Category Archives: Drdo

Drdo

RTI-PMO- Sh Avinash Chander, DG, DRDO, Secretary, DRD, SA to RM

6 Comments

To                                                                       2nd November 2014
Shri Syed Ekram Rizwi,
CPIO, PMO,
South Block,
New Delhi – 110011

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of Rule 4 of CCS(Conducts) Rules 1964 – “Employment of near relatives of Govt. servants in companies or firms”, GOI [MHA OM No. 25/43/55-Ests.(A), dated 19.01.1956] – “ Propriety of sons and near relatives of Class I (now Group A) officers seeking employment in private firms which enjoy Government patronage” and GOI [MHA OM No. 24/43/56-Ests.(A), dated 26.05.1957] – Awarding of contract to a firm in which son/daughter/dependent of an officer is employed.

Shri Avinash Chander is holding the post of Secretary, DRD since 31 May 2013.
PMO is custodian of information related to Secretary of all Ministries/Department.
kindly provide following information under Section 6(1) of RTI Act.

1. Whether son/daughter/wife of Shri Avinash Chander is proprietor, partner, shareholder or employee of the any company, firm or business group that deals with any procurement /supply /fabrication/business/contracts related activity in any Establishment/Unit/Lab of DRDO. (Yes/No)
2. If answer to point(1) is Yes then provide the following details:
i. Relation with family member (son/daughter/wife)
ii. Name & address of family member/dependent
iii. Name of Company/Firm/Business Group with address
iv. Relation with Company/Firm – Proprietor /Partner /Shareholder or Employee
v. Stake in Company/Firm of the family member in case partner or shareholder
3. If answer to point(1) is Yes then provide the following details regarding contracts awarded/Supply Orders issued by DRDO to that company/firm during the years 2010 -2014
i. Total cost of contracts awarded/supply orders issued to that company/firm
ii. Total number of contracts awarded/supply order issued to that company/firm
4. If answer to point(1) is Yes then whether Shri Avinash Chander declared the facts and desist himself from the dealing of the case while award of contract/supply order or exercise patronage in favour of the company/firm as required under Rules 4 of CCS(Conducts) Rule 1964. (Yes/No)
5. If answer to point (4) is Yes then provide the copies of declarations submitted by Shri Avinash Chander to DRDO/MOD/Government of India
6. .Whether Shri Avinash Chander intimated to Government under provisions of Rule 4 of CCS (Conducts) Rules, 1964 regarding acceptance of employment of his son/daughter/dependent in the company/firm that has official dealing with DRDO. (Yes/No)
7. If answer to point (6) is Yes then provide copy of intimation regarding acceptance of employment by son/daughter/dependent under the provisions of Rule 4 of CCS (Conducts) Rules, 1964.

Regards
Prabhu Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur,
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com website www.corruptionindrdo.com

Registration Number PMOIN/R/2014/61523

Drdo

Sh Avinash Chander is not interested to take any action on DMSRDE corruption cases

7 Comments
To                                                                                                        1st  November 2014
Hon’ble
Shri Arun Jaitly,
Raksha Mantri,
Room No 104, South Block,
New Delhi-110011

 

SUBJECT:  Sh Avinash Chander is not interested to take any action on DMSRDE corruption cases.

Sir,

I would like to draw your kind attention towards corruption in tunes of crores at Defence Materials & Stores Research & Development Establishment (DMSRDE), Kanpur, an establishment under Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO), Ministry of Defence, Government of India.

Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena was appointed as Scientist ‘C’ on 28.04.1984 in DMSRDE, Kanpur and since then he is continuously posted at DMSRDE, Kanpur since last 30 years. He has not been transferred even for a day from Kanpur and since the date of his posting he is working at Kanpur.  The roots of the Dr. Saxena while working at DMSRDE, Kanpur has become so deep that he was involved in various activities involving the financial & other administrative irregularities.

Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena, Scientist ‘G’ was appointed as Director, DMSRDE, Kanpur wef 01 January 2011. In spite of the fact that he has been involved in various financial and administrative irregularities , Dr. Saxena was  promoted to the rank of Scientist ‘H’ wef 02 August 2012 and since then he is  holding the rank of Scientist ‘H’ and working as Director, DMSRDE.

The right from his appointment as Director, he was involved in various kinds of administrative & financial irregularities that lead corruption in tunes of crores. Several complaints were made against Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena to then Defence Minister by some scientists of DMSRDE.

