All posts by Prabhu

Drdo

DRDO’s Good days are coming

2 Comments

DRDO’s  Good days are coming – Dadagiri of DRDO scientists who are looking administration & HR of DRDO and passage of time they piled up hundreds of court cases and created lot of grievances and frustration among honest devoted officials. The incompetency of handling administrative, HR, recruitment and promotion matters one of the major reason of unproductiveness of DRDO.

The following answer given by Sh Manohar Parrikar in Rajya Sabha giving us some hope of Good are coming

 

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

MINISTRY OF  DEFENCE

RAJYA SABHA

QUESTION NO 2119 ANSWERED ON  17.03.2015

Overhauling of the DRDO and DPSUs

2119    Shri Rajeev Chandrasekhar

Will the Minister of DEFENCE be pleased to satate :-

(a) whether Government plans to overhaul the functioning of the DRDO and the Defence PSUs in order to realise Make in India programme targets for the defence sector; and

(b) if so, the detailed plan and roadmap for the same?

ANSWER

MINISTER OF DEFENCE

(SHRI MANOHAR PARRIKAR)

(a) & (b): The functioning of Defence Research and Development Organization (DRDO) was reviewed by a Committee headed by Prof. P. Rama Rao. DRDO has accepted several recommendations which inter-alia include creation of Seven Technology Domain based Clusters headed by Director’s General; Restructuring of DRDO HQrs; Creation of Directorate of Quality, Reliability and Safety (QR&S); increase in budget for Extramural Research; creation of empowered Defence Technology Commission (DTC); creation of a Commercial Arm of DRDO; creation of 5 Senior Administrative Grade (SAG) posts along with 162 other posts for full scale implementation of Integrated Financial Advisor (IFA) Scheme etc.

Recently, a review of all DRDO Projects along with the three Services, OFB and Defence Public Sector Undertakings (DPSUs) has been carried out so as to realign the focus towards the “Make in India” Programme. Also, more than 1000 small, medium and large Indian industries have been involved in the development and productionisation of products for the delivery to the Services.

With the objective of achieving self-reliance in defence production, the DPSUs have been continuously modernizing and upgrading their capabilities and widening their product range. Some of the DPSUs have also collaborated with DRDO and other R&D institutions in this regard. There is also increasing emphasis on partnerships of DPSUs with the private sector for sourcing various components so that DPSUs can play the role of system integrators and become more competitive.

PMO

न्‍यूज 24 एक्‍सक्‍लूसिव: मोदी को शिकायत करना इस वैज्ञानिक को पड़ा महंगा on March 20, 2015 8:08 pm

2 Comments

संजीव त्रिवेदी, नई दिल्ली (20 मार्च): प्रधानमंत्री नरेंद्र मोदी अपने मन की बात कार्यक्रम में पूरे देश से अपील करते हैं कि उन्हें सुझाव भेजिए। बताइए कि कैसे देश का भला किया जा सकता है। ऐसे में एक वैज्ञानिक सीधे प्रधानमंत्री दफ्तर को अपना सुझाव और शिकायत भेजते हैं। इस उम्मीद के साथ कि सरकार सुझाव के बारे में और जानकारी मांगेगी, शिकायत की जांच करेगी। लेकिन हुआ क्या। इसके आगे का पूरा सच आप जानेंगे तो कहीं आपका विश्वास सरकारी महकमों में सबसे ऊपर प्रधानमंत्री कार्यालय के काम करने के तरीके से ना उठ जाए।

28 सितंबर 2014 यही वो तारीख थी, जब वैज्ञानिक पशुपति राव ने सीधे प्रधानमंत्री कार्यालय की वेबसाइट पर एक सुझाव शिकायत के साथ दर्ज कराई। जिसमें उन्होंने कोटा में नेशनल फ्यूल कॉम्प्लेक्स का सेंटर बनाने में हुई गड़बड़ियों का जिक्र किया। वैज्ञानिक पशुपतिराव ने प्रधानमंत्री कार्यालय को बताया कि बाहर से एक्सपर्ट को अनुबंधित करने के नाम पर रिटायर्ड अफसरों को ही चुन लिया गया। 5 करोड़ का बजट बनाकर 16 लाख में काम पूरा किया गया। जबकि इतना पैसा खर्च करने की भी जरूरत नहीं थी क्योंकि सक्षम अफसरों के गैरवाजिब पदों पर बैठाकर संस्थान उनका इस्तेमाल नहीं कर रहा।

