Tag Archives: Raipur

Drdo

Sharply increasing the number of Court Cases in DRDO

6 Comments
To                                                                                                       1st September 2014
Sh Arun Jaietly Ji,
Defence Minister,
Room No 104, South Block,
New Delhi – 110011

Subject:  Sharply increasing the number of Court Cases in DRDO

Sir,

The DRDO top officials are not bothering the increasing numbers of court cases. It is not linear increase but it is in multifold, from CAT to High Court followed to Supreme Court.

As a learned lawyer you can very well understand the clients mental status when someone involve in court. Scientists or technical official who are engaged in court business than expectation of product output from them is futile.

If you ask your scientific adviser the figure of court cases and court expenses of last five years along with solicitor general’s advices or legal cell advices in which they deny for further move but the ego of DRDO’s top brass are very high.

Sir, you have check the payments to lawyers some time DRDO using project funds illegally and the scientists are also involved to attend court cases in the name of technical discussion in nearby DRDO or other establishment.

In RTI, DRDO will not provide the number of cases running in various courts across the country but certainly you will able to get data of cases and number of scientist and technical officials are involved. Number is alarming i.e. in thousand.

For example one simple case of tenure transfer of scientist is enclosed. In which you can understand the level of ego of senior DRDO officials compel to scientist go to the court and waste his hard earn money and suffer unnecessary. Dr. Vijay Veer, Director, DRL, Tezpur’s ego and his incompetency resulted to this CAT case.

As our Prime Minster said in his 15th August speech that he observed that in ministries department running as their own jagir and this clear cut accurately fit with DRDO working.

With great hope that you will certainly look into the matter and asked to correct this court business in DRDO.

Regards
 
Prabhu Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008
Phone – 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website – www.corruptionindrdo.com

Order of CAT Bench Guhwati in DRDO matter
Order of CAT Bench Guhwati in DRDO matter
Order of CAT Bench Guhwati in DRDO matter
Order of CAT Bench Guhwati in DRDO matter
Order of CAT Bench Guhwati in DRDO matter
Order of CAT Bench Guhwati in DRDO matter
Order of CAT Bench Guhwati in DRDO matter
Order of CAT Bench Guhwati in DRDO matter

Dr. A K Singh’s not able to handle DOP matter this is another failure in his part

Drdo

RTI- HRD- DIPAS, DRDO Scientist Smt Geetha’s fake certificate case (Dr W Selvamurty’s daughter)

Leave a comment
To                                                        26th August 2014
Sh. Rajesh Kumar Singh,
CPIO,Under Secretary,
Room No. 236-C, SHASTRI BHAWAN,
RAJENDRA PRASAD ROAD,
NEW DELHI – 110 001

Hello,

Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005 in respect of representation/complaint to Honorable Minister Smt. Smriti Zubin Irani dated 3rd June 2014 Subject: Fake Experience Certificate issued from Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Centre for Bio-medical Research North Campus, Delhi University.

  1. Certified Copy of remark/note by Minister Smt. Smriti Zubin Irani
  2. Present status  of representation/complaint
  3. Certified Copy of reply received from Delhi University on subject matter.
  4. Certified Copy of any other action by HRD on subject matter
Regards
Prabhu  Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun
Ph   0135 2787750, Mobile 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website   www.corruptionindrdo.com

Registration Number       DOHED/R/2014/64019

Uncategorized

DRDO lab Directors expert in manipulations whether it is Software Radio or Atrocities on SC/ST

Leave a comment

An official of DEAL, DRDO Sh. Jagdish Kumar, Technical Officer ‘C’ reported to SSP, Dehradun against the crime committed by Sh. R K Agarwal, Scientist ‘H’ Principal Associate Director, (Farzi Designation because as per RTI information there is no such gazette notification), DEAL.

Thanks to RTI Act 2005 which is strong and effective weapon against corrupt officials.

