by Pranav Kulkarni | New Delhi | Published on:April 1, 2015 1:49 am – The Indian Express
Two months after it sacked Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) chief Avinash Chander, the government has denied extension to a top DRDO scientist. Bikash Bhattacharya, who was on his first extension as the director of Pune-based High Energy Materials Research Laboratory (HEMRL), retired Tuesday. Besides him, the government in the past six months has denied extension to at least three top DRDO scientists.
While Chander was sacked unceremoniously citing the need for appointing younger scientists, the Modi government has on several platforms made public its intentions to streamline DRDO.
Sources in DRDO said the HEMRL director’s extension was recommended by Chander and was considered by the Appointments Committee of Cabinet (ACC). It was, however, rejected by the government “about 10 days ago”. Bhattacharya was formerly associated with ISRO.
Bhattacharya, 62, who took over as director, HEMRL on September 11, 2011 was already on one extension after he completed 60 years on March 23, 2013. As per DRDO’s existing promotion policy, two extensions are permitted for a tenure of two years after the scientist completes 60 years, the retirement age.
Bhattacharya is the fourth scientist to have been denied extension by the Modi government in the past six months. Others who were denied extension are directors of Defence Research & Development Establishment (DRDE), Defence Bioengineering and Electromedical Laboratory (DEBEL) and Electronics & Radar Development Establishment (LRDE) — M P Kaushik, V C Padaki and Venkatnarayana Raju, respectively.
The denial of extensions by the Modi government has reversed the trend of the UPA government which was criticised for making extensions a “norm” instead of an “exception”. In 2012 for instance, 11 top scientists were on extension at various laboratories across the country.
Nobody is getting transfer from drl due to unlawful behavior of Dr vijay Veer and previous director Dr Lokendra singh . peoples are going to CAT . but some chamcha are getting both transfer and outstanding promotion like DR Anurag Pandey Sc C joined drl at 31/08/09 and got twice transfer (document attached) first from DRL to DRDE and then DRDE to nagpur near is home town in public interest .Even he did not complete his tenure of 3 year as mentioned in his joining letter (attached). because he developed some fake product like TERMICLEAR which is carcinogenic (AMES test positive) also got scientist of the year award in 2010. he also developed herbal Painout in which there is nothing Herbal. he also got Outstanding promotion in 4 years.
jay ho chamchagiri ki.
Received corruptionindrdo.com – Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 5:34 PM
जागरण ब्यूरो, नई दिल्ली : रासायनिक हमले व हथियारों की जांच के लिए खरीदे गए विदेशी उपकरण सेना की फांस बन गए हैं। सारा पेंच उपकरणों की खरीद से पहले और बाद में कराए गए परीक्षणों के नतीजों को लेकर है। कंपनी और सेना मुख्यालय के बीच सौदे की परफार्मेस बैंक गारंटी को मामले के निपटारे तक बढ़ाने पर रजामंदी बन पाई है।
सूत्रों के मुताबिक उपकरणों की खरीद से पहले अंतरराष्ट्रीय प्रयोगशाला में हुए परीक्षणों को स्वीकार कर लिया गया था। हालांकि, बाद में सेना ने रक्षा अनुसंधान और विकास संगठन की प्रयोगशाला (डीआरडीओ) में भी इसकी जांच की। डीआरडीओ के नतीजे ही इस विवाद की जड़ हैं, क्योंकि इसके बाद ही सेना ने उपकरणों को तापमान और आद्र्रता के पैमानों पर निष्प्रभावी करार दिया।
उपकरण निर्माता फिनलैंड की कंपनी इनवायरॉनिक्स डीआरडीओ की प्रयोगशाला में हुए परीक्षण को चुनौती दे रही है। कंपनी अंतरराष्ट्रीय प्रयोगशाला में इसके परीक्षण को लेकर भी हीला-हवाली कर रही है। यह सवाल अहम है कि आखिर किन परीक्षणों के आधार पर उपकरणों की खरीद को हरी झंडी दी गई। साथ ही खरीद से पहले डीआरडीओ प्रयोगशाला में परीक्षण क्यों नहीं किए गए?