आप सोच रहे होंगे कि जब प्रधानमंत्री खुद देश के हित में जनता की भागीदारी चाहते हैं तो जरूर उन्होंने वैज्ञानिक पशुपतिराव के सुझाव और शिकायत पर जरूरी कदम उठाए होंगे। लेकिन इसके आगे क्या हुआ। आप जानकर चौंक जाएंगे। जो सुझाव और शिकायतें वैज्ञानिक पशुपतिराव ने प्रधानमंत्री कार्यालय को भेजी थीं। उनकी जांच कराने की जगह PMO ने उन्हीं के पास भेज दिया, जिनकी शिकायत की गई थी। इसके बाद वैज्ञानिक के विभाग में हंगामा मच गया। शिकायत करने वाले पशुपति राव को ही विभाग ने चिट्ठी दे दी। जिसमें लिखा गया आपको जो काम मिला है। उस पर ध्यान दीजिए। आपने स्टाफ की शिकायत की है। आगे भी सवाल जवाब होंगे।

हालांकि पशुपति राव के बारे में जब उनके विभाग से न्यूज 24 ने सवाल पूछा तो दावा किया गया कि कोई एक्शन नहीं लिया जाएगा। लेकिन सच पशुपति राव को मिली ये वो चिट्ठी भी है, जो न्यूज 24 के पास है, जिसमें साफ साफ लिखा है कि आप अपने काम पर ध्यान दें। प्रधानमंत्री कार्यालय के कामकाज को संभाल चुके राज्य मंत्री रहे नारायण सामी बताते हैं कि मोदी के ऑफिस की तरफ से बड़ी गलती हुई है जबकि मौजूदा मंत्री को तो पूरे मामले की खबर तक नहीं।

प्रधानमंत्री कार्यालय एक शिकायत को जांच करने की जगह उसी अफसर के पास भेज देता है जिसकी शिकायत की गई है और पीएमओ का कामकाज देखने वाले मंत्री कहते हैं कि जानकारी नहीं है। संभव है कि वो मामले को टालना चाहते हैं क्योंकि पशुपति राव के मामले में जो लापरवाही प्रधानमंत्री कार्यालय ने बरती है उसे लेकर सूचना के सिपाही प्रभु डॉड्रियाल ने पीएमओ में एक आरटीआई लगाई और इस आरटीआई का जवाब अब तक मोदी का कार्यालय तलाश ही रहा है। क्योंकि यही बताया गया है कि आपके सवाल का जवाब ढूंढने की प्रकिया जारी है।

प्रधानमंत्री कार्यालय ने अपने विभाग से जुड़ी शिकायत करने वाले वैज्ञानिक पशुपति राव की पहचान जाहिर की तो अब तक उन्हें सिर्फ कुछ हिदायती चिट्ठी और आगे सवाल जवाब के लिए तैयार रहने के लिए कहा गया है। लेकिन पीएमओ से हुई इस चूक ने याद दिलाई है 12 साल पहले प्रधानमंत्री कार्यालय से हुई बड़ी लापरवाही को। 12 साल पहले सत्येंद्र दुबे नाम के ईमानदार अफसर ने अपने विभाग में भ्रष्टाचार की सच्चाई प्रधानमंत्री कार्यालय तक पहुंचाई तो उसके बदले मौत दे दी गई।

सत्येंद्र दुबे नेशनल हाइवे अथॉरिटी में प्रोजेक्ट डायरेक्टर के पद पर थे। उन्होंने अपने विभाग में हो रहे भ्रष्टाचार का पूरा सच चिट्ठी में लिखकर प्रधानमंत्री कार्यालय के भेजा था। सत्येंद्र दुबे ने गुजारिश की थी कि उनका नाम जाहिर ना किया जाए। लेकिन तब पीएमओ ने सत्येंद्र दुबे के नाम के साथ उस चिट्ठी को कई विभागों को जारी किया था और फिर 27 नवंबर 2003 को सत्येंद्र दुबे की हत्या कर दी गई थी। 12 साल बाद पीएमओ ने फिर एक लापरवही की। गनीमत है कि इस बार सिर्फ शिकायतकर्ता को विभाग की तरफ से सवाल जवाब का ही सामना करना पड़ रहा है। लेकिन ये एक चेतावनी की घंटी है। क्योंकि अब पीएमओ ने ऐसी लापरवाही बरती तो जनता का वो भरोसा चूर चूर हो जाएगा, जो प्रधानमंत्री देते हैं।