RTI revealed that Sh R C Agarwal fully supported and extended all his official powers to protect his Agarwal bandhu Sh. R K Agarwal, Sc ‘H’

  1. SSP, Dehradun same day i.e. 4/6/2014 sent Sh. Jagdish Kumar, Technical Officer ‘C’ to Thana Raipur for inquiry.
  2. SHO, Raipur Thana assigned the task to Sub Inspector B P Singh on same day i.e. 4/6/2014
  3. Sub Inspector B P Singh did not look into the matter seriously. After many requests he visited DEAL, DRDO campus on 3/7/2014 and met Sh. R K Agarwal in his office, in the company of Sh K Sivakumar, Sc ‘G’, Dr R S Pundir,  Sc ’G’, Sh Dilip Kumar, Sc ’F’, Sh Atul Dev, Sc ‘F’, Sh VVS Panwar, TO ‘C’, working as Security officer, Sh Balwant, Senior Security Assistant.
  4. Sub Inspector B P Singh submitted his investigation report with conclusion that matter is not worthy of further inquiry and is not fit for registration of FIR.
  5. As per RTI reply it clearly shows Sub Inspector B P Singh sent his final report on 3/7/2014.

Actual facts

  1. Sub Inspector B P Singh visited DEAL on 7/7/2014 and met Sh. R K Agarwal in the chamber of Sh RC Agarwal and collected few useless, unrelated paper, un-certified papers which he annexed with his final report, he forgot the date of final report i.e. 3/7/2014.
  2.  Sub Inspector B P Singh called Sh Jagdish Kumar, applicant on 8/7/2014 at 12.00 hrs and wrote down his statement; again he forgot the date of final report i.e. 3/7/2014.
  3. Per Sub Inspector B P Singh’s report he has not asked any question to Sh R K Agrawal about the allegation made by sh Jagdish Kumar with certified proof of Sh R K Agrawal’s act and deeds, the person who was harassed  by Sh R K Agrawal
  4. Sh RC Agarwal managed the show by offering tea to Sub Inspector B P Singh or like as he already authenticated Sh R K Agarwal false claim of showing association in prestigious project ‘NARAD’ for his promotion to Sc H and because of Sh RC Agarwal illegal act of nepotism so many senior deserving scientist not get their due credits,
  5. Sub Inspector B P Singh’s report is false and produced under pressure of Sh RC Agarwal & Sh R K Agarwal but they forgot that truth cannot be hidden by any means.
  6. The CC TV footage and DEAL official’s are witness of Sub Inspector B P Singh’s visit on 7/7/2014, poor Sub Inspector B P Singh does not know the Sh RC Agarwal & Sh R K Agarwal’s capability of manipulation skills, they are fooling the country men for 100 crores project, Sub Inspector is mere insect for these duo.rep to SSP 25 aug 2014 rep to SSP 25 aug 20141 rep to SSP 25 aug 20142rti reply by policerti reply by police1rti reply by police1.1rti reply by police2rti reply by police3rti reply by police4rti reply by police5rti reply by police6rti reply by police7rti reply by police8rti reply by police9rti reply by police10rti reply by police11rti reply by police12rti reply by police13
Drdo

INTENT FOR CRIMINAL MISCONDUCT UNDER SECTION 13(1)(d) of PC ACT 1988 in PROCUREMENT OF FUME HOOD AT DMSRDE KANPUR BY DIRECTOR, DMSRDE, KANPUR

Leave a comment
To
Dr D C Pande,
Scientist ‘H’, Outstanding Scientist
For DS up gradation list 2014 seniority no 10
Chairman 2nd Fact finding Committee constituted for DMSRDE corruption
LRDE, DRDO, Bangalore   

Subject – Intent for corruption & criminal misconduct u/s 13(1)(d)of PC Act 1988 by Director, DMSRDE

Reference – Complaint to CVC – DMSRDE FUME HOOD PROCUREMENT CASE dated 22 January 2014 on the subject “Corruption in procurement of Fume Hoods in DMSRDE Kanpur officers involved in procurement”.

Sir,

For your kind attention on the complaint under reference on the subject cited above. In this procurement case Scientists of DMSRDE, DRDO were involved.

DGR&D, DRDO is trying to protect the corrupt Scientists of DMSRDE who involved in Corruption by means of illegal FFIC. In this series he constituted two FFIC which made investigation on 13-14 March 2014 and 9-10 July 2014. First FFIC gave clean chit to Dr. AK Saxena and beyond their constitutional rights recommended two scientists transfers as penalty. This is the example case in government department where fact finding committee chairman acts as judge or DRDO Hqrs’s top management used him for unconstitutional act. This brilliant idea was came from the Dr. W Selvamurty’s great चेला ( who is running DRDO administration because everyone knows that our DRDO, DG is always busy with cooking, out of the way promotion and directorships for his ………….., so he leaves all the conspiracy acts to his administrative man like his predecessor did. Beside the whole organization witnessed the exemplary result of Dr. Arun Kumar, the predecessor’s  Great चेला .

