Tag Archives: DEAL

Drdo

RTI- CAIR- PC Procurement PAC basis – Dr KD Nayak, DG, (DRDO’s Gem Manipulator)

10 Comments
To,                                                                                               17th September 2014
Dr. RB Sharma, CPIO,
DRDO HQ, Min. of Defence,
DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg,
New Delhi-110011                             

 

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of procurement of PCs from M/s Tata Power by CAIR, DRDO, Bangalore. To favor M/S Tata Power demands raised against the laid down rule of PM-2006 approved purchased manual of DRDO, The procurement was done in PAC. It is not understood how universal available Personal Computer can become PAC item. In the name of secrecy exemptions are being obtained for publishing in Central Public Procurement Portal (CPP).

As per PM-2006 para 7.8 – SINGLE TENDER WITH PAC: This system will be adopted in respect of

Following cases on certification by the Director of Lab/Estt that no other Make/brand can be used.

(a) Proprietary articles which are monopoly product of a single manufacturer. If possible, a certificate in this regard may be obtained from the concerned firm, before Director Signs the PAC.

The DG involved in this procurement is Dr. KD Nayak who is best manipulator in such kind of procurement please refer to

CBI report No.PE-3(A) /2001 of DEAL, DRDO, Dehradun-Two special PARA of report is

The recommendation of the TPC was approved by Director and the statement of case was prepared for obtaining sanction for approval of purchase from competetent authority i.e SA to RM as in case of single tender the FINANCIAL competence of Director of Lab is restricted to Rs 1 Lakh. The statement of case put up DRDO under the signature of Dr.AS Bains and Dr.KD Nayak dt 7th Oct 1997 sate that the requirement of………

The deal for the purchase was approved by the then SA to RM Dr.APJ Abul Kalam. However the only bone of connection is fact that when the supplier asked for change of nomenclature and replacing the word down convertor with integrated circuit, Dr AS Bains, director of the lab had approved of the TPC recommendation and have not referred this matter of change of nomenclature to SA to RM as the deal was approved by him.

The care procured Rs 40-50 thousand PC in nearly 5.5 Lakhs with following demands.

  1. 14SSD228 – 6 March 2014-    Rs   9580774.00- M/S Tata Power
  2. 14SSD237 –19 March 2014-   Rs   9881360.00- M/S Tata Power
  3. 14SSD136 – 26 August 2014- Rs 58051500.00- M/S Tata Power
  1. Please provide proprietary certificate given by M/S Tata Power.
  2. Copy of statement case where justification mentioned about proprietary case.
  3. List of TPC members who approved the above case.

The above case is the example of corrupt practice followed by DRDO in the name of secrecy government India can verify from the expert of DOE.

Regards
Prabhu Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur,
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website www.corruptionindrdo.com

Registration Number  MODEF/R/2014/61715

Drdo

PCDA- CVO- Fake Diploma Business in DRDO

8 Comments
To                                                                                                16th September 2014
Shri K K Singh, IDAS
Addl.CDA & CVO
O/o PCDA (R&D), West Block-V
R K PURAM
NEW DELHI- 110066

Subject: Complaint regarding qualification entry in service books & recruitment through Limited Departmental Competitive Examination (LDCE) without having required qualifications in DEAL, DRDO, Raipur Road, Dehradun.

Sir,

With reference to above following individuals serving in DEAL, DRDO, Raipur, Dehradun in different post did not have recognized diploma /degree in respective field. The DEAL management unconstitutionally added their qualification without proper verification and violated CCS (CCA) rules 1965. The added qualifications in service book of individuals were duly audited by JCDA on regular basis.

In one RTI reply according to DRDO Hqrs the individuals submitted their respective qualification certificates are not recognized by apex bodies of Government of India. RTI enclosed for ready reference.

