Tag Archives: DOP

RTI-PCDA (R&D) – Audit of service books

To,                                                                                                                    16th July 2014
Shri Pritam Dutta, IDAS,
ACDA, CPIO,CVO,
O/o PCDA (R&D), West Block-V,
R K PURAM,
NEW DELHI- 110066              

 

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of audit of service books of DRDO officials. It is observed that several DRDO officials were acquired Diploma/ Degree after joining DRDO from various deemed universities / private institutes/IGNOU via distance education mode etc. and most of the cases the courses are not recognised by APEX body like UGC/AICTE/DEC etc. in RTI replies DRDO also accepted this facts. (Copy enclosed)

  1. Provide the copy of audit reports of service record verification specially the part where the higher qualification was endorsed of Sh Hoshiyar Singh Kalsi, STA-C, Smt. Nisha Teneja, STA-C,Sh Ramesh Kotiyal, STA-B, Smt. Netu Rawat, STA-B, Sh Virendra Singh Negi, STA-B,Sh Saket Jain,STA-B, Sh.Sudhir Kumar, STA-B of DEAL Dehradun.
  2. Provide the certified copies of verifications reports provided by administration of DEAL Dehradun towards above mentioned seven officials of DEAL, Dehradun.

 

 Note : Matter is directly related to corruption and not exempted under Section 24 (1) as a proof the RTI replies and DOP, DRDO letter is enclosed

Regards

Prabhu  Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun -248008
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website www.corruptionindrdo.com
Drdo RTI reply on fake degree 1
Drdo RTI reply on fake degree 2
Drdo RTI reply on fake degree 3
 
RTI reply drdo hq fake degree12 marchfake degree dop letterfake degree dop letter page2

RTI-PCDA (R&D) – Verification of Diploma/Degree

To,                                                                                                                    16th July 2014
Shri Pritam Dutta, IDAS
ACDA, CPIO,CVO
O/o PCDA (R&D), West Block-V
R K PURAM
NEW DELHI- 110066              

 

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of audit of service books of DRDO officials. It is observed that several DRDO officials were acquired Diploma, Degree after joining DRDO from various deemed universities  via distance education mode etc  and most of the cases the courses are not recognised by APEX body like  AICTE,DEC etc  in RTI replies DRDO also accepted this facts.   It is also observed that the individuals who received such diploma/ degrees were also received lump sum incentive grants for acquiring higher qualification as per DOPT OM No. 1/2/89-Estt Pay-I dated 9.4.99 but their respective acquired qualifications were not duly verified by DRDO

  1. Provide the certified copies of verification reports provide by DRDO in respect of following individuals.

Acquired from JNTU, Hyderabad

  1. Sh. Siyaram, STA B  RCI  B Tech Mech   1.6.2010
  2. Shri A Venkateshwara Rao, STA B DRDL,  B Tech Mech  1.8.2010
  3. Sh. G Venkatesh STA B DMRL  B Tech Civil   7.3.2012
  4. Sh. B Baludu, TO A RCI,   B Tech Mech  7.3.2012

Acquired from  MAHARSHI DAYANAND UNIVERSITY, ROHTAK

  1. Sh U Maheshwarn, STA C DIPR  M Sc,CS  3.9.2009
  2. Sh Deepak Kumar, STA B DESIDOC  M Sc,CS 31.3.2010
  3. Smt Laxmi Verma, STA C DESIDOC   M Sc,CS 20.09.2011
  4. Sh Puneet Kumar, STA C DESIDOC  M Sc,CS 30.09.2011
  5.  Sh Mandeep Singh Basra, STA B IRDE  M Sc,CS 30.09.2012