It is not new for DRDO, DRDO never take lessons from the failure of projects, that’s why Hon’ PM said on 19th August 2014 to DRDO’s so called ऋषि  leave the “चलताहै ” attitude.

The report of second FFIC is still awaited, GOD knows what will Pande ji do, it is very interesting to see his report outcome and maybe you are waiting for DS list.

Bye they way please go through some astonishing facts of only one case as a example which establish how tampering of evidences and fabrication of documents took place in DMSRDE.

Under the various guidelines of CVC, Hon’ble Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, the intent/intention for criminal misconduct is sufficient ground for section 13(1)(d) of PC Act 1988.

The DMSRDE scientists are involved in Criminal Misconduct under section 13(1)(d) of PC Act 1988 which is established by following facts.

  1. Supply Order of Rs. 45,76,005.00 was issued to KAN-THT (INDIA) Pvt. Ltd., Delhi vide SO No. 14AT0089 dated 19 November 2013.(Copy Enclosed)
  2. Original Delivery Period (ODP) was 28 Feb 2014.
  3. Complaint was made to CVC on 22 January 2014.
  4. Supply Order was cancelled by Director, DMSRDE under planned conspiracy between Director, DMSRDE and KAN-THT India, Delhi.
  5. Commercial Invoice No.  BIOBASE20140123IN dated 22 and 23 January 2014 was issued from JINAN BIOBASE BIOTECH CO. LTD., CHINA to KAN-THT in the name of DMSRDE, Kanpur, I don’t think corrupt official of DMSRDE even know about this. (Copy of the Invoice is enclosed.
  6. From Invoice of Biobase, China it is quite evident that KAN-THTwas mediator in whole procurement deal and SO was issued to KAN-THT not to Biobase, China. Since SO was issued to KAN-THT India, Delhi then how Biobase, China issued Commercial Invoice of the Fume Hoods on name of DMSRDE, Kanpur.
  7. The price of 14 No.  of Fume Hood 1200C as per invoice dated 22 and 23 January 2014 is total $ 35000.00 as per conversion rate of one $ = 62 Rs. 2170000.00 (Rupees Twenty one Lakh Seventy thousand only)
  8.  The cost of supply order for 14 No. of Fume Hood 1200C as per SO dated 19 November 2013 in INR is Rs. 45,76,005.00(Rupees Forty five lakh seventy six thousand and five only).
  9. Therefore the difference in prices of Supply Order and Invoice is Rs. 24,06,005.00 (Rs. 4576005.00 – Rs. 2170000.00). The difference of amount of Rs. 24,06,005.00 was not justify, if you plus other expenses like transport/installation/profits etc not come more than 30 to 40%  the nexus between, DMSRDE officials and KAN-THT India, Delhi can clearly establish.
  10. The supply order was cancelled under exposure of deal & pressure of my complaint to CVC on subject matter. Cancellation of supply order itself shows that there was no need of Fume Hoods in DMSRDE and procurement was initiated just to get fatty commission by corrupt officials of DMSRDE. Therefore total amount of Rs. 4576005.00 of public money was going in wastage and major part of this, more than 50% was going in pocket of DMSRDE corrupt officer
  11. Mere cancelation of Supply Order cannot dilute their crime under section 13(1)(d) PC Act 1988 and their involvement in criminal misconduct. It is very clear that Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena, Director, DMSRDE was having intent for corruption of Rs. 26,14,815.00 and involved in criminal conspiracy and criminal misconduct along with Mr. Ajitendra Singh Parihar, Scientist ‘D’(The Indenter). Mr. Shielendra Kumar, Scientist ‘F’ (Head Estate & Work Division and MMG) and Mr. Ajay Chandel, Head of KAN-THT India, Delhi.
  12. Till date no action has been initiated by Sri Avinash Chander, DGR&D, DRDO against Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena, Director, DMSRDE despite he is fully aware of the real facts and truth of the case.

