Congratulations to you for biggest event of DRDO that is “Demonstration of Technology” to fight Cyber Area.
As my website was not engaged in any anti- national activities, I was simply fighting against corruption prevailing in DRDO. Hacking of website for technology demonstration by DRDO corrupt official with the help of their friends & relatives who are scared by exposes is not a worth Idea. Even then as a bonafide and disciplined ex- soldier of DRDO, I appreciate the team effort in the area where IT information are to be preserve for national Interest.
For your benefit I will mention here that DRDO with 30000 strong technical work force and more than 1 lakh crores infrastructure always talked about big things like bringing moon on earth, but due to lack of accountability at top level the commitment were fizzled out and as result all our mission mode projects were remain on paper and simply act as Technology Demonstrations. In some cases we demonstrated the technology by importing the import substitute, but it did not convinced the users.
1999 Kargil War, the DRDO contribution was NIL to address the services requirements. As
The Bulletproof jacket which killed Sh Hemant Karkare in 26/11 Mumbai attack was tested by DRDO scientist.( had there been an accountability, the officer might have acted in national interest and would have rejected the jacke, approved by taking bribe)
All though DRDO consume nearly 10% of defence budget annually but your officers and administrative machinery behave as if they are independent and autonomous body and not answerable to anyone.
The public mood however, does not accept the rules and provisions of CCS. Public demands accountability and prepare yourself to explain to the nation, how DRDO has consuming a huge amount without delivering the single pin.
Annually distributions of awards to those who do not deserve, you spend the money because it has to be spent. Under CARS program you sanctioned projects to those universities where you have friends as lectures/ owners hardly you bother to co-ordinate educational institute – R&D-Industries participation for the total development of the economy, the backbone of the country.
Friends are called as experts, friends are called as peer review committee members, friends are called for harass to sincere scientists who are not ready for compromise for vested interest and encourage those who just wag their tails.
In 50 years period, today is the day of biggest achievement of DRDO brasses, since the website www.corruptionindrdo.com was hacked. If this hacking was possible with external help like Singapore, USA then sorry to say you does not deserve my congratulations.
To 22th August 2011The Honorable Prime MinisterPMO, South BlockNew Delhi -110011
Subject: Grant of Extension of service of Scientists beyond the age of superannuation
Honorable Sir, Department of Personnel and Training O M No.26012/8/2011-Estt. (A) Dated the 16th May, 2011 stats that the laid down criteria for extension of service to the scientist should be in term of proviso to
i) FR 56 (d)
ii) Departmental Peer Review Committee (DPRCs) headed by the Secretary of the Scientific Departments are constituted by the DOP&T with the approval of Prime Minister for a term of 2 years to consider the cases of extension of service of scientists beyond 60 years and up to 62 years.
iii) Extension of service of eminent scientists of international stature
iv) Indicate whether this will block promotion opportunities of others in the Department
v) Will be processed further for approval of ACC through the office of the Establishment Officer
Sir, the above guidelines thoroughly overruled by DRDO establishment. When Dr APJ Kalam was granted extension of service he had the expertise and international recognition in his field (Missile Technology). Dr M Natrajan was granted extension on the basis of his work in MBT (Arjun Tank). Dr U R Rao, ISRO got extension because of his contribution in space technology.
DRDO, once Dr V K Atre became, SA to RM overruled the guidelines of DoPT provisions for extension. A new culture was established that is those scientists who were close to Dr Atre they were recommended for extension without justifying their contributions to science & technology. Afterwards the secretary of DRDO used this tool for those who are expert in misappropriation and manipulation of Government funds and misinterpretation of Government rules to their personal benefits.
These scientists nowhere stand as per guidelines of FR 56 (d) and you will find most of cases the scientists are involved totally in administrative job for years. Interestingly Secretary DRDO removed the required paras of Annexure FR 56 (d) where it states the justification why his service is needed and the details of contributions are thoroughly overruled.
Surprisingly, no one pointed these corrupt practices in the process of granting extension. Some applications which I have received by RTI from DoPT are enclosed for your ready reference. Which are the self explanatory, under the name of Defence research and under the shadow of official Secret Act 1923 and the bonafide possession of CCS Rules 1965 they have be-fooled the DoPT,PMO,ACC etc.
DRDO at an interval of every three months gives extension to at least 10-12 scientists, out of which not a single scientist deserve the recommendation as per guide lines of DoPT O M No.26012/8/2011-Estt. (A) Dated the 16th May, 2011 Normally DRDO Hqrs recommend extension to the (Service Provider) like Sh T Mohan Rao, Ex Director, GTRE (Massage Parlour Fame), DRDO recommend Dr S K Vasudeva of SPIC even beyond 64 years of age as he arranged the all cocktails parties + in 5* with help of CS Constructions etc and provide Mrs Kanimozhi‘s methods routing money through her daughter’s firm M/S M V- Grfix as IB already reported to PMO.
DRDO recommends the name of scientists/Directors who manage the misappropriation of funds of projects/ programs. As an example the case of Sh R C Aggarwal, Director, DEAL, Dehradun and Sh Iqbal Singh of IRDE, Dehradun Sh R C Aggarwal joined as Charge-man and become Director, DEAL as Scientist ‘G’ in 2007.
He has no international publications,No patents,No significant contribution in any projects at LRDE, NPOL, DLRL and DEAL where he was posted earlier
As a director he wrote an essay (cut paste copy technology) on Software Defined Radio and prepared a proposal for sanction having 60 sub contracts paras. This proposal opened up an avenue to distribute poor tax payer’s money. Rs 100 Crores sanctioned for SDR project and with few months he was promoted as Scientist ‘H’ and also got extension for two years and waiting Scientist for Director’s post Sh K N Rao of DEAL died with shock (Heart Attack).
