All posts by Prabhu

Extension plea of top scientists rejected, govt bats for younger directors

Manu Pubby New Delhi, November 4, 2014 | UPDATED 20:04 IST- Indiatodayin

The government has struck down a request by the DRDO to grant four of its top scientists a service extension with the Prime Minister stepping in personally to ensure that the organisation does not add to its massive bank of scientists who have been working well past their retirement age.

In a move that has brought cheer to the younger scientists of the organization, the PMO refused to entertain a request by the DRDO’s departmental peer review committee to extend the service of four of its lab directors beyond the age of 60 years.

In the past, recommendations of the peer review committee were routinely accepted by the government and in most cases scientists were given an extension of two years to four years. However, as reported by the India Today, the new government is keen to have a younger profile of scientists in the organization and has already expressed concern about the increasing age profile in a field that requires cutting edge technology and expertise.

Sources said that four scientists including Prof MP Kaushik (DRDE Director), Dr VC Padaki (DEBEL Director) and DS Sistla Ravind (LRDE Director) had been recommended by DRDO Chief Avinash Chander for an extension of service. While the file made it all the way through the appointments committee of cabinet, sources said that the request was turned at the Prime Minister’s desk. The DLRL Lab director is also not to get an extension of service.

Officials said that the decision not to grant an extension was taken as part of the government’s new policy to promote younger talent with PM Narendra Modi already instructing that at least five labs should have directors below the age of 35.

However, as things most top scientists at the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) who are tasked with creating weapons for future have passed the retirement age of 60 and are on service extensions.

The old age problem starts from the very head of the organization with DRDO chairman Avinash Chander already on two extensions. The previous government even approved a extraordinary contract to give Chander a 18-month contractual tenure from November when he turns 64, the maximum age till which service extensions can be given.

As reported by the India Today, most director generals at the headquarters and the heads of six of DRDO’s 54 labs and establishments are currently on extension. As many as 10 of the 16 top DRDO scientists are on extension. Internal surveys have found that nearly 87 per cent of the young scientists who join DRDO soon get disenchanted with the archaic, rigid structure of the research body that does not reward extraordinary performance with proportional career growth.

DRDO – CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) Approach – HESCO, Shuklapur Village – Picnic in the name of rural technology

Another picnic spot developed by DRDO in HESCO, Shuklapur, Prem Nagar, Dehradun.

DRDO officials are found to visit hill area, earlier ITM, Mussoorie is very popular for all senior top DRDO officials especially in summer. The ITM Mussoorie conduct lot of courses in various topics/ subjects but passage of time it can be verified that the officials visiting Mussoorie is related with topic or not.

Now the country is vibrating in the name of corporate social responsibility and DRDO officials sense the pulse and catch the fish in right time.

R&D Eng, Pune, DRDO installed a mountain bridge in shuklapur for demonstration purpose and for photo session purpose July.

Sh Anil Dattar, DG and Dr. Guruprasd, Director, R&D (E) was the visited shuklapur and have good photo session for their profile but interestingly two more DRDO officials adjusted in frame one Dr A K Gupta, Ex Director, IRDE, Laser man and Sh R C Agarwal, SDR man. What they are doing there,  Dr Gupta did  bridge alignment with Laser, and Dr R C Agarwal collect the data of  mountain bridge resonance may be it help to complete his 100 crore project SDR in time – but it seems it looking impossible. Best part of their presence that both are in extension of service and wasting the precious tax payer’s money in Shukla pur picnic spot.

(from left to right) Dr AK Gupta, Director, Instruments Research & Development Establishment (IRDE) Dehradun, Dr S. Guruprasad, Director, Research & Development Establishment (Engineers), Pune, a village lady, Dr Anil Joshi, founder of the NGO Himalayan Environmental Studies & Conservation Organisation (HESCO), Dehradun, Shri RC Agarwal, Director, Defence Electronics Application Laboratory (DEAL), Dr R. Chidambaram, Principal Scientific Adviser to the Government of India, and AM Datar, Director General, Armament & Combat Engineering Systems (ACE), DRDO.
(from left to right) Dr AK Gupta, Director, Instruments Research & Development Establishment (IRDE) Dehradun, Dr S. Guruprasad, Director, Research & Development Establishment (Engineers), Pune, a village lady, Dr Anil Joshi, founder of the NGO Himalayan Environmental Studies & Conservation Organisation (HESCO), Dehradun, Shri RC Agarwal, Director, Defence Electronics Application Laboratory (DEAL), Dr R. Chidambaram, Principal Scientific Adviser to the Government of India, and AM Datar, Director General, Armament & Combat Engineering Systems (ACE), DRDO.