The crux of above case is how DRDO purchase manual manipulated in this case

  1. As per invoice of Biobase, China the billing address is DMSRDE and shipping address is also DMSRDE, it means Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena, Director, DMSRDE very well knows that if they ask CDC from CC R&D, DRDO who is suppose to issue CDC in the case of domestic suppliers will ask the copy of purchase order placed by domestic supplier to foreign supplier as well as the copy of invoice issued by foreign supplier to domestic suppliers and it is clear mandate that the more than 30% of the invoice cost are not allowed.
  2. If the billing and shipping is direct to DMSRDE or any establishment than Director is suppose to issue CDC.
  3. In this case as per Biobase, China invoice custom can made party for damrage charges to DMSRDE and DRDO lose its credentials.
  4. This the mechanism to fooling the CDA and Government of India after making so many rules and precautions DRDO officials busy in research to fix the poor tax payers money.

In light of aforesaid facts, I kindly request you to submit your true findings& recommendations in FFIC report and leave the DS promotion list to almighty GOD’s disposalas these corrupt top DRDO officials could not write your faith.

Although as per DOPT Guidelines for FFI, you should call me for personal hearing but you make that technical lapse, still I again like to inform you that there are several trump cards that has not been revealed till so far as your FFIC did not gave personal hearing to me.

Besides this I would also remind you very humbly that like your Bigboss Sri Avinash Chander, you will not submit false report to protect Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena, Director, DMSRDE, Kanpur as Sri Avinash Chander submitted false report to protect his friend Dr. Arun Kumar. That everybody knows the effort of Bigboss was failed and Dr. Arun Kumar was treated properly by Hon’ble Defence Minister Sri AK Antony.

Hope you will listen your heart’s voice “अब  कितने  दिन  बाकि  है  वैसे भी  लगता  है  मोदी  जी   ने    एक्सटेंशन  बंद करने  का  मन बना  लिया  19 अगस्त को  जैसा  की  उन्होंने  कहा  की  मुझे  5 लैब्स  ऐसी  चाहिए  कि   जिसमे  35  वर्ष  से ऊपर   कोई   नहीं  हो”  समझने  वालो  के  लिए  इशारा  ही  काफी  होता।

Regards 
 
Prabhu Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur
Dehradun-248008
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com, website www.corruptionindrdo.com

Enclosed

  1. Supply order details
  2. Specifications
  3. Copy of Invoice of Jinan Bio Base Biotech Co Ltd,  China

Copy to

  1. CVC,  CENTRAL VIGILANCE COMMISSION, Satarkata Bhavan , A-Block, GPO Complex , INA, New Delhi – 110 023
  2. CVO, MOD, Room No 340, Office of Director of Vigilance, B- Wing Sena Bhawan, Rajaji Marg, New Delhi -110105

Supply order detailsfume supply order

SpecificationsFumeHood specification

Copy of Invoice of Jinan Bio Base Biotech Co. Ltd,  ChinaFumeHood invoiceFumeHood stand invoice

Some more facts

DMSRDE raised demand under works headfume demand

Quotation received for same Fume hood Model FH 1200 from Jinan Bio Base Biotech Co. Ltd,  Chinafume quotation

Tender inquiry for Fume Hoodfume tender

Uncategorized

RTI Reply of CVO, MOD -Status of complaints against Dr. A K Saxena

Leave a comment

Massage to all DMSRDE OFFICIALS

Andhera Door Hoga,Suraj Niklega – Achhe Din Aayyenge-DMSRDE will be free of Corrupt Director 

Dear friends,

Fight against corruption nepotism favouritism and clean the DRDO is the main goal of www.corruptionindrdo.com website and this mission website exposed the DMSRDE’s corruption and corrupt practices of Director Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena. Several RTIs were filed to collect information & disclose the cases of corruption. An atmosphere against corruption was developed in DMSRDE and people came on front.

People of Kanpur along with DMSRDE’s officials witnessed the frustrations of Director Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena via print media where he tried to his best to destroy the reputation with his absurd words like the website involved in anti national activities and DRDO information is leaking to US and intelligence agencies after website and DRDO is not able to close the website because the hosting is from US blab la.

My friend Saxena lost his mind like Dr Arun Kumar did after the exposer, he filed FIR what happened everyone knows in DRDO, so my friends as Lord Krishana said it is matter of number 95,96,97,98 99 …. wait don’t lost the hope, culprit will get his due.

