Tag Archives: requested

Drdo

RTI- Dr Tessy Thomas’s Visit to Vijay Raje Scindia Kanya P G College, Gwalior

7 Comments
To                                                                                                                    24th March 2014
Dr. RB Sharma, CPIO,
DRDO HQ, Min. of Defence,
DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg,
New Delhi-110011                             

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect  the visit of Dr Tessy Thomas, Scientist -H, DRDL, DRDO, Hyderabad to Vijay Raje Scindia Kanya P G College, Gwalior on 21st March 2014. News paper clip enclosed.

  1. Whether the visit of Dr Tessy Thomas as chief gust in Golden Jubilee of Vijay Raje Scindia Kanya P G College, Gwalior was official or private.
  2. Did Dr Tessy Thomas permission was obtained from competent authority Yes/No
  3. If yes then the copy of permission letter.
  4. Escort provided by MP Police department to Dr Tessy Thomas was official requested by DRDO Hqrs/  Director, DRDE Yes/No
  5. If Yes then copy of request letter.
  6. Please provide the total amount of expenditure incurred  by DRDE Gwalior for the  visit of Dr Tessy Thomas to golden jubilee of Vijay Raje Scindia Kanya P G College, Gwalior, where wife of Dr M P Kaushik’s wife working as HOD, Chemistry Department.
  7. If any funds/grants given to Vijay Raje Scindia Kanya P G College, Gwalior by DRDE, DRDO under any projects/ programs from April 2010 to March 2013. Then total amount and project/program names.
  8. The total cost of gifts/presentation if any received by Dr Tessy Thomas from Vijay Raje Scindia Kanya P G College, Gwalior.

Note : Matter is directly related to corruption and not exempted under Section 24 (1)  

Regards
Prabhu  Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur,  Dehradun
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879, e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website www.corruptionindrdo.com

 Registration Number: MODEF/R/2014/60584

tesy

Drdo

Complaint to CVC – DMSRDE FUME HOOD PROCUREMENT CASE

12 Comments
To                                                                                                          
Central Vigilance Commissioner,
Central Vigilance Commission,
Satarkta Bhawan, A- Block, GPO Complex, INA
New Delhi-110023
 

SUBJECT: Corruption in procurement of Fume Hoods in DMSRDE Kanpur Officers involved in Procurement

  1. Sh. A.S. Parihar, Scientist ‘D’ – Indenter
  2. Sh. Shielendra Kumar, Scientist ‘E’ Head Estate & Work Division and also MMG division both.
  3. Dr. AK Saxena, Director & CFA
  1. Defence Materials & Stores Research & Development Establishment (DMSRDE), Kanpur is an establishment under Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO), Min. of Defence, DRDO Bhawan, New Delhi.
  2. DRDO’s Director Material Management distributed to all Labs & Establishments a manual named “DRDO Purchase Management -2006” which was duly approved by President of India and with the concurrence of Ministry of Defence (Fin/R&D) vide their ID No 752/IF (R&D) dated 20 March 2006.
  3. “DRDO Purchase Management -2006”  page no 12,  para 4.5.2 stated     Directors of Labs/Estts will observe adequate caution while working out detailed specifications of an intended procurement that these are not tailor made to suit a particular brand of product. Broad coverage of the functional performance and environmental parameters will be spelled out in the specifications to allow competition. For this purpose a computer-based data bank of similar products, along with broad specifications will be maintained and updated frequently so as to facilitate fair competition in purchases.
  4. The following case of procurement of Fume Hoods is totally violated procurement rules laid down by DRDO.
    • Tailor made specification was made and brand name as well as model number mentioned in tender inquiry.
    • Make cannot be mentioned in demand only item can be purchased whichever is having lowest prise. So he can purchase a branded item of particular firm unless it is propitiatory item. Bio base is Chinese Company so how they decided to purchase that brand when several manufactures and brands of Fume Hood were available in the Market
    • Item was purchased by Estate & Works Division, This division cannot indent & purchase Fume hood as this division is only for maintenance of Buildings & Govt accommodation.
    • Purchased qty 14 because the total price comes under fifty lakh which was within the limit of Director’s purchase power. Purchase Rules was violated as case was so designed that cost remain below 50 Lakhs (the Financial Power of Director)
    • Purchased exorbitant price because the same item is available in open market @ 1350 $ and dollar rate of date of supply order (19 November 2013) was Rs 62.26.
    • Open Market cost of  Fume Hood Chamber (Make- Biobase, Shandong Model- FH-1200 C) $1350 X 62.26 ( Dollar Rate on 19 Nov 2013 ) = Rs 84051.00
    • Fume Hood Chamber (Make- Biobase, Shandong Model- FH-1200 C) was purchased @ 290540.00 and Quantity 14 was purchased total amount Rs. 45,76,005.00. (With Tax)
    •  Actual cost of 14 no of Fume Hood Chamber (Make- Biobase, Shandong Model- FH-1200 C) Rs 84051.00 X 14 = Rs. 1176714.00
    •  Purchased exorbitant price by DMSRDE – Rs 290540.00 x 14 = Rs 4067560.00
    •  Total loss of poor tax payers Rs 4067560.00 – Rs. 1176714 = Rs 2890846.00 