It is requested, the cases of following individuals of DEAL, DRDO, Raipur Road, Dehradun may please be investigate / verified as per norms of laid down rules of GOI and take appropriate action to stop their illegal financial benefits with immediate effect and also investigate the role of JCDA, Dehradun for their audit approvals in these individuals cases and fix their responsibilities on the subject matter.

deal fake diploma

Regards

Prabhu  Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur,
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website www.corruptionindrdo.com

Enclosed: RTI reply dated 20 August 2013 of DRDO Hqrs mentioned regarding the reorganization of individuals’ qualifications

FA Reply1
FA Reply1

fareplypage2

List from DEAL, DRDO, Dehradun
List from DEAL, DRDO, Dehradun
Drdo

Narendra Modi’s dream project ‘Swach Bharat’ and DRDO

Leave a comment

स्वच्छ    भारत – स्वच्छ   डी आर डी ओ – स्वच्छ डी एम एस आर डी ई

Dear Sh Avinash Chander Ji

You’re beloved Dr A K Saxena’s  concern about स्वच्छडी एमएसआरडीई,

Please look following photo feature of cleanliness of DMSRDE toilets. Dr A K Saxena has no time to look in to the hygienic condition of DMSRDE campus. The staff responsible for cleanliness engaged for personal service of his aides.

This is not the only case, same state is in DEAL also Sh R C Agarwal has no time to see these affairs because he use to out of station on TD for more than 90% time. In DEAL the officials even lodge written complaint of broken door of toilets but no response….

Hope you can send directive to your beloved aides to look in to the hygienic conditions of lab since you have   11960 crores of budget.

 

Regards
www.corruptionindro.com  

DMSRDE Toilets
DMSRDE Toilets conditions
DMSRDE Toilets2
DMSRDE Toilets conditions
Drdo

Sh R C Agarwal your Tea was not accepted by Uttarakhand Police, Sub Inspector B P Singh’s report misfired

Leave a comment

Today evening around 18:15 hrs SSP, Dehradun marked Sh Jagdish Kumar, T O ‘C’s request to CO, City, Dehradun for proper investigation for action in atrocity against Sh R K Agrawal, Principal Associated Director, Outstanding scientist, Scientist ‘H’ (although promotion got with false claim of Project NARAD), which was duly authenticated  by  another Agrawal i.e. Director, DEAL, Sh R C Agarwal who was got two service extensions as he is having international stature  as DoPT criteria for service extension beyond age of 62 years is only for those scientists or medical professional who possessed international stature in their respective field.

GOD and Sh Avinash Chander, DG DRDO only knows the international stature of Sh R C Agarwal, Director, DEAL or may be Sh Avinash Chander impressed his false authentication capability.

Procured SDR 3000 or SDR 5000 or developed prototype of DEAL SDR will be use for museum which was build  by Dr S Pillai in Brahmos campus. Like Kalam Gallery, Pillai Gallery……..SDR gallery

Now Sh R C Agarwal will make another special Tea for CO, City, Dehradun to protect his beloved Agarwal, if CO, City, Dehradun not visit DEAL campus than he has to take special Tea in thermos to CO, City office.

All the best

Uncategorized

DRDO lab Directors expert in manipulations whether it is Software Radio or Atrocities on SC/ST

Leave a comment

An official of DEAL, DRDO Sh. Jagdish Kumar, Technical Officer ‘C’ reported to SSP, Dehradun against the crime committed by Sh. R K Agarwal, Scientist ‘H’ Principal Associate Director, (Farzi Designation because as per RTI information there is no such gazette notification), DEAL.

Thanks to RTI Act 2005 which is strong and effective weapon against corrupt officials.

RTI revealed that Sh R C Agarwal fully supported and extended all his official powers to protect his Agarwal bandhu Sh. R K Agarwal, Sc ‘H’

  1. SSP, Dehradun same day i.e. 4/6/2014 sent Sh. Jagdish Kumar, Technical Officer ‘C’ to Thana Raipur for inquiry.
  2. SHO, Raipur Thana assigned the task to Sub Inspector B P Singh on same day i.e. 4/6/2014
  3. Sub Inspector B P Singh did not look into the matter seriously. After many requests he visited DEAL, DRDO campus on 3/7/2014 and met Sh. R K Agarwal in his office, in the company of Sh K Sivakumar, Sc ‘G’, Dr R S Pundir,  Sc ’G’, Sh Dilip Kumar, Sc ’F’, Sh Atul Dev, Sc ‘F’, Sh VVS Panwar, TO ‘C’, working as Security officer, Sh Balwant, Senior Security Assistant.
  4. Sub Inspector B P Singh submitted his investigation report with conclusion that matter is not worthy of further inquiry and is not fit for registration of FIR.
  5. As per RTI reply it clearly shows Sub Inspector B P Singh sent his final report on 3/7/2014.

