Tag Archives: Delhi

Drdo

Request for inquiry of fake experience certificate issued from Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Center for Biomedical Research North Campus, Delhi University.

Leave a comment
To                                                                                                  Date – 15th October 2014
Prof. Dinesh Singh,
Vice-Chancellor,
Delhi University,
Delhi -110007

 

Subject:     Request for inquiry of fake experience certificate issued from Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Center for Biomedical Research North Campus, Delhi University.

Reference: RTI reply received from CPIO, DU vide letter No Info/ OA/ 1761/ 2014/ 5294 Dated 30th September 2014

Sir,

Delhi University since its inception is guiding source for all other Indian universities due to its proximity with education ministry, UGC and power center at Delhi.

With passage of time, however, it has been noticed that casual attitude has been taken over and faculties are involve in recruitments in various government organizations as a expert and “very early they have adopted a culture of one man scratch another man back”

The opportunity give Delhi University for collaborating the science and technology with various labs have been diluted when some faculties shows leniency in performing the business which has lowered the image of DU.

One such example of this casual attitude has been surfaced when one senior scientist with ten years service annulled on last Friday 10th October 2014 as the appointment found manipulated and the DU environment biology faculty was participated as a expert for interview of Biotechnology scientist recruitment in RAC, DRDO.

It is astonishing fact that how DU administration allowed environment biology faculty to play role as expert for Biotechnology scientist recruitment and bunch of brilliant biotechnology candidate he selected environmental biology candidate. Basically he was instrumental for the said task but we all believe that no professor will help the corrupt official because rest candidates are also their students.

Another case observed of issuing experience certificate to Mrs S Geetha by Prof. Vani Brahmachari, ACBR. Earlier RTI reply by CPIO, DU clearly send that all six faculties specifically denied that Mrs S Geetha never work in any research project at ACBR including the signatory Prof. Vani Brahmachari.

Recent above reference RTI reply the information given by Prof K Natrajan, Offg, Director, ACBR vide letter no ACBR/14/843 dated 29/30 September 2014 stated that the issued certificate is genuine without furnishing any evidence financial/report/application/ appointment letter etc of Mrs S Geetha which can justify that Mrs S Geetha worked as research assistant for 38 days at ACBR.

It seems Prof K Natrajan, Offg, Director, ACBR not serious about the image of DU and trying to mislead the authorities of HRD ministries. He also not aware the Sh A K Antony already given approval for CBI inquiry on 29th October 2013 reference Notes at 48-55 ante and the observation of JS & CVO at note 56 ante (few pages is enclosed herewith for ready reference)

It is requested for the sake of DU image and for sake of eligible students who study hard to get good job and wish to serve nation but the nexus of corrupts ruins their honest wish, therefore, an authoritative investigation required for the matter pertaining to Mrs S Geetha. It will further stop the casual attitude of faculties and directors of Delhi University to play with future of genuine scholars.

Regards

Prabhu Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun -248008
0135- 2787750, 9411114879,
prabhudoon@gmail.com www.corruptionindrdo.com    

Enclosed.

  1. Experience Certificate issued    by Prof Vani Brahmachari.
  2. Assistant Registrar, Delhi university internal circular 
  3. RTI reply  CPIO,   Delhi university  
  4. CVO, MOD noting few relevant pages  
noting1
CVO, MOD Noting DRDO on recruitment complaint Page 1

   

CVO, MOD Noting DRDO on recruitment complaint page 12
CVO, MOD Noting DRDO on recruitment complaint page 12
CVO, MOD Noting DRDO on recruitment complaint page 13
CVO, MOD Noting DRDO on recruitment complaint page 13
CVO, MOD Noting DRDO on recruitment complaint page 26
CVO, MOD Noting DRDO on recruitment complaint page 26

                     

Drdo

RTI- Delhi University – Mrs S Geetha, Scientist, DIPAS, (D/O Dr W Selvamurthy, Ex – CC R&D) DRDO – Experience Certificate

Leave a comment
 
To                                                                                                     15th October2014
 Ms Meenakshi Sahay,
Assistant Registrar (College –T) & CPIO,
University of Delhi, Delhi – 110007

