Policy bankruptcy in DRDO – hype to create artificial crisis

डीआरडीओ में नीति का दिवालियापन – कृत्रिम संकट पैदा करने के लिए प्रचार
To                                                                                                                                 28th May 2014
Sh. Narendra Modi,
Prime Minister,
Room No – 152, PMO,
South Block, NEW DELHI -110011

With 64 Crores annual budget in 1980, when Dr. V S Arunachalam took over as Scientific Adviser, the budget allocation enhanced to 1100 crores with missions made to develop missiles under IGMDP program.

That was the beginning of infrastructure development and deteriorating of scientific research and development. By March every year i.e. the closer of financial year, everyone from Scientist ’B’ to SA to RM office were looking for procurement cases only and those who met the expenditure by any means were rewarded with scientist of the year award.

However the conscious financial officers use to raise objections, so special provisions were made and duly approved by ministry. SA to RM was given special powers to procure under single quotation more than Rs. 10 lakh where procurement committee could be bypassed. This decision was taken to facilitate the speedy development of technology for missiles.

The incumbent after Kalam, further modified the single tender purchase and the SA office granted permission for procurement of one lakh rupees only.

The cases were raised left and right on single tender procurements, where hefty sums were returned to indenter as kickback. This procedure became a culture of DRDO and when in 2006 DRDO Purchase Manual was introduce and policy was framed, Directors powers were raised to 50 Lakhs rupees with Hqrs. rep in crores and SA’s power raised up to 50 crores.

When previous Defence Minister Sh. A K Antony noticed the foul smell, he ordered CGDA for special audit of DRDO. CGDA found that DRDO Directors including Scientific Adviser misused the funds by splitting procurement orders within their limit of sanction power. They fooled the country in all possible ways. A well known fact is that 70% of DRDO requirements come from foreign countries; it means that DRDO is wasting precious foreign currency which is hard earned by the country.

DRDO procured, in last 10 years, thousands of crores of rupees equipments and these equipments are lying idle in various Lab premises and waiting for their departure to the scrap house.

With the passage of time DRDO has become a dumping ground of obsolete technology and a way to needlessly waste the poor tax payers’ money without any end result.

Honorable Prime Minister is requested to overhaul the DRDO structure totally and take strong actions to implement Accountability.

With warm regards

Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008
Phone – 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
E-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com, Website – www.corruptionindrdo.com

लैब की जगह लाइब्रेरी-स्टोर संभाल रहे वैज्ञानिक

दैनिक जागरण मई 29, 2014

जागरण संवाददाता, देहरादून: जब भी रक्षा अनुसंधान की बात आती है तो देश की निगाहें अमेरिका, इजराइल व रूस जैसे देशों पर टिक जाती हैं। हम अकसर रोना रोते हैं कि हमारे पास वैज्ञानिकों की कमी है, जिस वजह से शोध कार्यो को गति नहीं मिल पाती। लेकिन, दूसरी तरफ खुद डिफेंस रिसर्च एंड डेवलपमेंट ऑर्गेनाइजेशन (डीआरडीओ) के रेकार्ड बताते हैं कि देशभर के उनके 52 संस्थानों में वैज्ञानिकों को शोध कार्यो की जगह स्टोर, प्रशासन व लाइब्रेरी जैसी जिम्मेदारी दी जा रही है। देहरादून स्थित डिफेंस इलेक्ट्रॉनिक्स एप्लिकेशन लैबोरेटरी (डील) व इंस्ट्रूमेंट्स रिसर्च एंड डेवलपमेंट इस्टेब्लिशमेंट (आइआरडीई) समेत देशभर के रक्षा अनुसंधान संस्थानों में औसतन 15 फीसद वैज्ञानिक शोध की जगह दूसरे कामों में लगे हैं।