CVC, CVO, MOD all agencies are on the job files are moving, accountability is fixing, After first fact finding committee of Dr S S Negi got his due credits from 1st September onwards he will going to enjoy IRDE, Directorship, now 2nd Fact finding committee of Dr D C Pande, Sc ‘H’ also waiting of his due rewards. The facts are with Sh Avinash Chander, DG, DRDO, if he believes in GOD or Bhartmata then DMSRDE will know otherwise Sh Jaitely Ji and Modi Ji’s is there for further action.

CVC has informed that all complaints have been forwarded to CVO (MOD) for further necessary action. CVC reply is enclosed.

The RTI reply from CPIO, CVO, MOD are enclosed for ready reference.

Sri Avinash Chander not able to protect Dr.Arvind Kumar Saxena from CVC & CVO(MOD) like Dr. VK Saraswat could not save Dr.Arun Kumar (Suspended just before two hours of his superannuation, Dr. AK Tyagi, Sc ‘G’ who was busy to protecting corrupt official of DRDO as
CPIO,DRDO Hqrs charge sheeted for his corrupt practices, Sri SM Veerbhadrapa, Ex Director, DTRL charge sheeted just before retirement for his act of manipulation in appoint procedure of Mrs T Chandra banu, Mrs T Chandra banu, Scientist ‘F’ whose appointment cancelled by DRDO by mere 12 days before her superannuation. The two Ex- DG Dr. VK Saraswat and Sh M Natrajan along with Dr W Selvamurthy are under CBI lense.

I would like to remind of statement of Hon’ble Sri Atal Bihari Bajpayee, Ex- Prime Minister:”Andhera Chattega, Suraj nikalega” and Hon’ble Sri Narendra ModiJi, PM of India – “Achhe Din Aayyenge”.

RTI request to CPIO,CVO, MOD

To                                                      23rd July 2014
Sh. Samir Ranjan Amin
U/Secretary & CPIO
Room No 340, Office of Director of Vigilance
B- Wing Sena Bhawan
Rajaji Marg, New Delhi -110105

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005 in respect of complaints against Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena, Director, DMSRDE, Kanpur and as per CVC the complaints has been sent to CVO, MOD for further action, with reference No. 1323/2014/Vigilance 9, 3617/2014/Vigilance 9, 5022/2014/Vigilance 9, 13248/2014/Vigilance 9, etc.

1.Please provide the present status of all my complaints received by your office till date from CVC.
2.Please provide the copy of replies received from DRDO by CVO, MOD in respect of my complaints.
3.Please provide the copies of your forwarding letter to DRDO in respect of my all complaints.

Regards
Prabhu Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com website www.corruptionindrdo.com

CVO RTI Reply of DMSRDE case
CVO RTI Reply of DMSRDE Corruption cases

 

CVO RTI Reply DMSRDE Corruption Cases
CVO RTI Reply DMSRDE Corruption Cases

Cvo rti reply DMSRDE case2

Cvo rti reply DMSRDE case3 Cvo rti reply DMSRDE case4

 

Drdo

Invite white paper on DRDO’s current scenario

2 Comments
To                                                                                                             14th August 2014
Sh. Narendra Modi,
Prime Minister,
Room No – 152, PMO,
South Block, NEW DELHI -110011

Subject: Invite white paper on DRDO’s current scenario.

Honorable Sir,

I have to submit following points for rejuvenate DRDO and give moral boost to real honest scientific work force for fruitful and meaningful system/ arms development for end application in three services.

