Tag Archives: Director

Drdo

CORRUPTION IN PROCUREMENT OF CHEMICALS AT DMSRDE KANPUR

6 Comments
To                                                                                                          
Central Vigilance Commissioner,
Central Vigilance Commission,
SatarktaBhawan, A- Block, GPO Complex, INA
New Delhi-110023

SUBJECT:      MULTI-CRORE SCAM CORRUPTION IN PROCUREMENT OF CHEMICALS IN DMSRDE KANPUR COMPLAINT AGAINST

  1. MR. AMIT SARAIYA, SCIENTIST ‘D’, HEAD MATERIALS MANAGEMENT GROUP (MMG),
  2. DR. DARSHAN LAL, CHAIRMAN ‘STORES PRUCHASE COMMITTEE’  
  3. Dr. ARVIND KUMAR SAXENA, DIRECTOR, DMSRDE, KANPUR

Sir,

BRIEF FACTS OF THE COMPLAINT

  1. Defence Materials & Stores Research & Development Establishment (DMSRDE), Kanpur is an establishment under Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO), Min. of Defence, DRDO Bhawan, New Delhi.
  2. Purchase Management 2006 is applicable for procurement of store items in DRDO.  Gross irregularities and violation of Purchase Management 2006 was made in procurement of Chemicals in year 2012 when the cases were indented by officers of MMG under threat illegal orders of Head ‘Materials Management Group’ (MMG)& Dr. A K Saxena Director DMSRDE
  3.  Dr. A K Saxena Director is an incompetent, arrogant and corrupt administrator who has violated all the rules and regulations of purchase. In the year 2012 while chairing ‘Head of Divisions’ (HOD) meeting, he directed that all HOD’s shall ensure that all demands of chemicals what-so-ever should be immediately forwarded to Head MMG. Head MMG shall consolidate all the requirements and one order shall be placed to get maximum discount from the suppliers
  4. Accordingly Head MMG circulated a memo requesting for the details of chemicals as per the enclosed format. Now here is where criminal conspiracy starts and instead of placing one consolidated demand, Head MMG & Dr. A K Saxena, Director  & CFA split the orders of various chemicals to the tune of Rs. 2.2 Crores.
  5. Procurement of CHEMICALS

Chemicals worth total estimated cost of Rs.2,19,19,074/-were procured centrally by a single division i.e. Material Management Group on limited tender basis splitting total demand against requirements received from various divisions of lab

  • into 30 cases below Rs.10 lakh(to avoid TPC) during 10 months period(from 12 Oct 2011 to 31 July 2012)
  • these demands were cleared by the same SPC (Store Procurement Committee)  Chairman Darshan Lal Joint Director, and
  • issuing more than 40 supply orders during Apr 2012 to  Dec 2012
  • Point to be noted that only in Month of Oct 2011   22 Demands worth total estimated cost of Rs. 15333034.00 were raised out of which 16 Demands worth total estimated cost of Rs 11471067.00 were cleared in one SPC meeting held on 16th Nov 2011 by SPC (Store Procurement Committee) dealing cases costing less than Rs 10 lakh headedby Chairman Darshan Lal Joint Director. Further it has bypassed the expert higher level SPC (Store Procurement Committee) dealing cases costing more than Rs 10 lakh headed by an honest officer Chairman Dr. DK Setua, Addl. Director having expertise with chemical background who might have not permitted splitting of cases in this manner.
  1. These 30 No. Cases for which at least details up to supply order date(which confirms that supply order is prepared) are mentioned in following tables

Table-1

  • For Sl. 01-03 total estimated cost  is Rs. 2832300.00 and total value of 08 Supply orders is Rs. 2635059.00
  • Point to be noted that
    • These Demand are raised on Limited Tender basis by same indenter officer, on same date 31-Jul-12 ,
    • SPC conducted on 22nd Aug 2012,
    • CFA approval accorded on 05-Sep-12, Tender Enquiry issued on the same date 05-Sep-12, and
    • 08 No Supply orders worth Rs. 2635059.00 are placed on same date 4-Dec-2012.
    • Demands of chemicals vide DMSRDE/13MMG042 & DMSRDE/13MMG041 at Sl.No. 01 and 02 reflect same chemical “Ethylene Di Chloride AR Make: Rankem/SD fine /Qualigens /SRL Each Pack of 2.5 ltr”
    • The requirement of chemicals was split into demands below Rs. 10.0 Lakh to avoid TPC and open tender.
    • DRDO Chemical Rate Contract exists w.e.f. 17th Sep 2012 and placement of these supply orders under the RC would have fetched better quality at discounted prices.
    • Placement of these orders on limited tender to known local vendors ignoring DRDO Chemical RC  clearly exhibit vested interest through manipulation  in prices, quality, pack size etc so as to fetch financial benefits hence indicates financial corruption/ corrupt practices of giving business/ benefits to own firms.chem table1

Table-2

  • For Sl. 04-08 total estimated cost  is Rs. 3422198.00
    • These Demand are raised on Limited Tender basis in December 2011 from 02nd to 31st Dec2011,
    • These Demand are cleared in 05 SPC meetings  conducted over a period of 45 days from  21st Dec 2011 to 02nd Feb 2012
    • CFA approval accorded and Tender Enquiry issued over a period of 45 days from  26th Dec 2011 to 14th Feb 2012, and
    • Supply orders prepared over a month period from 17th Apr 2012 to 22nd May 2012.
  • Point to be noted that
  • The requirement of chemicals was split into demands below Rs. 10.0 Lakh to avoid TPC and open tender which would have fetched better quality at discounted prices. Further it has bypassed the expert higher level SPC (Store Procurement Committee) dealing cases costing more than Rs 10 lakh.

Placement of these orders on limited tender to known local vendors clearly exhibit vested interest through manipulation  in prices, quality, pack size etc so as to fetch financial benefits hence indicates financial corruption/ corrupt practices of giving business/ benefits to own firms.chem table2

Table-3

  • For Sl. 09-17 total estimated cost  is Rs. 6272502.00
    • From Sl No.09-15 Demand worth total estimated cost   Rs. 51.00 lakh are raised on Limited Tender basis on 31st Oct 2011  and Sl No 16,17 on 24,25th Oct 2011
    • These Demand are cleared in one  SPC meeting  conducted on   16th Nov 2011
    • CFA approval accorded and Tender Enquiry issued over a period of 15 days from  8th Dec 2011 to 21st Dec 2011, and
    • Supply orders prepared over six months period from  14th Jan 2012 to 22nd Jun 2012 (i.e. there appears no urgency).
  • Point to be noted that
  • The requirement of chemicals was split into demands below Rs. 10.0 Lakh to avoid TPC and open tender which would have fetched better quality at discounted prices. Further it has bypassed the expert higher level SPC (Store Procurement Committee) dealing cases costing more than Rs. 10 lakh headed by an honest officer Chairman Dr. DK Setua. Addl. Director having expertise with chemical background who might have not permitted splitting of cases in this manner.
  • Placement of these orders on limited tender to known local vendors clearly exhibit vested interest through manipulation  in prices, quality, pack size etc so as to fetch financial benefits hence indicates financial corruption/ corrupt practices of giving business/ benefits to own firms.chem table3

Table-4

  • For Sl. 18-30 total estimated cost  is Rs. 9060532.00
    • From Sl No.09-15 Demand are raised on Limited Tender basis over a period of 10 days from12th Oct 2011  to  21st Oct 2011
    • Out of these Demand most are cleared in one SPC meeting conducted on   16th Nov 2011 and only four demands were cleared in SPC meetings held on 8th Dec 2011 (01),  06th Jan 2012 (02 ) and 02nd Feb 2012 (01).
    • CFA approval accorded and Tender Enquiry issued over a period of 45 days from  29th Nov 2011 to 14th Feb 2012, and
    • Supply orders prepared over two and half months periodfrom  18th May 2012 to 30th  July2012.
  • Point to be noted that
    • The requirement of chemicals was split into demands below Rs. 10.0 Lakh to avoid TPC and open tender which would have fetched better quality at discounted prices. Further it has bypassed the expert higher level SPC (Store Procurement Committee) dealing cases costing more than Rs 10 lakh headed by an honest officer Chairman Dr. DK Setua, Addl. Director having expertise with chemical background who might have not permitted splitting of cases in this manner.
    • Placement of these orders on limited tender to known local vendors clearly exhibit vested interest through manipulation  in prices, quality, pack size etc so as to fetch financial benefits hence indicates financial corruption/ corrupt practices of giving business/ benefits to own firms.chem table4

From the facts stated above, it is amply crystal clear that prima facie material regarding Abuse of Authority by arrogant and corrupt administrator Dr. A K Saxena, Director DMSRDE exists.

    • That he entered into criminal conspiracy with Mr. Darshan Lal, Joint Director, Chairman SPC and Head MMG with an intention to cheat DRDO and exchequer’s money.
    • In pursuance of the said criminal conspiracy,  Dr. A K Saxena, Director and Mr. A K Singh, Technical Staff Officer of Director DMSRDE are tampering with evidence / documents that shall be prejudice to fair trial, investigation, trial or any inquiry.

In view of the above mentioned facts and evidences it is earnestly requested that an order for through investigation of all procurement done by Dr A K Saxena after assuming charge as Director, DMSRDE, DRDO, Kanpur to stop further corruption and wastage of poor tax payers money.

