month in GPF account. As he is using Red beacon on his vehicle drawing Transport allowance using official driver in private car for fooling department.

Sh R C Aggarwal very bluntly says “the development of SDR will take 20 years time” and the PDC of SDR is 36 months.

Dr S C Jain who is enjoying extension but in the same time did not get the promotion to Scientist ‘H’, when he was not fit for promotion then how come he was recommended for extension in service, it can only happened in DRDO.

He has no international publications,
No patents,
No significant contribution in any projects at DEAL

But he is master in manipulation of government funds and misinterpretation of government rules in the interest of his boss. The reason he was benefited, was to get extension and job for his son who has fake qualification.

Sh Iqbal Singh Scientist ‘H’, IRDE, Dehradun got extension without justification of his scientific contribution.

He has no international publications,
No patents,
No significant contribution in any projects at IRDE

Only significant contribution is misappropriation of government funds, he gave orders to a firm where his son works

Dr S S Sundaram, Director, IRDE, Distinguished Scientist got extension for his golden achievement in project SAMYUKTA (Electronic Warfare),  it is well known that Project SAMYUKTA started with Rs 250 Crores initial cost in May 1994 and when buried   unceremoniously in 2006 it consumed Rs 6000 Crores of poor tax payer’s money.

Dr Arun Kumar, DOP, DRDO never did science and there is no question of scientific contribution. He is master in manipulation the governments rules and extend the path of favoritism to benefit DRDO’s top brasses wards. Appointment of his own daughter as scientist ‘B’ by violating all recruitment rules of DRDO. The enquiry is going on without any result like DRDO projects because the chairman of enquiry Dr Salwan, Ex DRDO scientist got Rs 80 Lakhs project with Rs 1 Lakh/month salary from Dr Arun Kumar itself.

The Honorable Prime Minister is requested to stop this criminal act of DRDO’s extension business, which they are recommending without justification. Please go through the recommended applications of DRDO scientists which I have received from DoPT through RTI.

Sir, this is the major reason of brain drain in DRDO because I am receiving lot of mails of ex DRDO young scientists from all over the world in my website www.corruptionindrdo.com, they share their experiences in this pathetic condition of DRDO.

Thanking you

Regards
 
 Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008
Phone – 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
E-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com,  prabhu@dandriyal.com
Website –  www.corruptionindrdo.com

Enclosed:

  1.   Extension applications of DRDO scientists
  2.  FR 56 (d) annexure for comparison the truth 

 Copy to.

  1. Defence Minister, Room No 104- South Block, New Delhi- 110011
  2.  Shri Shashi Kant Sharma, Defence Secretary, Room !01- South Block, New Delhi – 110011
  3.  Ms. Alka Sirohi,  Secretary (Personnel), Room No 112, North Block-110011
  4.  Dr V K Saraswat, D G (R&D), DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg, New Delhi=110105
    FR 56 (d) comparison
    No.26012/8/2011-Estt. (A)
    Government of India
    Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions
    (Department of Personnel and Training)
    North Block, New Delhi,
    Dated the 16th May, 2011

    OFFICE MEMORANDUM

    Subject:  Grant of Extension of service of Scientists beyond the age of superannuation – Issue of instructions regarding.

    The undersigned is directed to refer to Department of Personnel & Taining O.M. No.26012/6/2002-Estt.(A) dated 9.12.2002 (copy enclosed) on the subject mentioned above laying down the criteria for considering cases of extension of service of Scientists in terms of proviso to FR 56(d) and to state that the guidelines for extension of service of eminent scientists of international stature beyond 62 years have been further reviewed as a need has been felt for a rigorous Peer group screening by an inter disciplinary Committee of experts.

    2.   Departmental Peer Review Committee (DPRCs) headed by the Secretary of the Scientific Departments are constituted by the DOP&T with the approval of Prime Minister for a term of 2 years to consider the cases of extension of service of scientists beyond 60 years and up to 62 years.

    3.   It has now been decided with the approval of Prime Minister that the existing/reconstituted Departmental Peer Review Committee shall also do the first stage screening of Scientists for their extension beyond 62 years of age and thereafter the DPRCs’ recommendations will be placed before the Committee under the Cabinet Secretary provided that the DPRCs’ have at least two outside experts apart from Secretary (Personnel & Training). The DPRCs must give detailed justification for such extension based on merits of the case; the international stature of the person recommended and also indicates whether this will block promotion opportunities of others in the Department. Such recommendations of the DPRCs for extension of service of Scientists beyond 62 years will be sent of the Establishment Division of the Department of Personnel & Training for placing the cases before the Committee under Cabinet Secretary. Only such cases recommended by the Committee under Cabinet Secretary will be processed further for approval of ACC through the office of the Establishment Officer. Cases of extension of service of Scientists beyond 60 years and up to 62 years recommended by DPRC will continue to be sent directly to the office of Establishment Officer in DOP&T as at present.

