Tag Archives: DOP

Drdo

How DRDO officials are misleading the Honorable Defence Minister

3 Comments

On the direction of Honorable Defence Minister, a high level committee was constituted under chairmanship of Dr. V. Bhujanga Rao, DS & CC R&D (NS&IC), members were Dr. G Malakondaiah, DS & CC R&D (HR & M), Lt Gen Anoop Malhotra, CC R&D (R&M and Implementation), Brig Ajay Gupta, Vigilance Director and Dr. A K Singh, DOP to find out the truth about the allegations of Sh Prakash Singh, Ex Senior Admin Officer, LESTECH, Metcalf House, Delhi.  (Copy of CVO MOD enclosed)

What are the allegations?

  1. The recruitment of Ms Swati Srivastava as Scientist ‘B’ was totally manipulated by  Dr Arun Kumar, DOP,OS, Scientist ‘H’.(Ex)
  2. The recruitment of Ms Geetha as Scientist ‘C’ was totally manipulated by Dr W Selvamurthy, DS & CC R&D (LS & IC) (now Ex)
  3. The recruitment of Mrs T Chandrabanu as Scientist ‘F’ was totally manipulated by the team led by Dr W Selvamurthy, DS & CC R&D (LS & IC) (now Ex)
  4. Misinterpretation of rules and manipulation to hide the facts by Shri Anil Kumar Maini, Director LESTECH, especially in the case of fire in Project “ Development of Advance Technologies for Power Scale up of COIL”

As per sources the report was submitted by stalwarts of DRDO and they gave clean chit in Ms S Geetha’s case to Dr W Selvamurthy, DS & CC R&D (LS & IC) (now Ex)

It is not understandable that these so called DRDO’s pillars have not seen the forged experience certificate and Dr A K Singh boasted that he very well knows that from whom and from where this forged certificate generated and Ms S Geetha was made eligible for the post.  Dr A K Singh has worked as a staff officer with Dr W Selvamurthy, DS & CC R&D (LS & IC) (now Ex)

Sir, any lay man can understand that this 38 days certificate is totally forged and prepared especially for Ms S Geetha, nn Ambedkar college, DU there was/is no funds for research assistant and in the application Ms S Geetha claimed that she was paid @ 5000/month. This is kind of a silly point that was overlooked by these senior DRDO officials because of the heavy weight of Dr W Selvamurthy, DS & CC R&D (LS & IC) (now Ex)

In the recruitment case of Ms Swati Srivastava as Scientist ‘B’ the committee accepting some irregularities in recruitment process.

But why they are not accepting that the base of recruitment of Ms Swati Srivastava was totally wrong the post was advertised for Biotechnology, then how come Environment Science candidate applied and got selected among so many deserving biotechnology candidates.  These involved DRDO officials have no hearts, they just cheated the whole nation and all deserving candidates.

In the recruitment case Mrs T Chandrabanu as Scientist ‘F’ the committee accepting some irregularities in recruitment process.

In the investigation of CVO,MOD they already found that she was not having required experience in the field.

Please find the proofs on above mentioned allegations then give marks to DRDO bluff masters, and this is really painful to see in this committee two members are from our great Indian Army.

Proofs/facts

High level committee
High level committee
Ms S Geetha's Application
Ms S Geetha’s Application
Ms S Geetha's Application
Ms S Geetha’s Application

Above red mark – Experience mentioned -Dr B R Ambedkar Cetre for Biomedical Research, Delhi University, Period 15 Nov 1999 to 23 Jan 2000 as research assistant salary Rs 5000 (there is no funds for such research assistant job) Assisted M Sc Students

1.Experience certificate submitted by Ms Geetha (daughter of Dr. W Selvamurthy)
1. Experience certificate submitted by Ms Geetha (daughter of Dr. W Selvamurthy)

 

2.Copy of RTI reply by Delhi University Prof Vani Bharmchari's statement
2. Copy of RTI reply by Delhi University
Prof Vani Bharmchari’s statement
Mrs T Chandra Banu
Mrs T Chandra Banu case
Mrs T chandra Banu's case notings
Mrs T chandra Banu’s case notings

 

 

Drdo

AMU VC committed financial impropriety’

2 Comments

15th January 2012

To
The Defence Minister
Room No -104, South Block
New Delhi – 110011

Reference: a)  Your letter No 1409-VIP/RM/2011 dated 21st March 2011
                       b)  Your letter No 1409-VIP/RM/2236 dated 20th May 2011           
 

Honorable Sir,

The following news was published on Friday, 13th January 2012 Times of India, New Delhi.

‘AMU VC committed financial impropriety’: CBI is believed to have found that AMU VC P K Abdul Azis had committed financial impropriety and knowingly claimed allowances for which he was not entitled.

Sir, Dr Prahlada, VC, DIAT, DRDO has also did same corruption and the RTI reply from JCDA and DRDO Hqrs proved the same then why the similar action is not taken by Ministry of Defence ?

Dr. Prahlada is not only case in DRDO there are so many other senior officials who have committed similar corruption until my RTI was raised. Like Sh S Ravi, Scientist ‘G’, Sh Neeraj Kumar, Scientist ‘D’ etc.

Please find enclosed documentary evidences of above corrupt practices done by DRDO officials for your needful action.

Yours sincere effort is needed to clean the DRDO.

Thanking you

Regards

Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008
Phone – 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
E-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com,  Website –  www.corruptionindrdo.com

Enclosed

  1. RTI reply of JCDA
  2. RTI Reply of DRDO Hqrs in respect of Dr Prahlada, Sh S Ravi, Scietist’ G’ etc
  3. RTI Reply of DRDO Hqrs in respect of Sh. Neeraj Kumar Scientist ‘ D’
  4. DOP,DRDO Hqrs letter for HRA recovery dated 17thAugust 2011
    JCDA RTI Reply
    DRDO Hqrs Reply
    DRDO Qrs RTI Reply 2
    DRDO Hqrs RTI reply in respect of Sh Neeraj Kumar
    Neeraj Kumar HRA Amount

     

    DOP Letter

     

Drdo

DRDO’s RTI cell are thinking that they are from MARS

4 Comments

29th December 2011

Dear Dr Saraswat Ji Good Morning

As you very well are aware about the complaint lodge against the website by Dr Arun Kumar, DOP who  is working in DRDO in service extension which is only meant  for those who are  real scientists and involved in international level research  work. As per Government of India order it is clearly stated that this extension provisions are not for those who are working in administrative jobs.