Hello,

Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005 in respect of Original Application (OA) No. 1761 of 2014 under RTI Act 2005. Your reply No.Info/OA/1761/2014/5294 dated 30th September 2014 received on 13th October 2014 as per Postal department the letter dispatched on 9th October 2014. The reply enclosed a letter of Offg. Director, ACBAR in which the information given as below

“ The experience certificate dated 2nd December 2003 issued by the Director, ACBR to Mrs S Geetha clearly indicates that Mrs  S Geetha worked for 38 days at ACBR as Research Assistant. Several short term Research/Teaching Assistants are engaged in the center for various academic activities. Prof. Vani Brahmachari was the Director (Offg) of during 2003 who is also competent authority to issue such certificate to bonafide short terms candidate. The experience certificate dated 2nd December 2003 clearly shows that it was signed by Prof. Vani Brahmachari in her capacity as Director, ACBR although Mrs S Geetha did not work in any of her research project directly which is reflected in the Note sheet dated 9th January 2013 internally circulated among the teachers of the ACBR after gap of ten years from the date of the certificate. Therefore, it is clear that the experience certificate issued by the Director, ACBR is genuine and there is no internal contradiction.”

As per above statement that Prof K Natrajan, Offg, Director, ACBR confirmed that the experience certificate was issued Prof. Vani Brahmchari in the capacity of Offg, Director, ACBR means Mrs  S Geetha was worked as research assistant for period of 38 days in ACBR.

  1. Please provide the official order of competent authority for appointed Prof. Vani Bharmchari as offg, Director, ACBR in 2003.
  2. Provide the period in which Prof. Vani Brahmachari worked as offg, Director, ACBR.
  3. As per Note sheet dated 9th January 2013 all six faculties were denied that Mrs  S Geetha had not worked with them, (I have RTI reply from DU is available ) but unfortunately Offg. Director, ACBAR confidently justifying that the issued experience certificate is genuine means Mrs  S Geetha worked as research assistant in ACBR. Please provide information with whom Mrs  S Geetha worked as research assistant name & designation ,as Prof K Natrajan, Offg, Director, ACBR confirmed the genuineness of experience certificate and must have documentary evidences to prove the authenticity of issued experience certificate.
  4. Please provide the mode of appointment of Mrs  S Geetha like if she applied against any advertisement or she was recommended by someone for research assistant.
  5. Provide the application of Mrs  S Geetha for the post of research assistant at ACBR
  6. Provide Mrs  S Geetha signed any document/ report generated while she worked as research assistant. Hope that as Prof K Natrajan, Offg, Director, ACBR is aware of latest forensic technologies where age of paper/ink can be dated.
  7. The modes of appointment given to research assistant by ACBR.
  8. Mrs  S Geetha mentioned in her application submitted to RAC, DRDO that she received Rs 5000/ month during working as research assistant at ACBR, Please provide the financial terms and condition of ACBR for research assistant and total amount paid to Mrs  S Geetha for 38 days working as remuneration/ Scholarship/salary etc.

Postal order of Rs 10 13F862053 enclosed

Regards

Prabhu Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun -248008
0135- 2787750, 9411114879,
prabhudoon@gmail.com www.corruptionindrdo.com             

 

Enclosed

  1. Experience Certificate issued  by Prof Vani Brahmachari.
  2. Assistant Registrar, Delhi university internal circular
  3.  RTI reply  CPIO,   Delhi university  
  4. RTI reply postal track     
    Mrs S Geetha's ACBR RA Certificate
    Mrs S Geetha’s ACBR RA Certificate
    Mrs S-Geetha-case-RTI-reply-by-DU
    Mrs S-Geetha-case-RTI-reply-by-DU

    geetha case rti reply

    geetha case rti reply1

Drdo

DRDO develops CO filters for submarines

Leave a comment

Snehlata Shrivastav,TNN | Sep 28, 2014, 04.46 AM IST
Nagpur: Like any automobile, submarines generate a lot of harmful gases like carbon-mono-oxide (CO). India was importing special room filters for submarines which could absorb CO as well as other gases. To ensure safety of the Naval staff, the Defence Research Development Organization (DRDO) has not only developed its own CO filters called ‘CFKIII room filters’ but also room filters that can absorb over 40 different gases, at almost one fifth of the imported cost.