FUME HOOD PROCUREMENT CASE

DMSRDE Fume Hood Demands Detailsfume demand   Demand Under worksfume demand under works DMSRDE, Kanpur Tender Details fume tender  DMSRDE, Kanpur placed Supply Order to KAN-THT (INDIA) Pvt. Ltd., Delhi to procure the item  details of which given below.fume supply order 5.   The facts stated above, it is amply crystal clear that prima facie material regarding Abuse of Authority by arrogant and corrupt administrator Dr. A. K. Saxena, Director DMSRDE exists.

6.    In view of the above mentioned facts and evidences it is earnestly requested that an order for through investigation of all procurement done by Dr. Arvind Kumar  Saxena after assuming charge as Director, DMSRDE, DRDO, Kanpur to stop further corruption and wastage of poor tax payers money.

Prabhu Dandriyal                                                                   22 January 2014
21-Sunderwal, Raipur, Dehradun -248008                                                                              
0135-2787750 – 91-9411114879
Email-prabhudoon@gmail.com,  www.corruptionindrdo.com
 

 

Annexure  – 1. Quotation  of  Fume Hood Chamber (Make- Biobase, Shandong Model- FH-1200 C)fume quotation
 
Drdo

Height of Nepotism

1 Comment

Today 10th January 2014 at 1200 Hrs Sh R C Agarwal, Director, DEAL rushed to IRDE to have meeting with Chairman ASCODAR to influence him and his team members.

He requested to Chairman, ASCODAR to sealed Sh R K Agarwal, Scientist’H’ as Sh R K Agarwal is his blue eyed boy.

The committee was influenced to use a word “Normalization” of APAR Marks.

The aim was to create an impression that the hatred shown by Sh R K Agarwal towards Schedule Cast community is shadowed by the word “Normalization”.

However, the intention of Sh R K Agarwal and Sh R C Agarwal and their hatred towards Schedule Cast community is not over sighted.

They have to assured and submit their apology to Sh Jagdish Kumar, T O ‘C’ and his spouse because last eight months they gone through mental agony. The way Sh R K Agarwal downgraded APAR marks without mentioning a single reason.  Sh Jagdish Kumar, T O ‘C’ got clear signal that in early years during 2005 to 2007 when Sh R K Agarwal his recommended authority deprived him from promotion.

It is very common in DRDO because of absolute power of DRDO Directors and his trusted men (Chamchas) ignore all laid down rules of government of India.

However, honorable supreme court taken very serious view on the irresponsible senior officials who have tried to play with the provision of Indian Constitution.

It is requested to Honorable Raksha Mantri to look into the matter and give necessary directive to SA to RM.