Despite various complaints/ court cases pending against him, it is really surprising that how DRDO top management is co-operating his unlawful acts.

Sir, in my 8th August 2011 letter to you I have informed you about DOP’s undue support to Sh Dharmendra Kumar, Scientist ‘B’, SPIC for unknown reasons.

“How Fast DOP Works in DRDO for his Beloveds”

https://corruptionindrdo.com/2011/08/08/how-fast-dop-works-in-drdo-for-his-beloveds/

DRDO RTI cell refuse to give me RTI reply related to Sh Dharmendra Kumar, Scientist ‘B’, SPIC, DRDO funny quote that we will not give you information because you will publish that on your website.

Sir, DRDO’s RTI cell forgot that they are public servant and govern by Indian constitutional law but unfortunately some scientist are thinking that they are from the MARS and nobody from common public can raise any voice against their illegal acts.

Recently I have received my RTI reply from Delhi University regarding the qualification information of Sh Dharmendra Kumar, Scientist ‘B’, SPIC, DRDO.

Please see that Sh Dharmendra Kumar, Scientist ‘B’, SPIC had hide is post-graduation degree that is MSc (Operational Research) which he obtained from Delhi University in 2001, when  he joined as STA ‘A’ in 20th October 2003.

Please see the following gazette notification of SRO 147 dated 28th June 2oo2 where it is clearly mentioned that “Candidates possessing the higher qualifications viz M Sc, Ph D, B.Tech, B E degree etc. shall not be considered for the recruitment”

Hope you will finally take appropriate action in time so the employees of DRDO start thinking that now there is a no need to send inputs to www.corruptionindrdo.com and their grievances and undue harassment will be properly taken care. It can only be possible to put honest, god-fearing, who believe in justice will post on key posts like CC (R&D), HR, DOP, RAC, CEPTEM etc. These posts are the origin of injustice, corruption, favouritism and nepotism.

Hope you will listen to my prayer and will do needful to clean the DRDO from evil of injustice, corruption, favouritism and nepotism.

Thanking you

Regards

Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun 248008 
Phone – 0135-2787750, Mobile,  9411114879
E-mail id  prabhu@dandriyal.com   , prabhudoon@gmail.com Website www.corruptionindrdo.com/
 
Drdo

RTI reply from DOPT regarding the extension of Dr Shubhananda Rao, CC R&D, (Areo).

6 Comments

  November 1, 2011

Dear friends of DRDO,

Today I have received a RTI reply from DOPT regarding the extension of Dr Shubhananda Rao, CC R&D, (Areo).

The reply is very interesting please see the Dr Arun Kumar’s expertise of manipulation, but in hurry how output generated, it is great example.

Please send your comments and analysis on this RTI Reply.

Thanking you

Regards
       
Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008
Phone – 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
E-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com,  prabhu@dandriyal.com

Website –  www.corruptionindrdo.com

Enclosed

  1. My RTI request to DOPT
  2. DOPT reply

                                                                                                 Date 10th June 2011

The CPIO
Under Secretary (Estt.A-IV)
R.No.202, North Block, D/o. Personnel & Training, North Block
New Delhi

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005.

Dr. A. Subhananda Rao, CC (R& D), Director HEMRL, Sutarwadi, Pune- 411021 granted extension/re-employment as per rule laid down wide OM DoPT O.M.No. 26011/1/77-Estt.(B)  dated the 18th May, 1977 for Central Government servants  beyond the age of superannuation.

Extension: F.R. 56(d) states that no Government servant shall be granted extension of service beyond the age of 60 years.  However, provisions exist in the rules to grant extension of service to certain category of Government servants only.  Therefore, it must be ensured that no Ministry/Department should propose to grant extension in service unless the case is covered by the Rules

  1. Please Provide me the copy of  proposal of extension in respect of Dr. A. Subhananda Rao, CC (R& D), Director HEMRL with copy of certificate of Integrity along with the DoPT prescribed Annexure-I (Enclosed)
  2. In the recommendation for extension of his service beyond 60 years whether any confirmation/ information regarding pendency of any criminal/ civil case against  Dr. A. Subhananda Rao, CC (R& D), Director HEMRL is mentioned or Not.

Find the application fee for the request attached with this application. If you feel that above requested information does not pertain to your department then please follow the provisions of Section 6(3) of the RTI Act, 2005/Also as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 please provide the details (Name and Designation) of the first appellate authority w.r.t to your department with the reply to the above request., where I may if required file my first appeal.
I do hereby declare that I am a citizen of India. Kindly provide me with the information at the address mentioned with the application. I request you to ensure that the information is provided before the expiry of the 30 day period after

Enclosed- Rs 10 Postal order 88E628354

Regards,
Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal    
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008
Phone – 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,  
e-mail id prabhu@dandriyal.com ,

www.corruptionindrdo.com

No. 26012/6/2002-Estt. (A)
 
Government of India
 
Ministry of Personnel, P.G. & Pensions
 
(Department of Personnel & Training )
 

New Delhi, dated 9th December, 2002

OFFICE MEMORANDUM

Subject : Grant of extension/re-employment to Central Government  servants  beyond the age of superannuation – issue of  instructions regarding.

The undersigned is directed to say that the criteria for grant of extension/re employment to Central Government employees beyond the age of superannuation are laid down in the DoPT O.M.No. 26011/1/77-Estt.(B)  dated the 18th May, 1977.  After May, 1998 and when the age of retirement  of the Central Government employees increased from 58 to 60 years, some  of the instructions contained in the O.M. dated 18th May, 1977 referred to above have lost their relevance.  Accordingly, it has been decided to revise the instructions relating to extension/re-employment to Central Government employees.