    4.   All proposals for extension of service of Scientists beyond 62 years in terms of the 3rd proviso to FR 56(d) may, therefore, be processed keeping in view the above guidelines in addition to the criteria stipulated in the OM dated 9.12.2010.

    (P.Prabhakaran)
    Director (E)
  5. DoPT RTI reply
    DoPT Reply for Sh R C Aggarwal Page 1
    DoPT Reply for Sh R C Aggarwal page 2
    DoPT Reply For Sh R C Aggarwal page 3
    DoPT Reply for Sh Iqbal Singh page 1
    DoPT Reply for Sh Iqbal Singh Page 2

    DoPT Reply for Sh Iqbal Singh page 3
Drdo

Patriotism of a Technocrat

Leave a comment

To                                                                                                                   18th August 2011
The Defence Minister
Room No -104, South Block
New Delhi – 110011

Reference: a)  Your letter No 1409-VIP/RM/2011 dated 21st March 2011

                       b)  Your letter No 1409-VIP/RM/2236 dated 20th May 2011

Honorable Sir,                                                                                                                                The mood of country man from village to industry, to Government agency has taken in    one line- fight against corruption.

The patriotism has come out and the nuisance mongers are still denying the facts. They have no courage to face the real scenario. In DRDO a practice has been followed for a quite some time that DRDO must have a big programs without the feasibility study and without the realizing the strength and weakness. A 100 crores was sanctioned to DEAL, Dehradun to develop Software Defined Radio (SDR), but the truth behind the green room is the laboratory has not developed a single frequency radio on its own and when they are talking to develop SDR it appears a big crime.

The knowledgeable team with in the country who has knowledge about radio they have not contacted prior to conceive the proposal of “SDR”. One such reaction of a patriot and technocrat is enclosed.

This reaction is result of the open tender floated by DEAL, Dehradun’ SDR’s team. Tender: DEAL/206/4043/2011-2012/D100/074 Dated: 09, Aug 2011, Opening Date: 27, Sep 2011 tender for Development of SCA Core Framework.

The expert feels that specification have been laid down by a person who does not know a bit of radio.

The file has initiated with the estimated cost of Rs 6 Crores with a delivery period as mentioned in tender is not later than 82 weeks from the date of signing of contract. It is interesting to note that the PDC of SDR project is July 2013 and this assignment of  Development of SCA Core Framework definitely going to cross the PDC limit of the SDR.

The sources said that the estimated cost is exorbitantly high and Malafide intension and misappropriation of government money is clearly visible. The tender directly or indirectly will go to hand of   M/s Spectrum Signal Processing BC Canada

This is for the information of ugly act of Sh R C Aggarwal, Director, (extension) DEAL, Dehradun.

Note – This 100 Crores project encourage him to increase GPF subscription upto 1.25 Lakh per month, hope this input will compel you to think twice for DRDO corrupt bosses.   

Thanking you

Regards
Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008
Phone – 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
E-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com,  prabhu@dandriyal.com 
Website – www.corruptionindrdo.com

Enclose – E-mail of a Technocrat regarding SDR Project

Dear sir,                                                                                                                                                I have gone to yr site. It is really interesting to see how these govt departments are working for the benefit of our beloved country. See  I have enclosed one tender fr one of labs of drdo . I hav had a bitter experience with them in the past. They do not know anything but pretend that they r all experts. This tender documents clearly shows that they r not only trying to get a partner for developing their project and that too at their own interest. They do not know a bit about radios forget software radios. How goverment has sanctioned them this project when there under-statement in the tender clearly shows that they hardly know the software architecture of the their would-be-radio.yet They r all set to review the work of tenderer. They will try to get it done for themselves and yet not share the IPR and Copyrights. Finally they will get it procured from somewhere and put their stickers on it and claim that it is theirs.  I have come to know from our principals in US they (MOD) have already STUCK A DEAL with a Company for supply of items for three service and the project is only to fill the gaps. The persons in DEAL have hardly any experience in writing codes and data how they r going to evaluate from others. Perhaps they will get to learn a lot from the DP. Sir pl give this tender wider publicity because it is only a farce. They get all the information from you and will abort the contract later on. Beware all tenderers! they r all fraud and corrupt people.