इस सवालों पर सेना मुख्यालय की चुप्पी के बीच करोड़ों रुपये की खरीद अब बेकार हो गई है। भारत ने 2009 और 2010 में करोड़ों रुपये की लागत से जहरीले रसायनों का पता लगाने वाले उपकरण खरीदे थे।
Budgetary Priceapproximately $9,500
Purchase Price – Rs 100000/- each in bulk purchase (more than $ 16000/each)
Army has purchased instrument ICAD Chempro 100i (Qty: 999 No’s, Make: Environics) against contract nos B/28704/NBC-4C/ICAD/GS/WE-6 Dated 23 Jun 2009 and B/28704/NBC-4C/Option/ICAD/GS/WE-6 dated 26 Mar 2010 for approximately 100 Crore (INR). This instrument detects the chemical warfare agents and is of utmost importance for the defence services. Having cleared the payment after the delivery, it was found that all these instruments failed to perform as per the specification and have technical problems. It is evident from the letter enclosed that performance related issues were raised in Nov 2012 and since then no action has been taken. Few officials are trying to cover up the issue by changing the specification instead of taking 100 Crore back.
As per the information gathered from the sources, these instruments were first purchased by M P Kaushik from DRDE Gwalior (A DRDO Laboratory and Nodal Agency in Chemical Warfare). Satisfactory working certificate were given to the company and payment was cleared. Later Army gave the contract. It seems that with the help of M P Kaushik few official of army has executed this act.
Environics’s reply regarding non function of Chempro100iEnvironics’s reply regarding non function of Chempro 100iProf. Dr M P Kaushik,Director,DRDE, DRDO, Gwalior
विषय : 60 साल उपरांत सेवा विस्तार के नियम का विभिन्न संस्थानों द्वारा अयोग्य, अक्षम व्यक्तियों की संस्तुति कर दुरूपयोग करने के सन्दर्भ में
माननीय श्री प्रधानमंत्री जी आपने इस महत्वपूर्ण विषय में ध्यान देकर इस दुरूपयोग रोकने के लिए आदेश भी दिए परन्तु यह बड़े खेद का विषय है कि कार्मिक विभाग आपके आदेशो को समुचित प्रभाव से कार्यान्वित करने में ढीलम ढाल कर रहे।
डीआरडीओ के श्री अविनाश चन्दर, वैज्ञानिक सलाहकार द्वारा अयोग्य, अक्षम व्यक्तियों की संस्तुति करना लगातार जारी है। डी आर डी ई, ग्वालियर के निदेशक महोदय प्रोफ डा एम पी कौशिक जोकि इस 31 अक्टूबर 2014 को रिटायर हो रहे हैं वह अभी दिल्ली में श्री अविनाश चन्दर के चरण वंदना में लगे है कि किसी भी तरह उनको सेवा विस्तार दिला दे या फिर कोई चेयर, फेलोशिप, कॉन्ट्रैक्ट या कुछ भी दिला दो।
बदले में वो क्या कर सकते है उसकी एक झलक देखिये, एन बी सी वारफेयर के हेड होने के नाते डा एम पी कौशिक ने एक विदेशी यंत्र (ICAD Chempro100i Make: Environics) जोकि विषाक्त केमिकलो का तुरंत प्रभाव से पता लगा लेता था का आयात करा और उसकी गुणवत्ता को देख कर सेना ने 999 संख्या में 100 करोड़ रुपये की इस यंत्र की खरीद जोकि सामान्य से दुगनी से ज्यादा कीमत थी। यंत्र की सेना में विदेश से आप्पूर्ति के बाद पता चला है की यह यंत्र हमारे देश की क्लाइमेट कंडीशन के लिए उपयुक्त नहीं है और काम नहीं कर रहा।
इस यंत्र की बड़ी इतनी संख्या में बड़ी हुई कीमतों में खरीददारी से किसको फायदा मिला और कहां कहां तक बटा यह तो सिर्फ डा एम पी कौशिक ही बता सकते है।
ऐसे लोगो की सेवा विस्तार के लिए संतुस्ती आना ही एक गंभीर बात है। इस से संस्तुति करने वालो की मंशा व् नियत पर भी सवाल उठता है।
आपकी निरक्षण व् कार्यवाही के लिए कुछ तथ्य सलग्न है।
आशा है की इन तथ्यों की सपूर्ण जाँच करवा कर देश के बहुमूल्य पैसो का दोहन करने वालो के खिलाफ उचित कार्यवाही का जल्द से जल्द जाँच का आदेश देंगे।
Enclosed details: Purchase background of ICAD Chempro 100i,, Make: Environics
Budgetary Priceapproximately $9,500
Purchase Price – Rs 100000/- each in bulk purchase (more than $ 16000/each)
Army has purchased instrument ICAD Chempro 100i (Qty: 999 No’s, Make: Environics) against contract nos B/28704/NBC-4C/ICAD/GS/WE-6 Dated 23 Jun 2009 and B/28704/NBC-4C/Option/ICAD/GS/WE-6 dated 26 Mar 2010 for approximately 100 Crore (INR). This instrument detects the chemical warfare agents and is of utmost importance for the defence services. Having cleared the payment after the delivery, it was found that all these instruments failed to perform as per the specification and have technical problems. It is evident from the letter enclosed that performance related issues were raised in Nov 2012 and since then no action has been taken. Few officials are trying to cover up the issue by changing the specification instead of taking 100 Crore back.
