Category Archives: Drdo

Drdo

RTI-DRDO-PMO

1 Comment
 To                                                                      Date – 21 October 2014
Shri Syed Ekram Rizwi,
Director & Central Public Information Officer,
Prime Minister’s Office,
South Block,
New Delhi – 110011

Hello,
Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect of following complaints/representations  to Hon’ble Prime Minister with details as under.

  1. DEEMED SUSPENSION OF DR. G. MALKONDIAH, DS AND CCR&D (HR), DRDO AS under the provisions of Rule 10(2)(b) of CCS(CCA) Rules 1965, dated 06 Oct 2014
  2. Shri Avinash Chander SA to RM , DG DRDO, Secretary (DRD) patronizing organized corruption in procurement by Dr. A. K. Saxena, Director, DMSRDE, DRDO, Kanpur, Dated 13 September 2014
  3. CORRUPTION IN DMSRDE (DRDO), KANPUR BY DR. ARVIND KUMAR SAXENA, DIRECTOR, dated 11 September 2014
  4. Non-Implementation of DOPT, Govt. of India, Office Memorandums regarding submission of IPR and put the same in Public Domain in Defence Research & Development Organisation, Min. of Defence, dated 28 July 2014
  5. DRDO Corruption – Modus Operandi example prevailing corruption in DRDO labs, dated 11 June 2014
  6. The Appointment Committee of the Cabinet appointed Sh. Avinash Chander on contract basis, dated 27 May 2014
  1. Provide the present status of the complaints.
  2. Action taken by PMO on the complaint.
  3. If any reply received by PMO on subject matter from respective matters from ministry of Defence or directly from DRDO please provide the copy of replies.
Regards
Prabhu Dandriyal
21-Sunderwala, Raipur
Dehradun-248008
Phone 0135- 2787750, Mobile- 9411114879,
e-mail id prabhudoon@gmail.com, website www.corruptionindrdo.com

Registration Number     PMOIN/R/2014/61418

 
Drdo

डीआरडीओ से एक और घिनौना चेहरा, डीआरडीओ के उच्चतम पदो में आसीन वैज्ञानिको को देशहित से ज्यादा परिवार हित नजर आता है

Leave a comment

swati news

डीआरडीओ से एक और महिला वैज्ञानिक की छुट्टी

अरुणेश पठानिया

देहरादून। नियमों को ताक पर रख डीआरडीओ में हुई भर्ती के मामले में एक और महिला वैज्ञानिक पर गाज गिरी है। महिला वैज्ञानिक की दस वर्ष पुरानी नियुक्ति डीआरडीओ ने समाप्त कर दी है।

फर्जीवाड़े का खुलासा होने के बाद यह दूसरी वैज्ञानिक हैं जिसकी सेवाएं समाप्त की गई हैं। इससे पहले जून में एक निदेशक की पत्नी वैज्ञानिक (एफ) टी चंद्रा बानु की सेवाएं समाप्त की गई थी। डीआरडीओ ने अधिकारिक तौर पर सेवाएं समाप्त करने की पुष्टि की। डीआरडीओ में वैज्ञानिकों की नियुक्तियों में वरिष्ठ अधिकारियों की ओर से अपनी बेटी, पत्नी और रिश्तेदारों को तरजीह देने और इसके लिए नियमों को दरकिनार करने का खुलासा नवंबर 2013 में सेंट्रल विजलेंस कमीशन ने किया था। सीवीसी की रिपोर्ट में तीन महिला वैज्ञानिकों की नियुक्ति में अपनाई प्रक्रिया की जांच की गई, जिनके रिश्तेदार पहले से डीआरडीओ में वरिष्ठ पदों पर तैनात थे। –

  • रक्षा संस्‍थान में मानकों में हेराफेरी कर हुई नियुक्ति का मामला

  • 2004 में हुई थी भर्ती, पिता संस्थान में उच्च पद से हैं रिटायर

  • चार माह पूर्व भी एक महिला वैज्ञानिक की नियुक्ति हुई थी निरस्त

  • सीवीसी की रिपोर्ट में नियुक्तियों में फर्जीवाड़े का हुआ था खुलासा

जून 2014 में डीआरडीओ ने एक निदेशक स्तर के अधिकारी की पत्नी वैज्ञानिक (एफ) टी चंद्रा बानु की सेवाएं समाप्त की थी। उम्र, शैक्षणिक योग्यता, अनुभव के नियमों में रियायत देकर बानु को वर्ष 2008 में साइंटिस्ट एफ पद पर नियुक्ति दी गई थी। अब संस्थान से वरिष्ठ पद से रिटायर हुए वैज्ञानिक की बेटी स्वाति श्रीवास्तव की सेवाएं समाप्त कर दी गई है। वर्ष 2004 में जिस विषय के वैज्ञानिक की तैनाती होनी थी उसमें हेरफेर कर जो डिग्री स्वाति के पास थी उसी के आधार पर नियुक्ति दी गई। अभी मामले में कुछ और वरिष्ठ वैज्ञानिकों के रिश्तेदारों पर कार्रवाई हो सकती है। डीआरडीओ के प्रवक्ता डा. रवि गुप्ता ने बताया कि वैज्ञानिक स्वाति श्रीवास्तव की नियुक्ति समाप्त कर दी है। हालांकि उन्होंने हटाए जाने के कारण स्पष्ट नहीं किए।