2. In the absence of specific orders to the contrary by the competent authority, a Government servant must retire on the due date.  The date of superannuation of a Government servant is known in advance and ordinarily there should not be a question of failure to make arrangements for his release sufficiently in advance.  It is the responsibility of the administrative authority concerned to ensure that the Government servants under their control retire on the due date.

3.  Extension: F.R. 56(d) states that no Government servant shall be granted extension of service beyond the age of 60 years.  However,  provisions exist in the rules to grant extension of  service to certain  category of Government servants only.  Therefore, it must be ensured that no  Ministry/Department  should propose to grant extension in service unless the case is covered by the Rules.

4. The proposal for grant of extension in service to the categories of  personnel referred to in the first, second and third proviso to F.R. 56(d)    -2- shall be referred to the Estt. Division of Department of Personnel and Training two months prior to the date on which the individual concerned is  due for superannuation.   The procedure for grant of extension to the Scientists is laid down in DoPT d.o. letter No. 28/19/2000-EO(SM-II) dated the 10th July, 2000.

5. Procedure for consideration of cases for extension of specialists in the medical and scientific fields:- It should be appreciated that even in the case of extension to specialist in the medical or scientific fields, it is not only the next man who misses promotion but often several people miss consequential promotions all along  the hierarchy.  Thus, too many cases of extension in service or reemployment are likely to cause frustration and affect the morale of the upcoming scientists who have exposure to latest technological developments in connecting fields.  Keeping in view these circumstances, the following criteria and procedure has been evolved with a view to ensure that extensions in service to the superannuating scientists are resorted to only in really exceptional circumstances.  The overriding consideration for the grant of extension is that it must be in the public interest and in addition satisfy one of the following two conditions:-

i)    that the retiring specialist is  not just one of the outstanding officers but is really head and shoulders above the rest; or

ii)   that other specialists are not ripe enough to take over the  job.

Test (ii) would be satisfied only if there is shortage in particular specialization, or if it is not possible to find a suitable successor or if the specialist is engaged on a work or project of vital importance, which is likely to produce results in a year or two.  If specialists in the next lower post are not eligible for promotion on the ground that they have not put in the minimum service in the lower grade prescribed under the rules, no promotions can be made to the higher grade, unless such specialists put in the requisite length of service.  But specialists who are eligible for promotion  to the post against which extension is recommended, should not be rejected solely on the ground that they do not have as much experience as the retiring specialist.  They should be considered for promotion according to the -3- recruitment rules and if they are found suitable they should be promoted to the posts being vacated by the retiring specialists.

6. Whenever any specialist is considered for grant of extension, his character roll and personal file should be carefully scrutinized and all other relevant information that may be available should be taken into account to judge whether the specialist had good reputation for integrity and honesty.   In cases where the specialist is not considered to have good reputation for integrity and honesty, he should not be considered for grant of extension in service.  The appropriate authority in the Administrative Ministry should furnish a certificate of Integrity along with the Annexure-I as follows where it proposes to grant extension of service.

“Having scrutinized in character roll and personal file of

Shri/Smt./Kum._____________________ and having taken into account all other relevant available information, I certify that he/she has a good reputation for integrity and honesty.”

7. While making proposals for extension of service in higher posts, it is all the more necessary to apply higher standards of efficiency to persons whose appointments to the higher posts are recommended for approval of the Appointments Committee of the Cabinet.  The number of top posts is bound to be very limited and a few persons should not have them for too long.  No Government servant who is on extension of service after the prescribed date of retirement should be promoted to another post during the period of extension of service.

8. No extension of service should be considered on the ground that a suitable successor is not available unless it is established that action to select a successor had been taken well in advance but the selection could not be finalized in time for justifiable reasons.  A proposal for the grant of extension of service based merely on the consideration that the specialist’s predecessor had been given extension should obviously not be accepted. -4-

9.  Re-employment: No proposal for employing a government servant beyond the age of superannuation of 60 years shall be considered.  It is also clarified that no person can be appointed/ reappointed to Central Government service after the age of superannuation of 60 years through contract.

10. Re-employment of military pensioners who have not reached the age of superannuation for Central Government employees will not be governed by these instructions.

11. Appointment of Consultant:-

Detailed instructions have been issued for appointment of consultant vide DoP&T’s Office Memorandum No. 16012/7/97-Estt.(Allowance) dated 13th  February, 1998. Hindi version will follow.

                Sd/-

 

Mrs. Pratibha Mohan

 

Director (E-II)

 

To

 All Ministries/Departments of the Government of India.

(As per standard list)

Annexure-I

 

Performa for sending proposals  for approval of Department of Personnel & Training for grant  of extension to Government servants beyond the age of superannuation.

1. Designation of the post

2. Duration of the post     :

3. Scale and terms of the post and perquisite attached, if any:

4. Whether financial sanction for the creation of the post/continuance of post for the    duration shown at (2) has been obtained:

5. Method of recruitment:

6. Name and the terminal date of appointment of the outgoing incumbent of the post:

7. Name of the specialist proposed for appointment and the service to which he belongs:

 

8. Full service particulars of the Officer with date of birth and pay drawn:

9. Names of other Officers considered:

10.If promotion post, whether copies of proceedings of a D.P.C. are being enclosed? If not, why not?

11. Whether character roll of the specialist proposed and those considered are being sent.  If not, why not?

12. Please indicate:

(i) (a) Whether the post  is scientific or medical specialist.

(b) Periods of extension granted earlier to the officer, if any

(c) Date from which extension is to be granted.

(d) Period of extension of service.

(ii) Justification for grant of extension:

(a)  The date from which it was known that vacancy would occur.

(b) Action taken to select a successor with chronological details.

(c) If selection is being made, reasons why this could not be finalized in good time.

(d) Can some officiating or ad-hoc arrangements be made, pending fresh appointment by proper selection? If not, why not?

(iii) Whether orders of the Minister-in charge have been obtained? 

