Tag Archives: Sh

Drdo

RTI is only weapon to correct the mind of so called Dictators of DRDO

2 Comments

Dear friends of DRDO,

Following inputs being published for awareness of all DRDO officials. All of them are experiencing the arbitrariness of entire DRDO‘s Lab directors. Every year you all are silent spectators of this arbitrary conduct of the respective lab directors when DRDS or DRTC promotion’s results are declared.

Few days’ frustration looks are seen on the faces of few but again they indulge in the same cycle. If you seriously observe the health condition of DRDO scientists, this time every year a bitter sip of humiliation distorted the life and health conditions of each one.

It is not because of their failure in assessment. It is because of the success of those incompetent / working on non-scientific assignments.

Earlier in days of beginning of 90’s this kind of push pull was not done openly or in a big way. One or two cases were seen in entire DRDO, but nowadays Directors, New born DG’s, DRDO Hqrs beloved boys are fully creating dadagiri and clearing/helping incompetent and ignoring all those who are seriously involved in scientific research and development.

Although the exodus ratio dropout because of two reasons. One, the world economic recession and two, the VIth pay commission hike in pay package of scientists, but this frustration directly affected their output and as well as their daily life. The enthusiasm of young scientists is lost in DRDO and now they are involved to mint money in all means. An example would be like the LTC 80 scam of Metcalf house is a clear signal of the mindset of the new generation of DRDO team.

The following papers are the example of dadagiri of DRDO lab directors. Sh. M R Gupta, TO ‘C’ was joined DRDO in 9 Nov 1979 as JSA – II, subsequently transferred IRDE in 1981 and in 1987 in DEAL, he is IETE graduate (1987), presently he is working as TO ‘C’ in DEAL since 2008. As per normal conditions he is supposed to get a promotion in 2001.

Sh. M R Gupta rested his ACR/APAR through RTI in 2013 from 1987 to 2013 after a long battle CIC ordered to supply all ACR to DRDO on 4th March 2014 vide File No.CIC/LS/A/2013/001815/RM dated 2014 “DECISION – The Commission directed the CPIO to provide copies of ACRs for the period 1987-2007 as sought by the appellant within three weeks from the date of receipt of this order, free of cost”

Now see in followin enclosed document, Sh M R Gupta shocked to see that his two year ACR/ APAR of 1995 and 96 was blank and in 2004 ACR/APAR was reviewed by Sh Y P Sehgal, Ex Sc ‘G’ illegally as Sh M R Gupta was never worked with him and put adverse remark “ One disciplinary case is with DRDO Hqrs”  and remark was duly approved by the Director, Sh Ashok Sen and best part of this RTI revealed that it was not even communicated to Sh M R Gupta.

This illegal unethical act done by Sh. Ashok Sen, then Director, DEAL was perfect example of DRDO work atmosphere, which proves that the absolute power made DRDO Lab’s director became autocratic/dictator/tyrant, etc.

This is not the only case you will find this kind of act in the entire DRDO. RTI’s also revealed that in several cases white fluid applied in ACR/APAR, tempering of marks in any stage even after in final stage at DRDO Hqrs.

It is requested to all suffering DRDO officials to please file RTIs with reference to supreme court order of Justice Markandey Katju, in Devi dutt Vs Union of India  (CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7631 OF 2002) to confirm your ACR/APAR marks and comments.

One more important observation is that these DRDO Lab’s director also authenticating false claim of work to their beloved incompetent scientists.

Hope with the following example you all will review your promotion profile and analyze the possible flaw in the process of DRDO’s promotion mechanism.

Regards

mr gupta ACR1-2004mr gupta ACR2-2004

mr gupta ACR3-2004

To,                                                                                                           5th May 2014
Dr. Sangeeta Khare, CPIO
DEAL, DRDO
Raipur Road, DEHRADUN-248001             

Madam,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect to my ACR/APAR of year 2004. Recently on 11th April 2014 CPIO, CEPTAM send me ACR/APAR from 1987 -2007. In 2014 ACR/APAR assessing officer was Sh K Siva Kumar, Sc ‘F’ and reviewing officer Sh Y P Sehgal, Sc ‘G’(copy enclosed). Sh Y P Sehgal, Sc ‘G’ reviewing officer put adverse remark in para 5 –“one disciplinary case is with DRDO Hqrs”.