सीबीआई जांच की हो चुकी है सिफारिश ः डीआरडीओ में वैज्ञानिकों की भर्ती में धांधली पर तत्कालीन रक्षा मंत्री एके एंटनी ने नवंबर 2013 में सीबीआई जांच की सिफारिश की थी। सीवीओ की जांच रिपोर्ट के बाद डीआरडीओ में रिक्रूटमेंट एसेसमेंट सेंटर (आरएसी) के माध्यम होने वाली भर्ती पर सवाल खड़े हो गए हैं। इस रिपोर्ट को मंत्रालय को सौंप दिया गया है, जिसके बाद सीबीआई जांच के आदेश रक्षा मंत्री ने दिए हैं। मामले में डीआरडीओ के दो पूर्व प्रमुख सहित कुछ वरिष्ठ वैज्ञानिकों पर चहेतों को नियुक्ति देने में नियमों को दरकिनार करने का आरोप है।

Drdo

Scraps the promotions for Scientist ‘F’ to Scientist ‘G’ in DRDO year 2011

11 Comments
To
Hon’ble
Shri Narendra Modi
Prime Minister of India
PMO, South Block
New Delhi-110011

  Subject: Scraps the promotions for Scientist ‘F’ to Scientist ‘G’ in DRDO year 2011

Hon’ble Sir,

  1. Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO) is an organisation under MOD having annual budget of Rs. 15000 crore for FY 2014-2015. This organisation is having about 7500 scientists under DRDS cadre who are comprising of more than 50 scientific disciplines and working in their respective area based on his qualification and discipline.
  2. Prior to the formation of the Recruitment & Assessment Centre(RAC) in DRDO the  recruitments and promotions of scientists in DRDO were made by UPSC. Later on Government of India allowed DRDO to have its own recruitment & assessment body for recruitment and assessment of scientists under DRDS cadre. Consequently an in-house Recruitment & Assessment Centre (RAC) was created in DRDO in 90’s. RAC  conducts recruitment of scientists in DRDO and assessment of scientists for promotion from the grade of Scientist ‘B’ to Scientist ‘H’.
  3. All scientists of DRDO comes under the Defence Research & Development Services(DRDS) cadre and under the provisions of Article 309 of Constitution of India, Government of India framed The Defence Research & Development Service Rules 1979 (DRDS Rules 1979) as Recruitment & Promotion Rules for DRDS cadre.
  4. DOPT, GOI framed Flexible Complementing Scheme (FCS) for faster promotions of scientists working in all S&T Department/Organisations under Central Government. Consequently from past 35 years DOPT issued various OM & Notifications for FCS from IIIrd CPC to VIth CPC.
  5. The OM No. 2/41/97-PICdated 9th Nov 1998  and OM No. AB-1401713712008-Estt(RR)dated 10th September, 2010issued by DOPT are umbrella notifications for FCS.
  6. Vide SRO  11(E) dated 10th August 1990, FCS was introduced in DRDS Rules 1979 and under the provisions of Rule 8(2)(a) of DRDS Rules 1979 it clearly mentioned that promotions from the rank Scientist ‘B’ to Scientist ‘H’ (Outstanding Scientist) are covered under the FCS. Copy of the Rule 8(2)(a) is annexed as Annexure-1.
  7. In DRDO scientists are recruited based on the requirement of various Lab/Estt which were sent to RAC through DRDO HQ and then RAC recruits the scientists based on their discipline, qualifications, experience and other requirement as sought by Labs/Estt of DRDO.
  8. Under the provisions of OM No.AB-1401713712008-Estt(RR)  dated 10th September, 2010of DOPT the promotions under FCS are applicable to the scientist who are working in S&T organisation/department and involved in Scientific &Technological  work. Scientists/ Technical experts doing management/ administrative work in the Ministries should not be considered for up gradation under FCS, they should only be given benefit of up gradation under MACP. Copy of page no. 06 of the OM annexed as Annexure-2.
  9. Procedure of promotion from grade of Scientist ‘F’ to Scientist ‘G’ till 2010 were followed as provided under Rule 8(2)(a) of DRDS Rules 1979 and the same procedure supposed to be followed  in 2011 for promotions from grade of Scientist ‘F’ to Scientist ‘G’but the RAC, DRDO  adopted the new procedure illegally without amending the DRDS Rules 1979 by issuing SRO under the provisions of Article 309 of the Constitution.
  10. DRDS Rules 1979 clearly stipulates that  DRDS Rules can be amended only by issuing an SRO under Article 309 of the Constitution of India. DRDO violated the Article 309 by implementing interview/interaction in promotion of scientist ‘F’ to scientist ‘G’ grade in 2011 without proper amendment in SRO.
  11. In this matter Dr. A.K. Singh, Scientist ‘G’ (then Director, DHRD) issued letter No. DHRD/76145/C/M/01 dated 21 March 2011 on the Subject ” Assessment of Sc ‘F’ for promotion- revised procedure of” to Director, RAC. Copy of the letter dated 21 March 2011 is annexed as Annexure-3.
  12. Dr. A.K. Singh issued the said letter illegally  without issuing of any SRO in the subject matter as in the year 2011 Dr. A.K. Singh himself was appearing in assessment as candidate for promotion from  grade of Scientist ‘F’ to Scientist ‘G’ and wanted to be get benefitted by the said new procedure for assessment.
  13. Based upon the letter of Dr. A.K. Singh dated 21 March 2011, Dr. P.S. Goel, then Chairman, RAC issued his DO letter No. RAC/01/Assessment/PSG, dated 22 March 2011 regarding “Promotions for grade of Scientist ‘F’ to Scientist ‘G”. Copy of the letter dated 22 March 2011 is annexed as Annexure-4.[How quickly the letter by Dr. P.S. Goel was issued on 22 March 2011, this establish planned conspiracy]
  14. Dr. P. S. Goel and Dr. A.K. Singh planned whole conspiracy of the said illegal assessment in the year 2011 in DRDO with help of then Dr. V.K. Saraswat then DGR&D, DRDO.
  15. Dr. P.S. Goel introduced this illegal mechanism to give favour to few incompetent DRDO scientists and for this act in return he got Prof. MGKMenon Chair, RCI, Hyderabad which fed him 84 lakhs per year. It is pure kick back or DRDO should provethe justification of his appointment. Dr. A.K. Singh himself promoted in the year 2011 by misusing this illegal mechanism for assessment in the year 2011.
  16. There was noassessment interview requirement for promotion from scientist ‘F’ to  scientist ‘G’ as per the DRDO service rule-1979-Rule-8(2)(e) till 2011 , but Chairman, Recruitment and Assessment Centre (RAC) of DRDO forwarded name before promotion committee after “ INTERACTION ’’ .
  17. The SRO No. 21 for the amending DRDS Rules 1979 was published in official gazette of Government of India on 23 March 2012. Copy of the SRO 21 dated 23 March 2012 is annexed as Annexure-5.
  18. The list of Scientist ‘F’ that were illegally promoted to  Scientist ‘G’in the year 2011 is annexed asAnnexure-6.
  19. Sir , all these promotion from grade of scientist ‘F’ to  scientist ‘G’ in the year 2011 were illegal and liable to be scrapped as it amounts corruption , nepotism and misuse of power for personal gain by Dr. A.K. Singh being Director, DHRD who issued illegal letter dated 21 March 2011.Therefore promotion of Dr. A.K. Singh, Scientist ‘G’ , Director of Personnel should be quashed/scrapped and through investigation in the matter may be ordered to give justice to the all affected Scientist ‘F’ of DRDO and fix the accountability of the corrupt culprits in the matter.