Sh R C Aggarwal’s extension was recommended by Dr Arun Kumar, DOP, DRDO who was Scientist ‘E’ in 2001 when Sh R C Aggarwal was Scientist ‘F’. The DPRC which recommended Sh R C Aggarwal had a external member Dr P S Goel, Charman, RAC, whose contribution in ISRO as scientist is big zero, No international publications, No patents, only cut copy paste technology expertise.
Sh R C Aggarwal spent Rs 10 Lakh on TA/DA per year so he is able to contribute Rs 1.25 Lakhs per month in GPF account. As he is using Red beacon on his vehicle drawing Transport allowance using official driver in private car for fooling department.
Sh R C Aggarwal very bluntly says “the development of SDR will take 20 years time” and the PDC of SDR is 36 months.
Dr S C Jain who is enjoying extension but in the same time did not get the promotion to Scientist ‘H’, when he was not fit for promotion then how come he was recommended for extension in service, it can only happened in DRDO.
He has no international publications,No patents,No significant contribution in any projects at DEAL
But he is master in manipulation of government funds and misinterpretation of government rules in the interest of his boss. The reason he was benefited, was to get extension and job for his son who has fake qualification.
Sh Iqbal Singh Scientist ‘H’, IRDE, Dehradun got extension without justification of his scientific contribution.
He has no international publications,No patents,No significant contribution in any projects at IRDE
Only significant contribution is misappropriation of government funds, he gave orders to a firm where his son works
Dr S S Sundaram, Director, IRDE, Distinguished Scientist got extension for his golden achievement in project SAMYUKTA (Electronic Warfare), it is well known that Project SAMYUKTA started with Rs 250 Crores initial cost in May 1994 and when buried unceremoniously in 2006 it consumed Rs 6000 Crores of poor tax payer’s money.
Dr Arun Kumar, DOP, DRDO never did science and there is no question of scientific contribution. He is master in manipulation the governments rules and extend the path of favoritism to benefit DRDO’s top brasses wards. Appointment of his own daughter as scientist ‘B’ by violating all recruitment rules of DRDO. The enquiry is going on without any result like DRDO projects because the chairman of enquiry Dr Salwan, Ex DRDO scientist got Rs 80 Lakhs project with Rs 1 Lakh/month salary from Dr Arun Kumar itself.
The Honorable Prime Minister is requested to stop this criminal act of DRDO’s extension business, which they are recommending without justification. Please go through the recommended applications of DRDO scientists which I have received from DoPT through RTI.
Sir, this is the major reason of brain drain in DRDO because I am receiving lot of mails of ex DRDO young scientists from all over the world in my website www.corruptionindrdo.com, they share their experiences in this pathetic condition of DRDO.
Defence Minister, Room No 104- South Block, New Delhi- 110011
Shri Shashi Kant Sharma, Defence Secretary, Room !01- South Block, New Delhi – 110011
Ms. Alka Sirohi, Secretary (Personnel), Room No 112, North Block-110011
Dr V K Saraswat, D G (R&D), DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg, New Delhi=110105FR 56 (d) comparisonNo.26012/8/2011-Estt. (A)Government of IndiaMinistry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions(Department of Personnel and Training)North Block, New Delhi,Dated the 16th May, 2011
OFFICE MEMORANDUM
Subject: Grant of Extension of service of Scientists beyond the age of superannuation – Issue of instructions regarding.
The undersigned is directed to refer to Department of Personnel & Taining O.M. No.26012/6/2002-Estt.(A) dated 9.12.2002 (copy enclosed) on the subject mentioned above laying down the criteria for considering cases of extension of service of Scientists in terms of proviso to FR 56(d) and to state that the guidelines for extension of service of eminent scientists of international stature beyond 62 years have been further reviewed as a need has been felt for a rigorous Peer group screening by an inter disciplinary Committee of experts.
2. Departmental Peer Review Committee (DPRCs) headed by the Secretary of the Scientific Departments are constituted by the DOP&T with the approval of Prime Minister for a term of 2 years to consider the cases of extension of service of scientists beyond 60 years and up to 62 years.
3. It has now been decided with the approval of Prime Minister that the existing/reconstituted Departmental Peer Review Committee shall also do the first stage screening of Scientists for their extension beyond 62 years of age and thereafter the DPRCs’ recommendations will be placed before the Committee under the Cabinet Secretary provided that the DPRCs’ have at least two outside experts apart from Secretary (Personnel & Training). The DPRCs must give detailed justification for such extension based on merits of the case; the international stature of the person recommended and also indicates whether this will block promotion opportunities of others in the Department. Such recommendations of the DPRCs for extension of service of Scientists beyond 62 years will be sent of the Establishment Division of the Department of Personnel & Training for placing the cases before the Committee under Cabinet Secretary. Only such cases recommended by the Committee under Cabinet Secretary will be processed further for approval of ACC through the office of the Establishment Officer. Cases of extension of service of Scientists beyond 60 years and up to 62 years recommended by DPRC will continue to be sent directly to the office of Establishment Officer in DOP&T as at present.
4. All proposals for extension of service of Scientists beyond 62 years in terms of the 3rd proviso to FR 56(d) may, therefore, be processed keeping in view the above guidelines in addition to the criteria stipulated in the OM dated 9.12.2010.