The information on CO filter is on display at the three-day AXIS technical festival organized by students of the Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology (VNIT). In fact, India is the first country to develop a CO filter which can work for indefinite period even in heavy moisture conditions as compared to the Russian filter costing about Rs1 lakh.

On inquiring about the filter, sources in DRDO headquarters told TOI that the organization has developed other types of room filters too which can prevent over 40 harmful gases including hydrogen sulphide, ammonia, stibine, hydrogen cyanide, acrolein. These filters need to be changed after 45 days and one ship needs at least 14 different filters.

DRDO Gwalior laboratory has developed many equipment and techniques which can detect, protect and decontaminate the chemical warfare agents Sarin, Soman and Tabun. A filter paper like strip attached to any human body part changes into various colours that help in detecting the type of chemical. This lab has also developed a toe-to-head carbon coated suit and a mask which filters everything else and allows only oxygen to go in.

Another DRDO lab, Centre for Fire Explosives and Environment Safety in Delhi, has recently developed a light weight ‘fire proximity suit’ which has five layers of protective material. It has also developed an Emergency Escape Chute (EEC) which can take a load up to 4 to 5 tonne and can be used effectively for evacuating people from high rise buildings, oil rig platforms and can be used together with auto-inflatable raft. The lab is yet to transfer the technology to a manufacturer.

The Solid State Physics Laboratory of DRDO in Delhi has made an indigenous alternative hand held equipment to highly expensive imported one. Since it can detect chemical warfare agents effectively, it is being called as e-nasika or-e-nose which can sniff any chemical. It uses ‘surface acoustic wave’ or SAW sensors. It will be manufactured by Bharat Electricals Limited in Pune. Against the imported version costing Rs20 lakh, this one costs just Rs5 lakh.

Drdo

RTI, DRDO- DRL, Tezpur -II

Leave a comment
To,                                                                                                                              26th July 2014
Dr. RB Sharma, CPIO
DRDO HQ, Min. of Defence
DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg
New Delhi-110011                             

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of M/s Jangid Construction, RZF 40, Street No. 40, Sadh Nagar Part II, New Delhi 45. It is observed Dr Vijay Veer, Director, DRL, Tezpur giving undue favor to M/s Jangid Construction ignoring the guidelines providing in DRDO purchase manual 2005.

M/s Jangid Construction constructed Entomology Building in DRDE, Gwalior under supervision of Dr Vijay Veer and this old connection now continue in DRL, Tezpur. The all construction / renovation job of DRL, Tezpur are supposed to come under CCE(east) but it is observed all such work are given to M/s Jangid Construction with support sleeping firms. Most of cases are raised with following firms which itself the corruption evidence.

i)       M/s Jangid Construction, RZF 40, Street No. 40, Sadh Nagar Part II, New Delhi 45.

ii)       M/s Balaji Construction Co, Dwarka, Delhi 75

iii)       M/s Kushi Enterprises, West Patel Nagar, Delhi 08

iv)        M/s Bhagwati Enterprises, Shiv Block, Delhi 45

v)         M/s MRN Group, New Delhi 40

vi)       M/s M K Decorator, Palam Colony, Delhi 30

In most of the cases scientists of DRL, Tezpur split their demand so it can be execute through limited tenders with above firms, who is the boss ?

  1. Provide the supply order of M/s Jangid Construction for Entomology Building, DRDE.
  2. Provide the copy of all supply orders of M/s Jangid Construction in respect of DRL, Tezpur.

Note: the requested information is not come under exemption of schedule –II of RTI Act 2005. Since, March 2014 end DRDO stopped to provide information under shadow of exemption. It is requested in above para-one of this request it is clear cut mentioned the corruption/ favoritism/ abuse of power, so before denial of information your point wise explanation is required that the matter not pertain under corruption.