Being a RTI activist and social worker running a website corruptionindrdo.com to expose the corruption in DRDO, also made as far as 12 complaints regarding corruption in procurements of various instruments & materials etc in DMSRDE by Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena, Director, DMSRDE to CVC, Hon’ble Defence Minister and DGR&D, DRDO. These complaints were filed during 29 Nov 2013 to 11 June 2014. Total cost of store items procured against which complaints were filed is about Rs. 7.5 crore. A complete list of complaints filed by me to CVC and Hon’ble Defence Minister is annexed as Annexure No. -1.

All the aforesaid complaints made have been endorsed by Central Vigilance Commission (CVC). CVC has taken cognizance of aforesaid complaints and registered on prima facia.  These complaints have been forwarded to Chief Vigilance Office (CVO), Ministry of Defence for further enquiry/investigation of the aforesaid complaints. Under the provisions of RTI Act 2005 the CPIO, CVC vide letter no. CVC/RTI/13/1862/241925 dated 18.03.2014 informed to me that his complaints have been forwarded to CVO (MOD) for investigation.

Under RTI Act, CPIO, CVO MOD informed that all complaints have been forwarded to Director, Vigilance & Security, DRDO for further inquiry and asked the consolidated report from DRDO vide their letter dated 04 August 2014.

Meantime, A FFIC was constituted by Shri Avinash Chander, DG, DRDO to inquire the complaints against Dr. Saxena. The Fact Finding Inquiry Committee visited DMSRDE, Kanpur on 13th – 14th, March 2014 for inquiry on the complaint submitted against Dr. Saxena. The said committee submitted its report to Shri Avinash Chander but no action taken by DRDO against Dr. Saxena, Director.

It is very surprising and interesting that Shri Avinash Chander again set up another four members Fact Finding Inquiry Committee  under chairmanship of Dr. D.C. Pandey, Scientist ‘H’ LRDE and three members Sri Hari Babu Srivastava, Scientist ‘G’, Director, LASTECH, Sri Jagdeep, Scientist ‘F’ and Sri R.S. Mehta, Joint Director. The said committee visited DMSRDE, Kanpur recently on 9-10 July 2014. Therefore constitution of two FFIC by Shri Avinash Chander establishes that there were complaints against Dr. Saxena but to give him patronage and support the Shri Avinash Chander set up illegal FFIC. This second FFIC also submitted its report to Shri Avinash Chander but still no action against Dr. A.K Saxena took place by DRDO.

Interestingly, 31st October in the eve of Vigilance week, Sh. R.S. Mehta, Joint Director, Vigilance, DRDO in his address mentioned to audience that how the corrupt practices adopted by Director, DMSRDE and his team in procurement cases.

Sir, it is not understandable that why Shri Avinash Chander constituted two fact finding committees? Why DRDO is silent on corruption cases of DMSRDE, Kanpur? Why Shri Avinash Chander is protecting Dr. A.K. Saxena?

In light of the above mentioned facts, it is requested that speedy action needed to save precious funds of poor tax payers. Dr A K Saxena openly using same corrupt practices in ongoing procurements cases. He told to his beloved team that Dr. V Bhujanga Rao, DG,NS&IC directed that left Rs 13 crores should be spend up to 31st March 2015 positively.

Regards
 
Prabhu  Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun
Ph   0135 2787750, Mobile 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website   www.corruptionindrdo.com

Annexure:-

  1. List of complaints/cases filed to CVC and Defence Minister against Dr. Arvind Kumar Saxena, Director, DMSRDE, Kanpur

    DMSRDE CVC Cases
    DMSRDE CVC Cases
Drdo

Why do people want to go private organizations? Is it because they do good work and they are rewarded? Do you have any method of incentives for good work done by scientists? Please elaborate – (CC R&D HR)

1 Comment

As per the reply in Parliament ( LOK SABHA) against UNSTARRED QUESTION NO 596, ANSWERED ON 09.12.2013, the total 487 scientists left from DRDO from 2008 to 30th November 2013. Scientist B- 289, Scientist C- 152, Scientist D – 26, Scientist E-  13, Scientist F – 7.

Why they left – Financial reasons – very few, most young scientists join this great premier scientific organization with great enthusiasm that they will contribute their best to serve the nation, but unfortunately they encounter incompetent, greedy, bosses who got these higher posts on the basis of flattering/corruption /nepotism.

Examples are numerous but this is one real reason “I grew up in a small town called ———— and my father works for ——. All my childhood I spent in scientific community and I dreamt of becoming a scientist one day. I did that and I ignored offers from private sector and Joined DRDO.

The establishment that I joined promised me excellent work in my field of analysis and designing. At 21, I joined and things of course were very indifferent to what I dreamt of.

We had bureaucracy and people were not happy. The organization was something like a hierarchy controlled rather than intellectual oriented. I had an excellent team and my STA’s are one of the best. People never cared to harness their potential. Have no idea why.