Regards

Prabhu Dandriyal
21- Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008
Prabhudoon@gmail.com
www.corruptionindrdo.com
09411114879, 0135-2787750

Date  10th January 2014

Drdo

Anarchy in DRDO Labs

Leave a comment

The corrupt practices of DRDO Directors have made them blind to the extents that do not respect the chain of command. Do not respect their seniors who helped them to shoulder the responsibility.

Unnecessary infighting within labs has caused lack of motivation towards self reliance.

Directors, to satisfy their ego, searches some know buried facts against an individual’s officials who were the trusted men (Chamchas) of his predecessor.

Honorable Defence Minister is requested to make specific mention in his forth coming address to DRDO Directors Conclave “Directors of 52 Labs should concentrate their energy to delvers at least 52 Import Substitutes only” rather than indulge sundry ego problems, which resulted in form of increasing legal litigations.

Director, DRDE, Gwalior Sh M P Kaushik being put the lab knew that his predecessor in year 2010 permitted the inclusion of BE degree in service book record of Sh B P Shakya, STA’B’.

Since the Sh B P Shakya, STA’B belongs to Schedule Cast category and trusted man of  Sh M P Kaushik’s predecessor overlooked the DO Part order 22 dated 10th March 2010 and served  charge sheet to Sh B P Shakya, STA’B.

It is requested to S A to RM Sh Avinash Chandra as competent authority please quashed the charge sheet dated 16th October 2013 issued by Sh M P Kaushik and give directive to Sh M P Kaushik to concentrate his energy in DRDE & DRDE development work instead of wasting the precious time and energy in his cheap ego satisfaction.

Sir there is more 100 of similar cases known to me where individuals concealed their higher qualification while time of their joining. In DRDE you will find five cases in similar nature.  Have DRDO ready to open all cases?

It is again requested please give directions to your all directors to stop harassing the Schedule Cast and weaker section of society.

In above it is also observed that the CAO, DRDE also not gave his co-operation and guidance to individual to get natural justice. As a senior administrative official and moral ground he should advice to Sh M P Kaushik not to take such vindictive approach.

Similar case of harassment of Schedule Cast category has been observed in DEAL, DRDO, Dehradun. Where sh R C Agarwal, Director, DEAL, instead of delivering the product casting 100 Cr (SDR) for which DRDO has extended his service twice (unprecedentedly ) has diverted his attention to torture Schedule Cast individual Sh Jagdish Kumar T O ‘C’, who has been thrice to Antarctica and best communication man of DEAl.

Sh R C Agarwal failed in every field of his technical contribution, feels that helping his own community by out of way, in promotion, protecting them in their action of harassing Schedule Cast and weaker section.

Sh R C Agarwal in his second extension in service as Director, DEAL, he was busy with

Increased hatred against Schedule Cast and weaker section.

Out of way helping own community

Increased works (civil construction and infrastructure) activity in many folds

Sh R C Agarwal support Sh R K Agarwal for his false claim of his involvement in Project ‘NARAD’ and got success to supersede more than 50 odd DRDO senior scientist

Sh R C Agarwal accepted and recommended Sh R K Agarwal’s false claim ““his main contribution has been the development of NARAD, the first semi-static and transportable terminals developed in the country. These terminals were immediately deployed in SRI LANKA during operation PAWAN where they have played a vital Role.”

By this Sh R C Agarwal has abused his power and authority and has mislead with false information to honorable Raksha Mantri and selecting committee empower to select Sceitist ‘H’ equivalent to Lt general.

Sh R K Agarwal created hatred with SC community and Sh R C Agarwal seconded his misadventure. A committee constituted by DG, Sh SS Sundaram to look in to  the matter,   but unfortunately committee again plan to humiliate Sh Jagdish Kumar T O ‘C’, by sending a Fax dated 6th January 2014 vide No.78700/TIS to ask him to prepare a power point presentation on work claimed in APAR against the norms of ASCODAR.

Honorable Raksha Mantri is requested to set up a inquiry so that Schedule Cast and weaker section of DRDO should not suffer.