Acquired from ANNA UNIVERSITY, CHENNAI

  1. Sh R Anandh, STA B CVRDE   BTech E &C E   1.12. 2010
  2. Sh S Purshotham, STA B CVRDE   BTech Mech 1.12. 2010

Acquired from  ANDHRA UNIVERSITY, Visakhapatnam

  1. Sh Ankam Sreekar, STA B,  SFC BTech E&EE  28.2.2011
  2.  Sh Ram Prakash Yadava, STA B , SFC  BTech Chem  9.2.2011
  3. Sh U Thanigaivelan, STA C , HEMRL BTech Chem  28.2.2011
  4. Sh P V Krushna Rao, STA C NSTL  BTech Chem 12.8.2011
  5. Sh M Mahesh, STA C NSTL   B.Tech Mech 22.8.2012
  6. Sh K V Ranga Rao, TO C NSTL  BTech Chem  8.8.2012
  7. Sh V Venkateshwarlu, STA C, NSTL  B.Tech Mech 23.2.2013

Acquired from JRN University, Rajasthan

  1. Sh Rakesh Kumar Soni, STA C  BTech Chem 13.7.2012
  2.  Sh Shankar K N, STA C LRDE  B.Tech  Mech 12.1.2013
  3. Sh Amit Chawla, STA B LASTEC  B.Tech EC&Ein 16.8.2012

Acquired from Sikkim Manipal University, Gangtok

  1. Smt.Sampaty Senapati,  STA ‘C’ ITR M Sc, CS 9.8.2013
  2. Smt Balbir Kaur, TO  C  RAC   M Sc, CS 10.5.2013
  3. Sh Narendra Kumar Thakur, TO C SASE acquired M Sc, CS 24.1.2012
  4. Sh Srinivas Juluru, TO B DRDL  M Sc, CS 1.5.2006
  5. Sh Arvind Kumar, STA B INMAS   M Sc, 25.9.2012

Note : Matter is directly related to corruption and not exempted under Section 24 (1) as a proof the RTI replies and DOP, DRDO letter is enclosed

Regards

Prabhu  Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun -248008

Registration Number         MODEF/R/2014/61246

DMSRDE – Second Fact Finding Inquiry Committee 9th & 10th July 2014

It seems DRDO take U –turn in DMSRDE corruption cases. Shri AvinashChander , DGR&D and SA to RM constituted second four members  FFIC under Chairmanship of Dr. D C Pande, Outstanding Scientist, LRDE, Bangalore  and members Shri Haribabu Srivastva, Director, LASTEC, New Delhi, Shri R S Mehta, Joint Director, Dte of Vigilance& Security, DRDO Hqrs, Shri Jagdeep, Scientist ‘F’,Dte of Materials Management DRDO Hqrs  reached at Kanpur on 9th July early morning 5:00 AM at DMSRDE, Guest House, Kanpur by Rewa Express.

In deference to three members first FFIC which was led by Dr. S S Negi, Outstanding Scientist,this second FFIC did not entertained Dr. A K Saxena, Director, DMSRDE, Kanpur. Dr.Saxena  was sent for two days leave and remained in  his government residence just adjacent to Transit Hostel’s DRTC Room where whole FFI was  conducted for two days by FFIC.

The first FFIC Committee did their inquiry under supervision of Dr. A K Saxena in DMSRDE Office in the room just opposite to Dr. Saxena office so that he can monitor activities of first FFIC. Chairman & members of first FFIC tried their best to discourage complainants and in month of March 2014  all scientists were under pressure due to their APAR and coming assessment and not opened or uttered any single word against Dr. A K Saxena in front of   first  FFI Committee. The first FFI Committee overlooked the gravity of complaints to Defence Minister rather they were busy in digging the past history of complainants. They were basically misleded and managed by Dr. A K Saxena.

The letter No DOP/DS/008/M/01 dated 28 May 2014 of DOP Dr. A K Singh prepared on basis of first FFI Committee Report already exposed the nexus between Dr. A K Saxena and first FFI Committee because the without any constitution rights and ignoring the terms and condition of FFI Committee they simply recommended the transfers of both complainants with baseless and illogical reasons. It should be asked to Dr. S  S Negi, Outstanding Scientist that if on allegations of habitual  drinking one senior Scientist  may be transferred then what about the drinkers of whole DRDO right from top at DRDO HQ and bottom at 52 Establishment/Labs of DRDO. Why they have not been transferred even they are heavy habitual drinker. In fact first FFIC was  hijacked by  Dr. A K Saxena.