Most of the works that we were supposed to do were outsourced; this is one thing that I fought with everybody. I did not want to work for my salary; I wanted to work for pleasure.

Finally, my team was able to deliver some engineering marvels that my superiors said it was impossible to do. My growing frustration with outsourcing was a big issue for me. A single step ahead in the project is like fighting with in.

After 5 years of service, I came to US to pursue my further studies.”

The absolute power to Lab Directors is also a big reason to derail the organizations.

The training of young scientist started with collecting quotations, making specifications, filing indents of not required instruments & items on direction of their bosses to get good APAR and promotions. If the scientist not compromise with his integrity for helping out the corruption of his bosses and Director, then immediately his harassment started by all means including transfers.

One scientist from GTRE, Bangalore genuinely approached the Director for his transfer but the egoist Director after receiving transfer order from DRDO Hqrs told him “ I will see who is going to relieve you if you pressurized me. Your dead body only can only be relieved” It is not a joke and this is the real scenario of DRDO.

The individual  ask transfer without having GOD father in DRDO always get same treatment, his carrier start spoiling by Lab Directors, if Lab Directors is annoyed with any individual of lab means he will going to face social boycott by  whole lab because one try to help him means he will also come under threat zone. Targeted individual start facing each and every step of his day to day work like NO TD, No support for project work, no recommendation for good work, APAR/ACR dropped to average and many more obstacles are common.

If Lab Director sniff that the individual is watching corruption or raising voice for that, it means that that individual is now going to get a kick without following the rules to remotest area with instruction that make sure that this man does not get peace at all.

DRDO has an unwritten thumb rule that when any Lab Director is not happy with any individual it means that he must be transferred to other destination without justifying the reason and the best part of this is that entire DRDO HQRS backsthat egoist corrupt director. This has resulted in the DRDO we know today.

All 25 questions raised by the Cabinet/PMO / Parliament Committee are really the honest approach to make DRDO a productive organization. DRDO is wasting more than two lakh crores worth of infrastructure without any mentionable output. DRDO should accept Genral Mallik’s comment after KARGIL WAR “casualties in the conflict could have been reduced had the Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO) not come in the way.”

Unfortunately, DRDO still does not understand the importance of the country’s needs. It still wastes money on SDR type of technologies, which already exist, and DRDO is ready to give second extension for PDC, like Sh R C Agarwal, who got a second extension without output.

It is requested DRDO Hqrs now Modi Ji giving full opportunity to save and grow DRDO in real means, अब तो जागो औरभ्रष्टाचार, भाई भतीजावाद, अयोग्य लोगो को आगे बढ़ाने का कार्य बंद करो।  देश के विकास की और देखो।  जय हिन्द 

DR Gausal Khan’s, DIPAS representation also throws light of DRDO culture please go through the following pages.

Page - 1
Page – 1
Page - 2
Page – 2
Page -3
Page -3
Drdo

RTI – Cabinet- Shri Avinash Chander’s service extension

4 Comments
To                                                                                                   Date 30th October 2014
Shri Rajesh Nagpal,
Under Secretary, 
Central Public Information Officer,
ACC Cell, Cabinet Secretariat,
Sardar Patel Bhawan,
New Delhi – 110004

 

Hello,

Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005 in respect of DOPT OM No.  No. 26012/6/2002-Estt. (A) dated 9th December, 2002, No. 26012/8/2011-Estt. (A) dated 16th May, 2011, 26012/15/2010-Estt(A-IV) dated 4th May 2011 [DPRC] , 26012/15/2010-Estt(A-IV) dated 4th May 2011 [Screening Committee]and F.No.22/35/2011-E0 (SM.II) dated 24/26 September, 2014.

Shri Avinash Chander , Distinguished Scientist ,DRDO , Min. of Defence was given extension beyond after his superannuation from age of 62 -64 years with effect from 01 Dec 2012 to 30 Nov 2014 by approval of DPRC of DRDO, Screening Committee headed by Cabinet Secretary and Appointments Committee of the Cabinet.

Under the provisions of FR 56(d) the scientist considered for extension from age of 62-64 years should have “International Stature“. Copy of DOPT OM dt 16 May 2011 is enclosed.