 

Regards

Prabhu  Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur,
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website www.corruptionindrdo.com

Registration Number            MODEF/R/2014/61335

Drdo

RTI- PCDA – LTC 80

Leave a comment
To                                                                          17th February 2014
Shri Pritam Dutta, IDAS,ACDA,
CENTRAL PUBLIC INFMATION OFFICER ,
O/o PCDA (R&D), West Block-V,
R K PURAM,
NEW DELHI- 110066              

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect to LTC  availed by DRDO officials /staff who travelled by Air India LTC – 80 scheme and claimed settled by Dy. CDA(R&D), Dy. CDA(R&D),

As per  Sh G S Malik, Director, DTRL, DRDO letter to Director Vigilance vide letter No DTRL/Dir/Vig_LTC/2014 dated 3rd January 2014 several official claimed LTC using Air India LTC 80 scheme ticket. It is observed that Shri Anil Kumar Maini, Director, LASTEC also received similar written complaint.

  1. Please provide the copies of Air India LTC 80 tickets Delhi to Port Blair and back claimed by DRDO officials / staff in financial year 2012 – 2013 and 2013 – 2014 and claimed settled by Dy. CDA(R&D), Metcalf House, Delhi

Note : Matter is directly related to corruption and not exempted under Section 24 (1)

Regards
Prabhu  Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur,
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website www.corruptionindrdo.com

Enlosed:

  1.  Copy of letter send by Sh G S Malik, Director, DTRL  to Director Vigilance, DRDO, Letter No DTRL/Dir/Vig_LTC/2014 dated 3rd January 2014
  2. Air India E- Ticket of Sh Sanjeev Kumar, Sc ‘E’, LASTEC, DRDO

Registration Number            MODEF/R/2014/60323

Drdo

Complaint to CVC – DMSRDE FUME HOOD PROCUREMENT CASE

12 Comments
To                                                                                                          
Central Vigilance Commissioner,
Central Vigilance Commission,
Satarkta Bhawan, A- Block, GPO Complex, INA
New Delhi-110023
 

SUBJECT: Corruption in procurement of Fume Hoods in DMSRDE Kanpur Officers involved in Procurement

  1. Sh. A.S. Parihar, Scientist ‘D’ – Indenter
  2. Sh. Shielendra Kumar, Scientist ‘E’ Head Estate & Work Division and also MMG division both.
  3. Dr. AK Saxena, Director & CFA
  1. Defence Materials & Stores Research & Development Establishment (DMSRDE), Kanpur is an establishment under Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO), Min. of Defence, DRDO Bhawan, New Delhi.
  2. DRDO’s Director Material Management distributed to all Labs & Establishments a manual named “DRDO Purchase Management -2006” which was duly approved by President of India and with the concurrence of Ministry of Defence (Fin/R&D) vide their ID No 752/IF (R&D) dated 20 March 2006.
  3. “DRDO Purchase Management -2006”  page no 12,  para 4.5.2 stated     Directors of Labs/Estts will observe adequate caution while working out detailed specifications of an intended procurement that these are not tailor made to suit a particular brand of product. Broad coverage of the functional performance and environmental parameters will be spelled out in the specifications to allow competition. For this purpose a computer-based data bank of similar products, along with broad specifications will be maintained and updated frequently so as to facilitate fair competition in purchases.
  4. The following case of procurement of Fume Hoods is totally violated procurement rules laid down by DRDO.
    • Tailor made specification was made and brand name as well as model number mentioned in tender inquiry.
    • Make cannot be mentioned in demand only item can be purchased whichever is having lowest prise. So he can purchase a branded item of particular firm unless it is propitiatory item. Bio base is Chinese Company so how they decided to purchase that brand when several manufactures and brands of Fume Hood were available in the Market
    • Item was purchased by Estate & Works Division, This division cannot indent & purchase Fume hood as this division is only for maintenance of Buildings & Govt accommodation.
    • Purchased qty 14 because the total price comes under fifty lakh which was within the limit of Director’s purchase power. Purchase Rules was violated as case was so designed that cost remain below 50 Lakhs (the Financial Power of Director)
    • Purchased exorbitant price because the same item is available in open market @ 1350 $ and dollar rate of date of supply order (19 November 2013) was Rs 62.26.
    • Open Market cost of  Fume Hood Chamber (Make- Biobase, Shandong Model- FH-1200 C) $1350 X 62.26 ( Dollar Rate on 19 Nov 2013 ) = Rs 84051.00
    • Fume Hood Chamber (Make- Biobase, Shandong Model- FH-1200 C) was purchased @ 290540.00 and Quantity 14 was purchased total amount Rs. 45,76,005.00. (With Tax)
    •  Actual cost of 14 no of Fume Hood Chamber (Make- Biobase, Shandong Model- FH-1200 C) Rs 84051.00 X 14 = Rs. 1176714.00
    •  Purchased exorbitant price by DMSRDE – Rs 290540.00 x 14 = Rs 4067560.00
    •  Total loss of poor tax payers Rs 4067560.00 – Rs. 1176714 = Rs 2890846.00 