13. Whether the prescribed Integrity Certificate, from the appropriate authority, is enclosed.

DOPT covering letter
integrity ceritificate - see the date?
Dr Arun Kupar's play 1
Dr Arun Kumar's play 2
Dr Arun Kumar's play 3
Dr Arun Kumar's paly 4

Dr Arun Kumar's play 5

 

 
Drdo

FAA Reply for SF Jagdalpur RTI Appeal

4 Comments

28th October 2011

Dear SFcian friends from Jagdalpur,

After receiving of the denial of RTI request by CPIO, DRDO, I appealed the matter to Appellate Authority as expected by us the denial of Appellate Authority, DRDO received by me.

As you already know about Dr Arun Kumar, DOP, DRDO, he is the one of the most corrupt official of DRDO and he is the total responsible for downfall of the DRDO. He is the man behind the all manipulations to uplift the incompetent and corrupt  officials of DRDO, their promotions, their posting, their extensions, their illegal financial benefits all matters are taken care by Dr Arun Kumar but question is up to which date because everyone very well know if somebody doing illegal activities it is limit and one has pay for that.

Since the website completed 17 months and in this period I have come across only one good act of Dr Arun Kumar, DOP that is the transfer of two blinds Sh Laxman, Admin Assistant, ACEM, Nasik & Sh Ravindra Gauda, HEMRL, Pune to their hometowns lab, but it was after the pressure of Sh Rajiv Varshnay, SA’s staff officer only. I want to thanks both of them for this noble cause.

I am requested Dr Arun Kumar please act for some good cause in last step of your service, so people will forget wrong doings.

After few months when you will retire no one can even like to say hello to you.

Dear SFcians pleas find below their denial of DRDO, but we will take up this matter to CIC soon and will get proper and legal solutions for issues.

Some important question

  1. The copy of fitness certificates of those vehicles which carries the employees daily to Girola plant site from SF Complex from competent authority.
  2. The copies of movement order of transports which carries the employees daily to Girola plant site from SF Complex from 1/7/2011 to 15/07/2011

Whether Above info is nature of strategic?

Since they have already  “One example: one of the scientists, named Shri Kushal Sahoo, was killed in an accident near Bakawand last year while returning from the Girola site to Jagdalpur in Bolero vehicle. Bakawand police station filed FIR and accident report (can refer the same with the police station). When settling the case the DRDO HQs asked the official movement order to consider it as death while performing duty. As the movement order was not issued actually for him and few more travelling in the same vehicle they were also injured, management of SF Complex made a statement of case stating that “Kusahl Sahoo is travelling for the purpose of meeting at Airport Terminal Building, Jagdalpur office”.

I really don’t our honorable SA put these inhuman persons in such important posts.

Thanking you

Regards 

Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun 248008
Phone – 0135-2787750, Mobile,  9411114879
E-mail id prabhu@dandriyal.com Website –  www.corruptionindrdo.com/

Enclosed

1. My appeal to  Appellate Authority, DRDO

2. FAA Reply for SF Jagdalpur RTI Appeal

The Right to Information Act, 2005

First Appeal for Central Govt.

I.D. No_________ Date: _________ [For office use]To                                                                                                                   
Dr Arun Kumar
OS & Director, Directorate of Personal
Room No.-217, DRDO Bhawan , Rajaji Marg
New Delhi – 110105

Sir,
As I am aggrieved by decision/no decision of Central Public Information Officer, I hereby file this appeal for your kind decision.

The reply of CPIO, DRDO, is completely confusing, misleading, incorrect, unjustified and willful not give any information, does not following the spirit of RTI Act 2005.

The information asked about SF Complex Jagdalpur is not come any norms of secrecy. I am not asking about any work or project information of SF Jagdalpur Unit.

1. Details of appellant
1.1       Full Name:                  Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
1.2.      Full Address:               21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008
1.3       Phone/Cell No.            0135-2787750 / 919411114879
1.4       Email ID:                     prabhu@dandriyal.com
2. Details of CPIO:
2.1 Name/Designation:           Dr A K Tyagi, CPIO, Head RTI Cell, Scientist ‘F’
2.2 Full Address :                    Room No 314 A, DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg, New Delhi -110105
2.3 Name of Public Authority: DRDO, Ministry of Defence, Government of India

3. Details of RTI application to CPIO:
Date of Application  : 19th July  2011
Mailed on:   19th July  2011
by  speed post

4. Particulars of payment of filing fee:
Paid Rs.10/- by   Postal Order No. 90E 611227

5. Details of information sought:

1)      The official address of SF Complex (one of the labs/Establishment of DRDO), JAGDALPUR?

2)       Copy of D O part order or any other order regarding the place of reporting duty at Plant Girola Village which is 40 Kms away from Jagdalpur.

3)            Copy of   D O part order any other order in which the employees posted at SF complex first they report to duty at SF Complex then report for duty at Girola Plant Site.

4)      The copies of movement order of transports which carries the employees daily to Girola plant site from SF Complex from 1/7/2011 to 15/07/2011

5)    The copy of fitness certificates of those vehicles which carries the employees daily to Girola plant site from SF Complex from competent authority.

Note: above required information is directly related to corruption and human right not come under schedule -II – why because it is noticed that without proper movement orders and without proper maintained vehicles the employees of SF complex are going daily at Girola plant. Earlier in one accident case it is heard that the movement order was made by SF Complex administration in back date to give financial benefits to the deceased family.

6. Particulars of Decision of CPIO:

Date of CPIO’s  Decision:9th August 2011

Date of receipt of decision by the appellant:12th August 2011

7. Brief facts of the case: 

The official address of SF Complex is “SF COMPLEX, AIRPORT TERMINAL BUILDING, JAGDALPUR-494001”. SFC Employees are given appointment letters with above address as reporting place. But, all are forced to report at the above address as well as at its work centre located at Girola village, Bakawand block, Bastar district. This location is completely out of 40 Kms away from municipality (Jagdalpur) of the official address.