  1. Provide copy of Minute Sheet & File Noting for extension in service of Shri Avinash Chander, for age of 62-64 years by the Appointments Committee of the Cabinet.
  2. The copy of bio-data of Shri Avinash Chander in prescribed Performa submitted to DPRC, Screening Committee and ACC.(Proforma for sending proposals for approval of Department of Personnel & Training for grant of extension to Government servants beyond the age of superannuation)
  3. The attributes, achievements and documentary evidenceson record of Shri Avinash Chander based on which DPRC, Screening Committee & ACC considered Shri Avinash Chander a Scientist with “International Stature” and approved his extension.
  4. The DPRCs justification for such extension based on merits of the case, the international stature of the person recommended and also indicate whether thiswill block promotion opportunities of others in the Department.
Regards
Prabhu  Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun
Ph   0135 2787750, Mobile 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website   www.corruptionindrdo.com

Registration Number           CABST/R/2014/60418

Drdo

भारतीय मुसलमान देश के लिए जिएगा और देश के लिए ही मरेगा: प्रधानमंत्री नरेंद्र मोदी

5 Comments
माननीय श्री नरेंद्र मोदी जी                                                                  दिनाक 29 अक्टूबर  2014
प्रधानमंत्री
कक्षसंख्या  152 पीएमओ
साउथ ब्लाक  नईदिल्ली -110011
 

विषय : डीआरडीओ के वैज्ञानिक डा. गोसाल खान  के साथ भेद भाव पूर्ण कार्यवाही के सन्दर्भ में

माननीय श्री प्रधानमंत्री जी  आपने देश को एक महत्वपूर्ण सन्देश दिया “भारतीय मुसलमान देश के लिए जिएगा और देश के लिए ही मरेगा ” यह सन्देश डीआरडीओ के कुछ  मठाधीशो को समझ नहीं आया और वो लोग अपनें अहम के खातिर किसी भी शख्स का उत्पीड़न करने से बाज नहीं आ रहे है।  वैसे तो इन सब उत्पीड़न कार्यो की बहुत  लम्बी लाइन है जो की आपको डीआरडीओ में चल रहे कोर्ट केसो की संख्या देखते ही पता चल जाएगी परन्तु डा. गोसाल खान  का मामला सीधे सीधे आपके सन्देश की डीआरडीओ द्वारा अवेहलना है। 

डा. गोसाल खान  पश्चिम बंगाल के छोटे से गांव के रहने वाले हैं और अपनी योग्यता व् लगनशीलता के कारण कोलकत्ता से उच्च शिक्षा ग्रहण की व् अमेरिका में रिसर्च करने चले गए परन्तु देश से लगाव  के कारण सात वर्षो पश्च्यात डीआरडीओ वरिष्ठ वैज्ञानिक के पद ग्रहण कर लिया। अमेरिका में रहते हुए उनकी दो पुत्रियों का जन्म हुआ और व् स्वत ही अमेरिका की नागरिक बन गयी। और  डा. गोसाल खान कभी भी अमेरिका में बस सकते हैं  पर इन सब बातो के बाउजूद डा. गोसाल खान डीआरडीओ में मेहनत से अपने रिसर्च में लगे रहे व् कई रिसर्च पेपर पब्लिश करे, कई अवार्ड्स प्राप्त करे व् नयी पीढ़ी के योग्य पात्रो को पी एच डी करा रहे है।

डा. गोसाल खान  द्वारा लिखे एक रिसर्च पेपर को जापान की एक संस्था ने “Developing World Scientist Award” के लिए चयनित किया तो उनके निदेशक महोदया डा. शशिबाला सिंह  ने अनपेक्षित कारणों डा. गोसाल खान विरुद्ध मोर्चा खोल दिया और अंतत अपने भ्राता श्री ए के सिंह (निदेशक कार्मिक) की मदद से उन्हें एक न्यायविस्र्द्ध चार्ज शीट दे दी गयी।

डा. शशिबाला सिंह व् श्री ए के सिंह  का यह कृत्य श्री अविनाश चन्दर, वैज्ञानिक सलाहकार  की छत्र छाया में देश हित की अनदेखी,  जापान में देश की छवि दूषित करने का  प्रयास है।

रही बात डा. गोसाल खान  की उनको इस उत्पीड़न ने  लाइफ साइंस वैज्ञानिक से कानून का विद्यार्थी बनने में मजबूर कर दिया।

डा. गोसाल खान ने अपने उत्पीड़न के सन्दर्भ में  अल्प संख्यक आयोग को भी पत्र लिखा पर डीआरडीओ के दिग्गजों ने एक असंवैधानिक समिति (समिति में कोई भी अल्प संख्यक सदस्य नहीं था)  का गठन कर उलटे डा. गोसाल खान  के विरुद्ध विभागीय कार्यवाही की संस्तुति कर दी।

माननीय श्री प्रधानमंत्री जी आपको जानकार हैरानी होगी पिछले कुछ सालो में डीआरडीओ के वैज्ञानिक, तकनीकी अधिकारी, कर्मचारियों  ने  इतने संख्या में  कोर्ट केस करे जितने की  डीआरडीओ ने आज तक प्रोजेक्ट नहीं करे होंगे।  डीआरडीओ पिछले दस सालो  में कोर्ट केसो में खर्च किये कुल रूपये से एक देश को नया प्रोडक्ट मिल सकता था।