Today’s photo session was grand with Dr Manas Mandal, DG, Life Sciences, LIC man Dr Bhuwnesh Kumar, Dr Vijay veer, Director, Tezpur, who is famous for purchase daru from public fund, (double fayda home visit) Dr R B Srivastava, Director, DIHAR, Leh, he can contribute good inputs to HESCO specially in agriculture area of Uttarakhand mountain areas. Dr H B Batra, Director, DFRL, Mysore, He can give new ideas for recipes to Dr Anil Joshi, Padamshree for Uttarakhands agriculture products, Koda, Jungora etc.  Dr Guruparsad, Director, R&D E already given Mountain Bridge and fixed his life time boarding lodging with HESCO whenever he will tour to Uttarakhand, Rest bunch of DRDO officials were joined tour as outing. Dr MR Bhutyani, Director, DTRL, Dr Joglekar, Dr Naresh Kumar, Dr Nassem Ahmad, Director, DRL, Haldwani , Dr Atul Grower (both joined outing only to flatter Dr Manas Mandal), Dr S S  Negi, Director, IRDE was there because of compulsion, he is not related with subject nor this picnic is his cup of Tea.

Enjoy the photo session ……………

hesco 1

hesco2

hesco4

hesco5

hexsco3

 

hesco amar ujala
Page Number 10 Good Choice

DMSRDE, Kanpur – LDCE Result

In DRDO the HR policy is depending upon Lab Director’s wish, DRDO labs conducted Limited Department Competitive Examination (LDCE) every year. Each labs conducting this with directors wish like in IRDE they conducts as per their union leader’s desire anyone who belongs to certain union member can appear as well cleared without any hitch, no one in administration have dare to challenge his/ her certificate / diploma/ degree which he/ she possess is from valid recognized institute or it is from any tom dick harry institute.

The Lab DEAL which is nearly 2.5 kM away from IRDE conducting Limited Department Competitive Examination (LDCE) with different rules. DEAL is not allowing such certificate / diploma/ degree, which IRDE accepting for their employees. The DEAL earlier accepted such certificate / diploma/ degree for their beloved ones but now they totally banned. Now employees are fighting these issues in courts.

In DRDO almost nearly more than 2000 employees working on the basis of unrecognized/ illegally arranged certificate / diploma/ degree.

Same story is repeated by other labs, recently on 29th October 2014 DMSRDE also conducted Limited Department Competitive Examination (LDCE) and Director as per his reputation encouraged such unrecognized/ illegally arranged certificate / diploma/ degree and as per sources that one candidate who possess diploma from Rajasthan Vidyapeeth not only allowed for LDCE but selected also without verifying his diploma, Dr A K Singh, DOP already send a letter ( DOP/01/03500/Lumpsump/M/01 dated 11 March 2014) to all Labs and establishment that certificate / diploma/ degree should be verified properly.

The case of Amit Chawla, STA, LASTEC is still not cleared by administration.

Dr A K Saxena, please before declaring  the result verify the authenticity of   certificate / diploma/ degree as per Dr A K Singh, DOP’s letter otherwise DMSRDE employees can be challenge the result  of LDCE in court.

Question No 1 – Whether Individual  took permission for perusing diploma from Rajasthan Vidyapeet.

Question No. 2 Whether administration of DMSRDE checked the fee receipt of all six semesters.

Question No 4 Whether he was taken leave for examination for six semester exam dates.

Question No 5. whether examination center is recognized by AICTE/UGC etc

 

आज नहीं तो कल फसेगा तो इससे तो अछा है की जो नौकरी ईमानदारी से चल रही है उसी में खुस रहो क्यों इन भ्रष्ट लोगो के चक्कर में पद कर ज़िन्दगी क्यों ख़राब करते हो I बाकि तुम्हारी मर्जी – Das Bhai

Jai Hind

fake-degree-dop-letter

fake-degree-dop-letter-page2

Army Tramples on Faulty DRDO Study on Siachen Deployment

By Pradip R Sagar
Published: 02nd Nov 2014 06:06:55 AM The New Indian Express – The Sunday Standard

Vigilant Indian soldier - Siachen
Vigilant Indian soldier – Siachen

NEW DELHI: Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s surprise visit this Diwali to the world’s highest battlefield, Siachen, to applaud the Indian army troops deployed there again brought into national focus the difficulty of operating under such adverse climatic conditions.