Uncategorized

RTI- Minister Department of Telecom – Hatred Attitude towards SC community

Leave a comment

To                                                                                                                    17th March 2015

Sh. R.K. Soni,Director (AS I) & CPIO,                                                                                           Room No.1203, Sanchar Bhawan                                                                                           Department of Telecommunications,                                                                                             Ministry of Communications and IT,                                                                                              20, Ashoka Road, New Delhi 110001

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of letter by Sh. Anil Kumar Pipal, Scientist E, Department of Electronics, MICT,GOI addressed to honorable Minister Sh Ravi Shankar Prasad dated 12/01/2015 Subject (Review Promotion Hatred Attitude towards SC community)

  1. Status of representation of Anil Kumar Pipal, Scientist E, Department of Electronics, MICT,GOI.
  2. Certified copy of action taken noting by Sh.R.K.Agarwal, Sc ‘H’, DEAl, DRDO, Dehradun
  3. Certified copy of reply on subject matter any received by Minister
  4. Certified copy of reply if any sends to Sh. Anil Kumar Pipal, E, Department of Electronics, MICT, GOI.

Regards
Prabhu Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur,
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com website www.corruptionindrdo.com

Registration Number         DOTEL/R/2015/60454

Letter_to_Honble_MCIT
Hatred Attitude towards SC community allegation by Sh. Anil Kumar Pipal, Scientist E, Department of Electronics, MICT,GOI against Sh.R.K.Agarwal, Sc ‘H’, DEAl, DRDO, Dehradun

 

Uncategorized

RTI-CVO,MoD- Complaints Status – Dr A K Saxena, Director, DMSRDE, Kanpur

1 Comment

To                                                                                                                  17th March 2015              Sh. Sekhar Ranjan Amin, U/Secretary & CPIO,                                                                         Room No – 340, Office of Director of Vigilance,                                                                           B- Wing Sena Bhawan,Rajaji Marg,                                                                                               New Delhi -110105

Hello,

Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of corruption complaints against Dr A K Saxena, Director, DMSRDE, DRDO, Kanpur & other officials.  The period of complaints   is from 29/11/2013 to 11/06/2014.

  1. Provide the current status of my following complaints
  • Dated 29/11/2013 OM No 1323/2014/vigilance 9, forwarded to CVO, MoD on 30/01/2014 for necessary action.
  • Dated 17/12/2013 OM No 2056/2014/vigilance 9, forwarded to CVO, MoD on 19/02/2014 for necessary action
  • Dated 24/12/2013 OM No 5022/2014/vigilance 9, forwarded to CVO, MoD on dated 27/03/2014 for necessary action
  • Dated 26/12/2013 OM No 4979/2014/vigilance 9, forwarded to CVO, MoD on dated 27/03/2014 for necessary action
  • Dated 22/1/2014 OM No 5387/2014/vigilance 9, forwarded to CVO, MoD on dated 31/03/2014 for necessary action
  • Dated 7/1/2014 OM No 3617/2014/vigilance 9, forwarded to CVO, MoD on dated 14/03/2014 for necessary action
  • Dated15/1/2014 OM No 3574/2014/vigilance 9, forwarded to CVO, MoD on dated 10/03/2014 for necessary action
  • Dated 11/6/2014 OM No 13248/2014/vigilance 9, forwarded to CVO, MoD on dated 24/06/2014 for necessary action
  1. CVO, MoD forwarded to DRDO vigilance vide MoD ID note No. 63/DO/ (Vig)/CVC/2014 dated 17/06/2014 with request to submit consolidated report on the complaints against Dr A.K. Saxena and others of DMSRDE, DRDO, Kanpur at the earliest. Please provide the copy of reply of DRDO against your request.
  2. Provide copies of replies received by CVO,MoD against above complaints.