(P.Prabhakaran)Director (E)
DoPT RTI replyDoPT Reply for Sh R C Aggarwal Page 1DoPT Reply for Sh R C Aggarwal page 2DoPT Reply For Sh R C Aggarwal page 3DoPT Reply for Sh Iqbal Singh page 1DoPT Reply for Sh Iqbal Singh Page 2
To save our premier organization from clutches of corrupt official it is time to submit PIL’s in honorable Supreme Court/ High Court. The people who retired or serving in DRDO are very well know that how much neck deep corruption, nepotism, favoritism and misuse of funds prevailing in DRDO.
So far DRDO has escaped from the attentions of the various agencies like CAG, CVC, CBI, Income Tax, Custom and Sales Tax etc. The www.corrutionindrdo.com received lot of information which can attract the above all agencies and in few cases the information also about how DRDO fooling or misleading these agencies.
We have to tell the honorable Court that DRDO senior management is as corrupt as Sh P J Thamos, Ex- CVC, or as Justice Soumitra Sen (first judge impeached by Rajyashabha) and some corrupt as Sh Andimuthu Raja (2G scam fame minister) as Smt Kanimozhi Karunanidhi (2G scam fame member of Parliament) as Sh Suresh Kalmadi ( CWG scam fame member of Parliament) are now in Tihar Jail.
DRDO established in the year 1958 with a humble beginning to technical support to the defence forces, as an integral part Ministry of Defence along with defence production units. The successive war fought by India such as 1962 with China, 1956 & 1971 with Pakistan and 1999 Kargil war it has been proved that DRDO has not played significant role and exhausted billion of billion poor tax payers money.
The promised were like bring moon on Earth as programs like IGMDP (Missile Program), MBT (Arjun), SAMYUKTA(Electronic Warfare), LCA(Tejas Aircraft), RADARS, SHIPS, SUBMARINE, Bread, Butter, Jam etc.
Until 1980 DRDO spread from Kanyakumari to Leh and Gujrat to North East. The huge Infrastructure were built (1 Lakh Crores) and high technical man power recruited ( 30000) by passing UPSC and aim was to develop import substitute but with the passage of time:-
DRDO forgot all the commitments to the defence forces and instead of strengthen the forces it played role of obstacles for procurement latest technology.
DRDO directors, Hqrs justify their successive failures but consumed 7-8 % of defence budget annually.
The total failures were reviewed by ministry of defence and 439 projects was short closed/ aborted(before time)
Programs which were initiated by 1990 with the promise of deliverable products were failed measurably the poor tax payer’s money which were supposed to play a positive role in country’s defence were mere wasted.
Today we are importing the import substitute latest example like SDR and befooled the countryman.
In the name of SECRECY article’s of 1927 & 1965 seals the corrupt DRDO top brasses and they are siphoning the precious money in the broad day light to their son’s, daughter’s, spouse, relatives and friends bank accounts.
Orders are placed with foreign firms through open / limited tenders but the case is negotiated with these private pocket firms which are related to them. As a result huge DRDO money goes to massage parlour, Cocktails Party’s and dowry with Mercedes Benz ( Ex Director DIITM, DRDO Hqrs was generously to give Mercedes Benz to his Son In Law)
Fighting against corruption prevailing in DRDO since 2001 have collected enough information and ready to file PIL . Through website www.corruptionindrdo.com many many honest, patriotic and nationalist people join their hands and supplied lot information about corruption, nepotism to save our DRDO.
I appeal to my brothers and sisters of serving and retired DRDO officials to join hands in support the PIL’s for cleaning the DRDO from corrupt officials and make DRDO a perfect productive organization so our future talented boys and girls not quit from DRDO due to unethical environment.
The proposed PIL will be submitted through Sh Vinay Kumar Mittal, Ex Scientist ‘G’, DRDO and whistle blower of NTRO. The PIL’s will be presented by Sh Prashant Bhushan the noted advocated Sh Anna’s right hand.
Extension / contracts/ consultancy of corrupt DRDO officials beyond the 60 years of service
Recruitment/ Assessment tool used to encourage corruption/ nepotism/favoritism and kick backs in recruitment and assessments( DRDO RAC activities and the role of RAC chairman)
To fix the accountability. So far nobody is answerable to anybody in DRDO. It has inculcated a culture to encourage bluff and give benefit to bluff masters.
To expose all DRDO serving/ retire top officials having companies which are involving in unethical business directly or indirectly and siphoning the poor tax payer’s money.
Sh Vinay Kumar Mittal, Ex Scientist ‘G’, DRDO has kindly agreed and offered his services to submit PIL’s who already brought the NTRO corruption in the notice of honorable Supreme Court as well as in the notice of common people of India.
From Vinay Kumar Mittal vkm021055@gmail.comTo prabhu@dandriyal.comDate Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 6:48 AM
Subject Request for information for filing PIL in Delhi High Court against DRDO
Dear Prabhu,
i am an avid reader of your site about what is happening in DRDO.
DRDO of today is not the DRDO of yesteryear’s . There no doubt that there is massive corruption , favoritism , nepotism , misuse of official position and funds in various laboratorieses of DRDO. DRDO Laboratory Director are ‘neo kings’ who are law unto themselves . I remember a Director’s conference in mid 900’s when Dr. Arunachalam was SA and T.N Sheshan was Defence Secretary . He very open said that ‘”when you visit a DRDO lab there will be a long pathway – you open one gate then second gate and finally a third gate to see the king (Director) sitting and ruling over his empire. They consider themselves nothing less than kings – the Maharaja with lab staff and scientist as their praja”.