Drdo

Complaint against Dr A K Saxena, Director, DMSRDE, DRDO, Kanpur -II

Leave a comment
To                                                                                                                    26th December 2013
Central Vigilance Commissioner
Central Vigilance Commission
Satarkta Bhawan, A- Block, GPO Complex, INA
New Delhi-110023
 
To,                                                                                                                 
Joint Secretary (Estt.) and Public Grievances & CVO,
Ministry of Defence, Government of India, 97, South Block,
New Delhi -110 105
 
To
Sh Avinash Chander
SA to RM,DG,DRDO
Room No 541, DRDO Bhawan
Rajaji Marg, New Delhi – 110105
 
To                                                                                                                              
The Defence Minister
Room No -104, South Block
New Delhi – 110011

SUBJECT : Complaint against Dr A K Saxena, Director, DMSRDE, DRDO, Kanpur

DRDO has an approved policy for guiding various procurements (Purchase Management –2006 document issued vide Govt. letter No DMM/PP/0000205/M/868/D(R&D) dated 22nd March 2006 amended vide letter No DMM/PP/0000206/M/2386/D(R&D) dated 21st Aug 2006

CORRIGENDUM No: 2 DMM/II/PP/0000207/M/3041/D(R&D) dated 15th Oct 2007

CORRIGENDUM No: 3 DMM/II/PP/0000208/M/3201/D(R&D) dated 16th Sept 2008

CORRIGENDUM No: 4 DMM/II/PP/0000210/P1/92/D(R&D) dated 14th Jan 2011

DRDO Directors never read above procurement documents because each and every case where Director’s pet agent involved means the above purchase rules have no meanings.

  1. Shri Rakesh Kumar Gupta, Scientist ‘C’ Applied Chemistry Division raised a demand No. DMSRDE/13552009 for “Laboratory Microprocessor Based Programmable High Temp.Furnace” on 30th August 2012.
  2. SPC date 13th September 2012
  3. DRDO Hqrs approval 1st October 2012
  4. Tender Date 1st October 2012 (see the efficiency)
  5. TEC on 6th December 2012
  6. TPC on 16th Jan 2013
  7. Supply order place to M/s Omega Furnace Industries Bangalore, “Omega Atmosphere Controlled Muffle Furance ” vide SO No  DMSRDE/13AT0240/552/12-13/CMS-II dated 26 Feb 2011
  8. Supply Order of Rs 16,81,500.00
  9. Stores Received on 27th September 2013 vide RIN No 14LP0149
  10. Now on the Director’s pet agent M/s Manglam Traders come in front and a review TPC was done,  under Chairmanship of  Dr. Sarfaraz Alam, Sc’G’               para two of review TPC                                                                                                     “Now, the firm M/s  Omega Furnace Industries, Bangalore has intimated that billing and supply of stores will be done by their local dealer M/s Manglam Traders, Kanpur, vide letter of even no dated September 24, 2013”                                           Para three of review TPC                                                                                                  “The finance rep told that the stores have been supplied by M/s Manglam Traders, Kanpur. Hence, the payment may be made to M/s Manglam Traders, Kanpur”      Para four of review TPC                                                                                                       “ In view of aforesaid TPC recommends the following
    For-Supply the stores & payment may be made to M/s  Omega Furnace Industries, Bangalore Read-Supply the stores & payment may be made to M/s Manglam Traders, Kanpur
  11. In view of above details, it is clear Violation of Purchase Management 2006 Rule 7.15(a) Constitution of TPC/NC,  it is requested that registered the complaint against Dr A K Saxena, Director, DMSRDE and his blind followers who are mishandling the government funds for their own vested interest. A thorough investigation is needed to explore the relation between Dr A K Saxena, Director, DMSRDE and M/s Manglam Traders, Kanpur. It may be reveal crores of crores rupees scam in DMSRDE and RCI, DRDO.
 