As per the information gathered from the sources, these instruments were first purchased by M P Kaushik from DRDE Gwalior (A DRDO Laboratory and Nodal Agency in Chemical Warfare). Satisfactory working certificate were given to the company and payment was cleared. Later Army gave the contract. It seems that with the help of M P Kaushik few official of army has executed this act.
Environics’s reply regarding non function of Chempro100i
Environics’s reply regarding non function of Chempro 100i
Technology Evaluation Report Environics USA Inc. ChemPro 100 Hand-Held Chemical Detector By- Tricia Derringer, Thomas Kelly, Dale Folsom, Robert Krile, and Zachary Willenberg, Battelle, 505 King Avenue, Columbus, OH 43201 and Eric Koglin Task Order Project Officer National Homeland Security Research Center Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 944 East Harmon Ave. Las Vegas, NV 89119
To Date 16th October 2014Hon’bleShri Narendra Modi,Prime Minister of India,Room No -152, PMO, South Block,New Delhi-110011
Subject : Request to utilized scientific potential of Dr. A.K. Singh, DOP, DRDO HQ to Lab/Estt under Life Sciences Cluster
Hon’ble Sir,
Human Resource is an asset of an organisation and proper utilisation and deployment of its HR/Manpower is challenging job for an organisation especially on DRDO which holding very significant responsibility for the nation. In the past several years DRDO cannot meet its target well within time and seeking extensions in PDC again & again in several major projects of national significance. This drawback of DRDO has been noticed by Hon’ble Ex-PM Dr. Manmohan Singh, Ex- Defence Minister Shri A.K. Antony, CAG, CGDA, Parliamentary Standing Committee on Defence (15th Lok Sabha). This has been also noticed and criticised by you in DRDO Award Function on 20th August 2014 by saying “Chalta Hai wala attitude nahin chalega“.
Poor HR planning and deployment of scientists in various Lab/Estt of DRDO is major reason for not delivering the products and timely completion of project. Almost each and every lab/Estt all sundry work (Admin/Stores/Security/MTO/Library/works/ conservancy etc) are managed by qualified scientist and technical officials (more than 15% of total strength of DRDO) Simultaneously they are drawing all perks which is provided towards incentive in the name of scientific encouragement and also enjoying flexible complementary scheme on promotions which is also strictly for those who dedicatedly involve in scientific and technical assignments.
HR of DRDO comes under CCR&D (HR) which consisted of DOP, DHRD, RAC, CEPTAM, DESIDOC, ITM, MILIT, DIAT, DPI and RTI Cell. Presently Dr. G. Malakondiah, Distinguished Scientist is holding the charge of CCR&D (HR) and he was convicted by Madras High Court for imprisonment of three weeks in case of contempt of court this the highest example of ignorance of constitutions provision.
One such example of poor HR planning of DRDO is of Dr. A.K. Singh, Director, Directorate of Personnel, DRDO HQ, New Delhi. Dr. A.K.Singh, Scientist ‘G’ is great Nuclear Medicine scientist of India with five patents granted, fourteen patents filed, one copy right and more than fifty publications in international & national journals.Bio-Data of Dr. A.K. Singh is annexed.
As a matter of fact, despite having so many scientific contributions in area of Nuclear Medicines which is primarily used for treatment of cancer, brain tumours and complex diseases.