इस बात का खुलासा ‘करप्शन इन डीआरडीओ डॉट कॉम’ के संचालक प्रभु डंडरियाल की ओर से आरटीआइ में मांगी गई जानकारी में हुआ। दस्तावेज बताते हैं कि डील व आइआरडीई में करीब 20 फीसद वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान की जगह अन्य कार्य कर रहे हैं। बता दें कि शोध कार्यो को बढ़ावा देने के लिए वैज्ञानिकों को अन्य पदों की तुलना में विशेष रियायत व सुविधाएं दी जाती हैं। वैज्ञानिकों को पद न होने पर भी ‘फ्लेक्सिबल कॉम्प्लिमेंटरी स्कीम’ के तहत निरंतर पदोन्नति दी जाती है। यही नहीं नॉलेज बढ़ाने के लिए विभिन्न वैज्ञानिक जर्नल व पुस्तकें खरीदने व इंटरनेट प्रयोग के लिए विशेष बजट मुहैया कराया जाता है। इसके अलावा कार्मिक व प्रशिक्षण विभाग (डीओपीटी) की गाइडलाइन साफ कहती है कि इस तरह विशेष प्रकृति के पदों की सेवाएं अन्य जगह नहीं दी जा सकती हैं। वैज्ञानिक संस्थानों में प्रशासनिक पदों के लिए संघ लोक सेवा आयोग (यूपीएससी) के माध्यम से भर्ती कराए जाने का प्रावधान है। बावजूद इसके डीआरडीओ में तमाम नियम व शोध कायरें की अहमियत को दरकिनार कर वैज्ञनिकों को प्रशासनिक कार्यो में उलझाया जा रहा है।

Ø  वैज्ञानिकों की कमी रोना रोने वाले डीआरडीओ के संस्थानों में शोध की जगह दूसरे कामों में झोंके जा रहे वैज्ञानिक

Ø  कार्मिक व प्रशिक्षण विभाग की गाइडलाइन को दरकिनार कर हर प्रयोगशाला में औसतन 15 फीसद वैज्ञानिक संभाले हैं लाइब्रेरी, स्टोरी व प्रशासन जैसे पद

Ø  दून के आइआरडीई व डील जैसे संस्थान भी अछूते नहींdanik jagran 29 may2

danik jagran 29 may1

 

danik jagran 29 may

There can be no promotion during the period of such extension – DoPT

To                                                                                                               28 May 2014
Sh Subandhu Basu,
US (SM-I), CPIO,
Room no. 23, North Block,
New Delh -110001

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of Recent Supreme Court Judgment dated 9 January 2014 on CIVIL APPEAL NO. 192 of 2014

Major General H.M. Singh, VSM- Appellant
Versus
Union of India and Anr.- Respondents

The proceedings recorded by the Appointments Committee of the Cabinet while rejecting the appellants claim for promotion to the rank of Lieutenant General are also being set out below:

Point No 8. The orders issued by the Department of Personnel and Training lay down that while extension could be granted in exceptional circumstances, there can be no promotion during the period of such extension. These orders apply to the civilian establishment. The instructions which apply to the Defence forces permit extension in service only if the exigencies so demand. DRDO is mainly civilian, and the Rules, as mentioned above, do not permit promotion on extension.

  1. Please provide the copy orders of Department of Personnel and Training rules related to extension of civilian establishment beyond the service of 60 years
  2. Please provide the orders of Department of Personnel and Training rules related to extension of civilian establishment beyond the service of 62 years
  3. Please provide the copy of above mentioned issued orders of Department of Personnel and Training rules related to extension “there can be no promotion during the period of such extension.”

Regards

Prabhu  Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur,
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website www.corruptionindrdo.com

Registration Number     DOP&T/R/2014/62037

After First Extension, Second Extension than Contract without output please spare the country

To                                                                                                                                 27th may 2014
Sh. Narendra Modi
Prime Minister
Room No – 152, PMO,
South Block, NEW DELHI -110011

Subject:  The Appointment Committee of the Cabinet appointed Sh. Avinash Chander on contract basis.