Regards
Prabhu Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur,
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com website www.corruptionindrdo.com

Registration Number         MODEF/R/2015/60687

Corruption Complaints Status against Dr A K Saxena, Director, DMSRDE, DRDO, Kanpur & other officials working with him
Corruption Complaints Status against Dr A K Saxena, Director, DMSRDE, DRDO, Kanpur & other officials
Corruption Complaints Status against Dr A K Saxena, Director, DMSRDE, DRDO, Kanpur & other officials working with him
Corruption Complaints Status against Dr A K Saxena, Director, DMSRDE, DRDO, Kanpur & other officials working with him
PMO

RTI- Nuclear Fuel Complex, Hyderabad – PMO portal case

Leave a comment

To                                                                                                                Date 15th March 2015
Shri S. Goverdhan Rao,                                                                                                                      CPIO & Dy. Chief Executive (Administration),                                                                             Nuclear Fuel Complex,                                                                                                                     Department of Atomic Energy Government of India,                                                               Hyderabad – 500 062.

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of NFC s Response to the Misleading report carried by Economic Times on 13.3.2015, posted on http://www.nfc.gov.in/ in reference of following points.

Point No 7. Against NFC s advertisements for hiring external professionals for the Project Management Consultancy jobs offers were received from outside and retired Officers of NFC. After evaluation, four retired Officers were selected and awarded the Consultancy contract for review Engineering documents and drawings prepared by Detailed Engineering Consultants i.e., M/s. Engineering India Limited.

Point No 8. While sanction for Project Management Consultancy at an estimated cost of Rs. 5 Crores was available, NFC managed to get the work done by spending only Rs. 16.15 lakhs by engaging retired Officers as Consultants, which NFC saved huge amount and considerable time in the process.

Point No 9. Shri Pasupathi Rao was informed of the factual position.

  1. Provide the total number of job offer other than retired officer from NFC, their names and qualification, experience which they have submitted with said offer.
  2. Name board members and name of chairman who selected four retired officer.
  3. Whether any of these four retired officer involved in planning or any means with Green Field Project at Kota earlier when they were in NFC.
  4. Provide the copy of justification given for budgeting estimated cost of Rs 5 crores in the name of Project Management Consultancy for Green Field Project at Kota.
  5. The total amount as salary, as transport allowances, medical allowances, TA/DA, communication bills and any other payments was given to these four retired officer as consultant of above said project up to 28th Feb 2015.
  6. The copy of information given to the factual position to Shri Pasupathi Rao as stated in point no 9 of NFC response.

Regards
Prabhu Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur,
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com website www.corruptionindrdo.com

Registration Number      DOATE/R/2015/60170

PMO

Senior nuclear scientist faces wrath of offering suggestions to PM Modi

Leave a comment

India TV News Desk [ Updated 13 Mar 2015, 12:22:05
New Delhi: One of India’s senior nuclear scientists, Pashupati Rao, who works at Nuclear Fuel Complex (NFC) run by the Department of Atomic Energy (DAE) is now facing wrath for sending suggestions to Prime Minister Narendra Modi on a critical national project.

On 28 September, 2014, Rao had sent his suggestions including sensitive matters on the new nuclear complex to PM’s official portal (pmindia.gov.in), which PMO had further sent to Rao’s employer, DAE, marking them as ‘grievance’ and sent out another mail to Rao on January 21 this year, saying his ‘grievance’ has been disposed.

The PMO, in its communication to DAE, had revealed Rao’s name and designation, thus making his full identity known to his superiors.

Following this, DAE persistently started following up with Rao asking for explanations while the latter desperately continued to explain himself.

As published in Economic Times, some DAE officials on condition of anonymity even said that Rao may face serious consequences.

Prominent whistleblower Prabhu Dandriyal, who some years ago had claimed to have exposed corruption in Defence Research & Development Organization, filed a Right to Information application on January 27 this year with the PMO on Rao’s matter.

Dandriyal, in his RTI application demanded to know the guidelines followed by PMO while dealing with sensitive matters. He told that the PMO reply that came a month later, on February 27, said the request is being processed, and details are being collected.

In the Rao’s suggestions to the Prime Minister, he had proposed that an independent team be appointed to review the project and he also mentioned technical details on cutting costs in it.

However, the PMO having sent his suggestions as ‘grievance’ to DAE has put the top nuclear scientist in a bureaucratic nightmare.

The communication that happened with PMO was with NFC, Hyderabad, where Rao worked.

His matter was turned into a staff grievance. Although the scientist tried hard to explain his stand however, nothing worked in his favor.

In one of the communications to the Grievance Redressal Committee, Rao wrote, “I am a successful officer and I have been awarded with DAE group achievement award for indigenization associated work. My feedback given to the PMO which is converted as my grievance is not aimed at any individual.”