Dr. A.K. Singh was basically recruited for projects of DRDO in its New Delhi based unique laboratory working in Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Allied Sciences (INMAS). He worked in INMAS till the year 2004 but all of sudden he was transferred in DRDO HQ and assigned non-technical clerical assignments like Staff Officer to CCR&D.
Since the year 2004, the great Nuclear Medicine scientist is working non-scientific work like Director, CEPTAM, Director, DHRD and presently DOP. The work assigned to Dr. A.K. Singh is of administrative nature for which DRDO is having it’s another HR cadre known as administrative cadre and from this cadre manpower should be appointed in DOP.
Being a bonafide life science scientist, Dr. A.K. Singh, DOP not having any expertise in field of HR, therefore, he made several wrong decisions due to which DRDO faces lot of embarrassment and bad fame in media, it also affected various officials of DRDO who are facing several court cases in various courts all over India, even 15th October 2014 he received notice from CAT Delhi for his misadventure towards a senior scientist who belong to minority. This created lot of expenditure in term of fees to lawyers, TA/DA to attend court cases and cause of derailing scientific research tempo of DRDO.
Government of India is paying more than Rupees twenty lakhs to Dr. A.K. Singh, DOP for his non-productive and non-scientific work that can be carried out by any of the officer of Joint Director/Additional Director of DRDO from the admin cadre. DRDO wasting poor tax payers money.
Dr. A.K. Sigh is great Nuclear Medicine Scientist which is rare in DRDO. The discipline of Dr. A.K. Singh is from Life Sciences so proper utilization of his potential to posted him in Laboratory/ Establishment of DRDO under Life Sciences Cluster so he can contribute more in the national interest.
There are nine (09) Lab/Estt under Life Sciences Cluster of DRDO spread over all India. These are DEBEL, DIPAS, DIPR, INMAS, DRL, DIBER, DFRL, DIHAR & DRDE. Life sciences scientists are 120+ out of 7500 total DRDO scientist’s strength so proper utilization of these 9 labs can only possible when all life science scientists dedicatedly posted in Life Sciences Cluster of DRDO not in HR related Corporate Directorate. Dr A K Singh qualified life science scientist but he convert his field into technical services in the official records while as per his biodata he is fit for life sciences activities.
Sir you know the maxim “wrong shoe in right leg- “. Similar is the case of Dr. A.K. Singh who has been wrongly posted in HR assignments of DRDO while he is great Nuclear Medicine scientist with international fame scientific contributions in Nuclear Medicine. He is very much required in Lab/Estt of DRDO that are working in specialization of Dr. A.K. Singh like Defence Research Laboratory, Tezpur, Defence Research & Development Establishment, Gwalior, DEBEL, Bangalore and INMAS, New Delhi. Since Dr. A.K. Singh had already worked in INMAS, New Delhi for more than 16 years and his experience was bitter at INMAS thereby he was expelled from projects and scientific assignments at INMAS, New Delhi. Therefore the ,most suitable work places for getting output from his scientific knowledge and experience is DRL, Tezpur, DRDE, Gwalior and DEBEL, Bangalore.
Keeping in view of the facts stated above, to save public revenue and streamline HR of DRDO, it is very much required that scientists of the DRDO having educational qualification and experiences in life sciences should be posted in Lab/Estt under Life Sciences Cluster of DRDO.
Therefore I kindly and earnestly request you to start “operation clean- Swachta Abhiyan” in DRDO by transferring Dr. A.K. Singh, DOP from DRDO HQ to any of the Life Sciences Cluster Lab/Estt like DRL, Tezpur, DRDE, Gwalior or DEBEL, Bangalore so that poor & dirty HR of DRDO may be rich & clean.
“We feel Tessy Thomas serves as a role model and an inspiration for women scientists to achieve their dreams and have their feet planted in both worlds successfully,”
In January, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh told the Indian Science Congress that Ms Thomas is an example of a “woman making her mark in a traditionally male bastion and decisively breaking the glass ceiling”.
Ms Thomas – the media also love to call her Agniputri, or one born of fire, after the missiles she has helped develop.
An expert in ‘solid propellants’, which fuels Agni missiles, she is based at the Advanced Systems Laboratory in Hyderabad. ????????
But the charismatic scientist says she has never faced any anti-female bias at her workplace ??????