Actual facts

  1. Sub Inspector B P Singh visited DEAL on 7/7/2014 and met Sh. R K Agarwal in the chamber of Sh RC Agarwal and collected few useless, unrelated paper, un-certified papers which he annexed with his final report, he forgot the date of final report i.e. 3/7/2014.
  2.  Sub Inspector B P Singh called Sh Jagdish Kumar, applicant on 8/7/2014 at 12.00 hrs and wrote down his statement; again he forgot the date of final report i.e. 3/7/2014.
  3. Per Sub Inspector B P Singh’s report he has not asked any question to Sh R K Agrawal about the allegation made by sh Jagdish Kumar with certified proof of Sh R K Agrawal’s act and deeds, the person who was harassed  by Sh R K Agrawal
  4. Sh RC Agarwal managed the show by offering tea to Sub Inspector B P Singh or like as he already authenticated Sh R K Agarwal false claim of showing association in prestigious project ‘NARAD’ for his promotion to Sc H and because of Sh RC Agarwal illegal act of nepotism so many senior deserving scientist not get their due credits,
  5. Sub Inspector B P Singh’s report is false and produced under pressure of Sh RC Agarwal & Sh R K Agarwal but they forgot that truth cannot be hidden by any means.
  6. The CC TV footage and DEAL official’s are witness of Sub Inspector B P Singh’s visit on 7/7/2014, poor Sub Inspector B P Singh does not know the Sh RC Agarwal & Sh R K Agarwal’s capability of manipulation skills, they are fooling the country men for 100 crores project, Sub Inspector is mere insect for these duo.rep to SSP 25 aug 2014 rep to SSP 25 aug 20141 rep to SSP 25 aug 20142rti reply by policerti reply by police1rti reply by police1.1rti reply by police2rti reply by police3rti reply by police4rti reply by police5rti reply by police6rti reply by police7rti reply by police8rti reply by police9rti reply by police10rti reply by police11rti reply by police12rti reply by police13
Drdo

RTI- MOD – DRDO is weakest link for Spying.

Leave a comment
To                                                                                            30th July 2014
Sh A. M. Manichan,
Under Secretary (IC-IV), CPIO,
Ministry of Defence,
Department of Defence,
Sena Bhavan, New Delhi

Hello,

Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005 in respect of my letter to Sh A K Antony, Defence Minister dated 11th February 2014 subjected- DRDO is weakest link for Spying.

  1. Date of receipt of above referred letter to Defence Minister office.
  2. Copy of remark on above referred letter by Defence Minister or official of Defence Ministry.
  3. Copy of reply received from DRDO in respect of above referred letter, if not then copy of any action taken so far by Raksha Mantri office on above referred letter.
Regards
Prabhu  Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008
Phone – 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website – www.corruptionindrdo.com

Enclosed :

  1. Copy of my letter dated 11th February 2014 subjected- DRDO is weakest link for Spying, address to honorable defence minister
  2. Copy of education certificate submitted by Mrs Rita
  3. Copy of Performa application submitted by DEAL, DRDO, Dehradun in respect of compensatory appointment of Mrs Rita

Online RTI Registration Number      MODEF/R/2014/61359

Drdo

RTI- Diploma/Degree holder obtained through distance education -entertaining in DRTC assessment

1 Comment
To,                                                                                               28th July 2014
Dr. RB Sharma, CPIO
DRDO HQ, Min. of Defence
DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg
New Delhi-110011                             

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of verifications of Diploma/Degree holder obtained through distance education of DRDO officials. It is observed that there are no laid down procedures following by DRDO labs/Estt for considering such Diploma/Degree obtained through distance education like in DEAL, Dehradun not considering such Diploma/Degree holder employees for LDCE nor endorsing in their service book. Other way round in DRTC assessment these Diploma/ Degree are considering by the assessment board. As per DOP letter No DOP/01/ 03500/ Lumpsum/M/01 dated 11th March 2014, DOP admitted that there no verifications were done for these Diploma/ Degree holder officials of DRDO. In RTI reply letter No RTI/02/2091/F/2013/0016 dated 20 August 2013 DRDO Hqrs accepted that seven officials of DEAL, Dehradun does not possess the recognize diploma and even not from recognized center. In view of this following information is requested.