I have personally witnessed all this and deeply saddened
What went wrong with NTRO is this DRDO culture which was imported by DRDO crowd i.e. KVSS Prasad Rao and M.S.Vijayraghavan .This DRDO culture destroyed NTRO. Now Hon’ble Supreme Court taking a very very serious view of happenings in NTRO , things are expected to move in right direction. Based on the evidence provided by me , I have reasons to believe that some very very senior functioneries will definately be arrested after Hon’ble Supreme Court goes throught CAG and CVC report on NTRO.
I am now filing four more PILs in Supreme Court throught Sh. Prashant Bhushan to the issue of corruption in NTRO with all the evidnece . This became essentail since there were many issues which could not be covered in my earlier PIL/SLP in the matter related to NTRO.
I have a request to make . Kindly provide me with evidence ( RTI responses, copies of documents if any and details of cases ) about corruption, misuse of official position , favoritism , nepotism in DRDO and I will file PIL in Delhi High Court against DRDO. This is essential since many of you are already working in DRDO and give3n the poor moral character of officials of DRDO , you may not like to take up the issue with you bosses. As far as as I am concerned , i have nothing to loose and worry about – iIhave faced enough threats of liquidation , arrest etc and I have taken this in my stride . When you challenge this corrupt system , this is bound to happen.
Unfortunately DRDO has escaped attention of the agencies/ institutions because of general impression that ‘ they are poor scientists only and not Income Tax , Sales Tax or other public dealing departments”. We have to tell the world that DRDO senior management is as corrupt as any other department.
Please do not worry about the cost . This can be worked out separately in an transparent manner.
Please put this appeal on your web site. The documents can be provided either through you or directly to me at following address
To 18th August 2011
The Defence Minister
Room No -104, South Block
New Delhi – 110011
Reference: a) Your letter No 1409-VIP/RM/2011 dated 21st March 2011
b) Your letter No 1409-VIP/RM/2236 dated 20th May 2011
Honorable Sir, The mood of country man from village to industry, to Government agency has taken in one line- fight against corruption.
The patriotism has come out and the nuisance mongers are still denying the facts. They have no courage to face the real scenario. In DRDO a practice has been followed for a quite some time that DRDO must have a big programs without the feasibility study and without the realizing the strength and weakness. A 100 crores was sanctioned to DEAL, Dehradun to develop Software Defined Radio (SDR), but the truth behind the green room is the laboratory has not developed a single frequency radio on its own and when they are talking to develop SDR it appears a big crime.
The knowledgeable team with in the country who has knowledge about radio they have not contacted prior to conceive the proposal of “SDR”. One such reaction of a patriot and technocrat is enclosed.
This reaction is result of the open tender floated by DEAL, Dehradun’ SDR’s team. Tender: DEAL/206/4043/2011-2012/D100/074 Dated: 09, Aug 2011, Opening Date: 27, Sep 2011 tender for Development of SCA Core Framework.
The expert feels that specification have been laid down by a person who does not know a bit of radio.
The file has initiated with the estimated cost of Rs 6 Crores with a delivery period as mentioned in tender is not later than 82 weeks from the date of signing of contract. It is interesting to note that the PDC of SDR project is July 2013 and this assignment of Development of SCA Core Framework definitely going to cross the PDC limit of the SDR.
The sources said that the estimated cost is exorbitantly high and Malafide intension and misappropriation of government money is clearly visible. The tender directly or indirectly will go to hand of M/s Spectrum Signal Processing BC Canada
This is for the information of ugly act of Sh R C Aggarwal, Director, (extension) DEAL, Dehradun.
Note – This 100 Crores project encourage him to increase GPF subscription upto 1.25 Lakh per month, hope this input will compel you to think twice for DRDO corrupt bosses.
Enclose – E-mail of a Technocrat regarding SDR Project
Dear sir, I have gone to yr site. It is really interesting to see how these govt departments are working for the benefit of our beloved country. See I have enclosed one tender fr one of labs of drdo . I hav had a bitter experience with them in the past. They do not know anything but pretend that they r all experts. This tender documents clearly shows that they r not only trying to get a partner for developing their project and that too at their own interest. They do not know a bit about radios forget software radios. How goverment has sanctioned them this project when there under-statement in the tender clearly shows that they hardly know the software architecture of the their would-be-radio.yet They r all set to review the work of tenderer. They will try to get it done for themselves and yet not share the IPR and Copyrights. Finally they will get it procured from somewhere and put their stickers on it and claim that it is theirs. I have come to know from our principals in US they (MOD) have already STUCK A DEAL with a Company for supply of items for three service and the project is only to fill the gaps. The persons in DEAL have hardly any experience in writing codes and data how they r going to evaluate from others. Perhaps they will get to learn a lot from the DP. Sir pl give this tender wider publicity because it is only a farce. They get all the information from you and will abort the contract later on. Beware all tenderers! they r all fraud and corrupt people.