The media loves calling her Missile Woman – and with good reason.- By Pallava Bagla, Science Journalist
‘Agni Putri’ Tessy Thomas breaks glass ceiling – Rajat Pandit, TNN
Women scientists enter IIT council– Akshaya Mukul, TNN | Sep 2, 2014
NEW DELHI: The IITs, predominantly a male club that never had a woman director or scientist in its council, is in for a big change.
HRD ministry has nominated two women scientists Tessy Thomas and Vijayalakshmi Ravindranath to the IIT council, the apex body of 16 IITs.
A senior HRD official said, “The idea behind getting women scientists in the IIT council is to show that science is not the sole preserve of men. Women can be at par with men in carrying out research.”
Some of DRDO women scientists truly inspired by Tessy Thomas and all DRDO witnessing the progress of those women scientists who are following Tessy Thomas’s footsteps.
Few examples are
Ms J Manjula, Outstanding Scientist/Sc ‘H’ has taken over as Director DARE wef 01 July 2014.
Ms. AVACHAT SS, Scientist ‘G’ ARDE, Pune Expertise in Documention
Dr. Manisha Sathe, Scientist ‘E’, DRDE – YOUNG SCIENTIST OF THE YEAR AWARD2007
Dr. Vineeta Nigam, Scientist ‘E’ DMSRDE
And lot of other in queue
To 9th September 2014
Ms Prisca Mathew, CPIO, Under Secretary,
Room No. 428-C,
TECHNICAL EDUATION BUREAU,
MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT,
SHASTRI BHAWAN, RAJENDRA PRASAD ROAD,
NEW DELHI – 110 001
Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of Ms Tessy Thomas nomination by HRD Minister as director in IIT council, the apex body of 16 IITs.
File noting for nomination of Ms Tessy Thomas, Scientist-H, Director, ASL, Hyderabad (DRDO) as Director in IIT council
Whether any request were made from Min. of HRD for nominating/suggesting the name of candidate from DRDO for nominating as Director in IIT council (Y/N)
If yes then provide certified copy of letter sent by Min. of HRD to the DRDO.
Whether DRDO submitted/proposed the name/recommendation of Ms Tessy Thomas to Min. of HRD (Y/N)
If yes then provide the certified copy of the recommendation letter.
Criteria for nomination for women Director in IIT council by HRD and list of names consider for nomination of women Director.
Credential submitted by Ms Tessy Thomas or by DRDO for nomination of Director in IIT council.
To, 26th July 2014
Dr. RB Sharma, CPIO
DRDO HQ, Min. of Defence
DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg
New Delhi-110011
Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of M/s Jangid Construction, RZF 40, Street No. 40, Sadh Nagar Part II, New Delhi 45. It is observed Dr Vijay Veer, Director, DRL, Tezpur giving undue favor to M/s Jangid Construction ignoring the guidelines providing in DRDO purchase manual 2005.
M/s Jangid Construction constructed Entomology Building in DRDE, Gwalior under supervision of Dr Vijay Veer and this old connection now continue in DRL, Tezpur. The all construction / renovation job of DRL, Tezpur are supposed to come under CCE(east) but it is observed all such work are given to M/s Jangid Construction with support sleeping firms. Most of cases are raised with following firms which itself the corruption evidence.
i) M/s Jangid Construction, RZF 40, Street No. 40, Sadh Nagar Part II, New Delhi 45.
ii) M/s Balaji Construction Co, Dwarka, Delhi 75
iii) M/s Kushi Enterprises, West Patel Nagar, Delhi 08
iv) M/s Bhagwati Enterprises, Shiv Block, Delhi 45
v) M/s MRN Group, New Delhi 40
vi) M/s M K Decorator, Palam Colony, Delhi 30
In most of the cases scientists of DRL, Tezpur split their demand so it can be execute through limited tenders with above firms, who is the boss ?
Provide the supply order of M/s Jangid Construction for Entomology Building, DRDE.
Provide the copy of all supply orders of M/s Jangid Construction in respect of DRL, Tezpur.
Note: the requested information is not come under exemption of schedule –II of RTI Act 2005. Since, March 2014 end DRDO stopped to provide information under shadow of exemption. It is requested in above para-one of this request it is clear cut mentioned the corruption/ favoritism/ abuse of power, so before denial of information your point wise explanation is required that the matter not pertain under corruption.