As per rule they should report at the place of posting as per the appointment letter. But it is not so. Is it (forcing to report at other place) not violation of an employee’s right to report at the posting place? The management says that reporting place is at Girola and same time management says Airport terminal building, Jagdalpur. It is clear cut case of harassment of employees of SF Complex.

One example: one of the scientists, named Shri Kushal Sahoo, was killed in an accident near Bakawand last year while returning from the Girola site to Jagdalpur in Bolero vehicle. Bakawand police station filed FIR and accident report (can refer the same with the police station). When settling the case the DRDO HQs asked the official movement order to consider it as death while performing duty. As the movement order was not issued actually for him and few more travelling in the same vehicle they were also injured, management of SF Complex made a statement of case stating that “Kusahl Sahoo is travelling for the purpose of meeting at Airport Terminal Building, Jagdalpur office”.

If the travelling from Jagdalpur to Girola and back is official and as per the rule and the rule position should be clear for all for management, employees and the general public. After this accident all the staff of SF Complex Jagdalpur took a decision and reported at posting place only. This happened for two days and later management has interfered and threatened to them for report at Girola and told them if they will not report at Girola, will get termination letter.  Employees were forced to report at Girola. It is a violation of Human Right? Reporting at posting place is not correct? Then why appointment letters were given like that?  DRDO has to duty to provide them proper necessary papers as per rule position of Central Government.

The requested information is not come under 8(1) (a) and 24 (1) of the RTI Act at all because the information asked not in the nature of secrecy like The copy of fitness certificates of those vehicles which carries the employees daily to Girola plant site from SF Complex from competent authority. This the major concern of family and friends of employees of SF complex for their safety and well beings. For mere few thousand Rupees from contractors as bribe the Top DRDO officials playing with the life of SF Complex Employees.

The required information is fall under corruption and as well as violation human right and therefore in any means it is not come under schedule –II exemption of RTI Act 2005.

“RTI is a key instrument for imposing democratic values, accountability and transparency in our public administration,” Dr.Shah Faisal (IAS topper 2010 & RTI activist of J&K RTI Movement NGO) told Sakàl Times

 
8. Reasons/grounds for this appeal:
i)     To know the sensitiveness and work environment of DRDO

ii)     To expose the corrupt practices prevailing in DRDO

9. Any other information in support of appeal: 

10. Prayer/relief sought for: 

It is requested that please provide me correct information as per request of my RTI dated 19th   July 2011   in larger public interest, because it is directly related to corruption and violation of Human rights.

11. Enclosures: 

i)              My RTI request dated  19th July 2011

ii)              Denial of CPIO, DRDO Hqrs dated 09 August 2011

12. Declaration:I hereby state that the information and particulars given above are true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I also declare that this matter is not previously filed with any information commission nor is pending with any Court or tribunal or authority.Regards

 

Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008
Phone – 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhu@dandriyal.com website www.corruptionindrdo.com
Denial of Appellate Authority page 1
Denial of Appellate Authority page 2
Uncategorized

Open Appeal –Save DRDO: Dr Saraswat and Dr Avinash

2 Comments

All of us pained by various letters and RTI proofs appearing on Internet about Corruption & Nepotism about DRDO. We are more pained that you both are keeping silent and no visible actions are being taken. The Villain (Selwamurthy) of DRDO is enjoying and he pushing his people on all fronts to destabilize and embarrass you. One fine example is Varshney who is controlling your office and passing minutely details to his Real BOSS-Selwamurthy.

The material appearing on Internet, may be some of them incorrect and exaggerated, but has created unrest in DRDO- Some are enjoying, some are pained and some, particularly younger lot, confused and feeling betrayed.

A special appeal to both, spare your 48 hours on some of the critical and burning issues and decide and give positive signal to all of us that you are impartial and truly committed towards growth of DRDO in a healthy manner. Don’t involve The Villain for this, he will only misguide you, we recognize both of you as our true guide and have confidence that you will take corrective actions which are visible across all section of DRDO. We all are waiting for ACTIONS and send us POSITIVE energy by your Impartial actions.. YOU ARE DUTY BOUND TO TAKE ACTIONS IMPARTIALLY.

Some of burning issues and suggestions are

  1. NO MORE EXTENSIONS, except very deserving cases, not more than 2 to 3 per 6 month cycle. Extension is equal to death sentence, which is given on rarest of rare cases by our courts. Extension should be also based on principle of rarest of rare cases. If extension given to CV&E, LS, CEPTAM, it will be major joke on DRDO.
  2. Review all extension cases already given, Act as Supreme court and commute certain cases of death sentence. Retire some of tainted and wrongly extension cases like of Selwamurthy, Mohan Rao, Arun Kumar, Jain, Agarwal RC, Narendra Kumar, and similar cases.
  3. You have given charge of HR to very competent Chief Controller. But his Directors are still aligned to Pseudo-HR controller. Do complete overhauling of HR & DOP, it will correct many wrongs of Selwamurthy and his Chamchas who have destroyed basic fiber of DRDO. Let them keep making Mosquito repellent and Chapattis. Implement policy of change of DOP, RAC,DHRD, CEPTAM every 2 year and don’t just rotate them.
  4. International Cooperation Controller should be person who had collaborated with different countries in his younger and middle carrier. A yoga teacher is just unfit for this job and using this as platform for self image enhancement.
  5. Dr PS Goel should not be given Extension; the HARD fact is that he is only responsible for bringing moral of all scientists to deep sea low level.
  6. Grass root level interaction of SA with middle and younger lot in different zones, on at least quarterly based. It will bring a Sea change if all are given free environment to discuss with their family head.
  7. Accountability of Directors and Chief Controllers should be more aggressive and transparent. They should be answerable to all wrong done in their areas, including poor result in respect of deserving scientists in assessment due to non projection of their achievement in right manner.

WE ARE WAITING_PLEASE ACT FAST

By- Honest and Well-Wishers of DRDO

Drdo

AAP KI ADALAT-EPISODE -2

3 Comments

Following is the contribution of honest, hardworking, sincere and sensitive government servants’ of DRDO, Ministry of Defence concern to national defence.