ये सब  वैज्ञानिको को प्रशासनिक कार्यो में नियुक्त करना है जब वैज्ञानिक विज्ञानं छोड़ प्रशासनिक कार्यो करने लगता है तो वह सत्ता शक्ति का शिकार होकर इस प्रकार के उत्पीड़न कार्य करता है और पूरा संस्थान अपने लक्ष्य से भटक जाता है।

अतः आपसे अनुरोध है कि डा. गोसाल खान को भारत में रहने के लिए आपके अविलंब हस्तक्षेप की आवश्यकता है। अन्यथा डीआरडीओ के सिंह  बंधू जोकि  श्री अविनाश चन्दर, वैज्ञानिक सलाहकार के  वरद हस्त से रक्षित है  डा. गोसाल खान को इतना प्रताड़ित करेंगे की डा.खान को वापस अमेरिका भागना पड़ेगा। अभी तो सिर्फ अपनी सैलरी से हज़ारो रूपए खर्च कर कोर्ट के चकर काट रहे है और विज्ञानं छोड़ कानून की किताब पड़ रहे है। पर कब तक ?

धन्यवाद

 

प्रभु डंडरियाल
21-सुंदरवाला, रायपुर, देहरादून
फ़ोन  0135- 2787750, मोबाइल – 9411114879,
e-मेल  id prabhudoon@gmail.com  वेबसाइट  www.corruptionindrdo.com
 
dr khandr khan1dr khan2
Drdo

एरीज के पूर्व निदेशक समेत दो को भेजा जेल

Leave a comment

नैनीताल स्थित आर्यभट्ट प्रेक्षण विज्ञान शोध संस्थान में 2008 में हुए इंजीनियर भर्ती घोटाले का मामला

संवाद सहयोगी, देहरादून: नैनीताल स्थित आर्यभट्ट प्रेक्षण विज्ञान शोध संस्थान(एरीज) में वर्ष 2008 में हुए इंजीनियर भर्ती घोटाले के आरोपी संस्थान के पूर्व निदेशक राम सागर ने मंगलवार को सीबीआइ के विशेष न्यायाधीश अमित सिरोही की अदालत में आत्मसमर्पण कर दिया। उनके साथ एक अन्य आरोपी टॉर स्टील रिसर्च इंस्टीट्यूट ऑफ इंडिया दिल्ली के मुख्य सलाहकार अभियंता (चीफ कंसल्टिंग इंजीनियर) एएल संधल ने भी अदालत में समर्पण किया। अदालत ने दोनों को 14 दिन की न्यायिक अभिरक्षा में जेल भेज दिया। घोटाले में कुल पांच आरोपी हैं।

वर्ष 2008 में संस्थान की ओर से इंजीनियर ‘बी’ के पदों पर भर्ती के लिए विज्ञापन निकाले गए थे। इन पदों पर कुल 23 अभ्यर्थियों ने आवेदन किया था। संस्थान इंजीनियर ‘बी’ पदों पर तो कोई चयन नहीं किया, अलबत्ता इंजीनियर ‘सी’ पद पर एक भर्ती कर दी। इस भर्ती में उन पर भाई-भतीजावाद का आरोप लगाते हुए नैनीताल निवासी डीएन भट्ट व अल्मोड़ा निवासी नीरज नयाल ने हाई कोर्ट में जनहित याचिका दायर की।

इस पर अदालत ने पहले केंद्रीय सतर्कता आयोग को जांच के आदेश दिए। बाद में आयोग की जांच से असंतुष्ट हो मामला सीबीआइ को सौंप दिया। मामला सामने आने पर रामसागर निदेशक पद से हटा दिया गया। सीबीआइ ने नौ मई 2013 को न्यायालय में संस्थान के निदेशक राम सागर निवासी 0610, प्रथम ई-क्रास रोड कोरामंगलम बैंगलूरू और टॉर स्टील रिसर्च इंस्टीट्यूट ऑफ इंडिया के अभियंता एएल संधल निवासी मकान नंबर 01, हौज खास नई दिल्ली समेत पांच आरोपियों के खिलाफ अदालत में आरोप पत्र दाखिल किया। तब से आरोपियों को पेश होने के लिए नोटिस दर नोटिस भेजे जा रहे थे। इसी बीच रामसागर व एएल संधल ने न्यायालय में आत्म समर्पण कर जमानत की अर्जी लगाई। मंगलवार को अदालत ने जमानत अर्जी खारिज कर दी।danik jagran 29 October 2014

Drdo

Pranab Mukherjee, Narendra Modi ask people to use technology to fight corruption

Leave a comment

Press Trust of India | New Delhi October 27, 2014

President Pranab Mukherjee and Prime Minister Narendra Modi today called for making optimum use of modern technology in tackling corruption.