 

Date: 07th January 2014

 

Prabhu Dandriyal                                                                                                                             
21-Sunderwal, Raipur, Dehradun -248008                                                                              
0135-2787750 – 91-9411114879                                                                 
prabhudoon@gmail.com,  www.corruptionindrdo.com

 

Annexure -1 – ION DATED 12.12.2012 ISSUED BY MR. AMIT SARAIYA, HEAD MMG chem ion

Drdo

Complaint against Dr A K Saxena, Director, DMSRDE, DRDO, Kanpur -III

1 Comment
To                                                                                                
Central Vigilance Commissioner,
Central Vigilance Commission,
Satarkta Bhawan, A- Block,
GPO Complex, INA,
New Delhi-110023

SUBJECT

Complaint against Mr. Shielendra Kumar, Scientist ‘E’ & Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena, Director, DMSRDE, Kanpur For Corruption by issuing illegal & unauthorized Supply Orders for Cutting of Grass/Sarkanda, Pruning, Trimming & Cutting of Tress, Unauthorized construction of Parking Shades and Structural Alteration in R&D House(Director’s Residence) at DMSRDE, Kanpur

Sir,

BRIEF FACTS OF THE COMPLAINT

  1. Defence Materials & Stores Research & Development Establishment (DMSRDE), Kanpur is an establishment under Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO), Min. of Defence, DRDO Bhawan, New Delhi.
  2. Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena was appointed as Director, DMSRDE on 01st January 2011. Right from his joining he is involved in various kinds of Administrative and Financial irregularities that lead to Corruption.
  3. Mr. Shielendra Kumar, Scientist ‘E’ is heading three divisions in DMSRDE, Kanpur. These divisions are Material Management Group (MMG), Estate & Works Division and Paints & Coating Technology Division. He is  henchman of Dr. AK Saxena thereby he was appointed as Head of three major Corruption full divisions despite several senior officers to Shielendra Kumar has not been appointed as Head of any division in DMSRDE, Kanpur.
  4. Mr. Shielendra Kumar, Scientist ‘E’ made gross violation of DRDO Purchase Rules in issue of several illegal & unauthorized supply orders costing more than Rs. Twenty lakhs for cutting of grass/wild bushes/sarkanda, cutting/pruning & trimming of trees and unauthorized construction of Parking Shades in DMSRDE, Kanpur. He is also involved in unauthorized structural alteration in dedicated Government accommodation.
  5. DMSRDE, Kanpur is having 45 acres of defence land in which its Technical Area of DMSRDE has been constructed and lot of space near buildings, boundary walls etc is open and having more than 600 trees of various kind of wood including seesam, ukliptus, neem, sagaun etc.
  6. Supply Orders for cutting of grass/wild bushes/Sarkanda worth Rs.  3,86,998.00  By Shielendra Kumar, Scientist ‘E’ on orders of Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena

a.   No. 11026/1/D(Lands)/2000 Government of India, Ministry of Defence New Delhi, dated 31st August 2000, clearly lays guidelines for cutting of grass / Sarkanda in Defence lands. It says that commanding Officers (OC) / Head of the Establishments are authorized to remove/ cut/ dispose of grass/ sarkanda subject to the following conditions:-

    i.            The grass will always be cut in time to avoid any fire hazard etc.

    ii.            The OC will be personally accountable to ensure the cutting of grass in time/ safety of the Ammunition/ ordnance Depots.

  iii.            A Board of Officers will be convened by the concerned Station HQrs of the Ammunition Depot/Ordnance Depot for disposal of the grass/ sarkanda and a representative of the DEO concerned will also be included in the Board.

  iv.            The disposal of the grass cutting rights shall be by calling tenders and highest bidder will be allotted the contract.

 v.            At the onset of the grass cutting season, the Board of Officers will inspect the land and prepare the Minimum Reserve Price (MRP) of the grass to be cut/ removed.

  vi.            The MRP would be approved by the OC/ Head of the Establishment concerned in consultation with the DEO. However, in case of a difference of opinion, the final decision rests with the OC/Head of the Establishment.

  vii.            In case of receipt of bids lower than the MRP, the authority competent to accept the same would be the GOC-in-C of the Command in consultation with the Principal ·Director, DE, in respect of cases where the MRP exceeds Rs. 10,000/-. In the case of MRP of Rs. 10,000/- and below, the OC in consultation with the DEO would be competent to accept bids lower than MRP.

 viii.            The proceeds will be credited to the Central Treasury by the OC Ammunition Depot/ Ordnance Depot.

b.     Copy of Letter No. 11026/1/D(Lands)/2000 Government of India, Ministry of Defence New Delhi, dated 31st August 2000 is enclosed as Annexure-1. The same rule is quoted here for ready reference.

c.     The same rule applies to DRDO and is applied in letter spirit except for DMSRDE since 1st January 2011 when Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena, a corrupt officer having scant respect of laid down rules and regulation took the charge as Director DMSRDE.  There is no provision of cutting grass/Sarkanda under DRDO’s Purchase Management 2006.  Gross irregularities, violation and criminal misconduct have been committed by Mr. Shielendra Kumar, Scientist ‘E’ and Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena in cutting of grass / sarkanda in DMSRDE. The major irregularities and violations of rules are given below.

               i.            The head of Establishment shall ensure that a Board of Officers is convened by the concerned Station HQrs for disposal of the grass/ sarkanda and a representative of the DEO concerned will also be included in the Board. No such Board of Officers with a representative of DEO has been ordered by Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena, Director DMSRDE.

             ii.            The disposal of the grass cutting rights shall be by calling tenders and highest bidder will be allotted the contract. No such exercise was done and instead Mr. Shielendra Kumar and Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena entered into a criminal conspiracy by inviting tenders for execution of this illegal work at the cost of exchequers money. Under normal circumstances the highest bidder would have been allotted the work and his money deposited in Central Treasury. The travesty of the matter is that instead of department gaining money has lost the same.

           iii.            The rules clearly say that at the onset of the grass cutting season, the Board of Officers will inspect the land and prepare the Minimum Reserve Price (MRP) of the grass to be cut/ removed.  Both in the calendar year 2012 and 2013 Mr. Shielendra Kumar and Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena have split the demand.

d.     Details of illegal Supply Orders and execution of unauthorized work regarding Cutting/Cleaning of dense grass and Sarkanda by Mr. Shielendra Kumar and Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena under a criminal conspiracy is as mentioned below: cvc sarkanda table1

e.    Copies of supply orders for demands no. DMSRDE/13WKS007 dated 17 May 2012, DMSRDE/13WKS014 dated 08 June 2012, DMSRDE/13WKS038 dated 05 Nov 2012 and DMSRDE/14WKS021 23 Sep 2013 are enclosed as Annexure-2 , Annexure-3, Annexure-4 & Annexure-5.

f.     M/s Vikalp Enterprises, Kanpur is under contract with Director, DMSRDE for Environmental Control Hygiene and Maintenance Services at DMSRDE, Technical Area since past ten years and this agreement renewed in each contract year with mutually agreed terms & conditions. In annexure-1 of this contract between Director, DMSRDE, Kanpur and M/s Vikalp Enterprises, Kanpur for the year 2012 it is clearly mentioned that “Cleaning/trimming of trees/bushes on the sides of roads up to one meter and Removal/clearance of grass/bushes around test beds, buildings, sheds, petrol bunk and transformers” is included in scope of work.

g.      In the year 2010, 2011 and 2012 supply orders were issued to M/s Vikalp Enterprises, Kanpur for Environmental Control Hygiene and Maintenance Services at DMSRDE. The average cost of Supply Order is Rs.9, 90,000. Thereby the job of cutting of grass/sarkanda/bushes/trimming of tree were executed by M/s Vikalp Enterprises in DMRDE and fake cases were indented and supply orders were issued to M/s J.S. Enterprises by Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena, Director, DMSRDE.

h.      The contracts awarded under supply orders as stated in point (d) were issued to M/s JS Enterprises which is fake firm of Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena and whole amount of money went to Dr. Saxena as no such work was carried out by M/s JS Enterprises as the said work was already covered under scope of work of the contract awarded to M/s Vikalp Enterprises, Kanpur for Environmental Control Hygiene and Maintenance Services at DMSRDE, Technical Area. Thereby this is clear case of fraud & Corruption of public money of Rs. 4, 81,498.00 by Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena and Shielendra Kumar.

i.      It is  explicitly clear that illegal, gross irregularities, subversion and violation of  rules and criminal misconduct has been committed by Mr. Shilendra Kumar, Scientist ‘E’ and Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena in cutting of grass / sarkanda in DMSRDE. Instead of the Government gaining Rs. 2.50 lakhs of money from the bidder these two corrupt officers have made exchequer to lose an amount of Rs.  8.0 lakhs of money.

7.     Supply Order for Pruning and Trimming of Tree in Tech. area and residentialcvc sarkanda table2

8.      Copy of the demand no. DMSRDE/13WKS035 dated 03 Oct 2012 is enclosed as Annexure-6. The vendors mentioned in demand are fake and not concerned with activities of cutting, trimming and pruning of trees. Director, DMSRDE is not authorized to issue any Supply Order for cutting/trimming/pruning of trees in defence land and only authorized agency for this purpose in Ministry of Defence is Principle Controller/DEO, Defence Estate Office, Lucknow. Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena issued Supply Order without any authority to private vendor by heavy loss of revenue to exchequer and permitted to take along the wood costing more than ten lakhs free of cost to vendor along with cost of Supply Order. Copy of the supply order no. 13AM0036 dated 26 Feb 2013 is enclosed as Annexure-7.

9.      Supply Order to private vendor for construction of Parking Shade in DMSRDE, Kanpur

      i.            An application under RTI Act 2005 dated 04 October 2013 was submitted to CPIO, DMSRDE, Kanpur for seeking information about Parking. CPIO, DMSRDE vide their letter dated 29 October 2013 replied that “Director, DMSRDE, Kanpur has not ordered for construction of any vehicle parking stand inside DMSRDE not being constructed”. Copy of the CPIO letter dated 29 October 2013 is enclosed Annexure-8.

    ii.            First Appellate Authority, DRDO vide their letter dated 10 December 2013 informed that “M/s Gupta Construction is not a registered vendor in DMSRDE”. Copy of the FAA letter dated 10 Dec 2013 is enclosed as Annexure-9.

  iii.            Director, DMSRDE ordered Estate & Works Division to initiate the case of Vehicle Parking Shed. This case was initiated in two times with different nomenclature. Details are given below.cvc sarkanda table3

     vi.            Total cost expenditure in construction of Parking Shade was Rs. 12,70,000(Rupees Twelve Lakh seventy thousand only). Copy of Supply Order No. 13AT0230 dated 14 Jan 2013 is enclosed as Annexure-10.

    vii.            Director is not authorized to execute any civil works under build up. The only authorized agency to carried out said civil construction works under DRDO is MES. First items have been purchased on 14 Jan 2013 and the construction has been executed on 8 May 2013. As M/s Gupta Construction is not registered vendor of DMSRDE so Supply Order should not be executed to M/s Gupta Construction under Purchase Management 2006 of DRDO.