  1. Copy of approval of competent authority for entertaining such Diploma/Degree holder employees for DRTC assessment 2014.
  2. Copies of DoPT approval for continue such Diploma/Degree holder employees in service.
  3. Provide the number of court cases admitted in various courts filed by Diploma/Degree (obtained through distance education ) holder employees of DRDO in last five years from March 2009-April 2014

Note: the requested information is not come under exemption of schedule -II of RTI Act 2005. Since, March 2014 end DRDO stopped to provide information under shadow of exemption. It is requested in above para-one of this request it is clear cut mentioned the corruption/ favoritism/ abuse of power, so before denial of information your point wise explanation is required that the matter not pertain under corruption.

Regards

Prabhu  Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur,
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website www.corruptionindrdo.com

Enclosed: RTI Replies of DRDO, DOP letter No DOP/01/ 03500/ Lumpsum/M/01 dated 11th March 2014

Registration Number        MODEF/R/2014/61350Drdo RTI reply on fake degree 1Drdo RTI reply on fake degree 2Drdo RTI reply on fake degree 3RTI reply drdo hq fake degree12 marchfake degree dop letterfake degree dop letter page2

Drdo

What happened if you are in hit list of Director?

Leave a comment

In DRDO there is no HR policy, although the post of CC R&D HR and a big HR directorate under him working in DRDO Hqrs but they are working with sole aim and object that how to execute and manage the unethical/ unconstitutional demands of DG, DRDO to all establishment heads.

Generally these demands are to adjust their beloved by any means like Smt. T Chandra Bhanu or Ms Geetha or Ms Swati Srivastva or Ms Dolly Bansal recruitment cases. Some cases come out from the four walls of DRDO but inside DRDO everyone knows this practice is continue carryon in DRDO by so called DRDO,HRD like adjustment of Commander Patel, Ex- SA’s daughter, CEPTAM Chairman’s son, Ex- Scientist ‘G’ in DEAL who was head of HRD, DEAL adjust his son Sh Saket Jain with all farzi certificates.

It is very well proven DRDO HRD can do any dam thing under wish of their AAKAS whether harassment of any individual from class IV employee to Scientist ‘H’. There is no moral exists in DRDO, HRD n numbers of examples available of transfers cases, manipulating in ACR/APAR’s, Awards to incompetents, authentication of false claims, list is too long.

The following case of Sh M R Gupta, TO ‘C’ is a clear cut case of dictatorship of DRDO officials, several years torture now Sh M R Gupta become chronic depression case.

Sh M R Gupta joined as JSA-II in 1979 in GTRE, DRDO, Bangalore, transferred to IRDE, Dehradun and subsequently joined DEAL as SSA in October 1987.

Up to 1986 his ACR’s was very good and enjoyed regular growth, but the day when then Director, IRDE Dr O P Nijhawan raised his eyebrow and put him in hit list, the bad days started and Sh M R Gupta’s service journey till date exposes the DRDO HR policy.

His 1987 ACR reflects the real bossism of Mr O P Nijhawan number dropped to 62

As IETE graduate Sh M R Gupta applied for the post of Assistant executive engineer in I & B through UPSC and got selected but Dr O P Nijhawan not supplied his 1987 ACR so he was deprived to get post.

Dr. O P Nijhawan’s effect also passed to DEAL and it was always made confirm that any advantage should not passed to Sh M R Gupta,

Sh M R Gupta qualified 9 times LDCE examination of Scientist ‘B’, the RTI revealed that RAC maintained the boss wishes. No one imagine the act of RAC officials.

Sh M R Gupta‘s ACR/ APAR of 1995 and 96 was found blank.