Keep doing good work sir,

Warm regards

Tender Details – “Development of SCA core framework”, DEAL* Defence Electronics Application Laboratory, DRDO. Dehradun Start Date 10-08-2011 16:20:33 End Date  27-09-2011 13:30:00

Contact 

For any technical queries the DPs may contact the following:

Shri L. C. Mangal
Scientist ‘F’
Group Head – SDR Baseband Systems Group
Phone-0135-2223113 / 2789081
Email-lcmangal@deal.drdo.in
 
Shri Satendra Kumar Yadav
Scientist ‘E’
Phone-0135-2223173
Email-satendra@deal.drdo.in
Bloger

LET US CLEANSE THE DRDO!

Leave a comment

Ramshastri Justice Foundation

(Regd. No.:   Mah. 723 / 2010 / Pune)
 
Adv. B. R. Barge                                                                                      Dr. R. G. Taware
            President                                                                                                      Secretary                                                     Cell No. 9881750682                                                                                Cell No. 9423015022                                  Email: justicefoundationpune@gmail.com
 
 
Office: 16, Mata Chambers, Anandnagar, Old Sangvi, Pune: 411027.   Phone: 020-27282647.
 
No. CG/DRDO/07                                                                                                               Date: 09th  Aug. 2011

LET US CLEANSE THE DRDO!

 We are contemplating to file a Writ Petition (Public Interest Litigation) in High Court, Bombay on the subject of irregular extensions in service to the ranking officers (Directors, CCR&Ds etc.) in DRDO, beyond the age of superannuation.

Those, who have been affected by or are deprived off their rightful posts, may please contact.

Present post to which the officer is clinging, his date of birth and other details will be helpful.

  President / Secretary

  Ramshastri Justice Foundation, Pune

Uncategorized

How Fast DOP Works in DRDO for his Beloveds

Leave a comment

8th August 2011

Dear Dr Saraswat Ji Good Morning                      

How your DOP works please go through the following case of Sh Dharmendra Kumar Scientist ‘B’ SPIC, DRDO. The case Sh Dharmendra Kumar Scientist ‘B’ SPIC shows how DRDO top brass handles the case of their beloveds. The whole process done by DOP in such a manner that even lay man can smell of DOP’s rotten empire.

  1. DRDO issued 2 appointment letter to Sh Dharmendra Kumar
  2. DOP bypassed the CC and direct got your approval.
  3. Sh Dharmendra Kumar sent a letter from Pune on 3rd Feb 2011 to you from NDA, Khadakwasla letter no NDA/DK/Pers/DRDO/10-11 dated 03 Feb 2010 and on 14th Feb 2011 the whole case is processed by your most efficient DOP and his staff and a letter was dispatched by  Sh B B Sharma, Joint Director(Pers-TC) letter no DOP/01/00025/Misc/NG/01.

Sir can you tell the poor DRDO staffs that what channel is best to send grievances which are the more serious matters than Sh Dharmendra Kumar’s case or tell us Sh Dharmendra Kumar’s hot line with you.

I request all the applicant or petitioner who wants to settle their grievances from SA to route their application through Sh Dharmendra Kumar, Scientist ‘B’, SPIC, DRDO, New Delhi. His Mobile No/ land line No and home address you will get soon on website in interest of DRDO officials.

  1. Sh Dharmendra Kumar sent a letter from Pune on 17th March 2011 to DOP for request to extend his joining time and on 18th March 2011 DOP granted extension. DRDO only work in this speed at time of last week of every March for procurement cases.
  2. Sh Dharmendra Kumar was not in the strength of DRDO when 1st appointment letter was issued in his name i.e. 23rd Dec 2010 as he was already joined NDA on 22nd Dec 2011, then how come LDCE appointment offered him.
  3.  PMO is looking forward for name of Sh Dharmendra Kumar’s  in next DRDO award list as young scientist award, because Dr Vasudeva will definitely going to include his name for his great contributions to manipulating the fake procurement case with Sh Suchit  and Sh.Jitender Chug as you already aware that Director Vigilance, Ministry of Defence asked all expenditure done by SPIC up to 31st July 2011.

Hope you will take this case seriously in the interest of the organization and for building faith of DRDO officials.

Thanking you

Regards

Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun 248008  
Phone – 0135-2787750, Mobile,  9411114879
E-mail id  prabhu@dandriyal.com   , prabhudoon@gmail.com Website www.corruptionindrdo.com/