10.      Massive Structural Alterations/Additions in R&D House DMSRDE, Kanpur by Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena, Director, DMSRDE, Kanpur and Mr. Shielendra Kumar were executed during 01 March 2011-30 Sept 2013 in which unauthorized construction has been done by misuse of power, diversion of MES fund and misappropriation of funds. Approximate amount of Rs. Thirty lakhs were expenditure in illegal & unauthorized construction in Government accommodation at DMSRDE by Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena.   

11.    In aforesaid above mentioned cases Corruption has been meted out by Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena, Director, DMSRDE, Kanpur and Mr. Shielendra Kumar, Scientist ‘E’, Head, Material Management Group and  Head, Estate & Works Division by misuse of powers for personal gain for which they were not authorized to do  under DRDO Purchase Management 2006.

Therefore, in light of the above mentioned facts and evidences, I it is requested you to issue order for inquiry and disciplinary action against Mr. Shielendra Kumar, Scientist ‘E’ and Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena, Director, DMSRDE by CVO, Ministry of Defence.

Prabhu Dandriyal                                                  28th  December 2013                                                                                 
21-Sunderwal, Raipur, Dehradun -248008                                                                              
0135-2787750 – 91-9411114879 Email-prabhudoon@gmail.com,  www.corruptionindrdo.com

ANNEXURE-10

INDEX cvc sarkanda table4

To,                                                                                                                 
Joint Secretary (Estt.) and Public Grievances & CVO,
Ministry of Defence, Government of India, 97, South Block,
New Delhi -110 105
 
To
Sh Avinash Chander
SA to RM,DG,DRDO
Room No 541, DRDO Bhawan
Rajaji Marg, New Delhi – 110105
 
To                                                                                                                              
The Defence Minister
Room No -104, South Block
New Delhi – 110011 
Drdo

Complaint against Dr A K Saxena, Director, DMSRDE, DRDO, Kanpur -II

Leave a comment
To                                                                                                                    26th December 2013
Central Vigilance Commissioner
Central Vigilance Commission
Satarkta Bhawan, A- Block, GPO Complex, INA
New Delhi-110023
 
To,                                                                                                                 
Joint Secretary (Estt.) and Public Grievances & CVO,
Ministry of Defence, Government of India, 97, South Block,
New Delhi -110 105
 
To
Sh Avinash Chander
SA to RM,DG,DRDO
Room No 541, DRDO Bhawan
Rajaji Marg, New Delhi – 110105
 
To                                                                                                                              
The Defence Minister
Room No -104, South Block
New Delhi – 110011

SUBJECT : Complaint against Dr A K Saxena, Director, DMSRDE, DRDO, Kanpur

DRDO has an approved policy for guiding various procurements (Purchase Management –2006 document issued vide Govt. letter No DMM/PP/0000205/M/868/D(R&D) dated 22nd March 2006 amended vide letter No DMM/PP/0000206/M/2386/D(R&D) dated 21st Aug 2006

CORRIGENDUM No: 2 DMM/II/PP/0000207/M/3041/D(R&D) dated 15th Oct 2007

CORRIGENDUM No: 3 DMM/II/PP/0000208/M/3201/D(R&D) dated 16th Sept 2008

CORRIGENDUM No: 4 DMM/II/PP/0000210/P1/92/D(R&D) dated 14th Jan 2011

DRDO Directors never read above procurement documents because each and every case where Director’s pet agent involved means the above purchase rules have no meanings.

  1. Shri Rakesh Kumar Gupta, Scientist ‘C’ Applied Chemistry Division raised a demand No. DMSRDE/13552009 for “Laboratory Microprocessor Based Programmable High Temp.Furnace” on 30th August 2012.
  2. SPC date 13th September 2012
  3. DRDO Hqrs approval 1st October 2012
  4. Tender Date 1st October 2012 (see the efficiency)
  5. TEC on 6th December 2012
  6. TPC on 16th Jan 2013
  7. Supply order place to M/s Omega Furnace Industries Bangalore, “Omega Atmosphere Controlled Muffle Furance ” vide SO No  DMSRDE/13AT0240/552/12-13/CMS-II dated 26 Feb 2011
  8. Supply Order of Rs 16,81,500.00
  9. Stores Received on 27th September 2013 vide RIN No 14LP0149
  10. Now on the Director’s pet agent M/s Manglam Traders come in front and a review TPC was done,  under Chairmanship of  Dr. Sarfaraz Alam, Sc’G’               para two of review TPC                                                                                                     “Now, the firm M/s  Omega Furnace Industries, Bangalore has intimated that billing and supply of stores will be done by their local dealer M/s Manglam Traders, Kanpur, vide letter of even no dated September 24, 2013”                                           Para three of review TPC                                                                                                  “The finance rep told that the stores have been supplied by M/s Manglam Traders, Kanpur. Hence, the payment may be made to M/s Manglam Traders, Kanpur”      Para four of review TPC                                                                                                       “ In view of aforesaid TPC recommends the following
    For-Supply the stores & payment may be made to M/s  Omega Furnace Industries, Bangalore Read-Supply the stores & payment may be made to M/s Manglam Traders, Kanpur
  11. In view of above details, it is clear Violation of Purchase Management 2006 Rule 7.15(a) Constitution of TPC/NC,  it is requested that registered the complaint against Dr A K Saxena, Director, DMSRDE and his blind followers who are mishandling the government funds for their own vested interest. A thorough investigation is needed to explore the relation between Dr A K Saxena, Director, DMSRDE and M/s Manglam Traders, Kanpur. It may be reveal crores of crores rupees scam in DMSRDE and RCI, DRDO.
 
Prabhu Dandriyal                                                                                                                            
21-Sunderwal, Raipur, Dehradun -248008                                                                              
0135-2787750 – 91-9411114879                                                                 
prabhudoon@gmail.com,  www.corruptionindrdo.com
Drdo

Complaint against Dr A K Saxena, Director, DMSRDE, DRDO, Kanpur

1 Comment
To                                                                                         24th December 2013
Central Vigilance Commissioner
Central Vigilance Commission
Satarkta Bhawan, A- Block, GPO Complex, INA
New Delhi-110023
 
To,                                                                                                                  
Joint Secretary (Estt.) and Public Grievances & CVO,
Ministry of Defence, Government of India, 97, South Block,
New Delhi -110 105
 
To
Sh Avinash Chander
SA to RM,DG,DRDO
Room No 541, DRDO Bhawan
Rajaji Marg, New Delhi – 110105
 
To                                                                                                                               
The Defence Minister
Room No -104, South Block
New Delhi – 110011 

SUBJECT : Complaint against Dr A K Saxena, Director, DMSRDE, DRDO, Kanpur

DRDO has an approved policy for guiding various procurements (Purchase Management –2006 document issued vide Govt. letter No DMM/PP/0000205/M/868/D(R&D) dated 22nd March 2006 amended vide letter No DMM/PP/0000206/M/2386/D(R&D) dated 21st Aug 2006

CORRIGENDUM No: 2 DMM/II/PP/0000207/M/3041/D(R&D) dated 15th Oct 2007

CORRIGENDUM No: 3 DMM/II/PP/0000208/M/3201/D(R&D) dated 16th Sept 2008

CORRIGENDUM No: 4 DMM/II/PP/0000210/P1/92/D(R&D) dated 14th Jan 2011

However, every Director of DRDO Labs has fixed their own agent (supplier) who can supply from needle to missile components or any high tech components/systems. In fact to this agent is always behind each and every supply national or international. This agent searches the world market and identifies a manufacturer / suppliers and obtains the details & specification and passed to Director for further procurement.

The following case is the example of modus oprendi of procurement case which directly benefit the lab director.

  1. DMSRDE wanted to procure 50 Lit. High Temperature Reaction System.
  2. Dr A K Saxena, Director, DMSRDE, DRDO , Kanpur discussed this requirement with his pet supplier M/s Manglam Traders, Kanpur
  3. Mr Anish Gupta from M/s Manglam Traders sends a mail to Dr A K Saxena on 6th December 2011

Subject: “Offer for High Temp. Reaction Unit”

“The line diagram attached is not exactly as per their offer, they have forwarded us understand it will be somehow like the same. As per our line of requirement they will send us in 2 to 3 days.” Attached two file with this mail

(i)     DMSRDE_Techno-Commercial_Reaction-unit-50lit (enclosed)

(ii)   IPID0022 (enclosed)

4.      Dr A K Saxena forwarded this mail to Sh J N Srivastava  , Scientist ‘F’  indenter on  22 Dec 2011.
 
5.        The DMSRDE_Techno-Commercial_Reaction-unit-50 lit proposal was originally send by the manufacturer “De Dietrich Process Systems India Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai” REF: DDI/DMSRDE/534.  DATE: 30th Nov 2011. In thirteen page proposal with specification and terms of condition and in page ten of price quoted Rs 62,50,000/- .