A study by Defence Research and Development Organisation, India’s premier defence research institute, to find solutions and shorten the acclimatization period has been junked by the Army.

Keeping unforeseen events in mind, the Army wanted to reduce the pre-acclimatisation training period to faster deploy its troops to high-altitude locations in cases of emergency. And for this, the DRDO was mandated to carry out a study on how to reduce the pre-acclimatisation training period in May 2009 with budget of over `3 crore. Delhi-based Defence Institute of Physiology and Allied Sciences (DIPAS), a wing of DRDO, carried out the study for which they selected 210 soldiers. In order to study the soldiers’ physiology changes, they were asked to stay in a make-shift chamber filled with nitrogen for intermittent periods. But the Army has rubbished the study report and criticised the methods adopted by the DIPAS scientists.

In a strongly worded four-page letter to DIPAS on 10 September, the office of the Director General Armed Forces Medical Services (DGAFMS) has raised serious objections and sought explanation on various key points related to the study including selection of troops for the study, use of multiple investigators to collect data, use of master step test as an indicator of exercise performance for high altitude and disparity in heart rate date from the same cohort at different points of the report.

DIPAS had used intermittent hypoxia study at sea level before dispatching soldiers to high-altitude locations. Explaining the terminology, a DRDO scientist said that Intermittent Hypoxic Training (IHT) is a test protocol usually given to the individual with reduced oxygen concentration as prevailed in high altitude for pre-acclimatising them at sea level in a normobaric hypoxic chamber, before they are deployed for high mountain warfare.

On the basis the outcome of the study, two costly normobaric hypoxic chambers were planned to be set up in Chandigarh to cater northern command and Sukhna for eastern command troops with a cost of over `10 lakh.

Reacting strongly to the samples of troops taken, that had men who had already served in high-altitude postings, the DGAFMS raised concerns on the validity of conclusions drawn from the data presented. While seeking justification for the selection of re-inductees as study subjects, the Army has said, “Current knowledge on the phenomenon of de-acclimatisation is limited. It is accepted by many experts in the field that certain physiological changes induces on exposure on high altitude may persist beyond one month of return to sea level.”

“Hence the choice of re-inductees as study subjects raises questions about the validity of date being presented, especially since the aim of the project is to extrapolate the findings to healthy soldiers being rapidly inducted to high altitude, in all probability, for the first time,” DGAFMC said in his detailed response to DIPAS study.

When contacted, DRDO spokesperson Ravi Gupta refused to comment as it is a classified matter.

RTI-PMO- Sh Avinash Chander, DG, DRDO, Secretary, DRD, SA to RM

To                                                                       2nd November 2014
Shri Syed Ekram Rizwi,
CPIO, PMO,
South Block,
New Delhi – 110011

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of Rule 4 of CCS(Conducts) Rules 1964 – “Employment of near relatives of Govt. servants in companies or firms”, GOI [MHA OM No. 25/43/55-Ests.(A), dated 19.01.1956] – “ Propriety of sons and near relatives of Class I (now Group A) officers seeking employment in private firms which enjoy Government patronage” and GOI [MHA OM No. 24/43/56-Ests.(A), dated 26.05.1957] – Awarding of contract to a firm in which son/daughter/dependent of an officer is employed.

Shri Avinash Chander is holding the post of Secretary, DRD since 31 May 2013.
PMO is custodian of information related to Secretary of all Ministries/Department.
kindly provide following information under Section 6(1) of RTI Act.