Prabhu Dandriyal                                                                                                                            
21-Sunderwal, Raipur, Dehradun -248008                                                                              
0135-2787750 – 91-9411114879                                                                 
prabhudoon@gmail.com,  www.corruptionindrdo.com
Drdo

RTI – DIAT, DRDO Dr A K Tyagi Case

1 Comment
To                                                                                                        Date 30th August 2013
The CPIO, DRDO HQ
Room No. 314A
DRDO Bhawan, RajajiMarg
New Delhi – 110105

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of Board Proceeding held on 11th March 2008 in DIAT for the purpose of scrutinize existing procedures for procurement of Books for library and check anomalies.

  1. Certified copy of R O No 41 of 10/2008 dated 15th February 2008.
  2. Certified copy of comments made by Vice Chancellor, DIAT on the findings submitted by Board of Officers. (Copy of findings enclosed)

Note: – above required information is directly related to corruption and not come under schedule – II. Because the recovery from DRDO officials proved that the some senior DRDO officials were indulged in corrupt practices.

Find the application fee for the request attached with this application. If you feel that above requested information does not pertain to your department then please follow the provisions of Section 6(3) of the RTI act 2005. Also as per the provision of the RTI Act 2005 please provide the details (Name and Designation) of the first appellate authority w.r.t. to your department with the reply to above request, where I may require file first appeal.

I do hereby declare that I am the citizen of India. Kindly provide me with the information at the address mentioned with the application. I request you to ensure that the information is provided before expiry of 30 day period after you have received the application.

IPO- 16 F 966243 enclosed

Regards

PrabhuDayalDandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur
Dehradun-248008
Phone – 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website – www.corruptionindrdo.com

 

Enclosed

  1. Copy of Board Proceeding Agenda
  2. Copy of Board Proceeding findings
  3. Copy of Book Purchase case as a sample
    1.Copy of Board Proceeding Agenda
    1. Copy of Board Proceeding Agenda

     

    2.Copy of Board Proceeding findings
    2. Copy of Board Proceeding findings
    2.Copy of Board Proceeding findings
    2. Copy of Board Proceeding findings
    2.Copy of Board Proceeding findings
    2. Copy of Board Proceeding findings
    3.Copy of Book Purchase case as a sample
    3. Copy of Book Purchase case as a sample

    rkt purchase2 rkt purchase3 rkt purchase4 rkt purchase5

     

     

     

Drdo

RTI-RAC-SASE

3 Comments
To                                                                            13th August 2013
The CPIO
 Recruitment & Assessment Centre
Lucknow Road, Timarpur
Delhi- 110054 

Hello,

Kindly provide me with the following information requested under purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005.   In respect of Sh Snehmani, Scientist ‘E’ , SASE, DRDO.

  1. Sh Snehmani joined DRDO in 1998 direct Scientist ‘C’ please provide the highest education degree and professional experience details submitted by him as per his application.
  2. Copy of Sh Snehmani’s application /intimation in which he stated that he is doing P hD from IIT Roorkee.
  3. At the time of promotion of Sc ‘C’ to Sc’D’ copy of  Sh Snehmani’s  Education Qualifications submitted by Director, SASE.
  4. At the time of promotion of Sc ‘D’ to Sc’E’’ copy of  Sh Snehmani’s  Education Qualifications submitted by Director, SASE.
  5. Copy of application and copy of permission of  Sh Snehmani’s  for doing PhD from Budelkand University.
  6. If Sh Snehmani submitted his PhD then please provide date of submission.

Note: – above required information is directly related to corruption and not come under schedule – II

Find the application fee for the request attached with this application. If you feel that above requested information does not pertain to your department then please follow the provisions of Section 6(3) of the RTI act 2005. Also as per the provision of the RTI Act 2005 please provide the details (Name and Designation) of the first appellate authority w.r.t. to your department with the reply to above request, where I may require file first appeal.

I do hereby declare that I am the citizen of India. Kindly provide me with the information at the address mentioned with the application. I request you to ensure that the information is provided before expiry of 30 day period after you have received the application.