  1. Provide the certified copy of disciplinary case which was pending in DRDO Hqrs against me as mentioned by RO, Sh Y P Sehgal, Sc ‘G’.
  2. Present status of disciplinary case which was mentioned by RO Sh Y P Sehgal, Sc ‘G’.
  3. Provide the certified copy of communication letter of above adverse remark.
  4. Provide the DO part order/ION on the basis RO mentioned in APAR/ACR para 2 that I have served under him form 1st June 2004 to 31st December 2004.

Note. The information sought for concerns related to my life and health condition. I am in mental agony, my health is deteriorating day by day, and necessary medical certificates from Fortis & Max Hospital are enclosed for your ready reference. It is requested the information should be provided within forty-eight hours of the receipt of the request, so that my health will improve sharply.

Enclosed:-

  1. Photocopy of APAR/ACR of 2004
  2. Medical Certificate of Fortis Hospital, Chandigarh
  3. Medical Certificate of Max Hospital, Dehradun

Thanking You

(M. R. Gupta)
             T O ‘C’
21- Bank Colony, Adhoiwala
Raipur Road, DEHRADUN – 2248001
 
Rs 10 fee is deposited cashmr gupta rti DEAL reply
Drdo

Atrocities on SC/ST in DRDO – Police Investigation Begin

3 Comments

Dehradun -3rd July 2014

An official of DEAL, DRDO Sh. Jagdish Kumar, Technical Officer ‘C’ reported SSP, Dehradun against the crime committed by Sh. R K Agarwal, Scientist ‘H’ Principal Associate Director, (Farzi Designation because as per RTI information there is no such gazette notification), DEAL.

Today at 2:30 PM Sub Inspector B P Singh visited DEAL and asked comments from Sh. R K Agarwal on Sh. Jagdish Kumar’s complaint under atrocity act. Sub Inspector B P Singh was escorted from DEAL gate to Sh. R K Agarwal’s room by Sh VVS Panwar, Technical Officer ‘C’ who is presently  looking security officer assignment and Sh Balwant, security in-charge.   As per Sub Inspector B P Singh, Raipur Thana that Sh. R K Agarwal told him that a written reply of queries will be submitted as soon as possible.

Sh. Jagdish Kumar, Technical Officer ‘C’ accused Sh. R K Agarwal that his APAR marks intentionally downgraded due to hatred towards the SC community. Sh. R K Agarwal’s malicious act was proved by ASCODAR committee headed by Dr S S Negi, Scientist H, IRDE, Dehradun, which in turn restored the APAR marks.

Sh Jagdish Kumar, TO – C, DEAL, Dehradun send a representation to DG, DRDO and requested action against Sh R K Agarwal, Scientist H, DEAL, Dehradun for ill treated as he belongs to SC community.

DRDO Hqr Letter No. DOP/01/00008/DEAL/M/01 dated 12th March 2014 in reference of representation of Sh Jagdish Kumar, TO – C, DEAL, Dehradun and directed Sh R C Agarwal, Director, DEAL to assure Sh Jagdish Kumar in this regard.

But king of nepotism Sh R C Agarwal, Director, DEAL ignored the DG, DRDO directives and encouraged Sh. R K Agarwal to commit such crime. Sh Jagdish Kumar explored all option and at last he approached local police for seek justice.jagdish firjagdish fir1 jagdish fir2 jagdish fir3 jagdish fir4 jagdish fir5 jagdish fir6

Drdo

DRDO senior scientists feel that DRDO Admin cadre is the biggest hurdle in their day to day manipulations

1 Comment

In DRDO Directors’ Conference 2010, above mentioned view was unopposed accepted by almost all top brasses of DRDO.

Then to defy DOPT guidelines of FCS (Flexible Complementing Scheme) DRDO started to assign scientists, the admin allied and other non technical jobs as full time. Like Administration, Stores, Library, Conservancy, Works, Security, Motor Transport, etc.