Keep doing good work sir,
Warm regards
Tender Details – “Development of SCA core framework”, DEAL* Defence Electronics Application Laboratory, DRDO. Dehradun Start Date 10-08-2011 16:20:33 End Date 27-09-2011 13:30:00
Contact
For any technical queries the DPs may contact the following:
Shri L. C. MangalScientist ‘F’Group Head – SDR Baseband Systems GroupPhone-0135-2223113 / 2789081Email-lcmangal@deal.drdo.inShri Satendra Kumar YadavScientist ‘E’Phone-0135-2223173Email-satendra@deal.drdo.in
To
The Defence Minister
Room No -104, South Block
New Delhi – 110011
Reference: a) Your letter No 1409-VIP/RM/2011 dated 21st March 2011
b) Your letter No 1409-VIP/RM/2236 dated 20th May 2011
Honorable Sir,
As the chancellor of DIAT, Pune you have taken the decision to remove Dr. L M Patnaik but have decided to place Dr Prahlada who is yet another big corrupt DRDO official. Sources reveal that yesterday Fax order’s saying Dr L M Patnaik was terminated; it shows the situation (discipline) of high profile deemed Defence University.
The selection of Vice Chancellor for DIAT is not done in accordance with the guidelines of Government of India, which is laid down for such prestigious appointments. Please refer the Gazette Notification No 146, Part-II, Section-4 –
The Universities are Independent bodies and the university Vice Chancellor is the leader of an institution of higher education. According to the standard he / she must be a noted scholar (Dr.Parhalada rules to accomplish this?), who is responsible and excellent (Dr.Parhalada meet these criteria?), as well as the person who has high moral. (Who once said to an SC DRDO Scientist “you people are not born for higher studies”). Sir, you are very well aware of this incident of DRDO’s M Tech selection board. http://bit.ly/p20SwG
He was posted as CC (R&D) in DRDO Headquarters in November 2005 and since then he was staying at C – 7 Guest House. JCDA, R&D reveled in RTI response that he is drawing HRA as well. He has also attracted disciplinary action as in the CCS (CC & A) 1965 rules of action against Dr. Prahlada. Why not take steps to DRDO pending lawsuit against Dr. Prahlada. (RTI Enclosed for your ready reference)
The working of DRDO is now in full swing corruption and nepotism. In Vice Chancellor for DIAT advertisement it was put on Internal Intranet DRONA of DRDO. It is 100% violation of recruitment rules for such higher post and the best part of this out of 7356 so called best scientists, only the most corrupt official was chosen. No patents, no international publications, no academic excellence was considered in the case of Vice Chancellor for DIAT.
Sir, your image in the country is one of most honest persons and recently UPA Chairman; Smt. Sonia Gandhi had also shown her faith on you by delegating powers in absence of her. But in the cases of DRDO it is not understandable that why you are taking such lenient steps by allowing these corrupt scientists of DRDO to thrive in spite of receiving all the evidences against them. You simply believe that constituting a committee is the only way to handle the situation.
i) The case of DLRL the complete documentary evidences are being submitted for your kind consideration. What happened to your letter I received in the following context — http://bit.ly/phH6vR
A committee constituted – Ms Shobha Verma, Addl Director, Mr Sashtri, Director Anurag Cell and Sh SL Badnikar, Director GAETEC. They recorded all statements and submitted the report but nothing about corrupt officials of DLRL.
ii) The Case of Sh T Mohan Rao against whom the FIR was registered and he spent one night in jail but next day he got the bail with the help of same lawyer who bailed out the supplier of GTRE Sh VN Narayan, representative of ILN Technologies. The question was raised by Honorable Member of Parliament Sh Navtej Singh Siddhu on 8th August 2011 but Joint Secretary replied that matter is sub judicious, Sh Mohan Rao was only removed from the Directorship of GTRE but has been attached with CEMILAC another Lab of DRDO in Bangalore. Sh T Mohan Rao even not informed his superior about his detonation officially and very next day he went to GTRE and made another Identity card from the security, as his mobile and identity card were seized by the police during interrogation. It is difficult to digest that such a high profile man enjoying extension of service without work and on the other side you only announced the removal in Commodore Sukhjinder Singh for Admiral Gorshkov similar case. Why so soft corners for DRDO corrupt officials? http://bit.ly/p8m6Vahttp://bit.ly/qYJOzq
iii) The case of Dr S K Vasudeva, working in contract in SPIC DRDO where plenty of unaudited funds are looted by corrupt officials, you already verified it with IB. the list of companies which were indulging in SPIC game is so lengthy and you are aware about it through the IB reports. Still the Dr S K Vasudeva is enjoying his status in SPIC while the new Director, Dr Satish Kumar is only puppet. The daughter of Dr S K Vasudeva, Ms Vinita just removed her stuff from the involved company’s premises few days ago. She is the owner of M V Grafix and her role is like Mrs Kanimozi in 2G Scam.
iv) Irregularities being committed by Dr. Arun Kumar, DOP, DRDO Hqrs. in the matter of recruitment of appointment to the post of Scientist ‘B’ ( A Group ‘A’ Gazetted Post in DRDO) http://bit.ly/npjQ8X
An independent inquiry committee has been constituted in DRDO HQ, New Delhi Vide Directorate of Vigilance and Security Note No. DVS/02/2053/P/01 Dated 17Mar. 2011 regarding the acts of corruption committed by Dr. Arun Kumar in getting her daughter Ms. Swati Srivastava as Scientist ‘B’ in response to the advertisement no. 66 item no. 34 meant for stream of Biotechnology. Ms. Swati Srivastava did’t has MSC. in Biotechnology, but she had her MSC in Environmental Biology. The concerned file no. is DRDO/V&S/ INQ- AK/2011. http://bit.ly/pFaMUe
Dr.Arun Kumar also manipulated in DRDO Official records, in the seniority roll of his daughter the information is as follows
Pin No S.No. Name Estt DoB Date of Appt. Education Discipline 2004AB1131 1542 Swati Srivastav DIPAS 23/9/1981 1/7/2009 MSc(BiotTech) Biotechnology
Why are your hands closed for taking any decisions to these most corrupt and anti-national official of DRDO or they are managing any deal like NTRO’s Dr MS Vijayraghwan. http://bit.ly/mRpdU9
Sir, I am requesting you to please take appropriate action to restore the faith in DRDO’s best young talents otherwise they will leave this esteemed organization as more than 1200 scientist have done during the last three years.