With the passage of time the dignity of the office of Scientific Adviser to RM has taken a nose dive. Initially the organization (DRDO) was headed by eminent scholars and internationally recognized faces like Dr. D S Kothari, Dr. S Bhagavantam, Dr. B D Nagchaudhuri, Prof. M G K  Menon, Dr. Raja Ramanna and Dr. V S Arunachalam  whose scientific contribution were know across the globe.

Unfortunately when the honorary post of the Scientific Adviser to RM was converted to DG, DRDO and Secretary DRD, the takers of the plum post were apolitical. The search committee used to recommend a person with established credentials as the individual would lead 30000 strong scientific/technical workforces and was supposed to deliver products for three defence forces.

The KARGIL War however exposed the credit of DRDO as countrymen were ditched. The justification of successive failures was given as the non-availability of imported critical systems/subsystems, components, etc.

Later, the top offices gave a new theory of system integration instead of developing indigenous systems/subsystems as import substitutes. The successive government was not in a position to analyze properly the role of DRDO and the fallout was that a vacuum was created in the chain of command.

As far as the expenditure is concerned, the office of Scientific Adviser’s focus shifted to infrastructure development (primarily acquiring land, expansion of building and dumping of equipment) instead of research and development of systems.

DRDO consumes Rs. 10000 crores annually.

The scientific community down the channel are preparing justification for annual expenditure and in the absence of ACCOUNTABILITY they simply burry the product in the name of technology demonstration with obsolete technology imported from elsewhere.

When Dr. V K Saraswat, Ex-SA to RM was due to retire after successive extensions. The search committee was ignorant to the requirement of SA to RM’s office and new incumbent Sh. Avinash Chander was selected by ACC out of the 12 officers without having any credential to their account even on national level.

The information revealed under RTI is enclosed for your ready reference.

Honorable Sir, after sixty six years of independence, for first time people of India have given such a great and unprecedented mandate based on your commitment, patriotism and providing avenues for betterment of the country.

The previous government, even after being in office for two successive terms, had failed to implement ACCOUNTABILITY in DRDO. DRDO with passage of time has reduced to a mere organization where the workforce is provided hefty salaries as social commitments.

We hope that DRDO will overhaul thoroughly and with ACCOUNTABILITY enforced, turn into a productive organization.

Currently, DRDO has a large number of scientists in service extensions 60 to 62 and 62 to 64 and the astonishing fact is that maximum are involved in non-scientific activities.

Early address to this “extension business” and “Contract Business” will help to curb the neck deep corruption in DRDO.

It is really strange that in 125 crore families, we have not been able to find the right eligible person and have ended up relying upon contract culture.

With warm regards

Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008
Phone – 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
E-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com, Website – www.corruptionindrdo.com

 

Enclosed

  1. Copy of RTI reply from CPIO, Cabinet Secretariatavanash chander recuirtment details avanash chander recuirtment details1 avanash chander recuirtment details2

DRDO trying to manage counter the Ex-Defence Minister Sh. A K Antony’s recommendation to scrap RAC with help of ASCI

Ex-Defence Minister Sh. A K Antony recommended reconsideration of DRDO recruitment of scientists again from UPSC channel instead of DRDO’s own Recruitment Assessment Centre (RAC). From 1984 on wards RAC independently recruited scientists as or when required by DRDO. The RAC is managed by DRDO scientists who were under control of DRDO top brasses directly.

CVO, MOD analyzed after receiving several complaints against DRDO top brasses that there were a lot of manipulations done in laid down recruitment rules by RAC & senior DRDO officials to recruit their  wards. CVO, MOD proposed CBI enquiries against 10 top DRDO scientists who were involved in such criminal conspiracy. CVO, MOD also suggested that RAC be scrapped and scientists’ recruitment should be done through UPSC again. For this it was suggested that a study is conducted that would evaluate the RAC functionality by XLRI, ASCI Hyderabad, etc.

As DRDO has several experts bluff masters who have already proven their expertise by fooling the nation in different important projects, few are delayed by several years and few are closed unceremoniously.