The 2004 ACR/APAR was reviewed by Sh Y P Sehgal, Ex Sc ‘G’ illegally as Sh M R Gupta was never worked with him and put adverse remark “ One disciplinary case is with DRDO Hqrs”  and remark was duly approved by the Director, Sh Ashok Sen and it was not even communicated to Sh M R Gupta.

DRDO having very common scenarios that if one official is in hit list then all chamchas never leave any chance to fix him to make happy the boss.

In case of Sh M R Gupta same thing happened, several attempts were done to harm, Dr. B S Jassal throw his wife’s medical bill for unforeseen reason and exchanged heat argument, in those argument frustrated Sh M R Gupta told him that I will jumped from the building, very next movement the explanation call with initiation of disciplinary action raised against him.

In 2004 Sh Mahakar Singh, Sc ‘G’ also demonstrated the extreme loyalty and one incident he scrimmage with Sh M R Gupta in his office room, next moment the room was sealed and an ION was served and an inquiry was constituted in a hurry and stage was set for dismiss Sh M R Gupta. By grace of God Sh M R Gupta approached local police and case was registered, subsequently after lower court to high court and again to lower court Sh Mahakar Singh rendered his apology in front of Session Judge, Dehradun and matter was closed.

This is not a single case, the HR policy ingest lot of DRDO officials by heart attack, High blood pressure, increasing number of bye passes, inserting stunts, depressions or exodus.

You can rate DRDO HR policy 5 stars, 4 stars, 3 stars, 2 stars or 1 star after going through the following papers.

MR. M R Gupta's 1987's ACR
MR. M R Gupta’s 1987’s ACR
MR M R Gupta ACR 1987
MR M R Gupta ACR 1987
Amazing score card of LDCE, RAC
Amazing score card of LDCE, RAC can anyone believe the DRDO HR policy

LDCE score details

Fast act of Sh Ashok Sen if he was right the why Sh Mahakar Singh rendered his apology in court for same incident
Fast act of Sh Ashok Sen
if he was right the why Sh Mahakar Singh rendered his apology in court for same incident
The Sh Ashok Sen's white washing team Sh.P C Sharma, CAO, Dr.B.S. Jassal, Sc 'F', Sh K.Sivakumar, Sc 'F', Sf Ajay Malik, Sc 'E'
The Sh Ashok Sen’s white washing team Sh.P C Sharma, CAO, Dr.B.S. Jassal, Sc ‘F’, Sh K.Sivakumar, Sc ‘F’, Sf Ajay Malik, Sc ‘E’
Sh Mahakar Singh rendered his apology in court
Sh Mahakar Singh rendered his apology in court
Sh Mahakar Singh rendered his apology in court
Sh Mahakar Singh rendered his apology in court

mrg letters

mrg letters1mrg letters2

Health condition of Mr M R Gupta or DRDO HR policy
Health condition of Mr M R Gupta or DRDO HR policy

mr gupta Max

 

Drdo

RTI is only weapon to correct the mind of so called Dictators of DRDO

2 Comments

Dear friends of DRDO,

Following inputs being published for awareness of all DRDO officials. All of them are experiencing the arbitrariness of entire DRDO‘s Lab directors. Every year you all are silent spectators of this arbitrary conduct of the respective lab directors when DRDS or DRTC promotion’s results are declared.

Few days’ frustration looks are seen on the faces of few but again they indulge in the same cycle. If you seriously observe the health condition of DRDO scientists, this time every year a bitter sip of humiliation distorted the life and health conditions of each one.

It is not because of their failure in assessment. It is because of the success of those incompetent / working on non-scientific assignments.

Earlier in days of beginning of 90’s this kind of push pull was not done openly or in a big way. One or two cases were seen in entire DRDO, but nowadays Directors, New born DG’s, DRDO Hqrs beloved boys are fully creating dadagiri and clearing/helping incompetent and ignoring all those who are seriously involved in scientific research and development.

Although the exodus ratio dropout because of two reasons. One, the world economic recession and two, the VIth pay commission hike in pay package of scientists, but this frustration directly affected their output and as well as their daily life. The enthusiasm of young scientists is lost in DRDO and now they are involved to mint money in all means. An example would be like the LTC 80 scam of Metcalf house is a clear signal of the mindset of the new generation of DRDO team.