6.    In DRDO procurement policy lab Directors have power to sign up to 50 lakhs only.
Since the cost was escalating the limit, so Dr A K Saxena asked M/s Manglam to split the quote.
7.     As desired by Dr A K Saxena, Mr Anish, partner of M/s Manglam again send a mail on 27th Feb 2012

Subject : “LAB REACTOR”

“As per your discussion held with Mr. Manish enclosed please find here polycarbosilane reactor splitted in two quotes along with their technical prposal and specs for Tender Enquriy”. Attached five files with this mail

(i)                 Specification for High Temp. Reaction Overhead System (enclosed)

(ii)               DMSRDE_Techno-Commercial_50lit_High_Temp_Reactor-Price_Bid (enclosed)

(iii)             DMSRDE_Techno-Commercial_Reaction_Overhead_assembly-Technical_Bid (enclosed)

(iv)              DMSRDE_Techno-Commercial_Reaction-unit-50lit (enclosed)

(v)                Specification for 50 liter High Temp. MONEL Reactor (enclosed)

9.    The case split in two i. –High Temp. Reaction Overhead System – price quoted Rs 28,50,000/-

ii.- 50 Ltrs. High Temp. Monel Reactor – price quoted Rs 38,50,000/-

10.   Dr A K Saxena forwarded this mail to Sh J N Srivastava, Scientist ‘F’ intender on 2 March 2012.
11.   Amazing, a supplier dictates the specifications and quotations details of tender enquiry this is the harsh reality and modus oprendi of DRDO procurement scenario.
12.    As dictated by supplier/agent the demands raised by

(i)                 File no DMSRDE/13PPD003 dated 19-Apr-2012
 With new nomenclature – High Temp. Reaction Overhead System,
SPC date 3rd May 2012,
CFA (Dr A K Saxena) Approved 23rd  May 2012,
DRDO HQ APPROVAL 23-May-2012 & Recommended ,
Tender no 13ATT022 date 05-Jun-2012,
TEC-21st August 2012,
TPC – 30th August 2012,
Supply Order No 13AT0165 – 13th September 2012 to M/s De Dietrich Process System, Mumbai,
Supply Order Cost- Rs 30,93,750.00,
Supply Received on 28th Jan 2013 vide RIN No. 13UP0271
 
(ii)               File no DMSRDE/13PPD004 dated 19-Apr-2012
With new nomenclature – 50 Ltrs. High Temp. Monel Reactor,
SPC date 3rd May 2012,
CFA(Dr A K Saxena) Approved 23rd  May 2012,
DRDO HQ APPROVAL 23-May-2012 & Recommended,
Tender no 13ATT022 date 05-Jun-2012,
TEC-21st August 2012,
TPC – 24th August 2012,
Supply Order No 13AT0168 – 20th September 2012 to M/s De Dietrich Process System, Mumbai,
Supply Order Cost- Rs 43,31,250.00,
Supply Received on 28th Jan 2013 vide RIN No. 13UP0270
 

13      Reactor was deliberately split into two parts in budget forecast and two separate FBE numbers allotted to bring the purchase within Director’s power by Dr A K Saxena.
 
14.     Two Technical Evaluation Committees one headed by Dr. D N Tiphati and the other by Mr. Darshan Lal clear the split cases and Dr. Sarfaz Alam Chairman of Store Purchase Committee clears these split cases on the same day.   
 
15.     Mr J N Srivastava, Scientist ‘F’ indenter protests by saying that “The splitting of one item into two is against the purchase procedure of DRDO and CVC’s guidelines“. Dr A K Saxena forced him to process case in split way because of DRDO Directors having absolute power and absolute power means absolute corruption..
 
16.      However on 12th October 2013, Dr A K Saxena sends a memo DP/15 to Mr J N Srivastava strangely enquiring as to why this case of reactor was split and not purchased as a single unit. Dr A K Saxena is not satisfied with the reply of Mr J N Srivastava that he was instructed by Dr. Ashok Rajan the programme Director to indent and instead pressurizing Mr J N Srivastava to justify the unjustable.
 
17.       Till date the reactor was not assembled  and poor tax payer money was wasted, although the payment was not cleared but manpower cost of project was wasted in the interest of Dr A K Saxena.
 
18.      Poly-di-methyle-saline (PDMS) cannot be processed and converted into Polycarbosailine as a product without assembling both the parts of reactor.
 
19.      Poly-di-methyle-saline (PDMS) already purchased worth lakhs of rupees from Dr A K saxena’s pet supplier (Mr Anish Gupta) The PDMS case will send separately.
 
20.       Dr A K Saxena violated all the laid down DRDO procurement rules mentioned above.
 
21.       It is requested that the case may thoroughly examined keeping mind to cost to benefit ratio and the role of DRDO Hqrs rep and PCDA (R&D) involvement. Fix the accountabilities and booked the culprits at the earliest.

Prabhu Dandriyal                                                                                                                             
21-Sunderwal, Raipur, Dehradun -248008                                                                               
0135-2787750 – 91-9411114879                                                                  
prabhudoon@gmail.com,  www.corruptionindrdo.com

Annexure – 7

  1. DMSRDE_Techno-Commercial_Reaction-unit-50lit
  2. IPID0022
  3. Specification for High Temp. Reaction Overhead System
  4. DMSRDE_Techno-Commercial_50lit_High_Temp_Reactor-Price_Bid
  5. DMSRDE_Techno-Commercial_Reaction_Overhead_assembly-Technical_Bid
  6. DMSRDE_Techno-Commercial_Reaction-unit-50lit
  7. Specification for 50 liter High Temp. MONEL Reactor
Uncategorized

SATYAMEV JAYATE Jai Ho Jai Ho Jai Ho

3 Comments

 

To                                                                                        20th December 2013
Honorable Defence Minister
Room No – 104, South Block
New Delhi-110011

SATYAMEV JAYATE    Jai Ho      Jai  Ho        Jai Ho

Honorable defence Minister of India on 29th October 2013 ordered CBI inquiry against the corrupt top DRDO officials.

“Also ordered and recommended replacement of Recruitment & Assessment Centre ( RAC) by suitable agency like UPSC”

I congratulate all the honest and innocent workforce of DRDO, who did noticed the misadventures of DRDO Hqrs & Directors of lab and informed the Honorable Defence Minister/ Honorable President of India through registered complaints. These corrupt officials used to write their own constitutions such that they can misinterpret the government laid down rules and misappropriate the government funds for their own benefits, under the shadow of secrecy and OSA 1923, and they swallowed their ugly acts.

God gave me courage to fight against the corrupt officials of DRDO. I have begun this journey just after “KARGIL WAR”. DRDO did consumed thousand & thousand crores, did not delivered any significant product which can utilize in “KARGIL WAR” and then General Malik uttered “casualties in the conflict could have been reduced had the Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO) “not come in the way”

“It has taken fifteen years to convince the government of India about involvement of DRDO officials/ Directors in neck deep corruption.”

On 28th October 2013 Defence Secretary Sh R K Mathur put up note to Defence Minister with proof of involvement in recruitment of scientists unfairly with manipulation and hiding facts while investigation, trying to close three times the investigation with wrong feedbacks by following top DRDO officials.

Four Recruitment  Cases of  Mrs T Chandrabanu, Scientist ‘F’, Mrs S Geetha, Scientist ‘C’, Ms Swati Srivastva,  Scientist ‘C’   Ms Dolly Bansal, Scientist ‘C’  

  1. Civilian Padma Awardee 2003, Former Scientific Advisor to Defence Minister, DG-DRDO 2004-2008
  2. Civilian Padma Awardee 1998 & 2013, Former Scientific Advisor to Defence Minister, DG-DRDO 2008-May 2013, Chairman of The Aeronautical Society of India Hyderabad Branch,  President, C.R.Rao Advanced Institute of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science (AIMSCS)
  3. Former Distinguished Scientist & Chief Controller – R&D (LS & IC),DRDO , President – Amity Science, Technology and Innovation Foundation, DRDO Technology Leadership Awardee (2010), Scientists of the year Awardee 1989, President – Federation of Indian Physiological Societies Father of Ms S Geetha
  4. The then Distinguished  Scientist, CC R&D (NS M & HR)
  5.  Ex- Director of Personal, Scientist ’H’, Outstanding Scientist, Suspended just two hours before retirement from service. Scientists of the year Awardee 2007, Father of Ms Swati Srivastav
  6.  Ex-Director, DTRL, DRDO retired in May 2013, Best Techno Managerial Services/Popular Science Communication Award 2011
  7.  Ex- Additional Director, RAC, DRDO, Father of Ms Dolly Bansal
  8. Ex- Director of Personal, Scientist ‘G’ Scientist of the Year Award – 2003, Ex-Director, Dte of Life Sciences, DRDO HQrs (2002) DRDO, the recipient of Vijnana Rathna jointly awarded by National Centre for Science & Technology Communication, New Delhi and Science Centre, Gwalior in 1991
  9. Ex-Director, DIPAS, DRDO (appointed Director(DIPAS), Delhi, wef 26 April 2002) winner of HH Loescheke Research Prize in Techniques/ Instrumentation- 2002, Maj Gen SL Bhatia Oration Awardee 2006,HH Loescheke Research Prize in Techniques/ Instrumentation- 2002
  10. the then Director, RAC, DRDO 2004, Ex Director, PEACE , 10 May 2001-15 July 2003, was awardee the DRDO Technology Award-1995

 A very strong recommendation from Honorable Defence Minister highlights the incompetence of existing Recruitment & Assessment Centre ( RAC). Honorable Defence Minister recommended the replacement of RAc by suitable recruitment agency like UPSC from financial year 2014-15.

CBI inquiry is big blow for DRDO having lakhs crores  infrastructure, having more than 30000 strong scientific / technical work forces, having 52 labs across the country.

Some of the above top ex DRDO officials’ calls on to Honorable Defence Minister to convince their innocence during last to last week and expressed that CBI inquiry may stop further research work in DRDO. Honorable Defence Minister very well knew that in the last 30-40 years of their scientific carrier what are their ground contribution because DRDO measurably failed to deliver any significant product in our last “KARGIL WAR”. They forgot that before them or after them whatever DRDO achieved or achieving that is because of honest people work force not by their corrupt / nepotism /incompetent group.

DRDO directors demonstrated their incompetency several times but they manage major share in defence budget every year. They do not deserve single penny until unless they are able to develop an import substitute.