So again they came forward to counter CVO, MOD suggestion and gave HR audit to Administrative Staff College of India (ASCI), Hyderabad. ASCI introduced just one program in DRDO in 2006-07. Today, in 2014, ASCI is running several programs in the name of risk management, basic project management and a lot of other gimmicks in ITM-Mussoorie, DIPAS-Delhi, DRDL, ANURAG and so on. It is essentially a give and take game with no scope for improvement or benefits of DRDO or the officials. This can be seen from HR Audit of DRDO: A Pilot Study, a feedback format by ASCI, Hyderabad enclosed for your ready reference.

Interestingly the format is very good but the process of feedback is very bad.

The ASCI approaches each lab/establishment of DRDO with the feedback format.  I don’t know whether ASCI knows about the absolute power of DRDO directors or not. Example of LASTEC, when ASCI approached Director, LASTEC, Dr. A K Maini and asked for 20 volunteer names of DRDS, DRTC and Admin allied, he gave names of 20 chamchas (yes-men) in all categories. Can you imagine that ASCI will get the real picture of DRDO work scenario by using such methodology of assessment? It is impossible.  These things repeat everywhere and this futile exercise is for countering CVO, MOD suggestion only.

The major check points for ASCI

Section 2 Point No. 1. (c) Working for nation attitude – Totally missing very few young scientists having such thinking.

(f) Professional freedom – Nil and this is the main reason of the exodus of nearly 700 in the last three years. You can verify this from continuous questions in the parliament on this issue.

(i) Rewards and recognition – Only reserved for chamachas. Please see the last ten years award list (in case of LASTEC local annual awards when Chairman award committee was Dr. R K Tyagi he gave award to himself and when Chairman award committee was Mrs. Neelam Malhan she gave the award to herself. It is not a joke; it is the great award culture of DRDO, which is followed in all awards of DRDO.

(t)Opportunity of Promotion – Only reserved for chamachas. Almost 90% results of every assessment were known by labs officials before assessment. In DRDO, officials are divided in three parts, one whom the director makes sure their promotions, second part those if get clear promotion line or not cleared director doesn’t bother and third part are those for them director makes sure that in any case they have to be deprived for promotion. This is a well known truth of today’s DRDO.

(u)Training – Only reserved for chamachas. Only name of selected officials cleared by Director’s office. It is immaterial whether person selected for training is related with his assigned work or field.

Remaining points are useless.

Point No 3.

(h) Workload – there are more than 50 % workforce (nearly 30000 personal) that has no work load due to outsourcing for minting money. It can be proved by analyzing their specific individual output.

(i)      Grievances redressal mechanism – Very poor it can judged by the increasing number of court cases and representations received by Scientific Adviser , ASCI will not get clear picture from an individual feedback of chamchas.

ASCI will take money and forget but the nation who is going to pay for this HR Audit; it will get a big zero.

It is requested to DRDO’s honest officials to fill the following formats and send to ASCI mail address, nirmalya@asci.org.in to show the clear picture of DRDO to ASCI.asci format asci format1 asci format2

 

asci format3

 

asci format4

RTI-DRDL- Long Recording Time High Speed Video Camera @ Rs 4392620.00

To,                                                                                                                   23 May  2014
Shri YV Ratna Prasad, CPIO,
Defence Research & Development Laboratory
Kanchanbagh,
Hyderabad – 500058                       

 

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect  of procurement of Long Recording Time High Speed Video Camera. The item was purchased against demand of Sh Rohin Koduri, Scientist of DRDL from M/s EVR Engineering Systems Pvt. Ltd vide Supply Order No DRDL/LRS/26/98P/13/013/8489 dated 24.01.14  for Rs 4392620.00, Quantity- 1. The Firm also submitted Bank guarantee of Karnataka Bank No 14721BG000008 dated 21.01.14 validity up to 19.06.14. The item was procured in limited tender mode.

  1. Please provide the date of supply of Long Recording Time High Speed Video Camera.
  2. Please provide the make and model of Long Recording Time High Speed Video Camera.
  3. Please provide the copy of inspection and accepting paper of competent authority.
  4. As the item was procured in limited tender name and address of other firms invited for said tender.
  5. Copy of document submitted by M/s EVR Engineering Systems Pvt claiming for authorized dealer of supplied item as required for after sale and service for such costly equipments.
  6. Present condition of procured Long Recording Time High Speed Video Camera whether working or not working etc.