In his message on the beginning of ‘Vigilance week‘ starting today, the President said “use of modern technologies can play an important role in eliminating human interface in service delivery systems.”

Emphasising that it is a collective responsibility of citizen as well government officials to fight corruption, Mukherjee said corruption is a complex problem that needed multi-faceted action.

“One of them is the use of technology that can help promote openness and transparency,” he said and asked people to adopt technology initiatives in combating corruption to maximise benefits.

The Prime Minister stressed on the integrity of public servants. “It is needless to point out that integrity of public servants and transparency in public offices is utmost necessary in making transparent and efficient administration free of corruption,” Modi said.

“I appreciate the CVC’s outreach initiatives and endeavours to combat corruption with optimum use of technology,” he said.

Vice President Hamid Ansari said in his message that eradication of corruption from society is not only a legal obligation but also a moral duty of every Indian.

The vigilance awareness Week will be observed till November 1. The theme of the week is “Combating Corruption – Technology as an enabler“.

Drdo

DRDO MANAGEMENT FOR GODS SAKE LEARN “HALF TRUTH IS MORE DANGEROUS THAN LIE”

4 Comments

Betaal Pachchisi – Vikram Betaal Stories-Most suited for DRDO

Betaal Pachchisi
Betaal Pachchisi

Strange Decision

It was a dark night and there were strange noises from everywhere and voice of the moaning of jackals could be heard. It was raining heavily. Although there was a bad atmosphere kingVikramaditya did not fear a bit. He climbed the tree to bring the corpse down and soon he began to walk with the corpse lying on his shoulder.

The Betaal spoke: “O King , I pity you as you are making untiring efforts without relaxing as if you wish to achieve something. Instead of enjoying a comfortable sleep in your palace you’re still coming after me”.

King didn’t speak anything because any word from his mouth would keep Betaal right back on the tree.

So Betaal starts his story……….

The ruler of Kishanagar, Rajendra, was kind and strong King. He cared about his people very much. After long period of marriage his queen, Prema, gave birth to a beautiful daughter, named Sona. As she was the only child, she enjoyed a lot of freedom. She was clever not only in studies but in the use of the bow and arrow and sword. When she reached marriageable age, her parents began searching for a suitable partner for her. But Sona disagreed to their proposal saying her parents that ,”Father, I want that my husband should be more skilled in all activities and should be overpower, me in fight. So you may make an announcement”. The King Rajendra was very proud to hear about his daughter’s thoughts.

The announcement was made not only in the King’s kingdom but also in the neighboring kingdoms. Thinking that Sona is only a girl many fighters came with thought in the mind that they can easily defeat a girl and she is only child they will get whole kingdom after King Rajendra.

But Sona defeated everyone, and they had to go back disappointed.

She was taking on the suitors one after another, among them was Uday Varma, the prince of Ayodhyapuri. He watched the fight every day, by joining the crowd. He carefully watched how Princess Sona fought and the different strategies she adopted to meet the method of fighting followed by each prince.

Within few days Uday Varma had learnt all her strategies, and the next day he was ready to fight with her he fight too cleverly. Soon Sona was defeated by Uday Varma. When Uday Varma came forward to present himself to the King and queen, King asked Uday Varma from where he had learnt to fight. Uday Varma replied “I have watched all strategies adopted by Sona, by watching her during fight”.

Sona suddenly said to him that “You have defeated me, but I can’t marry you”.

King was surprised by Sona’s decision and asked her “why couldn’t  you marry him?”

Sona turn back to Uday Varma and said “Just think and find the reason”Uday Varma thought something and said . “Yes you are right. I should not marry you.”

The king and queen were surprised that even Uday Varma too accepted Sona’s decision quickly. They were unable to find the reason.The Betaal concluded the story and asked King Vikramaditya,“Why did she say he did not deserve her hand in marriage in spite of his victory over her? Tell me Vikram if you would not speak even if you know the answer you are not a King of Justice”.

Vikram Replied “Betaal Uday Varma had learnt strategies by watching Sona’s strategies while fighting just as someone learn from his teacher and in Bhartiya Sanskruti a teacher cannot marry his student. InBhartiya Sanskruti father, mother and teacher are all like a god. As Sona realized that Uday Varma was first her student and then a suitor and she was not willing to accept that relationship for the purpose of marriage. Uday Varma too thought on the same manner and realized that he could not marry Sona“.

As king spoke a word so Betaal flew back to the tree carrying the corpsealong with him. Vikram with his sword in his hand went after the Betaal once again.