1. Whether son/daughter/wife of Shri Avinash Chander is proprietor, partner, shareholder or employee of the any company, firm or business group that deals with any procurement /supply /fabrication/business/contracts related activity in any Establishment/Unit/Lab of DRDO. (Yes/No)
2. If answer to point(1) is Yes then provide the following details:
i. Relation with family member (son/daughter/wife)
ii. Name & address of family member/dependent
iii. Name of Company/Firm/Business Group with address
iv. Relation with Company/Firm – Proprietor /Partner /Shareholder or Employee
v. Stake in Company/Firm of the family member in case partner or shareholder
3. If answer to point(1) is Yes then provide the following details regarding contracts awarded/Supply Orders issued by DRDO to that company/firm during the years 2010 -2014
i. Total cost of contracts awarded/supply orders issued to that company/firm
ii. Total number of contracts awarded/supply order issued to that company/firm
4. If answer to point(1) is Yes then whether Shri Avinash Chander declared the facts and desist himself from the dealing of the case while award of contract/supply order or exercise patronage in favour of the company/firm as required under Rules 4 of CCS(Conducts) Rule 1964. (Yes/No)
5. If answer to point (4) is Yes then provide the copies of declarations submitted by Shri Avinash Chander to DRDO/MOD/Government of India
6. .Whether Shri Avinash Chander intimated to Government under provisions of Rule 4 of CCS (Conducts) Rules, 1964 regarding acceptance of employment of his son/daughter/dependent in the company/firm that has official dealing with DRDO. (Yes/No)
7. If answer to point (6) is Yes then provide copy of intimation regarding acceptance of employment by son/daughter/dependent under the provisions of Rule 4 of CCS (Conducts) Rules, 1964.

Regards
Prabhu Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur,
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com website www.corruptionindrdo.com

Registration Number PMOIN/R/2014/61523

Sh Avinash Chander is not interested to take any action on DMSRDE corruption cases

To                                                                                                        1st  November 2014
Hon’ble
Shri Arun Jaitly,
Raksha Mantri,
Room No 104, South Block,
New Delhi-110011

 

SUBJECT:  Sh Avinash Chander is not interested to take any action on DMSRDE corruption cases.

Sir,

I would like to draw your kind attention towards corruption in tunes of crores at Defence Materials & Stores Research & Development Establishment (DMSRDE), Kanpur, an establishment under Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO), Ministry of Defence, Government of India.

Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena was appointed as Scientist ‘C’ on 28.04.1984 in DMSRDE, Kanpur and since then he is continuously posted at DMSRDE, Kanpur since last 30 years. He has not been transferred even for a day from Kanpur and since the date of his posting he is working at Kanpur.  The roots of the Dr. Saxena while working at DMSRDE, Kanpur has become so deep that he was involved in various activities involving the financial & other administrative irregularities.

Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena, Scientist ‘G’ was appointed as Director, DMSRDE, Kanpur wef 01 January 2011. In spite of the fact that he has been involved in various financial and administrative irregularities , Dr. Saxena was  promoted to the rank of Scientist ‘H’ wef 02 August 2012 and since then he is  holding the rank of Scientist ‘H’ and working as Director, DMSRDE.

The right from his appointment as Director, he was involved in various kinds of administrative & financial irregularities that lead corruption in tunes of crores. Several complaints were made against Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena to then Defence Minister by some scientists of DMSRDE.

Being a RTI activist and social worker running a website corruptionindrdo.com to expose the corruption in DRDO, also made as far as 12 complaints regarding corruption in procurements of various instruments & materials etc in DMSRDE by Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena, Director, DMSRDE to CVC, Hon’ble Defence Minister and DGR&D, DRDO. These complaints were filed during 29 Nov 2013 to 11 June 2014. Total cost of store items procured against which complaints were filed is about Rs. 7.5 crore. A complete list of complaints filed by me to CVC and Hon’ble Defence Minister is annexed as Annexure No. -1.

All the aforesaid complaints made have been endorsed by Central Vigilance Commission (CVC). CVC has taken cognizance of aforesaid complaints and registered on prima facia.  These complaints have been forwarded to Chief Vigilance Office (CVO), Ministry of Defence for further enquiry/investigation of the aforesaid complaints. Under the provisions of RTI Act 2005 the CPIO, CVC vide letter no. CVC/RTI/13/1862/241925 dated 18.03.2014 informed to me that his complaints have been forwarded to CVO (MOD) for investigation.

Under RTI Act, CPIO, CVO MOD informed that all complaints have been forwarded to Director, Vigilance & Security, DRDO for further inquiry and asked the consolidated report from DRDO vide their letter dated 04 August 2014.