I acknowledge their sincerely and commitment towards uprooting the corruption, nepotism, favoritism prevailing in DRDO.

Regards

Prabhu Dandriyal

Aap ki Adalat

Sh PDD (DRDO Anna) and all non corrupt colleagues of DRDO

A group of part time artists (from DRTC, DRDS, Admin) from headquarters and Delhi labs are starting a old and well known method of STREET PLAY to highlight Corruption, Bhai chara, carelessness in management of our DRDO for last 2 years by Retired team of Chief controllers, Corrupt Directors and MOST CORRUPT SA to RM. WE are using street as Website of Sh PDD. All are affected; scientists are also affected by mis-rule of DR VKS. First 6-8 episodes will be on DrVKS, honorable (?????) SA to RM. This will be followed by -WILLIAM SELVAMURTHY, PS GOEL and all “Distinguished”. Outstanding” and “Dictators (Directors)” . The frequency of episodes will be flexible, keep seeing our Anna’s website and give your comments for any particular topic and person to be called in Aap ki Adalat.

 

Viewers, This is Dr VKS Episode-II

RS: We welcome again Dr Saraswat in our show…

VKS: Thank you, Rajat, I will tell you first episode was very hit

RS: Yes Prabhu informed me

VKS: Oh!! GOD also saw this program

RS: No No. this time you got confused, Prabhu Dandriyail!!!

VKS: (sighs) You have upset my mood in beginning itself……has Gupta (PI) not contacted you?

RS: Ok OK, Sir tell us nowadays William’s news are more than you in newspapers, what is the secret.

VKS: Yes, we are observing, Saiwanjee, Darshan, Vasu also observed, very serious matter, we will discuss next week in missile complex and find out reasons and motive. I will fire Gupta, he is irritating me lot. He has not settled with you and sending more stories of William.

RS: Last episode you praised William?

VKS: Keep guessing

RS: People are saying in last 2 years you have done more strategic mistakes than strategic missile launches. Any comments.

VKS: This Pillai is propagating these false news; nobody can beat me in this business, Pillai, Avinash, Prahlada, no one.

RS: Sir, all your lab Directors are ineffective in delivery, they are expert in Procurement, corruption. Nepotism…this is general impression in DRDO fraternity…

VKS: Why lab directors. I don’t agree, you see Tandon, Arun, Shukla, AK, all great Headquarter directors, they are true gems of ORDO

RS: How to reduce Corruption…

VKS: There is no corruption in DRDO, this is just myth of more than 90 percent of DRUG people that we are corrupt. Antony ji is supporting me, PM is supporting me, so where is corruption. All nonsense.

RS: Then why we are finding so many cases on Prabhu’s web site.

VKS: We hacked he site, but it reappeared, we will do something permanent about this.

RS: For removing corruption…

VKS: No No, permanently hacking this Site. Corruption, No there is no corruption, because I said so, it cannot be wrong, Stop this point here. Gupta will meet you and will explain. Tell me we have no commercial break in this programme?

RS: Sir, our marketing team tried, but failed

VKS: This is very bad, I will tell Vasuji, Ajay, Shukla…my bright boy I made him Scientist G in 4 years, great work done by him GOD BLESS YOU, these all people will get you many many commercials from our well trusted vendors. Gupta I will bang you.

RS: Ok, can we discuss Rama Rao implementation?

VKS: Antony ji telling me to do some cosmetic changes. I will make CCs, but essential qualification will be they should be more than 62 years.

RS: Why Sir, more experienced?

VKS: No NOT they will be busy in their extension case, I will have all powers!! Ha Ha!.

RS: So Rama Rao implemented?

VKS: See last year I am empowered my dear Directors with enhanced financial powers, they are happy, so Rarna Rao is implemented. All are happy CCs, new DOs, Myself, my dear Directors..all are happy

RS: But what was main aim behind Rama Rao committee?

VKS: I am frank actually I have to refer back to his report to be specific. But we have to live in realities, so what I am doing is the best for DRDO and my missile complex people. Again I am thankful to Saiwanjee, Vasu ji, Darshan.,,.

RS: Sir you have forgotten Williams?

VKS: He is badmash, I will handle him now. Thanks for highlighting his game to me. Gupta, I will bang you..

RS: Mohan Rao case, Bhoopathy case, Agarwal case, all are glaring example..

VKS: They are great scientists, small small mistakes they do and all of you give fire to these small mistakes.

RS: Parlour visit in office time….is it small case

VKS: What is so big about this, please ignore all these small small incidents, bachen hai…Ok I have to go, you know this time I have to meet Antony ji, he is pressing me to take some cosmetic changes and cosmetic actions on Mohan, Boopathy, Arun,. . .nothing to worry I will handle him. Thank you again Salwanjee, Vasu ji, Darshan,,…THANK YOU VIEWERS GOD BLESS YOU……GOD and not that Prabhu Dandriyal, keep him away.

RS – Rajat Sharma (the famous anchor of Aap Ki Adalat TV show)

VKS– Dr V K Saraswat, Scientific Adviser to RM, D G, Secretary, DRDO

Gupta– Sh Ravi Gupta, Director Public Interface, DRDO, Ph No. 011-23011073 Mobile 9868276099. Man behind all DRDO paid news @ Rs 50000/- budget 1 Crores annually.

William – Dr W Selvamurthy, CC R&D (LS)

Salwan jee– Prof. S K Salwan, Ex- Director, ITR, ARDE and Project In-charge – ‘NAGARATANAM’ , Chairman – Armaments Research Board, Chairman –enquiry committee which one investigating the corruption/ nepotism charges against Dr Arun Kumar, DOP, DRDO -70+ Hqrs -age

Vasu ji- Dr SK Vasudeva, Ex-Director, SPIC money making machine for Scientific Advisers to RM, serving in 3rd consequent extension and handling all mysterious projects of DRDO and involved her daughter also.

Darshan: A retired DRDO employee Dr Saraswat’s pet man.