Regards PrabhuDandriyal, 21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun -248008 0135- 2787750, 9411114879, prabhudoon@gmail.com www.corruptionindrdo.com ANNEXURES-

  1. Copy of the Rule 8(2)(a) , DRDS Rules 1979
  2. Page no. 6 of OM No. AB-1401713712008-Estt(RR)  dated 10th September, 2010
  3. Copy of the letter dated 21 March 2011 issued by Director, DHRD, DRDO
  4. Copy of the letter dated 22 March 2011 issued by Chairman, RAC, DRDO
  5. Copy of the SRO 21 dated 23 March 2012.
  6. The list of Scientist ‘F’ that were illegally promoted to Scientist ‘G’ in the  2011
Drdo

Conspiracy and propaganda for reverse technology transfer to USA by forged TOT of EDK by DRDO under guidance of Shri Avinash Chander, DGR&D, DRDO and SA to RM, Secretary, DRD

3 Comments
To                                                       
Hon’ble
Shri Narendra Modi
Prime Minister of India
PMO, South Block
New Delhi-110011

 

Subject: Conspiracy and propaganda for reverse technology transfer to USA by forged TOT of EDK by DRDO under guidance of Shri Avinash Chander, DGR&D, DRDO and SA to RM, Secretary, DRD

Sir,

  1. HEMRL, Pune is one of the establishments of DRDO working on R&D of High Energy Materials and it developed the technology of EDI. DRDO patented the technology of Explosive Detection & Identification through Indian Patent Office by Patent Application No 524/DEL/1996 dated 12-Mar-1996 for

“A PROCESS FOR EXPLOSIVE DETECTION AND IDENTIFICATION”.

The patent granted vide patent no 238663 dated 16 Feb 2010.

As per GOI website Inventors of the said patent were RABINDRA KUMAR SINHA, USHA DEVI RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, HIRA LAL YADAV and JAMAN SINGH GHARIA    .

Copy of Patent is enclosed as Annexure-I

Astonishing fact is that HEMRL falsely credited Ms Reny M Roy, Scientist C as innovator of EDK vide their letter No HEMRL/TS/3341 dated 8 March 2010. Copy of the letter is enclosed as Annexure-II.