As a result, now you see the chaos created by these incompetent scientists everywhere in DRDO. The number of court cases increased multifold. More than hundreds cases are running in various judiciary bodies all over the India. It can be verified by the amount spending by DRDO after 2010 onward.

Now scientists are running after these non scientific assignments because they witnessed in last several  years the promotion jumps of scientists who are engaged in sundry work.

Interestingly, senior scientists who enjoyed these non scientific assignments are also able to pitch their after retirement assignments as consultants on contracts, etc. or members/chairman post of various committees where there are no age limits boundaries.

Recently, scientists also established one more area in the recruitment of admin assistant process for the interview board CEPTAM asked for admin rep. In LASTEC, Dr. A K Maini turned down the name of Sh. Prakash Singh, Senior Administrative Officer -II the single available official for required demand. Instead he sent the name of Ms. Sangeeta Talwar, ineligible for said interview board member as Admin Rep.

Second example that for the same recruitment of admin assistant process for the interview board, Jodhpur, CEPTAM asked for admin rep from DEAL Dehradun. The Director, DEAL, Sh. R C Agarwal proposed the name of his staff officer Sh. Vipin Kaushik, Scientist ‘F’ instead of Sh. K K Mishra, Joint Director, Administration.

There are several examples recently of Sh. Ashok Gupta, Technical Officer ‘C’ INMAS, DRDO who got deputation appointment of Senior Administrative Officer -I through UPSC in SSPL then shifted to DRDO Hqrs., DRDO. This foolish act shows DRDO situation is really very pitiable. How can a technical officer who is recruited for technical job avails the arbitration being a technical person got certified by Director, INMAS and concurrence by DRDO Hqrs that he did administrative /stores assignments.

Government of India has looked in to this DRDO rules manipulation game because these manipulations are a major cause of unproductiveness of this white elephant.

Drdo

Every fortnight launching a missile – hidden agenda of DRDO

Leave a comment

Sh. Narendra Modi ji, Honorable Prime Minister when asked about Indo-Pak relations he said “Talks get lost in the noise of bomb blasts.” It was a simple and effective way to convey the message to our neighbor.

Since 1999, when DRDO credentials were on stake due to the exposure of its strength in KARGIL WAR, the then Genral Malik openly criticized the role of DRDO.

DRDO planned to create a thunderous noise to divert the attention of the government and common people of India by simply launching missiles. After smelling the effect, it started missile launching roughly at the interval of fortnights with different variant of missiles like Prithvi, I, II, III, Akash, Agni I, II, III, IV, V, IV Nag, Trishul and ………….

All the developed nations have demonstrated the ability to analyze the failures and incorporated the corrective measures and are able to sell and generate revenue out of their research.

DRDO, however justifies the failures and with thunderous noise tries to divert the attention of government and common people of India who in turn pay crores and crores rupees for the development of missiles.

No practical data showed on photographs of missile launching or hitting the target has been shown to the nation. DRDO always released the launching flight scene but never demonstrated the kill probability. Why the matter of fact as per sources that last month Sh. Avinash Chandra witnessed the target hitting of a 100 KW laser Aditya which was suppose to hit moving targets. It was not able to hit static target, in fact it missed it by meters. The case of 20 KW Coil laser is also an example that without delivering the required output project main 16.58 Cr. equipment was mysteriously burned in fire accident but surprisingly DRDO announced that the project was successful and a successful completion letter from under secretary, MOD, Mr. Deb was put in project file to fool the government and common men of India who are paying the money for their misadventure. And the best part of this is that he project leader Dr. R K Tyagi got scientist of the year award from DRDO.

In 1991 Gulf war, Americans demonstrated the capability of Patriot missile’s hitting and intercepting the Scud missile and the scene was witnessed across the globe.

Can SA to RM demonstrate the same capability to our new Prime Minister Sh. Modi Ji? It will help him plan the defence preparedness to secure the boundary.

DRDO by far has a hidden agenda of launching a missile in every fortnight just to divert the attention of the government and common people of India from the rampant corruption of DRDO misappropriation of funds, misinterpretation of rules, the common practices noticed by the CGDA in special audit of DRDO.