Meantime, A FFIC was constituted by Shri Avinash Chander, DG, DRDO to inquire the complaints against Dr. Saxena. The Fact Finding Inquiry Committee visited DMSRDE, Kanpur on 13th – 14th, March 2014 for inquiry on the complaint submitted against Dr. Saxena. The said committee submitted its report to Shri Avinash Chander but no action taken by DRDO against Dr. Saxena, Director.

It is very surprising and interesting that Shri Avinash Chander again set up another four members Fact Finding Inquiry Committee  under chairmanship of Dr. D.C. Pandey, Scientist ‘H’ LRDE and three members Sri Hari Babu Srivastava, Scientist ‘G’, Director, LASTECH, Sri Jagdeep, Scientist ‘F’ and Sri R.S. Mehta, Joint Director. The said committee visited DMSRDE, Kanpur recently on 9-10 July 2014. Therefore constitution of two FFIC by Shri Avinash Chander establishes that there were complaints against Dr. Saxena but to give him patronage and support the Shri Avinash Chander set up illegal FFIC. This second FFIC also submitted its report to Shri Avinash Chander but still no action against Dr. A.K Saxena took place by DRDO.

Interestingly, 31st October in the eve of Vigilance week, Sh. R.S. Mehta, Joint Director, Vigilance, DRDO in his address mentioned to audience that how the corrupt practices adopted by Director, DMSRDE and his team in procurement cases.

Sir, it is not understandable that why Shri Avinash Chander constituted two fact finding committees? Why DRDO is silent on corruption cases of DMSRDE, Kanpur? Why Shri Avinash Chander is protecting Dr. A.K. Saxena?

In light of the above mentioned facts, it is requested that speedy action needed to save precious funds of poor tax payers. Dr A K Saxena openly using same corrupt practices in ongoing procurements cases. He told to his beloved team that Dr. V Bhujanga Rao, DG,NS&IC directed that left Rs 13 crores should be spend up to 31st March 2015 positively.

Regards
 
Prabhu  Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun
Ph   0135 2787750, Mobile 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website   www.corruptionindrdo.com

Annexure:-

  1. List of complaints/cases filed to CVC and Defence Minister against Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena, Director, DMSRDE, Kanpur

    DMSRDE CVC Cases
    DMSRDE CVC Cases

Why do people want to go private organizations? Is it because they do good work and they are rewarded? Do you have any method of incentives for good work done by scientists? Please elaborate – (CC R&D HR)

As per the reply in Parliament ( LOK SABHA) against UNSTARRED QUESTION NO 596, ANSWERED ON 09.12.2013, the total 487 scientists left from DRDO from 2008 to 30th November 2013. Scientist B- 289, Scientist C- 152, Scientist D – 26, Scientist E-  13, Scientist F – 7.

Why they left – Financial reasons – very few, most young scientists join this great premier scientific organization with great enthusiasm that they will contribute their best to serve the nation, but unfortunately they encounter incompetent, greedy, bosses who got these higher posts on the basis of flattering/corruption /nepotism.

Examples are numerous but this is one real reason I grew up in a small town called ———— and my father works for ——. All my childhood I spent in scientific community and I dreamt of becoming a scientist one day. I did that and I ignored offers from private sector and Joined DRDO.

The establishment that I joined promised me excellent work in my field of analysis and designing. At 21, I joined and things of course were very indifferent to what I dreamt of.

We had bureaucracy and people were not happy. The organization was something like a hierarchy controlled rather than intellectual oriented. I had an excellent team and my STA’s are one of the best. People never cared to harness their potential. Have no idea why.

Most of the works that we were supposed to do were outsourced; this is one thing that I fought with everybody. I did not want to work for my salary; I wanted to work for pleasure.

Finally, my team was able to deliver some engineering marvels that my superiors said it was impossible to do. My growing frustration with outsourcing was a big issue for me. A single step ahead in the project is like fighting with in.

After 5 years of service, I came to US to pursue my further studies.”

The absolute power to Lab Directors is also a big reason to derail the organizations.

The training of young scientist started with collecting quotations, making specifications, filing indents of not required instruments & items on direction of their bosses to get good APAR and promotions. If the scientist not compromise with his integrity for helping out the corruption of his bosses and Director, then immediately his harassment started by all means including transfers.

One scientist from GTRE, Bangalore genuinely approached the Director for his transfer but the egoist Director after receiving transfer order from DRDO Hqrs told him “ I will see who is going to relieve you if you pressurized me. Your dead body only can only be relieved” It is not a joke and this is the real scenario of DRDO.