To
The Defence Minister
Room No -104, South Block
New Delhi – 110011
Honorable Sir,
I wish to bring to your notice another case of irregularities being committed by Dr. Arun Kumar, DOP, DRDO Hqrs. in the matter of recruitment of appointment to the post of Scientist ‘B’ ( A Group ‘A’ Gazetted Post in DRDO)
Sh. Dharmender Kumar was the Senior Technical Assistant -‘B’ (Non Gazetted Post) in SPIC, DRDO, Delhi. On his selection for appointment to the post of Assistant Professor( Mathemetics) in NDA, Khadakwasla, Pune, he resigned from the post of Senior Technical Assistant -‘B’ , which was accepted by the competent authority and he was relived on 20th December 2010 from SPIC, DRDO, Delhi. He joined the post of Assistant Professor (Mathematics) in NDA, Khadakwasla, Pune on 22nd December 2010.
Sh. Dharmender Kumar on his selection for appointment to the post of Scientist ‘B’ in DRDO through Limited Departmental Competitive Examination for the post of Scientist ‘B’ in DRDO vide DOP, DRDO letter No DOP/05/56002/LDCE 09-20 dated 23th December 2010.
As per clause 2 (h) of terms & condition of offer of appointment letter, Sh. Dharmender Kumar was required to assume the appointment of Scientist ‘B’ within one month from the date of issue of above referred offer letter (23rd December 2010),failing which the offer of appointment will be cancelled( as mentioned in the)
Further, as per terms & condition of offer of appointment issued to the Sh. Dharmender Kumar on 23rd December 2010 i.e. after 3 days of his being SOS from DRDO, and 1 day after joining the NDA, Pune, he was required to undergo a medical test by the prescribed medical board and required essentially to undergo a training course of Scientist ’B’ at DIAT, Pune. Further as per Directorate of Human Resources, DRDO letter No DHRD/17050/DIAT/POINTS16/C/M/1 dated 31st March 2011 that 20 weeks duration mandatory training course for Scientist ’B’ has been scheduled w.e.f 20th April 2010.
Sh. Dharmender Kumar should had not been issued with the letter of offer of appointment to the post of Scientist ‘B’ in DRDO on 23rd December 2010, when he at own resigned and SOS from DRDO on 20th December 2010 and joined NDA, Pune on 22nd December 2010. The post of Scientist ‘B’ against which he was selected was meant out for the departmental candidate of DRDO as such, when he was not entitled to be given the offer of appointment to the post of Scientist ‘B’ in DRDO
When the last date(22nd January 2011) bu assumption of charge of appointment to the post of Scientist ‘B’ in DRDO and joining the mandatory training course in DIAT, Pune by 20th April 2011 has already expired, his request for joining the post of Scientist ‘B’, DRDO should not have been entertained.
Sh. Dharmender Kumar vide his letter dated 3rd February 2011 written directly to Scientific Adviser to RM (and not through proper channel of his office NDA, Pune) requested to extend the period of joining in DRDO as Scientist ‘B’ for a period of 2 months. The extended period of joining time expired on 22nd February 2011.
As per the terms & condition of offer of appointment to the post of Scientist ‘B’ in DRDO as well as under the provision of DRDS Rules 1979 and amendments made thereof, the offer of appointment was required to be cancelled when he has failed to adhere to the terms & condition, a offer of appointment.
From the contents of letter dated 3rd February 2011 of Sh. Dharmender Kumar it is under that he was bypassed the official channel by writing directly to Scientific Adviser to RM, when he has holding the post of Assistant Professor (Mathematics) in NDA, where he was supposed to taught lesson overall discipline, including with regards to correspondence, command & control. He has left DRDO and NDA not for the sake of nation, but consideration (refer to para of his letter 3rd February 2011) both the offer being equally lucrative, more ever; the growth prospect and financial incentive were higher in the said venture. He has send the copy of his letter directly to the DOP, DRDO and not to his earlier controlling authority i.e. SPIC, DRDO
It is highly regretted to say that instead of taking any action against him for the acts of subordination, which are subversive of discipline, and cancelling the offer of appointment to the post of Scientist ‘B’ in DRDO, he has been allowed to join the post of Senior Technical Assistant -‘B’ in SPIC, DRDO on 2nd May 2011 and the very next day i.e. 3rd May 2011 itself the DOP processed his case vigorous speed to evaluate him to join the post of Scientist ‘B’ in DRDO, thus violating the provision of:
a) Terms & Condition of the offer of appointment letter to the post of Scientist ‘B’
b) DRDS Rules 1979
c) Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rule 1964
d) DHRD,DRDO Letter No DHRD/17050/DIAT/POINTS16/C/M/1 dated 31st March 2011
I would like to request you to kindly consider the above facts and ask the Defence Secretary to conduct a thorough inquiry into cases of misuse, abuse and unauthorized use of office and position of DOP,DRDO by Dr Arun Kumar, Scientist ’H’ Outstanding Scientist, DRDO Scientist of the Year Award in the year 2008. So that rule of law is allowed to prevail in the organization in a transparent manner.