However, DAE has not relented and on February 10, it had sent out a letter to Rao reminding him that his job was limited to helping him in maintenance of NFC.

“As an organization, we will follow the process. As he is a staff member, it is being treated as a staff grievance and is being looked into,” S Goverdhan Rao, deputy chief executive of NFC, told ET.

Meanwhile, Dandriyal is still awaiting a full reply from the PMO. He says, “It will be very difficult for people from the system to come out and expose corruption and inefficiency if there is no mechanism to protect them.”

PMO

Prime Minister’s Office Marked Rao’s Mail as `Grievance’

14 Comments

Mar 13 2015 : The Economic Times (Delhi)

Lands in hot water with DAE bosses for writing to PM
He wrote to the prime minister, tried to do good for a critical national project, and now he’s in trouble.
One of India’s senior nuclear scientists, Pashupati Rao, who works at Nuclear Fuel Complex (NFC), run by the Department of Atomic Energy (DAE), is now battling his employer for having written to the prime minister offering suggestions on streamlining the setting up of a new nuclear facility at Kota, Rajasthan. DAE comes under the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO).

ET has reviewed the relevant correspondence between the PMO, DAE and the scientist. The PMO didn’t respond to ET’s queries on this matter.Rao did not participate in this story.DAE responded to ET’s questions. On September 28, 2014, Rao sent his suggestions to PM’s official portal (pmindia.gov.in), which invites citizens to share ideas as well as to write to the Prime Minister.

But although Rao had communicated sensitive matters on the new nuclear complex, the PMO had sent them to Rao’s employer, DAE, marking them as `grievance’, and it sent a mail to Rao on January 21 this year, saying his `grievance’ has been disposed. The PMO’s communication to Rao’s employers had also given the name and designation of the scientist, thus making his full identity known to his superiors.

This started a process of DAE relentlessly asking for explanations from the scientist and the latter desperately seeking to explain himself. Some DAE officials who did not want to be identified told ET that Rao may face serious consequences.

Prominent whistleblower Prabhu Dandriyal, who some years ago had claimed to have exposed corruption in Defence Research & Development Organisation, filed a Right to Information application on January 27 this year with the PMO on Rao’s matter.

Dandriyal had asked what guidelines the PMO follows when dealing with `sensitive’ communication from government officials. He said the PMO reply that came a month later, on February 27, said the request is being processed, and de tails are being collected.

Rao’s suggestions sent to the prime minister on the Kota project contained, apart from technical details on cutting costs, a proposal that an independent team be appointed to review the project.

BUREAUCRATIC NIGHTMARE

But the PMO sending his suggestions as `grievance’ to DAE has put the top nuclear scientist in a bureaucratic nightmare.The PMO’s communications were sent to NFC, Hyderabad, where Rao worked, and his superiors have turned the matter into `staff grievance’ and have been seeking explanations from Rao.

In a series of communications, Rao tried to explain that he did not have any personal grievance.

“I am a successful officer and I have been awarded with DAE group achievement award for indigenisation associated work. My feedback given to the PMO which is converted as my grievance is not aimed at any individual,“ the scientist wrote in one of his attempts to explain himself. However, DAE has not relented and on February 10, Rao received a letter from the Grievance Redressal Committee that reminded him his job was limited to helping in the maintenance of NFC.et clip

“As an organisation, we will follow the process. As he is a staff member, it is being treated as a staff grievance and is being looked into,“ S Goverdhan Rao, deputy chief executive of NFC, told ET.

Dandriyal, who’s still awaiting a full reply from PMO, said, “It will be very difficult for people from the system to come out and expose corruption and inefficiency if there is no mechanism to protect them.“

Drdo

Nuclear scientist lands in trouble with DAE for sending suggestions to PM Narendra Modi

1 Comment

By ET Bureau | 13 Mar, 2015, 04.00AM IST
By Manu Pubby

NEW DELHI: He wrote to the prime minister, tried to do good for a critical national project, and now he’s in trouble. One of India’s senior nuclear scientists, Pashupati Rao, who works at Nuclear Fuel Complex (NFC), run by the Department of Atomic Energy (DAE), is now battling his employer for having written to the prime minister offering suggestions on streamlining the setting up of a new nuclear facility at Kota, Rajasthan. DAE comes under the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO).nuclear-plant_bccl

ET has reviewed the relevant correspondence between the PMO, DAE and the scientist. The PMO didn’t respond to ET’s queries on this matter. Rao did not participate in this story. DAE responded to ET’s questions.