The two days grilling of involved scientists of DMSRDE by second  FFI Committee members especially by Shri Mehta, Vigilance, DRDO Hqrs shows some hope that the committee will help to Shri Avinash Chander , DGR&D and SA to RM and DRDO Hqrs to take one step forward towards eradicate prevailing corruption in DRDO like Dr A K Tyagi, Sc ‘G’ waiting to face CVC disciplinary proceeding against him as he also involved in corrupt practices in procurement at DIAT, Pune.

Some scientists of DMSRDE given in writing about the facts of these procurements and shows their helplessness.

Second FFI Committee also got advantage that the DRRDS result was declared and scientists who supported Dr. A K Saxena’s corrupt practices under pressure opened up and exposed the modus of oprendi adopted by Dr. A K Saxena.  FFI Committee also got inputs about nexus between M/s Manglam Trades, Kanpur (Mr.Anish Gupta/Mr. Manish Gupta) and Dr. A K Saxena in various procurement cases.

1.       Reactor case is open case that the procurement was done in coalition  with M/s Manglam Trades because all mails are the perfect evidences of corruption and DRDO Hqrs already aware that CBI, Lucknow have already got all evidences and approached MOD. Payment of Reactor case has not been made till so far even after 18 months the Reactor was installed in January 2013 at DMSRDE.

2.       The case of procurement of Laboratory Microprocessor Based Programmable High Temp.Furnace supplied by M/s   Omega Furnace Industries, Bangalore. In this case illegal Second TPC was done for recommending to make payment  to M/s Manglam Traders, Kanpur.( It can happen only in DRDO)

3.       Fume Hood Chamber procurement case is open example of looting in DRDO.

Common man are waiting to see the impact of new Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi ji’s Government on  DRDO, as Shri Avinash Chander Ji especially mentioned in his address in last JCM that “now new government has come and the accountability is also increased”.

It is coincidence that both FFIC having chairman from Uttarakhand and Uttarakhandies are famous for their honesty and devotion in service. We hope that like Dr. S SNegi, the Chairman of second FFIC Dr. D C Pande will not be hijacked by corrupt nexus of DRDO and he will do justice with DMSRDE people.

Jaihind

 

Distributing Promotion on Platter to Dr A K Singh, Sc G, DOP,DRDO & Sh R K Jain, Sc ‘H’Director, RAC, DRDO

Hello Friends                                                                                           11 June 2014

Today I have received this letter with request to publish it on the website. This is the harsh reality of DRDO, everyone in every Lab & Establishment of DRDO is witnessing the same scenario in DRDS  from Sc ‘B’ to Sc ‘H’, in DRTC Technicians to TO ‘D’, Admin allied, Stores are standing nowhere in DRDO’s priority.PKS

Dr. A K Singh, DOP, DRDO- A perfect example of violation of FCS Rules by DRDO

To                                                                                                         28th April 2014

Sh A K Antony
Defence Minister
Room -104, South Block
New Delhi – 110011

 

SUBJECT: Deliberate Violation of FCS Scheme in DRDO

Sir,

1.       Enclosed please find the report prepared to expose the violation of FCS rules by DRDO authorities.

2.       Dr. A K Singh, present Director of Personal was staff officer to CC R&D,HR in 2004 as Sc’E’

3.       In 2007 and 2011 violating all the norms of DoPT as approved by President of India, Dr. A K Singh was promoted firstly as Scientist ‘F’ and  then Scientist ‘G’

4.        Dr. A K Singh was party as DHRD, DRDO Hqrs with RAC Chairman (then) Dr P S Goel who was amended SRO for which he was not authorized and fabricated the condition where corruption/nepotism/ favoritism could flourished.( Copy of letter issued by Dr P S Goel). This clear-cut violation of Article 309 which was supported by Dr V K Saraswat then SA to RM. Dr V K Saraswat was pioneer in misappropriate of Govt funds, misinterpretation of Govt. rules as resulted the honorable defence minister recommended CBI  intervention against him and nine other top ex officials of DRDO.