Tandon : Mr. Sanjay Tandon, Director Material Management, DRDO Hqrs got promotion (rewarded) in 4 years Scientist ‘F’ to ‘G’ expertise in manipulations in procurement and helped Dr V K Sirvastava, SA’s  son-in law companies to establish in DRDO.

 Ajay: Brig. Ajay Gupta, Director Vigilance, DRDO Hqrs helping SA to handle all corruption / nepotism complaints/ issues according to his wish.

Shukla : Capt P K Shukla, Director Management Services, Ex- Navy Officer who is the trained gang man of most corrupt king of DRDO Dr A S Bains, – Ex Director DEAL and presently Director Management services DRDO Hqrs and got promotion(rewarded) in 4 years, he will be retire in October 2011 but planning him adjust this bright boy in ADA or other pocket DRDO establishment of DRDO.

Rama Rao Committee:  The Defence Ministry had set up a committee on February 8th 2007, chaired by Former Secretary, Department of Science and Technology, Dr. P Rama Rao to review and suggest measures to improve the functioning of DRDO. The Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) Review Committee constituted by the Government to suggest measure for improving the functioning of DRDO inter alia Ministry of Defence, and Services has submitted its report to the Government on 05th March 2008. It is under study of the Government.

Mohan Rao- Sh T Mohan Rao – Ex Director, GTRE caught red handed by Bangalore police in Jay Mahal Massage Parlour on 11th Maay 2011 with a supplier’s agent Sh V N Narayan and spend one night in police custody. He was removed as director, GTRE and attached with CEMILAC, but he is enjoying his service extension. 

Boopathy: Sh G Bhoopathy, Director, DLRL, Hyderabad joined as Charge man and rise up to Director,  in Feb 2011 he did great job, the contractor supplied two …… using project hired vehicles in his house and all drama was seen by guards, enquiry set up but nothing is done byDr VK Sarswat. Like old time when king was busy with ayashi then opportunist start looting and same thing happened in DLRL, misuses of power started in every corner of DLRL.

Arun: Dr Arun Kumar, DOP, DRDO Hqrs is the top manipulator of DRDO, whether it is question in manipulation of recruitment, or manipulation of promotion, or manipulation of service extension he is the best. Lot of complaints are pending against him, Civil Cases, Criminal Cases, Complaint in Women Cell, Complaint in CVC. SA blindly saving him for unforeseen reason may be SA is blackmailing by Dr Arun Kumar.

Drdo

SF COMPLEX, JAGDALPUR, DRDO (PUBLIC MONEY GETTING MISUSED) OUTCOMES OF PUBLISHED MATTER IN CORRUPTION IN DRDO WEBSITE

3 Comments

16th September 2011

 Dear DRDO’s Friends

Please find following response from our SFCIAN, DRDO Complex, Jagdalpur. Now it is establish that if you put voice in genuine matters then DRDO management can’t ignore it, beside the corrupt official sitting there in top like DOP, Dr Arun Kumar have to take decision as per Government laid down rules and on the basis of humanitarian ground.

So keep it up and raise your voice against corruption, nepotism and favouritism prevailing in DRDO by all means but same time consider the national security also.

The Government has allowed us to speak about corruption, so don’t fear to expose corruption because the corruption is eating our organization like termite. The friends from all DRDO labs sharing their problems of harassments, victims of favouritisms like in this time the DRDO lab Directors did a very much unconstitutional act. In A-Par they reduced the marks in some cases more than 10 marks and increased more 10 marks to their favourite ones. Here the question arises, that how come a lab Director judge minutely the work done by DRTC staff instead of his immediate boss who is leading the project. It is clear cut conspiracy or act of sabotaging the projects undergoing in DRDO.

In RTI anyone ask these anomalies but on the other side I want to inform all you that in DRDO, DRDC meeting it is decided that the RTI activities are to be suppressed and also suppress representation practices, in this year at the last moment DRTC result was revaluated as per new unwritten guidelines they cut those name who were involved in any RTI’s / representations.

In one case of IRDE, Dehradun, the chairman of assessment board did not like the body language of candidate and declared unfit for promotion. The question is that the DRDO authorities who made these retired DRDO officials as chairman on the basis to oblige them are well versed about the proceeding of board. Nowhere is written about body language, or what to wear. This kind of examples is lame excuses to hide their ugly acts.

Dear friends this forum invites to send your RTI’s even without exposing your names, the only restraint is that the matter should be correct and not for a vindictive aim.  We, the team of www.corruptionindrdo.com, will take the issue up to highest authority.

Thanking you

Regards
Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008
Phone – 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
E-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com,  prabhu@dandriyal.com 
Website – www.corruptionindrdo.com 

Enclosed

SFCIAN’s letter to www.corruptionionindrdo.com

sf complex, JAGDALPUR, DRDO (public money getting misused)outcomes of published MATTER IN CORRUPTION IN DRDO WEBSITE

We are very thankful to you sir, for published matter of corruption that going on in SF Complex, Jagdalpur dated between 21-07-2011 to 29-07-2011.

The major outcome of published matter as per our observations is as follows:

  1. In that it was mentioned that GM’s (P.N.Tengli) favour scientist called tejasvi whenever he goes on TD to do GM’s personal Ph.D work he used to mention minimum 6-12 locations in single td.

observation:

WHEN THIS MATTER WAS PUBLISHED IN CORRUPTION IN DRDO WEBSITE,TEJASVI WAS IN TD FOR 12 LOCATIONS,BUT AS SOON AS IT AS PUBLISHED IN NET BOTH OF THEM GOT FEAR AND HE BREAK HIS TD IN HALFWAY & HE RETURENED BACK TO JAGDALPUR WHICH CLEARLY SHOWS BOTH ARE DOING REALLY MISCHIEF.