The individual  ask transfer without having GOD father in DRDO always get same treatment, his carrier start spoiling by Lab Directors, if Lab Directors is annoyed with any individual of lab means he will going to face social boycott by  whole lab because one try to help him means he will also come under threat zone. Targeted individual start facing each and every step of his day to day work like NO TD, No support for project work, no recommendation for good work, APAR/ACR dropped to average and many more obstacles are common.

If Lab Director sniff that the individual is watching corruption or raising voice for that, it means that that individual is now going to get a kick without following the rules to remotest area with instruction that make sure that this man does not get peace at all.

DRDO has an unwritten thumb rule that when any Lab Director is not happy with any individual it means that he must be transferred to other destination without justifying the reason and the best part of this is that entire DRDO HQRS backsthat egoist corrupt director. This has resulted in the DRDO we know today.

All 25 questions raised by the Cabinet/PMO / Parliament Committee are really the honest approach to make DRDO a productive organization. DRDO is wasting more than two lakh crores worth of infrastructure without any mentionable output. DRDO should accept Genral Mallik’s comment after KARGIL WARcasualties in the conflict could have been reduced had the Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO) not come in the way.

Unfortunately, DRDO still does not understand the importance of the country’s needs. It still wastes money on SDR type of technologies, which already exist, and DRDO is ready to give second extension for PDC, like Sh R C Agarwal, who got a second extension without output.

It is requested DRDO Hqrs now Modi Ji giving full opportunity to save and grow DRDO in real means, अब तो जागो औरभ्रष्टाचार, भाई भतीजावाद, अयोग्य लोगो को आगे बढ़ाने का कार्य बंद करो।  देश के विकास की और देखो।  जय हिन्द 

DR Gausal Khan’s, DIPAS representation also throws light of DRDO culture please go through the following pages.

Page - 1
Page – 1
Page - 2
Page – 2
Page -3
Page -3

RTI – Cabinet- Shri Avinash Chander’s service extension

To                                                                                                   Date 30th October 2014
Shri Rajesh Nagpal,
Under Secretary, 
Central Public Information Officer,
ACC Cell, Cabinet Secretariat,
Sardar Patel Bhawan,
New Delhi – 110004

 

Hello,

Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005 in respect of DOPT OM No.  No. 26012/6/2002-Estt. (A) dated 9th December, 2002, No. 26012/8/2011-Estt. (A) dated 16th May, 2011, 26012/15/2010-Estt(A-IV) dated 4th May 2011 [DPRC] , 26012/15/2010-Estt(A-IV) dated 4th May 2011 [Screening Committee]and F.No.22/35/2011-E0 (SM.II) dated 24/26 September, 2014.

Shri Avinash Chander , Distinguished Scientist ,DRDO , Min. of Defence was given extension beyond after his superannuation from age of 62 -64 years with effect from 01 Dec 2012 to 30 Nov 2014 by approval of DPRC of DRDO, Screening Committee headed by Cabinet Secretary and Appointments Committee of the Cabinet.

Under the provisions of FR 56(d) the scientist considered for extension from age of 62-64 years should have “International Stature“. Copy of DOPT OM dt 16 May 2011 is enclosed.

  1. Provide copy of Minute Sheet & File Noting for extension in service of Shri Avinash Chander, for age of 62-64 years by the Appointments Committee of the Cabinet.
  2. The copy of bio-data of Shri Avinash Chander in prescribed Performa submitted to DPRC, Screening Committee and ACC.(Proforma for sending proposals for approval of Department of Personnel & Training for grant of extension to Government servants beyond the age of superannuation)
  3. The attributes, achievements and documentary evidenceson record of Shri Avinash Chander based on which DPRC, Screening Committee & ACC considered Shri Avinash Chander a Scientist with “International Stature” and approved his extension.
  4. The DPRCs justification for such extension based on merits of the case, the international stature of the person recommended and also indicate whether thiswill block promotion opportunities of others in the Department.
Regards
Prabhu  Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun
Ph   0135 2787750, Mobile 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website   www.corruptionindrdo.com

Registration Number           CABST/R/2014/60418

भारतीय मुसलमान देश के लिए जिएगा और देश के लिए ही मरेगा: प्रधानमंत्री नरेंद्र मोदी