  1. DRDO signed licensing agreement for explosive detection kit with an Indian company, Vantage Integrated Security Solutions, Noida. The company basically working in area of CCTV, they import in kit form and assemble in Noida, no any connection in explosive, basically the company is instrumental for EDK propaganda because of  Mr Panrav Verma’s (Owner) close proximity with corrupt DRDO officials who are using this company for CCTV applications for all over DRDO labs.Company’s website is self explanatory http://www.vantagesecurity.com/.
  1. The expose of special audit by CGDA in 2012  jolted DRDO in each and every level subsequently Dr V K Sarswat, DG DRDO failed to get further extension and relived on 31st May. Indian media criticized the misadventures of DRDO corrupt practises especially by top scientists.
  1. To divert the attention of country and media as well as politicians Sh Avinash Chander made big international propaganda of EDK Reverse Technology Transfer to US which was already signed MOU between then HEMRL, Pune’s Director, Dr. Subhanadnanda Rao and Mrs Fay Crow, President of Crow & Crow Co, on 25th April 2011. Copy enclose as evidence.
  1. Crowe and Company, LLC, a woman-owned, very small LLC, registered in   SUMMERVILLE, South Carolina in 20th November 2007, net base company as per company website crowderscustomizing.com involve in business of car accessories, marketing & management consultancy. As per data available in internet the company turnover only $ 100000 only has two employees etc.
  1. DRDO designed a high profile drama involved Indian Embassy, Washington, DC US chamber of commerce, FICCI, India to fool the country.
  1. DRDO wasted lakhs of lakhs Rupees organised lunch for 1000 people, DRDO team under leadership of Sh Avinash Chander consisting more than 12 persons visited US, then Indian Ambassador Mrs Nirupama Rao gave dinner party for these DRDO team and Fay Crowe team.
  1. Interestingly such big defence organisation of India signed second time same MOU with Mrs Fay Crowe, CEO who was present there with her mother, sister and daughter. India’s achievement was the photo session of Sh Avinash Chander only.
  1. Explosive Detection & Identification (EDK) is nothing but as usual bluff of DRDO, because DRDO is mastering in bluffing the country and the KARGIL War was the eye opener for the country. But because of lack in vision of UPA government corrective measure not taken and DRDO got liberty to fool the country.
  2. Again DRDO trying to lipapoti on EDK by sending again to US Ms Reny M Roy, Scientist C and one Technical Officer Mr Satish Nayak to do some gimmick with Ms Fay Crowe and waste some precious poor tax payer money
  3. The enclosed documents, photographs, news paper clips are self explanatory of this conspiracy of DRDO.
  4. The justification of this exercise from DRDO is need not important because whole world now knows the bluff of DRDO team this game was done only to distract the attention of media and public from DRDO failures, corruptions and CVC, CVO investigations.

It is requested a thorough investigation may be ordered to stop this kind of misadventure by DRDO, because of this country will face embarrassment situation of our country in international platform.

Regards

PrabhuDandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun -248008
0135- 2787750, 9411114879,
prabhudoon@gmail.com www.corruptionindrdo.com

Enclosed :

  1. DRDO documents available in respect of EDK
  2. Information on Internet available regarding Mrs Fay Crow and his company
  3.   News paper clips regarding EDK MOU national and International
Drdo

Poor HR of DRDO- The Great Nuclear Medicine Scientist Dr. A.K. Singh posted as Director of Personnel at DRDO HQ

39 Comments
To                                                                                                       Date 16th October 2014
Hon’ble
Shri Narendra Modi,
Prime Minister of India,
Room No -152, PMO, South Block,
New Delhi-110011
 

Subject : Request to   utilized scientific potential of Dr. A.K. Singh, DOP, DRDO HQ to Lab/Estt under Life Sciences Cluster 

Hon’ble Sir,

Human Resource is an asset of an organisation and proper utilisation and deployment of its HR/Manpower is challenging job for an organisation especially on DRDO which holding very significant responsibility for the nation. In the past several years   DRDO cannot meet its target well within time and seeking extensions in PDC again & again in several major projects of national significance. This drawback of DRDO has been noticed by Hon’ble Ex-PM Dr. Manmohan Singh, Ex- Defence Minister Shri A.K. Antony, CAG, CGDA, Parliamentary Standing Committee on Defence (15th Lok Sabha). This has been also noticed and criticised by you in DRDO Award Function on 20th August 2014 by saying “Chalta Hai wala attitude nahin chalega“.

Poor HR planning and deployment of scientists in various Lab/Estt of DRDO is major reason for not delivering the products and timely completion of project. Almost each and every lab/Estt all sundry work (Admin/Stores/Security/MTO/Library/works/ conservancy etc) are managed by qualified scientist and technical officials (more than 15% of total strength of DRDO) Simultaneously they are drawing all perks which is provided towards incentive in the name of scientific encouragement and also enjoying flexible complementary scheme on promotions which is also strictly for those who dedicatedly involve in scientific and technical assignments.

HR of DRDO comes under CCR&D (HR) which consisted of DOP, DHRD, RAC, CEPTAM, DESIDOC, ITM, MILIT, DIAT, DPI and RTI Cell. Presently Dr. G. Malakondiah, Distinguished Scientist is holding the charge of CCR&D (HR) and he was convicted by Madras High Court for imprisonment of three weeks in case of contempt of court this the highest example of ignorance of constitutions provision.

One such example of poor HR planning of DRDO is of Dr. A.K. Singh, Director, Directorate of Personnel, DRDO HQ, New Delhi. Dr. A.K.Singh, Scientist ‘G’ is great Nuclear Medicine scientist of India with five patents granted, fourteen patents filed, one copy right and more than fifty publications in international & national journals.Bio-Data of Dr. A.K. Singh is annexed.

As a matter of fact, despite having so many scientific contributions in area of Nuclear Medicines which is primarily used for treatment of cancer, brain tumours and complex diseases.

Dr. A.K. Singh was basically recruited for projects of DRDO in its New Delhi based unique laboratory working in Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Allied Sciences (INMAS). He worked in INMAS till the year 2004 but all of sudden he was transferred in DRDO HQ and assigned non-technical clerical assignments like Staff Officer to CCR&D.

Since the year 2004, the great Nuclear Medicine scientist is working non-scientific work like Director, CEPTAM, Director, DHRD and presently DOP. The work assigned to Dr. A.K. Singh is of administrative nature for which DRDO is having it’s another HR cadre known as administrative cadre and from this cadre manpower should be appointed in DOP.