  1. DRDO since its inception was committed to assist the active services and the defence production agency in modernization of front line technologies.
  2. Until 1980 the organization followed its road map which was evolved by Dr Kothari the then front line technologies to PM. Since then we fought three successive war with our neighbors and requirements of three services increased   many fold as they had to secure our borders from external threats,
  3. The demand on DRDO increased therefore, 52 defence R&D labs scattered across the India were established in phased manner. Primary importance was given to the development of long/short range missiles, tank equaling to world class technology, light combat aircraft, nuclear powered submarine, kilo class of warships.
  4. With foregoing objectives government of India in 1980 when Smt Indira Gandhi returned to power declared DRDO an integral part of defence working under secretary, DR&D, DG, DRDO and Scientific Adviser to Raksha Mantri. (the three combined post to be hold by single person)
  5. Simultaneously the annual budget of DRDO from Rs 64 crores was raised to 1100 crores in particular for establishing modern infrastructures and accelerates indigenous technology development of arms and ammunitions.
  6.  The enhanced fund and absolute power to SA to RM without accountability derailed the road map laid by Dr. Kothari the then adviser to PM. Prior to this the post of SA to RM was honorary post
  7.  Grabbing land in the name of defence and construction of buildings disproportionate to manpower was the prime work of DRDO top bosses after mid 1980’s. Since the omission commission is hefty every DRDO top officials focused upon the infrastructure development without justified the requirements or create fake requirement in the name of ongoing projects and this being continue till date. Annual maintainace and repairs of these unused infrastructures gulps the major chunk of DRDO annual budget.
  8. Presently in DRDO 99% officials are engaged with procurement cases and look for its completion on 31st march every year, however, they have forgotten the development of frontline technologies and some of the projects/ programs under taken in early 70’s which were suppose to completed by not later than 5 years from the date of sanction is still incomplete after 40 years the notable example are Arjun tank, GTX engine, Tejas, Nag, Akash, Trishul missiles etc.
  9. Due to weak government at the center nobody question the authenticity of prolong time taken for development of arms/ ammunitions etc.
  10. While successive SA to RM were able to justify the failures  and where the centre rewarded those with Padama Awards, such erroneous decisions encouraged the incompetency in DRDO and at one time before the Kargil War SA to RM authenticated the conceptual proving of the arms than the development of prototype. The justification was that “ we are 100 crores people nobody can attack on us”
  11. Immediately India witnessed the Kargil conflict in 1999 where the General Malik said “casualties in the conflict could have been reduced had the Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO) not come in the way”
  12. With this poor show of DRDO during Kagil war the then PM expressed unhappiness with then SA to RM and said “ अपना घर संभालिये सब कुछ ठीक नहीं चल रहा है”
  13. Today the condition is that the DRDO procurement policy 2006 duly approved by finance ministry is violated by top DRDO officials (SA to RM, Directors, Program Directors etc.) by splitting the orders to make them within their sanction power. Compromising the quality, favors to vendor by customizing specifications, managed foreign visits with help of suppliers all this result at the end short closing of the project without deliverable output.
  14. Now annually DRDO consuming not less than Rs 10000 crores but ultimate looser is country with poor tax payers. “DRDO has become social commitment” Former PM Sh VP Singh said in 2nd DRDO Director’s conference at Bangalore.

Honorable Sir,

A white paper may please be sought from DRDO and it should be made public so that 49% FDI in defence sector could be justified.

Following points to be justified

  1. Total asset of DRDO
  2. Annual Budget
  3. Lab wise manpower vis -a -vis Project/Programs (it will give the clear picture of delays in output)
  4. Products developed and its production and deployments in services for each lab (it will prove the worthiness of Lab)
  5.  Awards – vis a vis output of awardees
  6. Incentives given on product development ( this will expose the real talent)
  7. Patents – Granted/ applied
  8. Man power planned and its proportionate buildup accommodation lab wise
  9. Total cost of abandon equipments lab wise
  10. Statistical failure data analyzing and corrective measure for deployed project like LCA/Arjun Tank/Arihant/various Missiles.

Sir, this is a honest approach to clean DRDO from corruption as you said in Kargil  “Corruption is the worst plague that has ruined the country. Once it is rooted out, we will sail on the path of development smoothly,”

 
Regards
  
Prabhu Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur
Dehradun-248008
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com, website www.corruptionindrdo.com
Drdo

RTI-MHA – Padama Awards

3 Comments
To                                                                              9th  August 2014
Smt. Shyamala Mohan, CPIO,
Director (A&V), MHA.
North Block,
New Delhi-11000

 

Hello,

Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005 in respect of Dr. Vijay Kumar Saraswat, Ex- DG, DRDO, Dr. A. Sivathanu Pillai, Ex-CC R&D, DRDO and  Sh, Avinash Chander, DG DRDO. Dr. Vijay Kumar Saraswat, Ex- DG, DRDO and Dr. A. Sivathanu Pillai, Ex-CC R&D, DRDO both have been awarded the Padma Bhushan and Sh, Avinash Chander, DG DRDO awarded Padam Shri in 2013.