5.       Dr A K Singh is big inspiration of incompetent scientists for achieving fast promotions without doing scientific work. The 2014 recent assessment call list reflected the Dr A K Singh’s path, Sh Ashok Sharma, Scientist ‘D’ get assessment call in three years residency period, involved full time working as works officer his big scientific achievement is putting Air conditioners in boss place, placing good tiles and other day to day sundry civil works in premises of INMAS and other important places where the key of outstanding APAR found.

6.       Sir, Ask DRDO that how many scientists and officials are not appearing for assessment, the level of humiliation are in peak because of after working delicately for years and years but superseding by those who are incompetent and doing non scientific works.

7.       The case of Dr A K Singh be thoroughly examined in the light of FCS rules and appropriate action may please be taken for manipulation of SRO which deprived many dedicated scientists to get their due credits. It is directly related to performance and output of DRDO.

8.       Sir, for sake of DORO, for sake of our defence preparedness, for sake of dignity of real scientists, it is requested immediate action and directive is needed to stop the violation of FCS rules.

 

 

With warm regards

 

 

Prabhu Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008
Phone – 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website – www.corruptionindrdo.com
 

 

Enclosed – Brief report – overall DRDS

 

Copy to

 

1.       Sh Avinash Chander, DG DRDO, DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg, New Delhi-110105
2.       Prof. (Dr) D.N. Reddy, Chairman, RAC, Lucknow Road, Timarpur, Delhi-10054

RTI- DRDO- Dr AK Singh is not only Kingh actually he is Super King

To,                                                                                                                         16th April 2014
Dr. RB Sharma, CPIO
DRDO HQ, Min. of Defence
DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg
New Delhi-110011 

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect  of Dr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Scientist  G  is presently holding the charge of DOP, DRDO  at DRDO HQ. He is holding following post in DRDO since January 2007. Details are given as under:

SN    Post                                                  Duration                           Directorate

1.      Staff Officer to CC(R&D) (HR) –    Oct 2004- Dec 2006                DRDO HQ, DRDO,
2.      Director                                                   Jan  2007 – Sep 2010              CEPTAM, DRDO,  
3.      Director                                                   Oct 2010 – 27 Feb 2013         Dte. of  HRD, DRDO HQ,
4.     Director                                                   28 Feb 2013 – till date           DOP, DRDO HQ    

Note:     He was holding the charge of two Directorates as Director, DHRD & Director, DOP from 01 Dec 2012 to 27 Feb 2013

In reference to the above kindly provide the following information under RTI Act 2005.

  1. Procedure/Guidelines/Rules for appointment of Directors in Corporate Directorate/RAC/CEPTAM, DRDO duly approved by DOPT, Government of India.
  2. Criteria for appointment of Directors in Corporate Directorate/RAC/CEPTAM (Seniority/Administrative & Management skill, qualification & experience etc.)
  3. Charter of Duties & Nature of work  carried out by Scientist appointed as:
          I.            Staff Officer to Chief Controller R&D(HR)
        II.            Director, CEPTAM
      III.            Director, DHRD
      IV.            Director, DOP
  1. File noting for appointment of Dr. Ajay Kumar Singh as Staff Officer to CCR&D (HR) & copy of appointment order
  2. File noting for appointment of Dr. Ajay Kumar Singh as Director, CEPTAM & copy of his appointment order
  3. File noting for appointment of Dr. Ajay Kumar Singh as Director, DHRD, DRDO HQ & copy of his appointment order
  4. File noting for appointment of Dr. Ajay Kumar Singh as Director, DOP & copy of his appointment order
  5. List of Scientist considered in the appointment of following post by DRDO Hqrs.
  6. Administrative & Managerial Experience and Educational Qualification of Dr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Scientist F as on Jan 2007 when he was appointed as Director, CEPTAM, DRDO.
1.      Director, CEPTAM  Jan 2007- Sept 2010
2.      Director, DHRD  Oct 2010- Feb 2013
3.      Director, DOP  March 2013- Jan 2014

NOTE – Matter is directly related to corruption and not exempted under Section 24 (1) because  Dr. Ajay Kumar Singh as Director, DHRD was part & parcel of implementing interview in promotion of scientist F to scientist G grade without proper amendment in SRO ( Violation of Article 309).  He was also one of the candidates for scientist F to scientist G promotion in year 2011 assessment.