Note : Matter is directly related to corruption and not exempted under Section 24 (1) as a the  M/s EVR Engineering Systems Pvt Ltd ‘s Field is industrial material handling vide DRDL order no DRDL/LRS/26/98P/10/037/8318 dated 9/3/2011 supplied aluminum container for rocket motors for exorbitant price i.e. Rs 9974242.00 for one piece.

Regards

Prabhu  Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun -248008
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879, e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website www.corruptionindrdo.com

Enclosed – Rs 10 Postal order No 27F 941939

CDA, R&D Hyderabad Hijacked by DRDL, LRSAM, Scientists

To                                                                                                 22nd May 2014
Sh. Upendra Sah, IDAS, PCDA (R&D)
O/o PCDA (R&D), West Block-V
R K PURAM
NEW DELHI- 110066

Subject: CDA, R&D Hyderabad Hijacked by DRDL, LRSAM, Scientists.

The Case of Design, Manufacturing, Supply, Erection and Commissioning of Detachable Integrated Logistics Store Enclosure is a perfect example of hijacking CDA, (R&D) Hyderabad.

The CDA  Sh. A. Ramiaiah, IDAS never read their website’s Mission Statement – We strive to achieve excellence and professionalism in accounting and financial services and in performing audit functions.

Why? Because please see the following case of Design, Manufacturing, Supply, Erection and Commissioning of Detachable Integrated Logistics Store Enclosure (Rs.) 29925000.00

Demand No.  – DRDL/LRS/26/98P/13/049 Demand Date – 31.12.13

Inventory Holder Name –  Sh V. Venkateswarlu , Scientist – D , LRSAM Project  ,DRDL

Rate Rs. 28500000.00 Sales Tax (VAT) 5.00% Tax Value (Rs.) 1425000.00 SO Value with TAX Rs. 29925000.00

Firm Name -M/s. Trinetra Constructions Firm Address – 17-1-388/77/B, Lakshmi Nagar Colony, Saidabad HYDERABAD – 500 059. Firm Phone040 – 2406 4666/2406 4555/2407 1529 Firm Fax040- 2406 4666

BG % of Order Value  10% BG Amount Rs. 2850000 BG. No.35214IGPER0004 BG. Date13.03.14 Validity  11.09.14 Bank Name Andhra Bank

AB / EB / PJB -PJB EB / PJB Letter No. DRDL/LRS/24 EB / PJB Letter Date  30.12.13 EB / PJB Sanction ID No. PB027R1A(b)002 EB / PJB Sanctioned Quantity1 No. EB / PJB Sanction Cost RE -Rs. Lakhs 348.53   Mode of Tender – Limited

S.O. No. DRDL/LRS/26/98P/13/049/8500 Supply order not placed up to the date of Bank Guarantee but the above was the proposed serial no 8500

Key member involved in this particular case from CDA (R&D) is Sh. Ved Veer Arya, IDAS  Indian defence Accountant services  1997 batch officer), finance officer, missile complex (DRDL, ASL, etc.)

PDC -30.06.14- but construction was started early in January 2014… With the bank guarantee dates of Andhra Bank and with construction photos you can co-relate how much ……………… was happening.

The item nomenclature cannot make difference on price. The order is almost 5 to 6 time higher from construction photographs so you can imagine what is cooking. The credential of construction firm can also be a big question.

It is only the tip of the iceberg. It is requested to investigate all cases of M/s. Trinetra Constructions.

It is observed that a number of cases in DRDL were manipulated with involvement of CDA. If you are willing to eradicate corruption the website is ready to help you with all inputs (evidences) of corruption prevailing in different DRDO establishments.