With fake degree’s the manpower were selected as charge-man/ technical assistant and become scientist’H’ outstanding scientist, distinguished scientists by purchasing degree from private institutions, deemed universities and also manipulating by DIAT itself, crores of crores rupees were distributed by DRDO every years in the name of scientific development but now by CGDA audit also revealed that this money is routing through private institutes and deemed universities. It also confirmed facts that if any one check DRDO’s M Tech/PhD’s/ honorable degrees then will found that the money connection and degrees allotments like reveri’s by private universities and deemed universities etc. And unfortunately this mechanism also starts following in government intuitions in the name of resource development.

The incompetence of DRDO directors have been observed and felt by services Hqrs. Since inception of DRDO till 1990, DRDO used to work very closely on General staff requirement and Generals were closely monitoring day to day developments of DRDO. But when DRDO started “working on major programs” without prior knowledge of basic science &technology gave assured commitment for product development which never saw the light of the day.

The time has come for sincere and honest efforts by scientific community for an end result/ product development.

Honorable Defence Minister is requested to thoroughly investigate the DRDO procurement policy which has made the scientist a mere suppliers. Every director of 52 Labs has fake companies or associations with suppliers. Investigation will reveal that incompetent suppliers who are in touch with DRDO director beside his knowledge base, if he is rice exporter/ simple computer peripheral sellers /simple traders, he can sell any high-tech missile parts/ high tech laser components / high end software’s or anything which required by DRDO scientists in national interest or strategic applications. Dilemma these high tech information is shared by these incompetent suppliers with their families in kitchen and dining table. This is only for money matter nothing else no national interest, no values, no moral. In last 10 years honorable defence minister and national security adviser also received n numbers of anonymous letter but having truth and IB also gave confirmation reports.

Sir, how can you imagine wonders from this mind set the lab directors of DRDO ?  Absolute power, Absolute corruption.

Government of India, Ministry of Defence should reconsider the appointment of Scientific Adviser to RM as it was done through search committee before 1984. A person with a moral values /strong scientific knowledge base known across the globe/ technical leadership/ technology contributions like  Dr. Daulat Singh Kothari,  Prof. Suri Bhagavantham, Dr. Basanti Dulal Nagchaudhur I, Dr. Raja Rammana, etc.

The selection of Scientific Adviser in house the incompetent manpower has damaged the scientific temperament. The current environment / work culture there are no special or outside observation encouragement for innovation, creativity, scientific achievements, etc, only incompetent/ yes man/ are encouraged. Today in DRDO no transparency in recruitments / promotions /procurements is observed, every lab facing nepotism/ yes man culture.

Sir, I want to congratulate you for taking such strong decision and giving signal to all corrupt official of DRDO, in spite of big lobbyist ex – DG, SA to RM who have good connection in PMO.

The decision is timely, well awaited Lokpal has passed honorably from both the houses and Lokpal recommends appropriate punishment for corrupt officials, “They will get their due”

Jai Hind

Drdo

British Legacy and DRDO

10 Comments

British / Company Raj ruled this country for nearly 200 years and as result few Indian still does not believe that we are independent.

DRDO being the premier government organization, how come dishonored the standing instruction of honorable Supreme Court and the announcement made by honorable President.

The Supreme Court 10th December 2013 ruled that red beacon lights on vehicles can only be used by people listed as “high dignitaries”, that too only when they are on duty. Stating that the red beacons and multi-toned horns are reflective of “Raj mentality” and “an antithesis of the concept of a republic”

Recently Dr V K Saraswat, Ex D G, DRDO visited Gwalior   to attend a social function on 15th & 16th December 2013.

The Director, DRDE, DRDO Prof. (Dr.) M.P. Kaushik Sc.`H’ provided his Ex- Boss a Siren / Red light fitted car, A Pilot Vehicle and an Innova Car escort. May be Prof. (Dr.) M.P. Kaushik Sc.`H’ not aware of 10th December 2013 Supreme Court’s direction or ?

Dr W.Selvamurthy, Ex CC R&D, DRDO and very big scientist as quoted by Dr Ashok K Chauhan, Founder President, Amity Group and Life Sciences big boss of DRDO never preferred Prof. (Dr.) M.P. Kaushik Sc.`H’ as Director, DRDE and offered him to join as Rajbhasha Director in DRDO Hqrs. However, Dr V K Saraswat observed Prof. (Dr.) M.P. Kaushik ability of follow of British Raj legacy and Prof. (Dr.) M.P. Kaushik also honored Dr V K Saraswat’s belif on him.

Prof. (Dr.) M.P. Kaushik Sc.`H’ has  demonstrated his scientific ability through enclosed paper.

How can person involved in scientific fraud can able to run a scientific organisation with scientific ethics, what will be the quality of products out of such fraudulent research work.

Following are the links of his paper in which he has copied a major part from a foreign author, In one paper he has copied results of previous paper n shown as new compound, and surprisingly he is going to give one of the co-author of the paper as laboratory scientist of the year award for 2013.

mp 1mp 2mp 3mp 4DM1DM2 Po1Po2MCR1MCR2MCR3MCR4MCR5MCR6MCR7

Drdo

CORRUPTION IN PROCUREMENT OF ANTIVIRUS – DMSRDE

3 Comments
 
To                                                                                                            17th December 2013
Central Vigilance Commissioner
Central Vigilance Commission
Satarkta Bhawan, A- Block, GPO Complex, INA
New Delhi-110023

SUBJECT : CORRUPTION IN PROCUREMENT OF ANTIVIRUS

COMPLAINT AGAINST :  Mr. SARVESH KUMAR, SCIENTIST ‘F’ and  Dr. ARVIND KUMAR SAXENA, DIRECTOR, DMSRDE, KANPUR

Sir,

BRIEF FACTS OF THE COMPLAINT 

  1. Defence Materials & Stores Research & Development Establishment (DMSRDE), Kanpur is an establishment under Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO), Min. of Defence, DRDO Bhawan, New Delhi.
  2. Purchase Management 2006 is applicable for procurement of store items in DRDO.  Gross irregularities and violation of Purchase Management 2006 was made in procurement of Antivirus Software in year 2013 when the cases were indented by Mr. Sarvesh Kumar, Scientist ‘F’. The major irregularities and violations of purchase rules are given below.

i.        Method/Mode of Procurement: Method of procurement in all the three cases of Quick Heal Antivirus was Local Board. When there was a consolidated demand of 372 Antivirus and total cost of the case was around Rs. 270000.00 then case should be raised under Limited Tender as per Rule 7.6 of PM 2006. Vide letter No. DMM/II/PP/0000207/M/3041/D(R&D) dated 15th Oct 2007 Corrigendum No. -2 Directors of Establishments are empowered to constitute Local Purchase Committee for purchase up to cost of Rs. 1.0 Lakh on urgent requirements by amending Rule 6(d) of PM 2006. Copy of the letter is enclosed as Annexure-7. The same rule is quoted here for ready reference.

Purchase of goods by purchase committee: Purchase of goods costing above Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) only and up to Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh) only on each occasion may be made on the recommendations of a duly constituted Local Purchase Committee consisting of three members of an appropriate level as decided by the Director of Lab/Estt. The committee will survey the market to ascertain the reasonableness of rate, quality and specifications and

Identify the appropriate supplier. Before recommending placement of the purchase order, the members of the committee will jointly record a certificate as under. CFA will ensure that splitting of demands is avoided.

ii.        Splitting of consolidated demand of Antivirus in three parts: Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena split the consolidated the demand in three parts and misused his official position & powers so that case could not go under Limited Tender. In all cases of three local boards supply order was placed to the same vendor. This establishes vested interests of Dr. Saxena and Mr. Sarvesh Kumar using Local Board for purchase of Antivirus instead of Limited Tender. This leads loss to public fund and Corruption of Rs. 37920.00 by Mr. Sarvesh Kumar.

iii.        As per provisions of Purchase Management 2006 Rule 5.1.1(b) –Purchase orders will not be split-up to avoid the necessity for obtaining sanction of the higher authorities. Copy of the rule is enclosed as Annexure-8. Sprit of Purchase Rules and CVC Guidelines is that “The proposals shall not be split merely to bring them within the delegated powers”.

iv.           Local Board did not make market survey to ascertain the reasonableness of rate, quality and specifications and identify the appropriate supplier, rather one vendor M/s P. S. Computronics pre-fixed by Dr. Saxena was allowed to submit three quotations to Sarvesh Kumar and board members were forced to sign the certificates and other purchase related papers. Hence purchase procedure according to Purchase Management 2006 was not followed and grossly violated in this case.

3.           Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena, Director, DMSRDE, Kanpur and Mr. Sarvesh Kumar, Scientist ‘F’ are posted in DMSRDE, Kanpur. Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena is Director, DMSRDE with effect from 01 January 2011.

4.           Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena, Director, DMSRDE dissolved Information Technology Division on 02 Dec 2013 and constituted a new division “Computer Science Division” under headship of Mr. Sarvesh Kumar, Scientist ‘F’.

5.            Procurement and installation of Antivirus in all computers available in DMSRDE was one of the charters of Information Technology Division. Every year this division was purchasing about 300 units of Antivirus Licenses for security of PCs. These Antiviruses are having life time of one year from date of installation.

6.            In the year 2011, a demand was initiated for procurement of Antivirus Licenses with following details. Copy of the demand is enclosed as Annexure-1.table1

7.             300 units of Quick Heal Total Security Antivirus were purchased in the year 2012 on the basis of demand mentioned above. Details of procurement are given below. Copies of Supply Orders issued on 14 Nov 2011 are enclosed as Annexure-2.

table2

8.           Unit price details of Quick Heal Antivirus purchased in year 2012 are given below.table3

9.            During the period his posting at Information Technology Division, DMSRDE, Kanpur from 01.01. 2011 to 02.12.2013, Mr. Sarvesh Kumar, Scientist ‘F’ made following procurements as indenter on orders of Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena, Director. Copies of the demands initiated by Sarvesh Kumar are enclosed as Annexure-3LIST OF CASES INDENTED AND ITEMS PROCURDED BY MR. SARVESH KUMAR, SCIENTIST ‘F’

table4 Demand status of cases initiated by  Mr. Sarvesh Kumar is enclosed as Annexure-4.