माननीय श्री नरेंद्र मोदी जी                                                                  दिनाक 29 अक्टूबर  2014
प्रधानमंत्री
कक्षसंख्या  152 पीएमओ
साउथ ब्लाक  नईदिल्ली -110011
 

विषय : डीआरडीओ के वैज्ञानिक डा. गोसाल खान  के साथ भेद भाव पूर्ण कार्यवाही के सन्दर्भ में

माननीय श्री प्रधानमंत्री जी  आपने देश को एक महत्वपूर्ण सन्देश दिया भारतीय मुसलमान देश के लिए जिएगा और देश के लिए ही मरेगा यह सन्देश डीआरडीओ के कुछ  मठाधीशो को समझ नहीं आया और वो लोग अपनें अहम के खातिर किसी भी शख्स का उत्पीड़न करने से बाज नहीं आ रहे है।  वैसे तो इन सब उत्पीड़न कार्यो की बहुत  लम्बी लाइन है जो की आपको डीआरडीओ में चल रहे कोर्ट केसो की संख्या देखते ही पता चल जाएगी परन्तु डा. गोसाल खान  का मामला सीधे सीधे आपके सन्देश की डीआरडीओ द्वारा अवेहलना है। 

डा. गोसाल खान  पश्चिम बंगाल के छोटे से गांव के रहने वाले हैं और अपनी योग्यता व् लगनशीलता के कारण कोलकत्ता से उच्च शिक्षा ग्रहण की व् अमेरिका में रिसर्च करने चले गए परन्तु देश से लगाव  के कारण सात वर्षो पश्च्यात डीआरडीओ वरिष्ठ वैज्ञानिक के पद ग्रहण कर लिया। अमेरिका में रहते हुए उनकी दो पुत्रियों का जन्म हुआ और व् स्वत ही अमेरिका की नागरिक बन गयी। और  डा. गोसाल खान कभी भी अमेरिका में बस सकते हैं  पर इन सब बातो के बाउजूद डा. गोसाल खान डीआरडीओ में मेहनत से अपने रिसर्च में लगे रहे व् कई रिसर्च पेपर पब्लिश करे, कई अवार्ड्स प्राप्त करे व् नयी पीढ़ी के योग्य पात्रो को पी एच डी करा रहे है।

डा. गोसाल खान  द्वारा लिखे एक रिसर्च पेपर को जापान की एक संस्था ने “Developing World Scientist Award” के लिए चयनित किया तो उनके निदेशक महोदया डा. शशिबाला सिंह  ने अनपेक्षित कारणों डा. गोसाल खान विरुद्ध मोर्चा खोल दिया और अंतत अपने भ्राता श्री ए के सिंह (निदेशक कार्मिक) की मदद से उन्हें एक न्यायविस्र्द्ध चार्ज शीट दे दी गयी।

डा. शशिबाला सिंह व् श्री ए के सिंह  का यह कृत्य श्री अविनाश चन्दर, वैज्ञानिक सलाहकार  की छत्र छाया में देश हित की अनदेखी,  जापान में देश की छवि दूषित करने का  प्रयास है।

रही बात डा. गोसाल खान  की उनको इस उत्पीड़न ने  लाइफ साइंस वैज्ञानिक से कानून का विद्यार्थी बनने में मजबूर कर दिया।

डा. गोसाल खान ने अपने उत्पीड़न के सन्दर्भ में  अल्प संख्यक आयोग को भी पत्र लिखा पर डीआरडीओ के दिग्गजों ने एक असंवैधानिक समिति (समिति में कोई भी अल्प संख्यक सदस्य नहीं था)  का गठन कर उलटे डा. गोसाल खान  के विरुद्ध विभागीय कार्यवाही की संस्तुति कर दी।

माननीय श्री प्रधानमंत्री जी आपको जानकार हैरानी होगी पिछले कुछ सालो में डीआरडीओ के वैज्ञानिक, तकनीकी अधिकारी, कर्मचारियों  ने  इतने संख्या में  कोर्ट केस करे जितने की  डीआरडीओ ने आज तक प्रोजेक्ट नहीं करे होंगे।  डीआरडीओ पिछले दस सालो  में कोर्ट केसो में खर्च किये कुल रूपये से एक देश को नया प्रोडक्ट मिल सकता था।