Sir, it is also observed that the honest AO/JCDAs were transferred under pressure of DRDO top brasses and other corrupts are enjoying long posting 5 years 10 years you know cases like the one of most controversial DRDO establishment ITR. The DRDO scientists in the name of secrecy and urgency change the nomenclature and play with specifications, it is suggested such cases be seconded from other organizations without knowledge of DRDO indenters.

अब तो जागो, मोदी जी आ गए हैं.

With great hope that you will look into the matter and do the needful.

Regards,

Prabhu  Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun -248008
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website www.corruptionindrdo.com

Enclosed – Photos of construction in different stagesLRSAM phot 12 Feb

 

LRSAM phot 6 March

LRSAM phot 22 March

LRSAM phot 10 april

DRDL, LRSAM, DRDO Scientists inspired by KARGIL COFFINGATE

coffin-scam-chargesheet-313

KARGIL COFFINGATE

DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT AND MANUFACTURE OF SEA/AIR WORTHY PACKAGING BOXES FOR DRDL PROPULSION SYSTEM
Packaging box would be made from marine plywood (Moister Resistant MR-grade). The marine plywood would be first coated internally as well as externally with a suitable primer and then with a coat of cashew nut based oil for waterproofing.

Size 12 feet X 1.8 feet x 1.5 feet approx Total Board = 32.4 Sq feet
Best marine plywood (Moister Resistant MR-grade) costing – Rs 100- Rs 200 for 19mm Boards – IS:710 – Excellent waterproofing. Used in ship building
Cashew nut based oil – Rs 400 to Rs 600/ Ltrs, Best Paint – Rs 400- Rs 600
Rest as shown in picture foam cushions, Hinges, Lifting brackets Stickers and carpentry charges etc Cost you can guess?wooden case final

Five specimen purchased details of DRDL, DRDO, Hyderabadwooden case order table

 

When DRDO’s party in the US almost went for a toss

Rediff.com  » News » August 09, 2013 11:30 IST

Apparently some officials in the United States consulates in India do not seem to have received the memo about sanctions against Indian entities like the Defence Research and Development Organisation, Indian Space Research Organisation, etc, which were imposed immediately after the May 1998 Pokhran nuclear explosions, being lifted years ago.

Or, still lurking in the shadows of the US State Department are non-proliferation ayatollahs who have not forgiven India for its nuclear tests and are totally opposed to the Indo-US civilian nuclear deal.

These could be the only possible explanations why visa applications of some of the DRDO delegation members were rejected or delayed, which almost made them, miss the official launch last week of the DRDO-developed Explosive Detection Kit in Washington, which was a historic reverse technology transfer by India to the US.

But what is ironical here is that the leading research scientists from DRDO who had applied for visas and were part of the delegation slated to attend the official launch of the EDK had developed and were now transferring a technology that was going to save the continued killing of US troops from IEDs.

This visa issue had gotten so embarrassing that former Defence Secretary William Cohen, now a member of the US-India Business Council’s board of directors, who was presiding along with Ambassador Nirupama Rao at the launch, had to prevail upon Secretary of State John F Kerry and get the visas okayed.

Obviously, not wanting this visa issue to colour the growing Indo-US defence relationship, which he has been promoting assiduously, Cohen said at the outset of the launch that ‘we tend to accentuate the negative in our relationship with India over the years,’ but acknowledged that ‘this most recent snafu about getting visas cleared,’ didn’t help.

Cohen said, ‘We complain about Indian bureaucracy frequently and we only have to look at the mirror and see what happened to American bureaucracy.

‘And thanks to the activities of Secretary Kerry, who at least tried to rectify the errors that we made,’ he said.

In welcoming the DRDO delegation, Cohen said, ‘So we apologize for your delay and I know as a frequent traveller what it means to get off a plane after flying 14 hours and to come directly to a meeting such as this.’

‘So, we are honoured that you are here, embarrassed that we somehow forced you to delay your trip and not give you enough time to rest before coming.’