We all look forward to your statements “Nurture talent, ensure fairness” “fairness at all levels”, but Sir, DRDO’s honest employees are eagerly waiting for implementing your statements, I ensure on behalf of all DRDO’s honest employees if the day this is implemented, the whole nation will see the great output of DRDO.
Please ask your aides that DRDO employees who are working very hard in harsh environment and giving their best to organization are also the part of DRDO family. And if they ignore their grievances, then be ready to face the exposer of each and every corrupt activity whether it is related to benefiting their family members and wards in recruitment or business.
Please go through the following mail and do needful at the earliest.
from sfcemployees sfcemployees@rediffmail.comto “prabhudoon@gmail.com” prabhudoon@gmail.comdate Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 9:57 AMsubject sfc employees rights violationmailed-by rediffmail.comsigned-by rediffmail.com hide details 9:57 AM (9 hours ago)
Hello sir,
Thanks for your initiative against your corruption in DRDO. We hope you will also fight human rights violation in DRDO. Please publish this letter in your website and kindly send a copy to SA, defence minister and prime minister for their kind help and consideration.
VIOLATION OF RIGHTS OF EMPLOYEES AT SF COMPLEX, DRDO, JAGDALPUR
SF Complex is located at ??? (We Don’t know exactly!!!).
The official address of SF Complex, is “SF COMPLEX, AIRPORT TERMINAL BUILDING, JAGDALPUR-494001”. All of us (the employees) of SFC are given appointment letters with above address as reporting place. But, all are forced to report at the above address as well as at its work centre located at Girola village, Bakawand block, Bastar district. This location is completely out of 40 Kms away from municipality (Jagdalpur) of the official address.
Where should all the employees report? As per rule they should report at the place of posting as per the appointment letter. But it is not so. Is it (forcing to report at other place) not violation of an employee’s right to report at the posting place? Sometimes management says that reporting place is at Girola and sometimes Airport terminal building, Jagdalpur. It is clear cut case of harassment that we are facing here. Let me site the example: one of the scientists, named Shri Kushal Sahoo, was killedin an accident near Bakawand last year while returning from the Girola site to Jagdalpur in Bolero vehicle. Bakawand police station filed FIR and accident report (you can refer the same with the police station). When settling the case the DRDO HQs asked the official movement order to consider it as death while performing duty. As the movement order was not issued actually (even for the all of us) for him and few more travelling in the same vehicle who are also injured, management of SF Complex made a statement of case stating that “Kusahl Sahoo is travelling for the purpose of meeting at Airport Terminal Building, Jagdalpur office”. Why this kind of statement if the travelling from Jagdalpur to Girola and back is official and as per the rule? After this accident all the staff took a decision and reported at posting place only. This happened for two days and later management has interfered and threatened to report at Girola. If we don’t report we will get termination letter as many of us are on probation. Later we were forced to apply for leave for that two days otherwise there will be serious action. And finally we were forced to report at Girola. Is it not violation of our right? Reporting at posting place is not correct? Then why appointment letters were given like that? After this episode management called the great DIRECTOR-DOP, Dr ARUN KUMAR and then DIRECTOR ASL, AVINASH CHNANDER. These people have come and told us that Girola is reporting place, not airport terminal building Jagdalpur, and shouted, threatened to do any extent if we don’t report at Girola. Working hours are considered from the time reported at Girola to time left from there.
Sir please tell us what we have to do? We have to follow appointment letters or we have to live in miserable and harassed life? We have to travel unofficially without movement orders like this? Even buses are already outdated and crossed their service life and travelling without vehicle move order. If, any, accident happens to these vehicles, who is responsible? Director, ASL or General Manager, SF Complex?
Kindly solve our problem as Director, DOP or Director, ASL or GM, SFC will not solve this problem. Please allow us to work in peaceful environment to make DRDO and our nation great!!!.
The Sunday guardian exposed DRDO’s Pune labs corrupt activities today morning and also Indian Express Pune on July 24, 2011.
HEMRL to save Dr. Hardwar Singh’s company M/S Viswaat Chemicals start doing all efforts to hide all the corrupt acts for favoring the M/S Viswaat Chemicals.
Today morning HEMRL security withdraws all bio-metric cards issued to GOGO (M/S Viswaat Chemicals) work force.
Col Mathur, Security Officer issued simple without monogram (HEMRL) cards to GOGO (M/S Viswaat Chemicals) work force.
A register put for in/out for signature of GOGO (M/S Viswaat Chemicals) work force.
The two-wheeler entry for GOGO (M/S Viswaat Chemicals) work force was stopped.
Now the numbers of GOGO (M/S Viswaat Chemicals) work force was tallied with contract order.
This exercise today takes time to issue the new cards so GOGO (M/S Viswaat Chemicals) work force reached their respective job site nearly 1100 hrs to 1130 hrs
The GOGO (M/S Viswaat Chemicals) work force is now asking the refund of Rs 500 which HEMRL deposited for issuing bio-metric cards.
Hope S A to R M will see these inputs and will ask do this to all other sites like ASL, ACEM, SF Complex and other sites where Dr Hardwar Singh is running his empire, because SA cannot dare to touch the Singh.
To Date – 30th July 2010 Smt. Sonia Gandhi, Chairperson, United Progressive Alliance 10-Janpath, New Delhi – 110 011
Respected Smt Sonia Ji The Times of India has reported the “Major Clean Up in Graft hit Intel Agency”
The corruption in purchase has been investigated and major penalties awarded additional secretary Dr MS Vijayraghvan, NTRO was directly under PMO, NTRO has been conceived by the DRDO. All those people holding the high offices in NTRO have served in DRDO at least for 20 -25 years.