On September 28, 2014, Rao sent his suggestions to PM’s official portal (pmindia. gov.in), which invites citizens to share ideas as well as to write to the Prime Minister.

But although Rao had communicated sensitive matters on the new nuclear complex, the PMO had sent them to Rao’s employer, DAE, marking them as ‘grievance’, and it sent a mail to Rao on January 21 this year, saying his ‘grievance’ has been disposed.

nfcThe PMO’s communication to Rao’s employers had also given the name and designation of the scientist, thus making his full identity known to his superiors. This started a process of DAE relentlessly asking for explanations from the scientist and the latter desperately seeking to explain himself. Some DAE officials who did not want to be identified told ET that Rao may face serious consequences.

Prominent whistleblower Prabhu Dandriyal, who some years ago had claimed to have exposed corruption in Defence Research & Development Organisation, filed a Right to Information application on January 27 this year with the PMO on Rao’s matter.

Dandriyal had asked what guidelines the PMO follows when dealing with ‘sensitive’ communication from government officials. He said the PMO reply that came a month later, on February 27, said the request is being processed, and details are being collected. Rao’s suggestions sent to the prime minister on the Kota project contained, apart from technical details on cutting costs, a proposal that an independent team be appointed to review the project.

BUREAUCRATIC NIGHTMARE

But the PMO sending his suggestions as ‘grievance’ to DAE has put the top nuclear scientist in a bureaucratic nightmare.

The PMO’s communications were sent to NFC, Hyderabad, where Rao worked, and his superiors have turned the matter into staff grievance’ and have been seeking explanations from Rao. In a series of communications, Rao tried to explain that he did not have any personal grievance.

“I am a successful officer and I have been awarded with DAE group achievement award for indigenisation associated work. My feedback given to the PMO which is converted as my grievance is not aimed at any individual,” the scientist wrote in one of his attempts to explain himself. However, DAE has not relented and on February 10, Rao received a letter from the Grievance Redressal Committee that reminded him his job was limited to helping in the maintenance of NFC.

“As an organisation, we will follow the process. As he is a staff member, it is being treated as a staff grievance and is being looked into,” S Goverdhan Rao, deputy chief executive of NFC, told ET.

Dandriyal, who’s still awaiting a full reply from PMO, said, “It will be very difficult for people from the system to come out and expose corruption and inefficiency if there is no mechanism to protect them.”

Uncategorized

Fake DEAL Awards – letter received by Website

9 Comments

Dear friends in every Labs/Establishments of DRDO, Directors are having absolute powers and they are using these powers not in the interest of organization or nor in the interest of lab officials. In maximum cases all facilities provided by DRDO like infrastructures, encouragements monetary benefits like, cash awards, phone facilities, participation in Seminars, Workshop or other trainings all are reserved for chamchas.

The following letter I have received from DEAL’s friends via post, which is an analytical explanation of DEAL director Sh R C Agarwal’s management capabilities, his love to chamchas and community, with great Sh R K Agarwal who joined hands to fulfillment of desire of outgoing director.

From today onward Sh R C Agarwal, Director, DEAL, Dehradun  will be busy for arrangement of fair well of his cluster DG, Sh S S Sundaram who is in his last tour to Dehradun, he called his all cluster directors like his (Lal) Sh Haribabu, Srivastava, Director LASTEC, Delhi, Taxi Bill expert Ms Manjula, Director, DARE, Bangalore, Director, DLRL etc.

As per sources he like Tea……r so Dr S S Negi, Director, IRDE & future DG, ECS will be host and all other directors are coming in the name of cluster meeting and planning to give grand fair well party to great Sh S S Sundaram, only thing is left that Sh R C Agarwal after giving several CARS project to Deemed University Graphic Era not able to make Sundaram as Dr before his departure from DRDO. RC opens his all gates for Dr B S Jasal, Ex DEAL scientist but failed procure PhD for his boss & himself till date, hope Sundaram will get PhD in short time which will be helpful to fit in courtier of Dr V K Sarswat’s NITI Ayog, God Bless him, God Bless India.

Following Letter received by Website

Lab level fake awardsLab level fake awards1Lab level fake awards2