  1. To purchase GM’s required items GM has kept tejasvi as cash purchasing officer for last 3year and continuing now also which is completely against Govt.Rules(it is allowed only max 6months as per rule).

observation:

WHEN THIS MATTER WAS PUBLISHED IN CORRUPTION IN DRDO WEBSITE, IMMEDIATELY GM MADE OFFICE ORDER THAT TEJASVI HAS RELIEVED FROM CASH PURCHASE WHICH CLEARLY SHOWS BOTH ARE DOINE REALLY MISCHIEF IN CASE PURCHASE.

  1. GM is using hired luxury vehicle for daily travel to office of rental of RS.30, 000/- per month even though govt.allotted lalbadhi vehicle is available.

observation:

WHEN THIS MATTER WAS PUBLISHED IN CORRUPTION IN DRDO WEBSITE, IMMEDIATELY GM STARTED USING LALBADHI AGAIN WHICH CLEARLY SHOWS HE ACCEPTED HIS MISCHIEF.

WE ARE HAPPY THAT SOME CHANGE HAS BROUGHT UP BECAUSE OF PUBLISHEMENT IN YOUR WEBSITE.

BUT, WHAT & ALL THEY HAVE DONE MISCHIEF WITH GOVT.MONEY .i.e.,

a)    DEPOSITING CASH PURCHASE ADVNCE MONEY IN THEIR PERSONAL ACCOUNT AND WHAT & ALL THEY EARNED BY CASH PURCHASE.

b)    DONE THEIR PERSONAL WORKS (PH.D works) IN PUBLIC TAX MONEY.

c)    MISUTILISATION OF CSD MONEY AS THEIR PERSONEL MONEY & utilisation of csd money FOR LADIES CLUB IN WHICH HIS CLOSE OFFICERS WIFE ONLY ARE MEMBERS.

d)   MISUTILISATION OF GOVT.AWARDS BY BLUFFING GOVT. (BY MAKING FAKE DOCUMENTS) AND earning MONEY FROM THIS AWARD FOR THEIR PERSONEL BENEFITS WHERE REALLY DESERVED CANDIADATES ARE REALLY THERE.

e)    There is a rule that temple should not be constructed in govt.land. But, the existing GM since,he is an hindu,he is constructing temple & in the name of temple construction he is collecting fund from vendors and contractors for which there is no accountability.

note: 1.what people other than hindu will go for prayer?

2. giving money to ravi sankar pandit sort of saints only for getting darshan of him for them only which is an csd public money?what rights they are having to give money to saint for their own darshan from public money!

f)    threatening staffs that prohibition period will be increased if they are not listening to them and giving promotion to their favouring persons viloating eligible persons by holding hrd incharge post.

so,

  1. WHAT IS THE ACCOUNTABLITY FOR ABOVESAID MISCHIEFS & CORRUPTION? LIKE THIS THEY HAVE TO APPRECEIATED TO BECOME KING OF CORRUPTIONS ?

(OR)

THEY HAVE TO BE PUNISHED?

  1. WHETHER GOVT.WILL TAKE SOME ACTION AGAINST TEHM TO MAKE THEM ALLRIGHT?

(OR)

WHETHER DRDO WILL GROW IN THIS CORRUPTION ENVIRONEMENT FOR DEVELOPING DEFENSIVE PRODUCTS FOR NATIONAL PROTECTION?

IT IS BIG QUESTION?????????????

yes! Govt has to take necessary action for all above-said because

 It is involved

Public tax money! Public tax money! Public tax money!

&

Hence,

Please save public money!

-C.

 FROM 
SF COMPLEX,
DRDO, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE,
AIRPORT TERMINAL BUILDING,
JAGDALPUR,
CHATTISGARGH-494001.
PH.NO:07867-289461-65.
FAX.NO:07867-289466.
Drdo

Recovery of HRA – RTI Success Story -1

7 Comments

To                                                                                                       15th September2011
The Defence Minister
Room No -104, South Block
New Delhi – 110011

Reference: a)  Your letter No 1409-VIP/RM/2011 dated 21st March 2011
                       b)  Your letter No 1409-VIP/RM/2236 dated 20th May 2011

 Honorable Sir,

To expose the corrupt practices of DRDO top brasses I sought under RTI Act -2005 several informations and as I have already reported you few cases to you , where DRDO took the shelter under schedule-II exemption and did not gave the information. I approached the appellate authority but he also outright dismisses my requests which were asked in larger public interest.

Finally when I appealed to CIC (Chief Information commissioner) and CIC ordered DRDO authority to furnish the information to applicant.

Now DRDO compelled to issue a letter seeking recovery of HRA (House Rent Allowances) from those scientist/ officers who have stayed/staying in guest houses and also claimed/ claiming the HRA (House Rent Allowances)

The enclosed letter No DOP/03/3100/M/05 dated 17th August 2011 is meaningless until the HRA  (House Rent Allowances) recovered with interest from guilty scientist/ officers

DRDO top officers are enjoying this corrupt practice since early 1990.

In this connection an interesting case is that a senior top officer was posted to DRDO Hqrs was stayed in guest house and in the same time he was allotted Type IV/V Government accommodation, which he was rented to private person and collected approx Rs 30000 /month even after his retirement from DRDO. He was continued hold that house almost 5 years after retirement. This is the one of the famous case of DRDO and SA to RM knows it very well. It can happen in only in DRDO.

To stop this corrupt practice permanently from DRDO, Sir, you are requested to consider following and pass the appropriate order to Defence Secretary on this subject matter.

All those scientist/ officers who are staying/or stayed in guest house and claiming or claimed HRA (House Rent Allowances) should refund the amount with interest as per CCS (CCA) rules.

This deliberated attempt to fool the system and generate the illegal money should appropriately deal as per CCS (CCA) rules and to be reflected in their service book.

Thanking you

Regards
Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008
Phone – 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
E-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com,  prabhu@dandriyal.com 
Website – www.corruptionindrdo.com 

Enclosed

  1. Letter No DOP/03/3100/M/05 dated 17th August 2011

Copy to

  1. Defence Secretary, Room No 101, South Block, New Delhi -110011
  2. Scientific Adviser to RM, DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg, New Delhi – 110105

    Recovery of HRA