The following papers are the example of dadagiri of DRDO lab directors. Sh. M R Gupta, TO ‘C’ was joined DRDO in 9 Nov 1979 as JSA – II, subsequently transferred IRDE in 1981 and in 1987 in DEAL, he is IETE graduate (1987), presently he is working as TO ‘C’ in DEAL since 2008. As per normal conditions he is supposed to get a promotion in 2001.

Sh. M R Gupta rested his ACR/APAR through RTI in 2013 from 1987 to 2013 after a long battle CIC ordered to supply all ACR to DRDO on 4th March 2014 vide File No.CIC/LS/A/2013/001815/RM dated 2014 “DECISION – The Commission directed the CPIO to provide copies of ACRs for the period 1987-2007 as sought by the appellant within three weeks from the date of receipt of this order, free of cost”

Now see in followin enclosed document, Sh M R Gupta shocked to see that his two year ACR/ APAR of 1995 and 96 was blank and in 2004 ACR/APAR was reviewed by Sh Y P Sehgal, Ex Sc ‘G’ illegally as Sh M R Gupta was never worked with him and put adverse remark “ One disciplinary case is with DRDO Hqrs”  and remark was duly approved by the Director, Sh Ashok Sen and best part of this RTI revealed that it was not even communicated to Sh M R Gupta.

This illegal unethical act done by Sh. Ashok Sen, then Director, DEAL was perfect example of DRDO work atmosphere, which proves that the absolute power made DRDO Lab’s director became autocratic/dictator/tyrant, etc.

This is not the only case you will find this kind of act in the entire DRDO. RTI’s also revealed that in several cases white fluid applied in ACR/APAR, tempering of marks in any stage even after in final stage at DRDO Hqrs.

It is requested to all suffering DRDO officials to please file RTIs with reference to supreme court order of Justice Markandey Katju, in Devi dutt Vs Union of India  (CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7631 OF 2002) to confirm your ACR/APAR marks and comments.

One more important observation is that these DRDO Lab’s director also authenticating false claim of work to their beloved incompetent scientists.

Hope with the following example you all will review your promotion profile and analyze the possible flaw in the process of DRDO’s promotion mechanism.

Regards

mr gupta ACR1-2004mr gupta ACR2-2004

mr gupta ACR3-2004

To,                                                                                                           5th May 2014
Dr. Sangeeta Khare, CPIO
DEAL, DRDO
Raipur Road, DEHRADUN-248001             

Madam,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect to my ACR/APAR of year 2004. Recently on 11th April 2014 CPIO, CEPTAM send me ACR/APAR from 1987 -2007. In 2014 ACR/APAR assessing officer was Sh K Siva Kumar, Sc ‘F’ and reviewing officer Sh Y P Sehgal, Sc ‘G’(copy enclosed). Sh Y P Sehgal, Sc ‘G’ reviewing officer put adverse remark in para 5 –“one disciplinary case is with DRDO Hqrs”.

  1. Provide the certified copy of disciplinary case which was pending in DRDO Hqrs against me as mentioned by RO, Sh Y P Sehgal, Sc ‘G’.
  2. Present status of disciplinary case which was mentioned by RO Sh Y P Sehgal, Sc ‘G’.
  3. Provide the certified copy of communication letter of above adverse remark.
  4. Provide the DO part order/ION on the basis RO mentioned in APAR/ACR para 2 that I have served under him form 1st June 2004 to 31st December 2004.

Note. The information sought for concerns related to my life and health condition. I am in mental agony, my health is deteriorating day by day, and necessary medical certificates from Fortis & Max Hospital are enclosed for your ready reference. It is requested the information should be provided within forty-eight hours of the receipt of the request, so that my health will improve sharply.

Enclosed:-

  1. Photocopy of APAR/ACR of 2004
  2. Medical Certificate of Fortis Hospital, Chandigarh
  3. Medical Certificate of Max Hospital, Dehradun

Thanking You

(M. R. Gupta)
             T O ‘C’
21- Bank Colony, Adhoiwala
Raipur Road, DEHRADUN – 2248001
 
Rs 10 fee is deposited cashmr gupta rti DEAL reply