The DRDO corruption culture is running in their veins. DRDO is training ground for technocrats to learn the skills of corruption using all technical terminology to fool forces, bureaucrats, financial experts and as well as politicians.
Defence Research, National; Technical Research, Space Research, Atomic Research all these research organizations started to accomplish a mission, to ease the life of common citizen of India, to enhance the economy growth, but the common man has lost the faith because they consume a heft some but deliverables are like piece of peanuts.
If we compare of technology development of North Korea probably we can find our self nowhere. North Korea is isolated from the rest of the world but they have the technology which can challenge the developed countries. It is due to the discipline inculcated in their citizens from decades.
Why we are not able to give due respect to our constitution. If we are not getting “some thing”, than we remembers the various articles of constitutions and there is lot of hue & cry for violation of fundamental right. But when its come to repay the due to constitution we simply ignore and than one man scratch another man’s back or blame game start.
DRDO in its successive failures of projects/ programs have justified the expenditure by comparing the loss occurred due to rail accident, or loss occurred by natural calamities/ floods etc.
Sometimes DRDO people compare their assets with assets of XYZ, who won the election and enjoyed the facility provided by the government. This sickness expressed just to justifies the expenditure where the system did not perform due to incompetency of top DRDO officials. There is rat race in DRDO now days to become rich like a smugglers become rich in short period.
The tactics used by NTRO in their procurement as well as recruitments are followed exactly are one tone, carbon copy of DRDO existing culture.
Honorable Prime Minister, Honorable Defence Minister must not ignore DRDO from the list of sick, unproductive organization, if it continuo like this, if accountability not fixed than history will repeat once again and the fighting forces lose their precious lives it is all due to non availability of latest frontline technology.
To 31st July 2011The Defence Minister Room No -104, South Block New Delhi – 110011
Subject: Favoritism, Nepotism and Plagiarism
Honorable Sir,
Dr P S Goel, Chairman, RAC, DRDO does not deserve this high office. He is a byproduct of favoritism, nepotism and plagiarism.
From his bio-data two things are missing because he has very cleverly written names of those awards which are purely fabricated in ISRO. Prestigious Shanti Swaroop Bhatnager Medal and International publications with volume no, Page no, year of publication and the name of journal he should write if at all he has contributed.
Due to Policy of the government he was made director in one small unit of ISRO Hqrs. His subject expertise is such that he appreciates only the work of CP Technology (Cut Paste Technology) as an example the following paper tells the strong and itself explanatory. Under his able leadership RAC has converted into one of the office where transfer posting, promotions and recruitments are sold.
Honorable High Court’s Judge , Justice SR Singh inquired about plagiarism of then Vice Chancellor Kumaoun University and result was the immediate resignation of Vice Chancellor Prof B S Rajput in 2003.
Raksha Mantri and Scientific Adviser to Raksha Mantri are requested to investigate the enclosed following paper which is the evidence of corrupt practices prevailing in DRDO and take appropriate action against Dr. P S Goel and the plagiarist scientist, withdraw the medal given to her and also remove the paper from DRDO Technology Spectrum May pp 243-246. So that Indian defence forces may get their confidence on DRDO or else the paper will be put up for legal action so that plagiarism nurtured by Dr P S Goel is suitably dealt with.
RAC letter received page 1RAC letter received page 2RAC received letter Page 3Paper Published by Ms Jyoti Bhalla
Paper Published by Ms Jyoti BhallaPaper Published by Ms Jyoti Bhalla
Paper Published by Ms Jyoti Bhalla
ACTUAL References from which ditto paragraphs are copied
1. http:/ len.wikipedia.org/
a. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real-timeoperating system
b. http://en.wikipedia.org/wikilHistoryofSymbian
c. http:/ /en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbian
2. http://www.dotcominfoway.com/attachmentsI268 White-paper -on- Mobile-OS-and-efforts on-Open-standards. pdf
3. http://www.tolmol.com/bp/mobile-phones/mobile-operating-system-os.htm
4. http://www.scribd.com/doc/35602787 IMobile-Application-Testing
5. http://www.dauniv.ac.in/downloads/Mobilecomputing/MobileCompChap 14L02MobileOS. llilf (Oxford University Press 2007. All rights reserved)
6. http://www.itbusinessedge.com/topics/show.aspx?t=752
7. http://www.osdata.com/kind/kinds.htm
8. http://symbianresources.com/tutorials/ general I mobileos/MobileOperatingSystems. pdf
9. http://books.google.co.in/books?id=WivXOHmVTIMC&pg=P A31&lpg=P A31&dq=”familia
r+tasks+such+as+reading+e-mail” &source=bl&ots=q
(Operating System Principles – By Abraham Silberschatz)
10. http://www.scribd.com/doc/52228167/321CONCLUSION
11. http://wiki.nectec.or.th/gitiwiki/pub/Knowledge/Symbian OS/simbian02.ipg
12. http:/ Itechnox.org/symbian-os/
13. http://www.itu.dk/courses/ISOM/E2005/Nokia and Symbian OS%5Bl%5D.pdf
14. http://www.iavamidlet.comI2008/07 I 121how-to-install-the-nokia-s60-sdk-in-netbeans-for
i2me-development.html
15. http://wiki.answers.com/O/What are the advantage of symbian mobile os
16. www.verifysoft.com/de coveritv casestudy symbian.pdf
Appeal to clean DRDO of corrupt and anti-national officials