10.            In Information Technology Division, DMSRDE, Kanpur three Scientist Mr. R.P. Bhat, Scientist ‘F’, Mr. Sarvesh Kumar, Scientist ‘F’ and Mr. N.P. Gupta, Scientist ‘C’ were posted from 19 Feb 2012- 02 Dec 2013. Mr. R.P. Bhat, Scientist ‘F’ was Head of Information Technology Division.

11.              IT Division sought Proposal for Antivirus for procurement of Quickheal Total Security Antivirus from M/s Well Known Computers Pvt Ltd, Kanpur in the year 2013 on 14.01.2013. Copy of the proposal dated 14.01.2013 is enclosed as Annexure-5. The details of the proposal Well Known Computers are as under.

table5

12.            In the year 2013, for procurement of Quick Heal Total Security Antivirus (300 Units) a Statement of Case was put-up to Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena, Director, DMSRDE for procurement of Antivirus under Limited Tender through Head IT Division but Dr. Saxena turned down the case and constituted a Local Board for procurement of Antivirus.  This Local Board was constituted of Mr. Sarvesh Kumar, Scientist ‘E’ (now Scientist ‘F’) Chairman, Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Scientist ‘D’ and Mr. N.P. Gupta, Scientist ‘C’.

13.             On direction of Dr. Saxena, Mr. Sarvesh Kumar split the demand of Antivirus licenses in three parts and gets financial sanction from Dr. Saxena, Director in three cases under Local Board. Total consolidated demands of 372 Antivirus licenses were split in three parts so that cases remain under financial powers (Rs. 1.0 lakh) of the Director and procurement could be made under Local Board. Details of procurement of Quick Heal Total Security Antiviruses in the year 2013 by Mr. Sarvesh Kumar, Scientist ‘F’ are given below.table6

These Quickheal Antivirus packs were received by Mr. Sarvesh Kumar on 11 Apr 2013 vide Receipt & Inspection Note (RIN) No. 14LP0009 and 14LP0010 dated 11 April 2013. Copies of the receipts are enclosed as Annexure-6.

14.        Unit price details of Quick Heal Antivirus purchased in year 2013 by Mr. Sarvesh Kumar are given below.table7

15.         It is very clear from the observation of the Purchase Proposal of Well Known Computers and procurements made by Mr. Sarvesh Kumar that the rates of Quickheal Antivirus are higher in later case. This lead loss to Government fund due to corrupt practices adopted by Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena and Mr. Sarvesh Kumar. Comparative details of both cases are given below.

Comparative rates of Well Known Computers (Proposal) and P.S. Computronics (Sarvesh)table8

Loss to public fund on purchase of Antivirus by Sarvesh Kumar on split of consolidated demand by Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena, Director, DMSRDEtable9

16.      Before placing the order the IT division can see these online offers which are less then quoted price and negotiate for best price from vendors in the interest of organization. Even that the for bulk there paper license offers are available.
17.       Therefore purchases made by Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena and Mr. Sarvesh Kumar by split of consolidated demand of Antivirus lead loss to public fund by Rs. 37920.00 and in turn make a scope of Corruption.

VIOLATION OF DIRECTOR’S POWER AND CONDUCT RULES

i.     Misuse of power & position for personal gain
ii.    Violation of Rule 3(1) and 3(2)(i) and 3(1)(iii) of CCS(Conducts) Rules 1964                   iii.    Splitting of demands of Antivirus in three parts and Constitution of Local Board instead of Limited Tender for purchase of Antivirus                                                                   iv.   Sanctioning of three cases of purchases each just below Rs. 1.0 Lakh of his financial powers

AS HEAD “Computer Science Division” MR. SARVESH KUMAR, SCIENTIST ‘F’ VIOLATED THE DRDO PROCUREMENT RULES

i.       Did not follow the purchase procedure of Local Purchase Committee. Didnot make any market survey instead collected three quotations by hand from representative of M/s P. S. Computronics, Kanpur and forced to sign on the papers to other two members of the board.
ii.       Gross violation of conduct under Rule 3.(1) of CCS(Conducts) Rules 1964

Therefore, in light of the above mentioned facts and evidences, may kindly investigate the matter. This may be the “tip of iceberg”. Further investigation may reveal violations of procurement for personal gain in the tune of corers of rupees.

The classic example from DMSRDE, Kanpur is the violation of procurement rules for the purchase of   “High Temp. Reaction Overhead System” 28,50,000 &   “50 Ltrs. High Temp. Monel Reactor” 38,50,000. This split case example of where Director’s power is limited up to 50 lakh with a Hqrs rep. because without splited the system cost was Rs 62.5 lakh. The details will be followed.

Similar misadventure was committed several times in the name of technology development by Ex, DG, DRDO Dr V K Saraswat, where financial power was limited up to 50 corers  and CAG in its special audit noticed violation of splitting the procurement cases while CCPA approved for Rs 150 corers.

Regards

 Prabhu Dandriyal
21-Sunderwal, Raipur, Dehradun -248008
0135-2787750 – 91-9411114879 
prabhudoon@gmail.com, www.corruptionindrdo.com
table10
 
Drdo

SATYAMEV JAYATE

Leave a comment

BELIEVE ME FELLOW CITIZENS, DAYS OF CONTINUANCE OF THE SERVING CORRUPT OFFICERS OF DRDO IN GOVERNMENT SERVICE ARE VERY LIMITED AND THE COUNTDOWN HAS STARTED FOR THEIR REACHING TO THEIR RIGHTFUL PLACE OF BEHIND THE BAR PUBLIC NOTICE

All fellow honest citizens are called upon to provide information of corruption in DRDO so as to file a public interest litigation (PIL) to eradicate corruption from DRDO, Ministry of Defence.

This is a matter of great happiness to one and all that at least 10 (ten) prima-facie corrupt very senior retired scientists of DRDO are facing thorough investigation of the CBI on the approval of the Hon’ble honest Defence Minister Sh. A.K. Antony who is a beacon of hope to all honest fellow citizens. Now it has been decided by the likeminded retired and serving employees/officers of DRDO and by the interested honest fellow citizens to eradicate altogether every form of corruption from DRDO. So, I call upon all fellow honest citizens, retired and serving employees and officers of DRDO to kindly bring into the kind notice of me about the acts of corruption, criminal misconduct amounting to corruption, criminal conspiracy to commit criminal offences, breach of trust by the public servants of DRDO on the following aspects through whatever means suitable to them (i.e.through post, through email and through fax etc.).

1.      Corruption in Direct Recruitment for various posts in DRDO

(i)      Acts and omissions of Corruption in direct recruitment of non-gazetted staff in admin & allied    cadre and in  DRTC cadre of DRDO.

(ii)     Acts and omissions of Corruption in direct recruitment of Scientist ‘B’ under DRDS cadre of DRDO through   scientist entry test (SET) scheme.

(iii)      Acts and omissions of Corruption in direct recruitment of Scientist ‘B’ (for isolated posts) and  Scientist ‘C’, ‘D’, ‘E’, ‘F’,‘G’ & ‘H’ through lateral entry scheme.

(iv)     Acts and omissions of Corruption in direct recruitment of Scientist under DRDS cadre through ROSA Scheme.

(v)      Acts and omissions of Corruption in direct recruitment of Scientist under DRDS cadre through NRI Scheme.

(vi)     Acts and omissions of Corruption in direct recruitment of Scientist under DRDS cadre through campus recruitment scheme.

(vii)   Acts and omissions of Corruption in direct recruitment of Scientist under DRDS cadre by   making former teachers and guides of the candidates as members of the selection committees for direct recruitment of scientist.

(viii) Acts and omissions of Corruption in direct recruitment of Scientist under DRDS cadre by   misinterpreting true meaning of the concerned SROs and by violating the express provisions of the SROs.

(ix)    Acts and omissions of Corruption in direct recruitment to any post in DRDO (particularly to the post of Scientist) from the blood and marriage relatives of senior scientists of DRDO.

2.       Corruption in promotion for various posts in DRDO

(i)      Acts and omissions of Corruption in promotion given through Limited Departmental Competitive Exam (LDCE) method to DRTC personnel.

(ii)     Acts and omissions of Corruption in promotion given to the post of Scientist ‘B’ through LDCE  method to DRTC personnel.

(iii)    Acts and omissions of Corruption in promotion to the post of  Scientist C, D, E & F done through assessment boards of RAC by not creating the documents of the marks given by each member of the assessment board or by destroying such record or by not taking into cognizance the marks of individual members of the assessment boards.

(iv)    Acts and omissions of Corruption in promotion to the post of Scientist G & H (both outstanding scientists and distinguished scientists) through peer committee review method by rejecting the recommendation of the earlier committee or by nominating favorable members in the peer review committee or by taking into consideration the fake contribution mentioned by the candidates without ascertaining the correctness of the same.

(v)     Acts and omissions of Corruption in constitution of the assessment boards for promotion of scientist to the post of scientist C, D, E & F.

(vi)    Acts and omissions of Corruption in constitution of the members of peer committee for promotion to the post of Scientist G &H.

(vii)   Acts and omissions of Corruption in promotion done by CEPTAM through assessment to various non-gazetted and gazetted posts of DRTC cadre of DRDO.

(viii) Acts and omissions of Corruption in constitution of the assessment boards for promotion done by CEPTAM through assessment to various non-gazetted and gazetted posts of DRTC cadre of DRDO.

(ix)    Acts and omissions of Corruption in making promotion in Admin & allied cadre, DRTC cadre & DRDS cadre of DRDO by violating the express provisions of the concerned SROs.

3.       Corruption in permanent absorption of deputationist and service officers against various posts in DRDO

(i)      Acts and omissions of corruption in permanently absorbing the deputationist against the various posts of DRDO

(ii)     Acts and omissions of corruption in permanently absorbing the service officers in the DRDS cadre of DRDO.

(iii)    Acts and omissions of corruption in permanently absorbing service officers on the higher posts in DRDS cadre of DRDO in comparison to last post held by them in Defence forces.