Since the KARGIL WAR, incompetency has flourished in DRDO and has created a void as a result. Those who were supposed to retire from active service have managed during UPA government two to even three extensions with promotions ignoring Honorable Supreme Court and violating DoPT guidelines.

They are involved with 1000 crores of programs (of course without any end result) the commission/omission does not permit them to lose the extra income and perks and they are blessed by the competent authorities.

India has voted for a strong government in the centre and expecting new government will sense the weaker points and fix the accountability of DRDO. The government will look what was the compulsion of previous governments or in which circumstance they gave such unprecedented extension to such selected group of people like

Dr A S Pillai, CC&D, CEO, Brahmos touching 67 years CCR&D since 13th Sep. 1999.

Dr. SK Vasudeva, Ex Director, SPIC, DRDO after three successive extensions now working in contract

Sh Avinash Chander, SA to RM, DG, DRDO, Secretary, DRD presently in second extension and after November 2014 on contractual appointment.

5 Top DRDO senior officials are in second extension

Few directors of Labs are on second extension

And 60 to 62 years extension countless in DRDO

Extension business has created a vacuum in DRDO Hqrs. and if it continues probably there won’t be manpower available from active service to head the Lab and shoulder the responsibility of DRDO’s plan of action. “Here at present nobody is responsible for any outcome”

Drdo

After First Extension, Second Extension than Contract without output please spare the country

Leave a comment
To                                                                                                                                 27th may 2014
Sh. Narendra Modi
Prime Minister
Room No – 152, PMO,
South Block, NEW DELHI -110011

Subject:  The Appointment Committee of the Cabinet appointed Sh. Avinash Chander on contract basis.

With the passage of time the dignity of the office of Scientific Adviser to RM has taken a nose dive. Initially the organization (DRDO) was headed by eminent scholars and internationally recognized faces like Dr. D S Kothari, Dr. S Bhagavantam, Dr. B D Nagchaudhuri, Prof. M G K  Menon, Dr. Raja Ramanna and Dr. V S Arunachalam  whose scientific contribution were know across the globe.

Unfortunately when the honorary post of the Scientific Adviser to RM was converted to DG, DRDO and Secretary DRD, the takers of the plum post were apolitical. The search committee used to recommend a person with established credentials as the individual would lead 30000 strong scientific/technical workforces and was supposed to deliver products for three defence forces.

The KARGIL War however exposed the credit of DRDO as countrymen were ditched. The justification of successive failures was given as the non-availability of imported critical systems/subsystems, components, etc.

Later, the top offices gave a new theory of system integration instead of developing indigenous systems/subsystems as import substitutes. The successive government was not in a position to analyze properly the role of DRDO and the fallout was that a vacuum was created in the chain of command.

As far as the expenditure is concerned, the office of Scientific Adviser’s focus shifted to infrastructure development (primarily acquiring land, expansion of building and dumping of equipment) instead of research and development of systems.

DRDO consumes Rs. 10000 crores annually.

The scientific community down the channel are preparing justification for annual expenditure and in the absence of ACCOUNTABILITY they simply burry the product in the name of technology demonstration with obsolete technology imported from elsewhere.

When Dr. V K Saraswat, Ex-SA to RM was due to retire after successive extensions. The search committee was ignorant to the requirement of SA to RM’s office and new incumbent Sh. Avinash Chander was selected by ACC out of the 12 officers without having any credential to their account even on national level.

The information revealed under RTI is enclosed for your ready reference.

Honorable Sir, after sixty six years of independence, for first time people of India have given such a great and unprecedented mandate based on your commitment, patriotism and providing avenues for betterment of the country.

The previous government, even after being in office for two successive terms, had failed to implement ACCOUNTABILITY in DRDO. DRDO with passage of time has reduced to a mere organization where the workforce is provided hefty salaries as social commitments.

We hope that DRDO will overhaul thoroughly and with ACCOUNTABILITY enforced, turn into a productive organization.

Currently, DRDO has a large number of scientists in service extensions 60 to 62 and 62 to 64 and the astonishing fact is that maximum are involved in non-scientific activities.