Hope  Betaals of DRDO learn wisdom & morals   of Indian Culture from Vikram Betaal Story Strange Decision of Sona?

Drdo

Prof. (Dr.) M.P. Kaushik Sc. `H’ Director, DRDE’s extension desire

31 Comments
 
माननीय श्रीनरेंद्र मोदी जी                                                                  दिनाक 28 अक्टूबर  2014
प्रधानमंत्री
कक्षसंख्या  152 पीएमओ
साउथ ब्लाक  नईदिल्ली -110011

 

विषय : 60 साल उपरांत सेवा विस्तार के नियम का विभिन्न संस्थानों द्वारा अयोग्य, अक्षम व्यक्तियों की संस्तुति कर दुरूपयोग करने के सन्दर्भ में

माननीय श्री प्रधानमंत्री जी  आपने  इस महत्वपूर्ण विषय में ध्यान देकर इस दुरूपयोग रोकने के लिए आदेश भी दिए परन्तु यह बड़े खेद का विषय है कि कार्मिक विभाग आपके आदेशो को समुचित प्रभाव  से  कार्यान्वित करने में ढीलम ढाल कर रहे।

डीआरडीओ के श्री अविनाश चन्दर, वैज्ञानिक सलाहकार द्वारा अयोग्य, अक्षम व्यक्तियों की संस्तुति करना लगातार जारी है।  डी आर डी ई, ग्वालियर के निदेशक महोदय प्रोफ डा एम पी कौशिक जोकि इस 31 अक्टूबर 2014 को रिटायर हो रहे हैं वह अभी दिल्ली में श्री अविनाश चन्दर के चरण वंदना में लगे है कि किसी भी तरह उनको सेवा विस्तार दिला दे या फिर कोई चेयर, फेलोशिप, कॉन्ट्रैक्ट या कुछ भी दिला दो।

बदले में वो क्या कर सकते है उसकी एक झलक देखिये, एन बी सी वारफेयर के हेड होने के नाते  डा एम पी कौशिक ने एक विदेशी  यंत्र  (ICAD Chempro100i Make: Environics) जोकि विषाक्त केमिकलो का तुरंत  प्रभाव से पता लगा लेता था का आयात करा और उसकी गुणवत्ता को देख कर सेना ने  999 संख्या में 100 करोड़ रुपये की  इस यंत्र की खरीद जोकि  सामान्य  से दुगनी से ज्यादा कीमत थी।  यंत्र की सेना में विदेश से आप्पूर्ति  के बाद पता चला है की यह यंत्र हमारे देश की क्लाइमेट कंडीशन के लिए उपयुक्त नहीं है और काम नहीं कर रहा।

इस यंत्र की बड़ी इतनी संख्या में बड़ी हुई कीमतों में खरीददारी से किसको फायदा मिला और कहां कहां तक बटा यह तो सिर्फ डा एम पी कौशिक ही बता सकते है।

ऐसे लोगो की सेवा विस्तार के लिए संतुस्ती आना ही एक गंभीर बात है।  इस से संस्तुति करने वालो की मंशा व् नियत पर भी सवाल उठता है।

आपकी निरक्षण व् कार्यवाही के लिए कुछ तथ्य सलग्न है।

आशा है की इन तथ्यों की सपूर्ण जाँच करवा कर देश के बहुमूल्य पैसो का दोहन करने वालो के खिलाफ उचित कार्यवाही का जल्द से जल्द जाँच का आदेश देंगे।

 

धन्यवाद
 
प्रभुडंडरियाल
21-सुंदरवाला, रायपुर, देहरादून
फ़ोन  0135- 2787750, मोबाइल – 9411114879,
e-मेल  id prabhudoon@gmail.com  वेबसाइट  www.corruptionindrdo.com

 

Enclosed details: Purchase background of ICAD Chempro 100i,, Make: Environics

Budgetary Price approximately $9,500 

Purchase Price – Rs 100000/- each in bulk purchase                                                (more than $ 16000/each)

Army has purchased instrument ICAD Chempro 100i (Qty: 999 No’s, Make: Environics) against contract nos B/28704/NBC-4C/ICAD/GS/WE-6 Dated 23 Jun 2009 and B/28704/NBC-4C/Option/ICAD/GS/WE-6 dated 26 Mar 2010 for approximately 100 Crore (INR). This instrument detects the chemical warfare agents and is of utmost importance for the defence services. Having cleared the payment after the delivery, it was found that all these instruments failed to perform as per the specification and have technical problems. It is evident from the letter enclosed that performance related issues were raised in Nov 2012 and since then no action has been taken. Few officials are trying to cover up the issue by changing the specification instead of taking 100 Crore back.