  1. Provide the copy recommendations of all above three individuals.
  2. Provide the copy of citations enclosed with proposal by Ministry of Defence for above three individuals.
  3.   Provide the names of recommending persons to all above three individuals.

 

Regards
Prabhu  Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun
Ph   0135 2787750, Mobile 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website   www.corruptionindrdo.com

 Registration Number               – MHOME/R/2014/61828

Drdo

RTI- Cabinet Secretariat – Shri Avinash Chander’s Contractual Appointment

Leave a comment
To                                                        1st August 2014
Shri Rajesh Nagpal,
Under Secretary & CPIO,
Cabinet Secretariat,
Rashtrapati Bhawan,
New Delhi-110 004

Hello,

Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005 in respect of Para (2) of appointment letter No. I2/9/2013-EO (SM.I) dated 31st May 2013 regarding appointment of Shri Avinash Chander, Distinguished Scientist & Chief Controller Research & Development (Missiles &Strategic Systems), DRDO as Secretary, Department of Defence Research & Development-cum-Director General, Defence Research and Development Organisation and Scientific Adviser to Raksha Mantri for a period of three years. “The appointment of Shri Avinash Chander beyond his date of retirement i.e. 30.1 1.2014, would be on contract basis with the same terms and conditions as he would be entitled to Secretary (DRD) before the date of retirement”.(Copy Annexed)

  1. Provide copy of Contract Agreement between Government of India and Shri Avinash Chander for the reemployment on contract basis during the period 01 Dec 2014 to 31 May 2016.
  2. Provide provisions and rules of Government of India under which Shri Avinash Chander was appointed on contract basis as Secretary, Department of Defence Research & Development-cum-Director General, Defence Research and Development Organisation and Scientific Adviser to Raksha Mantri after his normal retirement and completion of two extensions upto the age of 64 Years.
  3. Whether an official appointed on contract after retirement can function as Head of Office for all administrative & financial matters in the department.(Yes/No)
  4. File noting for appointment of Shri Avinash Chander as Secretary, Department of Defence Research & Development-cum-Director General, Defence Research and Development Organisation and Scientific Adviser to Raksha Mantri.
  5. Whether appointment after age of 64 years violates provisions of FR 56(d). (Yes/No)
Regards
Prabhu  Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun
Ph   0135 2787750, Mobile 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website   www.corruptionindrdo.com

Registration Number     CABST/R/2014/60302sa-appointment-letter6 CPC HAG Recomguideline of contract appointmentguideline of contract appointment page2guideline of contract appointment page3guideline of contract appointment page4contract appointment agreement page1contract appointment agreement page2contract appointment agreement page3contract appointment agreement page4

Drdo

RTI- Dr. V. Bhujanga Rao double extension – international stature ???? Patent ????

Leave a comment
To                                                                                  30th July 2014
Sh B.Bandopadhyay,
CPIO & Under secretary, (Estt.A-IV),
R.No.202, North Block, 
Department of Personnel & Training, (DOPT),
New Delhi-110001

Hello,

Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005 in respect of Dr. V. Bhujanga Rao, Distinguished Scientist is holding the post of DG, (NS&M) in DRDO. He got extension two times in the service beyond the age of superannuation under the 2nd and 3rd proviso of FR 56(d) and various OMs issued by DOPT, MOP PG&P. Details of the extensions granted to him by ACC are given below.

Dr. V. Bhujanga Rao,              -DOB: 10 Oct 1951

Extension-I for 60 -62 years 0 -1 Nov 2011 to 31 Oct 2013

Extension-II for 62-64 years – 01 Nov 2013 to 31 Oct 2015

The procedure for grant of extension to the Scientists is laid down in DoPT DO letter No. 28/19/2000-EO(SM-II) dated the 10th July, 2000, OM No. No. 26012/6/2002-Estt. (A) dated 9th December 2002, OMNo. 26012/8/2011-Estt. (A) dated 16 May 2011, OM No. 26012/12/2013-Estt.(A) dated 13 June, 2013 and OM No. 26012/7/2013-Estt.(A.IV) dated 26 Jun 2013.