FUME HOOD PROCUREMENT CASE

DMSRDE Fume Hood Demands Detailsfume demand   Demand Under worksfume demand under works DMSRDE, Kanpur Tender Details fume tender  DMSRDE, Kanpur placed Supply Order to KAN-THT (INDIA) Pvt. Ltd., Delhi to procure the item  details of which given below.fume supply order 5.   The facts stated above, it is amply crystal clear that prima facie material regarding Abuse of Authority by arrogant and corrupt administrator Dr. A. K. Saxena, Director DMSRDE exists.

6.    In view of the above mentioned facts and evidences it is earnestly requested that an order for through investigation of all procurement done by Dr. Arvind Kumar  Saxena after assuming charge as Director, DMSRDE, DRDO, Kanpur to stop further corruption and wastage of poor tax payers money.

Prabhu Dandriyal                                                                   22 January 2014
21-Sunderwal, Raipur, Dehradun -248008                                                                              
0135-2787750 – 91-9411114879
Email-prabhudoon@gmail.com,  www.corruptionindrdo.com
 

 

Annexure  – 1. Quotation  of  Fume Hood Chamber (Make- Biobase, Shandong Model- FH-1200 C)fume quotation
 
Drdo

SATYAMEV JAYATE -III – 30714/2013/ Vigilance 9 complaint has been sent to CVO MINISTRY OF DEFENCE for necessary action on 26th December 2013

2 Comments

Believe me fellow citizen, the culprits of deliberately creating hindrances in the opportunity and fundamental rights of the lakhs of the youth of this great nation for consideration for public employment in DRDO will be very soon brought to the book only with the active cooperation of the concerned youth candidates and their parents.

CVC Registered the complaint – vide 30714/2013/ Vigilance 9 on 25th November 2013
30714/2013/ Vigilance 9 complaint has been sent to CVO MINISTRY OF DEFENCE for necessary action on 26th December 2013

Appeal

I call upon all concerned youth members of the public of this great nation who either applied for various posts in CEPTAM 06. in DRDO And didn’t get call letters and who wanted to apply but couldn’t apply due to the deliberate bottleneck created in the form of mobile registration, concerned parents of those youth candidates and fellow honest citizens (which inter-alia includes honest employees and officers of DRDO also) to provide information of the following kinds of acts and omissions of deliberate corruption done in the form of sugar coated capsules (seemingly making believing the general public at large as if the culprits acted in public interest) containing only poison which turned out fatal to all those members of the youth who either applied against the various post under CEPTAM 06 in DRDO but could not get call letters or who could not succeed in applying just for want of mobile registration since after repeated attempts mobile registration couldn’t take place.

1. Corruption in the form of making mobile registration as mandatory for applying for the various posts

(a) Kindly provide the information of the attempts made by you and by your parents for mobile registration at mobile no. between to to complete the first mandatory step for applying for the various posts in DRDO against CEPTAM -06 .

(b) Kindly provide the information of the time period in which the website of CEPTAM Delhi remained un operational/un-accessible due to which you couldn’t apply online for the various posts in DRDO against CEPTAM-06.

2. Corruption in the form of non-issuance of call letters to the persons who applied online and also sent offline applications for direct recruitment of various posts in DRDO against CEPTAM-06

(a) Kindly send the print out of your online application form against which you did not get call letter.