  1. Please refer CIC decision in File No. CIC/LS/A/2012/002612 dated 22.3.2013 (Dr. Neelam Bhalla Vs. DRDO)-  
  2. Information asked is on Establishment Matter and not exempted u/s 24 of RTI Act as per various decisions of CIC.
  3. File No. CIC/SM/C/2011/001564
  4. CWP No. 12904 of 2009

In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh                    HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE  MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR

under Section 24(4) of the Act which envisaged that nothing contained in this Act shall apply to such intelligence and security organizations A combined reading of these provisions would reveal, only that information is exempted, which is directly effecting and co-related to the “Intelligence” and “Security” of that organization of the State and not otherwise.

Regards
 
Prabhu  Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun -248008 
0135- 2787750,   9411114879,                                                                                                               prabhudoon@gmail.com    www.corruptionindrdo.com

Enclosed- Postal Order No 27F 941938 Rs 10 only

Implementation of Flexible Complimenting Scheme (FCS) Rules with letter and spirit

To                                                                                                         12th April 2014
Sh A K Antony
Defence Minister
Room -104, South Block
New Delhi – 110011

Subject:  Implementation of Flexible Complimenting Scheme (FCS) Rules with letter and spirit  

Honorable Sir,

DRDO has misused, manipulated and override the Flexible Complimenting Scheme (FCS) guide lines issued by DoPT, GOI.

Guidelines – DOPT after 5th,CPC issued comprehensive instructions on FCS in OM No.2/41/97-PIC dated 9.11.98. These have been further reviewed in the light of 6th CPC instructions and modified FCS guidelines issued in OM NO. AB 14017/37/2008-Estt.(RR) dated l0th September, 2010

OM No. AB-14017/36/2011-Estt(RR) dated 21st September 2012 – “FCS should be rigorous with due emphasis on evaluation of scientific and technical knowledge so that only scientists who have to their credit demonstrable achievements or higher level of technical merit are recommended for promotion.”

DRDO Hqrs, however, manipulated the forgoing rules and cleared/ recommended as outstanding to several scientists who are totally engaged in administrative/managerial /sundry tasks/ jobs/ assignments and due to proximity of top officials.

The ultimate looser is the real scientist who are giving their 100% time and efforts, the organization and the poor tax payers of India. This has further encouraged the growing incompetency and real talent leave the organization.

The Key post holder Dr A K Singh, DOP,DRDO is the leading example of violation of  Flexible Complimenting Scheme (FCS) guide lines.  He joined as scientist ‘B’ in 1988 and did science upto 2004 got two promotion in average time.  Since 2004 he is out of scientific work and due to proximity with CC R&D HR as staff officer ( 2004- 2006) managed out of turn promotion superseded lot of devotional scientists. He also managed the post of Director CEPTAM (Non technical assignment) 2007-2010. Then got post Director HRD(2010 – 2013) again  (Non technical assignment) and managed out of turn promotion superseded hundreds  of devotional scientists who deserves as per FCS and has credit demonstrable achievements or higher level of technical merit. But DRDO top bosses are great and override the Flexible Complimenting Scheme (FCS) guide lines issued by DoPT, GOI and blessed and honored Dr A K Singh with Scientist ‘G’ post. He is now working as DOP,DRDO  again  (Full time non technical assignment) and sure about to get scientist ‘H’ promotion  with hope to supersede 283 scientists as his current seniority roll no is 284.

Similarly one more example of violation of  Flexible Complimenting Scheme (FCS) guide lines in mid level Sh Ashok Sharma, Scientist ‘D’ of INMAS, DRDO working as works officer (full time non technical assignment) got outstanding call for promotion of scientist ‘E’ in only three years and ready to superseded 962 scientists as his seniority number is 963.