Early address to this “extension business” and “Contract Business” will help to curb the neck deep corruption in DRDO.

It is really strange that in 125 crore families, we have not been able to find the right eligible person and have ended up relying upon contract culture.

With warm regards

Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008
Phone – 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
E-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com, Website – www.corruptionindrdo.com

 

Enclosed

  1. Copy of RTI reply from CPIO, Cabinet Secretariatavanash chander recuirtment details avanash chander recuirtment details1 avanash chander recuirtment details2
Drdo

CDA, R&D Hyderabad Hijacked by DRDL, LRSAM, Scientists

1 Comment
To                                                                                                 22nd May 2014
Sh. Upendra Sah, IDAS, PCDA (R&D)
O/o PCDA (R&D), West Block-V
R K PURAM
NEW DELHI- 110066

Subject: CDA, R&D Hyderabad Hijacked by DRDL, LRSAM, Scientists.

The Case of Design, Manufacturing, Supply, Erection and Commissioning of Detachable Integrated Logistics Store Enclosure is a perfect example of hijacking CDA, (R&D) Hyderabad.

The CDA  Sh. A. Ramiaiah, IDAS never read their website’s Mission Statement – We strive to achieve excellence and professionalism in accounting and financial services and in performing audit functions.

Why? Because please see the following case of Design, Manufacturing, Supply, Erection and Commissioning of Detachable Integrated Logistics Store Enclosure (Rs.) 29925000.00

Demand No.  – DRDL/LRS/26/98P/13/049 Demand Date – 31.12.13

Inventory Holder Name –  Sh V. Venkateswarlu , Scientist – D , LRSAM Project  ,DRDL

Rate Rs. 28500000.00 Sales Tax (VAT) 5.00% Tax Value (Rs.) 1425000.00 SO Value with TAX Rs. 29925000.00

Firm Name -M/s. Trinetra Constructions Firm Address – 17-1-388/77/B, Lakshmi Nagar Colony, Saidabad HYDERABAD – 500 059. Firm Phone040 – 2406 4666/2406 4555/2407 1529 Firm Fax040- 2406 4666

BG % of Order Value  10% BG Amount Rs. 2850000 BG. No.35214IGPER0004 BG. Date13.03.14 Validity  11.09.14 Bank Name Andhra Bank

AB / EB / PJB -PJB EB / PJB Letter No. DRDL/LRS/24 EB / PJB Letter Date  30.12.13 EB / PJB Sanction ID No. PB027R1A(b)002 EB / PJB Sanctioned Quantity1 No. EB / PJB Sanction Cost RE -Rs. Lakhs 348.53   Mode of Tender – Limited

S.O. No. DRDL/LRS/26/98P/13/049/8500 Supply order not placed up to the date of Bank Guarantee but the above was the proposed serial no 8500

Key member involved in this particular case from CDA (R&D) is Sh. Ved Veer Arya, IDAS  Indian defence Accountant services  1997 batch officer), finance officer, missile complex (DRDL, ASL, etc.)

PDC -30.06.14- but construction was started early in January 2014… With the bank guarantee dates of Andhra Bank and with construction photos you can co-relate how much ……………… was happening.

The item nomenclature cannot make difference on price. The order is almost 5 to 6 time higher from construction photographs so you can imagine what is cooking. The credential of construction firm can also be a big question.

It is only the tip of the iceberg. It is requested to investigate all cases of M/s. Trinetra Constructions.

It is observed that a number of cases in DRDL were manipulated with involvement of CDA. If you are willing to eradicate corruption the website is ready to help you with all inputs (evidences) of corruption prevailing in different DRDO establishments.

Sir, it is also observed that the honest AO/JCDAs were transferred under pressure of DRDO top brasses and other corrupts are enjoying long posting 5 years 10 years you know cases like the one of most controversial DRDO establishment ITR. The DRDO scientists in the name of secrecy and urgency change the nomenclature and play with specifications, it is suggested such cases be seconded from other organizations without knowledge of DRDO indenters.

अब तो जागो, मोदी जी आ गए हैं.