The DPRCs must give detailed justification for such extension based on merits of the case, the international stature of the person recommended and also indicates whether this will block promotion opportunities of others in the Department. (Para3 of OM No. 26012/8/2011-Estt. (A) dated 16 May 2011)

  1. File Noting of Departmental Peer Review Committee (DPRC) constituted by DOPT vide OM No. 20012/15/2010-Estt(A-IV) dated 4th May 2011 for recommending extension in service after superannuation from 60-62 years.
  2. File Noting of Appointment Committee of Cabinet (ACC) for granting the extension in service after superannuation from 60-62 years.
  3. File Noting of Departmental Peer Review Committee (DPRC) constituted by DOPT vide OM No. 26012/7/2013-Estt.(A.IV) dated 26 June 2013 for recommendation of the extension in service after superannuation from 62-64 years to Screening Committee.
  4. File Noting of Screening Committee headed by the CabinetSecretary constituted by DOPT vide OM No. 26012/12/2013-Estt.(A) dated 13 June 2013for recommendation of the extension in service after superannuation from 62-64 years to ACC.
  5. File Noting of Appointment Committee of Cabinet (ACC) for granting the extension in service after superannuation from 62-64 years.
  6. Criteria for deciding International Stature of a Scientist for consideration to grant extension from 62-64 years as required vide Para 3 of OM No. 26012/8/2011-Estt. (A) dated 16 May 2011.
  7. Whether Dr. V. Bhujanga Rao, Distinguished Scientist, DRDO, Ministry of Defence is having International Stature as required for extension from 62-64 years.(Yes/No)
  8. If answer to point (7) is yes then provide the copy of justification given by DPRC or Screening Committee to ACC.
Regards
Prabhu  Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun
Ph   0135 2787750, Mobile 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website   www.corruptionindrdo.com

Registration Number       DOP&T/R/2014/62699

Drdo

RTI – Farzi extension because DRDO scientists not having international stature which is the essential criteria for service extension as per GOI

Leave a comment
To                                                                                  30th July 2014
Sh B.Bandopadhyay
CPIO & Under secretary, (Estt.A-IV),
R.No.202, North Block , 
Department of Personnel & Training, (DOPT),
New Delhi-110001

Hello,

Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005 in respect of FR 56 (d). Fundamental Rules (FR) are statutory rules framed in exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution, by the President.

There is provision to grant extension in the service beyond the age of superannuation under the 2nd and 3rd provision of FR 56(d).

DOPT vide OM No. No. 26012/6/2002-Estt. (A) Dated 9th December 2002, fixed the Proforma for sending proposals for approval of Department of Personnel & Training for grant of extension to Government servants beyond the age of superannuation.

It has been observed that DRDO is not adherence to this Proforma for sending the proposals to DOPT and using a different Proforma having 10 points only while Proforma set by DOPT is having 13 points. (Copy of both DOPT & DRDO Proforma are enclosed for ready reference).

DOPT is also accepting the proposals of DRDO in another Performa framed by DRDO itself which left very vital information in its Proforma.

Kindly provide the following information under RTI Act 2005.

  1. Sri P. S. Subramanyam, Director of Aeronautical Development Agency (born 28.06.1950) was on extension up to 64 years till 30 June 2014. Government of India has given one more year extension to him beyond the age of 64. Provide copy of File Noting of Screening Committee headed by the Cabinet Secretary and File Noting of Appointment Committee of Cabinet (ACC) for granting the extension in service after superannuation age of 64 years to him.
  2. Copy of service extension rules / provisions of which service may be granted by Government of India to a Scientist working under Central Government beyond the age of 64 years.
  3. DRDO sending proposals for approval of Department of Personnel & Training for grant of extension to Government servants beyond the age of superannuation with their own performa other then FR 56 (d) provide the copy of approval of competent authority for DRDO performa.
  4. As per provision to Article 309 of the Constitutionno organization having no power to amend Statutory Fundamental Rules. Provide the grounds on basis of which DOPT is accepting the proposals in modified Proforma of DRDO.
  5. Number of posts of Distinguished Scientist fixed by the Government in DRDO.
Regards
Prabhu  Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008
Phone – 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website – www.corruptionindrdo.com

Enclosed : FR 56 (d) Performa of DOPT and DRDO Performa

  Registration Number          DOP&T/R/2014/62698

FR 56 (d) Performa of DOPT and DRDO Performa
FR 56 (d) Performa of DOPT and DRDO Performa