This is the tip of ice berg and such anti national activity encourage in DRDO has enhance the growing incompetence and has derailed the real goal of DRDO to support and strengthen the defence preparedness of India.

I request you to kindly give appropriate directives to DG DRDO for Implementation of Flexible Complimenting Scheme (FCS) Rules with letter and spirit.  

Thanking you

With warm regards

Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008
Phone – 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website – www.corruptionindrdo.com

RTI – False information Supplied by RTI Cell, DRDO Hqrs

To,                                                                                                                    2nd April 2014
Dr. RB Sharma, CPIO
DRDO HQ, Min. of Defence
DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg
New Delhi-110011                            

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect your RTI Reply No.01/2091/P2014/0054 dated 12 March 2014 DRDO  against my RTI request dated 6 Feb 2014. You informed that “it is stated that the cases for grant of RTI Cell, DRDO Hqrs Incentive are received from respective Labs/Estt in which it is certified that the higher qualifications and the institute are approved by the competent authority. On receipt of such confirmation, the cases are submitted to Ministry of Defence who process each and every cases and issue sanction for grant of Lump Sum Incentives after getting concurrence of the Integrated Finance. However, in case of any doubt regarding verification/ reorganization, the same is thoroughly examined before issuing the sanction. It is also stated here that the lump sum incentive is only one time to promote higher qualification among employees.”

  1. Provide me the certified copy of DOP/DHRD file noting or letter in which they provide you above said information.
  2. Name and designation of DRDO official who signed and provide you above said information.

Note : Matter is directly related to corruption and not exempted under Section 24 (1), as you can verify this with letter of Director of Personal vide letter No DOP/01/03500/Lump sum/M01 dated March 2014 to all Director Lab/Estt/ Dte in Hq dated 11 March 2014 in Para – 1, line- 9 states that “Of late it has been notice that in most of the cases are taken up acquiring higher qualification, recognition of various courses and universities/ institutes by Competent Authority is not verified/ authenticated by Labs prior to sanction of permission. This non verification in the some cases results in award of degrees/ diplomas by Universities / Institutes not recognized by the competent recognizing authorities. Grant of incentives for such higher qualification becomes against the Rules”

Regards

Prabhu  Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun -248008
phone 0135 -2787750 Mobile 0911114879
e-mail id – prabhudoon@gmail.com website -www.corruptionindrdo.com

Registration Number            MODEF/R/2014/60635RTI reply drdo hq fake degree12 marchfake degree dop letterfake degree dop letter page2

 

RTI- Dr. Ajay Kumar Singh – Singh is Kingh

To,                                                                                      31st March 2014
Dr. RB Sharma, CPIO
DRDO HQ, Min. of Defence
DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg
New Delhi-110011                             

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect  of Dr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Scientist  G  is presently holding the charge of DOP, DRDO  at DRDO HQ. He is holding following post in DRDO since January 2007. Details are given as under:

SN    Post                                                 Duration                           Directorate
1.      Staff Officer to CC(R&D) (HR) – Oct 2004- Dec 2006            DRDO HQ, DRDO,
2.      Director                                            Jan  2007 – Sep 2010        CEPTAM, DRDO,  
3.      Director                                            Oct 2010 – 27 Feb 2013   Dte. of  HRD, DRDO HQ,
4.     Director                                           28 Feb 2013 – till date      DOP, DRDO HQ    
Note:     He was holding the charge of two Directorates as Director, DHRD & Director, DOP from 01 Dec 2012 to 27 Feb 2013

In reference to the above kindly provide the following information under RTI Act 2005.