With great hope that you will look into the matter and do the needful.

Regards,

Prabhu  Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun -248008
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website www.corruptionindrdo.com

Enclosed – Photos of construction in different stagesLRSAM phot 12 Feb

 

LRSAM phot 6 March

LRSAM phot 22 March

LRSAM phot 10 april

Drdo

Heights of Ego of Retiring Director, LASTEC, DRDO

1 Comment

It is heartening to inform you all that Director, LASTEC, DRDO has such caliber that he has written more than a dozen books and some are not even of his field.

Beside this he is an expert in down grading APAR marks of honest officers. Before the paper reaches him he compels the assessing and reviewing officer to downgrade APAR marks.

On 5th May 2014 he exercised his absolute power, which is with him up to 3rd June 2014, and compelled assessing officer to downgrade APAR marks of Sh. Prakash Singh, SAO-II who was certified as an honest officer by Honorable Defence Minister Sh. A. K. Antony.  Assessing officer initially gave 90 Marks to Sh. Prakash Singh, SAO-II. However, Director, LASTEC, DRDO Dr. Anil Kumar Maini terrorized the assessing officer and the 90 marks became 83 and whitener was used on 8 places.

Amazingly, Dr. Anil Kumar Maini not satisfied even after down grading APAR of Sh Prakash Singh, SAO-II. He again called assessing officer on 13th May 2014 and threatened to use Official Secret Act, 1923 on him, this was the retort of Dr Maini as stated by reliable sources after seeing the 5th May comments on website www. corruptionindrdo.com.

These 8 white blots are basically not on the APAR of Sh. Prakash Singh SAO-II but they are in your bag which you are carrying with you after superannuation (VRS).

Hope Sh. Avinash Chander, DG, DRDO will protect  the assessing officer from the sharp horns of ? for the sake of dignity of DRDO.

खुदा जाने ये ईगोइस्ट डीआरडीडीओ डायरेक्टर्स  डीआरडीडीओ को किस रसातल तक ले जायेंगे ?

Drdo

Ego & high handedness of Lab Directors ruined the Defence Preparedness.

8 Comments
To                                                                                                         5th May 2014  
Sh A K Antony,
Defence Minister
Room -104, South Block,
New Delhi – 110011

Subject: Ego & high handedness of Lab Directors ruined the defence preparedness.

There are several cases of such criminal offences of DRDO Directors where, the day he assumes charge, he becomes an authority without accountability, capable of implementing corruption and nepotism under his control. He deceives the organizational goal.

Dr. Anil Kumar Maini, Director LASTEC, DRDO has set an example of personal vendetta against an honest hard working officer Sh. Prakash Singh, Senior Administrative Officer – II (SAO-II), LASTEC, DRDO

Dr. Maini is frustrated because Sh. Prakash Singh exposed his corrupt practices to CBI. Dr. Maini mislead DRDO Hqrs. managing Compulsory Retirement Orders (CRS) for Sh. Prakash Singh.

After one year, honorable Defence Minister noticed this injustice and Sh. Prakash Singh was reinstated.

For three years in successive prior to 2014 Sh. Prakash Singh was given 65 marks only in APAR. After reinstatement the responsible officer under whom Sh. Prakash Singh reporting Joint Director (AFHQ Cadre) is well versed with the criticality of work assigned to Sh. Prakash Singh and his committed involvement towards day to day administrative work has evaluated him with 90 marks.

When Dr. Anil Kumar Maini came to know about the APAR marks of Sh. Prakash Singh, he was annoyed with the assessing officer, the Joint Director (AFHQ Cadre) and told him to give a justification/presentation in front of board of senior scientists of LASTEC.

Such irresponsible act of Dr. Anil Kumar Maini for ego satisfaction may create a divide in DRDO cadre.

It has been brought to the notice of honorable Defence Minister several times, that administrative responsibilities given to scientists are not being performed according to laid down constitutional provisions. Most of the time, “Chamchas” follow the director’s verbal orders blindly. The DRDO lab directors busy with settle their personal vendetta they don’t have time to see the national interest.