DRDO has misused, manipulated and override the Flexible Complimenting Scheme (FCS) guide lines issued by DoPT, GOI. Above graph showing the failure of DRDO, DHRD, total mismanaged the manpower growth, because of dummy RAC bosses and also because of absolute power of Lab Directors.
OM No. AB-14017/36/2011-Estt(RR) dated 21st September 2012 – “FCS should be rigorous with due emphasis on evaluation of scientific and technical knowledge so that only scientists who have to their credit demonstrable achievements or higher level of technical merit are recommended for promotion.”
The FCS guidelines which are not following by DRDO
ANNEXURE-I
Criteria for Identifying Institutions/Organizations as Scientific & Technical Institutions and definition of Activities and Services, Scientists & Engineers and Scientific Posts
(i)The institutions referred to as S&T would be characterized by pursuit of excellence;
(ii)They should be engaged in research, design, development or programme implementation (including review, analysis, promotion and aspects of science policy, etc.) which would cover a broad spectrum of pure and applied research but the essential feature would be innovative character and spirit of enquiry that permeates their overall functioning;
(iii)The scientific culture is characterized by a few salient aspects, namely the persons involved are highly qualified and skilled technical personnel, involved in creative and innovative activity, they are willing to be judged on the basis of merit and competence rather than on the basis of seniority and a hierarchial structure;
(iv)The criteria could cover the aims and objectives of the institution/ organization, qualifications of the personnel, qualitative requirements for performance of various types of activities, etc.
Scientific Activities and Services:
Scientific activities and Services covered for considering the applicability of the Flexible Complementing Scheme are as under:
(a)Fundamental/basic research: Original investigation to gain new scientific knowledge, not necessarily directed towards any specific practical aim or application.
(b) Applied Research: Original investigation to gain new scientific or technical knowledge directed towards a specific practical aim or objective.
(c)Experimental Development: Use of scientific knowledge directed towards producing new or substantially improved materials, devices, products, processes, systems or services.
(d)S&T activities which are directly linked to R&D in terms of promoting the scientific activities and services.
Scientists and Engineers: Persons
(a)who possess academic qualification of atleast Master’s degree in Natural/Agricultural Sciences or Bachelor’s Degree in Engineering/Technology/Medicine; and
(b)working in those capacities, us or create scientific knowledge, and engineering and technological principles, i.e. persons with scientific or technological training who are engaged in professional work on S&T activities, high level administrators and personnel who plan, direct or coordinate the execution of S&T activities.
Scientific Post is the one, the incumbent of which is a ‘Scientist or Engineer’ defined above in a scientific institution/organization declared as ‘Scientific Department’ as defined and is engaged in the generation, advancement, dissemination, and application of scientific and technical knowledge in the S&T activities.ANNEXURE-II
CRITERIA FOR CONSIDERING PROMOTIONS UNDER FLEXIBLE COMPLEMENTING SCHEME
(a)All officers will be first screened on the basis of gradings in the Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs) for consideration for promotion; the ACRs should be assessed on a 10 point scale giving 10 marks for “outstanding”, 8 marks for “very good”, 6 marks for “good”, 4 marks for “average” and 0 for “poor” and only those officers who satisfy the minimum residency period linked to their performance as indicated in the table below be screened in.
Number of Year in grade345678
Scientist B to Scientist C85%80%70%65%60%…
Scientist C to Scientist D…85%80%75%70%60%
Scientist D to Scientist E…85%80%75%70%60%
Scientist E to Scientist F……85%80%75%70%
Scientist F to Scientist G……85%80%75%70%
Exceptionally meritorious candidates with all outstanding gradingsmay be granted relaxation in the residency period, the relaxation being not more than one year on any single occasion.Such a relaxation will be limited to a maximum of two occasions in their entire career.
(b)As the procedure adopted for assessment of CRs in various Scientific Departments differ at present, it has been decided that an external member, from Departments of Atomic Energy, Space or DRDO who have developed over the years a fine tuned system of screening in meritorious Scientists may be co-opted in the selection process, till such time a system gets established in other Scientific Departments.The position will, however, be reviewed after 5 years from the date of issue of this Office Memorandum.
DRDO has misused, manipulated and override the Flexible Complimenting Scheme (FCS) guide lines issued by DoPT, GOI. Above graph showing the failure of DRDO, DHRD, total mismanaged the manpower growth, because of dummy RAC bosses and also because of absolute power of Lab Directors.