DRDO Director General Dr Avinash Chander, Dr S Radhakrishnan, Director, Services Interaction and Technology Acquisition, DRDO, Dr S Sunderesh, Chief Controller, R & D, DRDO, Dr Reny M Roy, Scientist at DRDO who lead the team that develop the EDK, and others, immediately from the airport after dumping their baggage at the hotel, had to rush to the US Chamber of Commerce building where hundreds of administration officials, defence industry representatives and fellow scientists had assembled for the official launch.

Aziz Haniffa in Washington, DC

Website inputs

Historic reverse technology transfer by India to the US 

US Company details

As per available records of Ms Faye Crowe, CEO, Crowe and Company 975 Bacons Bridge Road Summerville, SC 29485 USA in Internet is following

Crowe And Company, LLC

975 Bacons Bridge Road
Summerville, SC 29485  
Phone: (843) 991-6759
Company Contacts – Fay Crowe
Business Information
Website: crowderscustomizing.com
Location Type            – Single Location
State of Incorporation          South Carolina
Year Established        2007

Annual Revenue Estimate    100000

Employees      2

SIC Code         8742, Management Consulting Services
NAICS Code    541613, Marketing Consulting Services
Business Categories  
Distribution Channels Consultants in Summerville, SC
Distribution channels consultant
Management Consulting Services
 
Ms Reny M Roy, DRDO Sceintist and Sh Satish R Nayak visited the  M/s Crowe and Company on May 2010, Question is how and what they evaluate above US firm – GOD KNOWS
edk statement of case edk statement of case1 edk statement of case2 edk statement of case3

Fight Against Corruption prevailing at DMSRDE, Kanpur – Act of Desperate D G DRDO

To                                                                                              20th May 2014
Sh Avinash Chander,
DG DRDO, DRDO Bhawan,
Rajaji  Marg, New Delhi-110105

Dear Sir,

This website has been reporting the several cases of corruption/ nepotism and anarchy against SC/ST and weaker section of the society prevailing in DRDO.

The legacy followed from early 80’s has shown that instead of to counter the corruption / nepotism the top brasses of DRDO has carved out a mechanism to disseminate the whistle blowers.

The whistle blowers of DMSRDE, Kanpur who had been helping the DRDO Hqrs to keep an eagle eye on corrupt practices of senior officials and Director of DMSRDE has been served transfer orders to Timbuktu.

DRDO Hqrs thinks the transfer order is a only weapon to solve the problem and divert attention from corruption, but those days are over now.

Sh R P Bhat, Scientist ’F’ and Sh Naveen Prakash Gupta, Scientist ’C’ both were awarded transfer order on 19th May 2014 afternoon and immediately relived on account of their fight against corruption of Dr A K Saxena, Director, DMSRDE, Kanpur.

The transfer shows that DRDO Hqrs is deaf and dumb and bunch of corrupt officials who are protecting corrupt officials of DMSRDE are not able to hear the Modi’s Hunkar against corruption. The clear mandate by 125 crores people of India for eradication of corruption and corrupts only.

In similar case Sh Prakash Singh, SAO-II, LASTEC, DRDO, Delhi, who exposed the corrupt practices of Dr A K Maini, Director, LASTEC.  Sh Prakash Singh was dismissed by service on the wrong feedback of Dr A K Maini.  Defence Minister noticed the truth and reinstated Sh Prakash Singh and ordered high level inquiry against corrupt officials. To avoid the consequences of investigation Dr Maini took the VRS and the current position of the case is on your table as CVO, MOD was not satisfied with DRDO Hqrs reply in Dr Maini’s case.

The same bunch of officials of DRDO Hqrs who suggested the termination of Sh Prakash Singh, SAO-II is instrumental in recent transfer orders of DMSRDE scientists. You very well know the then DG Dr V K Saraswat did not apply his mind in Sh Prakash Singh’s case and trusted those bunch of flatterers and result he was out unceremoniously and CBI sword is also hanging.

Sir, if at all you can prove your worthiness, please gives your reaction in turn help the organization.

With warm regards

Prabhu Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008
Phone – 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website – www.corruptionindrdo.com

Appeal to clean DRDO of corrupt and anti-national officials