Being a bonafide life science scientist, Dr. A.K. Singh, DOP not having any expertise in field of HR, therefore, he made several wrong decisions due to which DRDO faces lot of embarrassment and bad fame in media, it also affected various officials of DRDO who are facing several court cases in various courts all over India, even 15th October 2014 he received notice from CAT Delhi for his misadventure towards a senior scientist who belong to minority.  This created lot of expenditure in term of fees to lawyers, TA/DA to attend court cases and cause of derailing scientific research tempo of DRDO.

Government of India is paying more than Rupees twenty lakhs to Dr. A.K. Singh, DOP for his non-productive and non-scientific work that can be carried out by any of the officer of Joint Director/Additional Director of DRDO from the admin cadre. DRDO wasting poor tax payers money.

Dr. A.K. Sigh is great Nuclear Medicine Scientist which is rare in DRDO. The discipline of Dr. A.K. Singh is from Life Sciences so proper utilization of his potential to  posted him in Laboratory/ Establishment of DRDO under Life Sciences Cluster so he can contribute more in the national interest.

There are nine (09) Lab/Estt under Life Sciences Cluster of DRDO spread over all India. These are DEBEL, DIPAS, DIPR, INMAS, DRL, DIBER, DFRL, DIHAR & DRDE. Life sciences scientists are 120+ out of 7500 total DRDO scientist’s strength so proper utilization of these 9 labs can only possible when all life science scientists dedicatedly posted in Life Sciences Cluster of DRDO not in HR related Corporate Directorate. Dr A K Singh qualified life science scientist but he convert his field into technical services in the official records while as per his biodata he is fit for life sciences activities.

Sir you know the maxim “wrong shoe in right leg- “. Similar is the case of Dr. A.K. Singh who has been wrongly posted in HR assignments of DRDO while he is great Nuclear Medicine scientist with international fame scientific contributions in Nuclear Medicine. He is very much required in Lab/Estt of DRDO that are working in specialization of Dr. A.K. Singh like Defence Research Laboratory, Tezpur, Defence Research & Development Establishment, Gwalior, DEBEL, Bangalore and INMAS, New Delhi. Since Dr. A.K. Singh had already worked in INMAS, New Delhi for more than 16 years and his experience was bitter at INMAS thereby he was expelled from projects and scientific assignments at INMAS, New Delhi. Therefore the ,most suitable  work places for getting output from his scientific knowledge and experience is DRL, Tezpur, DRDE, Gwalior and DEBEL, Bangalore.

Keeping in view of the facts stated above, to save public revenue and streamline HR of DRDO, it is very much required that scientists of the DRDO having educational qualification and experiences in life sciences should be posted in Lab/Estt under Life Sciences Cluster of DRDO.

Therefore I kindly and earnestly request you to start “operation clean- Swachta Abhiyan” in DRDO by transferring Dr. A.K. Singh, DOP from DRDO HQ to any of the Life Sciences Cluster Lab/Estt like DRL, Tezpur, DRDE, Gwalior or DEBEL, Bangalore so that poor & dirty  HR of DRDO may be rich & clean.

Regards

Prabhu Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun -248008
0135- 2787750, 9411114879,
prabhudoon@gmail.com www.corruptionindrdo.com             

 

Annexure-

  1. Bio-data of Dr. A. K. Singh, Director, DOP
  2. Corporate Structure of DRDO (Download from DRDO website)

 

 

Dr A K Singh, DOP, DRDO's Biodata
Bio-data of Dr. A. K. Singh, Director, DOP
drdo copr
Corporate Structure of DRDO

 

Drdo

Request for inquiry of fake experience certificate issued from Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Center for Biomedical Research North Campus, Delhi University.

Leave a comment
To                                                                                                  Date – 15th October 2014
Prof. Dinesh Singh,
Vice-Chancellor,
Delhi University,
Delhi -110007

 

Subject:     Request for inquiry of fake experience certificate issued from Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Center for Biomedical Research North Campus, Delhi University.

Reference: RTI reply received from CPIO, DU vide letter No Info/ OA/ 1761/ 2014/ 5294 Dated 30th September 2014

Sir,

Delhi University since its inception is guiding source for all other Indian universities due to its proximity with education ministry, UGC and power center at Delhi.

With passage of time, however, it has been noticed that casual attitude has been taken over and faculties are involve in recruitments in various government organizations as a expert and “very early they have adopted a culture of one man scratch another man back”

The opportunity give Delhi University for collaborating the science and technology with various labs have been diluted when some faculties shows leniency in performing the business which has lowered the image of DU.

One such example of this casual attitude has been surfaced when one senior scientist with ten years service annulled on last Friday 10th October 2014 as the appointment found manipulated and the DU environment biology faculty was participated as a expert for interview of Biotechnology scientist recruitment in RAC, DRDO.

It is astonishing fact that how DU administration allowed environment biology faculty to play role as expert for Biotechnology scientist recruitment and bunch of brilliant biotechnology candidate he selected environmental biology candidate. Basically he was instrumental for the said task but we all believe that no professor will help the corrupt official because rest candidates are also their students.

Another case observed of issuing experience certificate to Mrs S Geetha by Prof. Vani Brahmachari, ACBR. Earlier RTI reply by CPIO, DU clearly send that all six faculties specifically denied that Mrs S Geetha never work in any research project at ACBR including the signatory Prof. Vani Brahmachari.