4.       Corruption in making compassionate appointment in DRDO

(i)      Acts and omissions of corruption by giving false reports by the board of officers in favor of some candidates and in against to some candidates.

(ii)     Acts and omissions of corruption by taking into cognizance fake certificates of some candidates and ignoring genuine certificate of some candidates.

(iii)    Acts and omissions of corruption by appointing some candidates on impersonation basis.

(iv)    Acts and omissions of corruption in making appointment by twisting and distorting the extant government policy.

5.      Corruption in handling vigilance cases and matters

(i)      Acts and omissions of corruption by not implementing the standing policy of DOP&T (fully endorsed by DRDO HQ) regarding transfer of personnel and officers of DRDO holding sensitive appointments at regular interval.

(ii)     Acts and omissions of corruption on the part of director of vigilance & security of DRDO HQ by not taking into custody the original concerned record of DRDO and not submitting the same to the CVO of MOD within a maximum period of one month pertaining to complaints of vigilance nature submitted to CVC under Public interest disclosure and protection of the informer (PIDPI) resolution (colloquially-whistle blowers complaints) and forwarded to the Director of Vigilance & Security of DRDO HQ through CVO of MOD.

(iii)    Acts and omission of corruption in the form of submitting false report by the custodians of the concerned record of DRDO to the Director of Vigilance & Security pertaining to PIDPI complaints forwarded by CVC to the Director of Vigilance & Security of DRDO HQ through CVO of MOD.

(iv)    Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of not ascertaining the correctness of the report submitted by the custodians of the record of DRDO to the Director of Vigilance & Security of DRDO HQ by Director of Vigilance & Security of DRDO HQ and forwarding the same to the CVO of MOD leading to escape of the corrupt officers of the DRDO.

6.      Corruption in giving service extensions to the senior scientist of DRDO after attaining the age of superannuation

(i)      Acts and omissions of the corruption in the form of devising separate Performa in violation of the Performa prescribed by the DOP&T and submitting the proposal to the DOP&T in the tailor-made Performa for service extension of senior scientist in DRDO after attaining the age of superannuation.

(ii)     Acts and omissions of the corruption for initiating proposals for service extension of ineligible senior scientist as per the FR 56(D), processing and getting approval of such proposals from DOP&T and from appointment committee of cabinet.

(iii)    Acts and omissions of the corruption in the form of giving false comments and false appreciations and false contributions in favor of chosen retiring senior scientists in the concerned note sheets of the concerned files so as to extend illegal service extension to some chosen scientists by misrepresenting the material facts.

(iv)    Acts and omissions of the corruption by disregarding the complaints of vigilance angle pending against some of the retiring senior scientists and pushing forward proposal for service extension to them to do irreparable loss to public interest.

7.      Corruption in making buildings and infrastructure facilities and equipping such facilities with the necessary store      items in DRDO

(i)      Acts and omissions of corruption in awarding contract to particular contractors (having cartel or having an existing fake firms) for supply of stores and hiring of services for purely or mainly administrative nature of function of DRDO.

(ii)     Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of involvement of blood and marriage relatives of high officials of DRDO as owners, as board of directors or acting as partners in the firms or contractors to whom DRDO has been giving regular supply orders.

(iii)    Acts and omissions of corruption of any kind in tendering procedures for supply of stores and hiring of services and manpower in DRDO.

(iv)    Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of submitting inflated bills, of the store item purchased or the services hired, to the offices of DCDA (R&D).

(v)     Acts and omissions of corruption involving the colorable exercise of authority to abuse and misuse the authority vested in the capacity of senior government functionary for vested interests with regard to purchase of stores and hiring of services and manpower.

(vi)    Acts and omissions of corruption involving the cases of corruption in the form of misplaced sense of economy in purchasing stores and hiring services and manpower in DRDO.

(vii)   Acts and omissions of corruption involving any other kind of financial impropriety.

(viii) Acts and omissions of corruption by dismantling some portion of the newly constructed official buildings without actual need and to get the same renovated lavishly.

8.      Corruption in purchase of stores and in hiring of the services in DRDO exclusively or mainly on administrative nature of jobs

(i)      Acts and omissions of corruption in procurement of stores and hiring of services for purely or mainly administrative nature of function of DRDO.

(jj)     Acts and omissions of corruption in awarding contract to particular contractors (having cartel or having an existing fake firms) for supply of stores and hiring of services for purely or mainly administrative nature of function of DRDO.

(iii)    Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of involvement of blood and marriage relatives of high officials of DRDO as owners, as board of directors or acting as partners in the firms or contractors to whom DRDO has been giving regular supply orders.

(iv)    Acts and omissions of corruption of any kind in tendering procedures for supply of stores and hiring of services and manpower in DRDO.

(v)     Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of submitting inflated bills, of the store item purchased or the services hired, to the offices of DCDA (R&D).

(vi)    Acts and omissions of corruption involving the colorable exercise of authority to abuse and misuse the authority vested in the capacity of senior government functionary for vested interests with regard to
purchase of stores and hiring of services and manpower.

(vii)   Acts and omissions of corruption involving the cases of corruption in the form of misplaced sense of economy in purchasing stores and hiring services and manpower in DRDO.

(viii) Acts and omissions of corruption involving any other kind of financial impropriety.

9.      Corruption in awarding DRDO chair, chairman of the boards of DRDO and DRDO fellow

(i)      Acts and omissions of corruption for initiating processing and approving the proposal for awarding DRDO chair, chairmanship of the various boards of DRDO and DRDO fellowship to undeserving candidates by misrepresenting material facts.

(ii)     Acts and omissions of corruption done by the serving senior scientists of DRDO HQ in the form of quid-pro-quo to those retired scientists in the form of awarding DRDO chair, chairmanship of the various boards and DRDO fellowship who gave clean chit in the corruption cases against the serving senior scientists.

(iii)    Acts and omissions of corruption for initiating proposals to remove the age limit of 70 years for DRDO chair to give undue advantage to chosen retired scientists like SK Salwan.

(iv)    Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of giving DRDO chair to those retired chairman of RAC who was involved in rule making activity illegally for assessment of scientist F for promotion to the post of scientist G in 2011.

10.     Corruption in the form of misleading the parliament of India

(i)      Acts and omissions of the corruption in the form of false report submitted to either house of parliament about the successfulness of the particular project which was actually not successful.

(ii)     Acts and omissions of the corruption in the form of giving false report to either house of the parliament with regard to involvement and entrusting of Admin & allied cadre responsibilities to the scientist and technical manpower of DRDO.

11.     Miscellaneous nature of corruption in DRDO

(i)      Acts and omissions of corruption in the nature of disobeying the direction of law by the senior officer of DRDO while acting in official capacity.

(ii)     Acts and omissions of corruption in the nature of breaching the trust of public in the capacity of public servants by senior scientist of DRDO violating their official capacity.

(iii)    Acts and omissions of corruption and criminal conspiracy to breach the trust of public in the capacity of public servant and to commit other criminal offences with common intention to do so.

(iv)    Acts and omissions of corruption in the nature of joining those private educational or commercial concerns by the retired senior scientist of DRDO within 01 year from retirement to whom DRDO have given funds and acted in collaboration with them.

(v)     Acts and omissions of corruption in the nature of embezzlement of govt. money in DRDO in whatever manner possible.

(vi)    Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of misappropriation of govt. money by twisting the material facts and acting in collusion.

(vii)   Acts and omissions of corruption in the nature of false claim of TA/DA and LTC by using flyer points and charging from the govt. exchequer in the name of LTC.

(viii) Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of drawing HRA illegally while residing in govt. guest houses by the very senior functionaries of DRDO.

(ix)    Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of using govt. vehicle for personal uses & showing them as official usage.

(x)     Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of weekly visiting native places situated at Hyderabad and Bangalore in the pretext of official duty and charging huge amount as air fare by the very senior scientist of DRDO HQ.

(ix)    Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of showing false expenses in other heads of accounts for actual expenses of lakhs of rupees incurred for liquor parties and lavish dance parties arranged every year and directors’ conference in Metcalfe House, Delhi and at Development Enclave, Delhi.

(x)     Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of acquiring and amassing disproportionate movable and immovable assets by the very senior scientists contrary to their known sources of income.

(xi)    Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of posting and retaining unauthorized Gazetted and non-Gazetted manpower of AFHQ cadre in DRDO HQ.

(xii)   Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of illegally posting AFHQ cadre officers in the labs of DRDO at Delhi.

(xiii) Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of creation of illegal and unauthorized designations in DRDO HQ and in the labs of DRDO without the authority/approval of Finance Ministry.

(xiv) Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of willful distraction and non-maintenance of the concerned record as per the provisions of public record act 1993 so as to avoid fixation of responsibility against the illegal acts of the very senior scientists of DRDO.

(xv)   Acts and omissions of corruption in the form of allotting govt. accommodation to non-eligible persons in DRDO’s own accommodation by the Estate Managers of the EMU of DRDO.

Don’t be afraid of anything, be bold and be knowledgeable in the sense that whoever has committed criminal offences of criminal conspiracy for committing breach of trust and using and issuing fake certificate or tampering in govt. records or indulging in criminal misconduct amounting to corruption for committing any kind of criminal offences can be caught and brought to the book at any time as per the provisions of IPC 1860, Cr. PC 1973 and prevention of corruption act 1988. There is no bar of limitation act in initiating criminal case by any person for committing criminal offences by the high serving and retired functionaries of DRDO. The only thing is important is that whatever information you provide to me should be verifiable from some independent govt. document whether in your custody or not and wherever available. Don’t think that particular case of corruption in DRDO in your knowledge is some 15 years or 20 years old. Documentary evidences created during ordinary transaction of official work in DRDO are like the guided missiles in which very senior scientist of DRDO are very expert. Don’t forget that the responsibility to eradicate corruption from DRDO lies on shoulders of every stakeholder. Please do contribute in this effort of nation building for which next progeny of ours will always remember us. Fellow honest citizens of this great country are the biggest stakeholder to eradicate corruption from DRDO.