  1. Procedure/Guidelines/Rules for appointment of Directors in Corporate Directorate/RAC/CEPTAM, DRDO duly approved by DOPT, Government of India.
  2. Criteria for appointment of Directors in Corporate Directorate/RAC/CEPTAM (Seniority/Administrative & Management skill, qualification & experience etc.)
  3. Charter of Duties & Nature of work  carried out by Scientist appointed as:
          I.            Staff Officer to Chief Controller R&D(HR)
        II.            Director, CEPTAM
      III.            Director, DHRD
      IV.            Director, DOP
  1. File noting for appointment of Dr. Ajay Kumar Singh as Staff Officer to CCR&D (HR) & copy of appointment order
  2. File noting for appointment of Dr. Ajay Kumar Singh as Director, CEPTAM & copy of his appointment order
  3. File noting for appointment of Dr. Ajay Kumar Singh as Director, DHRD, DRDO HQ & copy of his appointment order
  4. File noting for appointment of Dr. Ajay Kumar Singh as Director, DOP & copy of his appointment order
  5. List of Scientist considered in the appointment of following post by DRDO Hqrs.
  6. Administrative & Managerial Experience and Educational Qualification of Dr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Scientist F as on Jan 2007 when he was appointed as Director, CEPTAM, DRDO.
  1. Director, CEPTAM  Jan 2007- Sept 2010
  2. Director, DHRD  Oct 2010- Feb 2013
  3. Director, DOP  March 2013- Jan 2014

NOTE – Matter is directly related to corruption and not exempted under Section 24 (1) because  Dr. Ajay Kumar Singh as Director, DHRD was part & parcel of implementing interview in promotion of scientist F to scientist G grade without proper amendment in SRO ( Violation of Article 309).  He was also one of the candidates for scientist F to scientist G promotion in year 2011 assessment.

  1. Please refer CIC decision in File No. CIC/LS/A/2012/002612 dated 22.3.2013 (Dr. Neelam Bhalla Vs. DRDO)-  
  2. Information asked is on Establishment Matter and not exempted u/s 24 of RTI Act as per various decisions of CIC.

Regards

Prabhu  Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun -248008 
0135- 2787750,   9411114879,  
prabhudoon@gmail.com    www.corruptionindrdo.com

 

Registration Number    MODEF/R/2014/60617       

RTI – DRDO Hqrs – Corporate

To,                                                                               21st  February 2014
Dr. RB Sharma, CPIO
DRDO HQ, Min. of Defence
DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg
New Delhi-110011                             

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005. In DRDO website under organization chart following corporate directorates are mentioned –

  • DOP
  • DHRD
  • RAC
  • CEPTAM
  • DPI
  • RTI Cell
  • DBFA
  • DV&S
  • DMS
  • DMM
  • DoRB &O&M
  • D Parl Affairs
  • DTC Sectt
  1. Please provide copies of the documents which describe the duties and functions performed by these directorates.
  2. Please provide a copy of the document which indicates the structure of these of these directorates, i.e. the number of posts, level of the post, pay scale, grade pay, total manpower and their duties. If the information is not available at single place, please provide the copies of as many minimum no. of documents which may reveal this information clearly.
  3. What are the qualifications, educational as well as experience, required for the all the posts in these directorates.
  4. Are these posts are sanctioned by Govt of india? Please provide copies of such sanction. If some authority subordinate to Govt of India has authorised/sanctioned these posts, please provide copies of order creating/authorising these posts.
  5. Please provide copies of the SROs of the posts of Directors of these directorates.
  6. Please provide the copy of the document which can indicate the decision making process regarding the functions of these directorates.
  7. Are CVC guidelines of maximum no. of service in particular post is applicable to the posts of these directorates. If, yes please provide copies of the documents (a minimal set) which can indicate that no default has been made on this ground.
  8. What is the level of automation of these directorates   Is there any document which can indicate the level of automation in these directorates  If so, please provide a copy of the same.
  9. Total burden to the exchequer on running these directorates
  10. Have any studies been made to find out that these directorates are really in worth. If so, please provide a copy of the same.
  11. Have any studies been made by DRDO for downsizing these directorates. If so, please provide a copy of the same.
  12. Is there was ever any bar on recruitment of administrative cadre officers in DRDO? If so, please provide a copy of the same.
  13. Who is the Head of Office of a DRDO lab as per rule 14 of Delegation of Financial Power Rules, 1978  Please provide a copy of the order in this regard.
Regards
Prabhu  Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur,
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website www.corruptionindrdo.com

 

 Registration Number                MODEF/R/2014/60343