ये सब  वैज्ञानिको को प्रशासनिक कार्यो में नियुक्त करना है जब वैज्ञानिक विज्ञानं छोड़ प्रशासनिक कार्यो करने लगता है तो वह सत्ता शक्ति का शिकार होकर इस प्रकार के उत्पीड़न कार्य करता है और पूरा संस्थान अपने लक्ष्य से भटक जाता है।

अतः आपसे अनुरोध है कि डा. गोसाल खान को भारत में रहने के लिए आपके अविलंब हस्तक्षेप की आवश्यकता है। अन्यथा डीआरडीओ के सिंह  बंधू जोकि  श्री अविनाश चन्दर, वैज्ञानिक सलाहकार के  वरद हस्त से रक्षित है  डा. गोसाल खान को इतना प्रताड़ित करेंगे की डा.खान को वापस अमेरिका भागना पड़ेगा। अभी तो सिर्फ अपनी सैलरी से हज़ारो रूपए खर्च कर कोर्ट के चकर काट रहे है और विज्ञानं छोड़ कानून की किताब पड़ रहे है। पर कब तक ?

धन्यवाद

 

प्रभु डंडरियाल
21-सुंदरवालारायपुरदेहरादून
फ़ोन  0135- 2787750, मोबाइल – 9411114879,
e-मेल  id prabhudoon@gmail.com  वेबसाइट  www.corruptionindrdo.com
 
dr khandr khan1dr khan2

एरीज के पूर्व निदेशक समेत दो को भेजा जेल

नैनीताल स्थित आर्यभट्ट प्रेक्षण विज्ञान शोध संस्थान में 2008 में हुए इंजीनियर भर्ती घोटाले का मामला

संवाद सहयोगी, देहरादून: नैनीताल स्थित आर्यभट्ट प्रेक्षण विज्ञान शोध संस्थान(एरीज) में वर्ष 2008 में हुए इंजीनियर भर्ती घोटाले के आरोपी संस्थान के पूर्व निदेशक राम सागर ने मंगलवार को सीबीआइ के विशेष न्यायाधीश अमित सिरोही की अदालत में आत्मसमर्पण कर दिया। उनके साथ एक अन्य आरोपी टॉर स्टील रिसर्च इंस्टीट्यूट ऑफ इंडिया दिल्ली के मुख्य सलाहकार अभियंता (चीफ कंसल्टिंग इंजीनियर) एएल संधल ने भी अदालत में समर्पण किया। अदालत ने दोनों को 14 दिन की न्यायिक अभिरक्षा में जेल भेज दिया। घोटाले में कुल पांच आरोपी हैं।

वर्ष 2008 में संस्थान की ओर से इंजीनियर ‘बी’ के पदों पर भर्ती के लिए विज्ञापन निकाले गए थे। इन पदों पर कुल 23 अभ्यर्थियों ने आवेदन किया था। संस्थान इंजीनियर ‘बी’ पदों पर तो कोई चयन नहीं किया, अलबत्ता इंजीनियर ‘सी’ पद पर एक भर्ती कर दी। इस भर्ती में उन पर भाई-भतीजावाद का आरोप लगाते हुए नैनीताल निवासी डीएन भट्ट व अल्मोड़ा निवासी नीरज नयाल ने हाई कोर्ट में जनहित याचिका दायर की।

इस पर अदालत ने पहले केंद्रीय सतर्कता आयोग को जांच के आदेश दिए। बाद में आयोग की जांच से असंतुष्ट हो मामला सीबीआइ को सौंप दिया। मामला सामने आने पर रामसागर निदेशक पद से हटा दिया गया। सीबीआइ ने नौ मई 2013 को न्यायालय में संस्थान के निदेशक राम सागर निवासी 0610, प्रथम ई-क्रास रोड कोरामंगलम बैंगलूरू और टॉर स्टील रिसर्च इंस्टीट्यूट ऑफ इंडिया के अभियंता एएल संधल निवासी मकान नंबर 01, हौज खास नई दिल्ली समेत पांच आरोपियों के खिलाफ अदालत में आरोप पत्र दाखिल किया। तब से आरोपियों को पेश होने के लिए नोटिस दर नोटिस भेजे जा रहे थे। इसी बीच रामसागर व एएल संधल ने न्यायालय में आत्म समर्पण कर जमानत की अर्जी लगाई। मंगलवार को अदालत ने जमानत अर्जी खारिज कर दी।danik jagran 29 October 2014