JAIHIND

Drdo

RTI -CVO-MoD

1 Comment
To                                                                                12th November 2013
Samir Ranjan Amin
U/Secretary &  CPIO
Room No – 340, Office of Director of Vigilance
B- Wing Sena Bhawan                                                                                                                                                                     Rajaji Marg, New Delhi -110105

Hello,

Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005 in respect my complaint to CVO Shri. Sameer Kumar Khare, Joint Secretary (Estt.) and Public Grievances & CVO, Ministry of Defence, Government of India, dated 23rd October 2013, Subject: Foundation Laid for Recruitment Scam in DRDO.

Information Sought

  1. Provide the present status of complaint.
  2. Copy of reply if any received from DRDO

Regards

Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur,Dehradun-248008
Phone – 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website – www.corruptionindrdo.com
 
Dear Sir/Madam,
Your RTI Request has been filed successfully on RTI Online Portal. The following are the details:-
Registration Number: MODEF/R/2013/60854
Drdo

Foundation Laid for Recruitment Scam in DRDO

4 Comments
To,                                                                                                                  26rd  October 2013
Sh Avinash Chandra
DG (R&D),DRDO,SA to RM, Secretary DRDO
DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg
New Delhi -110105
 

Subject: Foundation Laid for Recruitment Scam in DRDO

CEPTAM was constituted with aim and objective to recruit the technical/ scientific/ admin allied man power, who can be the workforce in major national DRDO projects.

DRDO Hqrs made it a mockery and laughing object. DRDO has violated SRO from beginning of CEPTAM and there are several cases pending in CAT/High courts all across the India.

The recent recruitment drive tells a different story.

CEPTAM – 06 Advertisement Published in Employment News dated 04-10th May, 2013.

No of post advertised in various categories – 844

Approximately 5 lakhs application received (excluding hundreds of applications misplaced)

Approximately 1 lakh applications were rejected for silly reasons (example followed)

Approximately 2 lakhs candidates not able to appear for examination held on 25th August 2013

Approximately 3 lakhs candidates deprived by Sh Rajesh Goyal, Director, CEPTAM

It is very big question, how DRDO can give permission to Sh Rajesh Goyal, Director, CEPTAM to play with fundamental right of young citizen of India.

Please go through the following facts which clearly shows Sh Rajesh Goyal’s, Director, CEPTAM personal vested interest

  1. The SMS game – All interested candidates who wish to apply for DRDO Entry Test, are compulsorily required to register themselves on mobile no. 56677 of CEPTAM by sending a SMS in this format CEPTAM First choice of Exam City Code Post Code Date of Birth as ddmmyy NAME (Leaving a space between first, middle and last name) Example: CEPTAM 15 0112 231283 Rupesh Kumar Goyal (Name of Director’s son, it is example of pure chamchagiri environment of CEPTAM). Why this SMS system introduced by Sh Rajesh Goyal, Director, CEPTAM

Approximately 5 Lakhs application received and each applicant paid Rs 3 for each SMS registration.

Total money received by CEPTAM 15 Lakhs

The contract was cooked with M/s MILLENNIUM SYSTEMS  a computer peripheral supplier and well connected with Sh Rajesh Goyal since he was in ISSA. Anyone can verify these things with back record of firms supply orders vs with Sh Rajesh Goyal’s involvements. The M/s MILLENNIUM SYSTEMS website http://milsys.co.in is shown the order of client list. If 5 lakhs applicants registered the money was huge 15 Lakhs and in open market bulk SMS service providers 6 to 7 paisa /SMS so any one can work out the play in this contract. The CEPTAM  did not give this contract through DAVP shows the corruption angle.

  • No approval from competent authority to induct compulsory Mobile registration.
  • No tender floated by CEPTAM for bulk SMS service providing
    • No minimum 7 vendors address procurement policy of DRDO followed (Limited tender)
  • CEPTAM was not approached to DAVP empanelled SMS bulk service provider

M/s MILLENNIUM SYSTEMS – Provides -Selling of Computers & Related Peripherals such as :Range of Desktops / Servers – IBM / HP / COMPAQ / ACER etc.Range of POS and Kiosk / Billing Machines – Panasonic / Epson,Multimedia Products e.g. Video & Audio Processing Cards, Website designing and hosting. Man power Solutions / Recruitment Solutions /Data Entry. Annual maintenance contracts (AMC)

CEPTAM Website FAQ

Q-6.     Is it necessary to send application after registering through SMS?

A-6.     YES. Without registration number application will not be accepted. It is FIRST STEP for Applying for any post. (Note: Register for each post code separately if you are applying for more than one post code and get registration for each post code.)

Q-9.     I have submitted my application on prescribed format but could not register myself through SMS. Whether my application will be considered?

A-9.  NO; Applications received without registration number are liable to be rejected. Prior registration is mandatory for all posts, candidates applying for.

Application form the marked box for office use only
Application form the marked box for office use only

 

In above application form the marked box for office use only so hundreds of candidates not filled the SMS registration, result in this basis CEPTAM rejected their applications, who is responsible. Is DRDO ready to repay the money/time wasted by individuals?

Question is whether this kind of provision for like diesel mechanic posts and for SC/ST candidates who belong to rural areas and do not have access or are familiar with internet to verify or clear their issues, is allowed by government of India?

Example rejection of application due to SMS Registration

Example rejection of application due to SMS Registration
Example rejection of application due to SMS Registration

 

2.      The CEPTAM asked applications by ordinary post and other option were put in 2 boxes in both gates of Metcalf House and 1 box in front of CEPTAM entrance. There was no mechanism to acknowledge applications. So what happened to hundreds of hundreds candidates who spent their days in front of CEPTAM reception but could not get their admit cards because simply they were told that their application was not found. If so then CEPTAM should show their accounts about how many postal orders they enchased against each application. The total number of available applications & postal orders will never match. There is no other example in entire government of India or PSU, Banks where application acknowledgement mechanism is not applied. CEPTAM violated fundamental right of young citizens of India.

Example  application – not received /found

Example application – not received /found
Example application – not received /found

Example  application – not received /found

Example application – not received /found
Example application – not received /found

3.   Approximately 2 lakhs candidates could not appear due to wrongly assigned examination centres. It is not possible that the huge number of candidates themselves asked for the centre, this whole thing is deliberately done by CEPTAM on the direction of Sh Rajesh Goyal or otherwise it is clearly proved that he is incompetent to handle such a task. Please find some examples of admit cards issued by CEPTAM.

post5    In Application centre city code clearly mentioned – 09 (Delhi NCR)

Admit Card centre city code given – Ranchi (Code -24)
Admit Card centre city code given – Ranchi (Code -24)

Admit Card centre city code given – Ranchi (Code -24)

In Application centre city code asked – 09 (Delhi NCR) Given Kanpur (Code 16)
In Application centre city code asked – 09 (Delhi NCR) Given Kanpur (Code 16)

In Application centre city code asked – 09 (Delhi NCR) Given Kanpur (Code 16)

In Application centre city code asked – 09 (Delhi NCR) Given Ahmedabad (Code 02)
In Application centre city code asked – 09 (Delhi NCR) Given Ahmedabad (Code 02)

In Application centre city code asked – 09 (Delhi NCR) Given Ahmedabad (Code 02)

Wrong date of birth, wrong post code entered by data entry firms
Wrong date of birth, wrong post code entered by data entry firms

In Application centre city code asked – 09 (Delhi NCR) Given Ahmedabad (Code 02)4.

4.       Although CEPTAM corrected some centre errors and provided that list on the website but numbers (First list -89, http://drdo.gov.in/drdo/ceptam/CityChangeList.pdf second list 54 http://drdo.gov.in/drdo/ceptam/CityAndPCDlist.pdf) were few in respect to the numbers of candidates who were not able to appear i.e. 2 Lakhs.

5.         There are many example in which any one can see, how Sh Rajesh Goyal, Director chose data entry firms who played with the future of young India.

Examples

post10

Photo placed wrongly by data entry firm and Centre wrong
Photo placed wrongly by data entry firm and Centre wrong
Photo Lalita and name in admit card Rajnish Kumar
Photo Lalita and name in admit card Rajnish Kumar

6.       In one of my RTIs, I have requested information regarding selection boards’ expert members, because it is observed that Sh Rajesh Goyal, Director, CEPTAM engaged his wife, his co-brother and other blood relation persons as expert in different selection boards all over India. Like Dr Madhu (Madhuri) Goyal , Mr M C Goyal,  Mr Sekher Gupta,  Mr Anupam Gupta . The act of Sh Rajesh Goyal, Director, CEPTAM assigning his relatives as experts violated the laid down rules CCS rules. No prior approval from competent authority was taken in this regards. This act can give liberty to do manipulation in recruitment. My RTI dated 2nd May 2013 and CPIO, CEPTAM Reply is enclosed here with for your ready reference. (Assessment Boards and Recruitment Board constituted in the year 2012) This mechanism is also following in recent recruitment drive. (RTI request and reply of CPIO, CEPTAM enclosed herewith for your ready reference.)

7.        Please find enclosed list of the name and phone numbers of some candidates from whom you can visualize how CEPTAM, DRDO played with the future of young Indians for their own vested interest. (List enclosed as annexure)

Sir, above all examples are enough evidences to investigate the CEPTAM-06 recruitment drive, beside this lot of complaint already received by honorable Defence Minister and various authorities. The CEPTAM director putting his efforts to diluting and burring the subject matter. It is requested kindly do needful urgently for the future of young citizens of India.

Sir, please put your all sincere efforts to stop the corruption in CEPTAM. The approximately 3 lakhs youths are waiting for your honest decision to get fair chance of selection. Do something to maintain prestige of DRDO.

Regards

 Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur
Dehradun-248008
Uttarakhand
Cell No- 9411114879, Landline- 0135-2787750
e-mail- prabhudoon@gmail.com, website – www.corruptionindrdo.com

 

Enclosed

  1. Copy of my RTI request to CPIO,CEPTAM dated 2nd May 2013
  2. Copy my RTI request to CEPTAM dated 9th June 2013
  3. List of the name and phone numbers of some candidates