Recent above reference RTI reply the information given by Prof K Natrajan, Offg, Director, ACBR vide letter no ACBR/14/843 dated 29/30 September 2014 stated that the issued certificate is genuine without furnishing any evidence financial/report/application/ appointment letter etc of Mrs S Geetha which can justify that Mrs S Geetha worked as research assistant for 38 days at ACBR.

It seems Prof K Natrajan, Offg, Director, ACBR not serious about the image of DU and trying to mislead the authorities of HRD ministries. He also not aware the Sh A K Antony already given approval for CBI inquiry on 29th October 2013 reference Notes at 48-55 ante and the observation of JS & CVO at note 56 ante (few pages is enclosed herewith for ready reference)

It is requested for the sake of DU image and for sake of eligible students who study hard to get good job and wish to serve nation but the nexus of corrupts ruins their honest wish, therefore, an authoritative investigation required for the matter pertaining to Mrs S Geetha. It will further stop the casual attitude of faculties and directors of Delhi University to play with future of genuine scholars.

Regards

Prabhu Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun -248008
0135- 2787750, 9411114879,
prabhudoon@gmail.com www.corruptionindrdo.com    

Enclosed.

  1. Experience Certificate issued    by Prof Vani Brahmachari.
  2. Assistant Registrar, Delhi university internal circular 
  3. RTI reply  CPIO,   Delhi university  
  4. CVO, MOD noting few relevant pages  
noting1
CVO, MOD Noting DRDO on recruitment complaint Page 1

   

CVO, MOD Noting DRDO on recruitment complaint page 12
CVO, MOD Noting DRDO on recruitment complaint page 12
CVO, MOD Noting DRDO on recruitment complaint page 13
CVO, MOD Noting DRDO on recruitment complaint page 13
CVO, MOD Noting DRDO on recruitment complaint page 26
CVO, MOD Noting DRDO on recruitment complaint page 26

                     

Drdo

RTI- Delhi University – Mrs S Geetha, Scientist, DIPAS, (D/O Dr W Selvamurthy, Ex – CC R&D) DRDO – Experience Certificate

Leave a comment
 
To                                                                                                     15th October2014
 Ms Meenakshi Sahay,
Assistant Registrar (College –T) & CPIO,
University of Delhi, Delhi – 110007

Hello,

Kindly provide me with the following information requested under the purview of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005 in respect of Original Application (OA) No. 1761 of 2014 under RTI Act 2005. Your reply No.Info/OA/1761/2014/5294 dated 30th September 2014 received on 13th October 2014 as per Postal department the letter dispatched on 9th October 2014. The reply enclosed a letter of Offg. Director, ACBAR in which the information given as below

“ The experience certificate dated 2nd December 2003 issued by the Director, ACBR to Mrs S Geetha clearly indicates that Mrs  S Geetha worked for 38 days at ACBR as Research Assistant. Several short term Research/Teaching Assistants are engaged in the center for various academic activities. Prof. Vani Brahmachari was the Director (Offg) of during 2003 who is also competent authority to issue such certificate to bonafide short terms candidate. The experience certificate dated 2nd December 2003 clearly shows that it was signed by Prof. Vani Brahmachari in her capacity as Director, ACBR although Mrs S Geetha did not work in any of her research project directly which is reflected in the Note sheet dated 9th January 2013 internally circulated among the teachers of the ACBR after gap of ten years from the date of the certificate. Therefore, it is clear that the experience certificate issued by the Director, ACBR is genuine and there is no internal contradiction.”

As per above statement that Prof K Natrajan, Offg, Director, ACBR confirmed that the experience certificate was issued Prof. Vani Brahmchari in the capacity of Offg, Director, ACBR means Mrs  S Geetha was worked as research assistant for period of 38 days in ACBR.

  1. Please provide the official order of competent authority for appointed Prof. Vani Bharmchari as offg, Director, ACBR in 2003.
  2. Provide the period in which Prof. Vani Brahmachari worked as offg, Director, ACBR.
  3. As per Note sheet dated 9th January 2013 all six faculties were denied that Mrs  S Geetha had not worked with them, (I have RTI reply from DU is available ) but unfortunately Offg. Director, ACBAR confidently justifying that the issued experience certificate is genuine means Mrs  S Geetha worked as research assistant in ACBR. Please provide information with whom Mrs  S Geetha worked as research assistant name & designation ,as Prof K Natrajan, Offg, Director, ACBR confirmed the genuineness of experience certificate and must have documentary evidences to prove the authenticity of issued experience certificate.
  4. Please provide the mode of appointment of Mrs  S Geetha like if she applied against any advertisement or she was recommended by someone for research assistant.
  5. Provide the application of Mrs  S Geetha for the post of research assistant at ACBR
  6. Provide Mrs  S Geetha signed any document/ report generated while she worked as research assistant. Hope that as Prof K Natrajan, Offg, Director, ACBR is aware of latest forensic technologies where age of paper/ink can be dated.
  7. The modes of appointment given to research assistant by ACBR.
  8. Mrs  S Geetha mentioned in her application submitted to RAC, DRDO that she received Rs 5000/ month during working as research assistant at ACBR, Please provide the financial terms and condition of ACBR for research assistant and total amount paid to Mrs  S Geetha for 38 days working as remuneration/ Scholarship/salary etc.