It is requested that appropriate directive may be issued to Dr. Anil Kumar Maini to stop the harassing of honest officials of LASTEC, DRDO.

With warm regards

Prabhu Dayal Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun-248008
Phone – 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,    
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com 
website – www.corruptionindrdo.com 
Drdo

RTI – LRSAM – CDA(R&D), Hyderabad

Leave a comment
To                                                                             27th March 2014
Shri T.Rambabu,
IDAS, Addl CDA(R&D),
Opposite to DRDL Gate,
Kanchanbagh Post Office,
Hyderabad-500058.

Hello,

Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of LRSAM Project, DRDL’s demand of  Design, Manufacturing, Supply, Erection and Commissioning of Detachable Integrated Logistics Store Enclosure vide Demand No. DRDL/LRS/26/98P/13/049 Demand Dated 31/12/13. Demand raised by Sh. V. Venkateswarlu , Scientist – D , LRSAM Project, DRDL. The Erection and Commissioning is already started in first week of February 2014 by M/s Trinetra Constructions, 17-1-388/77/B, Lakshmi Nagar Colony, Saidabad, HYDERABAD – 500059 without supply order and much before TEC & TPC. The case initiated in limited tender mode and cost finalized  at Rs.  28500000.00 Sales Tax (VAT) 5.00% Tax Value   Rs. 1425000.00 SO Value with TAX  Rs.  29925000.00. The Bank Guarantee of Rs 2850000.00 (10% of order value) vide Bank Guarantee No 35214IGPER0004 dated 13/03/2104 of Andhra Bank. The Supply order S.O. No. DRDL/LRS/26/98P/13/049/8500 not yet placed but the above was the proposed serial no 8500. In this case it seems that Defence Purchase Manual 2009 was totally ignored.

  1. Name and designation of CDA (R&D), Hyderabad Rep attends TPC of above case.
  2. Certified copy of noting and recommendation of CDA (R&D), Hyderabad rep on above case.
  3. Sh Vedveer Arya , IDAS ( Indian defence Accountant services  1997 batch officer ), finance officer, missile complex, Hyderabad is member of approval committee in respect of above case. Yes/No
  4. If yes the copy of his noting and recommendation of Sh Vedveer Arya on the above said file.

Note : Matter is directly related to corruption and not exempted under Section 24 (1) as a proof the photos of above said   Detachable Integrated Logistics Store Enclosure are enclosed.

Regards
Prabhu  Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun -248008 
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website www.corruptionindrdo.com

Enclosed – Photos of construction in different stages

Registration Number            MODEF/R/2014/60600

Drdo

RTI – DoPT – Sh Avinash Chander

Leave a comment
To                                                                   29th January 2014
Sh. Subandhu Basu, CPIO,
US (SM-I),
Room no. 23, North Block,
New Delhi

Hello

Please refer to Appointment Committee of the Cabinet letter no 12/9/2013- EO (SM-I) dated 31 May 2013 in respect of appointment of Sh Avinash Chander, DS, CC R&D (M&SS) as Secretary, DRDO cum DG,DRDO and Scientific Adviser to Raksha Mantri for period of three years.

In Para 2 of this letter “The appointment of Sh Avinash Chander beyond his date of retirement i.e. 30.11.2014 would be on contract basis with the same terms and conditions as he would be entitled to Secretary (DRD) before the date of retirement.”

In reference to the above kindly provide the following information under RTI Act 2005.

  1. Names of officials considered by Appointment Committee of the Cabinet for Secretary, (DRD) and their respective age at the time of consideration.
  2. Members name of Appointment Committee of the Cabinet who were approved the appointment of Sh Avinash Chander as Secretary (DRD).
  3. The certified copy of Appointment Committee of the Cabinet recommendation for  the appointment of Sh Avinash Chander as Secretary (DRD)
  4. Has Government of India appointed any Secretary previously on contract basis beyond the age of 65 years? (Yes/No)
  5. Whether required vigilance clearance obtained before approval of said appointment (yes/No)

 

Regards

Prabhu  Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur,
Dehradun-248008
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website www.corruptionindrdo.com

 

Registration Number – DOP&T/R/2014/60387