As per the information gathered from the sources, these instruments were first purchased by   M P Kaushik from DRDE Gwalior (A DRDO Laboratory and Nodal Agency in Chemical Warfare). Satisfactory working certificate were given to the company and payment was cleared. Later Army gave the contract. It seems that with the help of M P Kaushik few official of army has executed this act.

Environics's reply regarding non function of Chempro100i
Environics’s reply regarding non function of Chempro100i

 

Environics's reply regarding non function of Chempro 100i
Environics’s reply regarding non function of Chempro 100i

chempPro 100 hand held chemical detector

Chemical Warfare Agents result from Chem Pro 110
Technology Evaluation Report Environics USA Inc. ChemPro 100 Hand-Held Chemical Detector By- Tricia Derringer, Thomas Kelly, Dale Folsom, Robert Krile, and Zachary Willenberg, Battelle, 505 King Avenue, Columbus, OH 43201  and Eric Koglin Task Order Project Officer National Homeland Security Research Center Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 944 East Harmon Ave. Las Vegas, NV 89119

mp

 

Drdo

RTI- PMO – Service Extensions

Leave a comment
To                                                                      Date – 27th October 2014
Shri Syed Ekram Rizwi,
Director & Central Public Information Officer,
Prime Minister’s Office,
South Block,
New Delhi – 110011

 

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of OFFICE MEMORANDUM  F.No.22/35/2011-EO (SM.II) 24th September, 2014 Sub: Grant of extension/re-employment to Central Government servants beyond the age of superannuation.  In Para 1 – The ACC has observed that in some of the cases, the Departments are not taking timely action to reconstitute the Departmental Peer Review Committee (DPRC) and are unilaterally extending the service of the officers beyond the age of superannuation without first obtaining approval of the ACC.

  1. Please provide the copy of order issued by PMO for cases of services extensions which found without obtaining approval of ACC.
  2. Please provide the names of individuals with name of respective department who were given extensions without obtaining approval of ACC.
  3. Please provide  the names of  individuals who were retired from service as per Para- 4 of above referred OM – that in absence of specific approval of ACC towards extension of his services beyond the date of superannuation, an officer should stand retired on his date of superannuation.
  4. As per Para- 1 of above referred OM  – (The ACC has observed that in some of the cases, the Departments are not taking timely action to reconstitute the Departmental Peer Review Committee (DPRC) and are unilaterally extending the service of the officers beyond the age of superannuation without first obtaining approval of the ACC.) As per above statement it is  understood that ACC found such cases where individuals were given service extension without getting first obtaining approval of the ACC. Provide the action taken by PMO on these illegal service extensions till date.

Regards

Prabhu  Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur,
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com  website www.corruptionindrdo.com

Enclosed – OFFICE MEMORANDUM  F.No.22/35/2011-EO (SM.II) 24th September, 2014

Registration Number            PMOIN/R/2014/61451

OFFICE MEMORANDUM  F.No.22/35/2011-EO (SM.II) 24th September, 2014

F.No.22/35/2011-EO (SM.II)
Government of India
Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions
Department of Personnel & Training
(Office of the Establishment Officer)
 
North Block, New Delhi
24th September, 2014

OFFICE MEMORANDUM

Sub: Grant of extension/re-employment to Central Government servants beyond the age of superannuation

Attention of all the Ministries/Departments is invited to the Government of India (Transaction of Business) Rules which prescribe that the ACC is the competent authority to decide the cases of extension in service beyond the age of superannuation. Attention is also invited to DoPT’s OM. No. 26012/6/2002-Estt, (A) dated 09.12.2002 on the subject mentioned above laying down instructions/criteria for grant of extension in service to the categories of personnel referred in proviso to F.R. 56(d). The ACC has observed that in some of the cases, the Departments are not taking timely action to reconstitute the Departmental Peer Review Committee (DPRC) and are unilaterally extending the service of the officers beyond the age of superannuation without first obtaining approval of the ACC.

2. It has also been observed that Ministries/Departments often submit proposals late to the EO Division as a result of which submission of cases for consideration of the ACC also gets delayed.

3. In view of the above, all the Scientific Ministries/Departments are hereby advised to take timely action for constitution of the DPRC for considering the cases for extension of service of specialists in medical or scientific fields, beyond the normal date of superannuation and ensure that proposals seeking approval of the ACC be invariably submitted at least two months in advance of the date of superannuation.

4. It is also reiterated that in absence of specific approval of ACC towards extension of his services beyond the date of superannuation, an officer should stand retired on his date of superannuation and under no circumstances should the Ministry/Department concerned extend his services beyond superannuation unilaterally without the approval & ACC.

sd/-

(Anand Madhukar)

Director (ACC)