Postal order of Rs 10 13F862053 enclosed

Regards

Prabhu Dandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun -248008
0135- 2787750, 9411114879,
prabhudoon@gmail.com www.corruptionindrdo.com             

 

Enclosed

  1. Experience Certificate issued  by Prof Vani Brahmachari.
  2. Assistant Registrar, Delhi university internal circular
  3.  RTI reply  CPIO,   Delhi university  
  4. RTI reply postal track     
    Mrs S Geetha's ACBR RA Certificate
    Mrs S Geetha’s ACBR RA Certificate
    Mrs S-Geetha-case-RTI-reply-by-DU
    Mrs S-Geetha-case-RTI-reply-by-DU

    geetha case rti reply

    geetha case rti reply1

Drdo

Breaking News – Ms Swati Srivastava, Scentist, ‘C’ DIPAS terminated at 5:30 Hrs on Friday 10th October

15 Comments

Ex DOP, Dr Arun Kumar’s daughter Ms Sawti Srivastava, Scientist ‘C’ DIPAS was terminated at 5:30 Hrs on Friday 10th October 2014.

She was recruited through RAC without having eligibility for the post of Scientist ‘B’ in 2004. Dr Arun Kumar was than Director, RAC and manipulated all recruitment rules for secure her appointment for the post of Sc ‘B’

like

the subject advertised for recruitment was Biotechnology but her subject was environment science. For interview call the number of candidates against post ratio was changed temporary to accommodate her name

For interview subject expert was called from Delhi University the faculty of Environmental Science for the post of Biotechnology.

Ultimately after long fight since 2009 with gang of corrupt officials finally the day has come – Satya ki jeet hui ( सत्य की जीत हुई )

Congratulations to Dr Neelam Bhalla, Sc ‘F’,DTRL, Sh Prakash Singh, Senior Admin Officer Grade – II, LASTEC, Dr. Rajiv Chauhan, Dr A K Singh, DOP, DRDO, Media persons, CVC, CVO, MOD for their great effort for clean DRDO from Corrupt officials.

First suspension of Dr Arun Kumar, Ex DOP, DRDO Charge Sheet to Dr S M Veerbhadrapa, Dr A K Tyagi, termination of Mrs T Chandrabanu, Madras High Court punished two top DRDO scientists Dr V K Sarswat , Ex DG, DRDO and Sh.G MALAKONDIAH, CC (R&D), HR, DRDO   with simple imprisonment for a period of three weeks and also pay a fine of Rs.2,000/each

Now count down began for removal of Ms S Geetha, Sc, D, DIPAS for submitting fake experience certificate and Ms Dolly Bansal, Sc ‘C’, DIPR recruited without having proper qualification at the time application date. Dr Snehmani, Sc ‘F’, SASE recruited without meeting eligibility criteria, giving fake inputs at the time of selection of scientist ‘C’ and finally Cmdr S K Patel husband of Ms Tessy Thomas (Agni Putri) who got illegal appointment as Sc ‘G’ and subsequently given post of director within three days by superseding 480+ scientist ‘G’, one of the great achievement of Sh Avinash Chander, DG, DRDO.

मोदी जी अब लगता है कि डी आर डी ओ के अच्छे दिन आ गए। जय हो !जय हो !जय हो !

Drdo

DRDO giving false information to Rashtrapati Sachivalaya (President Secretariat) regarding Transfer and victimization of whistle blower Shri Navin Prakash Gupta of DMSRDE, Kanpur

2 Comments
To
Hon’ble
Shri Pranab Mukherjee
President of India,
Rashtrapati Bhavan
New Delhi – 110011

Subject: DRDO giving false information to Rashtrapati Sachivalaya (President Secretariat) regarding Transfer and victimization of whistle blower Shri Navin Prakash Gupta of DMSRDE, Kanpur

Reference:DOP/05/53123/DMSRDE/M/02 dated 22 Sept 2014 of DOP, DRDO

Hon’ble Sir,

Top management of DRDO is infamous for ill-treat to whistle blowers and officials that belonging to SC/ST and minority community in DRDO. The increasing number court cases, representations to President House, SC/ST commission and minority commission are self explanatory of failure of DRDO HR management

Currently Honorable Madras High Court punishedtwo top DRDO scientists with simple imprisonment for a period of three weeks and also pay a fine of Rs.2,000/each. It clearly shows the DRDO losing day by day its credibility and responsibility towards national goals scientifically & administratively as well as welfare of employees and officers working in the organisation. Sir, you can assume the worst situation of DRDO that the top senior officer Dr. G. Malkondiah who was convicted by Hon’ble Madras High Court is Head of HR Department of DRDO.

With reference to the above cited letter , Shri Navin Prakash Gupta, scientist ‘C’ raised his voice against corruption and send lot of complaints to various agencies including Hon’ble Defence Minister with proof.

The representation send to you by whistle blower Shri Navin Prakash Gupta on 24 July 2014 ,  which subsequently your good office send to DRDO for their comments and with above reference  DRDO send a reply to ShriNavin Prakash Gupta mentioning in

Para -2 “ Competent authority has approved your transfer from DMSRDE, Kanpur to DRL, Tezpur in public interest keeping in the view the exigencies of work. It is neither is punishment nor an act of victimize as you alleged.”

Shri Avinash Chander constituted a fact finding committee and subsequentlytransfer whistle blower ShriNavin Prakash Gupta to DRL, Tezpur without justifying the issue in public interest. The only aim was to save corrupt scientist and message to others beware don’t make noise against his loyal corrupt officials. It is nothing but abuse of power by Shri Avinash Chander, DG, DRDO, who is working in illegal second extension in service after retirement.