(b) Kindly send photocopies of your offline application forms against which you did not get call letter.

(c) Kindly send photocopy of the counter foil of the Indian Postal Order which you have attached with your offline application form sent with the CEPTAM, Delhi under CEPTAM-06 in respect of which you didn’t get the call letter.

(d) Kindly intimate me the manner through which you submitted your offline applications form to CEPTAM, Delhi against which you did not get the call letter.

(e) Kindly intimate the efforts made by you to get issued call letters from CEPTAM (including the information of the phone number of CEPTAM Delhi on which you made your efforts) and the results of such efforts.

(f) Kindly intimate the name of the officials of CEPTAM whom you contacted personally or on official telephone of the CEPTAM, Delhi but still your grievance was not redressed.

3. Corruption in the form of issuing defective call letters.

(a) Kindly send photocopies of the online print out of your application from and the defective call letters issued to you due to which you could not appear in the exam of CEPTAM-06 of DRDO.

(b) Kindly send photo copies of your offline application forms and the defective call letters issued to you due to which you could not appear in the exam of CEPTAM-06 of DRDO.

4. Corruption in the form of allotting exam centre at far off places altering the choice given by the candidate.

(a) Kindly send photo copies of your online print application form and the call letter issued to you un which the centre of written exam was allotted at different far off place due to which you could not appear in the written exam.

(b) Kindly send photo copies of your offline print application form and the call letter issued to you in which the centre of written exam was allotted at different far off place due to which you could not appear in the written exam.

5. Corruption in the form of non-ensuring of the website of CEPTAM operational and functional just some days before the exam.

(a) Kindly intimate the date of your failed attempts when you wanted to access the website of CEPTAM to download the call letter but you could not open the website and hence you could not appear for the exam.

6. Corruption in the form of late sending the call letter to the candidates.

(a) Kindly send the photocopies of the call letters which you received late.

Drdo

Scientist seeks sexual favours, booked in MP – Times of India

Leave a comment

TNN | Dec 2, 2013, 05.49 AM IST

BHOPAL: A senior scientist at the Defence Research & Development Establishment (DRDE) in Gwalior has been accused of stalking, blackmailing and seeking sexual favours from a fellow researcher.

A complaint lodged with the police on Saturday.

Scientist Prabhat Garg was harassing his fellow researcher for the last three years, said police. She joined DRDE Gwalior in 2010 to pursue research.

The complainant later got married and settled in Karnataka two years ago. But Garg allegedly continued stalking and making calls and sending texts to her.

She told her husband and subsequently filed a complaint after which Garg was booked.

Superintendent of police Santosh Singh said case is being investigated and a team would be sent to Delhi to question Garg.

Drdo

Open Letter to Sh Avinash Chandra, SA to RM, DG DRDO

10 Comments

Dear

Shri Avinash  Chandra Ji, after you joined as DRDO boss, honest and neutral official expected and hoped for good decision, good administration, good cohesive  environment, hope you will shake DRDO with your full strength  to get rid of incompetent stuff.

But sorry to say you disappointed the honest scientists/ staff/ officials and they are not finding any reason to stay or giving their 100% output to DRDO.

Avinash ji, collect all your good energy and get rid of the nexus of culprits who are controlling SPIC, CCE, Department of Personnel, RTI Cell, RAC, CEPTAM and some Lab heads.

Every DRDO official knows acts and deeds of these corrupt officials but sake of their carrier not coming forward but sending anonymous or fake signed letters ( inputs are correct) to Prime Minister, Defence Minister and other government agencies and of course to you also, I have also received some from various labs. (Sending bunch to Honorable Defence Minister)

The increasing numbers of court cases are also perfect examples of mismanagement in DRDO.

The decision of giving responsibility of administration/material management to scientists is also going to be a big problem in the coming time.

Perfect administration and perfect procurement is not cup of scientists. They are not able to match with laid down rules of government of India. Day by day increasing number of anomalies / audit objections in recruitments / procurement are going to be a big issues.