Enclosed – Rs 10 Postal Order No 16F 966250

Regards

Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur
Dehradun-248008
Phone – 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhu@gmail.com  website – www.corruptionindrdo.com
Drdo

RTI- DIAT

1 Comment
To                                                                                                               Date 10th August 2013
The CPIO                                                                                    No RTI/DIAT/AKT/10/8/2013
Defence Institute of Armment Technology (DIAT) 
Simhagad Road, Girinagar
Pune-411 025

Hello,

Kindly provide me with the following information requested under purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005.   In respect of enquiry held under chairmanship of Sh Vijay Deshmukh  to investigate financial irregularities done by Dr A K Tyagi then OI/C,IC&L, Finance Officer of DIAT Library.

  1. The certified copy of final report of above mentioned enquiry committee.
  2. Any action taken by Vice Chancellor, DIAT- yes/no
  3. Copy of comments by then Prof. L M Patnaik,Vice Chancellor, DIAT, Pune on final report submitted by Sh Vijay Deshmukh, Chairman, Enquiry Committee.

Note: – above required information is directly related to corruption and not come under schedule – II

Find the application fee for the request attached with this application. If you feel that above requested information does not pertain to your department then please follow the provisions of Section 6(3) of the RTI act 2005. Also as per the provision of the RTI Act 2005 please provide the details (Name and Designation) of the first appellate authority w.r.t. to your department with the reply to above request, where I may require file first appeal.

I do hereby declare that I am the citizen of India. Kindly provide me with the information at the address mentioned with the application. I request you to ensure that the information is provided before expiry of 30 day period after you have received the application.

Enclosed – Rs 10 Postal Order No 16F 964392

Regards

Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur
Dehradun-248008
Phone – 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhu@gmail.com  website – www.corruptionindrdo.com
Drdo

DRL-TEZPUR- RTI-I

Leave a comment
To                                                                                                                        30th July 2013
The CPIO
Defence Research Laboratory (DRL)
Post Bag No.2, 
Tezpur (Assam) – 784 001

Hello,

Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005.

In reference to Golden jubilee celebrated by Defence Research Laboratory (DRL), Tezpur in 2012.

  1. How much amount was sanctioned by DRDO Hqrs, is it Rs 2.75 Lakhs or more? if more, than total sanctioned amount.
  2. Was any Golden jubilee function was organized by DRL, if yes then date of function and name of the chief guest of the function.
  3. Was any Golden jubilee memento or gift was distributed to the all DRL employees? if yes, then please provide quantity in numbers.
  4. Director, DRL, Tezpur opened an account in the name of TEZCON-12 in IDBI, Tezpur Branch A/C no 1158104000003261. Please provide the total amount collected by various vendors, the list of vendors, the last date of money deposited by vendor.
  5. The above account is still in operative yes/ No; if yes then please provide account statement till date. Remember it is public fund and any citizen of India has right to know about it.

In reference of Estate Management Unit, DRL, Tezpur

  1. All quarters of P-3 Block allotted to DRL employees Yes/No
  2. Any quarter of P-3 Block is allotted to any individual who is not a Government servant. Yes/No
  3. All service personals of working in DRDL availing the accommodations, Yes/No
  4. All service personals who are availing the accommodations are also claiming HRA, Yes/No

Note: – above required information is directly related to corruption and not come under schedule – II

Find the application fee for the request attached with this application. If you feel that above requested information does not pertain to your department then please follow the provisions of Section 6(3) of the RTI act 2005. Also as per the provision of the RTI Act 2005 please provide the details (Name and Designation) of the first appellate authority w.r.t. to your department with the reply to above request, where I may require file first appeal.

I do hereby declare that I am the citizen of India. Kindly provide me with the information at the address mentioned with the application. I request you to ensure that the information is provided before expiry of 30 day period after you have received the application.

Enclosed – Rs 10 Postal Order No  16F 964386

Regards
Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur,Dehradun-248008
Phone – 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website – www.corruptionindrdo.com