Shri Avinash Chander again constituted second fact finding committee to enquire further the corruption charges against Dr. A. K. Saxena, Director, DMSRDE, Kanpur.

Question is why Shri Avinash Chander constituted two fact finding committees, if there was no corruption evidences on record. As DRDO wrote in above reference letter that allegation are baseless. In case the allegations were baseless then why not DRDO disclosed the first FFIC report to whistle blower and sought explanation from him for false complaint to Defence Minister.

THE WHISTLE BLOWERS PROTECTION ACT, 2011, NO. 17 OF 2014 of Parliament received the assent of the President on the 9th May, 2014, and is hereby published for general information on Monday, May 12, 2014.

Under the provisions of sad Act complainant means

(c) “complainant” means any person who makes a complaint relating to disclosure under this Act;

(d) “disclosure means a complaint relating to,—

(i) an attempt to commit or commission of an offence under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988;

(ii) wilful misuse of power or wilful misuse of discretion by virtue of which demonstrable loss is caused to the Government or demonstrable wrongful gain accrues to the public servant or to any third party;

(iii) attempt to commit or commission of a criminal offence by a public servant, made in writing or by electronic mail or electronic mail message, against the public servant and includes public interest disclosure referred to in sub-section (2) of section 4;

Under the provisions of the CHAPTER V- Safeguards against victimisation the Act provide the protection to whistle blowers

PROTECTION TO THE PERSONS MAKING DISCLOSURE

11. (1) The Central Government shall ensure that no person or a public servant who has made a disclosure under this Act is victimised by initiation of any proceedings or otherwise merely on the ground that such person or a public servant had made a disclosure or rendered assistance in inquiry under this Act.

(2) If any person is being victimised or likely to be victimised on the ground that he had filed a complaint or made disclosure or rendered assistance in inquiry under this Act, he may file an application before the Competent Authority seeking redress in the matter, and such authority shall take such action, as deemed fit and may give suitable directions to the concerned public servant or the public authority, as the case may be, to protect such person from being victimised or avoid his victimisation:

(3) Every direction given under sub-section (2) by the Competent Authority shall be binding upon the public servant or the public authority against whom the allegation of victimisation has been proved.

(4) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, the power to give directions under sub-section (2), in relation to a public servant, shall include the power to direct the restoration of the public servant making the disclosure, to the status quo ante.

(5) Any person who wilfully does not comply with the direction of the Competent Authority under sub-section (2), shall be liable to a penalty which may extend up to thirty thousand rupees.

The fact is as vigilant citizen of India I have sent more than one dozen corruption cases with complete proof to CVC and CVC duly register the case and send to CVO, MOD for further investigations against Dr. A.K. Saxena, Director, DMSRDE, Kanpur.

Question No 1–

The meaning of the exigencies:The state or quality of requiring much effort or immediate action,  A pressing or urgent situation, Urgent requirements; pressing needs – This all are bogus the DRL, a life science deserted lab, the Director sitting there also very corrupt, lot of complaints also pending against him. This is only example of abuse of power by Shri Avinash Chander to protect his corrupt colleague. The DRL lab , Tezpur is working in life sciences and where the exigencies of work,

Question No 2-

In DRDO there are more than 7500 scientist are available to Shri Avinash Chander and out of these computer science experts scientist, the 425 scientists are senior to Shri Navin Prakash Gupta and 447 are junior to him, strangely Shri Avinash Chander picked only the whistle blower Shri Navin Prakash Gupta for said exigencies of work   at DRL, Tezpur.

Question No 3 –

The transfer order was as punishment based on allegation & charges and not in any public interest which is quite evident from letter No. DOP/DS/08/01 dated 28th May 2014 issued and signed by Dr. A.K. Singh, DOP.

Therefore, it is requested that please protect whistle blower Shri Navin Prakash Gupta, Scientist ‘C’ from the clutches of corrupt scientists of DRDO and kindly issue orders to Hon’ble Defence Minister to provide immediate protection and relief to whistle blower scientist by cancellation of his transfer order.

The responsibility for execution of Act passed by Parliament after due sanction by Hon’ble President of India is on concerned ministries and ministers. As per this new Act, every ministry should have competent authority to address the matters of victimization of whistle blowers but the requests from whistle blower and his family are being ill-treated by Government officials, ignoring the provisions of whistle blower protection Act 2011.

DRDO is wasting lakhs and lakhs rupees every year in hundreds of court cases running across the country in various courts because of ego satisfaction of top DRDO brass, as well as because of poor HR management victimization of middle class Government servants.

Sir, kindly save this premier organization from the corruption, nepotism and favoritism and give the justice to honest whistle blower scientists and officials of DRDO who are devoted for the Nation.

Regards

PrabhuDandriyal,
21-Sunderwala, Raipur, Dehradun -248008
0135- 2787750, 9411114879,
prabhudoon@gmail.com www.corruptionindrdo.com

Drdo

डी आर डी ओ के अच्छे दिन आने वाले है

1 Comment

परमाणु का प्रकाश आने वाला है – अवि जी जाने वाले है – देसी अम्मा का क्या होगा ?

नयी सुबहः के उज्जवल प्रकाश में डी आर डी ओ नयी इबारत लिखेगी जिसमे  भ्रष्टाचार, भाई भतीजा वाद, चापलूसी, अक्षमता, अवचार, कदाचार, दुर्व्यवहार,अत्याचार,निरकुंशताके लिए कोई जगह नहीं होगी।

आखिरकार मोदी जी ने सुन ली भाई – जय हो !