Dr. P S Goel’s DO letter implementing of interaction for promotion from  Sc ‘ F’ to Sc ‘G’   without approval from cabinet is a clear cut  case of violation of Article 309 and the repercussion now started in shape of court cases which was hampering the progress of DRDO and created demotivation among senior scientists

Same in RAC/ CEPTAM encouraging recruitment of incompetent / fake degree / diploma appointment of such candidates who are not eligible as per SRO/ appointment on the basis of nepotism/ in this respect you only see the RTI’s on these issues, you will find clear picture of the future of DRDO.

You are under the impression that corrupt CPIO, Dr A K Tyagi is protecting DRDO. It is not true, instead of exposing the corrupt practices, he is trying to bury the information and very soon these corrupt practices will sink the DRDO ship. As you aware CVC already issued advice to CVO, MoD against the Dr A K Tyagi for “Regular Disciplinary action is recommended on: 9/9/2013“and you are not taking any action to remove him for the post of CPIO, DRDO. What does it mean, it means still you are in grip of corrupt officials. A honest advice is first change your staff officer and old staff of Dr Sarswat’s time, than only you will be find some change in DRDO’s scenario.

Avinash ji, we all very well know that you are washing dirty linen of Dr V K Sarswat’s several misdeed which are the outcome of mismanagement of Dr Sarswat, because he was only on? Government agencies very well know about that, and why he was not able to get extension,    Ms R. AMRUTHA VANI, SC ‘F’’s  (‘Below the Bench Mark’) case, Dr Neelam Bhalla’s, Sc ‘F’ (Workplace Humiliation, Harassment, Gender discrimination & Victimisation)  case etc. but problem is that you are dealing all issues with same set of officials ( Dr Sarswat’s  & Dr. W Selvamurthy’s gang) who created and responsible for these kinds of hurdles in DRDO for their own wasted interest.

CEPTAM Director enjoys all type of corrupt practices like he is engaging his wife and relatives in different recruitments boards as experts. Recent CEPTAM recruitment process he introduced mandatory SMS registration (cost Rs 3 to each applicant) for his personal benefit (he worked this out this without proper procedure) and due to this almost thousands of aspirant were not able to get their admit cards. In this process lot of SC/ST candidates also suffered, you can check with records, where Government of India facilitates to SC/ST candidates in recruitments without any fee. Almost 5 lakhs candidates applied nearly one lakh rejected and thousands of candidate could not appear due remote centre problem, candidates were not given asked choice centers, they received admit cards with centers like Goa, Mizoram, Chennai, Patna.

Regards

Date 26th September 2013

Prabhu Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur
Dehradun-248008
E-mail – prabhudoon@gmail.com, website- www.corruptionindrdo.com

Please go through the following letters which are self explanatory of your labs environment and administrative ability of your scientist.

Example Responsibility of Administration to Scientist – DMSRDE ION Dated 31st December 2012 a true example of DRDO helpless position – a perfect documentary evidence of how incompetency promoting in DRDO.

DMSRDE ION Dated 31st December 2012
DMSRDE – ION Dated 31st December 2012

dmsrde meeting1

dmsrde meeting2dmsrde meeting3

CEPTAM Recruitment Case – Few examples

  1.  Sh. Kamdev , SC candidate – Admit card not received  reason –  SMS registration
  2.  Sh. Kunal – Admit card received after one day   – 5 times he registered by SMS – Delhi local but centre was Ajmer
  3. Sh Satvir – Applied for post of welder and asked for local nearby centre Delhi but he was given centre Chennai
  4. Mohd Shahbaz – No Admit card received/ SMS registered/ application not found
  5. Sh Saroj Kumar- applied for 0217 Diesel Mech local Harsh Vihar, Delhi based   admit card received with Centre in Patna
  6. Sh Sandeep – applied for Fireman not received admit card – reason not known
  7. Ms Kavita – resident of Delhi, Admit card received given exam in Kanpur centre spend Rs 4000 will Director CEPTAM reimburse  or only busy minting money for himself and his relatives.

Hundreds of candidates wasted their days in front of CEPTAM reception but could not able get their admit cards.

Long list will be continue